Comparative study between radiology and ultrasound in the evaluation of extracardiac thoracic diseases in dogs and cats/Estudo comparativo entre radiologia e ultrassonografia na avaliacao de doencas toracicas extracardiacas em caes e gatos.
Radiographic examinations are essential for the evaluation of thoracic diseases. However, the findings are often nonspecific or can be limited by the presence of pleural fluid or the involvement of multiple thoracic compartments (REICHLE & WISNER, 2000). The usefulness of thoracic ultrasound is maximized when it is performed together with thoracic radiography. The location and type of disease found on radiographs can help with the formation of a potential acoustic window (MATTOON & NYLAND, 2005). The ultrasound plays an increasingly important role in the diagnosis of several pulmonary, pleural and mediastinal conditions by providing information about the location, size, extent and nature of the lesion (REICHLE & WISNER, 2000). The objective of this study was to demonstrate the advantages and limitations of the technique of radiography and B-mode and Doppler ultrasound of the thoracic cavity in canine and feline species. Furthermore, at the end of the study, it was determined whether the additional information influenced the differential diagnosis and the outcome of each case.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A prospective and comparative study between radiographic and B-mode and Doppler ultrasound of the thorax, excluding the heart, was conducted in dogs and cats. Cases of animals suspected of having thoracic disease, identified in 21 consecutive months, were included. Radiographic examination was performed first; if a potential acoustic window was identified, the animals underwent a thoracic ultrasound examination. The animals were excluded from the study if the radiograph did not reveal a potential acoustic window and if the animal's general condition was a contraindication to manipulation. For the radiographic examination, a 200mA, 110kV Omega 200T device was used. The radiographic film and the technique were based on the animal size and the thickness of the region to be radiographed. Three radiographic projections (laterolateral right (RLL), laterolateral left (LLL) and ventrodorsal (VD) were performed, except in dyspneic animals in which only dorsoventral positioning was performed. The radiographic films were developed and fixed manually. The ultrasound examination was performed with a SonoSite 180 Plus device (version 1.99) (SonoSite Inc., Bothell, WA, EUA) with two transducers, an electronic sector transducer (4.0 to 7.0 MHz) and a linear electronic transducer (5.0 to 10 MHz). The animals were prepared for examination with hair removal in the anatomic region under examination, and gel was applied. The appropriate transducer for intercostal, transhepatic or cranial mediastinal examination was selected according to the acoustic window visualized radiographically. Image acquisition was performed in the B-mode in the dorsal and transverse planes and repeated using the Power Doppler technique when applicable. The sonographic examination was evaluated by one observer. After the radiographic and ultrasound examinations, the results of the two methods were compared to assess the impact of the latter method on the diagnosis. The impact of ultrasonography was considered if it helped in the differential diagnosis (cases in which there was reduction in the list of differential diagnoses, additional information or a change of diagnosis); influenced the outcome (cases in which the findings altered the clinical management); or did not affect the diagnosis. The radiographs were subsequently evaluated by two observers (A.C.B.C.F.P. and S.C.F.H.) who were blinded to the clinical history as well as the physical, laboratory and ultrasound findings. The radiographic findings of the three evaluators (two blind and ours) were compared (if there was correlation between the evaluations). Necropsies were performed on animals that were euthanized or that subsequently died.
Twenty-nine cases were studied, including 27 (93%) canines and 2 (7%) felines. Of these, 18 (62%) animals were female and 11 (38%) animals were male.
Of the 29 cases that radiographically demonstrated a potential acoustic window, 27 (93%) animals revealed an effective acoustic window. Of these animals, the acoustic window was due to masses and nodules on the surface of the thorax in 15 cases, pleural effusion in 9 cases, pulmonary consolidation in 4 cases and visualization of mediastinal masses (enlarged sternal lymph nodes) in 2 cases. In two cases, the potential acoustic window was not effective due to a small sternal lymph node and small osteomas.
Based on the opinion of at least one of the blinded observers, 9 of the 29 cases were considered to not have a potential acoustic window. Two cases did not form an effective acoustic window, but in 7 cases, an ultrasound image was obtained.
The advantages and limitations of the technique of radiography and B-mode and Doppler ultrasound of the thoracic cavity are shown in table 1.
At the end of the study, the impact of the ultrasound examination was compared with our evaluation of the radiographic examination and the blind evaluation. The formation of a potential acoustic window was based on the opinion of at least one observer, i.e., in the blind evaluation, 20 cases were considered to have a potential acoustic window (Table 2).
The outcome was influenced by the following additional information: the suggestion of a pulmonary consolidation rather than a nodule; the exclusion of a diaphragmatic rupture; the location and characterization of an abscess or neoplasm with central necrosis; the identification of adenopathy in the cranial mediastinum, suggesting lymphoma; the identification of pleural effusion with the presence of debris, suggesting pyothorax (Figure 1); and the quantification of the pleural effusion resulting in the decision to not perform a thoracentesis. In this study, the ultrasound affected the differential diagnosis in 10 animals. Although important information for the diagnosis was provided, this information did not influence clinical management. Of these 10, in 9 animals, the exact location of the mass or nodules and tissue evaluation provided additional insight. In one animal, a structure immersed in free fluid was identified. In 11 cases, there was no impact on the differential diagnosis or on the outcome. In 6 cases, radiographic findings were confirmed by ultrasound but did not influence the diagnosis. In 2 cases, no effective acoustic window was identified. Therefore, there was good correlation of our radiographic evaluations and the evaluation of the blinded evaluators regarding the impact on the differential diagnosis provided by ultrasound examination for non-cardiac thoracic diseases, 62.06% and 50%, respectively.
In this study, the best transducer for the thoracic evaluation of dogs and cats was the sectorial electronic transducer (4.0 to 7 MHz) because of the reduced skin-contact surface. One of the advantages of the ultrasound examination was its portability. This feature facilitated the examination of patients in the emergency room. The evaluation of animals in sternal recumbency was possible and thus reduced the need for manipulation, corroborating SCHWARZ &TIDWELL (1999). The high incidence of females with nodules or thoracic masses can be explained by the fact that these animals were radiographically evaluated for lung metastases of mammary neoplasms.
The formation of an acoustic window was essential for ultrasound evaluation of the thoracic cavity. Formation of an acoustic window was possible in areas where there was no air between the transducer and the lesion, consistent with the descriptions by MATTOON & NYLAND (2005) and LARSON (2009).
In this study, with only the radiographic examination, lesions of the thoracic structure would be impossible to distinguish in many of the cases. The nodules identified on the chest wall were confirmed by the absence of the sliding sign and by visualizing the ribs distal to the lesions. This sign allowed for easy identification in most of the cases. However, in animals that presented with shallow respiration that limited lung movement, the perception of this sign became more difficult. The sliding sign was reported by TIDWELL (1998). Another advantage of the ultrasound was the possibility of evaluating masses or nodules. According to PAULINELLI et al. (2002), twelve animals presented with ultrasound characteristics of malignancy (irregular borders and hyperechoic spots), but the definitive diagnosis could only be confirmed after histopathological examination. In one animal, the mass presented irregular borders, an anechoic center with hyperechoic spots and a peripheral echogenic halo that was suggested to be an abscess, which was confirmed by necropsy. This description is consistent with the findings in the literature (FAUSTO & CHAMMAS, 2009). Most nodules in the present study were thought to be metastases because of the little or lack of vascularization detected by the Doppler examination described by CHAMMAS et al. (2009). The presence of primary neoplasms in other locations, such as mammary neoplasms, would have suggested that the lung nodules were metastases, but this finding could only be confirmed by histopathological examination. In 4 animals, a Doppler reverberation artifact was observed in the periphery of the nodule. This finding can be mistaken for peripheral vascularization. Furthermore, the nodules in the ultrasound appeared slightly smaller than in the radiographic examination. The larger appearance upon radiographic examination can be explained by lung atelectasis around the nodule or by the inflammatory infiltrate as described by MYER (1980). To determine the exact sizes of these nodules or masses, further investigations with more sensitive imaging methods or necropsy (gold standard) should be conducted. The radiographic examination was better at detecting nodules because some lesions were not visualized by ultrasound, most likely because they were surrounded by aerated lung, which prevented their detection. The superiority of the radiographic examination in relation to the ultrasound was based on the possibility of a panoramic view of the thorax, which led to better descriptions regarding the extent of the lesion.
An acoustic window created by a pleural effusion was easily detected. Even small amounts of free fluid in the pleural space were capable of creating an acoustic window, enabling the assessment of deeper structures, which were usually not typically visualized because the lung was aerated (Figure 2). The advantage of the ultrasound was the possibility of evaluating and characterizing the pleural effusion. The results demonstrated that the anechoic effusions could represent transudative or exudative processes. However, the fluid with echogenic characteristics and the presence of floating particulate matter, septations or fibrin filaments represented an exudate, a phenomenon also noted by YANG et al. (1992). Another important advantage of ultrasound is the capacity to distinguish the amount of fluid present. The ultrasound is considered to be the gold standard for the evaluation of pleural effusions (SPERANDEO et al., 2008). Given the possibility of a small effusion, as observed in one case, ultrasound may be used prior to thoracentesis, as suggested by LARSON (2009). In this case, the radiopacity visualized by radiographic examination represented the overlapping of the free fluid in the pleural space with the more radiopaque lung due to a possible edema, which was confirmed by a positive response to the treatment. A thoracentesis without an initial evaluation with ultrasound could lead to complications.
In cases of mediastinal diseases (2 cases), to form an acoustic window, lesions must be large enough to come into contact with the chest wall, corroborating LARSON (2009). The approach through the cranial mediastinum enabled the visualization of a lymph node in one case and the visualization of a pleural effusion in two cases. The mediastinal origins of the masses were confirmed by the location and independent movement of the lungs, i.e., the lungs slid over the masses. Access through the entrance of the thorax enabled the visualization of the masses in the topographical area of the sternal lymph node with the following features: heterogeneous echogenicity and echotexture, irregular margins, calcifications forming an acoustic shadow. The masses were able to be evaluated by Power Doppler, revealing mottled central vascularization (Figure 3), consistent with a malignant lesion, as previously discussed.
In cases of radiographic findings suggestive of pulmonary consolidation, the ultrasound showed: loss of the reverberation artifact, hypoechoic lung tissue, hyperechoic trabeculations with anechoic content (fluid bronchograms or vessels) and hyperechoic spots with formation of a comet tail (residual air). These ultrasound characteristics corroborated RADEMACHER et al. (2014). The differentiation of fluid bronchograms and small pulmonary vessels was possible by Doppler evaluation. Fluid bronchograms, unlike vessels, are not pulsatile. However, the visualization of vessels or fluid bronchograms indicates pulmonary consolidation because none of these are visualized in normal aerated lung (Figure 4).
The ultrasound findings of three animals were confirmed by necropsy. In other words, the ultrasound examination was valuable for diagnosing these animals. In two animals, the ultrasound image was not capable of providing a precise diagnosis because additional alterations were visualized only after necropsy, thereby demonstrating the limitations of this imaging method. In one animal, the ultrasound image was not capable of precisely identifying the structure, which was only visualized after necropsy.
Radiographic examination should be conducted prior to an ultrasound to identify the location of an acoustic window. When nodules are dispersed throughout the thorax, the radiographic examination is superior to ultrasound. This study shows that ultrasound of the thorax should be adopted in a routine veterinary clinic because the examination provides important clinical information. Additionally, the patient can be evaluated without excessive manipulation.
BIOETHICS AND BIOSSECURITY COMMITTEE APPROVAL
The project was certified by the Ethics Committee and Biosafety of DVT / UFV. Protocol No 82/2007.
To the Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) by the granting master's scholarship to the first author. To the Fundacao Arthur Bernardes (FUNARBE) da Universidade Federal de Vicosa (UFV) for the granting to the second author (leader) (138/09).
CHAMMAS, M. C. et al. Lesoes focais/tumores. In: CHAMMAS, M.C, CERRI, G. G. Ultrassonografia abdominal. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter, 2009. Cap. 3, p.154-215.
FAUSTO, C.S.C.V; CHAMMAS, M.C. Doencas Infecciosas. In: CHAMMAS, M.C; CERRI, G.G. Ultrassonografia abdominal. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter, 2009. p.78-80.
LARSON, M. M. Ultrasound of the Thorax (Noncardiac). Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, v.39, n.4, p.733-745, 2009. Available from: <http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19531398>. Accessed: Apr. 25, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm. 2009.04.006.
MATTOON, J.S.; NYLAND, T.G. Torax. In: NYLAND, T.G; MATTOON, J.S. Ultrassom Diagnostico em Pequenos Animais. 2. ed. Sao Paulo: Rocca, 2005. p. 337-364.
MYER, W. Radiography review: the intersticial pattern of pulmonary disease. Veterinary Radiology, v.21, n.1, p.18-23, 1980. Available from: <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1980.tb01345.x/abstract>. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2013. doi:10.mi/j.1740-8261.1980.tb01345.x.
PAULINELLI, R. R. et al. Estudo Prospectivo das Caracteristicas Sonograficas no Diagnostico de Nodulos Solidos da Mama. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, v.24, n.3, p.195-199, 2002. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbgo/v24n3/ a08v24n3.pdf>. Accessed: Apr. 02, 2013. doi:10.1590/S010072032002000300008.
RADEMACHER, N. et al. Transthoracic lung ultrasound in normal dogs and dogs with cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a pilot study. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, v.55, n.4, p.447-452, 2014. Available from: <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ vru.12151/pdf>. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2015. doi:10.1111/vru.12151.
REICHLE, J.K; WISNER, E.R. Non-cardiac thoracic ultrasound in 75 feline and canine patients. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, v.41(2), p.154-162, 2000. Available from: <http://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2000.tb01470.x/abstract>. Accessed: Feb. 02, 2013. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8261.2000.tb01470.x.
SCHWARZ, L. A.; TIDWELL, A. S. Alternative imaging of the lung. Clinical Techniques in small Animal, v. 14, n.4, p.187-206, 1999. Available from: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/10652836>. Accessed: Apr. 02, 2013. doi:10.1016/ S1096-28679980011-5.
SPERANDEO, M. et al. Role of thoracic ultrasound in the assessment of pleural and pulmonary diseases. Journal of Ultrasound, v. 11, n. 2, p. 39-46, 2008. Available from: <http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23396553>. Accessed: Apr. 22, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jus.2008.02.001.
TIDWELL, A. S. Ultrasonography of the thorax (excluding the heart). Veterinary Clinics of North America: small animal practice, v.28, n.4, p.993-1015, 1998. Available from: <http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9698623>. Accessed: Feb. 02, 2013.
YANG, P.C. et al. Value of Sonography in Determining the Nature of Pleural Effusion: Analysis of 320 Cases. American Journal of Roentgenology, v. 159, n.1, p. 29-33, 1992. Available from: <http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/reprint/159/1/29>. Accessed: Apr. 22, 2013. doi:0361-803x/92/1591-0029.
Samara Turbay Pires (I) Maria Cristina Ferrarini Nunes Soares Hage (II) Ana Carolina Brandao de Campos Fonseca Pinto (III) Stefano Carlo Filippo Hagen (III)
(I) Departamento de Veterinaria (DVT), Universidade Federal de Vicosa (UFV), Vicosa, MG, Brasil.
(II) Departamento de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP), Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 255, 13635-900, Pirassununga, SP, Brasil. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org. Corresponding author.
(III) Departamento de Cirurgia, USP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Returned by the author 07.19.15
Table 1--Advantages and limitations of the technique of radiography and B-mode and Doppler ultrasound of the thoracic cavity in canine and feline species. Advantages Items reviewed Radiography Ultrasound Amount of -- Best estimate of the pleural amount of pleural effusion effusion (5 cases). Characteristic -- Possible to identify of pleural the echogenicity effusion of the fluid providing qualitative information about its nature: without debris (8 cases) and presence of debris (1 case). Identification -- Allowed the of structures identification of immersed in submerged structures pleural in pleural effusion effusion (6 Cases). Evaluation It allowed Possible to investigate of tissue the location the nature of nodules of lesions and masses (solid or in lung cystic tissue at any differentiation) in profundity in the presence of an the absence of acoustic window (19 pleural effusion cases). Evaluation (10 cases). of lung tissue due Provided to consolidation overview of the (4 Cases). involvement of the thoracic cavity (all cases). Size of the Provided -- lesion overview of the involvement of the thoracic cavity (all cases). Location of -- Allowed the the lesion definition of the lesion in the lung tissue due to sliding sign (16 cases). Location in the chest wall in the absence of sliding sign (2 cases). Vascularity of -- Amplitude Doppler the lesion ultrasound allowed assessment of the pattern of blood vascularization of nodules and masses in lung tissue (16 cases) and to differentiate between vessels and fluid bronchograms (4 cases). Physical -- Facilitates the condition evaluation of dyspneic animals due to the possibility standing position. Limitations Items reviewed Radiography Ultrasound Amount of Underestimated (4 -- pleural cases) or effusion overestimated (1 case) amount of pleural effusion. Characteristic Impossible to -- of pleural establish any effusion relationship to the nature of the liquid. Identification The silhouette -- of structures effect prevents immersed in differentiation of pleural pleural effusions effusion and structures with water radiopacity. Evaluation The technique Impossible to of tissue prevents the assess the lung evaluation of the tissue in the tissue of nodules absence of and masses. acoustic window (8 Cases). Size of the -- Only allowed lesion assessment of lesions that made Contact with the wall of the chest cavity. In this study, the evaluation was guided by the identification of potential acoustic window by radiology (all except one case). Location of In some cases, -- the lesion it was impossible to know the origin of the lesions (lung tissue, chest wall, ribs, pleural cavity, mediastinum or diaphragm) (13 cases). Vascularity of The technique does -- the lesion not allow assessment of the blood vasculature. Physical Was not possible -- condition to perform the laterolateral projections in the animal due to dyspnea. Table 2--Impact of the ultrasound examination in relation to the radiographic examination. Evaluators Impact on the Influenced Did not differential the outcome affect the diagnoses diagnosis Our evaluation 18 (62.06%) 8 (27.58%) 11 (37.93%) (29 animals) Blind evaluation 10 (50%) 2 (10%) 10 (50%) (20 animals)
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||clinica y cirugia; texto en ingles|
|Author:||Pires, Samara Turbay; Hage, Maria Cristina Ferrarini Nunes Soares; Pinto, Ana Carolina Brandao de Ca|
|Date:||Dec 1, 2015|
|Previous Article:||Molecular characterization of Prunus necrotic ringspot virus isolated from rose in Brazil/Caracterizacao molecular de Prunus necrotic ringspot virus...|
|Next Article:||Sphincterodiplostomum musculosum (Digenea, Diplostomidae) in geophagus brasiliensis (Perciformes, Cichlidae) collected in a lake at Dois Corregos,...|