Comparison of salivary cortisol concentrations in Jaguars kept in captivity with differences in exposure to the public/Comparacao das concentracoes de cortisol salivar em oncas-pintadas criadas em cativeiro com diferencas de exposicao ao publico.
The reprehension of institutions involved in fauna conservation has resulted several times in an exceeding accumulation of big felids, which have a difficult maintenance. There is an increased effort to set part of the jaguar (Panthera onca) breed kept in captivity to be reintroduced in its natural habitat (SANDERSON et al., 2002). However, some animals can not be reintroduced to nature due to long captivity periods, lesions incurred during their life, behavioral idiosyncrasies and contamination by urban pathogens that could be disseminated within the wild population (CUNNINGHAM, 1996). Although these captive animals can be used in environmental awareness programs and for recreational means in zoos, they are housed in the most diverse conditions. Another purpose, for both zoos and other raising facilities, is to foment databases of physiological data, such as the levels of salivary cortisol, as a reference to studies in captivity and in natural settings.
The success of raising wild animals depends in great part on the conditions they are kept in. For jaguars, theses conditions are far from being completely understood, even though some studies have suggested efficient models (JAGUAR SSP MANAGEMENT GROUP, 2007). It is known that these animals need space, shelter, refuge and environmental enrichment in order to satisfy their behavioral needs (JAGUAR SSP MANAGEMENT GROUP, 2007). Although jaguars are considered sensible to routine changes and noise, paradoxically they seem to ignore exposure to public (JAGUAR SSP MANAGEMENT GROUP, 2007). In practice, reports from animal caretakers and zoo staff describes a tendency of jaguars to be readjust to human presence as compared to lions and pumas, for example (Cristina Gianni, NEX). A solitary, territorial life, in great forest expanses usually associated to water courses (POLISAR et al., 2003), could account to the predisposition of jaguars to this readjustment.
Zoos are supposed to have public visitation, however, this may incur in disturbs to the animals routine (ROSS et al., 2005). In cases of environment perturbations to some felid species submitted to exposure to public, there can be signs of low welfare and stress (WIELEBNOWSKI, 2003). One parameter used to evaluate welfare and stress is the levels of corticosteroid hormones (cortisol or corticosterone). These hormones are generated by a cascade of biochemical events that originate in a primary stimulation of the limbic system, by emotional responses of defense and prolonged frustration (MORGAN & TROMBORG, 2007 TILBROOK & CLARKE, 2006). The final outcome is the stimulation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis to increase the plasmic cortisol (TILBROOK & CLARKE, 2006). Animals in low stimuli, threatening and uncomfortable environments have high levels of corticosteroids (WIELEBNOWSKI, 2003; TILBROOK & CLARKE, 2006). High indices of plasmic, fecal, and salivary cortisol can be associated to psychological stress in several wild felids, as well, as domestic cats (NOGUEIRA & SILVA, 1997; CAUVIN et al., 2003; MORATO et al., 2004).
Due jaguars are particularly secretive towards human contact in their natural habitat (SCHALLER & CRAWSHAW Jr, 1980), this study tried to evaluate the impact in salivary cortisol levels of captive jaguars, as an indicative of stress and welfare, under high and moderate exposure to public.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Jaguars were evaluated in the Brasilia Zoo (BZ), Brasilia, and in the conservationist breeding facility "No Extinction" (NEX), in Pirenopolis, both in the Brazilian central highlands. The BZ group was composed of three jaguars: one 19 year old female (Juma), a 7 year old male (General), Juma's progeny , and another male of unknown origin, 8 years old (Tuan) approximately. Feeding was done with chunks of meat (bovine and chicken) at the end of the day, Mondays Wednesday and Fridays, at which time they are also removed to sleeping chambers, where they are kept until the next morning. The jaguar's keep is built of concrete, eleven meters deep, circular and with a 250[m.sup.2] area. It has two raised platforms (two meters high from the ground), an internal moat filed with water around the external perimeter of the keep, and an island in the center with shrubs. There were four gated subterranean rooms with access to the main area which were used for isolation and animals restraint. Zoo visitors have access to the keep on the top of the structure around the entirety of the perimeter, separated by metal bars which are distant one meter from the border of the main keep.
In the NEX, four jaguars were evaluated: three were kept together and one housed alone. The three animals kept together were composed by two females (Carlota and Dalila) and one male (Samson), all five years old and raised in captivity since birth. The remaining animal was an adult male (Gaviao), of unknown age, in captivity for at least six years. Gaviao was apprehended by Brazilian Institute of Environment officers in a farm where it was kept chained for "protection of the property". At the moment of apprehension it was noted that Gaviao had been declawed and castrated by the farmer. Animals at NEX are fed daily at the end of the day (bovine and equine meats, and poultry). The keep is set up as large enclosure surrounded by a thick metal mesh, containing in its interior trees, an artificial grotto to be used as refuge, a catwalk three meters high and an artificial pond of approximately 30[m.sup.2]. The ground is covered in grass. Access for visitors is made at the same level as the animals. Visitors can get as close as two meters from the keep and are further separated by a secondary metal screen that keeps out even small animals, such as birds and rodents.
All jaguars observed have no history of metabolic issues or any other major health problem. At time of sampling, jaguars were deemed in good health by a team of veterinarians.
The public visitation is higher in BZ than NEX. Except on Mondays, the public visitation is every day on aweek , and it is highest at weekends with approximately two thousands people. The estimative of NEX public visitation is around 30 people at weekends (Saturdays and Sundays), and no visits happen at the rest of the week. The non-visit days for the BZ and for NEX jaguars were Mondays and Wednesday to Friday, respectively.
Salivary cortisol is a non invasive reliable method to measure the cortisol profile related to environmental stimulus in wild animals in captivity (FUCHS et al., 1997; CROSS & ROGERS, 2004). suited the method of salivary cortisol collection used on pigs, primates and others animals was suited to jaguars. Saliva sampling was done using soft balls made of resistant, inert and absorbent cotton tissue to be chewed by the animals. The balls have approximately 15cm of diameter, and are made of non-flavored cotton tissue and enrolled with ties of resistant canvas. The sampling balls were throwing to the animals and the manipulation and chewing were observed. These were eventually retrieved and chewed on by the animals. After 30 minutes the ball removed from the enclosure had approximately 5mL of saliva squeezed from them into assay tubes. Saliva was kept frozen at -20[degrees]C until laboratory analysis. This technique had been previously tested and the quality and quantity of the sample were deemed adequate for this analysis. Sampling was done from the months of March to May 2007, between the hours of 8 and 9am, with the jaguars fasting for at least 24 hours. Samples from BZ were obtained on Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursdays, with three repetitions for each day of the week. Sampling at NEX was done from Wednesday to Monday, on a consecutive daily basis. On total, nine samples were taken from each jaguar located at BZ, and six from each jaguar at the NEX. Sampling was performed consistently and in the same order, always by the same researchers.
All cortisol measurements were made at the same time in the same assay, using an immunoenzymatic system (DSL10--67100/Active, USA) by Laboratorio Genese (Sao Paulo, Brazil). The laboratory used the regular procedure according to technical recommendations. In short, after thawing, the sample vials were centrifuged at 1000G for two minutes to produce a clear supernatant, which was aspired with a micropipette (approximately 30[micro]L). Immediately the supernatant was dropped into tubes, shaken for 45min and appropriately discarded. The plates were washed and incubated with a solution (TMB chromogen) for 15min. Cortisol levels were determined by employing a time-resolved enzymatic immunoassay, where cortisol in standards and unknowns competed for antibody binding sites. The bound cortisol was measured using an optical density microplate reader at 450nm (Dynatech MR 5000, Dynatech Laboratories, USA).
A Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine the difference (if any) in the salivary cortisol levels between the two groups of jaguars. Samples were also classified according to visitation level (with and without visitation) at day of sampling and tested for differences within each group of jaguars.
The possibility of a linear relationship between salivary cortisol and the intensity of visitation were tested. The Spearman correlation test was used. Values used were the mean and standard error of sampling in each day for each animal; when necessary measurements from jaguars in each site were grouped. It was assumed alpha equals or smaller to 5% and a two-tailed distribution.
There were no differences between the measured cortisol levels within each group of jaguars (BZ, P=0.49; NEX, P=0.12). When both groups of jaguars were compared to each other, BZ showed the highest salivary cortisol concentration (Figure 1). According to visitations per day, the BZ zoo showed the highest salivary cortisol concentrations in days of increased visitation (Figure 2). On jaguars of the NEX group there were no significant differences on salivary cortisol in days with different visitation intensity (P =0.22).
There seemed to be a gradation on salivary cortisol levels in each day of the week, which prompted to test this using with a Spearman correlation test. There was a significant correlation between salivary cortisol levels and the day of the week it was sampled in for the BZ group (rho=0.42; P =0.01), but not for the NEX group (rho=0.05; P =0.98).
The salivary cortisol level in jaguars from BZ group was higher then from jaguars of NEX group. Considering that the jaguars management, the age-sex class and genetic makeup are convergent for the NEX and BZ groups, precluding other sharp differences, the difference in salivary cortisol between each group of jaguars can be explained by the intensity of the visitation received, which was markedly different in each site studied. In several s domestic species and wild mammals, salivary cortisol is correlated to plasmic cortisol (domestic dog: BEERDA et al., 1996; guinea pig: FENSKE, 1996; rhesus monkey: DAVENPORT et al., 2003; dolphins: PEDERNERA-ROMANO et al., 2006) and its increasing is tied to distress, being consequence tied to the animal's welfare (LANE, 2006).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Natural behavioral characteristics tend to be preserved while the animal is in captivity (CLUBB & MASON, 2007). Frustration on performing the characteristic behavioral repertoire in the animals generates a neuron-endocrine predisposition to low levels of welfare. In its natural habitat, jaguars have a solitary and secretive behavior, being more active at dusk and over night, with predatory strategies of sudden attack (POLISAR et al., 2003). Exposure to intense visitation is directly opposite to what these animal are selected in their natural environment to do. Even when living in an ergonomically planned environment to house big felids, the increased levels of salivary cortisol in the BZ animals seems to indicate a lack of adaptation to captivity on theses animals.
On the other hand, we can not discard the possibility of enclosures differences influencing the cortisol response. There is a plethora of studies showing different cortisol profile of animals in different enclosures designs (CLUBB & MASON, 2007). It was suggested in this case, that the BZ jaguars place on the bottom of the enclosure is not suited to behavioral needs of jaguars. Most specifically, jaguar's refuges are on top of tress in nature (SCHALLER & CRAWSHAW, 1980). In the BZ enclosures, they are exposed on the bottom, without free access to refuges and surrounded by noisy visitors. In this case, the problem could not be the number of visitors but the place of them in relation to observed jaguars.
In comparison to the BZ facilities, visitors remain at the same level as the jaguars in the NEX, with a decreased safety area around the housing facilities, which allow a greater proximity of the public. Although having this seemingly higher exposure to the public, the jaguars in the NEX did not present higher salivary cortisol levels in periods of increased visitation. Also, cortisol levels were stably maintained during the week, without any indication of variation associated to any period in the week. By contrast, besides having significantly higher salivary cortisol levels on days with visitation, the animals in the BZ presented progressively increasing levels as the days of increased visitation approached.
On the BZ jaguars, the long captivity time and the increased exposure to the public could have induced a habituation state, like several species maintained in captivity (VAN KRUNKELSVEN et al., 1999). The increased cortisol levels in the jaguars housed in the BZ facilities indicates that they have not habituated themselves with this increased human exposure. These results allow us to raise questions regarding the ideal number of visitors per day for jaguars kept in captivity, with an exact number yet to be determined, and still maintain their environment in reasonable level of well being. Alternatively, a more practical solution to this welfare issue is the adequate provision of protected parts of enclosure in which jaguars could escape from public exposure.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
We thank the FUNPEB staff, Wedina M. B. Pereira, Germana M. C. L. Reis, Antonio Soares de Paula, Raul Gonzales Acosta for their help during the experiment. We are grateful to Luana de Aguiar Paes, Patricia Maria Silva Soares Coelho and Joao Paulo Gravina Ribeiro Castro for the assistance in data collection. The research was supported by a grant from Fundo de Pesquisa of the Decanato de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao of the University of Brasilia, and Programa Institucional de Bolsas de Extensao, UnB, CNPq, 2008.
BIOETHICS AND BIOSSECURITY COMMITTEE APPROVAL
The study was approved by the Animal Use Committee (CEUA) of the Brasilia University in line with IBAMA statement (Brazilian Institute of Environmental Protection). All procedures were not invasive and performed under veterinarian supervision.
Recieved 06.29.08 Approved 02.16.09
BEERDA, B. et al. The use of saliva cortisol, urinary cortisol, and catecholamine measurements for a noninvasive assessment of stress responses in dogs. Hormones and Behavior, v.30, p.272-279, 1996. Disponivel em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science? _ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WGC45MH0JB1K&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search &_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10& md5=860a81fe9f1585b28cb52f5206df01ae>. Acesso em: 12 fev. 2009. Doi: 10.1006/ hbeh.1996.0033.
CAUVIN, A.L. et al. The urinary corticoid:creatinine ratio (UCCR) in healthy cats undergoing hospitalization. Journal of Feline Medicine & Surgery, v.5, n.6, p.329-333, 2003. Disponivel em: <http://www. sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WJC-49FB2YC1 &_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221 &_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=ecde89953403144a94ab688d4636cb27>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1016/S1098-612X(03)00067-6.
CLUBB, R.; MASON, G.J. Natural behavioural biology as a risk factor in carnivore welfare: how analyzing species differences could help zoos improve enclosures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.102, p.303-328, 2007. Disponivel em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T48-4KJDWNC1 &_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221 &_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=d32a26e5cb396493d2829a800794197f>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.033.
CROSS, N.; ROGERS, L.J. Diurnal cycle in salivary cortisol levels in common marmosets. Developmental Psychobiology, v.45, n.3, p.134-139, 2004. Disponivel em:<http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/109741297/ abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1002/dev.20023.
CUNNINGHAM, A.A. Disease risks of wildlife translocations. Conservation Biology, v.10, n.2, p.349-353, 1996. Disponivel em: <http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119217808/ abstract>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1046/ j.1523-1739.1996.10020349.x.
DAVENPORT, M.D. et al. Continuity and change in emotional reactivity in Rhesus monkeys throughout the prepubertal period. Motivation and Emotion, v.27, n.1, p.57-70, 2003. Disponivel em:<http://www.springerlink.com/content/h00u82376642j134/>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1023/ A:1023626425807.
FENSKE, M. Saliva cortisol and testosterone in the guinea pig: Measures for the endocrine function of adrenals and testes? Steroids, v.61, p.647-650, 1996. Disponivel em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TC93W28KW96&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search &_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=197 092286632d8c9f887bbb284e41bcf>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1016/S0039-128X(96)00185-7.
JAGUAR SPECIES SURVIVAL PLAN. Guidelines for Captive Management of Jaguars. Norristown: Elmwood Park Zoo, Christopher Law (editor), 2007. 91p. Disponivel em:http://jaguarssp.org/Animal%20Mgmt/JAGUAR%20GUIDELINES.pdf#page=17.
FUCHS, E. et al. Salivary cortisol: a non-invasive measure of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical activity in the squirrel monkey, Saimiri sciureus. Laboratory Animals, v.31, p.306311, 1997. Disponivel em: <http://la.rsmjournals.com/cgi/reprint/31/4/306>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1258/ 002367797780596077.
LANE, J. Can non-invasive glucocorticoid measures be used as reliable indicators of stress in animals? Animal Welfare, v.15, n.4, p.331-342, 2006.
MORATO, R. G.et al. Changes in the fecal concentrations of cortisol and androgen metabolites in captive male jaguars (Panthera onca) in response to stress. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, v.37, n.12, p.1903-1907, 2004. Disponivel em: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0100-89X2004001 200017&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2004001200017.
MORGAN, K.N.; TROMBORG, C.T. Sources of stress in captivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.102, p.262302, 2007. Disponivel em:< http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL &_udi=B6T48-4KGPP391&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c &_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5= 45f5d706b0cee7 a83f7dda8aad03eb5>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032.
NOGUEIRA, G.P.; SILVA, J.C. Plasma cortisol levels in captive wild felines after chemical restraint. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, v.30, n.11, p.1359-1361, 1997. Disponivel em:< http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0100879X199700 1100016&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X1997001100016.
PERDENERA-ROMANO, C. et al. Salivary cortisol in captive dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): a non-invasive technique. Animal Welfare, v.15, p.359-362, 2006.
POLISAR, J. et al. Jaguars, pumas, their prey base, and cattle ranching: ecological interpretations of a management problem. Biological Conservation, v.109, p.297-310, 2003. Disponivel em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V5X-46DFRHJ6&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt= &_orig=search&_sort=d&view= c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0& _userid=10&md5=a254eb486a571224e340386bc279da6e> Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00157-X .
ROSS, S. et al. A note on the influence of visitors on the behaviour and welfare of zoo-housed gorillas. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.93, n.1-2, p.13-17, 2005. Disponivel em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T484GTVYC7-2 &_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221 &_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=fd1ad6559746c9a6cae4da64aef0f89b>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.019.
SANDERSON, E.W. et al. Planning to save a species: the jaguar as a model. Conservation Biology, v.16, n.1, p.58-72, 2002. Disponivel em: <http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/ 118954096/abstract>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00352.x.
SCHALLER, G.B.; CRAWSHAW, P.G. Movement patterns of jaguar. Biotropica, v.12, p.161-168, 1980.
TILBROOK, A.J.; CLARKE, I.J. Neuroendocrine mechanisms of innate states of attenuated responsiveness of the hypothalamopituitary adrenal axis to stress. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, v.27, p.285-307, 2006. Disponivel em : <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WFS-4KPX8ND1 &_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version= 1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=d0773a6e460bde37f677249af0673333->. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2006.06.002.
VAN KRUNKELSVEN, E. et al. Habituation of bonobos (Pan paniscus): first reactions to the presence of observers and the evolution of response over time. Folia Primatologica, v.70, n.6, p.365-368, 1999. Disponivel em: <http://content.karger.com/produktedb/ produkte.asp?typ=fulltext&file=fpr70365>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.1159/000021720.
WIELEBNOWSKI, N. Stress and distress: evaluating their impact for the well-being of zoo animals. Journal of the Veterinary Medical Association, v.223, p.973-976, 2003. Disponivel em: <http://avmajournals.avma.org/doi/abs/10.2460/javma.2003.223.973>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2009. Doi: 10.2460/javma.2003.223.973.
Julio Cesar Montanha (I) Sergio Leme Silva (II) Vanner Boere (III)
(I) Faculdade de Ciencias Biologicas, Instituto de Biologia (IB), Universidade de Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, DF, Brasil.
(II) Laboratorio de Psicobiologia, Instituto de Psicologia, UnB, Brasilia, DF, Brasil.
(III) Departamento de Ciencias Fisiologicas, IB, UnB, 70910-900, Brasilia, DF, Brasil. E-mail: email@example.com. Autor para correspondencia.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Montanha, Julio Cesar; Silva, Sergio Leme; Boere, Vanner|
|Date:||Sep 1, 2009|
|Previous Article:||Heavy metals in cattle biological samples/Metais pesados em amostras biologicas de bovinos.|
|Next Article:||Aortic body tumors in dogs from Northern Parana, Brazil/Tumores do corpo aortico em caes do Norte do Parana, Brasil.|