Printer Friendly

Comadia redtenbacheri (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) pupal development in the laboratory.

Fifteen species of the Cossidae are distributed in the USA, but Comadia redtenbacheri Ham merschmidt (Lepidoptera: Cossidae), the agave redworm, is the only cossid species reported in Mexico. It has the following synonyms: Zeuzera redtenbacheri Hamm., 1848; Bombix agavis Blasquez, 1870; Hypopta chilodora Dyar, 1910 and H. redtenbacheri Dyar, 1937 (Brown 1976). The main agave (Aspargales: Aspargaceae) species in whose rhizomes the agave redworm lives are Agave salmiana Otto ex Salm, A. mapisaga Trel. and A. atrovirens Karw. ex Salm (Camacho et al. 2003). Under field conditions, the eggs of C. redtenbacheri are deposited in mass by females at the bases of the agave leaves. Eggs have an incubation period of 30 to 35 days. After the eggs hatch, the larvae pass to the rhizome of the plant and metamorphose through 7 instars in approximately eight months (Hernandez-Livera et al. 2005; Llanderal-Cazares et al. 2007). Mature larvae leave the agave to pupate in the soil about 5 cm below the surface (Almanza-Valenzuela 2007). The duration of the pupal period is 3.5 to 5.0 months. The adults live only for 3 to 5 days, because they have atrophied mouth parts that prevent feeding. The life cycle is completed in about 1 year (Llanderal-Cazares et al. 2007). Because C. redtenbacheri larvae are suitable for human consumption, they are intensively gathered, causing their over exploitation and consequently the decline of the C. redtenbacheri population and that of its host, which is unearthed to extract the larvae from the rhizome and which is not replanted. Therefore, new knowledge is needed to assure the sustainable use of this food insect (Llanderal-Cazares et al. 2010; Zetina et al. 2011). Moreover there is interest in rearing C. redtenbacheri larvae for commercialization, and in inducing pupation to obtain adults for various uses including basic studies and for their release in production units (Nolasco et al. 2002; Camacho et al. 2003, 2005; Llanderal-Cazares et al. 2007).

The pupa is an important developmental stage from a physiological and morphological perspective. During this stage, development of the major structural differences between immature and adult stages occurs: muscles are formed and inserted into the cuticle and wings and genitalia become fully developed (Mehta 1933; Chapman 1998; Gullan 2010). Many lepidopteran species require one yr to complete their life cycle and have developed an obtect-type pupa, in which a secretion produced by the larvae fastens wings and legs to the body, and, also, the abdomen is relatively immobile (Chapman 1998; Triplehorn & Johnson 2005). To pupate, lepidopteran larvae construct an ovoid cocoon or pupal case, which they consolidate with silk from their salivary glands, soil particles, small stones and even plant fragments (Collin et al. 2010). The cocoon guarantees substantial protection against predators, microorganisms and severe changes in climatic conditions (Guillott 2005).

Initially the pupa of C. redtenbacheri is almost white, but with the passing of days, it darkens. At the tip of the pupal abdomen on the ventral side there are cuticular marks, typical of either males or females that permit the individuals to be sexed (Llanderal-Cazares et al. 2007). The pupa has a series of hooked spikes on the dorsum of the abdomen, which aids in digging up to the soil surface for adult emergence (Brown 1976). Larvae and pupae are affected by microorganisms and by the parasitoids, Lissonota fascipennis Townes (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) (Zetina et al. 2009) and Acantholespesia texana (Aldrich & Webber) (Diptera: Tachinidae) (Zetina et al. 2012), which affect red maguey worm populations. In programs for the breeding of the insect is important to utilize larvae that are of suitable quality to be reared to adults for mating and oviposition (Zetina et al. 2011).

Duration of pupation in any species is determined by both biotic and abiotic factors. The most important of the latter are RH, which affects dehydration, temperature, which has an influence in the duration of the life cycle, and photoperiod, which regulates daily or seasonal physiological activities (Vejar 2004). Soil is another important factor because its texture and structure can limit insect development when different from that to which a species is adapted (Romero & Villanueva 2000). The combination of environmental factors determines successful pupation, which is a critical stage in the insect's development that can become complicated under confinement and can limit adult emergence (Gillott 2005). Environmental components are easily measured, but their impacts on insect populations are difficult to determine; and if these effects are not controlled, it is impossible to establish a rearing method (Montoya et al. 2008).

Information on the pupal stage of the agave redworm is essential for its management under confined conditions. Which of the instars are able to pupate is still undefined. Currently, to establish colonies of this species for research or other purposes, larvae must be gathered in the field. Thus, this study was conducted to define the conditions adequate for pupation of C. redtenbacheri, relative to larval handling during their gathering and collection, weight at the onset of pupation, and the type and moisture content of substrate required for successful pupation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Description of the Larval Collection Area

Larvae used as breeding stock were obtained from different sites in the northwestern region of the State of Mexico (Ixtapaluca, Coatepec, Pyramids, Otumba, San Pedro, Tezoutlalpan and Tianguistengo), as well as from nearby communities belonging to the state of Hidalgo (El Puerto, Pozos and Pena Colorada). Diverse sites were selected to guarantee broad genetic variability, an important aspect in insect rearing, according to Parra (1979).

These sites form part of the province of the neovolcanic belt, which is formed by the subprovince of the plains and mountains of Queretaro and Hidalgo and the subprovince of the Anahuac lakes and volcanoes. It forms part of the hydrological regions of the Lerma-Santiago and El Balsas, and a small portion of that of the Panuco. The climate in this area is temperate subhumid with summer rains and warm subhumid winters (INEGI 2012).

Subprovince of the Plains and Mountains of Queretaro and Hidalgo

This subprovince penetrates the northern part of the state of Mexico at 3 points and covers 1,415.29 [km.sup.2] (6.08% of the state's total area). The municipalities included in this area are Polotitlan and Soyaniquilpan, as well as part of Jilotepec, Aculco, Acambay, Chapa de Mota and Hueypoxtla. Although there is no great diversity of soils, they are very fertile and suitable for agriculture and livestock raising (INEGI 2012).

Subprovince of the Anahuac Lakes and Volcanoes in the State of Mexico

This subprovince occupies 14,315.69 [km.sup.2] (61.6%) of the state's total area, encompassing 84 municipalities and part of another 18. There are 27 soil types, among them are different classes of cambisols, fluvisols, and solonchaks, as well as eutric planosol, calcareous phaeozem, calcareous vertisol, calcareous regosol and humic gleisol (INEGI 2012).

Four samples were collected, 2 in Sep 2010 and 2 in Oct 2011. The samples collected in both yr were of 2 types: a) "no manipulation" when larvae were extracted from the agave rhizome by a single person and transported carefully to avoid excessive handling, and b) "commercial", which comprised larvae acquired at different places where diverse persons were selling the larvae they had collected without special care during their extraction from the host agave rhizome and, generally, with much manipulation during the process of gathering, collection and sale.

Larvae of sixth and seventh instars according to Hernandez-Livera et al. (2005) weighing 0.40 g to almost 1.0 g were selected since, considering previous observations, they probably would initiate pupation once placed in a suitable substrate. Fifth instars, which weighed between 0.30 and 0.39 g, were confined to chambers with soil to define their pupation capacity and the possible relationship between larval weight and adult sex, and for comparison with the last 2 instars weighing 0.40 g or more.

Laboratory Work

In 3 experiments conducted in 2010, the selected larvae were induced to pupate between Sep 30 and Oct 12. In order to integrate the effects of different conditions evaluated on the population collected in 2010 and to test a more easily managed substrate, a fourth experiment was set up from 10 to 15 Oct 2011. Treatments were kept in 24 h of darkness at 40-50% RH and 20 [+ or -] 5 [degrees]C by using a humidifier and heaters. Because of their gregarious habit, C. redtenbacheri larvae under confined conditions tend to construct common pupation chambers, causing contamination and mortality. It was therefore necessary to keep the individuals separate. The receptacles used as individual pupation chambers were made of polyduct tubes (10 cm long x 3.18 cm diam), placed in 36 x 29 x 12 cm plastic trays, each with a holding capacity for 50 tubes. Into each of the tubes, a layer of substrate 5 cm deep was added for pupation, following Roubos & Liburd (2010) for pupation of the species, Dasineura oxycoccana (Johnson) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) (Fig. 1). Cocoons from each of the first 3 experiments were destructively sampled to determine the degree to which the individuals had advanced in their transformation into pupae.

1. Evaluation of Substrates and Moisture Content on Pupation and Adult Emergence

The substrate treatments, with and without moisture, consisted of 4 trays each with 50 "commercial" larvae per type of substrate, i.e., S1, soil from the areas of agaves where the larvae were collected; S2, 75:25 mixture of this soil and vermiculite (INSULEX[R], Aislantes y acusticos, S. A.), and S3, peat moss (Kekkila[R]). Two trays of each substrate were moistened with 100 mL water sprayed with an atomizer every 3 wk. In this experiment the numbers of emerged adults were recorded and used as the dependent variable analyzed with logistic regression (PROC GENMOD), to determine the odd-ratio of adult emergence vs. total larvae by soil type and humidity treatment.

The basic structure of the linear model used on the logistic regression structure was:

[mu] = [[beta].sub.0] + [[beta].sub.1] [I.sub.CH] + [[beta].sub.2] [[beta].sub.S1] + [[beta].sub.3] [I.sub.S2]

where [mu] is the linear model, [[beta].sub.0] is the intercept representing the combined effect of lack of moisture and substrate type S3, [I.sub.CH] is an indicator variable equal to 1 when the moisture treatment is present, but zero otherwise, and [I.sub.S1] is an indicator variable equal to 1 when substrate 1 (S1) treatment is present, but zero otherwise. Further [I.sub.S2] is an indicator variable equal to 1 when substrate 2 (S2) treatment is present, but zero otherwise, and [[beta].sub.1], [[beta].sub.2] and [[beta].sub.3] are the parameters to be estimated.

2. Effect of Larval Manipulation and Moisture on Adult Emergence

Six trays were set up each with 50 "commercial" larvae placed individually in the polyduct tubes. Half of the trays received water sprayed in the same way as in the above experiment. This protocol was repeated with "no manipulation" larvae. The pupation substrate was soil from the areas of agave that hosted the redworm. In this experiment also the numbers of emerged adults were recorded and used as the dependent variable analyzed with logistic regression (PROC GENMOD) to determine the odd-ratio of adult emergence vs. total larvae by the effect of the presence of moisture and manipulation.

The basic structure of the linear model use in the logistic regression structure was:

[mu] = [[beta].sub.0] + [[beta].sub.1] [I.sub.CM] + [[beta].sub.2] [I.sub.CH]

where [mu], is the linear model, [[beta].sub.0] is the intercept representing the combined effect of lack of moisture and manipulation, [I.sub.CM] is an indicator variable equal to 1 when manipulation factor is present, but zero otherwise, [I.sub.CH] is an indicator variable equal to 1 when moisture is present, but zero otherwise, and [[beta].sub.1] and [[beta].sub.2] are the parameters to be estimated.

3. Pupation, Adult Emergence, and Proportion of Sexes by Larval Weight Class

The experiment was set up by placing fifth instar larvae weighing 0.30 to 0.39 g on the same tray, and those of sixth and seventh instars weighing 0.40 g or more on another tray. Each tray with 50 larvae was an experimental unit and was replicated 4 times. All trays were irrigated. New soil was used as substrate in half of the trays, and reused soil in the other half of the trays to determine whether reused soil affects pupal development. The results for adult emergence by larval weight and soil condition were analyzed by logistic regression (PROC GENMOD). The factors analyzed related to the odd-ratio of total adults emerged vs. total larvae taking as factors the larval weights from 0.30 a 0.39 g and 0.40 g or more. The data on proportion of sexes with respect to weight class were examined with the chi squared test ([chi square]).

The basic structure of the linear model used in the logistic regression structure was:

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

where [mu], is the linear model, [beta].sub.0] is the intercept representing the combined effect of weight > 0.40 g and reused soil, [I.sub.p.30 a 0.39 g] is an indicator variable equal to 1 when the larval weight was 0.30 a 0.39 g, but zero otherwise, [I.sub.SN] is an indicador variable equal to 1 when the new soil is present, but zero otherwise and [[beta].sub.1] and [[beta].sub.2] are the parameters to be estimated.

Through destructive sampling we observed that the pupal period lasts approximately 5 months, and in the first month the insects remain as larvae within cocoons (Llanderal-Cazares et al. 2007). The larvae initiated pupation between 25 Sep and 2 Oct 2010. In total, 4 samplings were done: #1 (14 Dec) at 2.5 months after placing the larvae under conditions of pupation; #2 and #3, after 3 and 4.5 months (14 Jan and 14 Feb 2011, respectively), and #4 at 5 months (3 Mar 2011). Each sampling consisted in selecting at random from different trays belonging to the 3 previous experiments, one tube with a cocoon from each tray, i.e., a total of 41 cocoons. In undeveloped individuals, the stage (larval or pupal) at which growth had ceased was observed and the possible cause (fungi, bacteria or parasites) was determined.

4. Effect of Larval Manipulation, Type of Substrate and Moisture on Adult Emergence

We used 16 trays, half with the "commercial" larvae and the other half with the "no manipulation" larvae. Within each test 4 trays had substrate type S1 (soil from agave areas where the larvae were collected) and the other 4 had substrate type S4 (50:50 mixture of S1 and vermiculite). Moisture was provided to 2 trays with S1 and to 2 trays with S4. Finally, the number of emerged adults per treatment was recorded and the results were analyzed with logistic regression (PROC GENMOD).

The basic structure of the linear model used in the logistic regression structure was:

[mu] = [[beta].sub.0] + [[beta].sub.1] [I.sub.CM] + [[beta].sub.2] [[beta].sub.CH] + [[beta].sub.3] [I.sub.S4]

where [mu], is the linear model, [[beta].sub.0] is the intercept representing the combined effect of lack moisture and manipulation and Soil type S1, [I.sub.CM] is an indicator variable equal to 1 when the moisture treatment is present, but zero otherwise, [I.sub.CH] is an indicator variable equal to 1 when moisture is present, but zero otherwise, [I.sub.S4] is an indicator variable equal to 1 when Soil 2 (S2) treatment is present, but zero otherwise, and [[beta].sub.1], [[beta].sub.2] and [[beta].sub.3] are the parameters to be estimated.

The formulation used in all the experiments allowed us to evaluate the effect of the treatments based on the significance of the additive parameters in relation to the base parameter ([[beta].sub.0]). When the other additive parameters become statistically significant ([alpha] [less than or equal to] 0.05), it was possible to conclude that the odds-ratio comparison among treatments is statistically different.

The [chi square] test is used in observation studies, in which it is common to obtain data collected simultaneously for 2 variables classified by their provenance in order to test the hypothesis that the frequency in the categories of one variable is independent of the frequency in the second variable (Herrera & Garcia 2010). Analysis of these tests was done by statistical software SAS Institute (2008). Using these models, it was possible to identify in the 3 experiments, which conditions were better for the development of the insect.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

1. Evaluation of Substrates and Moisture on Pupation and Adult Emergence

Table 1 shows the results on pupae confined in chambers with different types of substrates. There were no significant differences in numbers of emerged adults among substrates, nor did moisture have a significant effect (an 18% average odds-ratio of emerged vs. total). It can thus be deduced that the agave redworm has a high capacity to pupate in soil with different texture and structure, even in the absence of supplemental moisture. This should greatly facilitate management of the insect under artificial conditions, although it might be helpful to continue experimentation with other types of substrates. According to Madrigal (2001), moisture should be kept at 75%, since low moisture contents produce desiccation, while high moisture contents favor fungal and bacterial growth. Soto-Manitiu et al. (1997) postulated that for Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) soil moisture affected the duration of its pupal period. Their study found, however, that it is atmospheric relative humidity that has a strong influence on adult emergence.

2. Effect of Larval Manipulation and Moisture on Adult Emergence

According to the results shown in Table 2, the probability of adult emergence is significantly higher from "no manipulation" larvae + no moisture, while emergence from "commercial" larvae drops from 27% to 18%. The odds ratio of commercial larvae to no manipulation larvae suggests that the probability of adult emergence is 40% lower from the commercial larvae. In insect rearing, it has been determined that direct handling of the larvae must be minimal during their entire development, since handling causes stress (Madrigal 2001). Of the "no manipulation" larval samples, 15.3% were damaged, diseased or parasitized, while in the "commercial" sample the percentage was 13.2%; this could indicate that the gatherers tended to differentially select healthy undamaged larvae, although imperceptible damage and mistreatment during distribution and sale were not considered.

In Table 2, it can be seen that moisture content was somewhat significant (0.0662) in increasing adult emergence from 24% and 35% in "commercial" and "no manipulation" larvae, respectively; a result that differs from the previous experiment in which moisture was not significant and had negative values. In contrast, Vejar (2004) reported this factor as one of the most important in rearing insects. This would point to the need for additional investigations on the effect of watering the pupation trays.

3. Pupation, Adult Emergence and Proportion of Sexes by Larval Weight

Larvae obtained from agave rhizomes are of diverse sizes, and it is important to know the minimum weight at which they can still transform into pupae. In this study, it was determined that larvae weighing as little as 0.30 g can successfully metamorphose into pupae and adults. Indeed these small larvae were not significantly different from heavier larvae in their capacity to pupate, as observed in the logistic regression analysis (Table 3). It should be mentioned that the weight range is small, and this could be the reason that there are no significant differences. It would be necessary to perform tests with smaller larvae to determine the minimum weight at which they can still continue to pupate. Nolasco et al. (2002) considered that the larvae extracted from the plant by collectors could be too immature to pupate. Camacho et al. (2003, 2005) induced pupation of larvae, which-based on the size of the cephalic capsule-were considered to be in the last 2 instars; these workers assumed that these larvae would be the only ones capable of completing the pupation process. However, the earlier instars that they used remained several weeks in boxes with soil, but the authors did not indicate whether they pupated.

The statistical analysis showed no significant variability in adult emergence by effect of a recently prepared pupation substrate or a reused substrate (Table 3). Re-use of substrate would be an economic advantage in rearing this insect. Madrigal (2001) reported that for some species, re-use of the pupation substrate requires it to be sterilized, as in the case of the parasitoid Telenomus alsophilae Vierek (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae).

By means of a contingency table (Table 4), we found that lower weight (0.30-0.39 g) fifth instar larvae are as capable of pupating as the heavier weight (> 0.40 g) sixth and seventh instars. Also we determined that there is a certain relationship between weight and sex of emerged adult (Table 4), as occurs in many Lepidoptera species (Allen et al. 2011). The smaller-sized larvae tend to develop into male adults (41.5%), while the larger larvae tend to develop into female adults (29.1%), although some males, as larvae, also weighed > 0.40 g (Table 4). Statistical significance for the [chi square] test was < 0.0001. Thus, if a sample that includes larvae of both weight ranges is taken, the probability that adults of both sexes will emerge increases.

Destructive Sampling and Progression of Metamorphosis

When larvae were placed in the pupation chamber, it was observed that most dug into the soil, and that most of those that remained on the surface died. There were also cases in which larvae having dug into the substrate later returned to the surface and most of these did not survive.

With the first destructive sampling (Fig. 2), we determined that the larvae inside their cocoons remained in the larval stage for 2.5 months. At the second sampling date, prepupae were found and 7.3% of the larvae were inactive. The percentage of inactive larvae increased to 17% in Feb. On 3 Mar 2012, five months after pupation induction, 12% had become pupae and 14.6% were prepupae (less mobile, lighter color and shorter body). Once we had found pupae, we waited almost a month for the first adults to emerge. The period of adult emergence extended to 24 May of the same year (Fig. 2).

Once the cocoon was formed, larvae required approximately 5 months to become adults. The dead C. redtenbacheri found during destructive sampling were classified and both the development stage at which the transformation process ceased and the possible cause of death were recorded (Fig. 3). We found that 39.6% of the individuals died in the larval stage because of the entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria spp., which causes hardening and mummification. Beauveria has been reported as the cause of death in several insect species (Castillo et al. 2009). For Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) (Tephritidae), Chaverri et al. (1999) determined that a percentage of pupae do not reach emergence because of damage by fungi and parasitoids. We found bacterial infection to be the second most prevalent cause of death. This was manifested in the soft consistency and characteristic odor of infected larvae. The third cause of mortality was parasitoids. Also, one mummified pupa was found. Approximately 1 month before and during adult emergence, the parasitoids of C. redtenbacheri reported by Zetina et al. (2009, 2011, 2012), emerged out of the cocoons. First came the tachinid A. texana and, at the end of the period, the ichneumonid, L. fascipennis.

4. Effect of Larval Manipulation, Substrate Type and Moisture on Adult Emergence

The data shown in Table 5 corroborate that manipulated larvae had less vigor to complete the life cycle than the no manipulated larvae. The 50:50 mixture of soil and vermiculite (S4) was more easily managed and cheaper than S2 substrate used in 2010, which had 25% less vermiculite. S4 was significantly different from the collection site soil (S1), and it increased pupation by a 2.07 odds-ratio. It was also shown that the pupation process can occur without supplemental moisture. Based on these results, the use of larvae for breeding stock that have not been handled much and a 50:50 mixture of soil with vermiculite for pupation substrate are recommended.

Figure 4 shows the likelihoods of adult emergence in percentages, according to the relationships among the treatment variables. The highest percentages are found in the treatments comprising non-manipulated larvae. The effect of the substrate (S4) raises the likelihood of adult emergence to 50%, if moisture is not present. In this experiment the effect of manipulation was very important since the reference case, which is the intercept, indicates 33% adult emergence for non-manipulated larvae, while that of manipulated larvae is only 1.5%.

Because C. redtenbacheri is a borer, the study of its biology and behavior is complicated and its rearing in the laboratory is difficult. Forchler & Nordin (1989) state that the study of wood borers is often limited because methods for rearing a suitable number of insects are lacking. In the case of the maguey redworm, until now the only way to have sufficient larvae for study was to acquire wild populations. Collection of these populations is difficult because the host agave rhizome must be destroyed to extract the larvae. Once collected, the larvae are kept in overcrowded receptacles until they are used, causing contamination and deterioration. Consequently, the number of healthy individuals that could serve as breeding stock is reduced. Zetina et al. (2011) reported a model for predicting parasitism in C. redtenbacheri larvae and they mention the need to find procedures to avoid losses of material, costs and time during acquisition of breeding stock. They comment that a redworm larva in good condition will be more likely to reach adulthood and reproduce. The results obtained in this study can improve methods for obtaining adults through selection of the larvae by provenance, health and size, as well as for conservation of the pupae.

Caption: Fig. 1. Characteristics of Comadia redtenbacheri pupation chambers allowing for control of individual pupae. These chambers had a layer of soil at the bottom and were supported in plastic trays.

Caption: Fig. 2. Degree of progress, in months, toward transformation of Comadia redtenbacheri larvae weighing 0.30 g or more into adults.

Caption: Fig. 3. Number of Comadia redtenbacheri individuals that did not develop to adults because of possible desiccation, disease or parasitism. N = 164 cocoons taken at random in the 4 destructive samplings during the period of pupation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was partially funded by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT), as part of Project 166898 "Biologia de Comadia redtenbacheri Hamm."

REFERENCES CITED

AGRESTI, A. 2002. Categorical data analysis. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.

ALLEN, C. E., ZWAAN, B. J., AND BRAKEFIELD, P. M. 2011. Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56: 445-64.

ALMANZA-VALENZUELA, E. I. 2007. Establecimiento de larvas de Comadia redtenbacheri Hamm. en plantas de maguey en invernadero. Tesis de Maestria en Ciencias. Colegio de Postgraduados. MExico. pp.

BROWN, R. M. 1976. A revision of the North American Comadia (Cossidae). J. Res. Lepidoptera 14: 189-212.

CAMACHO, A. D., SANCHEZ, H., JIMENEZ, J. L., AND NOLASCO, M. A. 2003. Observaciones en condiciones de laboratorio de la biologia del "gusano rojo del maguey" Comadia redtenbacheri H. (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Entomol. Mexicana 2: 281-287.

CAMACHO, A. D., NOLASCO M. A., JIMENEZ J. L., AND RIVERA, F. T. 2005. Reintroduccion de maguey y cultivo del gusano rojo Comadia redtenbacheri H. (Lepidop-tera: Cossidae). Entomol. Mexicana 4: 599-603.

CASTILLO, A., GOMEZ J. F., INFANTE F., AND VEGA, F. E. 2009. Susceptibilidad del parasitoide Phymastichus coffea a Beauveria bassiana en condiciones de laboratorio. Neotrop. Entomol. 38: 665-670.

CHAPMAN, R. F. 1998. The Insects: Structure and Function. 4th ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.

CHAVERRI, L. G., SOTO-MANITIU, J., AND JIRON, L. F. 1999. Notas sobre la biologia y ecologia de Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae), plaga de plantas anacardiAceas en AmErica tropical. II. Formas adultas. Agron. Mesoamericana 10: 99-102.

COLLIN, M. A., MITA, K., SEHNAL, F., AND HAYASHI, CH. Y. 2010. Molecular evolution of lepidopteran silk proteins: Insights from the ghost moth, Hepialus californicus. J. Mol. Evol. 70: 519-529.

FORSCHLER, B. T., AND NORDIN, G. L. 1989. Techniques for rearing the wood borers Prionoxystus robiniae (Leopidoptera: Cossidae) and Paranthrene dollii (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae). Florida Entomol. 72: 224-226.

GUILLOTT, C. 2005. Entomology. 3th ed. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

GULLAN, P. J. AND CRANSTON, P. S. 2010. The insects. An Outline of Entomology. 4th edn. Wiley-Blackwell. Oxford, UK.

HERNANDEZ-LIVERA, R. A., LLANDERAL-CAZARES, C., CASTILLO-MARQUEZ, E., VALDEZ-CARRASCO, J., AND NIETO-HERNANDEZ, R. 2005. Identification of larval instars of Comadia redtenbacheri (Hamm) (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Agrociencia 39: 539-544.

HERRERA, H. J. G., AND GARCIA, C. A. 2010. Bioestadistica en ciencias veterinarias. Procedimientos de analisis de datos con SAS. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Espana.

INEGI. 2012. Fisiografia. (http://mapserver.inegi. gob.mx/geografia/espanol/estados/edomex/fisio. cfm?c=444&e=21, August 2012).

LLANDERAL-CAZARES, C., NIETO-HERNANDEZ R., ALMANZA-VALENZUELA, I., Y ORTEGA-ALVAREZ, C. 2007. Biologia Y Comportamiento De Comadia Redtenbacheri (Hamm) (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Entomol. Mexicana 6: 252-255.

LLANDERAL-CAZARES, C., DE LOS SANTOS-POSADAS, H. M., ALMANZA-VALENZUELA, I., NIETO-HERNANDEZ, R., AND CASTILLEJOS-CRUZ, C. 2010. Establecimiento del gusano rojo en plantas de maguey en invernadero. Acta Zoologica Mexicana 26: 1-6.

MADRIGAL, A. 2001. Cria de insectos en laboratorio, pp. 266-295 In A. Madrigal C. [ed.] Fundamentos de Control Biologico de Plagas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellin, Colombia.

MEHTA, D. R. 1933. Memoirs: On the development of the male genitalia and the efferent genital duct in Lepidoptera. The Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science. 76: 35-61.

MONTOYA, P., FLORES, S., AND TOLEDO, J. 2008. Effect of rainfall and soil moisture on survival of adults and immature stages of Anastrepha ludens and A. oblicua (Diptera: Thephritidae) under semifield conditions. Florida Entomol. 91: 643-650.

NOLASCO, M. A., JIMENEZ, L. J., Y CAMACHO, A. D. 2002. Introduccion a la pupacion y colonizacion del gusano rojo del maguey Comadia redtenbacheri H. (Lepi-doptera: Cossidae). Entomol. Mexicana 1: 125-130.

PARRA, P. J. R. 1979. Biologia dos insectos. Universidad de Sao Paulo ESALQ. Piracicaba: ESALQ.

ROMERO, R. F., Y VILLANUEVA, V. C. 2000. Resistencia vegetal a insectos y Acaros. Universidad Autonoma de Chapingo. Chapingo, Estado de Mexico, Mexico.

ROUBOS, C. R., AND LIBURD, O. E. 2010. Pupation and emergence of blueberry gall midge, Dasineura oxycoc-cana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), under varying temperature conditions. Florida Entomol. 93: 8283-290.

SAS INSTITUTE. 2008. SAS/STAT User's guide. Version 9.2. 1st edn. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.

SOTO-MANITIU, J., CHAVERRI, L. G., Y JIRON, L. F. 1997. Notas sobre la biologia y ecologia de Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae), plaga de plantas anacardiaceas en America tropical. II. Formas inmaduras. Agronomia Mesoamericana 8: 116-20.

TRIPLEHORN, C. A., AND JOHNSON, N. F. 2005. Borror and Delong's Introduction to the study of insects. 7th ed. Thomson Brooks/Cole. Belmont, CA., USA.

VEJAR, C. G. 2004. Importancia e infraestructura para mantener crias de insectos, pp. 3-17 In N. Bautista-Martinez, H. Bravo-Mojica, y C. Chavarin-Palacio [eds.] Cria de Insectos Plaga y Organismos Beneficos. CONABIO, Mexico, D. F., Mexico.

ZETINA, D. H., LLANDERAL-CAZARES, C., RUIZ-CANCINO, E., AND KHALAIM, A. I. 2009. Registro para Mexico de Lissonota fascipennis Townes (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), como parasitoide del gusano rojo del maguey. Acta Zool. Mexicana (n. s.). 25: 655-657.

ZETINA, D. H., LLANDERAL-CAZARES, C., AND DE LOS SANTOS-POSADAS, H. M. 2011. Logistic regression analysis to predict parasitism in larvae of Comadia redtenbacheri Hammerschmidt (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Entomotropica 26: 1-6.

ZETINA, D. H., LLANDERAL, C., AND HUERTA, H. 2012. Acantholespesia texana: A new report for Mexico, as a parasitoid of Comadia redtenbacheri Hamm. Southwestern Entomol. 37: 235-237.

K. MIRANDA-PERKINS (1), C. LLANDERAL-CAZARES (1), H. M. DE LOS SANTOS-POSADAS (1), L. PORTILLO- MARTINEZ (2) AND A. L. VIGUERAS-GUZMAN (2)

(1) Colegio de Postgraduados. Campus Montecillo, 56230 Montecillo, Estado de Mexico, Mexico

(2) Universidad de Guadalajara. Departamento de Botanica y Zoologia, 45101. A. Post 139, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico

* Corresponding author; E-mail: llcelina@colpos.mx

TABLE 1. EFFECT OF VARIOUS SUBSTRATES AND SUPPLEMENTAL
MOISTURE ON ADULT EMERGENCE OF COMADIA REDTENBACHERI.

                     Independent                 Estimated   Parameter
Parameter             Variable              DF     value       error

Intercept   [beta] (No moisture + S3 (3))   1    -1.6926      0.2296
Moisture    [I.sup.o] (With moisture)       1    -0.3624      0.2271
Substrate   [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT    1     0.0342     -0.1983
              REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]
Substrate   [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT    1     0.0769     -0.4921
              REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

Parameter          95% CI       P-value   Odds ratio

Intercept   -2.1611   -1.2578   <0.0001
Moisture    -0.8061    0.0863    0.1166       0.69
Substrate   -0.1983    0.8936    0.2171       1.41

Substrate   -0.3963    0.726     0.5695       1.17

(1) Soil from areas of agave where larvae were collected

(2) S2: 75:25 mixture soil and vermiculite

(3) S3: peat moss. Linear model = [mu] = [[beta].sub.0] +
[[beta].sub.1][I.sub.CH] + [[beta].sub.2][I.sub.S1] +
[[beta].sub.3][I.sub.S2]

TABLE 2. EFFECT OF ROUGHNESS OF HANDLING LARVAE AND SUBSTRATE
MOISTURE ON ADULT EMERGENCE OF COMADIA REDTENBACHERI.

                      Independent                Estimated   Parameter
Parameter               Variable            DF     value       error

Intercept      [[beta].sub.0] (no           1     -0.9609     0.1665
                 commercial manipulation
                 + no moisture)
Manipulation   [I.sub.CM] (commercial       1     -0.5082     0.1958
                 manipulation)
Moisture       [I.sub.CH] (With moisture)   1      0.3583     0.1951

                                              Odds
Parameter             95% CI       P-value    ratio

Intercept      -1.4045   -0.7603   <0.0001

Manipulation   -0.875    -01175     0.0094    0.60

Moisture       -0.0276    0.7267    0.0662    1.43

The pupation substrate was soil from the areas of agave that
hosted the redworm Linear model = [mu] = [[beta].sub.0] +
[[beta].sub.1][I.sub.CM] + [[beta].sub.2][I.sub.CH].

Note: Commercial operations to extract larvae from underground
rhizomes of agave plants are performed rapidly, and such rough
handling may be stressful to the larvae. In contrast laboratory
personnel exercised great care not to stress larvae being
extracted from rhizomes.

TABLE 3. COMADIA REDTENBACHERI PUPATION CAPACITY AND ADULT
EMERGENCE RELATIVE TO LARVAL WEIGHTS OF 0.3-0.39 G AND >
0.4 G, AS WELL AS NEW VS. RE-USED SUBSTRATE.

                        Independent                     Estimated
Parameter                 variable                 DF     value

Intercept   [beta] (> 0.4 g+ Re-used substrate)    1     -2.0661
Weight      [I.sup.0] (0.3-0.39 g)                 1     -0.2899
Substrate   [I.sup.P.sub.SN] (New substrate (1))   1     0.4276

            Parameter                                 Odds
Parameter     error            95% CI       P-value   ratio

Intercept    0.1780     -1.4045   -0.7603   <0.0001
Weight       0.2613     -0.875    -0.1175   0.2672    0.74
Substrate    0.2627     -0.0276   0.7267    0.1036    1.53

(1) Soil used for the first time as a substrate for pupation.
Linear model = [mu] = [[beta].sub.0] + [[beta].sub.1][I.sub.p]
+ [[beta].sub.2][I.sub.SN].

TABLE 4. COMADIA REDTENBACHERI ADULT EMERGENCE AND PROPORTION OF
FEMALES AND MALES RELATIVE TO LARVAL WEIGHT.

Number/
Percentage   Weight (g)   Female   Male    Total

             0.30- 0.39   6        37      43
                          6.74     41.57   48.31
               > 0.40     26       20      46
                          29.21    22.47   51.69
               Total      32       57      89
                          35.96    64.04   100

TABLE 5. EFFECT OF SUBSTRATES, MANIPULATION AND
MOISTURE ON COMADIA REDTENBACHERI ADULT EMERGENCE.

                                                 Estimated   Parameter
Parameter         Independent Variable      DF     value       error

Intercept      [beta] (SM (1) + no          1     -0.7068     0.1772
                 moisture + S1 (2))
Manipulation   [I.sup.0] (Commercial        1     -3.3031     0.3382
                 manipulation)
Moisture       [I.sup.CM] (With moisture)   1     -0.1559     0.1975
Substrate      [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION     1      0.7304     0.1990
               NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

                                             Odds
Parameter             95% CI       P-value   ratio

Intercept      -1.0599   -0.3639   <0.0001

Manipulation   -4.0354   -2.6962   <0.0001   0.03

Moisture       -0.5441    0.2310    0.4301   0.85
Substrate       0.3430    1.1240    0.0002   2.07

(1) SM: no commercial manipulation.

(2) S1: Soil from areas of agave where larvae were collected.

(3) S4: 50:50 mixture soil and vermiculite. Linear model = [mu] =
[[beta].sub.0] + [[beta].sub.1][I.sub.CM] + [[beta].sub.2]
[I.sub.CH] + [[beta].sub.3][I.sub.S4].

Fig. 4. Histogram of Comadia redtenbacheri adult emergence
percentages by treatment. CM: commercial manipulation, SM: No
commercial manipulation, S1: Soil from areas where larvae were
collected, S4: 50:50 mixture soil:vermiculite.

    CM             CM            SM              SM
No moisture   With moisture   No moisture   With moisture

S1  S4           S1   S4        S1  S4         S1   S4

2   3           1.5    3        33  50         29   46

Note: Table made from bar graph.


----------

Please note: Some tables or figures were omitted from this article.
COPYRIGHT 2013 Florida Entomological Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Miranda-Perkins, K.; Llanderal-Cazares, C.; De Los Santos-Posadas, H.M.; Portillo-Martinez, L.; Vigu
Publication:Florida Entomologist
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1MEX
Date:Dec 1, 2013
Words:6092
Previous Article:Morphology of the digestive tract of Cladomorphus phyllinus (Phasmatodea: Phasmidae).
Next Article:Description of immature stages of Melanaethus crenatus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Cydnidae: Cydninae: Geotomini), with notes on oviposition,...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters