Printer Friendly

Court rule VA must pay for offshore exposure to Agent Orange.

Vietnam veterans who served in the waters off Vietnam can now claim disability benefits for diseases caused by exposure to Agent Orange, a federal appeals court has ruled. The Aug. 16 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims reversed a VA policy that arbitrarily interpreted "service in the Republic of Vietnam" to mean only service on land areas of Vietnam and not waters offshore within its national boundaries.

The case involved a former U.S. Navy sailor who served on an ammunition ship during the war but never actually set foot on Vietnamese soil. The veteran, Jonathan Haas, blamed his diabetes, nerve damage and loss of eyesight on exposure to clouds of the toxic defoliate, which the United States sprayed on Vietnamese jungles, that drifted out to sea, engulfing his ship and landing on his skin. The VA denied his claim, saying that to qualify for disability benefits, Haas was required to have come ashore in Vietnam, and that decision was later upheld by the Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA).

"A long-standing DAV resolution has sought to extend the presumption of herbicide exposure to include veterans who served in waters offshore of Vietnam," said National Legislative Director Joseph A. Violante. "Veterans who served on vessels in nearby waters had the same risk of exposure to Agent Orange as those who served on adjacent land," he said. "They certainly were at greater risk of exposure than veterans who may have been on land in Vietnam only briefly."

The three-judge panel said VA regulations governing the benefits were unclear. The court said it made no sense for veterans who patrolled Vietnam's inland waterways and those simply passing through the country to receive Agent Orange related benefits while those serving at sea do not.

In issuing its ruling, the court did not actually award a disability to Haas, but sent his case back to the BVA for that determination.

"Veterans who served offshore but did not set foot in Vietnam and who suffer from conditions they believe are caused by exposure to Agent Orange should consider filing a claim for disability. Veterans who have had such claims denied may wish to re-file based on the court's decision. Veterans are encouraged to seek the advice and assistance of a DAV National Service Officer," said National Service Director Randy Reese.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Disabled American Veterans
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Department of Veterans Affairs vs. Jonathan Haas
Publication:DAV Magazine
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2006
Words:389
Previous Article:NSO Abnathey joins Service Headquarters staff.
Next Article:Some disabled retirees to receive back pay.
Topics:


Related Articles
Judicial review bills seek to strengthen veterans' rights. (Legislative Update).
Legislative update.
108th Congress delays key veterans bills.
VA prescription co-pays rise.
Vets shouldn't need to hire lawyers.
VA reaches out to veterans on disability benefits.
Some disabled retirees to receive back pay.
Veterans warned about prescription scam.
In the line of duty.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters