Clinical effects of pulmonary surfactant in combination with nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy on neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
Objective: To analyze the therapeutic effect of pulmonary surfactant (PS) in combination with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) therapy on neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS).
Methodology: Forty-nine neonates who were diagnosed as NRDS and admitted in our hospital from May 2014 to June 2015 were selected and divided into an observation group and a control group. The observation group was treated with PS and NCPAP. The control group was treated only with NCPAP. The clinical symptoms, pulmonary X-ray, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO ) and prognosis of the two groups were observed.
Results: Twelve hours after treatment, the partial pressure of carbon dioxide and oxygenation index decreased significantly (P<0.05), and PaO and ratio of arterial/pulmonary oxygen partial pressures increased significantly (P<0.05). Pulmonary X-ray examination showed that 78.3% of the observation group and 53.8% of the control group were relieved 12-24 hour after treatment, between which the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The improvement rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (82.6% vs. 57.7%, P<0.05), the incidence of complications was significantly lower in the observation group (P<0.05), and the average length of stay in the observation group was significantly shorter (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Both methods effectively treated NRDS, but PS in combination with NCPAP better improved oxygenation, reduced mortality and incidence of complications.
KEY WORDS: Neonate, Pulmonary surfactant, Respiratory distress syndrome.
Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), also known as neonatal hyaline membrane disease, mainly threatens premature neonates with the gestational ages of 0.05).
Methods: The two groups NCPAP therapy after admission, with the oxygen concentration of 21%-80%, the gas flow of 6-8 L/min and the pressure of 4-7 cmH2O. Meanwhile, they were given warm keeping, nutritional support, infection prevention, fluid infusion, respiration-strengthening management and symptomatic treatment. The therapy was terminated when CPAP reduced to 2-3 cmH2O, the oxygen concentration reduced to 25%, and dyspnea was significantly alleviated or disappeared. If the oxygen concentration was >80%, pressure >6-7 cmH2O, and the oxygen saturation was still <85% after 6-8 hour of treatment, or type II respiratory failure appeared, the therapy was replaced with mechanical ventilation. For the observation group, exogenous PS (Calsurf, Beijing Double-Crane Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., H20052128) was injected intratracheally as early as possible on the basis of the above-mentioned treatment.
Administration methods: The neonates were administered with an improved method as early as possible. During traditional administration, the neonate was in the supine position. The trachea was catheterized and ventilated by a balloon. Then a small suction catheter was placed in the trachea catheter, through which drug was injected in 2-3 portions. Ventilation for oxygen supply was stopped in each injection. As to the improved method, sterilization was performed at 3-5 cm of the catheter outside the lips after tracheal intubation. Afterwards, the sterilized site was directly pierced with a No. 4-5 disposable scalp needle pierced in a degree of 30-40deg, which was inserted 1-2 cm further along the horizontal direction of the catheter. Then drug (70-100 mg/kg each time) was slowly pushed using a syringe connected with the scalp needle and injected evenly.
After injection, ventilation using balloon was continued for 3-5 minutes and then the catheter was removed to continue NCPAP therapy, during which ventilation for oxygen supply was not interrupted. Attention should be paid to the observation of vital signs during administration, and aspiration of sputum was forbidden within 6 hour under non-emergency conditions. Observation indices: The improvement of dyspnea and incidence of complications were observed before and after using PS respectively. The improvement rate, rate of changing into mechanical ventilation, as well as hospitalization time and cost of the two groups were compared.
In addition, pulmonary X-ray, arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), oxyhemoglobin saturation, carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2), oxygenation index (OI), and ratio of arterial/pulmonary oxygen partial pressures (a/AO2) were also compared. Statistical analysis: All data were analyzed by SPSS 17.0. The categorical data were expressed as ( +-s). Inter-group means were compared by the t test. The numerical data were compared by the kh2 test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Table-I: Main indices before and after treatment (X+-s).
###PaO2 (mmHg)###PaCO2 (mmHg)###a/AO2###OI
###Observation###Control###Observation Control###Observation###Control Observation Control
Before###44.83+-5.26###45.38+-5.8###59.35+-6.96 58.12+-7.69 0.19+-0.13###0.18+-0.12 13.7+-2.8###14.0+-3.1
12 h after###80.75+-11.73 75.69+-10.85 49.32+-6.35 49.96+-7.20 0.68+-0.17###0.37+-0.17###6.9+-1.9###9.8+-3.0
P###<0.01###<0.01###<0.01###<0.01###<0.01###<0.01###<0.01###0.05). After 12 hour of treatment, PaCO2 and OI significantly decreased, while PaO2 and a/AO2 significantly increased compared with those before treatment (P<0.01). Besides, a/AO2 values of the two groups were also significantly different after treatment (t=5.63, P<0.01) (Table-I). Clinical data before and after treatment: The clinical outcomes are listed in Table-II. The observation group had significantly higher improvement rate (P<0.05) and significantly lower incidence of complications (P0.05).
Hospitalization time and cost of living neonates: The observation group had significantly shorter hospitalization time than that of the control group (P0.05) (Table-III).
Pulmonary X-ray results 12-24 h after treatment: As suggested by pulmonary X-ray examination 12-24 h after treatment, 78.3% of the observation group (18/23) was relieved, whereas only 53.8% of the control group (14/26) was alleviated, with a statistically significant difference (kh2=4.59, P<0.05) (Fig.1 and Fig. 2).
Table-II: Clinical outcomes.
Group###n###Improvement rate###Incidence of complications###Rate of changing into mechanical ventilation
Observation###23###19 (82.6)###9 (39.1)###3 (14.3)
Control###26###15 (57.7)###18 (69.2)###5 (19.2)
NRD, a common severe disease in the neonatal period, is one of the important causes for premature death. The survivors are prone to suffering from chronic pulmonary diseases, seriously affecting their quality of life.1 As the treatment methods and technology continues to develop, the therapeutic effects on NRDS have been greatly improved. Oxygen therapy is one of the important measures to treat NRDS successfully.
NCPAP is a noninvasive ventilation method developed since the 1970s. It can stabilize chest wall activity and alleviate pleural dyssynergia in premature neonates, which has been widely used in the early treatment of NRDS.10,11 In addition, NCPAP provides controllable oxygen concentration and airway pressure, which can reduce the incidence of chronic pulmonary diseases and mechanical ventilation.12,13 In this study, PaCO and OI were decreased significantly, and PaO2 and a/AO2 were increased significantly 12 hour after treatment, which had significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05).
Dargaville et al. reported that Calsurf treatment of NRDS, which was safe and effective, could improve oxygenation and ventilation, and both the results of chest X-ray film and a/AO2 were significantly improved 8-24 hour after administration.14 a/ AO2, which can be used as an indicator for RDS diagnosis and treatment, can reflect the anoxic status under oxygen uptake conditions, the ventilation function and the pulmonary vascular bed and alveolar damage, which is associated with good pulmonary blood flow but has no correlation with extrapulmonary organ failure.15,16 In this study, there were significant differences in OI and a/AO2 between the two groups 12 hour after treatment (P<0.01), and the difference of a/AO2 also had statistical significance (P<0.01). The difference in the review of chest X-ray film was significant between the two groups 12-24 hour after treatment (P<0.05).
The improvement rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05), the incidence of complications was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05), and the average length of stay in the observation group was significantly less than the control group (P0.05). PS combined with NCPAP in the NRDS treatment not only improved the oxygenation and ventilation in NRDS neonates in a quick and effective way, but also prevented the progression of pulmonary diseases, reduced complications, shortened hospital stay, reduced NRDS mortality and improved premature prognosis and quality of life, without significantly increasing the costs of treatment. Therefore, PS combined NCPAP can be used as a priority treatment of NRDS.17
In this study, the observation group which used PS stressed administration as early as possible, and adopted the improved method of administration. Zhao et al. reported18 that the therapeutic effect of early administration (12 hours or less) was better than that of administration 12 hours later, and the treatment had a better effect if PS was given within six hour. As neonates suffer from respiratory distress, some protein substances may be released from alveoli, which can inhibit the activity of PS,19,20 affecting the therapeutic effect.
In the traditional method of administration, drug was injected through the small catheter placed in the tracheal catheter, causing the separation of the resuscitator from the tracheal catheter. As a result, drug may be easily ejected during administration, resulting in drug waste and affecting the efficacy. Meanwhile, oxygen supply may be interrupted during operation. Hence, spO2 decline in neonates may aggravate the disease. In contrast, the improved method of administration is a closed operation process, which allows drug to be injected slowly and evenly, without waste or oxygen supply interruption. This strategy is thus worthy of clinical application.
Source of funding: None.
Declaration of interest: None.
1. Polin RA. Workbook in practical neonatology. 1993;5767-5771.
2. Wheeler KI, Abdel-Latif ME, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, Dargaville P. Surfactant therapy via brief tracheal catheterization in preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011672.
3. Logan JW, Moya FR. Animal-derived surfactants for the treatment and prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: summary of clinical trials. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009;5(1):251-260. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S4029.
4. Hu YH, Jiang L. Study on early application of pulmonary surfactant combined with assisted ventilation in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Modern J Integr Tradit Chin West Med. 2014;23(14):1500-1503.
5. Weaver TE, Nogee LM, Jobe AH. Surfactant During Lung Development. In: Fetal and Neonatal Lung Development, 2016, Chapter 8. Cambridge University Press.
6. Manilal-Reddy PI, Al-Jumaily AM. Understanding the use of continuous oscillating positive airway pressure (bubble CPAP) to treat neonatal respiratory disease: an engineering approach. J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33(3):214-222. doi: 10.1080/03091900601164838.
7. Lemyre B, Laughon M, Bose C, Davis PG. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub2.
8. Soll R, Ozek E. Multiple versus single doses of exogenous surfactant for the prevention or treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD000141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000141.pub2.
9. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Plavka R, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants--2013 update. Neonatology. 2013;103(4):353-368. doi:10.1159/000349928.
10. Huang DM, Chen J, Lu QQ. Clinical study on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) combined with pulmonary surfactant in treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Exp Med. 2008;7(8):25-26.
11. Niknafs P, Faghani A, Afjeh SA, Moradinazer M, Bahman-Bijari B. Management of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome Employing ACoRN Respiratory Sequence Protocol versus Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Protocol. Iran J Pediatr. 2014;24(1):57-63.
12. Wu J, Li Y, Luo KL, Zhang ZR, Li YL. Pulmonary surfactant and nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Modern J Integr Tradit Chin West Med. 2014;23(2):140-142.
13. Buzzella B, Claure N, D'Ugard C, Bancalari E. A randomized controlled trial of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels after extubation in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2014;164(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.08.040.
14. Dargaville PA, Kamlin CO, De Paoli AG, Carlin JB, Orsini F, Soll RF, et al. The OPTIMIST-A trial: evaluation of minimally-invasive surfactant therapy in preterm infants 25-28 weeks gestation. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:213. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-213.
15. Davidson WJ, Dorscheid D, Spragg R, Schulzer M, Mak E, Ayas NT. Exogenous pulmonary surfactant for the treatment of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: results of a meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R41. doi: 10.1186/cc4851.
16. Wu R, Li SB, Tian ZF, Li N, Zheng GF, Zhao YX, et al. Lung recruitment maneuver during proportional assist ventilation of preterm infants with acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Perinatol. 2014;34(7):524-527. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.53.
17. Tonelli AR, Zein J, Adams J, Ioannidis JP. Effects of interventions on survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome: an umbrella review of 159 published randomized trials and 29 meta-analyses. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(6):769-787. doi: 10.1007/ s00134-014-3272-1.
18. Zhao J, Wang Z, Mashayekhi H, Mayer P, Chefetz B, Xing B. Pulmonary surfactant suppressed phenanthrene adsorption on carbon nanotubes through solubilization and competition as examined by passive dosing technique. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(10):5369-5377. doi: 10.1021/es2044773.
19. Liu Y, Li L, Liang WY, Nie CX. Comparisons of efficacy of different pulmonary surfactants for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2012;14(4):253-255.
20. Whitsett JA, Wert SE, Weaver TE. Diseases of pulmonary surfactant homeostasis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2015;10:371-393. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012513-104644.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences|
|Date:||Jun 30, 2017|
|Previous Article:||Prevention of anesthesia-induced injection pain of propofol in pediatric anesthesia.|
|Next Article:||A study of Galactin-3 on fine needle aspiration as a diagnostic marker differentiating benign from malignant thyroid neoplasm.|