Corneal astigmatism after manual small incision cataract surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 patients (57 male/43 female) with a mean age of 56.8 years (range 51-80 years) were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were patients with age related uncomplicated cataract, keratometric astigmatism of 2.0 D or less, good fixation and cataract upto grade 4 nuclear sclerosis. They were sub divided randomly into two groups of 50 each. Group I received superior incision and Group II received temporal incision. Pre-operatively, a full ophthalmic examination including keratometry and "A" Scan biometry was done by the surgeon. All surgeries were done by one surgeon under peribulbar anaesthesia. The incision architecture was similar in both the groups. A 5.5-6.5 mm scleral frown incision, 1.5-2 mm from the limbus was made with no.15 disposable blade. A funnel shaped sclerocorneal pocket incision was created with a diamond crescent knife. Sideports were made with a diamond knife 15 degree to the right of Scleral funnel. With a diamond keratome, the anterior chamber was entered 1.5 mm into the clear cornea and the internal incision was enlarged sideways to 8 mm. A single piece PMMA IOL of 6 mm optic size and 12.5 mm total size was implanted into the capsular bag. Patients were examined on 1st post-op day and following at 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks for uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, slit lamp examination, fundus examination, keratometry and refraction. Any complication if occurred was recorded.
Preoperative and postoperative (12th weeks) keratometric readings and refraction (12 weeks) were used for analysis. Amplitude of pre-operative astigmatism was calculated from the difference in the keratometric value in the steeper and flatter meridian. Surgically induced astigmatism was calculated by simple subtraction method.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess corneal astigmatism in Manual Incision Cataract Surgery in Superior versus Temporal Incision.
OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS: In Group I, mean age of Patients was 57.44 years (range 51-80 years); 28 patients were male and 22 were female. In Group II, mean age of patients was 56.50 years (range 51-80 years); 29 patients were male and 21 patients were female. Demographics of the patients is given in Table I.
The amplitude of pre-operative astigmatism was similar and it was around 0.68 D in both the groups. The amplitude of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) at the end of 12th week was higher in Group I (1.16 D) than in Group II (0.62 D) as shown in Table II
Distribution of Type of Pre-operative and Post-Operative Corneal astigmatism (CA) shown in Table III
As per pre-operative visual acuity there was no significant difference in the two groups. The difference in uncorrected visual acuity was significant in the two groups at the end of 12th Week as seen from Table IV.
There were few complications like uveitis in 3 patients in Group I and 2 patients in Group II; striae keratitis in 6 and 5 patients in Group I and II respectively.
DISCUSSION: Manual SICS is an alternative for phacoemulsification but the astigmatism is higher due to the larger size of incision. Burgansbey et al (1) have shown an increase in astigmatism with an increase in incision size. In their study, the mean induced astigmatism was 0.6 to 0.3D for 6 mm incision, 0.75 [+ or -] 0.67 D for a 6.5 mm incision and 1.36 [+ or -] 0.77 D for a 7 mm incision.
Roman S et al (2) have shown that surgically induced astigmatism is less (0.53 D) in the temporal incision than in superior incision (0.98D).
Gokhale NS et al (3) have found that the amount of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was lower in the temporal incision group (0.62D) as compared to superior incision group (1.16D).
In our study, we have also found that the amount of SIA was lower in the temporal incision group (0.62) than in superior incision group (1.16D).
Also, the incision at the superior limbus induces a shift towards ATR astigmatism and the incision at the temporal limbus induces a shift towards WTR astigmatism as we found in our study. WTR astigmatism induced by a temporal incision is advantageous as most elderly cataract patients have pre-operative ATR astigamatism.
Madhu M at al (4) reported a higher percentage of eyes in the temporal group group had an uncorrected VA of 20/25 at different points of time.
Mukherji S et al (5) reported that the uncorrected visual outcome was better in the temporal MSICS.
These findings correlate with out study as well.
In conclusion, it may be summarized that MSICS via temporal approach has several advantages over MSICS via superior approach because of following seasons:--
* Working at the temporal periphery, there is no need to turn the eye down, as when working over the brow and therfore the bridle sutures are not required.
* The temporal location allows greater across to the incision that working over the brow.
* At temporal location, the lateral canthal angle is directly beneath the incision. The irrigation fluid drains naturally as when working over the brow.
* The temporal location is farthest from the visual axis and thus the effect of any flattering around the wound is less likely to effect the corneal curvature at the visual axis.
* Incision at temporal location are more stable with respect to ATR shift.
* When the incision is located superiorly, both gravity and eyelid blink tend to scale on the incision. With temporally placed incision these forces are better neutralized because the incision is perpendicular to the vector of forces.
* At temporal location, the astigmatism induced is WTR. This is advantageous to the large majority of cataract patients where post operatives astigmatism is WTR.
(1.) Burgansky Z, Isakov I, Avisemer H, Bastove E. Minimal Astigmatism after sutureless planned extra capsular cataract extraction. Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28: 499-503.
(2.) Roman S, Ullrn M. Astigmatism caused by superior and temporal corneal incisions in cataract surgery. Fr. Ophthalmol 1997; 29(4): 277-83.
(3.) Gokhale NS, Sawhney S. Reduction in astigmatism in MSICS through change of incision site. Ind. J Ophthalmol 2005; 53(3): 201-03.
(4.) Madhu M, Raj UK. A study on post-operative corneal astigmatism in superior and temporal sections of scleral pocket SICS. AIOC 2006 proceedings 328-31.
(5.) Mukharji S, Ramatt PA, Parihar JKS, Bandyopadhyay. Temporal SICS: Practical advantages and great results at low cost--our experience. AIOC 2007 Proceedings:127-30.
(6.) Cheng YC, Wu S. Keratometric astigmatism after cataract surgery using small self-sealing scleral incision. Chang Gung Med J 2001;24(1):19-26.
(7.) Feil SH, Crandall AS, Olson RJ. Astigmatic decay following small incision, self-sealing cataract surgery: one year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995;21:433-36
(8.) Guirao A, Tejedor J, Artal P. Corneal aberrations before and after cataract surgery. Inv. Ophthalmol & Vis Sciences 2004;45(12):4312-19.
(9.) Marek R, Klus A, Pawlik R. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism of temporal versus superior clear corneal incisions. Klin Oczna 2006;108(10-12):392-96
(10.) Merrium J, Zheng H, Urbanowicz J, Zaider M. Change on the horizontal and vertical meridians of the cornea after cataract surgery. Tr Am Ophth Soc 2001;99: 187-97.
(11.) Moon SC, Tarek M, Fine H. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after clear corneal incisions of different sizes. Korean J Ophthalmology. 2007; 21(1):1-5.
(12.) Neilson PJ. Prospective evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism and astigmatic keratotomy effect of various self-sealing small incisions in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surgery 1995; 21(1):43-48.
Rajni Sharma , Mohd. Ayaz Bhat , Pallvi Jamwal , Syed Tariq Qureshi 
[1.] Rajni Sharma
[2.] Mohd. Ayaz Bhat
[3.] Pallvi Jamwal
[4.] Syed Tariq Qureshi
PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:
[1.] Consultant, Department of Ophthalmology, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar.
[2.] Senior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar.
[3.] Senior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar.
[4.] Consultant, Department of Ophthalmology, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar.
NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Mohd. Ayaz Bhat, SKIMS, Medical College, Srinagar, Kashmir. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Date of Submission: 10/03/2014.
Date of Peer Review: 11/03/2014.
Date of Acceptance: 22/03/2014.
Date of Publishing: 05/11/2014.
Table I Group Age-Median Range Male Female Group I 57.44 (51-80 Yrs) 28 22 Group II 56.50 (51-80 Yrs) 29 21 Table II: SIA at the end of 12th Week Astigmatism in diopters Group I Group II 0-1.00 22 46 1.25-2.00 28 4 Mean 1.16 0.62 Table III Group Pre-operative CA Post-Operative CA Nil WTR ATR Nil WTR ATR Group I 0 25 18 2 14 34 Group II 0 21 23 4 35 11 WTR--With the rule ATR--Against the rule Table IV: Post-operative visual acuity at the end of 12th Weeks Uncorrected Visual Group I Group II Acuity (VA) 6/60 or less 0 0 6/36-6/18 12 3 6/12-6/6 38 47 Best corrected 6/60 or less 0 0 6/36-6/18 4 3 6/12-6/6 46 47
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||ORIGINAL ARTICLE|
|Author:||Sharma, Rajni; Bhat, Mohd. Ayaz; Jamwal, Pallvi; Qureshi, Syed Tariq|
|Publication:||Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences|
|Date:||Nov 6, 2014|
|Previous Article:||Surgical challenges in the treatment of hemangioma tongue in a 7 year old child.|
|Next Article:||Evaluation of Congo Red Agar for detection of biofilm production by various clinical Candida isolates.|