# Coping Strategies for Adverse Effects of Antiretroviral Therapy among Adult HIV Patients Attending University of Gondar Referral Hospital, Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

1. Introduction

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Setting. A cross-sectional study design was conducted from February to March 2017 at UoGRH HIV clinic, Northwest Ethiopia. The hospital gives different inpatient and outpatient services for the community (around seven million catchment population). This hospital renders comprehensive HIV related services including voluntary counseling and testing (VCT), provider initiated testing and counseling (PITC), prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT), and ART program. Currently, there are about 5194 HIV patients actively attending ART in the hospital, having the daily patient flow of 150 on average.

2.2. Study Subjects. Adults with age [greater than or equal to] 18 years who were on ART for at least one month and those who came for refill during the period of data collection and who had ART associated adverse effects were included in the study. ART associated adverse effects, which are a harmful or abnormal result caused by administration of medication (ART), were the most common reason for switching or discontinuing therapy and for medication nonadherence.

2.3. Sample Size and Sampling Methods. Sample size was computed by using single population proportion formula as follows:

[mathematical expression not reproducible] (1)

where n is expected sample size for population >10,000; [alpha]/2 is the critical value of a 95% confidence level interval (which corresponds to 1.96); and P means that we use positive prevalence estimated, to maximize sample size. Negative prevalence = 1 - 0.5 = 0.5, d = marginal error (d = 0.05); then the sample size is

n = [1.96.sup.2]0.5(1 - 0.5)/[(0.05).sup.2] = 384.16 =~ 384 (2)

Since the source of population was less than 10,000 (N=5194), reduction formula was employed to compute the final sample size. The corrected sample size, using the following correction formula, was 357.6~358,

Corrected sample size = n x N/n + N (3)

Accordingly, the final sample size with 10% contingency was found to be 394.

A systematic random sampling method was employed to recruit the study participants in each day of the data collection process.

2.4. Data Collection Techniques. Adequate training was given for three pharmacists, who were recruited as data collectors. The training comprised uniform interpretation of the structured questionnaires, strict use of study criterion, explanation of the study objectives, getting oral consents, implementation of sampling technique, and maintaining confidentiality of the collected data. Data were collected by interviewing HIV patients who visited the HIV clinic during the study period using a validated structured questionnaire composed of closed and open ended questions. The structured questionnaire was assessed by an expert in the field of ART for clarity and comprehensiveness of its contents. The questionnaire was first prepared in English and translated to local language (Amharic) for ease of understanding. A pilot study was done with 5% (20) of the study participants and all the necessary modifications were done before implementing in the main study.

2.5. Data Analysis. Data were entered into Epi-Info and analyzed by using SPSS version 20.0 statistical software. Patients' baseline sociodemographic data and the frequency of major adverse effects were summarized using descriptive statistics. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression were conducted to determine the potential predictors of nonadherence coping strategy. Confidence interval (95%) and p value were used or reported in each logistic regression analysis. p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

2.6. Ethical Consideration. Ethical clearance was obtained from Ethical Approval Committee, University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences. Letter of permission was submitted to University of Gondar Referral Hospital medical director office prior to the beginning of the study. Verbal informed consent was obtained from participants before conducting the study. Participants were informed that their participation was voluntary and they can withdraw from the study at any stage if they desire without any penalty. Confidentiality of participants was maintained at all levels of the study and the name and address of the patient were omitted from the questionnaire.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of HIV Patients. Three hundred and ninety-four HIV patients were involved in the study. About two-thirds of study participants were females and majorities (38.1%) of the study participants were within the age group of 35-44 years. Mean age of the study participants was 38.3 (SD = 9.8) years. Being married (51.8%) and orthodox (78.7%) participants accounted for the highest percentage. Being merchant (25.1%) and government employee (22.1%) accounted for the highest percentage of occupation. Education-wise, 25.4% attended primary and higher education (Table 1).

3.2. Clinical Characteristics and Health Conditions. The median CD4 count before ART initiation among the study participants, who faced ART adverse effect, was 153.5 with IQR of 624, while the most recent CD4 count was 384.5 with IQR of 408.8. The majority (43.9%) of the study participants were World Health Organization (WHO) clinical stage III at the time of starting ART, while at the time of data collection majority (95.7%) of study participants were treatment stage 1 (T1). Baseline functional status of the study participants was majorly working (77.9%) while a significant number of patients had ambulatory and bedridden functional status. Nonetheless, the current functional status for almost all (98.7%) of HIV patients was working (Table 2).

3.3. Reasons for Changing ART Regimen. Based on documented reasons from the patient's chart, 118 (29.9%) patients who started ART regimens were changed due to different reasons. Adverse effects (61.9%) were the most common reason for regimen change. Of 118 changed regimens, majority (64, 54.2%) of them were on D4T based ART regimen followed by AZT (34, 28.8%) based regimen and TDF (20, 17%) (Table 3).

3.4. Adverse Effects Experienced by HIV Patients. A total of 880 adverse effects were reported which was on average greater than two adverse effects experienced per patient and the majority of adverse effects were central nervous systems (CNS) and peripheral nervous systems (PNS) (62%), metabolic disorders (16.4%), gastrointestinal (GI) (8.6%), skin (9%), and others (4%). Headache (190, 48.2%), fatigue (71,18%), loss of appetite (69,17.5%), burning sensation (52, 13.2%), back pain (50, 12.7%), and itching (44, 11.2%) were the most noticeable adverse effects experienced by the study participants (Table 4).

Of 394 study participants who had adverse effect, majority (150, 38.1%) were on TDF/3TC/EFV ART regimen followed by AZT/3TC/NVP (124, 31.5%) (Table 5).

3.5. Coping Strategies. The present study showed that positive emotions, social support seeking, taking other medicines to treat ART adverse effect, information seeking, nonadherence, and holy water were used by 91.1%, 76.6%, 76.6%, 48.7%, 35.5%, and 45.9% of study participants, respectively, as coping strategies for adverse effects of ART (Table 6).

3.6. Factors Associated with Coping Strategies Taken by HIV Patients. After controlling different demographic, economical, and other factors through the use of multivariate logistic regression analysis, this study showed that only age, educational status, occupation, and distance were found significantly associated with nonadherence coping strategy for adverse effect of ART (p [less than or equal to] 0.05). HIV patients in the age groups of 18-24 years and 25-34 years were more likely to use nonadherence as coping strategy for adverse effect compared to patients' age above 54 years (AOR = 29.54, 95% CI = 2.49-350.25 and AOR = 3.90, 95% CI = 1.24-12.28), respectively.

HIV patients who could not read and write and who had primary school education were more likely to use nonadherence as coping strategy for adverse effect compared to patients who had higher level of education (AOR = 5.70, 95% CI = 2.16-15.05 and AOR = 2.98, 95% CI = 1.19-7.48), respectively.

Respondents who were merchants, farmers, and daily labors and who had no work used nonadherence more likely compared to those who were government employees (AOR = 10.48, 95% CI = 3.82-28.78; AOR = 21.24, 95% CI = 3.74-78.54; AOR = 10.49, 95% CI = 3.30-33.35; and AOR = 4.88, 95% CI = 1.18-20.19), respectively. Respondents who were living far (>20 km) from the hospital used nonadherence coping strategy more likely compared to those who were nearby ([less than or equal to] 20 km) (AOR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.29-5.57) (Table 7).

4. Discussion

The present study was aimed at assessing the major adverse effects of ART and coping strategies taken by HIV patients for these adverse effects. About 394 HIV patients who had adverse effects were studied for coping strategy(s) of the adverse effect they faced. They used five coping strategies (positive emotion, social support seeking, information seeking, taking other medications, and nonadherence).

This study revealed that adverse effects were the most common reason for ART regimen changes in HIV patients. Nearly one-third of HIV patients ART regimens were changed due to different reasons based on patient's chart review. Out of 118 regimen changes 73 (61.9%) were due to adverse effects followed by unknown reasons (17) (14.4%), due to treatment failure (16) (13.6%), development of tuberculosis (TB) (11) (9.3%), and pregnancy (1) (0.8%). This regimen change due to adverse effect is higher compared to a study carried out in Jimma University Specialized Hospital (30%). Similarly, treatment failure contributed more to ART regimen change in this study than the above study (0.38%). However, tuberculosis drug interactions and pregnancy were lesser reasons for ART regimen change in this study than Jimma study (17.1%, 3.3%), respectively [24]. The probable reason might be due to variations in ART regimens. Regarding the type of ART regimen, about 91.6% of ART regimens were first line, which is less compared to another study in Debre Markos (98%) [25]. The probable reason for this variation might be because patients may get different strength of counseling regarding the importance of medication adherence.

Five main coping strategies for adverse effects of ART were used by HIV patients (positive emotion, social support seeking, nonadherence, information seeking, and taking other medications). The majority (91.1%) of participants in this study used positive emotion coping followed by social support seeking (76.6%), taking other medicines (76.6%), information seeking (48.7%), and nonadherence (35.5%). Contrastingly, a study conducted in San Francisco revealed that nonadherence was the most used coping strategy for adverse effect of ART [7]. The reason for the variations might be due to the current functional status of study participants. In this study, almost all (98.7%) study participants were working and only 1.3% had ambulatory functional status compared to a study in San Francisco, where 71% of study participants were not functionally working.

Although majority (91.1%) of the study participants were using positive emotion, there were also a significant number of patients (35.5%) who used nonadherence as a coping strategy in this study. Similarly, in other studies, 17% (France) [28], 14.4% (Nigeria) [18], and 27% (Uganda) [26] of HIV patients used nonadherence as coping strategy for adverse effect of ART.

In this study information seeking (48.7%) was less likely used by HIV patients compared to Uganda study (91.2%). This variation might be due to educational status variations. In this study (21.3%) HIV patients could not read and write compared to only 4.8% who never had formal education.

In the present study participant's age was significantly associated with nonadherence as a coping strategy. Study participants aged between 18 and 24 years and 25 and 34 years were more likely to use nonadherence as coping strategy for adverse effect than those who were above 54 years which is similar to a study in Nigeria [29]. It is inconsistent with another study finding in Uganda, which reported that nonadherence to ART was not statistically significant with any demographic factors [26]. The probable reasons might be due to the fact that young people did not worry about the consequences of being nonadherent to their ART regimen.

Study participants who were merchants, farmers, and daily laborers and those who had no work used nonadherence as a coping strategy more likely than those who were government employees [29]. This is inconsistent with study in Arsi zone, Oromia, where employment was associated with nonadherence [23]. The possible reasons might be indirectly related to educational status, being busy at work, and being worried about having no work. This finding is also supported by different studies [23,31]. Study participants who could not read and write and who were learning in primary schools were more likely to use nonadherence as coping strategy for adverse effect than those who were above 12th grade. This is in agreement with study in Kenya, which stated that educational status was associated with nonadherence as a coping strategy [31].

Distance from study participant's home to the health institution (UoGRH) was also significantly associated with nonadherence coping strategy. Those who accessed the health institution far away (>20 km) from their home were found to more likely use nonadherence as a coping strategy than those who were nearby (<20 km). This is in line with a study done in Nigeria, which found that those who accessed the health institution far away from their home were found to be nonadherent [32]. This is inconsistent with study done in Arsi zone [23]. These variations might be because distance was categorized as those who were in the town Gondar (20 km) and outside Gondar town (>20 km) transport problem and cost for transport, but in Arsi those in walking (5 km) and beyond 5 km.

4.1. Limitations of the Study. The present study does have some limitations. Due to financial constraints coping strategies were assessed through a self-reporting questionnaire only, which may overestimate the response. The second major limitation of this study is that the respondents consisted only of patients who actually went to ART clinics. We did not interview people who were picking up ART drugs for someone else and this means that we may have missed patients too sick to attend appointments. The final major limitation of this study was the wider confidence interval in the first age category. This resulted from relatively smaller sample size in this age group.

5. Conclusion

The present study revealed that positive emotion coping was the most commonly used strategy. Age, level of education, and distance from health institution were the predictors of nonadherence coping strategy.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
```3TC:     Lamivudine
ABC:     Abacavir
AIDS:    Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
AOR:     Adjusted odds ratios
ART:     Antiretroviral therapy
ATV/r:   Atazanavir/ritonavir
AZT:     Zidovudine
CD4:     Cluster of Differentiation 4
CI:      Confidence interval
EFV:     Efavirenz
HIV:     Human immunodeficiency virus
IQR:     Interquartile range
NVP:     Nevirapine
QoL:     Quality of life
SD:      Standard deviation
SPSS:    Statistical Package for Social Sciences
TDF:     Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
```

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

Approval and permission were sought from Ethical Review Board of College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Authors' Contributions

Yitayih Kefale Gelaw conducted the actual study and the statistical analysis. Yitayih Kefale Gelaw, Boressa Adugna, Adino Tesfahun Tsegaye, Tadesse Melaku, and Belayneh Kefale were involved in developing the idea, designing the study, and writing the manuscript. All authors approved the submitted version of the manuscript.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1879198

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge University of Gondar for financial support towards this project.

References

[1] S. Olsson, "The role of the WHO programme on international drug monitoring in coordinating worldwide drug safety efforts," Drug Safety, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 1998.

[2] K. Khan, A. H. Khan, S. A. Sulaiman, C. Ting Soo, and A. Akhtar, "Adverse drug reactions in HIV/AIDs patients at a tertiary care hospital in Penang, Malaysia," Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 56-59, 2016.

[3] S. P. Wasti, P. Simkhada, J. Randall, J. V. Freeman, E. van Teijlingen, and W. Cameron, "Factors Influencing Adherence to Antiretroviral Treatment in Nepal: A Mixed-Methods Study," PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 5, p. e35547, 2012.

[4] D. Olem, K. M. Sharp, J. M. Taylor, and M. O. Johnson, "Overcoming barriers to HIV treatment adherence: A brief cognitive behavioral intervention for HIV-positive adults on antiretroviral treatment," Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 206-223, 2014.

[5] D. Joseph, Pharmacotherapy: A pathophysiologic approach, McGraw-Hill Medical, 2008.

[6] A. Ermias, G. Gurmesa, M. Mesfin, and A. Mengistu, "Adverse drug reaction monitoring in Ethiopia: Analysis of case reports, 2002-2007," Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 168-173, 2011.

[7] M. O. Johnson and T. B. Neilands, "Coping with HIV treatment side effects: Conceptualization, measurement, and linkages," AIDS and Behavior, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 575-585, 2007.

[8] E. Sabate, Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action, World Health Organization, 2003.

[9] R. Mccraty and D. Tomasino, "Emotional Stress, Positive Emotions, and Psychophysiological Coherence," Stress in Health and Disease, pp. 342-365, 2006.

[10] T. D. Wilson, "Human Information Behavior," Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, vol. 3, pp. 049-056, 2000.

[11] G. Barker, A. Olukoya, and P. Aggleton, "Young people, social support and help-seeking," International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, vol. 17, no. 4, 2005.

[12] A. Parcesepe, O. Tymejczyk, R. Remien et al., "HIV-Related Stigma, Social Support, and Psychological Distress Among Individuals Initiating ART in Ethiopia," AIDS and Behavior, pp. 1-11, 2018.

[13] B. B. Gebrezgabher, Y. Kebede, M. Kindie, D. Tetemke, M. Abay, and Y. A. Gelaw, "Determinants to antiretroviral treatment non-adherence among adult HIV/AIDS patients in northern Ethiopia," AIDS Research and Therapy, vol. 14, no. 1, 2017.

[14] B. Tsega, B. A. Srikanth, and Z. Shewamene, "Determinants of non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy in adult hospitalized patients, Northwest Ethiopia," Patient Preference and Adherence, vol. 9, pp. 373-380, 2015.

[15] M. Vyavaharkar, L. Moneyham, A. Tavakoli et al., "Social support, coping, and medication adherence among HIV-positive women with depression living in rural areas of the southeastern United States," AIDS Patient Care and STDs, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 667-680, 2007.

[16] B. Tessema, F. Biadglegne, A. Mulu, A. Getachew, F. Emmrich, and U. Sack, "Magnitude and determinants of nonadherence and nonreadiness to highly active antiretroviral therapy among people living with HIV/AIDS in Northwest Ethiopia: A cross sectional study," AIDS Research and Therapy, vol. 7, 2010.

[17] N. M. Dube, R. Summers, K.-S. Tint, and G. Mayayise, "A pharmacovigilance study of adults on highly active antiretroviral therapy, South Africa: 2007-2011," Pan African Medical Journal, vol. 11, p. 39, 2012.

[18] K. A. Agu, M. A. Isah, D. Oqua, M. A. Habeeb, P. O. Agada, and S. I. Ohiaeri, "Incidence of adverse drug reactions in Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy: A study of Pharmaceutical Care in HIV Interventions in Nigeria," West African Journal of Pharmacy, vol. 19, no. 24, 2013.

[19] R. Rajesh, S. Vidyasagar, and K. Nandakumar, "Highly active antiretroviral therapy induced adverse drug reactions in Indian human immunodeficiency virus positive patients," Pharmacy Practice, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 48-55, 2011.

[20] R. R. Modayil, A. Harugeri, G. Parthasarathi et al., "Adverse drug reactions to antiretroviral therapy (ART): An experience of spontaneous reporting and intensive monitoring from ART centre in India," Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 247-255, 2010.

[21] F. Weldegebreal, H. Mitiku, and Z. Teklemariam, "Magnitude of adverse drug reaction and associated factors among hiv-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy in hiwot fana specialized university hospital, Eastern Ethiopia," Pan African Medical Journal, vol. 24, article no. 255, 2016.

[22] W. T. Tadesse, A. B. Mekonnen, W. H. Tesfaye, and Y. T. Tadesse, "Self-reported adverse drug reactions and their influence on highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV infected patients: a cross sectional study," BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology, pp. 15-32, 2014.

[23] B. Dibaba and M. Hussein, "Factors Associated with Non Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy among Adults living with HIV/AIDS in Arsi Zone, Oromia," Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research, vol. 08, no. 01, 2017.

[24] G. Teklay, B. Legesse, and M. Legesse, "Adverse Effects and Regimen Switch among Patients on Antiretroviral Treatment in a Resource Limited Setting in Ethiopia," Journal of Pharmacovigilance, vol. 01, no. 04, p. 115, 2013.

[25] M. Asrat et al., "Prevalence and Associated Factors of Art Adverse Effect among PLWH on Art in Debre Markose Referal Hospital, North East Ethiopia, 2013," Family Medicine & Medical Science Research, vol. 03, no. 03, 2014.

[26] R. Kyajja, J. K. Muliira, and E. Ayebare, "Personal coping strategies for managing the side effects of antiretroviral therapy among patients at an HIV/AIDS clinic in Uganda," African Journal of AIDS Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 205-211, 2011.

[27] M. Lorio, J. Colasanti, S. Moreira, G. Gutierrez, and C. Quant, "Adverse drug reactions to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients at the largest public hospital in Nicaragua," Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 466-470, 2014.

[28] G. Quatremere, M. Guiguet, P. Girardi et al., "How are women living with HIV in France coping with their perceived side effects of antiretroviral therapy? Results from the EVE study," PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 3, p. e0173338,2017.

[29] K. A. Agu, A. C. Oparah, and U. M. Ochei, "Assessment of side effects coping practices of HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy," Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1302-1310, 2012.

[30] A. Jain, R. J. Lihite, M. Lahkar, and S. K. Baruah, "A study on adverse drug reactions to first-line antiretroviral therapy in HIV infected patients at a tertiary care hospital in Northeast India," HIV & AIDS Review, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 131-135, 2016.

[31] E. Munene and B. Ekman, "Association between patient engagement in HIV care and antiretroviral therapy medication adherence: Cross-sectional evidence from a regional HIV care center in Kenya," AIDS Care Psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 378-386, 2015.

[32] G. R. Pennap, U. Abdullahi, and I. A. Bako, "Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy and its challenges in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in Keffi," Nigeria. Journal of AIDS and HIV Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 52-28, 2013.

Yitayih Kefale Gelaw, (1) Boressa Adugna, (2) Adino Tesfahun Tsegaye, (3) Tadesse Melaku, (2) and Belayneh Kefale (4)

(1) Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Enat Hospital, Amhara Region, North Shewa, Alem Ketema, Ethiopia

(2) Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

(3) Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

(4) Department of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Science, Ambo University, P.O. Box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia

Correspondence should be addressed to Yitayih Kefale Gelaw; yitayihkefale@yahoo.com

Received 8 February 2018; Revised 30 September 2018; Accepted 19 November 2018; Published 2 December 2018

Academic Editor: Brian W. Pence
```Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of the study
participants.

Characteristics           Category         Frequency (%)

Age                      18-24 years         11 (2.8)
25-34 years         130 (33)
35-44 years        150 (38.1)
45- 54 years         78 (19.8)
>54 years          25 (6.3)
Educational status   Can't read & write      84 (21.3)
Can read & write       53 (13.4)
Grade 1-8th        100 (25.4)
Grade 9-12th         81 (20.6)
College/university      76 (19.3)
Occupation           Government employee     87 (22.1)
Merchant          99 (25.1))
Farmer            30 (7.6)
Student            7 (1.8)
Daily laborer        65 (16.5)
Housewife          84 (21.3)
Others'           22 (5.6)
Marital status             Single            66 (16.8)
Married          204 (51.8)
Divorced           65 (16.5)
Widowed            59 (15)
Ethnicity                  Amhara           309 (78.4)
Kimant            58 (14.7)
Tigrie            24 (6.1)
Awi              3 (0.8)

* Retired and those who had no work.

Table 2: Clinical characteristics and health conditions among
patients with HIV/AIDS.

Characteristics               Category    Frequency (%)

WHO clinical stage            Stage I       93 (23.6)
Stage II       75 (19)
Stage III     173 (43.9)
Stage IV      53 (13.5)
Treatment (T) stage              T1        377 (95.7)
T2          12 (3)
T3          5 (1.3)
Baseline functional status    Working      307 (77.9)
Ambulatory     61 (15.5)
Bedridden       26(6.6)
Current functional status     Working      389 (98.7)
Ambulatory      5 (1.3)
Bedridden        0(0)

Table 3: Documented reasons for changing ART regimens at University
of Gondar.

Reasons of ART changes   1st change (%)   2nd change (%)

(1) Adverse effect         73 (61.9)        10 (45.5)
(2) TB                      11 (9.3)           0(0)
(3) Pregnancy               1 (0.8)          1 (4.5)
(4) Rx. failure            16 (13.6)         5 (22.7)
(5) Unknown                17 (14.4)         1 (4.5)
(6) Unavailability            0(0)           5 (22.7)
N                             118               22

Reasons of ART changes   3rd change (%)

(1) Adverse effect           3(30)
(2) TB                        0(0)
(3) Pregnancy                 0(0)
(4) Rx. failure              0 (0)
(5) Unknown                  1(10)
(6) Unavailability           6(60)
N                              10

Table 4: Frequency distribution of adverse effects experienced by
HIV patients who were attending HIV clinic at UoGRH.

Number of HIV
Type of Adverse effects   patients N (%)

Central Nervous               Headache             190 (48.2)
System (CNS) &                Sedation               12 (3)
Peripheral nervous          Hallucination           25 (6.3)
system (PNS)                   Anxiety             42 (10.7)
Nervousness            26 (6.6)
Insomnia             42 (10.7)
Forgetfulness           26 (6.6)
Vertigo              36 (9.1)
Tinnitus              14 (3.6)
Back pain            50 (12.7)
Peripheral numbness        30 (7.6)
Burning sensation        52 (13.2)

Total CNS & peripheral adverse effects
Gastrointestinal (GI)         Gastritis             38 (9.6)
Vomiting               12 (3)
Diarrhea              10 (2.5)
Nausea               16 (4.1)
Total GI adverse effects
Skin                          Skin rash             21 (5.3)
Itching             44 (11.2)
Sweating              14 (3.6)
Total skin adverse effects
Metabolic                 Loss of appetite         69 (17.5)
Fatigue              71 (18)
Lipodystrophy           3 (0.8)
Hyperglycemia           2 (0.5)
Total Metabolic adverse effects
Others                         Anemia                8 (2)
Vision problem           13(3.3)
Loss of sexual desire       3 (0.8)
Bloating              5 (1.3)
Crampy abdominal pain       6 (1.5)
effects

Type of Adverse effects     effects N (%)

Central Nervous               Headache              190 (21.6)
System (CNS) &                Sedation               12 (1.4)
Peripheral nervous          Hallucination            25 (2.8)
system (PNS)                   Anxiety               42 (4.8)
Nervousness              26 (3)
Insomnia               42 (4.8)
Forgetfulness             26 (3)
Vertigo               36 (4.1)
Tinnitus               14 (1.6)
Back pain              50 (5.7)
Peripheral numbness         30 (3.4)
Burning sensation          52 (5.9)

Total CNS & peripheral adverse effects               545 (62)
Gastrointestinal (GI)         Gastritis              38 (4.3)
Vomiting               12 (1.4)
Diarrhea               10 (1.1)
Nausea                16 (1.8)
Total GI adverse effects                             76 (8.6)
Skin                          Skin rash              21 (2.4)
Itching                44 (5)
Sweating               14 (1.6)
Total skin adverse effects                            79 (9)
Metabolic                 Loss of appetite           69 (7.8)
Fatigue               71 (8.1)
Lipodystrophy             3 (0.3)
Hyperglycemia             2 (0.2)
Total Metabolic adverse effects                     145 (16.4)
Others                         Anemia                 8(0.9)
Vision problem             13(1.5)
Loss of sexual desire         3 (0.3)
Bloating                5 (0.6)
Crampy abdominal pain         6 (0.7)
Total other adverse                                   35 (4)
effects
Grand total adverse                                  880 (100)
effects

Table 5: Cross-tabulation between current ART regimens and adverse
effects reported byHIV patients who were attending UoGRH.

Current ART Regimens

Adverse effects       N (%)      AZT/3TC/EFV   AZT/3TC/NVP

Total pts.          394 (100)     43 (10.8)    124 (31.5)

Yes               190 (48.2)    30 (69.8)     51 (41.1)
No                204 (51.8)    13 (30.2)     73 (58.9)
Loss of appetite
Yes               69 (17.5)     8 (18.6)      18 (14.5)
No                325 (82.5)    35 (81.4)    106 (85.5)
Fatigability
Yes                71 (18)       6 (14)       25 (20.2)
No                 323 (82)      37 (86)      99 (79.8)
Burning sensation
Yes               52 (13.2)     8 (18.6)      19 (15.3)
No                342 (86.8)    35 (81.4)    105 (84.7)
Back pain
Yes               50 (12.7)     8 (18.6)      14 (11.3)
No                344 (87.3)    35 (81.4)    110 (88.7)
Insomnia
Yes               42 (10.7)     5 (11.6)      10 (8.1)
No                352 (89.3)    38 (88.4)    114 (91.9)
Anxiety
Yes               42 (10.7)      4 (9.3)       6 (4.8)
No                352 (89.3)    39 (90.7)    118 (95.2)
Itching
Yes               44 (11.2)      2 (4.7)      17 (13.7)
No                350 (88.8)    41 (95.3)    107 (86.3)

Current ART Regimens

Adverse effects     TDF/3TC/EFV   TDF/3TC/NVE   ABC/3TC/EFV

Total pts.          150 (38.1)     41 (10.4)      1 (0.3)

Yes                73 (48.7)     20 (48.8)      1 (100)
No                 77 (51.3)     21 (51.2)       0 (0)
Loss of appetite
Yes                 24 (16)      7 (17.1)        0 (0)
No                 126 (84)      34 (82.9)      1 (100)
Fatigability
Yes                 27 (18)      5 (12.2)        0 (0)
No                 123 (82)      36 (87.8)      1 (100)
Burning sensation
Yes                 15 (10)       4 (9.8)        0 (0)
No                 135 (90)      37 (90.8)      1 (100)
Back pain
Yes                16 (10.7)     6 (14.6)        0 (0)
No                134 (89.3)     35 (85.4)      1 (100)
Insomnia
Yes                22 (14.7)      3 (7.3)        0 (0)
No                128 (85.3)     38 (92.7)      1 (100)
Anxiety
Yes                26 (17.3)     5 (12.2)        0 (0)
No                124 (82.7)     36 (87.8)      1 (100)
Itching
Yes                 12 (8)        9 (22)         0 (0)
No                 138 (92)       32 (78)       1 (100)

Current ART Regimens

Adverse effects     TDF/3TC/ATV/r   ABC/3TC/ATV/r   AZT/3TC/ATV/r

Total pts.            10 (2.5)        14 (3.6)         9 (2.3)

Yes                  4 (40)         6 (42.9)        4 (44.4)
No                   6 (60)         8 (57.1)        5 (55.6)
Loss of appetite
Yes                  3 (30)         6 (42.9)        2 (22.2)
No                   7 (70)         8 (57.1)        7 (77.8)
Fatigability
Yes                  3 (30)         4 (28.6)        1 (11.1)
No                   7 (70)         10 (71.7)       8 (88.9)
Burning sensation
Yes                   0 (0)         3 (21.4)        2 (22.2)
No                  10 (100)        11 (78.6)       7 (77.8)
Back pain
Yes                  3 (30)          1 (7.1)        2 (22.2)
No                   7 (70)         13 (92.9)       7 (77.8)
Insomnia
Yes                  2 (20)           0 (0)           0 (0)
No                   8 (80)         14 (100)         9 (100)
Anxiety
Yes                  1 (10)           0 (0)           0 (0)
No                   9 (90)         14 (100)         9 (100)
Itching
Yes                   0 (0)         2 (14.3)        2 (22.2)
No                  10 (100)        12 (85.7)       7 (77.8)

Current ART Regimens

Total pts.                2 (0.5)

Yes                      1 (50)
No                       1 (50)
Loss of appetite
Yes                      1 (50)
No                       1 (50)
Fatigability
Yes                      0 (0)
No                      2 (100)
Burning sensation
Yes                      1 (50)
No                       1 (50)
Back pain
Yes                      0 (0)
No                      2 (100)
Insomnia
Yes                      0 (0)
No                      2 (100)
Anxiety
Yes                      0 (0)
No                      2 (100)
Itching
Yes                      0 (0)
No                      2 (100)

Table 6: Responses for each coping strategy for adverse effects of
ART by HIV patientswho were attending HIV clinic at UoGRH.

Coping strategy          Responses

Yes (%)       No (%)

Positive emotion         359 (91.1)    35 (8.9)
Seeking social support   302 (76.6)   92 (23.4)
Non-adherence            140 (35.5)   254 (64.5)
Information seeking      192 (48.7)   202 (51.3)
Take other medicines     302 (76.6)   92 (23.4)
Holy water **            181 (45.9)   213 (54.1)

** Used with the five main coping strategies.

Table 7: Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated
with nonadherence coping strategy at UoGRH.

Variables                Yes (%)       No (%)     Total (n)
Age (years)
18-24                   10 (90.9)     1 (9.1)        11
25-34                   71 (54.6)    59 (45.4)       130
35-44                    42 (28)      108 (72)       150
45-54                   11 (14.1)    67 (85.9)       78
>54                       6(24)       19 (76)        25
Occupation
Government employee      8 (9.2)     79 (90.8)       87
Merchant                56 (56.6)    43 (43.4)       99
Farmer                   18 (60)      12 (40)        30
Student                  2 (28.6)     5 (71.4)        7
Daily labourer          32 (49.2)    33 (50.8)       65
Housewife               17 (20.2)    67 (79.8)       84
Retired & had no work    7 (31.8)    15 (68.2)       22
Educational status
Can't read & write      45 (53.6)    39 (46.4)       84
Can read & write        26 (49.1)    27 (50.9)       53
Primary (1-8th)          46 (46)      54 (54)        100
Secondary (9-12th)       9 (11.1)    72 (88.9)       81
Above 12th              14 (18.4)     62(81.6)       76
Distance (km)
1-20                    108 (33.2)   217 (66.8)      325
>20                     32 (46.4)    37 (53.6)       69

Variables                  COR (95% CI)          AOR (95%% CI)
Age (years)
18-24                   31.66 (3.33-300.81)   29.54 (2.49-350.25)
25-34                    3.81 (1.43-10.16)     3.90 (1.24-12.28)
35-44                    1.23 (0.46-3.30)      1.51 (0.48-4.79)
45-54                    0.52 (0.17-1.59)      0.44 (0.12-1.62)
>54                              1                     1
Occupation
Government employee              1                     1
Merchant                12.86 (5.61-29.45)    10.48 (3.82-28.78)
Farmer                  14.81 (5.28-41.52)    21.24 (5.74-78.54)
Student                  3.95 (0.65-23.75)     7.18 (0.93-55.65)
Daily labourer           9.57 (3.99-22.96)    10.49 (3.30-33.35)
Housewife                2.51 (1.02-6.17)      2.69 (0.89-8.10)
Retired & had no work    4.61 (1.45-14.63)     4.88 (1.18-20.19)
Educational status
Can't read & write       5.11 (2.48-10.51)     5.70 (2.16-15.05)
Can read & write         4.26 (1.93-9.41)      2.02 (0.73-5.59)
Primary (1-8th)          3.77 (1.87-7.60)      2.98 (1.19-7.48)
Secondary (9-12th)       0.55 (0.22-1.37)      0.38 (0.13-1.13)
Above 12th                       1                     1
Distance (km)
1-20                             1                     1
>20                      1.74 (1.03-2.94)      2.68 (1.29-5.57)

Variables               P--value
Age (years)
18-24                   0.007 *
25-34                   0.020 *
35-44                    0.485
45-54                    0.219
>54
Occupation
Government employee
Merchant                0.001 *
Farmer                  0.001 *
Student                  0.059
Daily labourer          0.001 *
Housewife                0.079
Retired & had no work   0.029 *
Educational status
Can't read & write      0.001 *
Can read & write         0.175
Primary (1-8th)         0.020 *
Secondary (9-12th)       0.083
Above 12th
Distance (km)
1-20
>20                     0.008 *

COR = crude odds ratio, AOR = adjusted odds ratio, and CI = confidence
interval.
```
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.