Printer Friendly

Court decision on scoring may spur insurers to reconsider.

A decision by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals finds insurers using credit-based insurance scoring in underwriting must issue adverse action notices to customers much more frequently than they currently do.

Under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, insurance companies must send adverse action notices to consumers whenever insurance premiums or rates are increased based on a credit score. In deciding two similar cases on appeal, the court ruled FCRA requires an adverse action notice be sent whenever a higher rate is charged because of credit information--including when the policy is initially written or when it is renewed.

The court also ruled the adverse action notice is required whenever a consumer would have received a lower insurance rate had his or her credit information been more favorable, regardless of whether the credit rating is above or below average. In addition, the court ruled that charging more for insurance because no or insufficient credit information is available also requires an adverse action notice.

"The Ninth Circuit decision takes the most expansive definition one could possibly imagine of terms such as 'adverse action,'" National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies public policy director Robert Detlefsen said.
COPYRIGHT 2005 A.M. Best Company, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.; Fair Credit Reporting Act; to send adverse action notices to consumers
Author:Cornejo, Rick
Publication:Best's Review
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 1, 2005
Words:195
Previous Article:Toronto crash may cost insurers $200 million.
Next Article:American International Group Inc.
Topics:


Related Articles
Fed law applies to 3-day notice.
More focus on new court term from lawyers, less from media. (News & Trends).
TEXAS CLASS ACTION ON CREDIT-SCORING NOT BARRED BY McCARRAN.
Immigration status is irrelevant to Title VII claim, Ninth Circuit rules.
Just the facts on FACTA: a new law reauthorizing pre-emptions in the Fair Credit Reporting Act makes changes, including some about information...
Splitting with Eleventh Circuit, Seventh Circuit affirms debtors' rights.
Case summaries.
Charlotte Cuno, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., et al., Defendants-Appellees: on appeal from the United States District Court...
'Silent tort reform: federal agencies, not Congress, are capping liability for business.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters