Printer Friendly

Court: Birth control mandate violates religious rights.

JEFFERSON City, Shawwal 18, 1437, Jul 23, 2016, SPA -- A federal judge has ruled in favor of a Missouri lawmaker who cited religious objections while challenging the inclusion of birth control coverage in his government-provided health insurance, according to AP. State Sen. Paul Wieland said Friday that the ruling , while applying only to his family, could serve as a guide for others seeking to challenge the application of a section of President Barack Obama's health care law that requires insurers to include coverage of contraceptives. "I think this sets a precedent, so that if anybody else has religious convictions and they find these drugs offensive ... they can use this as a court case to base their claims on," Wieland said in a phone interview while traveling back from Cleveland, where he was a delegate at the Republican National Convention. The federal attorney who defended the case on behalf of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services referred a reporter to a spokeswoman for the U.S. Justice Department, who did not immediately reply Friday to a question about whether the federal government would appeal. The lawsuit by Wieland and his wife, Teresa, who are Roman Catholics, asserted that it violates their religious beliefs to include contraception coverage in the state health insurance plan that he participates in as a lawmaker. The insurance plan also covers their three daughters. The state of Missouri used to provide employees the option of declining contraceptive coverage. But that changed following a 2013 state court ruling which said the requirements of federal Affordable Care Act superseded a previous state law. In a ruling Thursday siding with the Wielands, U.S. District Judge Jean Hamilton cited the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which says government shall not "substantially burden" a person's exercise of religion unless by the least restrictive means to further a compelling government interest. The judge said the coverage mandate violates that standard, because it didn't offer a less-restrictive alternative such as letting the Wielands opt out of the contraception coverage. -- SPA 02:20 LOCAL TIME 23:20 GMT

All Rights Reversed for Saudi Press Agency Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. ( ).

COPYRIGHT 2016 SyndiGate Media Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Saudi Press Agency (SPA)
Date:Jul 23, 2016
Previous Article:U.S. accuses three more of multimillion-dollar text message scam.
Next Article:Ambassador of Algeria Presents His Credentials as Permanent Representative to OIC.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters