Printer Friendly

Competence of American robins as reservoir hosts for Lyme disease spirochetes.

To explore the competence of American robins as a reservoir for Lyme disease spirochetes, we determined the susceptibility of these birds to tickborne spirochetes and their subsequent infectivity for larval vector ticks. Robins acquired infection and became infectious to almost all xenodiagnostic ticks soon after exposure to infected nymphal ticks. Although infectivity waned after 2 months, the robins remained susceptible to reinfection, became infectious again, and permitted repeated feeding by vector ticks. In addition, spirochetes passaged through birds retained infectivity for mammalian hosts. American robins become as infectious for vector ticks as do reservoir mice, but infectivity in robins wanes more rapidly.

Lyme disease spirochetes (Borrelia burgdorferi s.l.) perpetuate in cycles involving rodent reservoir hosts, such as white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in eastern North America (1) and Apodemus spp. mice in Eurasia (2). Such hosts readily become infectious to vector ticks and appear to remain so lifelong. They serve as natural reservoirs of infection because numerous subadult vector ticks parasitize them, they are abundant, and they remain in constant residence in tick-infested sites. Rats (Rattus norvegicus and R. rattus) (3,4) and European dormice (Glis glis and Eliomys quercinus) (5,6) are similarly competent and locally important hosts to these pathogens. Although hares (Lepidus timidus) support infection with Lyme disease spirochetes in Europe (7), the competence of rabbits for these spirochetes has not been proven. A related spirochete, B. andersonii, appears to be specific to American rabbits (8,9). Ungulates, however, are not competent as hosts for Lyme disease spirochetes. Deer in intensely enzootic sites fail to infect vector ticks (10,11), and cattle and sheep exposed to infected vector ticks never become infectious (12). Lyme disease spirochetes infect diverse mammals, but not all of them serve as competent hosts.

Certain birds may also contribute to the transmission of Lyme disease spirochetes. Numerous vector ticks parasitize birds in nature, including spirochete-infected larval ticks that presumably acquired infection from these birds (13-19). Seabirds appear to maintain such a cycle on Arctic islands (20). In an enzootic site, American robins (Turdus migratorius) are considered to be an avian candidate as a reservoir of infection because they are locally abundant, forage in ground and brush vegetation, and are frequently infested by vector ticks (21). Catbirds (Dumetella carolinensis) in enzootic sites, however, appear not to infect vector ticks (22). Although spirochetes have been isolated from naturally infected European blackbirds (Turdus merula) (15), a laboratory study failed to demonstrate reservoir competence of these birds (23); the reason for this discrepancy remains unclear. Nymphal vector ticks occasionally become infected after feeding on spirochete-exposed pheasants (Phasianus colchicus); these birds, however, cannot contribute to transmission because larval ticks seem not to feed on them, either in the laboratory or in nature (24,25). Chickens (Gallus gallus) become infectious, but only transiently and only when they are about a week old (26). Spirochetes inoculated by syringe can be detected in various tissues of canaries (Serinus canaria), bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus), and Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix) (27-29). The competence of candidate reservoir birds as hosts for tickborne spirochetes has not been thoroughly evaluated.

Tickborne Lyme disease spirochetes may readily infect certain birds, and these birds may subsequently infect numerous vector ticks. Therefore, we determined the susceptibility of American robins to tickborne spirochetes and their subsequent infectivity for larval deer ticks (Ixodes dammini, which differ from I. scapularis [30]). American robins are suitable candidate hosts because they are infested naturally by numerous vector ticks. We evaluated the reservoir competence of captive robins and determined whether they could subsequently be reinfested and reinfected by vector ticks and whether spirochetes passaged through birds remain infective to rodents.

Materials and Methods

American robins were captured in mist nets in Brookline, MA (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Scientific Collecting Permit# MB719506-0), and maintained at 20 [degrees] with a photoperiod of 16:8 hrs (L:D) (Animal Welfare Assurance# A-3431-01). To establish that these birds had not already been infected by Lyme disease spirochetes, nymphs derived from xenodiagnostic larval deer ticks that had engorged on them were examined by dark-field microscopy. No spirochete-infected ticks were found. The birds were held in captivity for 6 months before they were exposed to infected ticks.

The colony of laboratory-raised deer ticks was originally isolated from ticks captured in Ipswich, MA, and was maintained by feeding adults on rabbits and subadults on outbred laboratory mice. To infect ticks, larvae were fed on outbred laboratory mice infected with the N40 strain of B. burgdorferi s.s. The resulting infected nymphal ticks were used to infect the robins. Xenodiagnosis was used to determine whether host animals had become infected by spirochetes; larval ticks were permitted to feed on them and the resulting nymphs were examined for spirochetes by dark-field microscopy. The larval ticks used for the xenodiagnosis were in their third generation of continuous laboratory breeding and had not previously been exposed to spirochete-infected hosts. Engorged ticks were held at 20 [+ or -] 2 [degrees] over supersaturated MgSO4 in sealed desiccator jars with 16 hours of light per day. Hatched or molted ticks remained in screened vials until they were placed on hosts 2-4 months later.

To infest the robins with subadult ticks, each bird was restrained while ticks were brushed onto its head and neck. Each bird was then placed in a cotton bag suspended over water and kept in the dark for approximately 3 hours to limit their activity. The birds were then caged individually over pans of water in cages with wire-mesh floors and fronts (Safeguard Products, New Holland, PA). The contents of the pans were inspected twice a day, and detached ticks were removed promptly. The birds were exposed three times to nymphal ticks to test their susceptibility to repeated feeding (Figure 1). The first and last of these infestations also served to infect them. Xenodiagnostic larval ticks were permitted to feed on these robins nine times during the study.

[Figure 1 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Results

To evaluate the reservoir competence of birds for Lyme disease spirochetes, we exposed each of four American robins to the bites of 12 spirochete-infected nymphal deer ticks and determined the duration of their subsequent infectivity for larval deer ticks. The presence of spirochetes in these infecting nymphs was verified by dark-field microscopic examination of the gut contents of the resulting adults; virtually all (97%) contained spirochetes. Birds were exposed initially to xenodiagnostic larvae at the same time they were exposed to the infecting nymphs. Xenodiagnosis was repeated after two days and at intervals for six months. Although larval ticks feeding simultaneously with the infected nymphs failed to acquire spirochetes, two birds infected xenodiagnostic larvae within 6 days after exposure to infected nymphs (Figure 2). All four birds were infectious to xenodiagnostic ticks that detached 12 days after exposure and infected 88% ([+ or -] 6.6) of ticks for at least another 3 weeks (Figure 2). Infectivity waned by 2 months and disappeared by 6 months. Almost all the ticks became infected that fed 2 and 4 weeks after the birds were infected (Table 1). American robins are fully but transiently competent as hosts for Lyme disease spirochetes.

[Figure 2 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Table 1. Infectivity to larval deer ticks of four American robins infected with tickborne Lyme disease spirochetes
Days from Xenodiagnostic ticks
exposure
until No. %
xenodiagnosis(a) examined infected [+ or -] SE(b)

0-5 16 0 0
6-9 28 28.6 16.5
12-15 52 84.6 7.0
20-23 78 85.9 6.0
28-30 62 91.9 6.7
39-41 50 68.0 20.3
79-82 65 13.8 10.2
189.191(c) 32 0 0
199-201 80 75.0 15.2


(a) Each interval indicates the days on which xenodiagnostic ticks detached from their hosts.

(b) SE = standard error

(c) Birds were exposed again to infected nymphal ticks on day 186.

We then determined whether American robins tolerate reinfection by tickborne spirochetes. Six months after they were initially infected, when vector ticks no longer acquired spirochetes from them, eight infected nymphs were permitted to engorge on each bird. All four robins regained infectivity for ticks within the next 2 weeks (Figure 2). Virtually all xenodiagnostic larval ticks that fed on three of these reinfected birds acquired spirochetes, and a third of them did so on the fourth bird. Although spirochete-infected robins only transiently infect vector ticks, the birds remain tolerant to reinfection.

The ability of nymphal deer ticks to reinfest American robins was evaluated by recording their feeding success. On initial exposure, 96% their feeding success. On :initial exposure, 96% of 48 nymphs feeding on the four birds engorged successfully; 98% of 40 nymphs engorged 3 weeks later; and 82% of 32 nymphs engorged 6 months later, when the birds were exposed for the third time. The robins appear to freely tolerate repeated feeding by nymphal deer ticks.

To determine whether spirochetes passaged through birds retain infectivity for mice, we permitted nymphs that had acquired infection as larvae from birds to feed on mice. The ticks that were used had acquired spirochetes 3 weeks after their avian hosts had been infected. Each of four outbred laboratory mice was exposed to six of the resulting nymphs. Two weeks later, 10 xenodiagnostic larval ticks were permitted to engorge on each of these mice. All but one of the 40 resulting nymphal ticks acquired spirochetes (Table 2). Spirochetes, therefore, remain infectious to mammals after a tickborne passage through birds.

Table 2. Infectivity for laboratory mice of Lyme disease spirochetes that had previously infected American robins
 Avian host

 Infecting nymphs Xenodiagnostic ticks(a)

Bird No. % No. % Mouse
no. ticks engorged examined infected no.
1 12 83.3 18 83.30 1
2 12 100 21 95.20 2
3 12 100 22 77.30 3
4 12 100 17 88.20 4

 Murine host

 Infecting nymphs Xenodiag ticks

Bird No. % No.
no. ticks engorged examined i
1 6 100 10
2 6 83.3 10
3 6 100 10
4 6 83.3 10


(a) Xenodiagnostic ticks that had engorged on each bird were used to infect the corresponding [ILLEGIBLE TEXT]

Discussion

A competent reservoir host for the agent of Lyme disease readily acquires [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] from vector ticks, permits spirochetes to proliferate, and readily infects vector tic white-footed mice, infection generally becomes established after a single feeding infectious [ILLEGIBLE TEXT], and more than half retain infection for approximately 6 months (3 many as three-quarters of the larval ticks that feed on such mice acquire infection which subsequently wanes. Hamsters are similarly infectious (32). The various glirids, voles, and sciurids that have been tested appear as reservoir-competent [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] spirochetes as are cricetids (2,5,6,33). Although certain genospecies of the Lyme disease spirochetes are said to be more mouse-adapted than others (34), no [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] evidence is available to support this concept. Rodents, in general, are readily [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] by Lyme disease spirochetes, and most remain infectious to vector ticks for at lea months.

The standard of proof that has been applied to rodent reservoirs of spirochetal [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] has not previously been applied to candidate avian reservoirs. Certain birds, [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] quail and canaries, can readily be infected by syringe-inoculated spirochetes. Spirochetal DNA generally becomes detectable in the viscera (27-29), and [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] spirochetes can be cultured from these tissues. Tickborne spirochetes infect [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] (24) and week-old chickens (26). About a third of these chicks infect ticks, but [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] remain infectious for only a week. Adult pheasants infect about a quarter of [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] that engorge on them. European blackbirds appear not to be susceptible to [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] infection (23). American robins, however, appear far more reservoir-competent. bitten by spirochete-infected nymphal ticks subsequently infect larval ticks, and virtually all larvae become infected after feeding on these birds throughout the following month. Infectivity declines, however, and few ticks acquire infection [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] these birds after approximately 3 months. Certain, but not all, bird species can [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] be infected by Lyme disease spirochetes and subsequently become highly but transiently infectious.

A competent reservoir host tolerates feeding by both subadult stages of vector [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] Although nymphs feed readily on pheasants, larvae seldom attach to these birds, in nature or in the laboratory (24). About as many nymphal as larval deer ticks at naturally to American robins (21). Several times as many larvae as nymphs, how feed on white-footed mice in nature (35). Nymphal vector ticks attach more [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] rats, dormice, or the American reservoir host (P. leucopus) than to European [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] (Apodemus spp.) or voles (2,3,5,31). Perhaps particular subadult stages of vector are more readily attracted to certain vertebrate animals than to others.

To be competent as reservoir hosts for Lyme disease spirochetes, an animal must tolerate repeated feedings by vector ticks. White-footed or laboratory mice serve hosts to deer ticks almost as readily during their fifth exposure as their first (36). are much less tolerant (37), and rabbits (unpub. obs.) and guinea pigs (38) seldo tolerate more than one epfsode of attachment. Vector ticks feed repeatedly on A robins as successfully as on the natural rodent reservoirs of the Lyme disease spirochete.

Spirochete-infected larval ticks frequently are taken from birds in Lyme disease-enzootic areas. Of 20 species of North American passerine birds that were [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] by larval vector ticks, 45% hosted spirochete-infected larvae (13,18). Spirochetes infected 10% to 40% of these batches of infected ticks. In Europe, 81% of 16 [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] species harbored infected ticks; of these cohorts, 11% to 75% of the larval ticks infected (17). Because Lyme disease spirochetes infect [is less than] 1% of questing larval [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] ticks captured in nature and because inherited infection is exceedingly rare (39,4 these larval ticks most likely acquired spirochetes from their avian hosts. [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] the avian host-range of Lyme disease spirochetes remains to be defined.

An effective reservoir of infection for a pathogen would generate for each [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] infection at least as many secondary infections. The contribution of various alter reservoir hosts for Lyme disease spirochetes, however, can be compared by [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] the proportion of infections in nymphal vector ticks that derive from a particular vertebrate population. This calculation includes estimates of feeding density of [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] ticks on the candidate reservoir host, its local density, and its prevalence of infect (2,5). At least twice as many vector ticks appear to acquire infection from a [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] of edible dormice (Glis glis) as from other rodents locally abundant in Central E (5). Similar evidence implicates white-footed mice in eastern North America (1). Information that would permit comparable estimates of the reservoir significance local populations of birds, however, remains unavailable. Thus, it is still [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] whether a bird, although reservoir-competent for the spirochete, may serve as an important reservoir in nature.

Because the prevalence of Lyme disease spirochetes in American robins has not been determined for a representative enzootic site, the importance of these birds reservoir hosts remains speculative. Robins may contribute to the force of [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] of the agent of Lyme disease, because these locally abundant birds are reservoir-competent and may be infested by numerous larval ticks. Of the larvae that feed peridomestic birds in North American enzootic sites, approximately three-[ILLEGIBLE TEXT] appear to engorge on robins (21). Although they may be about as abundant as [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] footed mice, robins appear to forage more frequently on lawns than do mice (21) contribution of robins to the peridomestic risk for Lyme disease may depend on [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] ability of engorged larval ticks detaching from the birds to develop in such habit Questing nymphal ticks appear less prevalent on lawns than on other vegetation [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] residential enzootic sites (41). Birds are more vagile than mice, which might [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] by diffusing infected ticks into sites in which transmission is unlikely. [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] their vagility might seed new foci of transmission, if ticks detach in sites that are suitable for their development. Certain migratory passerines have been associate long-distance dispersal of vector ticks (17-19). Robins may contribute to the [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] of Lyme disease in previously unaffected sites to the extent that the season of the migration overlaps with that of the activity of subadult vector ticks. Our finding [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] American robins are reservoir-competent for Lyme disease spirochetes warrants epizootiologic studies, including estimates of the prevalence of spirochetes in the birds in nature.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by grant Ma 942/10-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschafi and by grant AI 42402-01 from the National Institutes Health.

References

(1.) Spielman A. Lyme disease and human babesiosis: evidence incriminating and reservoir hosts. In: Englund PT, Sher A, editors. The biology of [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] New York: Alan R. Liss; 1988. p. 147-65.

(2.) Matuschka F-R, Fischer P, Heiler M, Richter D, Spielman A. Capacity of European animals as reservoir hosts for the Lyme disease spirochete. J Inf 1992;165:479-83.

(3.) Matuschka F-R, Endepols S, Richter D, Ohlenbusch A, Eiffert H, Spielma Risk of urban Lyme disease enhanced by the presence of rats. J Infect Dis 1996;174:1108-11.

(4.) Smith RP, Rand PW, Lacombe EH, Telford SR, Rich SM, Piesman J, et al Norway rats as reservoir hosts for Lyme disease spirochetes on Monhegan Maine. J Infect Dis 1993;168:687-91.

(5.) Matuschka F-R, Eiffert H, Ohlenbusch A, Spielman A. Amplifying role of dormice in Lyme disease transmission in central Europe. J Infect Dis 1994; 170:122-7.

(6.) Matuschka F-R, Allgower R, Spielman A, Richter D. Characteristics of [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] dormice that contribute to their capacity as reservoirs for Lyme disease spirochetes. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999;65:707-11.

(7.) Jaensen TGT, Talleklint L. Lyme borreliosis spirochetes in Ixodes ricinus Ixodidae) and the warying hare on isolated islands in the Baltic Sea. J Med Entomol 1996;33:339-43.

(8.) Anderson JF, Magnarelli LA, LeFebvre RB, Andreadis TG, McAninch JB, G-C, et al. Antigenically variable Borrelia burgdorferi isolated from [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] rabbits and Ixodes dentatus in rural and urban areas. J Clin Microbiol 1989;27:13-20.

(9.) Marconi RT, Liveris D, Schwartz I. Identification of novel insertion [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns, and discontinuous 23S in Lyme disease spirochetes--phylogenetic analyses of rRNA genes and [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] intergenic spacers in Borrelia japonica sp. nov. and genomic group 21038 (Borrelia andersonii sp. nov.) isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2427-34.

(10.) Matuschka F-R, Heiler M, Eiffert H, Fischer P, Lotter H, Spielman A. Diversionary role of hoofed game in the transmission of Lyme disease spirochetes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1993;48:693-9.

(11.) Telford SR, Mather TN, Moore SI, Wilson ML, Spielman A. [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] deer as reservoirs of the Lyme disease spirochete. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1988;39:105-9.

(12.) Matuschka F-R, Eiffert H, Ohlenbusch A, Richter D, Schein E, Spielman Transmission of the agent of Lyme disease on a subtropical island. [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] Medicine and Parasitology 1994;45:39-44.

(13.) Anderson JF, Johnson RC, Magnarelli LA, Hyde FW. Involvement of bird epidemiology of the Lyme disease agent Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] 1986;51:394-6.

(14.) Anderson JF, Magnarelli LA, Stafford KC. Bird-feeding ticks [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] transmit Borrelia burgdorferi that infect Syrian hamsters. J Wildl Dis 199 10.

(15.) Humair P-F, Postic D, Wallich R, Gem L. An avian reservoir (Turdus mer the Lyme borreliosis spirochetes. Zentralbl Bakteriol 1998;287:521-38.

(16.) Nakao M, Miyamoto K, Fukunaga M. Lyme disease spirochetes in Japan: enzootic transmission cycles in birds, rodents, and Ixodes persulcatus ticks Infect Dis 1994;170:878-82.

(17.) Olsen B, Jaenson TGT, Bergstrom S. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] lato-infected ticks on migrating birds. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995;61:30

(18.) Rand PW, Lacombe EH, Smith RP, Ficker J. Participation of birds in the emergence of Lyme disease in southern Maine. J Med Entomol 1998;35:2

(19.) Smith RP, Rand PW, Lacombe EH, Morris SR, Holmes DW, Caporale D of bird migration in the long-distance dispersal of Ixodes dammini, the [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] Lyme disease. J Infect Dis 1996;174:221-4.

(20.) Olsen B, Jaenson TGT, Noppa L, Bunikis J, Bergstrom S. A Lyme [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] cycle in seabirds and Ixodes uriae ticks. Nature 1993;362:340-2.

(21.) Battaly GR, Fish D. Relative importance of bird species as hosts for [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] Ixodes dammini (Atari: Ixodidae) in a suburban residential landscape of so New York State. J Med Entomol 1993;30:740-7.

(22.) Mather TN, Telford SR, MacLachlan AB, Spielman A. Incompetence of [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] as reservoirs for the Lyme disease spirochete (Borrelia burgdorferi). J Par 1989;75:66-9.

(23.) Matuschka F-R, Spielman A. Loss of Lyme disease spirochetes from Ixod ricinus ticks feeding on European blackbirds. Exp Parasitol 1992;74:151-8

(24.) Kurtenbach K, Carey D, Hoodless AN, Nuttall PA, Randolph SE. [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] pheasants as reservoirs for Lyme disease spirochetes. J Med Entomol 1998 81.

(25.) Kurtenbach K, Peacey M, Rijpkema SGT, Hoodless AN, Nuttall PA, Rand SE. Differential transmission of the genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] lato by game birds and small rodents in England. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:1169-74.

(26.) Piesman J, Dolan MC, Schriefer ME, Burkot TR. Ability of [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] infected chickens to infect ticks with the Lyme disease spirochete, [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] burgdorferi. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1996;54:294-8.

(27.) Bishop KL, Khan MI, Nielsen SW. Experimental infection of northern [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] quail with Borrelia burgdorferi. J Wildl Dis 1994;30:506-13.

(28.) Isogai E, Tanaka S. Braga IS, Itakura C, Isogai H, Kimura K, et al. [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] Borrelia garinii infection of Japanese quail. Infect Immun 1994;62:3580-2

(29.) Olsen B, Gylfe A, Bergstrom S. Canary finches (Serinus canaria) as an [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] infection model for Lyme borreliosis. Microbial Pathogenesis, 1996;20:319

(30.) Telford SR. The name Ixodes dammini epidemiologically justified. [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] Dis 1998;4:132-4.

(31.) Donahue JG, Piesman J, Spielman A. Reservoir competence of white-foot for Lyme disease spirochetes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1987;36:92-6.

(32.) Piesman J. Intensity and duration of Borrelia burgdorferi and Babesia [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] infectivity in rodent hosts. Int J Parasitol 1988;18:687-9.

(33.) Matuschka F-R, Endepols S, Richter D, Spielman A. Competence of urban reservoir hosts for Lyme disease spirochetes. J Med Entomol 1997;34:489

(34.) Humair P-I, Peter O, Wallich R, Gem L. Strain variation of Lyme disease spirochetes isolated from Ixodes ricinus ticks and rodents collected in two endemic areas in Switzerland. J Med Entomol 1995;32:433-8.

(35.) Wilson ML, Spielman A. Seasonal activity of immature Ixodes dammini [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 1985;22:408-14.

(36.) Richter D, Spielman A, Matuschka F-R. Effect of prior exposure to [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] ticks on susceptibility of mice to Lyme disease spirochetes. Appl [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] Microbiol 1998;64:4596-9.

(37.) Davidar P, Wilson M, Ribeiro JMC. Differential distribution of immature dammini (Acari: Ixodidae) on rodent hosts. J Parasitol 1989;75:898-904.

(38.) Nazario S, Das S, de Silva AM, Deponte K, Marcantonio N, Anderson JF, Prevention of Borrelia burgdorferi transmission in guinea pigs by tick [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998;58:780-5.

(39.) Matuschka F-R, Schinkel TW, Klug B, Spielman A, Richter D. Failure of ticks to inherit Borrelia afzelii infection. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:91.

(40.) Piesman J, Donahue JG, Mather TN, Spielman A. Transovarially acquired disease spirochetes (Borrelia burgdorferi) in field-collected larval Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 1986;23:219.

(41.) Frank DH, Fish D, Moy FH. Landscape features associated with Lyme [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] risk in a suburban residential environment. Landscape Ecol 1998;13:27-36

Dania Richter,(*)([dagger]) Andrew Spielman,(*) Nicholas Komar,(*) and Franz-Rainer Matuschka(*)([dagger])

(*) Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; and ([dagger]) Charite, Medizinische Fakultat der Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Germany

Dr. Richter is a postdoctoral fellow conducting joint research in the laboratories Matuschka at the Charite Medical School, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, and Spielman, at the Harvard School of Public Health. Her research interests focus [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] immunologic and molecular interface of the host-vector-pathogen relationship in epizootiology of Lyme disease.

Address for correspondence: Dania Richter, Institut fur Pathologie, Charite, Medizinische Fakultat der Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Malteserstra[Beta]e 74-10[ILLEGIBLE TEXT]12249 Berlin, Germany; fax: 49-30-776-2085; e-mail: dania.richter@charite.de
COPYRIGHT 2000 U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Matuschka, Franz-Rainer
Publication:Emerging Infectious Diseases
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Mar 1, 2000
Words:4028
Previous Article:Vaccines for mucosal immunity to combat emerging infectious diseases.
Next Article:Vibrio cholerae O139 in Calcutta, 1992-1998: incidence, antibiograms, and genotypes.
Topics:


Related Articles
At the drop of a tick: a corps of Lyme-disease fighters meets its match in an army of arthropods.
Lyme Disease Surveillance in England and Wales, 1986-1998.
Genospecies Diversity of Lyme Disease Spirochetes in Rodent Reservoirs.
American Robins as Reservoir Hosts for Lyme Disease Spirochetes.
Response to Dr. Randolph and Drs. Gern and Humair.
Risk for Human Tick-Borne Encephalitis, Borrelioses, and Double Infection in the Pre-Ural Region of Russia.
Co-feeding transmission and its contribution to the perpetuation of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia afzelii. (Research).
Co-feeding transmission and its contribution to the perpetuation of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia afzelii. (Letters).
Co-feeding transmission and its contribution to the perpetuation of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia afzelii. (Letters).
Lyme microbe forms convenient bond with tick protein.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |