Printer Friendly

Clinicopathological and Survival Outcomes of Well-Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma Undergoing Dedifferentiation: A Retrospective Study from FUSCC.

1. Introduction

In the United States, thyroid cancer has become the fifth most common cancer expected to occur in women in 2017 [1]. Among women before the age of 30 years, thyroid cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in China [2]. Almost the entire change has been attributed to the rapid increase in incidence of well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC), which comprises the vast majority (>90%) of all thyroid cancers [1, 3, 4], including papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and follicular thyroid cancer (FTC). Though WDTCs usually have good prognoses, some can still develop into aggressive diseases. Recently, several studies have reported presence of poorly differentiated phenotypes in fatal WDTC cases [5-7].

Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies with a median survival of 5 months and near 100% mortality rate [8] while poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC) is associated with a 5-year survival rate of 40-70% [5, 9, 10]. ATC and PDTC represent a major clinical challenge because they are refractory to radioiodine therapy and insensitive to traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It has been generally accepted that ATC and PDTC usually develop from the dedifferentiation of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), which is supported by that histological concurrence of PDTC/ATC and DTC, and molecular inheritance from DTC to PDTC/ATC has been confirmed in various studies [11-16].

The clinicopathological features of WDTC patients undergoing dedifferentiation are poorly characterized. In the past decade, we have found a cohort of WDTC patients harboring PDTC/ATC at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC). Therefore, the present study aimed at investigating the clinicopathological and survival outcomes of WDTC undergoing dedifferentiation.

2. Methods

Each patient provided a written informed consent for his/her information to be used for research and stored in the hospital database. All the procedures performed in our study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the FUSCC research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

2.1. Patients. We retrospectively searched for the patients with histopathological diagnosis of WDTC harboring dedifferentiated components, who received surgeries or pathology consultation at FUSCC from January 2004 to December 2016. In the present study, dedifferentiated components were defined as presence of poorly differentiated follicular cell-derived carcinoma or anaplastic carcinoma. The patients included in our study met the following criteria: (1) histopathological confirmation of presence of WDTC, (2) harboring dedifferentiated components at primary site or metastatic sites, and (3) availability of adequate medical records and follow-up outcomes.

2.2. Histopathological Review. All hematoxylin and eosin slides of the selected patients were subjected to evaluation by expert pathologists. Tumor size was measured as the maximum dimension of the resected tumor specimen. Extrathyroidal extension (ETE) was divided into two categories: absence of ETE and presence of microscopic or gross ETE. The histological types of tumor were classified according to World Health Organization criteria (2004). PDTC was defined on the basis of the Turin proposal [17]: (1) presence of a solid/trabecular/insular pattern of growth, (2) absence of the conventional nuclear features of papillary carcinoma, and (3) presence of at least one of the following features: convoluted nuclei, mitotic activity > 3 x 10 HPF, and tumor necrosis. In the present study, WDTC undergoing dedifferentiation was defined as primary WDTC with dedifferentiated components at primary or metastatic sites.

2.3. Clinicopathological Data. Electronic records were reviewed to collect clinical and histopathological data. The data on clinicopathological features including age, gender, maximum size of tumor, ETE, lymph node metastasis (LNM), distant metastasis (DM), histological subtypes of WDTC and dedifferentiated components, dedifferentiated site, and adjuvant therapy were retrospectively abstracted from patients' records. The selected samples were subjected to repeated evaluation to confirm diagnoses of the above histological features. The patients were evaluated by several prognostic classification systems of thyroid cancer, including European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); age, grade, extent, size (AGES); age, metastases, extent, size (AMES); the metastases, age, completeness of resection, invasion, size (MACIS); and tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) stage (the 7th edition) as previously described [18, 19]. The 8th edition of TNM thyroid cancer staging system published by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) [20] was also added in our study to be compared with the above staging systems in a prognostic value. The CSS was defined as the time between the date of carcinoma diagnosis by operation and the date of death from cancer. The disease-free survival (DFS) was considered as the duration from the date of carcinoma diagnosis by operation to the date of disease recurrence or progression or death. Patients with no event were censored on the date of the last follow-up.

2.4. Statistical Analysis. The continuous data were expressed as the mean [+ or -] standard deviation (SD). Categorical results were summarized with frequencies and percentages. [chi square] and Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables to evaluate their correlations. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to construct CSS and DFS curves, and the univariate survival difference was determined by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine risk factors for mortality and disease progression using Cox proportional hazards models calculated by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Harrell index of concordance (C-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were calculated to compare the predictive value for prognosis among the several prognostic classification systems. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (version 22.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and the R software (version 3.2.5; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). GraphPad Prism (version 6.01; GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, Calif) was used to graph survival curves.

3. Results

3.1. Basic Characteristics of Dedifferentiated Patients. We retrospectively collected and analyzed the records of consecutive WDTC patients with dedifferentiated phenotype confirmed by histopathology who received surgeries or histopathology consultation at FUSCC. The flow graph of inclusion and analysis of study subjects in our study was shown in Figure 1. As shown in Table 1, a total of 63 patients (34 females and 29 males) with an average age of 53.0 [+ or -] 15.3 years (range: 15-85 years) were enrolled in our study. The median follow-up time was 52 months (range 8-156 months). Of the 63 WDTC patients, PTC and FTC accounted for 85.7% (54/63) and 14.3% (9/63), respectively. The dedifferentiated phenotype of PDTC was present in 50 patients (79.4%), and the ATC phenotype was observed in 13 patients (20.6%). Dedifferentiation occurred in primary tumor and lymph nodes as well as in distant metastatic sites. Table 1 summarizes the age, gender, tumor size, ETE, WDTC subtypes, dedifferentiated sites and components, TNM stage (the 8th edition), and adjuvant therapy of the patients in detail.

3.2. Survival Analyses of WDTC Cases Undergoing Dedifferentiation. The median CSS of patients was 138 months (range 2-156 months), with the CSS rate of 64.0% and 53.3% at 5 and 10 years, respectively (Figure 2(a)). As shown in Table 2, age (HR = 1.041, 95% CI: 1.009-1.076, P = 0.013), presence of the ATC phenotype (HR = 3.227, 95% CI: 1.308-7.961, P = 0.011, Figure 2(c)), and adjuvant therapy (HR= 3.035, 95% CI: 1.277-7.508, P = 0.016) were significantly correlated with decreased CSS in univariate Cox analysis. The further multivariate analysis adjusted by age, dedifferentiated site, dedifferentiated components, DM, and adjuvant therapy indicated that the presence of the ATC phenotype (HR = 3.732, 95% CI: 1.116-12.478, P = 0.033) and adjuvant therapy (HR = 2.715, 95% CI: 1.017-7.249, P = 0.046) were independent risk factors for the poor CSS.

The DFS curve of patients showed the DFS rate of 53.2% at 5 years in Figure 3(a). The univariate analysis showed that age (HR= 1.045, 95% CI: 1.016-1.076, P = 0.002, Figure 3(b)), dedifferentiation of metastatic site (HR = 2.746, 95% CI: 1.210-6.235, P = 0.016, Figure 3(c)), and DM (HR = 3.358, 95% CI: 1.517-7.432, P = 0.003, Figure 3(d)) significantly increased the risk of decreased DFS in Table 3. After adjustment of age, dedifferentiated site, and DM, age (Table 3, HR = 1.038, 95% CI: 1.007-1.070, P = 0.015) was identified as the only independent risk factor for disease progression.

3.3. Comparison of Different Prognostic Classification Systems in Dedifferentiated Cases. The analyses of evaluation for several prognostic systems including EORTC, AGES, AMES, MACIS, the 7th edition TNM, and the 8th edition TNM were performed to determine whether any of them had a better predictive effect of CSS in dedifferentiated patients. Table 4 showed the CSS rate of each group of the prognostic systems at 5 years and 10 years and C-index and AIC values for each system. The AGES demonstrated to be a better survival prediction system with 0.723 of C-index and 59.937 of AIC, followed by EORTC (C-index: 0.722, AIC: 69.338), the 8th edition TNM stage (C-index: 0.719, AIC: 60.816), the 7th edition TNM stage (C-index: 0.669, AIC: 68.113), and MACIS (C-index: 0.688, AIC: 68.954), and the AMES had the lowest prediction effect (C-index: 0.650, AIC: 71.915). Figure 4 showed the Kaplan-Meier curves of CSS according to the above prognostic systems.

3.4. Association of Dedifferentiated Features with Clinicopathological Factors. The further analysis of possible factors affecting dedifferentiation components indicated that age [greater than or equal to] 55 significantly correlated with the presence of the ATC phenotype (Table 5). Additionally, we found that five cases of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) (7.9%) presented dedifferentiation in the thyroid (2/5, 40.0%) and lymph node (3/5, 60.0%), of which 2 cases (40.0%) were observed to be fatal (Table 6).

4. Discussion

The present study revealed the dedifferentiation characteristics, the risk factors associated with CSS and DFS, and the optimal prognostic classification system for the 63 WDTC patients harboring dedifferentiated phenotype from FUSCC. The 63 patients were retrospectively selected from a large cohort of thyroid cancer patients at the department of head and neck surgery from FUSCC. To our knowledge, this is the first study that has reported the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of WDTC harboring dedifferentiated phenotype, which allows us to explain aggressive behaviors and fatal outcomes of some WDTCs in part from the perspective of histological phenotypes.

Consistent with the findings in the previous studies [5, 6, 13], our study confirms that dedifferentiation occurs in both primary tumor and metastatic regions in the histological forms of PDTC and ATC. Considering the significant correlations of age with ATC phenotype and metastatic tumor dedifferentiation, age demonstrates to be a risk factor for aggressive dedifferentiation in this study. And as a result, age is confirmed to be a risk factor for poor DFS in multivariate analysis and decreased CSS in univariate analysis in WDTC patients harboring dedifferentiated phenotype, which is supported by the fact that age is an independent prognostic factor for DTC [20]. The presence of ATC phenotype is an independent risk factor for poor CSS, suggesting that ATC phenotype plays a critical role in determining the patients' prognoses although there is no statistical significance (P = 0.137) in the analysis of association between the ATC phenotype and DFS, with the significant effect size (HR = 1.941). In addition, both dedifferentiation of metastatic sites and DM were risk factors for poor CSS and DFS in univariate analysis but could not be statistically significant in multivariate analysis. It is interesting to find that adjuvant therapy after surgery significantly correlates with decreased CSS, which may be explained by insensitivity and increased complications of therapy. Other clinicopathological factors including gender, tumor size, ETE, and histological subtypes of WDTC and LNM are not significantly associated with CSS and DFS in our study.

Due to the widespread use of high-resolution ultrasound and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, increasing numbers of PTMC patients are diagnosed [21]. Although PTMC usually presents an indolent course, some PTMC patients can still develop to fatal outcomes [7, 22]. In the present study, we found five PTMC cases with dedifferentiation, and 2 patients of them died of cancer disease, indicating that dedifferentiation could be a critical factor for malignant transformation of PTMC into aggressive clinical disease.

The prognostic value of different classification systems can be variable in different types of thyroid cancer [18, 20, 23]. Considering the difference between WDTC harboring dedifferentiated phenotype and DTC, we further analyzed the predictive value of several common classification systems to provide an optimal prognostic system for WDTC patients with dedifferentiated phenotype. As expected, the 8th edition TNM stage shows better predictive value than the 7th edition TNM stage. The AGES system demonstrates to be an optimal system in comparison with the 8th edition TNM stage, EORTC, AMES, and MACIS, which can attribute to the inclusion of histological grade score in the AGES system.

Due to the limited number of WDTC patients harboring dedifferentiated phenotype included in our study, the analyses of clinicopathological outcomes and survival can have statistical bias. Therefore, a large multicenter cohort with long follow-up will be necessary to demonstrate the above outcomes in the future study. Furthermore, the further investigation of molecular biology will be significant to get insights into the mechanism of dedifferentiation of WDTC.

5. Conclusions

The presence of dedifferentiated phenotypes can be responsible for the poor outcomes in WDTC patients. The AGES system demonstrates to be an optimal prognostic system for WDTC undergoing dedifferentiation.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2383715

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Authors' Contributions

Ben Ma, Weibo Xu, and Wenjun Wei contributed equally to the article.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (16411966700) and the National Science Foundation of China (81502317 to Wenjun Wei, 81472498 and 81772851 to Yulong Wang, and 81572622 to Qinghai Ji).

References

[1] R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, and A. Jemal, "Cancer statistics, 2017," CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 7-30, 2017.

[2] W. Chen, R. Zheng, P. D. Baade et al., "Cancer statistics in China, 2015," CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 115-132, 2016.

[3] B. R. Haugen, E. K. Alexander, K. C. Bible et al., "2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer," Thyroid, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-133, 2016.

[4] S. I. Sherma, "Thyroid carcinoma," The Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9356, pp. 501-511, 2003.

[5] D. Y. Lee, J. K. Won, S. H. Lee et al., "Changes of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes of anaplastic and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma," Thyroid, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 404-413, 2016.

[6] B. Xu, T. Ibrahimpasic, L. Wang et al., "Clinicopathologic features of fatal non-anaplastic follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinomas," Thyroid, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1588-1597, 2016.

[7] S. Piana, M. Ragazzi, G. Tallini et al., "Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma with fatal outcome: evidence of tumor progression in lymph node metastases: report of 3 cases, with morphological and molecular analysis," Human Pathology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 556-565, 2013.

[8] R. C. Smallridge and J. A. Copland, "Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: pathogenesis and emerging therapies," Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 486-497, 2010.

[9] T. Ibrahimpasic, R. Ghossein, D. L. Carlson et al., "Outcomes in patients with poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma," The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 1245-1252, 2014.

[10] T. Ibrahimpasic, R. Ghossein, D. L. Carlson et al., "Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma presenting with gross extrathyroidal extension: 1986-2009 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience," Thyroid, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 997-1002, 2013.

[11] E. R. Fisher, R. Gregorio, R. Shoemaker, B. Horvat, and C. Hubay, "The derivation of so-called "giant-cell" and "spindle-cell" undifferentiated thyroidal neoplasms," American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 680-689, 1974.

[12] E. Kawahara, A. Ooi, Y. Oda, S. Katsuda, S. Terahata, and T. Michigishi, "Papillary carcinoma of the thyroid gland with anaplastic transformation in the metastatic foci. An immunohistochemical study," Acta Pathologica Japonica, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 921-927, 1986.

[13] O. Fluge, O. Bruland, L. A. Akslen, J. R. Lillehaug, and J. E. Varhaug, "Gene expression in poorly differentiated papillary thyroid carcinomas," Thyroid, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 161-175, 2006.

[14] H. M. Wang, Y. W. Huang, J. S. Huang et al., "Anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid arising more often from follicular carcinoma than papillary carcinoma," Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 3011-3018, 2007.

[15] I. Landa, T. Ibrahimpasic, L. Boucai et al., "Genomic and transcriptomic hallmarks of poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancers," The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 1052-1066, 2016.

[16] B. Xu and R. Ghossein, "Genomic landscape of poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma," Endocrine Pathology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 205-212, 2016.

[17] M. Volante, P. Collini, Y. E. Nikiforov et al., "Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma: the Turin proposal for the use of uniform diagnostic criteria and an algorithmic diagnostic approach," The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1256-1264, 2007.

[18] A. Rios, J. M. Rodriguez, B. Ferri, E. Matinez-Barba, B. Febrero, and P. Parrilla, "Are prognostic scoring systems of value in patients with follicular thyroid carcinoma?," European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 169, no. 6, pp. 821-827, 2013.

[19] R. M. Wong, C. Bresee, and G. D. Braunstein, "Comparison with published systems of a new staging system for papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma," Thyroid, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 566-574, 2013.

[20] N. D. Perrier, J. D. Brierley, and R. M. Tuttle, "Differentiated and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual," CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 55-63, 2018.

[21] L. Gao, B. Ma, L. Zhou et al., "The impact of presence of Hashimoto's thyroiditis on diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in subcentimeter thyroid nodules: a retrospective study from FUSCC," Cancer Medicine, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1014-1022, 2017.

[22] M. Pusztaszeri, "Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma associated with metastasis and fatal outcome: is the microcarcinoma an incidental finding?," Human Pathology, vol. 44, no. 9, p. 1961, 2013.

[23] A. D'Avanzo, P. Ituarte, P. Treseler et al., "Prognostic scoring systems in patients with follicular thyroid cancer: a comparison of different staging systems in predicting the patient outcome," Thyroid, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 453-458, 2004.

Ben Ma, (1,2) Weibo Xu, (1,2) Wenjun Wei, (1,2) Duo Wen, (1,2) Zhongwu Lu, (1,2) Shuwen Yang, (1,2) Tongzhen Chen, (1,3) Yulong Wang [ID], (1,2) Yu Wang [ID], (1,2) and Qinghai Ji [ID] (1,2)

(1) Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

(2) Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

(3) Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yulong Wang; headneck@126.com, Yu Wang; neck130@sina.com, and Qinghai Ji; jiqinghai@shca.org.cn

Received 18 December 2017; Revised 26 February 2018; Accepted 1 March 2018; Published 21 May 2018

Academic Editor: Diego Russo

Caption: Figure 1: The flow graph of inclusion of WDTC patients harboring dedifferentiated phenotype in our study.

Caption: Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier plots of cause-specific survival. (a) The survival plot of all dedifferentiated patients. (b) The survival plot grouped by dedifferentiated sites indicated a significant difference between primary dedifferentiation in thyroid and metastatic region dedifferentiation (P = 0.04). (c, d) The survival plots are shown according to dedifferentiated components and distant metastasis (DM), respectively.

Caption: Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier plots of disease-free survival. (a) The survival plot of all dedifferentiated patients. (b-d) The survival plots are shown according to age, dedifferentiated sites, and distant metastasis (DM), respectively. The survival plot grouped by dedifferentiated sites indicated a significant difference between primary dedifferentiation in thyroid and metastatic region dedifferentiation (P = 0.011, c).

Caption: Figure 4: Kaplan-Meier curves of CSS for the prognostic classification systems. (a-f) The Kaplan-Meier curves of CSS according to the prognostic classification systems including EORTC, AGES, AMES, MACIS, the 7th edition TNM, and the 8th edition TNM.
Table 1: Summary of WDTC patients harboring dedifferentiated phenotype
in the FUSCC cohort.

Variables                     N          FUSCC (N = 63)            %

Age (years), mean [+ or -]         53.0 [+ or -] 15.3 (15-85)
SD (range)
Gender
  Male                        29                                 46.1%
  Female                      34                                 53.9%
Maximum size (cm), mean            3.39 [+ or -] 2.3 (0.3-8.6)
[+ or -] SD (range)
ETE
  Yes                         15                                 23.8%
  No                          48                                 76.2%
Histological subtypes of
WDTC
  PTC                         54                                 85.7%
    Classic PTC               46                                 73.0%
    Follicular PTC            2                                  3.2%
    Solid PTC                 1                                  1.6%
    PTMC                      5                                  7.9%
  FTC                         9                                  14.3%
Dedifferentiated site
  Thyroid                     40                                 63.5%
  Lymph node                  17                                 27.0%
  Distant site                1                                  1.6%
  Thyroid and lymph node      4                                  6.3%
  Thyroid and distant site    1                                  1.6%
Dedifferentiated components
  PDTC                        50                                 79.4%
  ATC                         13                                 20.6%
LNM
  N0                          22                                 34.9%
  N1                          41                                 65.1%
DM
  M0                          47                                 74.6%
  M1                          16                                 25.4%
TNM stage (the 8th edition)
  I/II                        41                                 65.1%
  III/IV                      22                                 34.9%
Adjuvant therapy
  Yes                         15                                 23.8%
    RAI                       8                                  12.7%
    Radiotherapy              3                                  4.8%
    Chemotherapy              1                                  1.6%
    Chemoradiotherapy         3                                  5.3%
  No                          48                                 76.2%

WDTC: well-differentiated thyroid cancer; FUSCC: Fudan University
Shanghai Cancer Center; SD: standard deviation; ETE: extrathyroidal
extension; PTC: papillary thyroid cancer; PTMC: papillary thyroid
microcarcinoma; FTC: follicular thyroid cancer; PDTC: poorly
differentiated thyroid cancer; ATC: anaplastic thyroid cancer; LNM:
lymph node metastasis; DM: distant metastasis; TNM: tumor-node-
metastasis; RAI: radioactive iodine.

Table 2: Risk factors for decreased cause-specific survival in WDTC
patients harboring dedifferentiated phenotype.

Variables                            Univariate analysis

                               P value    HR     95.0% CI for HR

Gender
  Female                                   1
  Male                          0.134    1.977     0.810-4.822
Age                            0.013#    1.041     1.009-1.076
Maximum size                    0.113    1.233     0.952-1.597
ETE
  No                                       1
  Yes                           0.396    0.620     0.205-1.870
Histological subtypes of WDTC
  FTC                                      1
  PTC                           0.251    2.352    0.545-10.144
Dedifferentiated site
  Thyroid                                  1
  Metastatic site               0.052    2.531     0.992-6.458
  Thyroid and metastatic site   0.052    3.805    0.991-14.609
Dedifferentiated components
  PDTC                                     1
  ATC                          0.011#    3.227     1.308-7.961
LNM
  No                                       1
  Yes                           0.322    1.669    0.606-4.4598
DM
  No                                       1
  Yes                           0.056    2.421     0.976-6.005
Adjuvant therapy
  No                                       1
  Yes                           0.016    3.035     1.277-7.508

Variables                         Multivariate analysis

                               P value    HR     95.0% CI for HR

Gender
  Female
  Male
Age                             0.488    1.014     0.974-1.056
Maximum size
ETE
  No
  Yes
Histological subtypes of WDTC
  FTC
  PTC
Dedifferentiated site
  Thyroid                                  1
  Metastatic site               0.337    1.656     0.592-4.633
  Thyroid and metastatic site   0.642    1.510     0.266-8.569
Dedifferentiated components
  PDTC                                     1
  ATC                          0.033#    3.732    1.116-12.478
LNM
  No
  Yes
DM
  No                                       1
  Yes                           0.367    1.707     0.534-5.463
Adjuvant therapy
  No                                       1
  Yes                          0.046#    2.715     1.017-7.249

Bold type indicates statistical significance. WDTC:
well-differentiated thyroid cancer; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence
interval; ETE: extrathyroidal extension; FTC: follicular thyroid
cancer; PTC: papillary thyroid cancer; PDTC: poorly differentiated
thyroid cancer; ATC: anaplastic thyroid cancer; LNM: lymph node
metastasis; DM: distant metastasis.

Note: Statistical significance are indicated with #.

Table 3: Risk factors for decreased disease-free survival in WDTC
patients harboring dedifferentiated phenotype.

Variables                            Univariate analysis

                                P value    HR     95.0% CI for HR

Gender
  Female                                    1
  Male                           0.145    1.805     0.816-3.992
Age                             0.002#    1.045     1.016-1.076
Maximum size                     0.351    1.105     0.896-1.364
ETE
  No                                        1
  Yes                            0.630    1.240     0.517-2.977
Histological subtypes of WDTC
  FTC                                       1
  PTC                            0.150    2.893    0.682-12.278
Dedifferentiated site
  Thyroid                                   1
  Metastatic site               0.016#    2.746     1.210-6.235
  Thyroid and metastatic site    0.250    2.437    0.534-11.109
Dedifferentiated components
  PDTC                                      1
  ATC                            0.137    1.941     0.809-4.658
LNM
  No                                        1
  Yes                            0.092    2.323     0.871-6.197
DM
  No                                        1
  Yes                           0.003#    3.358     1.517-7.432
Adjuvant therapy
  No                                        1
  Yes                            0.054    2.249     0.987-5.126

Variables                           Multivariate analysis

                                P value    HR     95.0% CI for HR

Gender
  Female
  Male
Age                             0.015#    1.038     1.007-1.070
Maximum size
ETE
  No
  Yes
Histological subtypes of WDTC
  FTC
  PTC
Dedifferentiated site
  Thyroid                                   1
  Metastatic site                0.559    1.312     0.528-3.259
  Thyroid and metastatic site    0.668    1.408     0.296-6.706
Dedifferentiated components
  PDTC
  ATC
LNM
  No
  Yes
DM
  No
  Yes                            0.128    1.914     0.829-4.417
Adjuvant therapy
  No
  Yes

Bold type indicates statistical significance. WDTC: well-
differentiated thyroid cancer; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence
interval; ETE: extrathyroidal extension; FTC: follicular thyroid
cancer; PTC: papillary thyroid cancer; PDTC: poorly differentiated
thyroid cancer; ATC: anaplastic thyroid cancer; LNM: lymph node
metastasis; DM: distant metastasis.

Note: Statistical significance are indicated with #.

Table 4: Comparison of prognostic classification systems in WDTC
patients harboring dedifferentiated phenotype.

Prognostic            Percentage of cause-     C-index    AIC
classification         specific survival
system
                  5 years (%)   10 years (%)

EORTC                                           0.722    69.338
  I-II               94.7           94.7
  III                71.6           71.6
  IV                 41.0           27.3
  V                  34.6           34.6
AGES                                            0.723    59.937
  Group 1            100.0         100.0
  Group 2            65.6           65.6
  Group 3            37.5           37.5
  Group 4            42.5           34.0
AMES                                            0.650    71.915
  Low risk           82.0           82.0
  High risk          43.5           34.8
MACIS                                           0.688    68.954
  I                  88.1           88.1
  II                 22.2           22.2
  III                60.0           60.0
  IV                 44.9           29.9
TNM stage (7th)                                 0.669    68.113
  I-II               95.8           95.8
  III                50.0           50.0
  IV                 45.9           36.7
TNM stage (8th)                                 0.719    60.816
  I                  95.2           95.2
  II                 37.5           37.5
  III                42.9           42.9
  IV                 44.9           29.9

WDTC: well-differentiated thyroid cancer; C-index: index of
concordance; AIC: Akaike information criterion; EORTC: European
Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; AGES: age, grade,
extent, size; AMES: age, metastases, extent, size; MACIS: metastases,
age, completeness of resection, invasion, size; TNM: tumor, lymph
node, metastasis.

Table 5: Clinicopathological factors associated with dedifferentiated
components.

Parameters                            Dedifferentiated      P value
                                         components

                                     PDTC         ATC

Gender                                                      0.013#
  Male                            19 (65.5%)   10 (34.5%)
  Female                          31 (91.2%)    3 (8.8%)
Age (years)                                                 0.009#
  <55                             28 (93.3%)    2 (6.7%)
  [greater than or equal to] 55   22 (66.7%)   11 (33.3%)
Tumor size (cm)                                              0.554
  [less than or equal to] 1       6 (85.7%)    1 (14.3%)
  >1                              44 (78.6%)   12 (21.4%)
ETE                                                          0.371
  No                              39 (81.3%)   9 (18.7%)
  Yes                             11 (73.3%)   4 (26.7%)
DTC subtypes                                                 0.472
  PTC                             41 (80.4%)   10 (19.6%)
  FTC                             9 (75.0%)    3 (25.0%)
Dedifferentiated site                                        0.536
  Thyroid                         33 (82.5%)   7 (17.5%)
  Metastatic site                 14 (77.8%)   4 (22.2%)
  Thyroid and metastatic site     3 (60.0%)    2 (40.0%)
LNM                                                          0.502
  N0                              17 (77.3%)   5 (22.7%)
  N1                              33 (80.5%)   8 (19.5%)
DM                                                           0.570
  M0                              37 (78.7%)   10 (21.3%)
  M1                              13 (81.3%)   3 (18.7%)
TNM stage (the 8th edition)                                  0.142
  I-II                            37 (84.1%)   7 (15.9%)
  III-IV                          13 (68.4%)   6 (31.6%)

Bold type indicates statistical significance. PDTC: poorly
differentiated thyroid cancer; ATC: anaplastic thyroid cancer; ETE:
extrathyroidal extension; PTC: papillary thyroid cancer; FTC:
follicular thyroid cancer; LNM: lymph node metastasis; DM: distant
metastasis; TNM: tumor-node-metastasis.

Note: Statistical significance are indicated with #.

Table 6: Clinicopathological characteristics of PTMC patients with
dedifferentiated phenotypes.

Number   Age   Gender   Dedifferentiated   Dedifferentiated   ETE
                              site            components

1        73    Female      Lymph node            PDTC         No
2        31    Female       Thyroid              PDTC         No
3        47    Female      Lymph node            PDTC         No
4        61    Female      Lymph node            ATC          No
5        41     Male        Thyroid              PDTC         No

Number   LNM   DM TNM    Cause-specific
                stage    survival status

1        Yes    No II          NA
2        No     No I          Alive
3        Yes   Lung II        Dead
4        Yes    No II         Dead
5        No     No I          Alive

PTMC: papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; ETE: extrathyroidal extension;
LNM: lymph node metastasis; DM: distant metastasis; TNM:
tumor-node-metastasis; PDTC: poorly differentiated thyroid cancer;
ATC: anaplastic thyroid cancer; NA: not available.
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Ma, Ben; Xu, Weibo; Wei, Wenjun; Wen, Duo; Lu, Zhongwu; Yang, Shuwen; Chen, Tongzhen; Wang, Yulong;
Publication:International Journal of Endocrinology
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:9CHIN
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Words:4775
Previous Article:The Potential Role of miRNAs as New Biomarkers for Osteoporosis.
Next Article:Direct Photocoagulation Guided by Merged Retinal Images for the Treatment of Focal Diabetic Macular Edema.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters