Printer Friendly

Comparative toxicity of six insecticides on the rhinoceros beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).

The rhinoceros beetle, Strategus aloeus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Searabaeidae) is a pest in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacquin; Areeales: Areeaeeae) plantations in the Americas. Strategus aloeus feeds on members of Areeaeeae family such as Bactris gasipaes Kunth, Cocos nucifera (L.), Copernicia cerifera (Mart.), Elaeis oleifera (Kunth) and Phoenix dactylifera (L.) (Ratcliffe 1976; Genty et al. 1978; Chinchilla 2003). Strategus aloeus has a geographical distribution from the southern USA through Central America up to South America (Ratcliffe 1976; Genty et al. 1978). This beetle is nocturnal, and feeds and mates between 18:30 and 05:30 h and 02:00 and 05:00 h, respectively (Pallares et al. 2000).

Adult S. aloeus colonize oil palm plantations in the replanting areas of 25-year-old oil palm stands. During replanting old palm trees are felled and replaced by young palms (Boye & Aubry 1973; Corley & Tinker 2003). The eggs of S. aloeus are laid in dead tissues of the palms; the larvae live in dead trunks or in the soil, and feed on decaying organic matter (Genty et al. 1978; Ahumada et al. 1995). The adults attack 1-3 yr old palms by tunneling into the soil near the palm, and then boring their way into the plant just above the roots. Often, the growing point is reached and plant death occurs (Mariau 1994; Corley & Tinker 2003).

Various control methods such as application of entomopathogenic fungi and capture of adults by pheromone-baited traps have not been effective in protecting replanted crops where high populations of S. aloeus exist (Genty et al. 1978; Ahumada et al. 1995 Pallares et al. 2000). Other control proeedures, such as collection of the immature stages on dead oil palms has a prohibitively high cost in commercial plantations (Bedford 1980; Corley & Tinker 2003). Insecticides such as carbamate and organophosphate compounds are the main method of control for S. aloeus (Genty et al. 1978; Ahumada et al. 1995). Carbamates and organophosphates act through contact and ingestion and cause neurotoxicity, which may be lethal (Bloomquist 1996; He 2000; Gilbert & Gill 2010). To protect oil palm crops, insecticides are applied inside the galleries of S. aloeus in the soil. Application of insecticides to the soil is an efficient method in managing the pest's populations by reducing palm tree damage and lessening the risk to human health and the environment (Darus & Basri 2000; Hartley 2002; Martinez 2013). Oil palm pests, such as Oryctes rhinoceros (L.) and Scapanes australis (Boisduval) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), have been controlled successfully with insecticides applied in the soil galleries (Bedford 1976; Norman & Mohd Basri 1997; Corley & Tinker 2003).

Insecticides can be effective in protecting oil palm plantations, because they rapidly decimate dense insect pest populations (Mariau 1993; Nordin et al. 2004). New insecticidal compounds that are achieving registration within the current regulatory environment of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) include chemical compounds that have reduced-risk and less immediate toxicity to the pest insects than the conventional insecticides (EPA 2011). These types of insecticides are potential new tools for use against the oil palm pest in the commercial plantations because of their suitability for inclusion in IPM programs.

This study compared the toxicity of 6 insecticides on S. aloeus adults under laboratory and field-controlled conditions, in order to contribute new control measures to IPM programs against S. aloeus in oil palm plantations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Insects

In the field, 2,683 pupae of S. aloeus ([male] = 1314, [female] = 1369) were hand collected from dead palm stems in 2 yr-old commercial plantations of the oil palm in the municipality of Puerto Wilches, Santander, Colombia (N 07[degrees] 20' -W 73[degrees] 54'), with average conditions of 28.46 [degrees]C, 75-92% RH, 1,450-2,250 h sunshine/year and 2,168 mm annual rainfall. The insects were placed in metallic boxes (70 x 70 x 80 cm) covered with a nylon mesh and transferred to the Entomology Laboratory of the Brisas Oil Palm Plantation, Puerto Wilches, Santander, Colombia. Pupae of S. aloeus were isolated in plastic containers (15 x 10 cm) containing soil and a moistened cotton ball. The insects were maintained at 28 [+ or -] 1 [degrees]C, 75 [+ or -] 5% RH and 12:12 h L:D photoperiod until adult emergence.

Adults were placed in glass containers (30 x 30 x 30 cm) covered with a nylon mesh with a 15 cm deep soil layer maintained at 80% RH by periodic watering rather by a sprinkler. The beetles were fed on semi-solid diet daily (10 g of stem palm meristem + 10 g of sugarcane + 10 g of banana + water in a 5:5:2:1 ratio) (Pallares et al. 2000). The diet ingredients were cut, chopped and mixed in a laboratory blender (Waring LBC15; 3,500-20,000 rpm). The semi-solid diet was sterilized with ultraviolet light for 30 min and stored at -5 [degrees]C. Photophase and scotophase periods were simulated with white and red lights (IRO 110V 60W; Toshiba Lighting and Technology Corp., Tokyo, Japan), respectively. Healthy S. aloeus adults without amputations or malformations were used in the bioassays.

Insecticides

Six different neurotoxic insecticides were used in this study. The following commercial insecticides were tested at their maximum label rates: fipronil (Clap[R] SC, Bayer, Germany), 200 g [L.sup.-1]; imidaeloprid (Confidor[R] SL, Cyanamid, Belgium), 200 g [L.sup.-1]; lambda-cyhalothrin (Karate[R] EC, Zeneca, Wilmington, USA), 25 g [L.sup.-1]; spinosad (Tracer[R] SC, Dow Agrosciences, USA), 120 g [L.sup.-1]; Thiacloprid (Calypso[R] SC, Cyanamid, Belgium), 480 g [L.sup.-1]; and thiamethoxam (Actara[R] SC, Syngenta, Canada), 240 g [L.sup.-1]. These insecticides were diluted in 1 L water to produce a stock solution by adjusting 100 g [L.sup.-1] per insecticide and to obtain the required concentrations.

Insecticide Bioassay

Insecticide efficacy was determined by calculating the lethal concentrations ([LC.sub.50] and[LC.sub.90]) and lethal time ([LT.sub.50] and [LT.sub.99]) values under laboratory conditions for each formulation. Six concentrations of each insecticide besides the control (distilled water), were adjusted in 1 mL stock solution (insecticide and distilled water): 3.12, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 [micro]L and 100 [micro]L. For each insecticide, aliquots were taken from the stock solution and mixed with distilled water in 5 mL glass vials. Different concentrations of the insecticides were applied in 1 pL solution onto 5 g of semi-solid diet and used to feed each insect. Fifty insects were used per concentration and were placed individually in plastic containers (15 x 10 cm) with a perforated lid and maintained in the dark. The number of dead insects in each cage was counted after insecticide exposure at intervals of 2 h over 6 days.

Assays for Mortality under Field Conditions

One hundred, 6-month-old oil palms ('Tenera' cv, 'Deli' x 'Ghana') and 100 adults of S. aloeus were used for each insecticide in the controlled field test. These palms were planted into soil in polyethylene bags and maintained in the greenhouse at a temperature of 27 [+ or -] 2 [degrees]C, 75-80% RH and 25% shadow. One insect was caged in each oil palm a nylon trap (0.5 x 0.5 x 1.20 m). Treatments consisted of adding each insecticide at the calculated [LC.sub.90] concentration and distilled water as the control with 4 replications per treatment. The [LC.sub.90] concentration of each insecticide was applied directly on the galleries while distilled water was applied to the controls. Applications of 500 mL per gallery were made by a manual pump (Royal Condor, 10 L capacity). The application was evaluated after 5 days, when the insects build their galleries. Mortality of S. aloeus caused by insecticides was recorded every day during 15 days, and was corrected both in the laboratory and field bioassays according to Abbott (1925)

Statistics

The [LC.sub.50-9-] [LT.sub.50-99] and their confidence limits were determined by logistic regression based on the concentration probit-mortality (Finney 1964), with the program XLSTAT-PRO v.7.5 for Windows (XLSTAT 2004). Mortality data from the controlled field test were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Mortality variables were summarized in percentages and the data were transformed by arcsine square root. Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference test (HSD) was used for comparison of the means at the 5% significance level (PROC ANOVA) (SAS 2002).

RESULTS

Insecticide Susceptibility of Strategus aloeus

The highest mortalities were obtained with 50 and 100 [micro]L [mL.sup.-1] of the above mentioned insecticides. The 3 different lethal concentrations levels ([LC.sub.50] [LC.sub.90] and [LC.sub.99]) (Table 1) of each insecticide was estimated by Probit ([chi square]; P < 0.001). The [LC.sub.50-90] values indicated that fipronil ([chi square] = 37.81; df = 5), lambda-cyhalothrin ([chi square] = 42.52; df = 5) and thiamethoxam ([chi square] = 48.43; df = 5) were the most toxic compounds to the S. aloeus adults followed by thiacloprid ([chi square] = 27.84; df = 5). ([LC.sub.50-90]) value was lower with imidacloprid ([chi square] = 13.07; df = 5) and spinosad ([chi square] = 12.02; df = 5). Mortality was always < 1% in the control.

[LT.sub.50] values were recorded when the pest was exposed from 21 to 144 h (1-6 days) to the various insecticides each applied at 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 [micro]L [mL.sup.-1] (Fig. 1). The elapsed times for [LC.sub.50] values were recorded from 24 h to 144 h for the insecticide concentrations of 6.25 and 100 [micro]L [mL.sup.-1] The [LT.sub.50] values recorded at the higher and lower concentrations were between 21.81 and 111.9 h for fipronil, 25.53 and 85.71 h for imidacloprid, 48.97 and 120.1 h for lambda-cyhalothrin, 72.01 and 144.1 h for thiamethoxam, 77.41 and 105.8 h for spinosad, and to 100.1 and 120.1 h for thiacloprid. The elapsed times for the [LC.sub.99] values were recorded from 120 to 144 h for the insecticide concentrations of to 50 and 100 [micro]L [mL.sup.-1]. The [LT.sub.99] values recorded at the higher and lower concentrations were 97.96 h to fipronil, 125.1 h to imidacloprid, 118.8 h to lambda-cyhalothrin and 142 h to thiamethoxam. It was not possible to estimate [LT.sub.99] values for spinosad and thiacloprid at any of the exposure periods used.

Mortality in Controlled Field Tests

The mortality effects caused by the tested insecticides on the S. aloeus adults were statistically different in controlled field conditions using the previously estimated concentrations for the [LC.sub.90] values ([F.sub.1, 23] = 7.85; P < 0.05). Fipronil, lambdacyhalothrin and thiamethoxam caused mortalities of 84.1 [+ or -] 9.5%, 88.3 [+ or -] 3.7% and 89.9 [+ or -] 12.4%, respectively, followed by mortalities by thiacloprid, imidacloprid and spinosad of 78.9 [+ or -] 8.9%, 73.9 [+ or -] 7.9% and 67.3 [+ or -] 7.3%, respectively Mortality never exceeded 3.14 [+ or -] 0.3% in the control (Fig. 2).

DISCUSSION

The toxicity profiles for the 6 insecticides against the rhinoceros beetle, S. aloeus were determined from the bioassays in the laboratory and controlled field conditions. The insecticides fipronil, imidacloprid, lambda-cyhalothrin, spinosad, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam caused substantial mortality of the S. aloeus adults under laboratory conditions. The best results were obtained with concentrations of 50 and 100 [micro]L [mL.sup.-1]. The susceptibility of the Scarabaeids may vary with exposure in the different concentrations of insecticides (Villani et al. 1988; Cowles & Villani 1996; Gilbert & Gill 2010). Different studies show that Macrodactylus subspinosus (Fabricius), Oryctes rhinoceros (L.), and Popillia japonica (Newman) were susceptible to the insecticide concentration ranges applied in the food (Isaacs et al. 2004; Baumler & Potter 2007; Sreeletha & Geetha 2012).

The insects exposed to the neurotoxic insecticides: fipronil, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam displayed altered locomotion activity, and muscle contractions that were observed at high concentrations in [LC.sub.50-90] test. In contrast, the adults of S. aloeus gradually lost mobility when they were exposed to the lambda-cyhalothrin. In some individuals, the paralysis was constant with concentrations near the [LC.sub.50] without recovery signs. The mode of action of the fipronil involves blocking the [gamma]-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-gated chloride channel which is also the target for cyclodiene insecticides such as endosulfan and dieldrin (Cole et al. 1993; Hainzl & Casida 1996; Durham et al. 2002). Lambda-cyhalothrin and other pyrethroids are known to cause rapid paralysis in invertebrates by disrupting nerve conduction; their primary site of action are the voltage-gated sodium channels (Bloomquist & Miller 1986; Baumler & Potter 2007). Imidacloprid, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam appear to interfere with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors located in the post-synaptic membrane, disrupting normal nerve function (Grewal et al. 2001; Matsuda 2001; Tan et al. 2008). Spinosad is a neurotoxin that targets the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and the GABA receptors, and causes cessation of feeding followed later by paralysis and death (Salgado 1998; Crouse et al. 2001). In this study, the [LC.sub.50-90] values indicated that lethality of imidacloprid and spinosad were lower on S. aloeus using the evaluated concentrations. However, the lethalities of fipronil, lambda-cyhalothrin, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam on S. aloeus may have advantages by their mode of action on this insect and could be applied in rotation, under field conditions.

The insecticides evaluated required extended periods of time to achieve the mortality of S. aloeus. The [LT.sub.50] varied from 21 to 144 h, whereas the LT90 ranged from 120 and 144 h. The lethal effect of fipronil was observed quickly (in 21 h), followed by imidacloprid (25 h), lambda-cyhalothrin (48 h), thiamethoxam (72 h), while spinosad and thiacloprid showed lethal effects at 76 h and 100 h, respectively. In this study, the comparative effects on S. aloeus between the 6 insecticides were observed at various time points. Immediate lethal effect of insecticides are not essential to protect crops, unless the target insects vector viruses or other dangerous pathogens. Some insecticides cause cessation of feeding long before the target insects dies. However, a quick-acting insecticide is generally considered essential for impregnation of the palm stems; in this case, the beetles were able to feed, even if they died later. Neurotoxic insecticides can reduce injuries of commercial crops caused by the nocturnal beetles (Drink-water 2003; Isaacs et al. 2004).

In the controlled field tests, the lethal effects of the insecticides on S. aloeus were consistent with those observed under laboratory conditions. Fipronil, lambda-cyhalothrin, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam showed strong lethal effects on S. aloeus, whereas imidacloprid and spinosad were less toxic. However, when the insecticides were applied to the insect in the field, the mortality levels were lower than those obtained under laboratory conditions. One possible reason for the efficacy of the insecticides under the field conditions could be contact exposure on the body. In this bioassay, it is difficult to accurately know the amount of the insecticide absorbed by the insect, but the lethal effects caused by these insecticides on S. aloeus showed continuity of that trend with the application of the [LC.sub.90] concentration. The lethal effects of the insecticides and their effectiveness have also been studied in other pests under field conditions with fipronil being a potent control agent of Diloboderus abderus Sturm larvae, lambda-cyhalothrin and thiacloprid being a potent in controlling P. japonica larvae and adults, and thiamethoxam being a potent against Heteronychus arator Fabricius (Silva & Boss 2002; Drinkwater 2003; Baumler & Potter 2007).

This study showed the potential of 6 insecticides to control the S. aloeus adults in oil palm plantations. The toxicity of these insecticides with different modes of action may enable the control of the S. aloeus populations and may reduce injuries caused by this insect on E. guineensis. Fipronil, lambda-cyhalothrin, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam have lethal effects on S. aloeus with the potential to manage its field populations. In order to prevent or retard the development of insecticide resistance, insecticides with different modes of action should be used in rotation as indicated by Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC 2014). The IRAC mode of action groups to which the above insecticides belong are as follows: fipronil (2B, GABA-gated chloride channel antagonists), lambda-cyhalothrin (3A, Sodium channel modulators), imidacloprid, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam (4A, Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor [nAChR] agonists), and spinosad (5, Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor [nAChR] allosteric activators). Thus these insecticides belong to four IRAC mode of action groups, and their field applications should be rotated accordingly.

Caption: Fig. 1. Comparison of lethal times ([LT.sub.50-99]) of various insecticides at the indicated concentration applied against Strategus aloeus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) adults. The insecticides were fipronil (A), imidacloprid (B), lambdacyhalothrin (C), spinosad (D), thiacloprid (E), and thiamethoxam (F). Mortality data collected during 6 days were used to calculate the [LC.sub.50-90] values (P < 0.0001).

Caption: Fig. 2. Mortality in controlled field conditions of Strategus aloeus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) adults by insecticides to level [LC.sub.90] application. Treatments means (percent mortality [+ or -] SEM) differ significantly at P < 0.05 (Tukey's mean separation test).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Angel Contreras for technique support. To Oleagionas Las Brisas (Colombia), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico CNPq (Brasil), Coordenagao de Aperfeigoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior CAPES (Brasil), and Fundagao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais FAPEMIG (Brasil).

REFERENCES CITED

ABBOTT, W. S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18: 265-266.

AHUMADA, M. L., CALVACHE, H., CRUZ, M. A., AND LUQUE, J. E. 1995. Strategus aloeus (L.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): biologia y comportamiento en Puerto Wilches (Santander). Palmas 16: 9-16.

BAUMLER, R. E., AND POTTER, D. A. 2007. Knockdown, residual, and antifeedant activity of pyrethroids and home landscape bioinsecticides against Japanese beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on linden foliage. J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 451-458.

BEDFORD, G. O. 1976. Observations on the biology and ecology of Oryctes rhinoceros and Scapanes australis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae): Pests of coconut palms in Melanesia. Australian J. Entomol. 15: 241-251.

BEDFORD, G. O. 1980. Biology, ecology and control of palm rhinoceros beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25: 309-339.

BLOOMQUIST, J. R. 1996. Ion channels as targets for insecticides. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 163-190.

BLOOMQUIST, J. R., AND MILLER, T. A. 1986. Sodium channel neurotoxins as probes of the knockdown resistance mechanism. Neurotoxicology 7: 217-224.

BOYE, P., AND AUBRY, M. 1973. Replantation des palmeraies industrielles. Methode de preparation de terrain et de protection contre l'Oryctes en Afrique de l'Ouest. Oleagineux 28: 175-176.

CHINCHILLA, C. M. 2003. Manejo integrado de problemas fitosanitarios en palma aceitera Elaeis guineensis en America Central. Manejo Integrado de Plagas y Agroecologia 67: 69-82.

COLE, L. M., NICHOLSON, R. A., AND CASIDA, J. E. 1993. Action of phenylpyrazole insecticides at the GABAgated chloride channel. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 46: 47-54.

CORLEY, R. H. V., AND TINKER, P. B. 2003. The oil palm, 4th. Blackwell Science Ltd, USA.

COWLES, R. S., AND VILLANI, M. G. 1996. Susceptibility of Japanese beetle, oriental beetle, and European chafer (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to halofenozide, and insect growth. J. Econ. Entomol. 89: 1556-1565.

CROUSE, G. D., SPARKS, T. C., SCHOONOVER, J., GIFFORD, J., DRIPPS, J., BRUCE, T., LARSON, L. L., GARLICH, J., HATTON, C., HILL, R. L., WORDEN, T. V., AND MARTYNOW, J. G. 2001. Recent advances in the chemistry of spinosyns. Pest Mgt. Sci. 57: 177-185.

DARUS, A., AND BASRI, M. W. 2000. Intensive IPM for management of oil palm pests. Oil Palm Bull. 41: 1-14.

DRINKWATER, T. W. 2003. Bioassays to compare the systemic activity of three neonicotinoids for control of Heteronychus arator Fabricius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in maize. Crop Prot. 22: 989-993.

DURHAM, E. W., SIEGFRIED, B. D., AND SCHARF, M. E. 2002. In vivo and in vitro metabolism of fipronil by larvae of the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis. Pest Mgt. Sci. 58: 799-804.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 2011. EPA's Pesticides industry sales and usage, 2006 and 2007 Market estimates. <http://www.epa.gov/oppbead1/pestsales/. Accessed I-2012>.

FINNEY, D. J. 1964. Probit analysis: a statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. Cambridge University Press, London.

GENTY, P., DESMIER DE CHENON, D., AND MORIN, J. 1978. Ravageurs du palmier a huile en Amerique Latine. Oleagineux 33: 325-419.

GILBERT, L. I., AND GILL, S. S. 2010. Insect control biological and synthetic agents. Academic Press-Elsevier B.V. London, UK.

GREWAL, P. S., POWER, K. T., AND SHETLAR, D. J. 2001. Neonicotinoid insecticides alter diapause behavior and survival of overwintering white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Pest Mgt. Sci. 57: 852-857.

HAINZL, D., AND CASIDA, J. E. 1996. Fipronil insecticide: Novel photochemical desulfinylation with retention of neurotoxicity (insecticide action and environmental persistence). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 1276412767.

HARTLEY, M. J. 2002. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. Forest Ecol. Mgt. 155: 81-95.

He, F. 2000. Neurotoxic effects of insecticides-current and future research: a review. Neurotoxicology 21: 829-35.

IRAC. 2014. IRAC MoA Classification Scheme, Version 7.3. http://www.irac-online.org/teams/mode-of-action/ .Accessed V-24-2014.

ISAACS, R., MERCADER, R. J., AND WISE, J. C. 2004. Activity of conventional and reduced-risk insecticides for protection of grapevines against the rose chafer, Macrodactylus subspinosus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 128: 371-376.

MARIAU, D. 1993. Insecticides recommended against oil palm and coconut pests. Oleagineux 48: 530-532.

MARIAU, D. 1994. Phytosanitary monitoring of oil palm and coconut plantations. Oleagineux 49: 250-254. Martinez, O. L., Plata-Rueda, a., and Martinez, L. C. 2013. Oil palm plantations as an agroecosystem: impact on integrated pest management and pesticide use. Outlooks Pest Mgt. 24: 225-229.

MATSUDA, K., BUCKINGHAM, S. D., KLEIER, D., RAUH, J. J., GRAUSO, M., AND SATTELLE, D. B. 2001. Neonicotinoids: insecticides acting on insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 22: 573-580.

NORMAN, H. K., AND MOHD BASRI, W. 1997. Status of rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) as a pest of young oil palm in Malaysia. The Planter 73: 5-21.

NORDIN, A. B. A., SIMEH, M. A., AMIRUDDIN, M. N., WENG, C. K., AND SALAM, B. A. 2004. Economic feasibility of organic palm oil production in Malaysia. Oil Palm Ind. Econ. J. 4: 29-38.

PALLARES, C. H., ALDANA, J. A., CALVACHE, H., RAMIREZ, P., ROCHAT, D., LUQUE, E., AND CORREA, N. 2000. Analisis del comportamiento y comunicacion quimica intraespecifica en Strategus aloeus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae - Dynastinae). Palmas 21: 185-194.

RATCLIFFE, B. C. 1976. A revision of the genus Strategus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Univ. Nebraska Museum. Papers in Entomol. 144: 1-115. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/144

SALGADO, V. L. 1998. Studies on the mode of action of spinosad: insect symptoms and physiological correlates. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 60: 91-102.

SILVA, M. T. B., AND BOSS, A. 2002. Controle de larvas de Diloboderus abderus com inseticidas em trigo. Cienc. Rural 32: 191-195.

SREELETHA, C., AND GEETHA, P. R. 2012. Pesticidal effects of Annona squamosa L. on male Oryctes rhinoceros Linn. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in relation to reproduction. Curr. Biotic. 6: 8-21.

SAS INSTITUTE. 2002. The SAS System for Windows, release 9.0. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

TAN, J., SALGADO, V.L., AND HOLLINGWORTH, R. M. 2008. Neural actions of imidacloprid and their involvement in resistance in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Pest Mgt. Sci. 64: 37-47.

VILLANI, M. G., WRIGHT, R. J., AND BAKER, P. B. 1988. Differential susceptibility of Japanese beetle, oriental beetle, and European chafer

(Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) larvae to five soil insecticides. J. Econ. Entomol. 81: 785-788.

XLSTAT 2004. XLSTAT for Excel. Addinsoft, UK.

LUIS C. MARTINEZ (1), ANGELICA PLATA-RUEDA (2), JOSE C. ZANUNCIO (1) AND JOSE E. SERRAO (3) *

(1) Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Vinosa, 36570-000, Vinosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil

(2) Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Vinosa, 36570-000, Vinosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil

(3) Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Vinosa, 36570-000, Vinosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil

* Corresponding author; E-mail: jeserrao@ufv.br

TABLE 1. LETHAL CONCENTRATIONS OF SIX INSECTICIDES ON STRATEGUS
ALOEUS (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE) ADULTS. DOSES OF INSECTICIDE WERE
APPLIED TO THE SEMI-SOLID DIET. THE NUMBER OF DEAD INSECTS IN
EACH CAGE WAS COUNTED AFTER EXPOSURE TO THE TREATED DIET AT
INTERVALS OF 2 H OVER 6 DAYS.

Insecticide          (a) LC      (b) EV        (c) CI
                               ([micro]L      [micro]L
                              [mL.sup.-1])   [mL.sup.-1]

Thiamethoxam           50        1.092        0.98-1.21
                       90        2.403        2.16-2.72
                       99        2.947        2.64-3.35
Lambda-cyhalothrin     50        0.718        0.63-0.81
                       90        1.841        1.64-2.11
                       99        2.306        2.04-2.66
Fipronil               50        0.454        0.38-0.52
                       90        1.409        1.25-1.62
                       99        1.805        1.59-2.09
Thiacloprid            50        2.335        2.08-2.61
                       90        5.754        5.15-6.54
                       99        7.167        6.39-8.19
Imidacloprid           50        0.594        0.39-0.77
                       90        3.392        2.96-3.98
                       99        4.552        3.96-5.38
Spinosad               50        1.099        0.97-1.23
                       90        2.701        2.42-3.06
                       99        3.365        3.01-3.83

Insecticide          (a) LC   (d) [chi square]

Thiamethoxam           50          48.43
                       90
                       99
Lambda-cyhalothrin     50          42.52
                       90
                       99
Fipronil               50          37.81
                       90
                       99
Thiacloprid            50          27.84
                       90
                       99
Imidacloprid           50          13.07
                       90
                       99
Spinosad               50          12.02
                       90
                       99

(a) [LC.sub.50, 90 and 99] concentrations causing 50, 90 and 99%
mortality; (b) EV, estimated value; (c) CI, confidence interval;
(d) [chiu square] chi-square value for lethal concentrations and
fiducial limits based on a log scale with significance level at
P < 0.0001.


----------

Please note: Some tables or figures were omitted from this article.
COPYRIGHT 2014 Florida Entomological Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Martinez, Luis C.; Plata-Rueda, Angelica; Zanuncio, Jose C.; Serrao, Jose E.
Publication:Florida Entomologist
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:3BRAZ
Date:Sep 1, 2014
Words:4217
Previous Article:Studies on the karyotype of the ant Pachycondyla harpax (Formicidae: Ponerinae: Ponerini) in Southern Bahia, Brazil.
Next Article:Five new species and five new records of the genus Meganola (Lepidoptera: Nolidae: Nolinae) from China.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters