Printer Friendly

Comparison of Hygienic and Grooming Behaviors of Indigenous and Exotic Honeybee (Apis mellifera) Races in Central Saudi Arabia.

Byline: HASSAN M. BALHARETH, ABDULAZIZ S. ALQARNI AND AYMAN A. OWAYSS

ABSTRACT

Hygienic and grooming behaviors of native and exotic honeybee races reared in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia were investigated. Both races exhibited different rates of hygienic behavior. After 24 h the removal of dead brood in native race was significantly higher than that of exotic one being 85.28 and 43.84%, respectively. However, after 48 h the native race significantly removed 97.60% of brood, while exotic one removed 79.32%. After 72 h the removal was 99.78 and 93.29% for native and exotic races, respectively. Time consumed to detect and remove dead brood in colonies of the two races was variable i.e., native race differentiated and removed dead brood faster than exotic one. Deformed Varroa mites, as a result of grooming behavior, were significantly higher in colonies of native race than those of exotic one being 31.13 and 11.27%, respectively.

Leg-deformed mites in native and exotic colonies were 62.94 and 56.29%, and deformities in dorsal shield were 37.18 and 36.32% for the two races, respectively without significant differences. The remarkable defensive behavior exhibited by the native race, compared to that of exotic one, may be due to its different genetic structure as well as its compatibility with local environmental conditions. (c) 2012 Friends Science Publishers

Key Words: Hygienic; Grooming; Varroa destructor; Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION

The haemolymph-feeding mite, Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman), is the most serious pest threatening honeybees worldwide (Lodesani et al., 1992). This ectoparasitic mite was recorded in Saudi Arabia in 1987, and is found in all beekeeping areas causing great damages to bee colonies (Al-Ghamdi, 1990). Most beekeepers in Saudi Arabia often move their colonies to moderate areas and to flowering pastures (Alqarni, 1995). Therefore, infection with the varroa mite was continuously spreading. Besides, keeping bees in traditional log hives prevents beekeeper from efficient control of this mite. Different methods have been applied to manage this mite in modern hives including mechanical, chemical and natural procedures. Although chemical methods reduced the mite infestation and succeeded to a great extent, resistance of mite to most acaricides used for control was a significant problem. Also, chemical abuse leads to improper residues in hive products e.g., honey and beeswax (Wallner, 1999).

Depending on alternative techniques in controlling Varroa mite, natural materials e.g., essential oils and botanical extracts were utilized and variable efficiencies were achieved (Imdorf et al., 1995; Sammataro et al., 1998; Omar et al., 2001) as well as integrated management of the mite (Owayss, 2002).

Naturally, honey bee developed some mechanisms to defense invaders. The term "hygienic behavior" was originally first mentioned by Rothenbuhler (1964) and means the ability of worker bees to identify the dead brood and remove it off the cell, thus reduce the infestation (Peng et al., 1987). The removal behavior of infected brood exhibited by workers of certain honeybee races is a focused approach to minimize the mite population (Spivak, 1996). Hygienic behavior is not only directed toward dead brood, but also towards the brood infected with bacteria or fungi (Boecking and Spivak, 1999), the greater wax moth (Villegas and Villa, 2006), the small hive beetle (Neuman and Hartels, 2004). The other defensive mechanism is "grooming behavior" where about 20% of adult workers of 15 20 days- old remove Varroa mites from their own bodies (auto- grooming) or from nestmates (allo-grooming).

Distinct mite grooming has been shown in A. cerana, the original host of the mite, whereas A. mellifera exhibits this behavior to a lesser extent (Peng et al., 1987; Boecking and Spivak, 1999; Arathi et al., 2000; Arathi and Spivak, 2001).

These two defensive behaviors were studied in different honeybee races and hybrids e.g., A. m. carnica, A. m. ligustica, A. m. caucasica, A. m. syriaca, A. m. lamarckii and A.m. meda. Variable results related to racial performance, seasonal fluctuations and other factors were reported (Lodesani et al., 1996; Abdel-Wahab, 2001; Kamel et al., 2003; Omran, 2004; Hussein et al., 2005; Abou El- Enain, 2006; Amro, 2009; Zaitoun and Al-Ghzawi, 2009; Nagafgholian et al., 2011). Increasing Varroa-hygienic behavior by selective breeding enables controlling mite to a stable parasite-host relationship (Rosenkranz et al., 2010). Different Varroa-hygienic bee lines have been successfully bred (Harbo and Harris, 1999 and 2005; Spivak and Reuter, 2001; Buchler et al., 2010).

Few researches concerning defensive behavior of the indigenous honeybee race was conducted (e.g., Khanbash, 2001; Al-Ghamdi, 2002; Al-Medani, 2004). The present work aimed to evaluate the hygienic and grooming behaviors of the native bee race, A.m. jemenitica, compared to the most imported one, A.m. carnica, to Saudi Arabia. These two traits are important indicators for disease resistance in selection and breeding programs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Site of the experiment: This research was carried out during May, 2011 in a private apiary situated in Al-Hair, about 30 km south of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Honeybee races and colonies: Two groups of equal strength honeybee colonies reared in wooden Langstroth hives were tested. The 1st group was headed by queens of native race, A.m. jemenitica and the second group with hybrid Carniolan, A.m. carnica, queens imported from Egypt. Ordinarily beekeeping practices including necessary supplementary feeding were conducted. The tested colonies were naturally infested with Varroa mites, and no Varroa control treatments were applied.

Assessment of hygienic behavior: Four honeybee colonies/ race were experimented for their hygienic behavior. An area (2.5 x 2.5 cm) of centered sealed worker brood (100 cell/1 comb/colony) was bordered and killed by piercing a fine wooden pin into each cell and then the comb was returned to its hive (Sammataro, 1996). The percentages of brood removal in each colony were recorded after 24, 48 and 72 h. Three experiments were conducted consequently with one week interval.

Assessment of grooming behavior: The former four honeybee colonies were also experimented three times with one week interval for their grooming behavior. A plastic sheet coated with Vaseline was placed onto each hive bottom board and separated with a screen mesh to prevent Varroa individuals from escape or climbing back to the brood frames. After 3 days, dropped mature female mites, depending on color, were separated, counted and examined for any deformity using a microscopic magnification at the Bee Research Unit, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University.

Statistical analysis: Experiments were randomized complete blocks designed under the same conditions during the study period. Data were analyzed and mean values were tested for significance following Snedecor and Cochran (1981) and SAS, 2008 software was applied.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Hygienic behavior of native and exotic honeybees: The removal of artificially killed worker brood (%) was considered as an indicator of hygienic behavior. Data illustrated in (Table I) compares the hygienic behavior in the tested honeybee races; A.m. jemenitica (AJ) and A.m. carnica (AC) after 24, 48 and 72 of killing the brood. It was found that both races exhibited hygienic behavior, but with different rates. After 24 h, the % general mean of removal in AJ was significantly higher than that of AC being 85.28 and 43.84% for the two races, respectively. Also, variance between the two values was +94.55%. After 48 h, workers of AJ removed 97.60% of brood, while those of AC removed 79.32% with significant difference, and the variance was +23.61%. After 72 h, the removal rates were 99.78 and 93.29% for AJ and AC, respectively without significant difference.

It is worth noting that time needed to detect and remove brood in colonies of the two races was variable i.e., native race differentiated and removed dead brood faster than exotic one in the same period. Thus, this trait could be used as an indicator for selection of colonies with hygienic behavior. Al-Ghamdi (2002) found that A.m. jemenitica removed 100% of dead brood through 24 h, while A.m. carnica removed only 55% in the same period. Hygienic behavior is greatly different among and within bee populations and subspecies (Spivak and Gilliam, 1998 a and b). Kamel et al. (2003) mentioned that A.m. lamarckii removed 72.5% of dead brood, while it was 35.6% for A.m. carnica, but after 24 h they were 90.5 and 59.4% for the two races, respectively. Al-Medani (2004) reported that A.m. jemenitica removed 85.5% of dead brood during 48 h. Hygienic behavior is the first defense mechanism in honeybee against at least two diseases; American foulbrood and chalk brood.

Hygienic bees differentiae and remove the infected brood before sporulation of the pathogen. Two variable genes were suggested to be responsible for this behavior; one gene for uncapping cells and the other one for removing diseased brood (Rothenbuhler, 1964). Mortiz (1988) reported that there are many genetic factors responsible for this complicated behavior which is expressed in a phenotype. On the other hand, Lapidge et al. (2002) proposed that there are seven genetic loci controlling hygienic behavior, which is very obvious in A. cerana. These bees remove Varroa mites of infected brood and stop reproductive cycle as well as killing immature stages (Fries et al., 1994). Africanized bees significantly removed infected pupae more than European ones at the same area in Brazil. Dead pupae were removed from plastic combs faster than those in wax ones (Boecking and Drescher, 1992).

Sensitivity to odors of diseased brood is increased in bees exhibit hygienic behavior. This mechanism is enhanced by the modulatory effect of octopamine, a noradrenaline-like neuromodulator (Goode et al., 2006).

Thus, selection neuromodulator (Goode et al., 2006). Thus, selection jemenitica to increase its defensive behavior and other desirable traits.

Grooming behavior: Deformed mature Varroa female mites fallen onto hive bottom boards were taken as an indicator of grooming behavior in the two tested races. Data illustrated in (Table II) show the % of deformed mites.

The % general mean of deformed mites was significantly higher in AJ colonies than that of AC ones being 31.13 and 11.27% for the two races, respectively. Al-Ghamdi (2002) reported that deformed mites were 35.54 and 33.14% in A.m. jemenitica and A.m. carnica, respectively.

These close values may be due to variations among populations and/or low purity of the two races. Omran (2004) showed that deformed mites were 37.3 and 30.2% for A.m. lamarkii, and the most deformities in Varroa mites were in legs being67.2 and 77.2% in two successive years for the same race. Al-Ghzawi et al. (2001) reported that deformed mites were 25.7, 13.5 and 11.2% in A.m. syriaca, A.m. carnica and A.m. ligustica, respectively. Also, Zaitoun and Al-Ghzawi (2009) found that these values were 19.75, 11.50 and 10.75% deformed mites for the same races, respectively.

The leg-deformed mites in AC colonies were higher than those of AJ ones i.e., general means were 62.94 and 56.29% for the two races, respectively (Table III), with no significant differences. This type of deformity is common, since the first three pairs of legs is the most impaired parts of the attacked mites by the bees (Abdel-Wahab, 2001; Al- Ghzawi et al., 2001). Collected mites from the debris of the colony were leg-deformed by 62.5% (Al-Medani, 2004).On the other hand, values of dorsal shield-deformed means were 37.18 and 36.32%, respectively (Table IV) without significant difference. Al-Medani (2004) reported that deformity in A.m. jemenitica was 13% of both legs and dorsal shield. The remarkable defensive behavior exhibited by the native race may be due to its genetic variability in mite-resistance compared to exotic one (Al-Otaibi, 2008) as well as adaptation with native environmental conditions (Alqarni, 2006; Ali, 2011).

CONCLUSION

Honey bee races, A.m. jemenitica and A.m. carnica hybrid, exhibited different rates of hygienic behavior. The removal of dead brood in native race was significantly higher than that of exotic one. The deformed mites as a result of grooming behavior were also significantly higher in colonies of native race than those of exotic one. The surpassing defensive behavior of the native race, compared to the exotic one, may be due to its different genetic structure as well as its compatibility with local

Table I: Hygienic behavior expressed as % of mean removal of killed brood in native, Apis mellifera jemenitica, and exotic, A.m. carnica, honeybees in central Saudi Arabia

Races###General mean of 3 experiments (%)###

###24 h###48 h###72 h

A. m. jemenitica###85.28 b###97.60 a###99.78 a

A. m. carnica###43.84 c###79.32 b###93.29 b

% variance###+94.55###+23.61###+14.00

Means with different letters in same column are significantly different at 5% probability

Table II: Grooming behavior expressed as % mean of deformed Varroa female mites in native, Apis mellifera jemenitica, and exotic, A.m. carnica, honeybees in central Saudi Arabia

Experiments

Races###1st###2nd###3rd###General mean

A. m. jemenitica###31.42 a###46.21 a###15.76 b###31.13 A

A. m. carnica###9.83 b###16.28 b###7.71 b###11.27 B

Table III: Mean % of leg-deformed Varroa female mites in native, Apis mellifera jemenitica, and exotic, A.m. carnica, honeybees in central Saudi Arabia

Experiments###

Races###1st###2nd###3rd###General mean###

A. m. jemenitica###73.21###46.07###49.58###56.29 n.s.

A. m. carnica###56.51###63.55###68.75###62.94 n.s.

Table IV: Mean % of dorsal shield-deformed Varroa female mites in native, Apis mellifera jemenitica and exotic, A.m. carnica, honeybees in central Saudi Arabia

Races###1###2###3###General mean###

A. m. jemenitica###26.80###34.43###50.45###37.18 n.s.

A. m. carnica###41.23###36.48###31.25###36.32 n.s.

environmental conditions. Further selective breeding programs can enhance the levels of hygienic and grooming behaviors in such colonies and provide significant resistance to diseases and parasites.

Acknowledgement: The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding the work through the research group project No. RGP-VPP-189.

REFERENCES

Abdel-Wahab, T.E., 2001. Physiological and morphological studies on the natural defense behavior in honey bee colonies against Varroa mites. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt

Abou El-Enain, H.T., 2006. Studies on some behavior characters of honey bee races. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 31: 7953-7961

Al-Ghamdi, A.A., 1990. Survey of honeybee diseases, pests and predators in Saudi Arabia. M. Phil. Thesis, University of Wales, UK

Al-Ghamdi, A.A., 2002. Evaluation of the hygienic behavior in two honeybee races; Apis mellifera yemenitica, and Apis mellifera carnica and their hybrid against Varroa jacobsoni. Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor, 40: 635-639

Al-Ghzawi, A.A., S.T. Zaitoun and H.K. Shannag, 2001. Ontogenesis of the parasitic mite Varroa jacobsoni on Syrian bee, Apis mellifera syriaca. Zool. Middle East, 23: 101-106

Ali, M.A.M., 2011. Comparative study for evaluating two honey bee races, Apis mellifera jemenitica (indigenous race) and Apis mellifera carnica (Carniolan race) in brood production, population development and foraging activity under the environmental conditions of the central region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Ann. Agric. Sci. Fac. Agric. Ain Shams Univ. Egypt, 56: 127-134

Al-Medani, M.H.E., 2004. Biological study of Varroa mite of honey bee in Yemen. M.Sc. Thesis. San'aa University, Yemen

Al-Otaibi, S.A., 2008. Genetic variability in mite-resistant honey bee using ISSR molecular markers. Arab J. Biotechnol., 11: 241-252

Alqarni, A.S., 1995. Morphometrical and biological studies of the native honeybee race, Apis mellifera L.; the Carnioan A.m. carnica Pollmann and their F1 hybrid. M.Sc. Thesis. College of Agricultural Science. King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Alqarni, A.S., 2006. Tolerance of summer temperature in imported and indigenous honeybee, Apis mellifera L., races in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 13: 123-127

Amro, A.M., 2009. Seasonal variation in some characters of two races of honeybee and their hybrid in Assiut region. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Egypt

Arathi, H.S., I. Burns and M. Spivak, 2000. Ethology of hygienic behavior in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae): behavioural report of hygienic bees. Ethology, 106: 1-15

Arathi, H.S. and M. Spivak, 2001. Influence of colony genotypic composition on the performance of hygienic behaviour in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Anim. Behav., 62: 57-66

Boecking, O. and W. Drescher, 1992. The removal response of Apis mellifera L., colonies to brood in wax and plastic cells after experimental and natural infestation with Varroa jacobsoni Oud. and to freeze-killed brood. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 16: 321-329

Boecking, O. and M. Spivak, 1999. Behavioral defenses of honey bees against Varroa jacobsoni Oud. Apidologie, 30: 141-158

Buchler, R., S. Berg and Y. Le Conte, 2010. Breeding for resistance to Varroa destructor in Europe. Apidologie, 41: 393-408

Fries, I., S. Camazine and J. Sneyd, 1994. Population dynamics of Varroa jacobsoni: a model and a review. Bee World, 75: 5-28

Goode, K., Z. Huber, K.A. Mesce and M. Spivak, 2006. Hygienic behavior of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) is independent of sucrose responsiveness and foraging ontogeny. Hormones Behav., 49: 391-397

Harbo, J.R. and J.W. Harris, 1999. Selecting honey bees for resistance to Varroa jacobsoni. Apidologie, 30: 183-196

Harbo, J.B. and J.W. Harris, 2005. The number of genes involved in the SMR trait. American Bee J., 145: 430-431

Hussein, M.H., M.F. Abdel-Rahman, M.O.M. Omar and S.M. Abo-Lila, 2005. Biometrical studies on some races and hybrids of honeybee in Assiut region, Upper Egypt. 39th Inter. Cong. of Apimondia, Dublin, Ireland

Imdorf, A., S. Bogdanov, V. Kilchenmann and C. Maquelin, 1995. Apilife VAR: a new varroacide with thymol as the main ingredient. BeeWorld, 76: 77-83

Kamel, S.M., J.P. Strange and W.S. Sheppard, 2003. A scientific note on hygienic behavior in Apis mellifera lamarckii and A.m. carnica in Egypt. Apidologie, 34: 189-190

Khanbash, M.S., 2001. Population dynamics of Varroa jacobsoni mite on honeybee colonies in Yemen. Univ. Aden J. Nat. Appl. Sci., 5: 111-118

Lapidge, K.L., B.P. Oldroyd and M. Spivak, 2002. Seven suggestive quantitative trait loci influence hygienic behavior of honey bees.Naturwissenschaften, 89: 565-568

Lodesani, M., A. Pellacani, S. Bergomi, E. Carpana, T. Rabitti and P.Lasagni, 1992. Residue determination from some products used against Varroa infestation in bees. Apidologie, 23: 257-272

Lodesani, M., M.A. Vecchi, S. Tommasini and M. Bigliardi, 1996. A study on different kinds of damage to Varroa jacobsoni in Apis mellifera ligustica colonies. J. Apic. Res., 35: 49-56

Mortiz, R.F.A., 1988. A reevaluation of the two-locus model for hygienic behavior in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J. Hered., 79: 257-262

Nagafgholian, J., A. Pakdel, G. Thahmasbi and G. Nehzati, 2011. Assessing hygienic behavior and attraction to Varroa mite (Acari: Varroidae) in Iranian honey bee (Apis mellifera meda). African J. Biotechnol., 10:1011-1021

Neumann, P. and S. Hartels, 2004. Removal of small hive beetle (Aethina tumida) eggs and larvae by African honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera scutellata). Apidologie, 35: 31-36

Omar, M.O.M., Y.A.I. Abdel-Aal, F.M. Khalil and M.M. Khodairy, 2001. Effect of naturally occring substances on Varroa mites. The 1st Conf. on Safe Alternatives of Pesticides for Pest Management, pp: 355-369. Oct. 28-29, Assiut University, Egypt

Omran, N.S.M., 2004. Defense behavior of the Egyptian honey bee (Apis mellifera lamarckii) against Varroa destructor under South Valley conditions-Egypt. Assiut J. Agric. Sci., 35: 109-119

Owayss, A.A., 2002. Ecological and control studies on certain diseases of honeybee with special reference to integrated management of Varroa mite. Ph.D. Thesis, p: 195. Plant Protec. Department, Fayoum Faculty Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt

Peng, Y., Y. Fang, S. Zu, L. Ge and M. Naser, 1987. Response of foster Asian honey bee (Apis cerana Fabr.) colonies to the brood of European honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) infested with the parasitic mite Varroa jacobsoni Oudmans. J. Invertebr. Pathol., 49: 259-264

Rosenkranz, P., P. Aumeier and B. Ziegelmann, 2010. Biology and control of Varroa destructor. J. Invertebr. Pathol., 103: 96-119

Rothenbuhler, W., 1964. Behavior genetics of nest cleaning in honey bees. I. Response of four inbred lines to disease-killed brood. Anim. Behav., 12: 578-583

Sammataro, D., 1996. Mechanisms of bee resistance/tolerance to Varroa mites. American Bee J., 136: 567-568

Sammataro, D., G. Degrandi-Hoffman, G. Needham and G. Wardell, 1998. Some volatile plant oils as potential control agents for Varroa mites (Acari: Varroaidae) in honey bee colonies (Hymenoptera: Apidae).American Bee J., 138: 681-685

SAS, 2008. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03. SAS Institute, Cary. NC Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran, 1981. Statistical Methods, 7th edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA

Spivak, M., 1996. Honey bee hygienic behavior and defense against Varroa jacobsoni. Apidologie, 27: 245-260 Spivak, M. and M. Gilliam, 1998a. Hygienic behaviour of honey bees and its application for control of brood diseases and Varroa: Part I. Bee World, 79: 124-134

Spivak, M. and M. Gilliam, 1998b. Hygienic behaviour of honey bees and its application for control of brood diseases and Varroa: Part II. BeeWorld, 79: 169-186

Spivak, M. and G.S. Reuter, 2001. Varroa jacobsoni infestation in untreated honey bee (Hymenoptera:Apidae) colonies selected for hygienic behavior. J. Econ. Entomol., 94: 326-331

Villegas, A. and J.D. Villa, 2006. Uncapping of pupal cells by European bees in the United States as responses to Varroa destructor and Galleria mellonella. J. Apic. Res., 45: 203-206

Wallner, K., 1999. Varroacides and their residues in bee products.Apidologie, 30: 235-248

Zaitoun, S.T. and A.A. Al-Ghzawi, 2009. Monthly changes in the natural grooming response in workers of three honey bee subspecies against the bee parasitic mite, Varroa destructor. Jordan J. Agric. Sci., 5:207-217
COPYRIGHT 2012 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Balhareth, Hassan M.; Alqarni, Abdulaziz S.; Owayss, Ayman A.
Publication:International Journal of Agriculture and Biology
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:7SAUD
Date:Dec 31, 2012
Words:3641
Previous Article:Molecular Identification of Lyophyllum connatum and Paneolus sphinctrinus (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) from Himalyan Moist Temperate Forests of...
Next Article:Options for Integrated Strategies for the Control of Avian Coccidiosis.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters