Printer Friendly

Controlling cast iron gas defects.

Charge materials chemistry, melting practices and molten metal handling procedures are root causes, but defects can be avoided.

Cast iron gas defects generally result from faulty charge materials or careless melting and handling practices. Evident as pinholes, blowholes or fissures, they are generated, alone or in combination with other gases, by the excessive formation of hydrogen ([H.sub.2]), nitrogen ([N.sub.2]), carbon monoxide (CO) and possibly ow gen ([O.sub.2]) gases.

Pinholes account for a significant portion of the scrap losses by commercial foundries. Castings lost to scrap due to pinholes are approximately 50% greater in ductile iron than gray iron. Caused mainly by hydrogen or nitrogen induced during the melting process, they can be prevented by the magnesium (Mg) treatment process. They also may result from mold atmosphere pickup.

Hydrogen pinholes are round or egg-shaped. Usually occurring just below the casting surface, they are associated with wet sand and have a smooth interior with a crystalline graphite coating. The microstructure in the area of an [H.sub.2] pinhole often consists of a ferrite ring containing vermicular or flake graphite. Nitrogen pinholes in ductile iron can be spherical with visually dull interior linings. Discriminating between the two is difficult.

Blowholes are entrapped or retained gas bubbles formed as solidification begins and contain a gas whose pressure is greater than that of the surrounding metal. Blowholes are also caused by CO developed in a slag reaction with precipitated graphite.

Fissures are irregular openings in the metal. Single fissures, rather than several small interconnected ones, are associated with melt chemistry or melting practices. Fissures can be caused by either [H.sub.2] or [N.sub.2].

There is a great deal unknown about the origination of gases and their interaction with molten iron, but research and experience have provided an understanding of and many solutions to gas defects.

Hydrogen Defects

Hydrogen gas defects in cast iron appear most commonly as pinholes, blowholes and fissures, but it is possible for iron to contain an appreciable amount of [H.sub.2] and have no defects.

Pinholes occur just below the surface of the casting and often are visible only after removing a casting's surface. They are spherical or flat-shaped gas bubbles 1/32-1/8 in. in diameter with shiny, graphite-coated cavities surrounded by graphite-free iron. Occasionally, the pinhole cavity will contain a shot of exuded metal but never any nonmetallic inclusion.

Pinholes can also be formed by [N.sub.2], CO and sometimes, indirectly, by dross. Thus, it is necessary to classify pinholes by cause. There is no good correlation between hydrogen pickup or the hydrogen content of an iron and pinhole formation. There does, however, appear to be enough evidence to say that hydrogen content is a factor. Evidence shows that hydrogen pickup from damp ladles and launders can intensify the pinhole defect.

Pinholes, too, can be related to a metal/ mold reaction. The increased gas content in a base iron, then, would be expected to lower the threshold facilitating the formation of [H.sub.2] or [N.sub.2] pinholes.

The presence of aluminum (Al) in iron will promote [H.sub.2] pinholes. It is suggested that moisture from the green sand mold reacts with the Al in the iron to form aluminum oxide ([Al.sub.2] [O.sub.3]) and [H.sub.2]. When an Al-bearing iron solidifies in air, it does not tend to produce pinholes. If the same iron were to solidify in contact with a green sand mold, surface pinholes would probably result. Hydrogen pinholes are also the result of interactions in the mold between organic materials and hot metal.

There is some inconsistency among metallurgists as to the level of Al that will cause pinholes. It seems that below a certain level (possibly 0.01% Al), pinhole formation is not a problem. When this Al threshold is crossed, the incidence and severity of the pinholes increase. At an even higher Al threshold content (possibly 0.20% Al and above), [H.sub.2] pinholes cease to be a problem. Other studies have held that Al content in the 0.005-0.02% range is harmful.

Aluminum in an iron melt comes from man sources such as Al attachments to ferrous charge materials like engine blocks and pistons. Significant Al is usually present in inoculating ferrosilicon (0.7-4.0% Al) and in magnesium ferrosilicon (0.6-1.2% Al) treatment alloys.

Ferrosilicon used in the charge makeup can also contribute to a higher Al residual (0.05-1.5% Al in Fesi is typical), although low Al grades are available. It is difficult to produce ductile iron and stay below the suggested 0.01% Al level, though pinholes are not always produced due to Al presence. Other interactions may determine defect formation.

A metal treatment can lower the Al in an iron. Aluminum content and pinhole severity may be reduced by the use of an oxygen lance or by plunging iron ore pellets into the melt, but, in practice, this latter technique is seldom used.

Magnesium levels and treatment conditions have an influence on the hydrogen level and the resulting pinhole severity. For Mg levels up to 0.1% (high for ductile iron), hydrogen content increases with no pinhole increase. With Mg levels over 0.1%, [H.sub.2] will increase and pinhole formation will decrease. Utilizing an NiMg alloy reduces pinholing compared to an MgFeSi alloy due to the lower Al input. Studies show that superheated iron treated with an Mg alloy at a lower temperature will produce more pinholes than when treated at the higher temperature.

Cast iron alloying elements, often in minute quantities, can affect pinhole formation. High C content, up to the eutectic composition, favors pinhole formation in ductile iron. Above the eutectic composition, pinholing subsides.

Studies have shown that late additions of tellurium (Te) in the range of 0.002-0.003% and bismuth (Bi) at 0.004-0.10% help decrease pinholes in gray iron. It also is known that pinholes occur in gray iron with over 0.01% Te, 0.084% titanium (Ti) and 0.15% S. However, some of these elements can induce other defects.

As noted, pinholes are formed by the interaction of hot metal and the mold, but can be reduced by lowering the amount of water in the green molding sand. Seacoal, pitch and/or other volatile carbonaceous mold additives also will reduce [H.sub.2] pinholes. "Mold barriers" formed with sodium silicate washes and additives, such as iron oxide ([Fe.sub.2] [O.sub.3]), are reported to be successful in reducing pinholes.

Blowholes are iron casting defects attributed to [H.sub.2], although other gases are usually involved. Blowholes are bubbles of entrapped or retained gas formed during solidification. These cavities, or blowholes, contain a gas whose pressure is greater than that exerted by the atmosphere and the surrounding metal.

Inconclusive studies have not proved that specific amounts of gases in the metal result in a corresponding severity of blowholes. It is unlikely that a dangerous gas level can predict defect severity. Gas content depends on the alloy as well as foundry practices and the relative levels of all gases.

A gas defect study conducted with pure iron resulted in only a few blowholes. However, when a foreign particle or substance was added to a molten iron specimen, many bubbles formed.

Fissure-type defects can be caused by [H.sub.2]o r [N.sub.2]. If this defect is present in iron melted in a cupola from a high steel scrap charge, it is probably due to [N.sub.2]. Iron or steel scrap contains about 70-100 ppm of [N.sub.2,] but the opportunity for [N.sub.2] absorption during subsequent remelting is potentially greater in a low-carbon ferrous melt. The presence of a confinuous graphite film indicates that the defect is caused by [H.sub.2], but it is difficult to distinguish between fissures caused by either gas.

If [H.sub.2] is believed to be the cause of the defect, the Al content should be measured and reduced if too high because Al promotes [H.sub.2] pickup in iron. Sources of water vapor, such as furnace and ladle refractory linings, should be eliminated.

Nitrogen

The solubility of nitrogen in cast iron depends on furnace temperature and Si and C contents. Unlike other solidification systems, N is temporarily more soluble in austenite than the liquid iron. Nitrogen contents are less likely to exceed the solubility limits at high carbon equivalent values. The shift in [N.sub.2] levels due to a change in solubility conditions generally occurs slowly are shown in Fig. 1 and 2.

Farquhar's Table 1 illustrates typical N levels observed in commercially produced irons.
Table 1. Typical Nitrogen Levels Observed in Commercially
Produced Irons.

 Malleable Iron 0.005-0.0140%
 Gray Iron 0.004-0.007%
 Untreated Ductible Iron 0.004-0.012%
 Treated Ductile Iron 0.003-0.008%


The nitrogen content of an iron is usually expressed as the total N content, meaning uncombined N dissolved in the iron as well as various particles of N compounds suspended in the iron. Allowing the iron to sit would provide time for these "nitride particles" to float out of the melt, although they are small and their flotation is slow.

The solubility of (uncombined) [N.sub.2] (at l atmos. pressure) in pure iron is approximately 400 ppm. The addition of C and Si lowers this solubility; Mg, Cr, and Va raise the solubility and Ni has very little effect (Fig. 3). Higher temperatures raise gas solubility in molten iron.

Various carbon-raising additives can significantly increase [N.sub.2] in the melt. Listed in Table 2 are the various properties for some common C additives.
Table 2. Properties for Carbon Additives
 Carbon Additive %S %N %Volatiles
 Artificial Graphite 0.04-0.09 0.1 0.35
 Mexican Graphite 0.08-1.0 0.1 8-9.0
 Calcined Petroleum Coke 0.42 0.5-1.0 0.35
 1.50 2.4 Max 1.5
 Green Petroleum Coke 1.5-3.0 1.0 6.0
 Metallurgical Coke 2.0 0.7-1.5 1.2
 0.7 0.2-0.5
 Anthracite Coal 0.7-2.0 1.0 8.1


Pig iron, foundry returns and scrap steel are significant sources of N. Foundry returns, and particularly pig iron, usually will not be high in N due to their already high C and Si contents. Steel scrap, with N at 30-150 ppm, can contain higher levels of N than iron and can accommodate more N during melting due to lower C content.

Table 3 illustrates the N content of a melt compared to the percent of steel scrap in a charge for cupola-melted iron. The higher N level may be due more to the higher melting temperature of a steel charge and higher N and C raisers when steel is substituted for iron in the charge.
Table 3. Nitrogen Content to Steel Scrap in Cupola-Melted
Iron

 Percentage Steel Scrap Nitrogen Content
 In Charges Of melt(%)

 25 0.011
 80 0.015
 100 0.017


Alloy additions from ferroalloys normally are not an [N.sub.2] source, but alloy data sheets should be checked because some ferroalloys intentionally contain appreciable levels of N.

Melting methods will have an effect upon the N level in the melt (as shown in Table 4) for malleable iron production.
Table 4. Effects of Melting on Nitrogen Levels

 Melting Process Primary Melter Pouring Ladle

 Arc Melter 130-190 ppm 100-130 ppm
 Cupola 110-145 100-130
 Coreless Induction 80-130 80-120
 Channel Induction 75-110 100-120


The cupola would be expected to produce a high N iron. The high temperature inside the cupola shaft, high steel scrap charge, exposure to coke and a high air volume (wind) would serve to raise the N content.

Arc melting conditions illustrate this high N content. Arc furnace charges normally are composed of high steel scrap and carbon raiser materials with the potential for carrying a high [N.sub.2] content to the melt. The electric arc has a high ionizing potential and extremely high, localized metal temperatures. The solubility of N in iron increases as the temperature rises and acid slag conditions in the furnace retard the N metal content; higher N levels result in a basic slag practice. High S and carbon boil during melting inhibit [N.sub.2] absorption.

Induction furnaces produce the lowest N-level irons and, though they receive high steel scrap charges, liquid bath holding time is long and the stirring action vigorous. These circumstances allow the N to reach an equilibrium level.

In a cupola charge, Ti is useful in neutralizing the N effect by adding Ti-bearing pig iron or ferrotitanium, titanium-containing inoculants or Ilmenite (FeTi[O.sub.3]) or Rutile (Ti[O.sub.2]) minerals. Treating iron with Mg to produce ductile iron reduces [N.sub.2] levels because the vigorous gas evolution of the Mg treatment will carry N from the melt and make [N.sub.2] levels in treated ductile iron less than in its base iron.

Oxygen

It is difficult to omit [O.sub.2] even though it is not believed to be the gas that actually forms a defect. Oxygen is chemically reactive and oxidation/reduction reactions are believed to contribute to the creation of gas defects.

Certain melting conditions can be associated with increasing the [O.sub.2] content in iron, such as over-blowing a cupola or rusty charge materials.

The addition of deoxidizing or reactive elements (Al, Ti, Si, C, Mg, etc.) will reduce the soluble [O.sub.2] content in iron.

The total [O.sub.2] content of cast iron is reported to be between 5 - 250 ppm and the soluble [O.sub. 2] content up to 15 ppm. Treating ductile base iron with an Mg and Si inoculation can lower the soluble [O.sub.2] Three factor - Si, C and temperature - influence the amount of dissolved [O.sub.2] in cast iron. At temperatures below the inversion temperature (about 2372F), [O.sub.2] levels are controlled more by Si than C. The major process variable, however, seems to be temperature as evidenced by the small changes in C or Si in cast iron production.

Dissolved gases in cast iron and the defects they cause are complex. Measurement is difficult. [H.sub.2] is particularly difficult to sample because of the rapid diffusion of the gas from the sample and the need to send the sample to a remote laboratory.

In summation, one AFS Cast Iron Division member cautioned that "the role of gases as the cause of casting defects should be studied for relationships to the chemical and physical reactions in progress rather than for relationships to some specific percentages (of a gas) present at any given moment of sampling."

Bibliography

The Ductile iron Process, Compendium Vil, Miller and Co., Chicago (1985). Masahiro, Takehito, Satora, "Effect of Hydrogen on Blowhole Formation in Pure Iron during Solidification," Tetsu-To-Hagane (1976). J. Greenhill, "Diagnosis of Causes of Defects in Gray Iron Castings." Foundry Trade Journal (Oct. 29, 1970). "Pinholes Formed by Hydrogen Gas During Solidification," BCIRA Broadsheet, No. 7. M. Svilar, J. Wallace, "Removal of Alumina from Gray Cast Iron to Reduce Pinholes," AFS Transactions, vol 86, pp 421-430 (1978). R. Naik, J. Wallace, "Surface Tension - Nucleation Relations in Cast Iron Pinhole Formation," AFS Transactions, pp 367-388, vol 85 (1980). E. Haack, "What Causes Pinhole Porosity in Gray Iron," Foundry, pp 80-83 (June 1961). J. Farquhar, "Nitrogen in Ductile Iron - A Literature Review," AFS Transactions, Paper 79-92, pp 433-348 (1979). R. Pehlke, G. Strong, H. Wada, "Nitrogen in Malleable Iron Production," AFS Transactions, vol 86, p 125 (1978). S. Katz, C. Laudefield, "Foundry Processes: Their Chemistry and Physics," Plenum Press, NY (1988). R. Heine, "Gases in Ferrous Metals," University of Wisconsin-Madison.
COPYRIGHT 1993 American Foundry Society, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:part 3
Author:Kern, Ronald
Publication:Modern Casting
Date:Sep 1, 1993
Words:2626
Previous Article:Acrylic-epoxy binders for coldbox core and moldmaking.
Next Article:ISO 9002 at Atlas Foundry is only part of the commitment.
Topics:


Related Articles
Austempered ductile iron: fact and fiction.
A new look at pig iron.
Reducing slag-related defects in cast iron.
The key to EPC's future: refining technology.
Sulfur control at the mold metal interface of cast ductile iron.
Understanding metal penetration in green sand: cast iron.
Developments in continuous casting of gray and ductile iron.
Explaining the peculiar: cast iron anomalies and their causes.
Advancing ductile iron production.
Simulation Case Histories: Solving Problems while Optimizing Processes.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters