Printer Friendly

Coalition Perceives Benefit in Country-of-Origin Food Labeling.

A coalition of nearly 90 organizations is calling on the Senate Agriculture Committee to include language requiring mandatory country-of-origin labeling for fresh produce and meat products in the omnibus farm bill. In letters to panel Chairman Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and ranking member Dick Lugar (R-Ind.), the coalition urges support of 5 280 (the Consumer Right to Know Act) in the farm bill. That proposal, introduced last February, would require retailers of beef, lamb, pork and perishable agricultural commodities to inform consumers at the final point of sale of the country of origin of the commodities. Food service establishments would be exempt. The coalition consists mainly of state consumer, livestock, fruit and vegetable and other organizations.

The letter claims that U.S. consumers prefer to know the country in which their food is produced. Under S 280, fresh produce must be grown and processed in the United States and meat products must be from animals born, raised and slaughtered in the United States to be labeled as "Made in the USA." Currently, there is nothing stopping U.S. fruit, vegetable or meat producers from putting a "Product of the USA" label on their products. Under S 280, these commodities would be required to carry country-of-origin labeling, and it would be the responsibility of the retailer to make certain labels were attached. The bill also would grant USDA the authority to coordinate enforcement with each state.

The coalition notes that manufactured goods sold in the United States have carried mandatory country-of-origin labels since the 1930s. "Today, at a time when retailers sell fresh produce from dozens of countries, our nation's fruits and vegetables need to carry that same important information," according to the groups' letter to Harkin and Lugar. The House recently passed a country-of-origin labeling measure for fresh produce as part of its farm bill package.
COPYRIGHT 2001 Informa Economics, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Comment:Coalition Perceives Benefit in Country-of-Origin Food Labeling.
Publication:Food & Drink Weekly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 5, 2001
Words:305
Previous Article:House Democrat's Anti-Terrorism Bill Gives $725 Million to Protect Food Supply.
Next Article:European Commission Extends Safety Standard Compliance Period to European Meat Processors.
Topics:


Related Articles
AFFI Battles Proposed Country Of Origin Labeling Requirement For Imported Meat, Meat Products.
USDA delays release of final country-of-origin labeling rules.
USDA issues guidelines for interim voluntary country of origin labeling markings; frozen produce affected under new guidelines. (AFFI's Washington...
AFFI leads frozen food industry in the 21st century.
Industry innovators attempt to unravel the implications of country-of-origin labeling.
Congress urged to maintain full funding of COOL.
USDA files rule and cost benefit analysis of COOL.
Senate Ag appropriations includes COOL provision.
Senators and ag group strategize to ensure COOL program is left unchanged.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |