Printer Friendly

Compensation committee passes Sec. 162(m) muster with recusal of non-outside directors.

The IRS has ruled that a compensation committee consisting of at least two outside directors, along with a number of non-outside directors, will satisfy the Sec. 162(m) performance-based compensation requirements if the non-outside directors recuse themselves from the performance goal process (Letter Ruling 9811029).

Performance-Based Compensation

Sec. 162(m) generally provides that no deduction is allowed to any publicly held corporation for employee remuneration in excess of $1 million paid to any covered employee (the CEO or any of the four other highest paid officers for whom compensation must be reported under SEC rules). Certain types of remuneration, however, including "qualified performance-based compensation," are exempt from the disallowance rule.

Qualified performance-based compensation is compensation that meets the following requirements:

* It is paid solely on account of attaining one or more preestablished, objective performance goals.

* The performance goal is established by a "compensation committee" comprised solely of two or more "outside directors" (Sec. 162(m)(4) (C)(i);Regs. Sec. 1.162-27(e)(3)).

* The material terms of the performance goal under which the compensation is to be paid are disclosed to and approved by the shareholders in a separate vote before the payment is made.

* Prior to payment, the compensation committee certifies that the performance goals and any other material terms were satisfied.

Compensation committee: A compensation committee is the committee of directors--including any subcommittee of directors--of the publicly held corporation with authority to set and administer performance goals and to certify that performance goals are attained (Regs. Sec. 1.162-27(c)(4)).

Outside director: An outside director is one who:

* Is not a current employee of the corporation;

* Is not a former employee of the corporation currently receiving compensation for prior services (other than benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan) during the tax year;

* Has not been an officer of the publicly held corporation; and

* Does not receive remuneration (directly or indirectly) in any capacity other than as a director.

Stock options: Under Regs. Sec. 1.162-27(e)(2)(vi), compensation from the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights (SARs) is deemed to satisfy the performance goal requirement if:

* The grant is made by the compensation committee;

* The plan states that maximum number of shares with respect to which options or SARs may be granted during a specified period to any employee; and

* The amount of compensation received by the employee is based solely on an increase in the value of the stock after the date of grant.

Abstention or Recusal of Non-Outside Directors

The employer in Letter Ruling 9811029 is a publicly held corporation with a shareholder-approved stock option plan. Apart from the outside director requirement, the plan meets all the criteria of Regs. Sec. 1.162-27(e)(2)(vi), so that compensation under the plan will otherwise qualify as qualified performance-based compensation. The corporation's compensation committee consists of at least two directors who qualify as outside directors under Regs. Sec. 1.162-27(e), plus several other individuals who do not qualify as outside directors. The corporation intends to grant stock options in 1998. To comply with the requirements for performance-based compensation, and to ease the administrative burdens and costs of maintaining separate committees or a separate subcommittee, the corporation proposes an abstention or recusal of all directors on the compensation committee who do not qualify as outside directors under the regulations.

The Service ruled that, after such an abstention or recusal, the corporation will have what amounts to a subcommittee of two or more outside directors under Regs. Sec. 1.162-27(c)(4), and that this subcommittee will be considered a compensation committee consisting solely of two or more outside directors for purposes of Sec. 162(m)(4)(C)(i) and the regulations thereunder.
COPYRIGHT 1998 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:IRC s. 162(m)
Author:Yurkovic, Denis L.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Jun 1, 1998
Words:620
Previous Article:Coordinated issue paper gives guidance on underground storage tanks.
Next Article:Treasury fulfills promise to issue Brown Group partnership regulations.
Topics:


Related Articles
Proposed Section 162(m) regulations on deductions for executive compensation.
The $1 million cap on compensation deductions.
Unreasonable compensation in PSCs.
Sec. 162(m)(4) compensation limits.
Performance-based compensation.
Circuit courts debate reasonable compensation.
Noncompete agreement entered into contemporaneously with stock redemption.
What is reasonable compensation?
FSA 200107012: new standard for deducting qualified plan contributions?
What is reasonable compensation?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters