Commentary on bioengineering of wheelchairs: the past 50 years.
Most would agree that the greatest changes that have taken place over the past 50 years are in the areas of ability to image the upper limbs; biomechanics (kinematics, especially kinetics) of wheelchair propulsion and transfers; design of wheelchairs from the materials, electronics, software, and fabrication to the style; and human-to-wheelchair interfaces for both manual and power chairs. The most profound difference is that the wheelchairs of today are vastly superior to the wheelchairs of 50 years ago. At the time of publication of Peizer et al.'s article, there was one dominant manufacturer and very few options to include sizes. People could literally memorize the entire catalog. Today, there are more than 100 companies and thousands of models with literally hundreds of thousands of options.
Manual wheelchairs are much lighter, efficient, ergonomic, and socially acceptable. A growing number of clinicians understand the need for matching the design and configuration closely to the needs and abilities of the user. Electric powered wheelchairs (EPWs) share very little in common with their ancestors of 50 years ago. EPWs today have computer-operated interfaces and power controls that were unthinkable at that time. Further, the EPW seat and chassis systems have been separated to be more like a car than a "wheeled chair." EPW chassis often have independent suspension, and seats can range from simple "captain chairs" to fully articulated with power elevation, leg-rest angle, tilt, and recline. Fifty years ago, sports wheelchairs (e.g., racing, rugby, basketball, and hand-cycling) did not exist. Athletes competed in essentially the same chairs that they used everyday. Now, nearly every adaptive sport uses custom-designed wheelchairs and athletic performances are astoundingly better than 50 years ago. People who use wheelchairs are healthier and live longer because science has led to better understanding of the benefits of exercise, adaptive sports and recreation, nutrition, smoking cessation, upper-limb preservation, pressure ulcer prevention, and skills training.
A number of barriers still remain. Although international wheelchair standards exist, they are seldom used in decision making or uniformly applied, leading to high variability in the quality, efficacy, and safety of wheelchairs. Reimbursement policies still vary widely, and the majority of insurers still severely limit access to appropriate quality and functioning wheelchairs. There remain millions of people without access to wheelchairs or the ability to operate current wheelchairs. There remains much to be learned about designing optimal wheelchairs, preventing secondary conditions, matching wheelchairs to user needs, evaluating the interaction of wheelchairs with the built environment, and infusing that knowledge into user and clinical communities.
RORY A. COOPER, PHD
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Cooper, Rory A.|
|Publication:||Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development|
|Date:||Feb 1, 2013|
|Previous Article:||Bioengineering methods of wheelchair evaluation.|
|Next Article:||Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury.|