Consolidation decision deferred to enable fine-tuning.
CIMA's president, Roland Kaye, explained that further discussions were required to ensure that the institute's identity was preserved. "A huge amount of effort has gone into defining the shape of the new institute," he told Financial Management. "Each organisation has distinct strengths and defined interests, so it's important to get the proposals absolutely right. Our council concluded that the current proposals did not yet recognise the distinctiveness of CIMA."
Kaye's opposite numbers at the ICAEW and CIPFA, Paul Druckman and Mike Barnes, said that the proposals needed to be defined rigorously to ensure that they were attractive to the members of all three institutes. "These are complex discussions and we are conscious of the past history," Druckman said. "We are continuing to work together to identify the best possible proposition for members."
A more detailed plan will be considered by all three councils shortly. If the decision is made to take the consolidation plan further, members will be asked to vote some time this summer.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||First In ...|
|Publication:||Financial Management (UK)|
|Article Type:||Brief Article|
|Date:||Feb 1, 2005|
|Previous Article:||CIMA responds to tsunami disaster.|
|Next Article:||Postal voting puts underfunded UK electoral system at risk of collapse.|