Printer Friendly

Clinical course and long-term outcome of hantavirus-associated nephropathia epidemica, Germany.

Hantaviruses, enveloped RNA viruses of the family Bunyaviridae, are transmitted to humans by rodents, the natural reservoir of these viruses (1). In North America, hantavirus infection can lead to hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome and to case-fatality rates of up to 35% (2,3), and in Asia and Europe, infection can lead to hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) (4).

In Germany, the incidence of HFRS increased from 0.09 cases/100,000 persons in 2001 to 2.47 cases/100,000 persons in 2010 (5). During October 2011-April 2012, a total of 852 HFRS cases were reported in Germany, of which 580 (68%) originated in the southern federal state of Baden-Wurttemberg (6). Puumala virus (PUUV), by far the most frequent cause of hantavirus disease in Germany (7), causes a milder form of HFRS (8) called nephropathia epidemica (NE). Hantavirus infections are one of the 5 most common notifiable viral diseases in Germany, along with norovirus infections, hepatitis C, influenza, and rotavirus infections (7).

NE is characterized by acute kidney injury associated with thrombocytopenia and, frequently, with proteinuria (9). Severe and often prolonged gastrointestinal symptoms and severe back and abdominal pain also occur (10). The severity of infection with PUUV varies from subclinical disease to severe acute kidney injury, including a fatal outcome (11,12). Renal replacement therapy is required in [approximately equal to] 5% of hospitalized patients with acute NE (8,10,13,14), although some studies report rates of up to 25% (15,16).

Despite the high and increasing incidence of hantavirus infection, long-term follow-up data have not been reported for a large, representative cohort of patients. Moreover, it remains unclear whether NE has long-term consequences, such as hypertension, proteinuria (17), and alteration of kidney function (18,19). Two previous studies that followed up 36 Finnish patients 5 and 10 years after they experienced PUUV-associated NE, reported that the patients had increased urinary protein excretion, glomerular hyperfiltration, and elevated blood pressure at a 5-year but not a 10-year follow-up (18,19). Other reports support an association between previous hantavirus infection and subsequent hypertension (20-23).

Data on humoral immunity years after PUUV infection are not available for a representative cohort of German patients. Thus, we conducted this study in such a cohort to describe the detailed clinical phenotype of patients with clinical manifestations of PUUV infection and their long-term outcomes and humoral immunity to PUUV.

Patients and Methods

Patients

Since 2001, Germany's Protection against Infection Act (http://www.rki.de/EN/Content/Prevention/Inf_Dis_ Surveillance/inf_dis_down.pdf?_blob=publicationFile, section 7) has required that confirmed cases of hantavirus infection be reported (on a named-patient basis) to local health authorities. In turn, the health authorities report HFRS cases to the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin, Germany, the central federal institution responsible for disease control and prevention.

During 2001-2012, a total of 7,476 serologically and clinically confirmed hantavirus cases were reported to the Robert Koch Institute (SurvStat, https://www.survstat.rki. de/) (24). In cooperation with 4 local health authorities in southern Germany (Stuttgart, Boeblingen/Sindelfingen, Esslingen, Reutlingen), we identified 1,570 (21%) of 7,476 persons who had received a clinically and serologically confirmed diagnosis of hantavirus-associated NE during 2001-2012. During September 2012-April 2013, we contacted these persons by mail, asking them to come for a follow-up examination at the outpatient clinic of Robert-Bosch-Hospital (Stuttgart). All patients gave written consent before participating in the study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ethics Commission of the State Chamber of Medicine in Baden-Wuerttemberg (Stuttgart) (approval no. F-2012-046). Studies were conducted in concordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data Acquisition

Acute Course of NE

Data on clinical and laboratory findings at the time of diagnosis and during the acute course of the disease were obtained from medical reports and files for each patient. Details of data acquisition are shown in the online Technical Appendix (http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/EID/article/20/1/140861-Techapp1.pdf).

Follow-up

All patients (i.e., those treated as inpatients and those treated as outpatients) were included in the follow-up. Patients participated in a follow-up session once at the Robert-Bosch-Hospital outpatient clinic. Detailed past and current medical histories were obtained by using standardized case report forms, and a physical examination was conducted. The case report form, which was designed after a systematic review of the literature, included 56 questions divided into 3 sections: demographic data, time of diagnosis and acute course of the disease, and follow-up. Blood pressure for all patients was measured as recommended by the American Heart Association (25); results were classified as normotensive, prehypertension, hypertension stage 1, or hypertension stage 2, according to the classification of blood pressure for adults as described in the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (26) (online Technical Appendix).

At the follow-up appointment, standard procedures were used by the Robert-Bosch-Hospital laboratory to determine complete blood counts and levels of plasma C-reactive protein, serum creatinine, urea, and second-morning urine and to perform liver function tests and blood gas analysis. Proteinuria was defined as microalbuminuria (>30 mg albumin/24 h) in urine. In addition, serum samples from all patients were analyzed for PUUV-specific IgM and IgG by using a strip-immunoassay (recomLine Bunyavirus IgG/ IgM, Mikrogen, Neuried, Germany).

Statistical Analysis

Laboratory findings were tabulated as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). Clinical symptoms were enumerated by percentage of affected patients.

Results

Clinical Findings and Course of Acute NE

During September 2012-April 2013, we contacted (by mail) 1,570 persons in Baden-Wurttemberg State, Germany, for possible inclusion in this study; all of these persons had received a diagnosis of serologically confirmed NE during 2001-2012. Of the 1,570 persons, 456 (29%) were included in the study, representing 6.1% of ever-reported cases of hantavirus infection in Germany. Reasons for exclusion included failure to respond to the request (1,104 patients), being <18 years of age at the time of diagnosis (3 patients), and missed follow-up appointment (10 patients) (online Technical Appendix).

Median age at diagnosis was 48 years (IQR 40-59). Of the 456 patients, 290 (64%) were male and 166 (36%) were female; the higher number of cases in men corresponds to the characteristics of the overall reported cases in Germany during 2001-2013 (Survstat, https://www.survstat.rki.de/). Of the 456 patients, 335 had received inpatient treatment, and 121 had received outpatient treatment by general practitioners or nephrologists. Time from onset of symptoms to admission to hospital or first contact with a general practitioner/nephrologist was 5 days (range 3-7). Prominent clinical findings were fever (90%), back pain (67%), limb pain (71%), and nausea and/or vomiting (47%). Baseline characteristics of the study population during the acute course of the disease are summarized in Table 1. At hospital admission/first visit to the general practitioner/nephrologist, 70% of the patients exhibited acute kidney injury, as determined by RIFLE (risk of renal dysfunction) criteria (27). Thrombocytopenia was present in 61% of patients at hospital admission/first visit with a general practitioner/ nephrologist. Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count [less than or equal to] 60 x [10.sup.9]/L) was found in 49 patients (11%), none of whom required platelet transfusion. Mild hemorrhagic symptoms, mostly epistaxis, occurred in 7% of the patients; no patients had severe bleeding complications. Lymphocytopenia was found in 55% of patients, monocytosis was observed in 59% at hospital admission/first visit to the general practitioner/nephrologist and C-reactive protein levels were substantially elevated in 96% of patients. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2.

Follow-up

Baseline characteristics of the study population at the follow-up examination are summarized in Table 3. The median time between diagnosis with acute disease and follow-up was 17 months (IQR 7-35). Fifty per cent of patients had NE >2 years before the follow-up visit, and 20% had NE >5 years before the follow-up visit. All but 2 patients had serum creatinine levels within the reference range at follow-up. One of these 2 patients had hypertension and coronary disease before onset of NE; the second patient received a diagnosis of glomerulonephritis 3 months after the onset of NE. Thrombocytopenia was still present in 4% of the patients at follow-up. Proteinuria was present in 34 patients (7%). None of the patients had symptoms of urinary tract infection at follow-up. Urinanalysis showed a high proportion of patients with hematuria (26%). We compared baseline characteristics (e.g., laboratory values, severity of acute kidney injury, symptoms during acute course of the disease) and findings (e.g., kidney function, blood pressure, and protein levels in urine) from the acute course of the disease for patients with and those without hematuria at follow-up: no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups (data not shown).

Blood pressure was measured twice for all patients in the outpatient clinic. In this setting, 203 (45%) of the 456 patients had hypertension stage 1 or 2, according to the classification of blood pressure for adults (26). All of these patients were contacted again within 8 weeks after the appointment in the outpatient clinic to reevaluate blood pressure measurements in the ambulatory setting. On the basis of these data, hypertension was present in 23% of all patients at follow-up. One third of these hypertensive patients had documented preexisting hypertension. In patients with preexisting hypertension, there was no change in blood pressure after NE, and antihypertensive therapy was not increased to achieve pre-NE blood pressure values.

Serum samples from all patients were analyzed for hantavirus-specific IgM and IgG at follow-up. All patients had detectable IgG, and 8.5% had persistent IgM.

Discussion

The data from our study show that NE is responsible for severe acute kidney injury in a high proportion of patients with PUUV infection. Proteinuria and hematuria were frequently present during the acute course of NE. In contrast to findings in previously published small studies (18,19), our findings show that proteinuria and hypertension are not long-term sequelae of the disease. Of note, hematuria was present during the acute course of disease and at long-term follow-up (median 17 mo [IQR 7-35 mo]). Furthermore, our data show that neutralizing antibodies are still present up to years after infection, and no recurrent disease was reported. During the acute course of PUUV infection, the disease causes acute kidney injury in 86% of patients. In our study, only 3% of the patients required transient renal replacement therapy; this percentage is lower than that reported in previous smaller studies (8,10,13-16). Compared with previous studies, our study used well-defined, consistent classification criteria to describe the clinical course of patients with NE (10,28,29). Apart from acute kidney injury, NE is clinically characterized by thrombocytopenia and, frequently, proteinuria (8,9,30,31). Thrombocytopenia was present in 219 61% of the patients in our study, and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count [less than or equal to] 60 x [10.sup.9]/L) was found in 49 (11%) patients. Of interest, none of the patients required platelet transfusion, and only mild hemorrhagic symptoms, mostly epistaxis, occurred in a small percentage (7%) of all patients, and the hemorrhagic symptoms occurred independently of thrombocyte counts. Previous smaller studies reported higher rates of bleeding complications in patients with NE (32,33). At hospital admission, the thrombocyte nadir had been reached in 90% of the patients; this finding supports the hypothesis that thrombocytopenia occurs in early stages of the disease. Furthermore, visual disorders were present in 22% of our study population; the disorders, caused by a swelling of the lens, are often one of the first symptoms of NE (34). Therefore, NE should be considered in patients with acute onset of blurred vision and fever, especially in areas where the disease is endemic.

Reports on the long-term outcome of NE in large cohorts of patients are lacking. Hypertension has been discussed as a long-term consequence of NE (17), and 2 previous follow-up studies of 36 patients in Finland (5 and 10 years after infection) reported that patients exhibited increased urinary protein excretion, glomerular hyperfiltration, and elevated blood pressure at the 5- but not the 10-year follow-up (18,19). Some reports have suggested an association between previous hantavirus infection and subsequent hypertension (20-23). In our study population, 23% of patients had hypertension at follow-up. It is noteworthy, however, that these patients were older (45-63 years of age) than the patients without hypertension. Furthermore, the incidence of high blood pressure in patients in our study was not different than that in an age-matched cohort of patients without a history of NE (35). In contrast to findings in previous studies (20-23), we did not find that hypertension was a frequent sequela of NE in our study population. Persistent proteinuria following NE is a currently unresolved but frequently discussed issue. In our study, only 30 patients exhibited proteinuria at follow-up, and19 (57%) of these patients had received a diagnosis of hypertension before the development of NE, suggesting that proteinuria does not seem to be long-term consequence of NE. At follow-up, a large proportion of patients had excess traces of blood in the urine (i.e., microscopic hematuria). Whether persistent hematuria after NE reflects lasting damage to glomerular cells, as a long-term consequence, remains uncertain because of the lack of renal biopsy specimens at long-term follow-up.

Representative data on humoral immune responses to PUUV in a large cohort of patients are lacking (3d). Hantavirus-specific IgM and IgG were detected at initial diagnosis and during follow-up. All patients had hantavirus-specific IgG antibodies at follow-up, suggesting that neutralizing antibodies are still present up to years after infection.

Our study design had several limitations. First, only one third of NE cases occur with typical clinical signs and symptoms, which results in high underreporting, especially of younger patients with mild disease. Second, patients were contacted by mail and asked to attend the outpatient clinic for follow-up investigations, which may have led to a selection bias because more patients with a severe course of disease might have been included in the study. Third, we did a retrospective study of medical case reports for the patients during acute NE, associated with all known limitations. Previously published Finnish long-term outcome studies of patients with NE (18,19) investigated small cohorts of patients, but they provided accurate glomerular filtration rate measurements and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements and compared their results with those of a control group. Because of the large number of patients in our study and the wide geographic area in which they resided, we could not obtain 24-hour blood pressure monitoring; thus, we focused on blood pressure measurements obtained in the outpatient clinic at follow-up and on interviews with patients who had elevated blood pressure at that time. Therefore, establishment of a matched control group was not possible. The last possible limitation is that serum samples from PUUV-infected patients cross-react strongly with Sin Nombre virus and weakly with Hantaan virus, Seoul virus, and Dobrava virus (36,37). Although Dobrava-Belgrade virus and Tula virus circulate in rodent hosts in Germany and might cause an infection in humans (38-40), almost all hantavirus infections (especially in southern Germany) are caused by PUUV (5,7). This fact minimizes the risk for inclusion in our study of patients with HFRS caused by a hantavirus other than PUUV.

In summary, PUUV-associated NE is responsible for acute kidney injury in a high percentage of patients. Hypertension and proteinuria do not seem to be long-term consequences of NE, but hematuria may be, and patients should therefore be monitored after PUUV infection. The presence of hantavirus-specific IgG in patients after PUUV infection suggests that neutralizing antibodies can be present as long as years after infection.

ACTIVITY

Medscape, LLC is pleased to provide online continuing medical education (CME) for this journal article, allowing clinicians the opportunity to earn CME credit.

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint providership of Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)[TM]. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 75% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at http://www.medscape.org/journal/eid; (4) view/print certificate.

Release date: December 16, 2014; Expiration date: December 16, 2015

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

* Describe clinical characteristics of acute nephropathia epidemica associated with Puumala virus hantavirus infection, based on a cross-sectional prospective survey.

* Distinguish long-term sequelae of acute nephropathia epidemica associated with Puumala virus hantavirus infection.

* Discuss serologic findings of nephropathia epidemica associated with Puumala virus hantavirus infection.

CME Editor

Claudia Chesley, Technical Writer/Editor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Claudia Chesley has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

Laurie Barclay, MD, freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC. Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Authors

Disclosures: Joerg Latus, MD; Matthias Schwab, MD; Evelina Tacconelli, MD; Friedrich-Michael Pieper; Daniel Wegener, MD; Juergen Dippon, PhD; Simon Muller, PhD; David Zakim, MD; Daniel Kitterer, MD; Martin Priwitzer, MD; Barbara Mezger; Birgit Walter-Frank, MD; Angela Corea, MD; Albrecht Wiedenmann, MD; Stefan Brockmann, MD; Christoph Pohlmann, MD, MS; M. Dominik Alscher, MD, CMO; and Niko Braun, MD, have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Stephan Segerer, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: served as an advisor or consultant for Roche; Baxter; served as a speaker or member of a speakers bureau for Roche; Baxter.

This study was supported by the Robert-Bosch Foundation.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2101.140861

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to http://www.medscape.org/journal/eid. Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers. You must be a registered user on Medscape. org. If you are not registered on Medscape.org, please click on the "Register" link on the right hand side of the website to register. Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions you will be able to view and/ or print your certificate. For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider, CME@medscape. net. For technical assistance, contact CME@webmd.net. American Medical Association's Physician's Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please refer to http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/awards/ama-physicians-recognition-award.page. The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits(tm). Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the certificate and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title

Clinical Course and Long-Term Outcome of Hantavirus-Associated Nephropathia Epidemica, Germany

CME Questions

1. Your patient is a 52-year-old man with Puumala virus (PUUV) hantavirus infection. According to the cross-sectional prospective survey by Latus and colleagues, which of the following statements about the clinical characteristics of acute nephropathia epidemica (NE) associated with PUUV hantavirus infection is correct?

A. Back pain, limb pain, and visual disorders are unusual during acute NE

B. An estimated 86% of patients had acute kidney injury (AKI) by RIFLE criteria

C. Most patients with AKI required transient renal replacement therapy

D. Thrombocytopenia occurred in one fifth of patients

2. According to the cross-sectional prospective survey by Latus and colleagues, which of the following statements about long-term sequelae of acute NE associated with PUUV hantavirus infection is correct?

A. At follow-up, 23% of patients had hypertension, of whom one third had preexisting hypertension and 67% had newly diagnosed hypertension

B. Proteinuria is often a long-term consequence of NE

C. Hematuria is not a long-term consequence of NE

D. The incidence of high blood pressure was significantly higher than in an age-matched cohort of patients without any history of NE

3. According to the cross-sectional prospective survey by Latus and colleagues, which of the following statements about serologic findings of NE associated with PUUV hantavirus infection would most likely be accurate?

A. Presence of neutralizing antibodies at long-term follow-up was explained by recurrent disease

B. At follow-up, one quarter of patients had detectable hantavirus-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG)

C. At follow-up, one quarter of patients had persistent IgM antibodies

D. Hantavirus-specific IgG and IgM were detected at time of diagnosis of NE

Activity Evaluation

1. The activity supported the learning objectives.

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

1 2 3 4 5

2. The material was organized clearly for learning to occur.

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

1 2 3 4 5

3. The content learned from this activity will impact my practice.

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

1 2 3 4 5

4. The activity was presented objectively and free of commercial bias.

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

1 2 3 4 5

References

(1.) Schmaljohn CS, Dalrymple JM. Analysis of Hantaan virus RNA: evidence for a new genus of Bunyaviridae. Virology. 1983;131:48291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(83)90514-7

(2.) Kruger DH, Ulrich R, Lundkvist AA. Hantavirus infections and their prevention. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:1129-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01474-5

(3.) Peters CJ, Simpson GL, Levy H. Spectrum of hantavirus infection: hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Annu Rev Med. 1999;50:531-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.50.1.531

(4.) Watson DC, Sargianou M, Papa A, Chra P, Starakis I, Panos G. Epidemiology of hantavirus infections in humans: a comprehensive, global overview. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2014;40:261-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2013.783555

(5.) Ettinger J, Hofmann J, Enders M, Tewald F, Oehme RM, Rosenfeld UM, et al. Multiple synchronous outbreaks of Puumala virus, Germany, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:1461-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1809.111447

(6.) Boone I, Wagner-Wiening C, Reil D, Jacob J, Rosenfeld UM, Ulrich RG, et al. Rise in the number of notified human hantavirus infections since October 2011 in Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany. Euro Surveill. 2012;17:20180.

(7.) Kruger DH, Ulrich RG, Hofmann J. Hantaviruses as zoonotic pathogens in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013;110:461-7.

(8.) Vapalahti O, Mustonen J, Lundkvist A, Henttonen H, Plyusnin A, Vaheri A. Hantavirus infections in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:653-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00774-6

(9.) Krautkramer E, Zeier M, Plyusnin A. Hantavirus infection: an emerging infectious disease causing acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2013;83:23-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2012.360

(10.) Braun N, Haap M, Overkamp D, Kimmel M, Alscher MD, Lehnert H, et al. Characterization and outcome following Puumala virus infection: a retrospective analysis of 75 cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:2997-3003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq118

(11.) Hjertqvist M, Klein SL, Ahlm C, Klingstrom J. Mortality rate patterns for hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome caused by Puumala virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1584-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1610.100242

(12.) Makary P, Kanerva M, Ollgren J, Virtanen MJ, Vapalahti O, Lyytikainen O. Disease burden of Puumala virus infections, 1995-2008. Epidemiol Infect. 2010;138:1484-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268810000087

(13.) Mustonen J, Brummer-Korvenkontio M, Hedman K, Pasternack A, Pietila K, Vaheri A. Nephropathia epidemica in Finland: a retrospective study of 126 cases. Scand J Infect Dis. 1994;26:7-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365549409008583

(14.) Settergren B, Juto P, Trollfors B, Wadell G, Norrby SR. Hemorrhagic complications and other clinical findings in nephropathia epidemica in Sweden: a study of 355 serologically verified cases. J Infect Dis. 1988;157:380-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/157.2.380

(15.) Rasche FM, Uhel B, Kruger DH, Karges W, Czock D, Hampl W, et al. Thrombocytopenia and acute renal failure in Puumala hantavirus infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1420-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1008.031069

(16.) Ala-Houhala I, Koskinen M, Ahola T, Harmoinen A, Kouri T, Laurila K, et al. Increased glomerular permeability in patients with nephropathia epidemica caused by Puumala hantavirus. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17:246-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/172.246

(17.) Niklasson B, Hellsten G, LeDuc J. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: a study of sequelae following nephropathia epidemica. Arch Virol. 1994;137:241-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01309472

(18.) Makela S, Ala-Houhala I, Mustonen J, Koivisto AM, Kouri T, Turjanmaa V, et al. Renal function and blood pressure five years after Puumala virus-induced nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2000;58:1711-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00332.x

(19.) Miettinen MH, Makela SM, Ala-Houhala IO, Huhtala HS, Koobi T, Vaheri AI, et al. Ten-year prognosis of Puumala hantavirus-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int. 2006;69:2043-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5000334

(20.) Lahdevirta J. Nephropathia epidemica in Finland. A clinical histological and epidemiological study. Ann Clin Res. 1971;3:1-54.

(21.) Lahdevirta J, Collan Y, Jokinen EJ, Hiltunen R. Renal sequelae to nephropathia epidemica. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [A]. 1978;86:265-71.

(22.) Rubini ME, Jablon S, Mc DM. Renal residuals of acute epidemic hemorrhagic fever. Arch Intern Med. 1960;106:378-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1960.03820030066011

(23.) Kleinknecht D, Rollin PE. Hypertension after hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Nephron. 1992;61:121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000186853

(24.) Krautkramer E, Grouls S, Urban E, Schnitzler P, Zeier M. No gender-related differences in the severity of nephropathia epidemica, Germany. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-457

(25.) Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension. 2005;45:142-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000150859.47929.8e

(26.) Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.19.2560

(27.) Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P. Acute renal failure--definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8:R204-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2872

(28.) Outinen TK, Tervo L, Makela S, Huttunen R, Maenpaa N, Huhtala H, et al. Plasma levels of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor associate with the clinical severity of acute Puumala hantavirus infection. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e71335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071335

(29.) Outinen TK, Makela SM, Ala-Houhala IO, Huhtala HS, Hurme M, Paakkala AS, et al. The severity of Puumala hantavirus induced nephropathia epidemica can be better evaluated using plasma interleukin-6 than C-reactive protein determinations. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-132

(30.) Krautkramer E, Grouls S, Stein N, Reiser J, Zeier M. Pathogenic old world hantaviruses infect renal glomerular and tubular cells and induce disassembling of cell-to-cell contacts. J Virol. 2011;85:9811-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00568-11

(31.) Vaheri A, Strandin T, Hepojoki J, Sironen T, Henttonen H, Makela S, et al. Uncovering the mysteries of hantavirus infections. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:539-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3066

(32.) Turcinov D, Puljiz I, Markotic A, Kuzman I, Begovac J. Clinical and laboratory findings in patients with oliguric and non-oliguric hantavirus haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: an analysis of 128 patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:674-9. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03994.x

(33.) Heyman P, Vaheri A, Lundkvist A, Avsic-Zupanc T. Hantavirus infections in Europe: from virus carriers to a major public-health problem. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009;7:205-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14787210.7.2.205

(34.) Hautala N, Kauma H, Vapalahti O, Mahonen SM, Vainio O, Vaheri A, et al. Prospective study on ocular findings in acute Puumala hantavirus infection in hospitalised patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:559-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.185413

(35.) Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, Giampaoli S, Hense HW, Joffres M, et al. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA. 2003;289:2363-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.18.2363

(36.) Elgh F, Linderholm M, Wadell G, Tarnvik A, Juto P. Development of humoral cross-reactivity to the nucleocapsid protein of heterologous hantaviruses in nephropathia epidemica. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1998;22:309-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574- 695X.1998.tb01220.x

(37.) Elgh F, Lundkvist A, Alexeyev OA, Stenlund H, Avsic-Zupanc T, Hjelle B, et al. Serological diagnosis of hantavirus infections by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on detection of immunoglobulin G and M responses to recombinant nucleocapsid proteins of five viral serotypes. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:1122-30.

(38.) Maes P, Clement J, Gavrilovskaya I, Van Ranst M. Hantaviruses: immunology, treatment, and prevention. Viral Immunol. 2004;17:481-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/vim.2004.17.481

(39.) Klempa B, Meisel H, Rath S, Bartel J, Ulrich R, Kruger DH. Occurrence of renal and pulmonary syndrome in a region of northeast Germany where Tula hantavirus circulates. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:4894-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.10.48944897.2003

(40.) Klempa B, Schutt M, Auste B, Labuda M, Ulrich R, Meisel H, et al. First molecular identification of human Dobrava virus infection in central. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:1322-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.3.1322-1325.2004

Author affiliations: Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany (J. Latus, F.-M. Pieper, D. Wegener, D. Zakim, D. Kitterer, C. Pohlmann, M.D. Alscher, N. Braun); Dr. Margarete FischerBosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart (M. Schwab); University Hospital Tubingen, Germany (M. Schwab, E. Tacconelli); University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart (J. Dippon, S. Muller); University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (S. Segerer); Local Health Authority, Stuttgart (M. Priwitzer, B. Mezger); Local Health Authority, Boblingen, Germany (B. Walter-Frank), Local Health Authority, Esslingen, Germany (A. Corea, A. Wiedenmann); and Local Health Authority, Reutlingen, Germany (S. Brockmann)

Dr. Latus is a resident in the Nephrology department at the Robert-Bosch- Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany. His primary research interests are zoonoses, especially the clinical course of hantavirus infections.

Address for correspondence: Niko Braun, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Auerbachstr. 110, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany; email: Niko.Braun@rbk.de
Table 1. Baseline characteristics for 456 persons during acute
hantavirus infection, Germany, 2001-2012

                                          Median value (range) or
                                         no. or % patients positive
Variable                                        for variable
Sex, no.
  M                                                 290
  F                                                 166
Age at diagnosis                                48 y (40-59)
Patient status, no.
  Inpatient                                         335
  Outpatient                                        121
Duration of hospital stay                        7 d (5-9)
Duration of illness at hospital                  5 d (3-7)
  admission or first visit to general
  practitioner/nephrologist
Duration of fever before hospital                4 d (2-6)
admission
Duration of disease                              4 wk (2-8)
Assumed exposure to virus, %
  Occupational                                       7
  During leisure activities                          93
Symptoms, %
  Pain
    Abdominal                                        33
    Back                                             67
    Limbs                                            71
    Headache                                         68
  Visual disorders                                   22
  Diarrhea                                           20
  Nausea/vomiting                                    47
  Dyspnea                                            2
  Loss of appetite                                   4
  Fatigue                                            7
  Shivering                                          2
Clinical signs
  Fever, %                                           90
  Duration of fever                              5 d (3-7)
  Hemorrhage, %                                      7
  Blood pressure
    Systolic,                               130 mm Hg (120-146)
    Diastolic                                 80 mm Hg (71-90)
    Heart rate                              76 beats/min (64-86)
    Hypertension, %                                  15
    Hypotension, %                                   10
  Shock, %                                           1
  Chest radiograph, %                                47
    Pathologic findings on                           23
    radiograph, %
  Abdominal ultrasound, %                            65
    Splenomegaly, %                                  14
    Hepatomegaly, %                                  4
  Acute kidney injury, % *                           86

* According to RIFLE (risk of renal dysfunction) criteria (27).

Table 2. Laboratory results for serum samples obtained from
456 persons experiencing acute hantavirus-associated
nephropathia epidemica, Germany, 2001-2012 *

Laboratory test                  Median value       Reference value
                                    (range)

Creatinine, serum, maximum    2.7 mg/dL (1.6-4.8)    0.5-1.4 mg/dL

Platelet count                                          >150 x
                                                     [10.sup.9]/L
  At admission or first          122 (81-197)
    visit with a general
    practitioner/
    nephrologist
  Minimum                        113 (75-189)
  At discharge ([section])       281 (226-353)

Hematocrit                                             0.37-0.47
  At admission or first        0.42 (0.39-0.47)
    visit with a general
    practitioner/
    nephrologist
  At discharge                 0.40 (0.36-0.43)

C-reactive protein                                   0.1-0.4 mg/dL
  At admission or first        4 mg/dL (2.4-7.1)
    visit with a general
    practitioner/
    nephrologist
  Maximum                     4.5 mg/dL (2.8-8.2)
  At discharge ([section])    0.9 mg/dL (0.4-1.7)

Liver enzyme ([dagger])
  Aspartate                                             <50 U/L
    aminotransferase
    At admission or first       36 U/L (27-55)
      visit with a general
      practitioner/
      nephrologist
    At discharge                51 U/L (30-71)
      ([section])
  Alanine aminotransferase                              <50 U/L
    At admission or first       35 U/L (24-57)
      visit with a general
      practitioner/
      nephrologist
    At discharge ([dagger])     64 U/L (35-101)

Lactate dehydrogenase          273 U/L (240-323)       <250 U/L
([double dagger])

* All patients were adults who had received a diagnosis
of serologically and clinically confirmed hantavirus infection.

([dagger]) 35% of patients had elevated levels of liver enzymes
at admission or first visit with a general practitioner/nephrologist.

([double dagger]) 66% of patients had elevated levels of lactate
dehydrogenase at admission or first visit with a general
practitioner/nephrologist.

([section]) 335 patients who received in-patient treatment.

Table 3. Baseline characteristics for 456 participants in a follow-up
study to determine the clinical course and long-term outcome of
hantavirus-associated nephropathia epidemica, Germany, 2001-2012 *

                                      Median value (range) or %
Variable                           patients positive for variable

Laboratory test
  Creatinine, serum                      0.9 mg/dL (0.8-1.0)
  Blood cell counts
    Leukocytes                      6.7 x [10.sup.9]/L (5.7-7.9)
    Platelets                       231 x [10.sup.9]/L (201-268)
  Hemoglobin                            14.9 g/dL (14.1-15.6)
  Hematocrit                              0.43 (0.42-0.46)
  Uric acid                              5.2 mg/dL (4.3-6.0)
  Liver enzymes
    Aspartate aminotransferase             21 U/L (17-25)
    Alanine aminotransferase               21 U/L (15-30)
  Lactate dehydrogenase                   158 U/L (142-180)
  C-reactive protein                     0.1 mg/dL (0.1-0.2)
  Urinalysis
    Proteinuria                                   7
    Hematuria                                    26
    Leukocyuria                                  15
    Presence of bacteria                          0
  Hantavirus-specific antibodies
    IgM present                                   9
    IgG present                                  100

Clinical test
  Blood pressure ([dagger])
    Systolic                             135 mm Hg (125-148)
    Diastolic                             83 mm Hg (76-90)
    Hypertension at first                        45
      follow-up, 203/456
      participants
    Stage 1 hypertension, 98/203                 48
      hypertensive patients
    Stage 2 hypertension,                        52
      105/203 hypertensive
      patients
    Hypertension at second                       23
      follow-up up
      ([double dagger])
      Stage 1 hypertension                       66
      Stage 2 hypertension                       34
  Heart rate                            70 beats/min (59-79)
Use antihypertensive drugs                       43
Family history of hypertension                   60
Smoke cigarettes/cigars                          33
Concomitant condition
  Coronary heart disease                          4
  Peripheral arterial disease                     1
  Heart failure                                   2
  Diabetes mellitus                               3

Variable                               Reference value

Laboratory test
  Creatinine, serum                     0.5-1.4 mg/dL
  Blood cell counts
    Leukocytes                     4.0-11.3 x [10.sup.9]/L
    Platelets                        >150 x [10.sup.9]/L
  Hemoglobin                             13-18 g/dL
  Hematocrit                              0.37-0.47
  Uric acid                             4.8-5.6 mg/dL
  Liver enzymes
    Aspartate aminotransferase             <50 U/L
    Alanine aminotransferase               <50 U/L
  Lactate dehydrogenase                   <250 U/L
  C-reactive protein                    0.1-0.4 mg/dL
  Urinalysis
    Proteinuria                               --
    Hematuria                                 --
    Leukocyuria                               --
    Presence of bacteria                      --
  Hantavirus-specific antibodies
    IgM present                               --
    IgG present                               --

Clinical test
  Blood pressure ([dagger])
    Systolic                                  --
    Diastolic                                 --
    Hypertension at first                     --
      follow-up, 203/456
      participants
    Stage 1 hypertension, 98/203              --
      hypertensive patients
    Stage 2 hypertension,                     --
      105/203 hypertensive
      patients
    Hypertension at second                    --
      follow-up up
      ([double dagger])
      Stage 1 hypertension                    --
      Stage 2 hypertension                    --
  Heart rate                                  --
Use antihypertensive drugs                    --
Family history of hypertension                --
Smoke cigarettes/cigars                       --
Concomitant condition
  Coronary heart disease                      --
  Peripheral arterial disease                 --
  Heart failure                               --
  Diabetes mellitus                           --

* Study participants were adults who had received a diagnosis of
serologically and clinically confirmed hantavirus infection during
2001-2012 and who later (7-35 mo) participated in a follow-up study.
--, not applicable.

([dagger]) Hypertension stages 1 and 2 were defined according to
the classification of blood pressure for adults (26).

([double dagger]) Includes only those participants who
had hypertension at the first follow-up visit.
COPYRIGHT 2015 U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:RESEARCH
Author:Latus, Joerg; Schwab, Matthias; Tacconelli, Evelina; Pieper, Friedrich- Michael; Wegener, Daniel; Di
Publication:Emerging Infectious Diseases
Geographic Code:4EUGE
Date:Jan 1, 2015
Words:6154
Previous Article:Rates and risk factors for coccidioidomycosis among prison inmates, California, USA, 2011.
Next Article:Detection of Zika virus in urine.
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters