Printer Friendly

Comments on "Highest and Best Use: the von Thunen Connection".

The article "Highest and Best Use: The von Thunen Connection" by Marvin L. Wolverton, MAI, PhD, (Fall 2004) reviews a mathematical model for determining highest and best use--a welcome insight into a subject of critical importance to appraisers.

In the article, the author analyzes the effect that variation of each of the parameters in the equations can have on the outcome. That is, he analyzes all but one, the land capitalization rate, [R.sub.L]. If we extend the author's example, allowing crop 1 and crop 2 to symbolize two similar but different uses, it is not difficult to envision a scenario in which the risk associated with each of those uses is different, leading to different capitalization rates. Thus, even though the calculated land rent (the numerator of the right side of the value equation) for one use might be the greater amount, if the associated capitalization rate is also greater, the value could be the lower of the two. That is, crop 1 could warrant the higher land rent while crop 2 resulted in the higher land value.

The definition of highest and best use should therefore be restricted to reference to value only. Terms such as "land rent" or "return to the land" only confuse the issue and should be avoided. As I had suggested in my letter regarding an earlier article in The Appraisal Journal (see Letters to the Editor,

The Appraisal Journal (Spring 2004): 186.), the following definition will never lead to an inconsistency:
 The probable use of land or improved property that is
 adequately supported and results in the highest value.


Walter M. Kane, MAI

Orangeburg, NY
COPYRIGHT 2005 The Appraisal Institute
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:letters to the editor
Author:Kane, Walter M.
Publication:Appraisal Journal
Article Type:Letter to the Editor
Date:Jan 1, 2005
Words:273
Previous Article:Comments on response to "Subdivision Development: Risk, Profit, and Developer Surveys".
Next Article:Comments on "Private Development as Public Use: New Michigan Case Raises Questions About Power to Condemn Property for Economic Development".


Related Articles
It's a cheap form of propaganda: now they are offering prizes to people who trick newspapers into publishing fake letters.
Highest and best use: the von Thunen connection.
Don't forget to write.
Letters. We like letters.
New research on the nature of letters and their writers.
Education: a new opportunity for residents.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters