Printer Friendly

Coadjoint Formalism: Nonorthogonal Basis Problems.

1. Introduction

Spectral numerical methods are increasingly used to solve differential equations, even when fractional derivatives appear. Concerning these methods, they frequently use orthogonal functions [1], in order to ease the calculations and to preserve the basis elements when dimensional expansions are necessary.

This is an important advantage when operational matrices are used, because if it is necessary to extend an orthogonal basis of functions from dimensions m to m + 1, only the new element must be calculated with all the former elements preserved [2, 3]. If the basis functions are not orthogonal, this assumption is not true.

However, there are some situations that, even for numerical methods with operational matrices [4], solution of differential equations demands new basis of functions [5, 6], with some of them being nonorthogonal as, for instance, Bernstein's polynomials, mainly in the cases where boundary or initial conditions must be considered [7-9].

Some iterative methods, based on Krylov formulation, for instance, present the use of such bases and are implemented by using the Gram-Schmidt process [8, 10, 11] that, in most cases, is difficult to be operationalized.

Trying to simplify this procedure, an alternative operational method is presented with the first ideas developed in [12] that is described by using tensorial language and called coadjoint formalism [13], allowing the direct use of nonorthogonal bases without any kind of previous conditioning process.

In a nutshell, coadjoint formalism adapts Dirac's bracket notation [14] to spectral methods considering finite dimension complex vectorial spaces. The methodology is applied to nonorthogonal bases in finite dimension function spaces with a generalized tensorial approach [15-17] that simplifies the operational conditions.

In the next section, the theoretical fundamentals of the coadjoint formalism are presented, trying to connect it with the well-known Dirac bracket, followed by a section where two examples show how simple it is to apply the method developed here, with a conclusion section closing the work.

2. Coadjoint Formalism: Theoretical Foundations

This section presents the concepts and definitions used to build the coadjoint formalism. The bases to be considered are finite sets of complex functions of a real variable; that is, the bases elements {[[phi].sub.k]}, k = 1, ..., n < [infinity], are given by [[phi].sub.k]: R [right arrow] C, with [[phi].sub.k] [member of] H, where H is the function space, equipped as a Hilbert space.

2.1. Actuation Spaces. Here, it is considered that any operation regarding series expansion of a function occurs in two distinct spaces:

(i) A finite dimensional Hilbert space H.

(ii) The finite dimension space with dimension n, generated by the series expansion with n terms for the considered function, denoted by [O.sub.n] and called order space.

It is assumed that kets are represented by column vectors and vice versa. It is the same for bras, represented by line vectors, understood as covectors, that is, dual space elements. Consequently, an equivalence relation can be established [14]:

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (1)

The kets can belong either to the function space, |[>.sub.[infinity]] [member of] H or to the order space, [mathematical expression not reproducible]. The same is valid for bras.

Covariant and contravariant distinction are assumed [15], and the traditional notation of differential geometry and tensorial calculus is used:

(i) Contravariant components: [u.sup.i].

(ii) Covariant components: [u.sub.i].

Quantities described by kets are in the original space; quantities described by bras are in the dual space, in the traditional way of linear algebra [14]. Primitive space is related to the space where the quantity is defined; that is, if a bra defines a quantity, the dual space assumes the primitive space condition of the quantity.

Given a covariant basis composed of |[b.sub.i]> [member of] V, a vector u belonging to the order space, [O.sub.n](V), can be described by a ket in two different ways:

(i) Invariant representation: [mathematical expression not reproducible].

(ii) Coordinate representation: [mathematical expression not reproducible],

with [B] = {|[b.sub.i]>}. The spaces V where the spectral methods are generally applied are H, C and [C.sup.n].

Given a reference basis [[epsilon]] from [V.sup.n], for a basis composed of |[b.sub.i]> [member of] [V.sup.n] and described in terms of the basis [[epsilon]], where V can be either the Hilbert space H or any other complex vectorial space, two representations are possible:

(i) [|B].sub.[[epsilon]]] [member of] [M.sub.n](V) : [|B].sub.[[epsilon]]] [congruent] [[|[b.sub.1]>.sub.[[epsilon]]] ... [|[b.sub.n]>.sub.[[epsilon]]]].

(ii) [mathematical expression not reproducible],

with the inferior dot representing the covariant nature of the basis and [M.sub.n] represents the set of the n-order square matrices. In this kind of disposition, the bases are described by their coordinates in the reference basis [[epsilon]], but the reference basis can be omitted and the invariant representation is assumed.

Consequently, there are two isomorphic representations, given by

(i) |B] [member of] [M.sub.n](V) : |B] = [|[b.sub.1]> ... |[b.sub.n]>],

(ii) [mathematical expression not reproducible].

Given a vector |u> with its components expressed in a generical basis |[e.sub.i]>, the following operations are defined:

(i) Conjugation: [|u>.sup.*] = |[bar.u]>, [|[e.sub.i]>.sup.*] = |[bar.[e.sub.i]]>.

(ii) Transposition: |u>' = <[bar.u]|, |[e.sub.i]>' = <[bar.[e.sub.i]]|.

(iii) Adjunction: [|u>.sup.[dagger]] = |u>, [|[e.sub.i]>.sup.[dagger]] = <[e.sub.i]]|.

(iv) Duality: [|u>.sup.*] = <u|, [|[e.sub.i]>.sup.*] = <[e.sup.i]|.

2.2. Inner Products. The inner products (IP), <|> : [O.sub.n](V) x [O.sub.n](V) [right arrow] C, are defined in several different ways, depending on the space and the representation, as it is shown below.

Order Space

(1) Hermitian product is as follows:

(i) coordinate representation: [<u | v>.sub.[B]] = [[summation].sup.n.sub.i=1] [bar.[u].sup.i][v.sup.i].

(2) Dual product is as follows:

(i) coordinate representation: [<u | v>.sub.[B]] = [[summation].sup.n.sub.i=1] [bar.[u].sup.i][v.sup.i]

(ii) invariant representation: [mathematical expression not reproducible].

Functions Space. Considering the space of the functions with domain [a, b] [subset] R, the IP <|> : H x H [right arrow] C is defined as

[<f | g>.sub.[infinity]] = [[integral].sup.b.sub.a] [bar.f](x)g(x)dx. (2)

Hybrid Spaces. The mixed inner product <|> : [O.sup.*.sub.n](C) x [O.sub.n](H) [right arrow] C is defined as

<c | [phi]> = [n.summation over (r)] [c.sup.r] [|[[phi].sub.r]>.sub.[infinity]]. (3)

2.3. Duality Relations. It is possible to obtain the dual basis {|[e.sup.k]>} from an original basis {|[e.sub.i]>} by using the duality relations, given by

<[e.sup.k] | [e.sub.i]> = [[delta].sup.k.sub.i], <[e.sub.i] | [e.sup.k]> = [[delta].sub.i.sup.k]. (4)

It is possible to express the same vector in several ways, considering the formalism described here, considering four distinct bases. Here, these representations are called connected representations and are shown in Table 1.

Considering that the covariant representation in the original space is considered to be natural, the dot below the basis symbol can be omitted and the transformation relations between the bases are shown in Table 2.

The covariant and contravariant components are obtained by applying

(1) contravariant: [mathematical expression not reproducible],

(2) covariant: [mathematical expression not reproducible].

2.4. Series Expansions of Functions. Considering a basis {[|[[phi].sub.i]>.sub.[infinity]]} from [O.sub.n](H) and elements [[phi].sub.i] : R [right arrow] H, the infinite series expansion of a function f is given by

[|f>.sub.[infinity]] = [[infinity].summation over (r)] [c.sup.r][|[[phi].sup.r]>.sub.[infinity]]. (5)

with [c.sup.r] being the expansion coefficients in that basis. Considering the mixed inner product definition, this expression can be modified as

[|f>.sub.[infinity]] = <c | [[phi].sub.r]>, (6)

with the covector <c| [epsilon] [O.sup.*.sub.n](C) called coefficient covector.

In the subspace [O.sub.m](H), projectors can be defined by

[P.sub.m] = [m.summation over (r)] |[[phi].sub.r]> <[[phi].sup.r]|, [P.sup.[dagger].sub.m] = [m.summation over (r)] |[[phi].sub.r]> <[[phi].sup.r]|, (7)

with the second one called adjoint projector.

The eigenprojectors in the [O.sub.n](H) space are defined as the projectors in the n-dimensional proper space; that is, P = [P.sub.n] and [P.sup.[dagger]] = [P.sup.[dagger].sub.n].

In a way analogous to that followed in differential geometry, fundamental metric tensor of abasis, {[|[[phi].sub.i]>.sub.[infinity]]} from [O.sub.n](H), is defined as

[[gamma].sub.rs] = [<[[phi].sub.r] | [[phi].sub.s]>.sub.[infinity]], (8)

with its r eciprocal metric tensor given by

[[gamma].sup.rs] = [<[[phi].sup.r] | [[phi].sup.s]>.sub.[infinity]]. (9)

Consequently, the IPs between two functions f, g represented by series are given by

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (10)

with [mathematical expression not reproducible], respectively, representing the f and g expansion coefficients, in the basis {|[phi]>}.

The metric tensorial fundamental operator and its reciprocal are defined as

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (11)

2.5. Covariant-Contravariant Transformation Relations. Considering the covariant and contravariant matrix representations and defining B = {|[[phi].sub.k]>}, the transformation relations for bases and functions can be written as

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (12)

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (13)

[f.sub.r] = [n.summation over (k)][[gamma].sub.rk][f.sup.k], [|f>.sub.[B]] = [gamma][|f>.sub.[B]]; (14)

[f.sub.i] = [n.summation over (r)][[gamma].sup.ir][f.sub.r], [|f>.sub.[B]] = [[gamma].sup.*][|f>.sub.[B]]. (15)

Therefore,

[n.summation over (r)][[gamma].sup.ir][[gamma].sub.rk] = [[delta].sup.i.sub.k], [n.summation over (r)][[gamma].sub.kr][[gamma].sup.ri] = [[delta].sub.k.sup.i], (16)

meaning that the reciprocal tensor matrix is the inverse of the metrical tensor matrix. Calling the first one [[gamma].sup.*]:

[[gamma].sup.*] = [[gamma].sup.-1]. (17)

2.6. Finite Expansions. The n-order finite expansion of a function f can be expressed by the action of the reciprocal tensorial metric operator over the function; that is,

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (18)

Under these conditions, the coefficient covector <c| [member of] [O.sup.*.sub.n](C) can be expressed as

<c| [congruent] [[c.sup.1] ... [c.sup.n]]. (19)

Then, the expansion is given by the mixed [mathematical expression not reproducible] being the vector associated with the second representation chosen basis.

Equation (18) can be expressed by using matrices, giving a useful computational expression, in order to find the coefficient covector.

Considering the coefficient covector

[c.sup.r] = [n.summation over (s)][[integral].sup.b.sub.a] <[[phi].sub.s] ([xi])|f([xi])d[xi][[gamma].sup.sr'], (20)

it is possible to write

<c| = [[integral].sup.b.sub.a] <[phi]([xi])|f([xi])d[xi][[gamma].sup.*]]'. (21)

As a consequence, the expanded function becomes

[|[f.sub.n]>.sub.[infinity]] = [[integral].sup.b.sub.a] <[phi]([xi]) | f([xi])d[xi][[[gamma].sup.*]]'[|[phi]>.sub.[infinity]]. (22)

3. Application Examples

In this section, two examples are developed showing the expansion of functions using nonorthogonal bases, one using the canonical basis and the other using a basis of nonorthogonal complex functions.

3.1. Canonical Basis. Here, the more common case of nonorthogonality is developed, considering the canonical basis of functions defined in the real interval, defined by the polynomials:

[[epsilon].sub.m](x) = [x.sup.m-1], m = 1, 2, ..., n. (23)

The metric tensor can be calculated as

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (24)

Therefore, the analytical expression for the metric tensor elements in the domain [D.sub.1] can be calculated, resulting in

[[gamma].sub.rs] = [[2par(r + s)]/[r + s - 1]], 1 [less than or equal to] r, s [less than or equal to] n, (25)

with

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (26)

Following the calculations for n = 5, the metric matrix is given by

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (27)

allowing, by using expression (17), the calculation of the matrix representing its reciprocal tensor:

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (28)

By using the methodology developed in the former section and applying the transformation relation (13), the reciprocal basis is composed of polynomials that, for n = 5, are listed below:

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (29)

It is important to notice that, if the basis is orthogonal, to obtain its reciprocal is simply scale changing. Considering a nonorthogonal basis, the procedure is described here and changing order implies a whole recalculation of the basis elements.

In order to illustrate the ideas in a particular case, the expansion of the function g(x) = 2 cos 1 - 2[x.sup.2] cos x is considered.

The development for n = 5 gives

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (30)

According to (22), the matrix expression is

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (31)

or

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (32)

In these expressions, the coefficient covector is <c| = [[integral].up.1.sub.-1] [1 [xi] [[xi].sup.2] [[xi].sup.3] [[xi].sup.4]] g([xi])d[xi][[[gamma].sup.*]].sup.T], and, according to (21), can be calculated resulting in

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (33)

generating the expansion for the function

[g.sub.5](x) = 1.0789 - 1.9639[x.sup.2] + 0.89037[x.sup.4]. (34)

Figure 1(a) shows the almost perfect superposition of the function g(x) and its expansion [g.sub.5](x). Figure 1(b) shows the local error for the expansion.

3.2. Expansion in a Complex Nonorthogonal Basis. Here, considering a complex basis {[|[Q.sub.i]>.sub.[infinity]]}, composed of elements [Q.sub.i]: R [right arrow] H, i = 1, ..., n, the real function f(x) = exp(-2[pi][x.sup.2]) is expanded, showing efficient and concise results.

Defining the basis

[Q.sub.r](x) = r[x.sup.r-1] + i(1 - [[delta].sub.1r]) [x.sup.r-2], r = 1, ..., n, (35)

the metric tensor is expressed by

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (36)

For n = 5

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (37)

and, for the reciprocal metrics,

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (38)

Expanding the given function for n = 5,

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (39)

where [[mu].sup.k] = [[summation].sup.5.sub.r=1][[gamma].sup.kr] <[Q.sub.r] [|f>.sub.[infinity]] or

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (40)

with

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (41)

Considering [[gamma].sup.*][Q] formerly calculated, the expansion becomes

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (42)

Figure 2 shows the superposition of the function f(x) and its expansion [f.sub.5](x). It can be noticed that the five-term approximation is not good.

From the explicit expression (26), the metrical matrix for n = 10 can be determined:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (43)

with the reciprocal matrix given by

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (44)

Consequently, the ten-term expansion is given by

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (45)

where [[mu].sup.k] = [[summation].sup.10.sub.r=1][[gamma].sup.kr]<[Q.sub.r] [|f>.sub.[infinity]] or, in matrix form,

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (46)

with

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (47)

where [[gamma].sup.*][Q] is given by the new matrix Q or, analogously, calculating the coefficients by the equation

[[mu].sup.k] = [n.summation over (r=1)] [[integral].sup.1.sub.-1] [Q.sup.*.sub.r]([xi])f([xi])d[xi]([[gamma].sup.rk])'. (48)

Consequently, the new approximation is given by

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (49)

Figure 3(a) shows the almost perfect superposition of the function f(x) and the real part of its expansion [f.sub.10](x). Figure 3(b) shows the local rest for the expansion.

4. Conclusion

Considering that using nonorthogonal bases is being increased in spectral numerical methods requiring Gram-Schmidt procedures that are generally difficult from the operational point of view, this paper presents a simpler method for expanding functions, based on bracket formalism and called coadjoint method.

The mathematical ideas of the coadjoint method were presented and the examples have shown its practicability.

It can be added that coadjoint method is an efficient and concise tool for nonorthogonal bases with low computational costs. As it is not necessary to have orthogonal bases, more general function can be used in the numerical methods, increasing the quality of the whole process.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9718962

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] E. H. Doha, "On the construction of recurrence relations for the expansion and connection coefficients in series of Jacobi polynomials," Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 657-675, 2004.

[2] M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, USA, 10th edition, 1972.

[3] G. B. Arfken and H. J. Weber, Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A Comprehensive Guide, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 2011.

[4] O. Guimaraes, J. R. C. Piqueira, and M. L. Netto, "Direct computation of operational matrices for polynomial bases," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2010, Article ID 139198, 12 pages, 2010.

[5] E. H. Doha and A. H. Bhrawy, "Efficient spectral-Galerkin algorithms for direct solution of fourth-order differential equations using Jacobi polynomials," Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1224-1244, 2008.

[6] E. H. Doha, A. H. Bhrawy, and S. S. Ezz-Eldien, "A new Jacobi operational matrix: an application for solving fractional differential equations," Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 4931-4943, 2012.

[7] D. Baleanu, M. Alipour, and H. Jafari, "The Bernstein operational matrices for solving the fractional quadratic Riccati differential equations with the Riemann-Liouville derivative," Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 461970, 7 pages, 2013.

[8] E. H. Doha, A. H. Bhrawy, and M. A. Saker, "Integrals of Bernstien polynomials: an application for the solution of high even-order diferential equations," Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 53, pp. 1820-1823, 2011.

[9] A. K. Singh, V. K. Singh, and O. P. Singh, "The Bernstein operational matrix of integration," Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 49, pp. 2427-2436, 2009.

[10] P. N. Paraskevopoulos, P. Sklavounos, and G. Georgiou, "The operational matrix of integration for Bessel functions," Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 327, no. 2, pp. 329-341, 1990.

[11] P. N. Paraskevopoulos, P. D. Sparis, and S. G. Mouroutsos, "The Fourier series operational matrix of integration," International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 171-176, 1985.

[12] W. Labecca, O. Guimaraes, and J. R. Piqueira, "Dirac's formalism combined with complex Fourier operational matrices to solve initial and boundary value problems," Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2614-2623, 2014.

[13] W. Labecca, Matrizes operacionais e formalismo coadjunto em equates diferenciais fracionais [Ph.D. thesis], Escola Politecnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2015.

[14] V. Vedral, Introduction to Quantum Information Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2006.

[15] A. I. Borisenko and I. E. Tarapov, Vector and Tensor Analysis with Applications, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 1968.

[16] D. Lovelock and H. Rund, Tensors, Differential Forms and Variational Principles, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1975.

[17] E. Kreyszig, Introduction to Differential Geometry and Riemannian Geometry, University of Toronto Press, 1975.

William Labecca, Osvaldo Guimaraes, and Jose Roberto C. Piqueira

Escola Politecnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida Prof. Luciano Gualberto, Travessa 3, No. 158, 05508-900 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Correspondence should be addressed to Jose Roberto C. Piqueira; piqueira@lac.usp.br

Received 12 March 2016; Accepted 28 June 2016

Academic Editor: Gisele Mophou

Caption: Figure 1: Approximation of g(x).

Caption: Figure 2: Superposition of the graphics of f(x) and [f.sub.5](x).

Caption: Figure 3: Approximation of f(x).
Table 1: Connected representations.

Basis               Notation and correspondence

Original                 |B] [congruent] B
Adjoint             [B| [congruent] [B.sup.[dagger]]
Dual                 [B| [congruent] [B.sup.*]
Coadjoint   |B] [congruent] [([B.sup.*]).sup.[dagger]]

Basis              Invariant representations             Coordinate
                                                       representations

Original   [mathematical expression not reproducible]   [|u>.sub.[B]]
Adjoint    [mathematical expression not reproducible]   [<u|.sub.[B]]
Dual       [mathematical expression not reproducible]   [<u|.sub.[B]]
Coadjoint  [mathematical expression not reproducible]   [|u>.sub.[B]]

Table 2: Transformation relations between bases.

Basis        Notation               Transformation relation

Original        |B]                    |B [congruent] B
Adjoint         [B|         [B| [equivalent to] [|B].sup.[dagger]]
Dual          [[??]|          [[??]| [equivalent to] [|B].sup.-1]
Coadjoint     |[??]]     [[??] [equivalent to] [|[??]].sup.[dagger]]
                         |B] [congruent] [([B.sup.-1]).sup.[dagger])]
COPYRIGHT 2016 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Labecca, William; Guimaraes, Osvaldo; Piqueira, Jose Roberto C.
Publication:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Date:Jan 1, 2016
Words:3386
Previous Article:Three Revised Kalman Filtering Models for Short-Term Rail Transit Passenger Flow Prediction.
Next Article:A Novel Hybrid MCDM Procedure for Achieving Aspired Earned Value Project Performance.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |