Printer Friendly

Colton v. Ashcroft.

U.S. District Court


Colton v. Ashcroft, 299 F.Supp.2d 681 (E.D.Ky. 2004). A federal prisoner filed a petition for habeas corpus relief alleging that the federal Bureau of Prison's new regulation, which would delay his release to a halfway house until only ten percent of his sentence remained, violated the notice and comment provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). The district court granted the prisoner's motion for a preliminary injunction. The court held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act's (PLRA) exhaustion requirements did not apply to a habeas petition. The court noted that the public interest would be served by the grant of an injunction and that the prisoner would be irreparably harmed in the absence of an injunction. The court ordered the prisoner to be immediately transferred to a halfway house without regard to the new regulation. (FMC-Lexington, Kentucky, Federal Bureau of Prisons)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LIABILITY
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Previous Article:Brown v. Mitchell.
Next Article:Cooper v. Office of Sheriff of Will County.

Related Articles
State lawyers press defense of suicide law.
Assisted suicide ruling expected by late April.
Gun rights guaranteed?
Second thoughts. (Ashcroft's 'Reasonable Restrictions').
An ideologue at Justice.
John Ashcroft: making a federal case out of sin.
Report belies Ashcroft Probe cites credible claims of rights violations.
Colton v. Ashcroft.
Colton v. Ashcroft.
Oregon suicide law comes to high court.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters