Printer Friendly

Closing the biosensor gap.

Closing the biosensor gap

Biological and chemical sensors may one day find vital niches in nearly every aspect of our lives--from sniffing out methane gas leaks in homes and ensuring food freshness in the grocery store to keeping a tight rein on the delivery of therapeutic drugs and providing expeditious blood analyses in emergency rooms.

Today there is a rush of a activity, both in the United States and in Japan, to develop such biosensors. One of the aims of this research is to devise more sensitive marriages between biologically active substances and electronic materials--since a sensor must be able to translate minute changes in glucose level, pH or other biological signals into electronic signals that are strong enough to be read by a meter, computer or alarm.

Researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology have taken a big step down this road with a molecular-based transistor, which they describe in the Sept. 2 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY. "I don't see how to put [electrical] wires directly on a molecule,' says MIT's Mark S. Wrighton, "but we're getting close to that.'

Unlike silicon transistors, which use three metal contacts--one to the gate, which turns the device on and off, and the others to the source and the drain, between which the output current flows-- the molecular-based transistor consists of source and drain electrodes made of gold, spanned by a polymer that can become conductive when it interacts with the environment, which essentially acts as the gate.

The key to the new transistor, made by Wrighton, E. Tracy Turner Jones and Oliver M. Chyan, is its smallness. Using a technique from microelectronics fabrication called shadow deposition, the researchers have shrunk the distance between the source and drain from 1.5 microns in a previous version to 50 nanometers.

The smaller the source-drain gap, the lower is the electrical resistance of the material in the gap and the greater is the output current. At 50 nm spacing, says Wrighton, it becomes possible to bridge the electrodes with polymers that are biologically sensitive but that are very poor conductors.

The polymers Wrighton has in mind can be oxidized and reduced depending on environmental conditions such as pH. These particular "redox' materials are most conductive when half their molecules are reduced and the other half are oxidized. Any more or less oxidation turns the polymer into an insulator, shutting down the current and switching off the device.

The attractive property of these polymers is that they possess a very narrow band of oxidation states that will cause a current to flow. As a result, polymer transistors can, in principle, be designed to respond--with sensitivity and speed superior to that of other biosensor approaches --to specific chemicals or environmental changes while ignoring stronger oxidants and reductants. This enables the researchers to use biology as a starting point, to choose biologically interesting molecules and to make these into polymers that can be incorporated in their transistor.

"We've not demonstrated any of the sensor applications yet,' says Wrighton. "But we've done the basic science necessary to move in that direction.'

According to Larry R. Faulkner at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign, Wrighton's work is part of a larger drive among chemists to learn how to build molecular assemblies that are smaller than the several-thousand-angstrom regime of microelectronics and are larger than 20 angstroms--a size that encompasses most single molecules and that has been the traditional focus of chemists. "We know this can [be done] because biology is organized on this scale,' he says. And in biological systems, molecular arrays can perform all sorts of important tasks, from catalyzing reactions very efficiently to storing information.

Perhaps molecular-based devices will do similar things someday. Wrighton and Faulkner say they strongly doubt that these devices could ever compete with semiconductors in electronics applications. But for applications requiring the transfer of information between the electronic and biological worlds, such as artificial eyes or ears, says Faulkner, Wrighton's kind of work shows promise.
COPYRIGHT 1987 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1987, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:biological and chemical sensors
Author:Weisburd, Stefi
Publication:Science News
Date:Oct 3, 1987
Words:663
Previous Article:Nuclear reactor safety assailed in report.
Next Article:The slow road to ceramic engines.
Topics:


Related Articles
Biotrodes: food for thought.
Cell-like biosensor opens ionic floodgates.
Listening to the breaths of 1,000 cells.
Wiring enzymes to sense biochemicals.
Cells as sensors.
Use noncontact sensor to detect E. coli.
Piezoelectric biosensor detects seafood pathogen.
Novel Luminescent Biosensor.
Biosensors detect Salmonella.
Brainy bandages.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters