Printer Friendly

Clinical Aspects of Idiopathic Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review for Pathologists.

Clinical and pathologic features of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), that is, Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), have been extensively studied for almost a century. Also, during the last decade, the incidence and prevalence of IBD has increased in Asian countries. Therefore, there is an increasing need for pathologists with expertise in IBD. Pathology plays an essential role in the clinical care and management of patients with IBD. This begins from the interpretation of the first set of diagnostic biopsies, monitoring the disease activity and detection of colorectal neoplasia on surveillance endoscopic biopsies, to the evaluation of surgical resection specimens. Moreover, histology still remains as the gold standard for IBD-related research. However, the histologic interpretation of these specimens by practicing pathologists requires in-depth knowledge of the clinical aspects of the diseases. Thus, this review seeks to provide the necessary information about the clinical and surgical aspects of IBD to practicing pathologists. It also includes a brief appraisal of IBD in Asian regions and IBD in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), 2 conditions that are not routinely reviewed in pathology literature.


Knowledge regarding the indications and guidelines for endoscopy and tissue sampling will help pathologic interpretation. In this section, we also review the common pathologic findings in IBD as well as normal histology of small and large intestine and mimics of IBD. The concept of histologic mucosal healing, which may potentially serve as a new treatment target in the future, has gained renewed interest.

Endoscopy and Tissue Sampling

Endoscopy and tissue sampling is fundamental in the diagnosis and surveillance of IBD. For initial diagnostic biopsies from patients with possible IBD, at least 2 biopsies from 5 different sites, including terminal ileum and rectum and both diseased and normal-appearing mucosa, should be submitted in separate containers. (1,2) Patients with chronic constipation or symptoms of dyschezia may show features of rectal prolapse mimicking IBD; therefore, biopsy from the anterior rectal wall is preferred in these patients. Sodium phosphate-based bowel preparations and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may induce histologic changes mimicking IBD, and hence should be avoided. (1)

In surveillance colonoscopy and ileoscopy, all endoscopically visible lesions as well as each colonic segment are sampled. In pancolitis, 4-quadrant biopsies every 10 cm from the cecum to the rectum for a minimum of 33 biopsies are performed to screen for dysplasia. In nonpancolitis, the sampling can be limited to the endoscopically or histologically involved segments of greatest extent documented by any colonoscopy. For the distal colon, sampling every 5 cm may be considered because of a greater risk of colorectal cancer in this site. (3) Fulminant colitis is a contraindication for colonoscopy; however, flexible sigmoidoscopy may be considered. (4)

If an upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract endoscopy is performed for suspected IBD, at least 2 biopsies from the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum are performed. (3)

Histology of Normal Small-Bowel and Colonic Biopsy

Normal small-bowel mucosal biopsies show slender and fingerlike villi. The villi are shorter and broader in the first portion or bulb of the duodenum, and are also shorter in the ileum. Scattered intraepithelial T lymphocytes (about 1 lymphocyte per every 5 epithelial cells) are normally seen in the villi. Paneth cells are situated in the base of the crypts of Liberkuhn. Although intraepithelial lymphocytes may be seen in the crypt and surface epithelium, intraepithelial neutrophils, either in the crypts or villi, are abnormal. The base of the crypt anchors on the muscularis mucosae without intervening inflammatory cells, unless there are lymphoid aggregates/Peyer patches. The lamina propria contains plasma cells, lymphocytes, eosinophils, histiocytes, and mast cells. Lymphoid nodules can be seen in any part of the small bowel. The mononuclear inflammatory cell density in the lamina propria is higher in the duodenum compared with the rest of the small bowel. Submucosal Brunner glands are present in the duodenum, but are absent in the rest of the small bowel. Peyer patches are prominent in the terminal ileum. (5)

In well-oriented colonic mucosa, the base of the crypt directly anchors on the upper edge of the muscularis mucosae, without intervening inflammatory cells (Figure 1, A), unless there are lymphoid aggregates. The crypts are regularly and evenly arranged without branching, distortion, or dropout. Rectal and sigmoid colon biopsies may show somewhat conspicuous baseline distortion compared with the right colon. For example, 1 to 2 bifurcated crypts are considered normal in these sites. (6)

Paneth cells are normal components of the small intestine up to the transverse colon. Descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum are devoid of Paneth cells. (6) Pyloric-type mucous glands are absent in the colon. (6-8) Surface intraepithelial lymphocytes can be seen, up to 20 per 100 epithelial cells, with a greater degree in the right colon. Lymphoid aggregates are common in colonic biopsies, and the mucosal surface overlying those areas may show marked intraepithelial lymphocytosis. Mononuclear inflammatory cells in the lamina propria are more prominent in the right colon compared with the left, whereas the proportion of goblet cells and muciphages in the lamina propria increases distally. (6) Bowel preparation may induce mild neutrophilic inflammation in the surface epithelium or focal cryptitis. (9)

Activity and Chronicity

Activity refers to neutrophil-induced crypt and/or surface epithelial injury, which includes erosion, superficial ulceration, cryptitis, and crypt abscess. Chronicity refers to histologic features indicative of longstanding mucosal injury and damage of tissue structure. In general, 4 histologic features are used to determine chronicity. First, crypt architectural distortion or crypt branching (Figure 1, B) is a relatively objective criterion with a caveat that crypts of the sigmoid colon and rectal biopsy may appear somewhat distorted and bifurcated in normal states. Also, the biopsy procedure itself may induce artifactual crypt distortion, especially at the base of the crypts near areas sampled without muscularis mucosae. Secondly, basal lymphoplasmacytosis, the separation of the base of the crypts and muscularis mucosa by lymphoplasmacytic inflammation in well-oriented sections, is a feature of chronicity (Figure 1, B). As the evaluation of this feature requires well-oriented sections with intact crypts, this may not always be appreciated in tangentially oriented biopsies or in ulcer beds. Third, the presence of Paneth cells distal to splenic flexure indicates a metaplastic process and suggests chronicity (Figure 1, C). Thus, this feature is useful in left colon biopsies. Lastly, the presence of pyloric-type mucous glands--pyloric gland metaplasia (PGM)--in the ileum or colon biopsy is abnormal and indicates chronic mucosal injury (Figure 1, D). Pyloric gland metaplasia is not specific for CD, but tends to be commonly observed in CD than in UC. (7,9-11) Marked mononuclear cell infiltrate in the lamina propria can be seen in ulcer and fulminant colitis as well as in chronic mucosal injury. Therefore, it may be prudent to search for other evidence of chronicity when heavy plasma cell-rich lamina propria infiltrate is encountered. Some pathologists accept sheets of mononuclear cells in the lamina propria as a feature of chronicity. Again, however, it should be kept in mind that the right colon can have prominent lamina propria mononuclear inflammatory cells in the normal state. In the small bowel, unequivocal villous atrophy is a feature of chronicity.

Lower GI Tract Biopsy of IBD

When there are both activity and convincing histologic features of chronicity, a histologic diagnosis indicative of these findings, for example, chronic active colitis, is rendered. In CD and surveillance biopsies for UC after treatment, the activity may be focal and the chronicity may not be obvious. Well-controlled IBD biopsies may be unremarkable or show chronicity but no activity indicative of quiescent/inactive colitis. Ileal biopsies in CD may show activity and PGM indicative of chronic active enteritis/ileitis. In pediatric IBD patients, chronicity may not be evident until later in the disease course. Therefore, pediatric patients suspected of having IBD need to be closely followed despite the lack of chronicity in initial biopsies. (12)

Upper GI Tract Biopsy of IBD

Crohn disease patients with upper GI involvement may show inflammation, erosion, ulceration, duodenal villous atrophy, mucosal edema, and granulomas. (13) Especially in pediatric CD, esophageal biopsy may show marked intraepithelial lymphocytosis. (14) Duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytosis with intact villous architecture can also be seen in CD. (15) So-called "focally enhanced gastritis" pattern injury can be seen in but is not specific for CD. (16) A subset of UC patients may show esophagitis, gastritis, duodenitis, and intraepithelial lymphocytosis. (1)

Histologic Differential Diagnosis of IBD

Although all IBD biopsies demonstrate chronicity at some point of the disease course, not all chronicity equates to IBD. Colitis by other etiologies may show chronicity, mimicking IBD.

Chronic Infectious Colitis/Enteritis.--Usually self-limiting infectious colitis does not demonstrate chronicity, and is characterized by heavy neutrophilic infiltrates predominating in the lamina propria. However, indolent colitides caused by infectious agents, such as Entamoeba histolytica and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB), may resemble IBD by their well-developed chronicity and granuloma (in ITB). Yersinia is another histologic mimic of CD with frequent granulomas. The distinction is important because immunosuppressive therapy may be considered for IBD, whereas it is generally contraindicated in infection. The identification of organisms in the biopsy and isolation or cultivation of the pathogens in the stool specimens confirm the diagnosis. Alternatively, clinical correlation with serologic studies may help to arrive at a correct diagnosis. (17)

Medication-Induced Colitis.--Colitis induced by drugs, such as by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or mycophenolate mofetil in the posttransplant setting, can mimic IBD histologically. (18) Although chronicity including crypt architectural distortion and Paneth cells in the left colon may be seen in mycophenolate mofetil-associated colitis, the additional pattern of injury, such as crypt apoptosis and isolated crypt damage, may be conspicuous compared with IBD. (19) High index of suspicion and establishing a temporal relationship between the medication use and the onset of clinical symptom are crucial to arrive at a correct diagnosis.

Chronic Ischemia.--In chronic ischemia, finding a coexisting typical ischemic pattern of injury such as attenuated crypts in association with hyalinized lamina propria and surface injury may be helpful in differentiating chronic ischemia from IBD. In addition, the degree of active and chronic inflammation tends to be milder in chronic ischemia compared with typical IBD. (17) Conversely, IBD patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism due to generalized hypercoagulability. (20,21) Therefore, ischemic injury may be superimposed on preexisting injury due to IBD.

Miscellaneous.--Diverticular disease-associated colitis is another histologic mimic of IBD. In diverticular disease-associated colitis (Figure 2, A and B), the topographic distribution of colitis is in association with diverticular disease. The finding of rectal sparing may also be helpful. (22) Microscopic colitis--lymphocytic/collagenous colitis--may demonstrate IBD-like features with crypt architectural distortion, Paneth cells in the left colon, and conspicuous neutrophilic crypt injury. (23) However, these features tend to be focal. In addition, the predominant pattern of injury is lymphocytic or collagenous colitis with no significant endoscopic disease in microscopic colitis. (24) Of note, IBD patients may display features of microscopic colitis at the onset of the disease or during the follow-up (Figure 2, C). (25,26) Therefore, the histology needs to be interpreted in conjunction with clinical and endoscopic findings. Mucosal prolapse may result in scarring of the lamina propria and distorted crypts and/or activity, mimicking IBD. Diversion colitis shows diverse histology; it may mimic chronic active UC with crypt architectural distortion and marked mononuclear cell infiltrate, or resemble CD with aphthous lesions and patchy cryptitis. Knowing that the sample is from a diverted segment of colon will be the most helpful. If observed, endoscopic mucosal nodularity may also be helpful in recognizing diversion colitis (Figure 2, D). (27) Behcet disease is an important differential diagnosis before a diagnosis of CD is made, especially in Asia (see "CD in Asia" below).

Initial Diagnostic Biopsy Versus Surveillance Biopsy

The information that needs to be relayed to clinicians depends on the clinical circumstances. In initial diagnostic biopsies prior to treatment, documenting that chronic injury is present and the distribution of the inflammation (segmental versus diffuse) is relevant. Finding chronicity in the appropriate clinical setting favors IBD over other etiologies, especially infectious colitis. (28) Therefore, in cases with subtle features of chronicity, additional level sections may aid in confirming the chronicity and arriving at a correct diagnosis. The presence or absence of granulomas, patchy inflammation indicative of skip lesions, and ileal involvement are especially informative in diagnosing CD. Accurate assessment of disease distribution prior to the initiation of medical therapy is crucial for the correct classification of CD versus UC. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that the endoscopist biopsy from the entire colon and terminal ileum according to current guidelines during the index endoscopy. (1)

On the other hand, the primary goal of surveillance biopsies in established IBD patients is to monitor disease activity and screen for dysplasia and malignancy. The presence or absence of granuloma and dysplasia is routinely documented in surveillance biopsies. In addition, unexpected histologic findings to account for clinical symptoms--for example, superimposed infection, ischemia, or microscopic colitis--may be seen, which may alter the management. One of the well-known causes of refractoriness to treatment in IBD is cytomegalovirus infection. Immunohistochemical stain for cytomegalovirus is more sensitive in detecting viral inclusions than routine hematoxylin-eosin stain, and hence may be indicated in such cases (Figure 2, E). (29) Superimposed Clostridium difficile-associated colitis also not uncommonly complicates the clinical manifestation of IBD patients. Histologic examination may give clues as to the presence of C. difficile-associated colitis (Figure 2, F), and detection of C. difficile toxin gene by polymerase chain reaction in the stool confirms the diagnosis.

Documenting chronicity or distribution of the disease may not be as important in surveillance biopsies as in initial diagnostic biopsies. Chronicity may become inconspicuous, or the biopsy may even be unremarkable in well-controlled IBD biopsies. Furthermore, treatment may alter the distribution of the disease. For example, UC may manifest as skip lesions after treatment. In cases where clinicians request reclassification or confirmation of the diagnosis on mucosal biopsies in established IBD patients, a review of initial systematic diagnostic biopsies prior to treatment may be indicated.

Activity Score and Mucosal Healing

Comprehensive histologic grading schemes are available in the literature to assess the degree of activity, such as the Riley score and the Geboes score. (30,31) Endoscopic activity grading schemes are also available: for example, Rutgeert score and Lemman score for CD and Mayo score and UC Endoscopic Index of Severity for UC. (32) Endoscopic mild activity refers to the presence of erythema, decreased vascular pattern, and mild friability, and moderate activity refers to marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, and erosions (Figure 3, A). In severe disease, spontaneous bleeding and ulceration may occur. A correlation study between the histologic and endoscopic grading schemes in UC showed that the histologic and endoscopic activity scores of inactive disease and disease with severe activity correlated well, whereas histologic activity was variable in endoscopically mildly to moderately active disease. (33) The assessment of activity is used in monitoring the response to therapy and determining the endpoint-mucosal healing. (34,35)

Mucosal healing is a known predictor of favorable longterm outcome in both UC and CD, and may potentially alter the disease course. (36) Endoscopic mucosal healing is defined as an absence of friability, blood, erosions, and ulcers in all visualized segments (Figure 3, B), and it has been established as a treatment target in UC. (37,38) However, histologic mucosal healing is yet to be defined, and its implication and application in clinical practice are to be determined. A recent study showed that histologic mucosal healing, when defined as crypt architectural changes without erosions, crypt abscesses, or neutrophilic infiltration, not only is distinct from endoscopic mucosal healing, but also is a better predictor of clinical outcome. (38) In addition, the overall activity by histologic evaluation during the IBD course appears to be associated with the risk of colorectal neoplasia. (39) Histologic mucosal healing may potentially become a part of outcome measurements of clinical management and clinical trials in IBD in the future.


The distribution and extent of UC at presentation are predictive of its biology and prognosis, and impact clinical care and surveillance. Pathology is crucial for recognizing atypical forms and proper evaluation of the surgical resection specimens.

UC: Phenotype

Ulcerative colitis is classified into subtypes depending on the extent and severity of the disease at diagnosis. By Montreal classification, E1 is inflammation limited to the rectum (proctitis), E2 is limited to the splenic flexure (left-sided colitis), and E3 is pancolitis. Also, S0 to S4 is assigned by the gastroenterologists depending on the clinical symptoms, including the number of stools per day, systemic symptoms, and serologic inflammatory markers. (40) At diagnosis, 30% to 50% present as distal colitis (proctitis or involvement of the sigmoid colon), 20% to 30% as E2, and 20% as E3. (41) The extent of disease may change; 25% to 50% of distal colitis at diagnosis eventually progress proximally (progressive flare). (42) The extent of disease is also predictive of a likelihood of future colectomy and colorectal cancer. (42,43)

UC: Cancer Risk and Surveillance

Colorectal cancer risk in UC is cumulative; a metaanalysis showed that the overall colorectal cancer risk is 2% after 10 years, 8% after 20 years, and 18% after 30 years of diagnosis. (44) However, a recent population-based study showed that the risk of colorectal cancer in UC substantially decreased during the period of 1999-2008 (relative risk of 0.57) compared with 1979-1988 (relative risk of 1.34), with the overall relative risk of 1.07. The authors postulated that UC may no longer pose an increased risk for colorectal carcinoma as long as there are no additional adverse factors, such as concomitant PSC, long duration of disease, and a young age of onset. (45)

In general, the surveillance program for UC ensues 8 to 10 years after the diagnosis and every 1 to 3 years thereafter. (46) The exceptions to this are UC restricted to the rectum or rectosigmoid colon and patients with coexisting PSC. Patients with proctitis and proctosigmoiditis have little or no increased risk of cancer compared with the general population; therefore, the usual screening program for colorectal cancer for the general population may suffice for these patients. (46) The risk of colorectal carcinoma in UC patients with concomitant PSC is 4 times greater than in those without PSC; thus, these patients are subject to annual surveillance at the time of diagnosis. (46)

UC: Surgery and Pathologic Examination of Surgical Resection Specimen

The symptoms of UC differ depending on the severity of inflammation and the distribution of the disease. Patients with UC generally experience abdominal pain, diarrhea, and rectal bleeding with alternating periods of remission and relapse, and 20% to 30% of the patients eventually undergo colectomy within 10 years of diagnosis. (47,48) Indication for surgery is divided into 3 categories. Emergent surgery is performed for life-threatening fulminant colitis unresponsive to medical treatment. Urgent surgery is performed for patients admitted to the hospital with severe UC that is not responsive to intensive treatment. Elective procedures are performed for patients who cannot tolerate maintenance treatment, are refractory to treatment, or have dysplasia or cancer.

Because of the high complication rate associated with pouch procedure during acute inflammation, the emergent and urgent procedures are performed in stages. The first stage is subtotal colectomy with a temporary ileostomy, without removing the rectal stump. After recovery from the first procedure, an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is created and the ileostomy is closed. (49) If the surgery is elective, total proctocolectomy is followed by creation of a pouch. This can be done as a 2- or 3-stage procedure to reduce the risk of pelvic complication. (50) In selected patients, total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or colostomy with Hartmann procedure may be offered with continued surveillance of the rectum or Hartmann pouch, respectively. (51)

Typical UC is a mucosa-limited disease without submucosal fibrosis or mural scarring. Therefore, unlike CD colon, UC colon tends to lie flat on the grossing table when opened (Figure 4, A). The mucosal disease usually involves the rectum and extends proximally with sharp or inconspicuous demarcation between the diseased and uninvolved segments. Skip lesions with inflammatory involvement of the cecum or right colon in left-sided colitis, relative rectal sparing, ileal involvement, and deep fissuring ulcers may be seen in atypical forms of UC (see "UC: Atypical Features" below). The disease in typical UC is confined within the mucosa (Figure 4, B). The absence of characteristic histology for CD such as transmural inflammation with transmural lymphoid aggregates and granuloma in an otherwise mucosa-limited chronic active/inactive colitis, in conjunction with clinical history, supports the diagnosis of UC.

UC: Atypical Features

Typical UC involves the rectum and extends proximally continuously without skip lesion. However, several atypical features may lead to misdiagnosis as CD.

Skip Lesions and Rectal Sparing.--Treated UC patients may show patchy disease with rectal sparing and skip lesions. Similarly, left-sided or rectal UC may have a skip lesion involving the cecum--referred to as cecal patch, appendiceal orifice inflammation, or periappendiceal red patch--or have inflammation in the right colon, mimicking CD. The clinical features of UC with skip lesion do not differ from those of conventional UC without skip lesion. (52,53) In resection specimens for UC, discontinuous appendiceal involvement as a skip lesion is identified in 12% to 86% of patients (Figure 4, C). (54-56) Earlier studies suggested that appendiceal involvement as a skip lesion is indicative of active disease; however, the findings were not validated in subsequent studies. (52,53,57,58) In the study of Glickman et al, (12) 22 of 73 pediatric UC patients (30%) presented with relative or complete rectal sparing in pretreatment biopsy, and patchy disease was seen in 15 patients (21%). Fulminant UC may show rectal sparing and linear deep ulcers, resembling CD. (59,60)

Granuloma.--It is well known that not all granulomas are indicative of CD. Typical Crohn granuloma is well formed and epithelioid, and is preferably situated away from injured epithelium. In UC, granulomas can be formed secondary to epithelial injury such as that seen next to a ruptured crypt or underneath erosion. These epithelial injury-associated granulomas are loosely formed in proximity to damaged crypts or eroded surface (Figure 4, D); mucin or neutrophils may be seen within the granuloma. Deeper levels may demonstrate direct association of epithelial injury with granuloma in equivocal cases.

Upper GI Tract Involvement.--Lin et al (61) reported intense focal gastritis, mixed basal inflammation, and superficial plasmacytosis in 17 (29%), 13 (22%), and 12 (20%) of 59 gastric biopsies from UC patients, respectively, as well as duodenal involvement. Another study also reported focally enhanced gastritis in 6 of 27 UC patients (22%) without Helicobacter pylori. (62) In the study of Lin et al, (61) 4 patients with diffuse chronic duodenitis developed pouchitis (for definition, see "Pouchitis" below). Some UC patients may show duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytosis without villous blunting, similar to that seen in CD. (17)

Backwash Ileitis.--Backwash ileitis refers to ileal involvement of UC secondary to incompetence of the ileocecal valve, usually in the context of pancolitis. The prevalence of backwash ileitis was reported to be 17% (34 of 200 UC patients). (63) The major differential diagnosis of backwash ileitis is ileal CD. Although there are no standardized diagnostic criteria, the degree of inflammation and villous blunting tends to be milder in backwash ileitis of UC compared with that of CD. (11,63,64) Conversely, if the length of involved ileum is more than 5 cm, with significant submucosal inflammation, granuloma, crypt architectural distortion, and fissure formation, it possibly represents CD involving the ileum. Backwash ileitis does not appear to pose an increased risk for pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, dysplasia, or carcinoma. (46,63,65)


Accurate assessment of the distribution of CD at presentation prior to treatment is important for prognostication and management. Colonoscopic surveillance is recommended for a subset of patients with CD.

CD: Phenotype

In the Montreal modification of the Vienna classification, the phenotype of CD is classified per the age of onset (A1, [less than or equal to] 16 years; A2, 17-40 years; A3, >40 years), location (L1, terminal ileum; L2, colon; L3, ileocolon; L4, upper GI), and behavior (B1, nonstricturing, nonpenetrating; B2, stricturing; B3, penetrating), with a modifier p for perianal disease. The B2 and B3 classifications are considered complicated behavior. (40)

Recently, a large-scale population-based study was performed on 306 CD patients in a Midwest county in the United States. (66) In this report, common phenotypes at diagnosis were A2 (56.2%; 172 patients) and L1 (45.1%; 138 patients), followed by L2 (32%; 98 patients) and L3 (19%; 57 patients). The most common behavior at diagnosis was B1 (81.4%; 249 patients). However, at 20 years after diagnosis, 50.8% of noncomplicated (B1) patients experienced complicated behaviors (stricturing or penetrating; B2 or B3). Presence of ileal disease and perianal disease at diagnosis appears to be a risk factor for intestinal complications. (66,67) Similar studies on Swedish and European populations reported predominance of L2. (68,69) Although the behavior frequently changes during the course of disease, the location remains relatively stable. (67,70,71)

CD: Cancer Risk and Surveillance

Unlike UC, in which the cancer risk is cumulative, colorectal cancer risk in CD is not well established, possibly because of confounding factors including variable anatomic involvement and chemoprevention. (46,72) Nevertheless, colorectal cancer risk in CD appears to be comparable with that in UC, particularly when there is colonic involvement, with an estimated overall relative risk of 2.5. By meta-analysis, the relative risk is estimated to be 4.5 for colonic CD and 1.1 for ileal CD. (46,72) There is substantial evidence that small-bowel CD poses an up to 27 times increased risk for small-bowel cancer. The risk was suggested to be higher for ileal CD. (46,73) In addition, malignancy arising in association with perianal fistulas has been reported, of which 59% (36 of 61 cases) were adenocarcinoma and 31% (19 of 61 cases) squamous cell carcinoma. (74)

Although there are no randomized clinical trials showing benefit of surveillance in Crohn colitis, surveillance colonoscopy is recommended by many groups, usually for CD involving more than 1 segment of the colon and/or at least one-third of the colon. (1,46)

CD: Surgery and Pathologic Examination of Surgical Resection Specimen

The clinical course of CD is variable. A subset of patients experience intermittent attacks of mild or bloody diarrhea, fever, and abdominal pain similar to that seen in UC. Some may develop malabsorption, malnutrition, protein loss, and hypoalbuminemia secondary to small-bowel involvement. Crohn disease patients may develop intestinal complications requiring surgery; most of the patients undergo operation at least once, with variable indications including fistula formation, obstruction, mass/abscess formation, and medical intractability. (75,76) Forty-four percent undergo surgery in the first year of diagnosis, indicative of the aggressive clinical course in the initial phase of CD. By 10 years after diagnosis, 71% to 83% of the patients have undergone surgical intervention. (76,77) Ileal and ileocolonic CD and CD with perianal disease increase the probability for resection. (76,78,79)

About 70% and 30% of patients, respectively, experience endoscopic and clinical recurrence of CD 1 year after surgery, requiring reoperation in some patients. (80-83) Smoking, age of onset, sex, family history of CD, location and duration of CD, genetic factors, and the presence of fistula or perianal disease influence the development of postoperative recurrence. (75,83)

Crohn disease is characterized by segmental submucosal and mural inflammation and fibrosis. Therefore, the gross specimen tends to be rigid and maintains a tubular structure on the grossing table when opened (Figure 5, A). The bowel wall is usually thickened. Creeping serosal fat, fistula, stricture, and mucosal longitudinal linear ulcer with transverse ulcer (cobblestone appearance) may be seen. Microscopically, CD demonstrates transmural plasma cell-rich inflammation, transmural lymphoid aggregates, scarring of the submucosa, and hypertrophy and fibrosis of the muscularis propria (Figure 5, B). Neural hypertrophy is a common finding. The overlying mucosa may show chronic active/inactive enteritis with PGM and deep fissuring ulcers (Figure 5, C). Granulomas are seen in 30% to 60% of the resections (Figure 5, D). (84) The presence of characteristic histology in conjunction with clinical history is diagnostic of CD.

CD: Variant

Rarely, CD is clinically and/or serologically defined, but the histology resembles that of UC. (85-88) This variant, so called UC-like CD, or superficial CD, may be initially misclassified as UC and subsequently reclassified as CD after pouch complications. Fortunately, this variant is very rare, comprising only 1% of IBD. If unusual features for UC such as segmental disease, absolute skip lesions, granulomas in colectomy, or clinical perianal disease are noted in IBD that otherwise appears to be UC, this variant of CD needs to be suspected. (88)

James et al (89) evaluated 17 proctocolectomy specimens from patients who were reclassified as having CD after pouch complications (UC-like CD) in comparison with proctocolectomies from 18 UC patients without pouch complications. Compared with UC patients without pouch complications, the patients with UC-like CD were 13 years younger and tended to show more severe proximal disease, active ileitis, and appendicitis, with conspicuous neutrophils in the lamina propria. Typical Crohn granulomas and transmural inflammation away from ulcer were not identified in either group. Compared with classic CD patients, UC-like CD patients were younger, and left-sided colitis was more common. (86) Studies on pouch outcome in UC-like CD show conflicting results. (86-88) This may in part be due to the different criteria used for the diagnosis of UC-like CD, necessitating further study and standardization of the diagnostic criteria.


Indeterminate colitis (IC) poses a challenge to clinicians and pathologists. When strict diagnostic criteria are applied, the natural history and outcome of IC appear to be akin to those of UC.

Definition and Incidence

Indeterminate colitis refers to IBD, of which definitive diagnosis cannot be established in the colectomy specimen. (90) This is a provisional diagnosis for colectomy only. When mucosal biopsies with overlapping features of UC and CD are encountered, a diagnosis of IBD, unclassified, or of equivocal/ nonspecific IBD is recommended. (91) Indeterminate colitis comprises about 5% to 10% of IBD, and the most common scenario is fulminant colitis with CD-like features in IBD that otherwise appears to be UC, with severe ulcer, superficial fissure, transmural inflammation, and rarely lymphoid aggregates underneath the ulcer, and relative rectal sparing.

Most IC is classifiable if strict criteria are applied and atypical forms are recognized. Swan et al (59) reviewed 95 resection cases of fulminant IC. Of 67 cases with clinical follow-up, 61 cases (91%) were reclassified as either UC or CD. The most helpful and specific histologic features of CD were granulomas and lymphoid aggregates away from the ulcer. In another series, IC had an 80% probability of being reclassified as either UC or CD within 8 years. (92) The varying incidence of IC may partly be due to variable practice setting and availability of other pertinent data.

Clinical Relevance and Outcome

The distinction of UC and CD in fulminant colitis is clinically relevant. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir is offered to most UC patients, whereas it may be contraindicated in CD because of the high complication and pouch failure rate. Pouches in CD patients can be complicated by pouchitis, fistula formation, incontinence, and anastomotic leaks, with high morbidity. (93)

Several outcome studies suggested that most IC cases behave like UC. (88,91) Furthermore, the overall pouch failure rate in IC (20%) is closer to UC (10%) than to CD (30%-60%). Conversely, many presumed IC cases with severe pouch complications turn out to be CD. Therefore, it is generally accepted that IC is probably UC; thus, patients with IC should not be denied a restorative procedure if there is no convincing evidence of CD. (17,88,91) A recent microRNA study of IC provided direct molecular evidence that the mRNA profile of IC clustered with that of UC. (94)


There have been considerable controversies regarding terminology and management recommendations for IBD-related dysplasia. The Surveillance for Colorectal Endoscopic Neoplasia Detection and Management in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: International Consensus Recommendations consensus statement (95) endorsed updated recommendations in 2015. Recent studies on the natural history of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and indefinite for dysplasia (IND) supported that these pathologic diagnoses may potentially serve as a biomarker for IBD progression.


Dysplasia is the earliest visible biomarker for neoplastic progression in IBD. The classification system of Riddell et al (96) is used for histologic grading of dysplasia in the United States. This system consists of 4 categories--negative for dysplasia, IND, LGD, and high-grade dysplasia--with an overall fair and modest interobserver agreement for negative for dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia, and poorer agreement (higher variability) for LGD and IND. (97-99) The IND category is used when the epithelial changes cannot be classified as either negative or positive for dysplasia with certainty. For example, IND may be rendered when coexisting florid acute inflammation, lack of the surface epithelium for evaluation, or processing/technical issues preclude definitive assessment of the epithelial alterations. (17)

Dysplasia in IBD may be flat, depressed, or polypoid/ elevated endoscopically. The endoscopic appearance of dysplasia is clinically relevant because it determines endoscopic resectability and further management. Visibility does not necessarily translate into resectability. For example, a flat dysplastic lesion may be visible or invisible endoscopically; this usually indicates that it may be unresectable endoscopically. Polypoid/elevated lesions are usually visible, but may be endoscopically unresectable depending on the size and boundaries. With recent advancements in endoscopic technologies, most dysplasia in IBD is visible. (95)

In previous clinical practice, the terms adenoma-like and non-adenoma-like were used to imply endoscopic resectability by endoscopists. Similarly, in pathology practice, the terms adenoma-like dysplasia-associated mass or lesion and non-adenoma-like dysplasia-associated mass or lesion have been used. (46,100,101)

In the 2015 Surveillance for Colorectal Endoscopic Neoplasia Detection and Management in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: International Consensus Recommendations (SCENIC) statement, these terms were abandoned and more descriptive terms were recommended (Table). In the statement, the term endoscopically resectable indicates that the lesion has distinct margins and appears to be completely removed on visual inspection after endoscopic resection, histology confirms the complete removal of the lesion, and there is no dysplasia in the mucosa adjacent to the lesion. (95)

Management of Polypoid Dysplasia

Attempts have been made to distinguish IBD-related polypoid dysplasia (Figure 6, A and B) from sporadic adenoma based on clinical, pathologic, and molecular features. (100,102-104) However, from a management standpoint, this distinction may not be of significance, because polypoid dysplasia that is amenable to endoscopic resection is completely removed endoscopically regardless of the nature of the polyp. Confirmation of negative polypectomy margins and an absence of dysplasia in the adjacent flat mucosa are critical. Subsequent surveillance intervals may vary depending on the polyp size, appearance, and degree of fragmentation on retrieval. (95) Colectomy is not indicated for such lesions. (95)

Most of the data regarding natural history of polypoid dysplasia have been generated from UC patients. Comparable studies on CD are scarce, because surveillance colonoscopy is limited to patients with colonic involvement. (46) Quinn et al (101) evaluated outcomes of polypoid (adenoma-like) dysplasia in the colon in 50 patients with CD. The authors showed that polypectomy and continued surveillance may be a safe option regardless of the site of the dysplasia (within or outside the field of previous or concurrent colitis), similarly to UC.

Management of Nonpolypoid Dysplasia

Traditionally, colectomy has been performed for invisible high-grade dysplasia in flat mucosa (Figure 6, C) because of high risk of synchronous colorectal carcinoma and progressive disease. (46,105) The management for invisible LGD, which may resemble colonic tubular adenoma (Figure 6, D), or LGD with unusual morphology such as hypermucinous, traditional serrated adenoma-like, and eosinophilic LGD with few goblet cells (Figure 7, A through C) has been a matter of debate. A meta-analysis study reported that 22% of invisible LGD harbored synchronous colorectal carcinoma on immediate colectomy. (106) However, emerging evidence suggests that, using more advanced technology such as chromoendoscopy or high-definition white-light colonoscopy, about 90% of dysplasia in IBD is indeed visible. (95) Therefore, the 2015 SCENIC consensus recommends that patients with endoscopically invisible dysplasia--biopsies with unexpected dysplasia that was not visible on endoscopy--that is confirmed by a GI pathologist should be referred to an endoscopist with expertise in IBD surveillance using chromoendoscopy with high-definition colonoscopy. If the dysplasia becomes visible on repeat higher-resolution endoscopy, and is deemed amenable to endoscopic resection, complete endoscopic resection followed by surveillance may be offered (see below). If the dysplasia remains invisible despite use of the newer technique by IBD experts, the decision to undergo colectomy versus continued surveillance in these patients should be individualized. (95)

For nonpolypoid dysplasia that is visible and endoscopically resectable, complete endoscopic resection and surveillance colonoscopy is recommended by the 2015 SCENIC consensus. (95) However, this recommendation is conditional with a lesser degree of agreement among the panelists, because the possibility that nonpolypoid dysplasia may carry a higher risk of colorectal cancer than polypoid dysplasia is acknowledged. (95) Other recent guidelines have suggested colectomy for such lesions given the difficulty in achieving complete endoscopic resection. (46)

Natural History of LGD and IND

There are conflicting study results regarding the risk of neoplastic progression of LGD, and little is known about its natural history. (46) In a recent prospective study of LGD in UC, 42 patients with LGD were followed with intensive surveillance. Eight patients (19%) progressed to higher-grade lesion, whereas 27 (64%) regressed and 7 (17%) had persistent LGD during 4-year follow-up. This study also showed that patients with 3 or more LGD at a single colonoscopy were at increased risk for progression. (107)

A few recent outcome studies addressed the natural history of IND. The authors reported a progression to a higher-grade lesion in 15% (13 of 84) and 25% (18 of 71) during the mean follow-up of 28 and 99 months, respectively, supporting that IND is a biomarker for neoplastic progression, thus warranting close follow-up in a subset of patients. (46,108,109)

Unconventional Precursor Lesions

Although uncommon, serrated lesions resembling conventional hyperplastic polyp or sessile serrated polyp may be detected in IBD patients (Figure 7, D). Serrated lesions may be associated with neoplastic progression in IBD; some have been reported to be associated with invasive adenocarcinoma. (110) However, data are limited and further investigation is needed for characterization. (95,110-112) Patients with sessile serrated polyp-like lesions in the diseased colon should have repeat colonoscopy in 1 year following complete removal of the lesion (W. E. Jackson et al, unpublished data, 2015). In addition, villous hypermucinous mucosa harboring K-RAS mutation and very well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with low-grade dysplastic precursor lesions have been described in IBD. (113,114) Thus, this type of epithelial change poses great diagnostic challenges to practicing pathologists. In such cases, consultation from GI pathologists with extensive experience may be helpful.

Pathologic Characteristics of IBD-Associated Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Pathologic differences of adenocarcinomas arising in association with IBD compared with sporadic colorectal adenocarcinoma (CAC) have been reported. Synchronous carcinomas are common (20%-27%) in IBD-associated carcinoma. (115-119) There are conflicting reports as to whether the IBD-associated CACs are evenly distributed or less frequent in the right colon. (115,119,120) Microscopically, mucinous and signet-ring cell carcinomas are overrepresented in IBD. (119,121,122) Also, IBD-associated carcinomas may show features of microsatellite instability-high tumors, such as Crohnlike lymphoid reaction, lack of tumor necrosis, and heterogeneity in histology; however, this resemblance is independent of microsatellite instability status. (119) A subset of IBD-associated CACs is very well differentiated with bland cytology and inconspicuous desmoplasia, without obvious high-grade dysplastic precursors. (114,120) The incidence of low-stage CAC (stage I-II) in IBD patients appears to be on the rise, possibly because of increased surveillance. (120)


Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir formation is the procedure of choice for UC and familial adenomatous polyposis. Pouchitis is an idiopathic inflammatory condition of the pouch, and is the most common pouch complication in UC, but is rare in familial adenomatous polyposis. The cumulative incidence of pouchitis in UC is reported to be up to 50%. Chronic antibiotics-refractory pouchitis is one of the causes of pouch failure. (123-125) Variable histologic features were postulated to predict development of pouchitis, such as backwash ileitis, pancolitis, duodenitis, and appendiceal inflammation and ulcer, with conflicting results. (61,64,65,126)

The Pouchitis Disease Activity Index score (127) and St. Mark's Hospital criteria (128) are available for the diagnosis of pouchitis, and the latter is being used in the United Kingdom. However, there are no standardized or widely used criteria in clinical practice in the United States. Rather, the diagnosis of pouchitis is rendered by a combination of clinical presentation, nutritional status, involvement of small bowel and upper GI tract, endoscopic findings, and pathology. (123,124) The correlations between clinical symptoms and endoscopic and histologic features are poor. (124)

Histologic findings aid in the differential diagnosis of pouchitis, prepouch ileitis, cuffitis, CD, dysplasia, and cancer. Endoscopic biopsies usually consist of samples from the prepouch ileum, pouch mucosa, and anal canal (rectal) cuff, which are most often submitted separately. Documenting the degree of mucosal inflammation, PGM, presence of granuloma, and viral inclusions and the presence of dysplasia or neoplasia is informative. Of note, finding of granuloma, PGM, or fistula in pouch biopsy does not necessarily equate with CD. (129)


Inflammatory bowel disease in PSC patients appears to represent a distinct subgroup with clinicopathologic characteristics that are different from those of IBD without PSC. Inflammatory bowel disease associated with PSC confers a significantly higher risk for colorectal cancer, requiring surveillance colonoscopy at diagnosis.

Prevalence and Phenotype

The prevalence of IBD in PSC is as high as 60% to 80% in Western countries, of which 80% of cases are UC, 10% are CD, and the remainder are IC. On the other hand, 2% to 7.5% of IBD patients develop PSC. (130,131) The association between PSC and IBD appears to be less strong in Eastern countries, with reported prevalence of IBD in 20% to 32% of PSC patients. (130)

According to the population-based cohort study of 579 PSC patients performed in the Netherlands, 207 of 287 PSC-UC patients (83%) had pancolitis (E3), whereas 32 (13%) had left-sided colitis (E2), and 9 (4%) had proctitis (E1). Among 78 PSC-CD patients, 53 (72%) had colitis (L2), whereas 17 (23%) had ileocolonic (L3) and only 4 (5%) had ileal CD (L1). (132) This study validates previous reports that IBD in association with PSC tends to present with extensive colon involvement, representing a distinct phenotype. (133-137)

Clinicopathologic Characteristics

Several studies reported clinicopathologic differences of PSC-IBD compared with IBD without PSC, including a higher frequency of rectal sparing, backwash ileitis, and heavier inflammation in the right colon, albeit milder degree of overall activity. (133,137-139) In the report of Sano et al, (138) 11 (55%) of 20 PSC-IBD patients showed right-sided colitis on colonoscopy, and 13 (87%) of 15 showed right-side-predominant inflammation on histologic examination. On the other hand, some authors reported tendency for pancolitis in PSC-UC, and no statistically significant difference in the frequency of rectal sparing and backwash ileitis, using stricter histologic definitions. (134) In keeping with recent findings, (134) one population-based cohort study reported that backwash ileitis and rectal sparing were rare in PSC-UC. (132)

These discrepancies may be due to study population, geographical location, disease presentation, and definition of pancolitis, backwash ileitis, and rectal sparing. For example, colitis preceding PSC showed a higher frequency of pancolitis whereas IBD following PSC showed a predilection for right-sided colitis. (139) Clinically, findings of endoscopic relative or absolute rectal sparing and predominance of inflammation in the right colon in patients with multifocal biliary stenosis on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography may be supportive of PSC diagnosis, negating the need for invasive procedure such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. (130)

Cancer Risk and Surveillance

Patients with PSC-IBD have a 4- to 10-fold increased risk for CAC compared with patients with UC without PSC. (46,132) The risk of developing CAC is 3 times higher than that of cholangiocarcinoma. (139) In PSC-IBD patients, CAC is diagnosed at younger age, is more common in the right colon, and tends to be of advanced stage at detection. (140-142) Liver transplantation does not appear to reduce either CAC risk or disease activity in this population. (137,143) Therefore, IBD patients with concurrent PSC are subject to immediate annual surveillance colonoscopy and biopsy of the entire colon. (46,142)


The incidence and prevalence of IBD in Asia have risen in the last 3 to 4 decades, though they are still lower in Asia than in the West. (144) Inflammatory bowel disease is also common in Asian immigrants living in Western countries, indicative of the role of environmental factors. (145-147) Ulcerative colitis is more common than CD in Asia; however, the rise of incidence is more rapid for CD than for UC. (144) Family history of IBD is less frequent among IBD patients in Asia. The median age of onset is similar to that in the West; however, unlike the well-established bimodal age of onset in the West, the second peak is either indistinct or smaller at a younger age. (144-147)

UC in Asia

The incidence of UC in Asian regions is estimated to be 0.4 to 2.1 per 100 000 population (North America and North Europe: 6-20.3 per 100 000 population), and the prevalence rate is 6 to 30 per 100 000 population (North America and North Europe: 21.4 to 243 per 100 000 population). (146) Ulcerative colitis in Asia appears to show overall equal gender distribution. The prevalence of extraintestinal manifestations is lower compared with the West. (144-146) Most hospital-based cohort studies reported comparable proportions of each phenotype (E1 30%-60%, E2 16%-40%, E3 18%-35%) compared with the West. (144,146,148,149) The disease course appears to be milder, resulting in less surgery. (144-146) Colorectal cancer risk has not been well established, probably because of relatively short follow-up. Nevertheless, the cumulative risk of colorectal carcinoma in Asian UC patients appears comparable with that of the West. (144,145)

CD in Asia

The incidence of CD in the Asia-Pacific region is about 1.37 per 100 000. (150) The major difference is a male predilection in Asia compared with the Western population, in which studies show equal gender distribution or a slight female predominance. (144,145,147) The prevalence of extraintestinal manifestations is comparable with that in the Western population. (144,147) As in the West, smoking is positively associated with CD in Asia. Smoking may be a predictor of surgery and hospitalization outcomes, and cessation of smoking reduces disease progression. (145,148)

Published studies report a variable predominance of phenotype in CD; nonetheless, the ileocolonic (L3) phenotype appears to be the most common in Asia. (145,147) Noncomplicated behavior (B1; nonstricturing, nonpenetrating) is the most frequent, comprising 40% to 69% of CD, followed by B2 (structuring; 20%-28%), and B3 (penetrating; 10%-31%). (144) A small number of studies reported a higher frequency of perianal disease at diagnosis (33%-37%) compared with the West (11%-27%). (151) The natural history appears to be similar to that in the West, with a comparable cumulative surgical resection rate. (144,145)

Pertinent and important differential diagnosis of CD in Asia includes ITB and Behcet disease. Both are prevalent in Asia and demonstrate overlapping clinical, radiologic, endoscopic, and histologic features with CD. (147) Histologically, granulomas in ITB tend to be multiple, large, and confluent, often with caseous necrosis. In contrast, granulomas of CD are infrequent and small. Mucosal granulomas are common in both; however, submucosal granulomas are more common in ITB. Disproportionate submucosal inflammation and ulcers that are lined by epithelioid histiocytes are frequently observed in ITB. (152) In addition, an endoscopic scoring system to distinguish ITB and CD has been developed. In this study, anorectal lesions, longitudinal ulcers, aphthous ulcers, and a cobblestone appearance were significantly more common in CD, whereas involvement of fewer than 4 segments, a patulous ileocecal valve, transverse ulcers, and scars or pseudopolyps were common in ITB. (153) Recent studies incorporated the findings of computed tomography enterography such as intestinal fistulas, target signs, comb signs--a prominence of vasa recta in the mesentery--and lymph node enhancement, and showed an improved diagnostic accuracy. (154)

Behcet disease is an idiopathic systemic vasculitis. Intestinal involvement is reported in 3% to 60% of Behcet disease, of which ileocecal involvement is the most common. Intestinal Behcet disease may be complicated by perforation, fistula, and stricture resembling CD. (155) Lee et al (156) and Li et al (157) evaluated endoscopic features to distinguish intestinal Behcet disease versus CD. Round ulcers in a focal distribution, large ulcers, the absence of aphthous ulcer, and cobblestone appearance were features in favor of Behcet disease, whereas CD tended to show irregular/geographic or longitudinal ulcers in segmental or diffuse distribution as well as pseudopolyps. In a study of 50 patients with intestinal Behcet disease, 9 cases had endoscopically evident ileal ulcers and 32 cases showed histologic ileal abnormalities, which included chronic ileitis (10), active ileitis (1), eosinophilic ileitis (1), amebiasis (2), nonspecific ileitis (12), and villous blunting (1). Vasculitis was detected in only 5 ileal mucosal biopsies (10%) in patients with Behcet disease. (158) Clinical and endoscopic correlation is essential to distinguish CD from Behcet disease.


Pathologic evaluation plays an essential role in the diagnosis and management of patients with IBD, and histologic findings should be interpreted in the clinical context. Knowledge of the clinical and surgical aspects of IBD, recognition of the main differential diagnoses and variant forms, and communication with clinicians are indispensable for optimal patient care. Understanding the clinical characteristics of IBD in Asia will not only help patient care but also foster the sharing of knowledge between the IBD communities of the West and the East.

Dr Lee would like to thank David M. Jones, MD, for his mentorship and showing her a simple way of examining resection specimens for IBD.


(1.) Shergill AK, Lightdale JR, Bruining DH, et al. The role of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81(5):1101-1121.

(2.) Mowat C, Cole A, Windsor A, et al. Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut. 2011; 60(5):571-607.

(3.) Sharaf RN, Shergill AK, Odze RD, et al. Endoscopic mucosal tissue sampling. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 78(2):216-224.

(4.) Leighton JA, Shen B, Baron TH, et al. ASGE guideline: endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63(4):558-565.

(5.) Gramlich TL, Petras RE. Small intestine. In: Mills SE, ed. Histology for Pathologists. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:601-626.

(6.) Dahl J, Greenson JK. Colon. In: Mills SE, ed. Histology for Pathologists. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:627-648.

(7.) Lee FD. Pyloric metaplasia in the small intestine. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1964; 87:267-277.

(8.) Liber AF. Aberrant pyloric glands in regional ileitis. AMA Arch Pathol. 1951; 51(2):205-212.

(9.) Montgomery EA, Voltaggio L. Colon. In: Non-Neoplastic. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012:165-245. Biopsy Interpretation of the Gastrointestinal Tract Mucosa; vol 1. 2nd ed.

(10.) Ming SC, Simon M, Tandon BN. Gross gastric metaplasia of ileum after regional enteritis. Gastroenterology. 1963; 44(1):63-68.

(11.) Goldstein N, Dulai M. Contemporary morphologic definition of backwash ileitis in ulcerative colitis and features that distinguish it from Crohn disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006; 126(3):365-376.

(12.) Glickman JN, Bousvaros A, Farraye FA, et al. Pediatric patients with untreated ulcerative colitis may present initially with unusual morphologic findings. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28(2):190-197.

(13.) Annunziata ML, Caviglia R, Papparella LG, Cicala M. Upper gastrointestinal involvement of Crohn's disease: a prospective study on the role of upper endoscopy in the diagnostic work-up. Dig Dis Sci. 2012; 57(6):1618-1623.

(14.) Sutton LM, Heintz DD, Patel AS, Weinberg AG. Lymphocytic esophagitis in children. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014; 20(8):1324-1328.

(15.) Kakar S, Nehra V, Murray JA, Dayharsh GA, Burgart LJ. Significance of intraepithelial lymphocytosis in small bowel biopsy samples with normal mucosal architecture. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98(9):2027-2033.

(16.) Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J, et al. The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis. 2010; 4(1):7-27.

(17.) DeRoche TC, Xiao SY, Liu X. Histologic evaluation in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2014; 2(3):178-192.

(18.) Selbst MK, Ahrens WA, Robert ME, Friedman A, Proctor DD, Jain D. Spectrum of histologic changes in colonic biopsies in patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Mod Pathol. 2009; 22(6):737-743.

(19.) Lee S, de Boer WB, Subramaniam K, Kumarasinghe MP. Pointers and pitfalls of mycophenolate-associated colitis. J Clin Pathol. 2013; 66(1):8-11.

(20.) Alkim H, Ayaz S, Alkim C, Ulker A, Sahin B. Continuous active state of coagulation system in patients with nonthrombotic inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2011; 17(6):600-604.

(21.) Kaplan GG, Lim A, Seow CH, et al. Colectomy is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(4): 1251-1260.

(22.) Makapugay LM, Dean PJ. Diverticular disease-associated chronic colitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996; 20(1):94-102.

(23.) Ayata G, Ithamukkala S, Sapp H, et al. Prevalence and significance of inflammatory bowel disease-like morphologic features in collagenous and lymphocytic colitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26(11):1414-1423.

(24.) Langer C, Aust D, Ensari A, et al. Histology of microscopic colitis-review with a practical approach for pathologists. Histopathology. 2015; 66(5): 613-626.

(25.) Geboes K. Lymphocytic collagenous and other microscopic colitides: pathology and the relationship with idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2008; 32(8-9):689-694.

(26.) Goldstein NS, Gyorfi T. Focal lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis: patterns of Crohn's colitis? Am J Surg Pathol. 1999; 23(9):1075-1081.

(27.) Cerilli LA, Greenson JK. The differential diagnosis of colitis in endoscopic biopsy specimens: a review article. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012; 136(8):854-864.

(28.) Nostrant TT, Kumar NB, Appelman HD. Histopathology differentiates acute self-limited colitis from ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1987; 92(2): 318-328.

(29.) Kambham N, Vij R, Cartwright CA, Longacre T. Cytomegalovirus infection in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a case-control study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28(3):365-373.

(30.) Riley SA, Mani V, Goodman MJ, Dutt S, Herd ME. Microscopic activity in ulcerative colitis: what does it mean? Gut. 1991; 32(2):174-1 78.

(31.) Geboes K, Riddell R, Ost A, Jensfelt B, Persson T, Lofberg R. A reproducible grading scale for histological assessment of inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2000; 47(3):404-409.

(32.) Mazzuoli S, Guglielmi FW, Antonelli E, Salemme M, Bassotti G, Villanacci V. Definition and evaluation of mucosal healing in clinical practice. Dig Liv Dis. 2013; 45(12):969-977.

(33.) Lemmens B, Arijs I, Van Assche G, et al. Correlation between the endoscopic and histologic score in assessing the activity of ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013; 19(6):1194-1201.

(34.) Pineton de Chambrun G, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Lemann M, Colombel JF. Clinical implications of mucosal healing for the management of IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 7(1):15-29.

(35.) Fiorino G, Cesarini M, Indriolo A, Malesci A. Mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis: where do we stand? Curr Drug Targets. 2011; 12(10): 1417-1423.

(36.) Papi C, Fasci-Spurio F, Rogai F, Settesoldi A, Margagnoni G, Annese V. Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: treatment efficacy and predictive factors. Dig Liver Dis. 2013; 45(12):978-985.

(37.) Villanacci V, Antonelli E, Geboes K, Casella G, Bassotti G. Histological healing in inflammatory bowel disease: a still unfulfilled promise. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19(7):968-978.

(38.) Bryant RV, Burger DC, DeloJ, et al. Beyond endoscopic mucosal healing in UC: histological remission better predicts corticosteroid use and hospitalisation over 6years of follow-up. Gut. 2016; 65(3):408-414.

(39.) Rubin DT, Huo D, Kinnucan JA, et al. Inflammation is an independent risk factor for colonic neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis: a case-controls study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 11(12):1601-1608.

(40.) Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Ahmad T, et al. Toward an integrated clinical, molecular and serological classification of inflammatory bowel disease: report of a Working Party of the 2005 Montreal World Congress of Gastroenterology. Can J Gastroenterol. 2005; 19(suppl A):5A-36A.

(41.) Langholz E, Munkholm P, Nielsen OH, KreinerS, Binder V. Incidence and prevalence of ulcerative colitis in Copenhagen county from 1962 to 1987. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1991; 26(12):1247-1256.

(42.) Langholz E, Munkholm P, Davidsen M, Nielsen OH, Binder V. Changes in extent of ulcerative colitis: a study on the course and prognostic factors. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996; 31(3):260-266.

(43.) Solberg IC, Lygren I, Jahnsen J, et al. Clinical course during the first 10 years of ulcerative colitis: results from a population-based inception cohort (IBSEN Study). Scand I Gastroenterol. 2009; 44(4):431-440.

(44.) Eaden JA, Abrams KR, Mayberry JF. The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2001; 48(4):526-535.

(45.) Jess T, Simonsen J, Jorgensen KT, Pedersen BV, Nielsen NM, Frisch M. Decreasing risk of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 30 years. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143(2):375-381.

(46.) Farraye FA, Odze RD, Eaden J, Itzkowitz SH. AGA technical review on the diagnosis and management of colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2010; 138(2):746-774.

(47.) Langholz E, Munkholm P, Davidsen M, Binder V. Course of ulcerative colitis: analysis of changes in disease activity over years. Gastroenterology. 1994; 107(1):3-11.

(48.) Langholz E, Munkholm P, Davidsen M, Binder V. Colorectal cancer risk and mortality in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1992; 103(5): 1444-1451.

(49.) CohenJL, Strong SA, Hyman NH, et al. Practice parameters for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48(11):1997-2009.

(50.) Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. One-stage restorative proctocolectomy without temporary ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: a note of caution. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997; 40(9):1019-1022.

(51.) Ordas I, Eckmann L, Talamini M, Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 2012; 380(9853):1606-1619.

(52.) Park SH, Loftus EV Jr, Yang SK. Appendiceal skip inflammation and ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2014; 59(9):2050-2057.

(53.) Mutinga ML, Odze RD, Wang HH, HornickJL, Farraye FA. The clinical significance of right-sided colonic inflammation in patients with left-sided chronic ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004; 10(3):215-219.

(54.) Groisman GM, George J, Harpaz N. Ulcerative appendicitis in universal and nonuniversal ulcerative colitis. Mod Pathol. 1994; 7(3):322-325.

(55.) Perry WB, Opelka FG, Smith D, et al. Discontinuous appendiceal involvement in ulcerative colitis: pathology and clinical correlation. J GastrointestSurg. 1999; 3(2):141-144.

(56.) Kroft SH, Stryker SJ, Rao MS. Appendiceal involvement as a skip lesion in ulcerative colitis. Mod Pathol. 1994; 7(9):912-914.

(57.) Matsumoto T, Nakamura S, Shimizu M, Iida M. Significance of appendiceal involvement in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55(2):180-185.

(58.) Ladefoged K, Munck LK, Jorgensen F, Engel P. Skip inflammation of the appendiceal orifice: a prospective endoscopic study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005; 40(10):1192-1196.

(59.) Swan NC, Geoghegan JG, O'Donoghue DP, Hyland JM, Sheahan K. Fulminant colitis in inflammatory bowel disease: detailed pathologic and clinical analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998; 41(12):1511-1515.

(60.) Joo M, Odze RD. Rectal sparing and skip lesions in ulcerative colitis: a comparative study of endoscopic and histologic findings in patients who underwent proctocolectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010; 34(5):689-696.

(61.) Lin J, McKenna BJ, Appelman HD. Morphologic findings in upper gastrointestinal biopsies of patients with ulcerative colitis: a controlled study. Am i Surg Pathol. 2010; 34(11):1672-1677.

(62.) Hong CH, Park DI, Choi WH, et al. The clinical usefulness of focally enhanced gastritis in Korean patients with Crohn's disease [in Korean]. Korean j Gastroenterol. 2009; 53(1):23-28.

(63.) Haskell H, Andrews CW Jr, Reddy SI, et al. Pathologic features and clinical significance of "backwash" ileitis in ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005; 29(11):1472-1481.

(64.) Arrossi AV, Kariv Y, Bronner MP, et al. Backwash ileitis does not affect pouch outcome in patients with ulcerative colitis with restorative proctocolectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 9(11):981-988.

(65.) Yantiss RK, Sapp HL, Farraye FA, et al. Histologic predictors of pouchitis in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28(8):999-1006.

(66.) Thia KT, Sandborn WJ, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Loftus EV Jr. Risk factors associated with progression to intestinal complications of Crohn's disease in a population-based cohort. Gastroenterology. 2010; 139(4):1147-1155.

(67.) Tarrant KM, Barclay ML, Frampton CM, Gearry RB. Perianal disease predicts changes in Crohn's disease phenotype--results of a population-based study of inflammatory bowel disease phenotype. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103(12):3082-3093.

(68.) Sjoberg D, Holmstrom T, Larsson M, et al. Incidence and clinical course of Crohn's disease during the first year--results from the IBD Cohort of the Uppsala Region (ICURE) of Sweden 2005-2009. J Crohns Colitis. 2014; 8(3):215-222.

(69.) Wolters FL, Russel MG, Sijbrandij J, et al. Phenotype at diagnosis predicts recurrence rates in Crohn's disease. Gut. 2006; 55(8):1124-1130.

(70.) CosnesJ, Cattan S, Blain A, et al. Long-term evolution of disease behavior of Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002; 8(4):244-250.

(71.) Louis E, Collard A, Oger AF, et al. Behaviour of Crohn's disease according to the Vienna classification: changing pattern over the course of the disease. Gut. 2001; 49(6):777-782.

(72.) Ekbom A, Helmick C, Zack M, Adami HO. Increased risk of large-bowel cancer in Crohn's disease with colonic involvement. Lancet. 1990; 336(8711): 357-359.

(73.) Jess T, Gamborg M, Matzen P, Munkholm P, S0rensen TI. Increased risk of intestinal cancer in Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100(12):2724-2729.

(74.) Thomas M, Bienkowski R, Vandermeer TJ, Trostle D, Cagir B. Malignant transformation in perianal fistulas of Crohn's disease: a systematic review of literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010; 14(1):66-73.

(75.) Caprilli R, Gassull MA, Escher JC, et al. European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: special situations. Gut. 2006; 55(suppl 1):i36-i58.

(76.) Bernell O, Lapidus A, Hellers G. Risk factors for surgery and postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease. Ann Surg. 2000; 231(1):38-45.

(77.) Bernell O, Lapidus A, Hellers G. Risk factors for surgery and recurrence in 907 patients with primary ileocaecal Crohn's disease. Br J Surg. 2000; 87(12): 1697-1701.

(78.) Basilisco G, Campanini M, Cesana B, Ranzi T, Bianchi P. Risk factors for first operation in Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989; 84(7):749-752.

(79.) Heimann TM, Greenstein AJ, Lewis B, Kaufman D, Heimann DM, Aufses AH Jr. Comparison of primary and reoperative surgery in patients with Crohns disease. Ann Surg. 1998; 227(4):492-495.

(80.) Whelan G, Farmer RG, Fazio VW, Goormastic M. Recurrence after surgery in Crohn's disease: relationship to location of disease (clinical pattern) and surgical indication. Gastroenterology. 1985; 88(6):1826-1833.

(81.) Rutgeerts P. Protagonist: Crohn's disease recurrence can be prevented after ileal resection. Gut. 2002; 51(2):152-153.

(82.) Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G, Kerremans R, Coenegrachts JL, Coremans G. Natural history of recurrent Crohn's disease at the ileocolonic anastomosis after curative surgery. Gut. 1984; 25(6):665-672.

(83.) Nos P, Domenech E. Postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence: a practical approach. World J Gastroenterol. 2008; 14(36):5540-5548.

(84.) Denoya P, Canedo J, Berho M, et al. Granulomas in Crohn's disease: does progression through the bowel layers affect presentation or predict recurrence? Colorectal Dis. 2011; 13(10):1142-1147.

(85.) McQuillan AC, Appelman HD. Superficial Crohn's disease: a study of 10 patients. Surg Pathol. 1989; 2:231-239.

(86.) Soucy G, Wang HH, Farraye FA, et al. Clinical and pathological analysis of colonic Crohn's disease, including a subgroup with ulcerative colitis-like features. Mod Pathol. 2012; 25(2):295-307.

(87.) Morpurgo E, Petras R, Kimberling J, Ziegler C, Galandiuk S. Characterization and clinical behavior of Crohn's disease initially presenting predominantly as colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46(7):918-924.

(88.) Odze RD. A contemporary and critical appraisal of "indeterminate colitis." Mod Pathol. 2015; 28(suppl 1):S30-S46.

(89.) James SD, Wise PE, Zuluaga-Toro T, Schwartz DA, Washington MK, Shi C. Identification of pathologic features associated with "ulcerative colitis-like" Crohn's disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(36):13139-13145.

(90.) Guindi M, Riddell RH. Indeterminate colitis. J Clin Pathol. 2004; 57(12): 1233-1244.

(91.) Martland GT, Shepherd NA. Indeterminate colitis: definition, diagnosis, implications and a plea for nosological sanity. Histopathology. 2007; 50(1):83-96.

(92.) Meucci G, Bortoli A, Riccioli FA, et al. Frequency and clinical evolution of indeterminate colitis: a retrospective multi-centre study in northern Italy: GSMII (Gruppo di Studio per le Malattie Infiammatorie Intestinali). Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999; 11(8):909-913.

(93.) McIntyre PB, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Dozois RR, Beart RW Jr. Indeterminate colitis: long-term outcome in patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995; 38(1):51-54.

(94.) Lin J, Cao Q, Zhang J, et al. MicroRNA expression patterns in indeterminate inflammatory bowel disease. Mod Pathol. 2013; 26(1):148-154.

(95.) Laine L, Kaltenbach T, Barkun A, et al. SCENIC international consensus statement on surveillance and management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2015; 148(3):639-651.

(96.) Riddell RH, Goldman H, Ransohoff DF, et al. Dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: standardized classification with provisional clinical applications. Hum Pathol. 1983; 14(11):931-968.

(97.) Odze RD, Goldblum J, Noffsinger A, Alsaigh N, Rybicki LA, Fogt F. Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis-associated dysplasia by telepathology. Mod Pathol. 2002; 15(4):379-386.

(98.) Eaden J, Abrams K, McKay H, Denley H, Mayberry J. Inter-observer variation between general and specialist gastrointestinal pathologists when grading dysplasia in ulcerative colitis. J Pathol. 2001; 94(2):152-157.

(99.) Allende D, Elmessiry M, Hao W, et al. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability in the diagnosis of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: correlation of pathological and endoscopic findings. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 16(9):710-718.

(100.) Odze RD. Adenomas and adenoma-like DALMs in chronic ulcerative colitis: a clinical, pathological, and molecular review. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94(7):1746-1750.

(101.) Quinn AM, Farraye FA, Naini BV, et al. Polypectomy is adequate treatment for adenoma-like dysplastic lesions (DALMs) in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013; 19(6):1186-1193.

(102.) Odze RD, Brown CA, Hartmann CJ, Noffsinger AE, Fogt F. Genetic alterations in chronic ulcerative colitis-associated adenoma-like DALMs are similar to non-colitic sporadic adenomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000; 24(9):1209-1216.

(103.) Torres C, Antonioli D, Odze RD. Polypoid dysplasia and adenomas in inflammatory bowel disease: a clinical, pathologic, and follow-up study of 89 polyps from 59 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998; 22(3):275-284.

(104.) Gui X, Liu S, Yan Y, Gao Z. Neurotensin receptor 1 overexpression in inflammatory bowel diseases and colitis-associated neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19(28):4504-4510.

(105.) Rutter MD, Saunders BP, Wilkinson KH, et al. Thirty-year analysis of a colonoscopic surveillance program for neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2006; 130(4):1030-1038.

(106.) Thomas T, Abrams KA, Robinson RJ, Mayberry JF. Meta-analysis: cancer risk of low-grade dysplasia in chronic ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 25(6):657-668.

(107.) Zisman TL, Bronner MP, Rulyak S, et al. Prospective study of the progression of low-grade dysplasia in ulcerative colitis using current cancer surveillance guidelines. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012; 18(12):2240-2246.

(108.) Lai KK, Horvath B, Xie H, et al. Risk for colorectal neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and mucosa indefinite for dysplasia. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015; 21(2):378-384.

(109.) Choi WT, Rabinovitch PS, Wang D, Westerhoff M. Outcome of "indefinite for dysplasia" in inflammatory bowel disease: correlation with DNA flow cytometry and other risk factors of colorectal cancer. Hum Pathol. 2015; 46(7):939-947.

(110.) Srivastava A, Redston M, Farraye FA, Yantiss RK, Odze RD. Hyperplastic/ serrated polyposis in inflammatory bowel disease: a case series of a previously undescribed entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008; 32(2):296-303.

(111.) Rubio CA, Befrits R, Jaramillo E, Nesi G, Amorosi A. Villous and serrated adenomatous growth bordering carcinomas in inflammatory bowel disease. Anticancer Res. 2000; 20(6C):4761-4764.

(112.) Johnson DH, Khanna S, Smyrk TC, et al. Detection rate and outcome of colonic serrated epithelial changes in patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 39(12):1408-1417.

(113.) Andersen SN, Lovig T, Clausen OP, Bakka A, Fausa O, Rognum TO. Villous, hypermucinous mucosa in long standing ulcerative colitis shows high frequency of K-ras mutations. Gut. 1999; 45(5):686-692.

(114.) Levi GS, Harpaz N. Intestinal low-grade tubuloglandular adenocarcinoma in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006; 30(8):1022-1029.

(115.) Delaunoit T, Limburg PJ, Goldberg RM, LympJF, Loftus EVJr. Colorectal cancer prognosis among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 4(3):335-342.

(116.) Sugita A, Greenstein AJ, Ribeiro MB, et al. Survival with colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a study of 102 cases. Ann Surg. 1993; 218(2):189-195.

(117.) Sjodahl RI, Myrelid P, Soderholm JD. Anal and rectal cancer in Crohn's disease. Colorectal Dis. 2003; 5(5):490-495.

(118.) Stahl TJ, Schoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL, et al. Crohn's disease and carcinoma: increasing justification for surveillance? Dis Colon Rectum. 1992; 35(9):850-856.

(119.) Liu X, Goldblum JR, Zhao Z, et al. Distinct clinicohistologic features of inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal adenocarcinoma: in comparison with sporadic microsatellite-stable and Lynch syndrome-related colorectal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012; 36(8):1228-1233.

(120.) Bressenot A, Cahn V, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Microscopic features of colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(12):3164-3172.

(121.) Judge TA, Lewis JD, Lichtenstein GR. Colonic dysplasia and cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002; 12(3):495-523.

(122.) Harpaz N, Talbot IC. Colorectal cancer in idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1996; 13(4):339-357.

(123.) Shen B, Lashner BA. Diagnosis and treatment of pouchitis. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 4(5):355-361.

(124.) Royston DJ, Warren BF. Are we reporting ileal pouch biopsies correctly? Colorectal Dis. 2011; 13(11):1285-1289.

(125.) Landy J, Al-Hassi HO, McLaughlin SD, et al. Etiology of pouchitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012; 18(6):1146-1155.

(126.) Nasseri Y, Melmed G, Wang HL, Targan S, Fleshner P. Rigorous histopathological assessment of the colectomy specimen in patients with inflammatory bowel disease unclassified does not predict outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105(1):155-161.

(127.) Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Batts KP, Pemberton JH, Phillips SF. Pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a pouchitis disease activity index. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994; 69(5):409-415.

(128.) Moskowitz RL, Shepherd NA, Nicholls RJ. An assessment of inflammation in the reservoir after restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal ileal reservoir. IntJ Colorectal Dis. 1986; 1(3):167-174.

(129.) Kariv R, Plesec TP, Gaffney K, et al. Pyloric gland metaplasia and pouchitis in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomoses. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010; 31(8):862-873.

(130.) Nakazawa T, Naitoh I, Hayashi K, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a distinct entity? World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(12):3245-3254.

(131.) Eaton JE, TalwalkarJA, Lazaridis KN, Gores GJ, Lindor KD. Pathogenesis of primary sclerosing cholangitis and advances in diagnosis and management. Gastroenterology. 2013; 145(3):521-536.

(132.) Boonstra K, van Erpecum KJ, van Nieuwkerk KM, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with a distinct phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012; 18(12):2270-2276.

(133.) Loftus EVJr, Harewood GC, Loftus CG, et al. PSC-IBD: a unique form of inflammatory bowel disease associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut. 2005; 54(1):91-96.

(134.) Joo M, Abreu-e-Lima P, Farraye F, et al. Pathologic features of ulcerative colitis in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case-control study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009; 33(6):854-862.

(135.) Lundqvist K, Broome U. Differences in colonic disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis with and without primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997; 40(4):451-456.

(136.) Sokol H, Cosnes J, Chazouilleres O, et al. Disease activity and cancer risk in inflammatory bowel disease associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2008; 14(22):3497-3503.

(137.) Jorgensen KK, Grzyb K, Lundin KE, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: clinical characterization in liver transplanted and nontransplanted patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012; 18(3):536-545.

(138.) Sano H, Nakazawa T, Ando T, et al. Clinical characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011; 18(2):154-161.

(139.) Schaeffer DF, Win LL, Hafezi-Bakhtiari S, Cino M, Hirschfield GM, ElZimaity H. The phenotypic expression of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis differs in the distribution of colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013; 58(9):2608-2614.

(140.) Claessen MM, Lutgens MW, van Buuren HR, et al. More right-sided IBDassociated colorectal cancer in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009; 15(9):1331-1336.

(141.) Torres J, Pineton de Chambrun G, Itzkowitz S, Sachar DB, Colombel JF. Review article: colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 34(5):497-508.

(142.) Thackeray EW, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Elfaki D, Sinakos E, Lindor KD. Colon neoplasms develop early in the course of inflammatory bowel disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 9(1):52-56.

(143.) Hanouneh IA, Macaron C, Lopez R, Zein NN, Lashner BA. Risk of colonic neoplasia after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012; 18(2):269-274.

(144.) Prideaux L, Kamm MA, De Cruz PP, Chan FK, Ng SC. Inflammatory bowel disease in Asia: a systematic review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 27(8):1266-1280.

(145.) Park SJ, Kim WH, Cheon JH. Clinical characteristics and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a comparison of Eastern and Western perspectives. World i Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(33):11525-11537.

(146.) Ooi CJ, Fock KM, Makharia GK, et al. The Asia-Pacific consensus on ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 25(3):453-468.

(147.) Ooi CJ, Hilmi I, Makharia GK, et al. The Asia Pacific Consensus statements on Crohn's disease part 1: definition, diagnosis and epidemiology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 31(1):45-55.

(148.) Moum B, Ekbom A, Vatn MH, Elgjo K. Change in the extent of colonoscopic and histological involvement in ulcerative colitis over time. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94(6):1564-1569.

(149.) Henriksen M, Jahnsen J, Lygren I, et al. Ulcerative colitis and clinical course: results of a 5-year population-based follow-up study (the IBSEN study). Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006; 12(7):543-550.

(150.) Ng SC, Tang W, Ching JY, et al. Incidence and phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease based on results from the Asia-Pacific Crohn's and colitis epidemiology study. Gastroenterology. 2013; 145(1):158-165.

(151.) Chow DK, Leong RW, Lai LH, et al. Changes in Crohn's disease phenotype over time in the Chinese population: validation of the Montreal classification system. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008; 14(4):536-541.

(152.) Pulimood AB, Ramakrishna BS, Kurian G, et al. Endoscopic mucosal biopsies are useful in distinguishing granulomatous colitis due to Crohn's disease from tuberculosis. Gut. 1999; 45(4):537-541.

(153.) Lee YJ, Yang SK, Byeon JS, et al. Analysis of colonoscopic findings in the differential diagnosis between intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease. Endoscopy. 2006; 38(6):592-597.

(154.) Huang X, Liao WD, Yu C, et al. Differences in clinical features of Crohn's disease and intestinal tuberculosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(12):3650-3656.

(155.) Skef W, Hamilton MJ, Arayssi T. Gastrointestinal Behcet's disease: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(13):3801-3812.

(156.) Lee SK, Kim BK, Kim TI, Kim WH. Differential diagnosis of intestinal Behcet's disease and Crohn's disease by colonoscopic findings. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(1):9-16.

(157.) Li J, Li P, Bai J, et al. Discriminating potential of extraintestinal systemic manifestations and colonoscopic features in Chinese patients with intestinal Behcet's disease and Crohn's disease. Chin Med J. 2015; 128(2):233-238.

(158.) Koklu S, Yuksel O, Onur I, et al. Ileocolonic involvement in Behcet's disease: endoscopic and histological evaluation. Digestion. 2010; 81(4):214-217.

Hwajeong Lee, MD; Maria Westerhoff, MD; Bo Shen, MD; Xiuli Liu, MD, PhD

Accepted for publication September 24, 2015.

From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York (Dr Lee); the Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle (Dr Westerhoff); and the Department of Gastroenterology/ Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute (Dr Shen), and the Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine (Dr Liu), University of Florida, Gainesville.

The authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

Presented at the 14th spring seminar of the Korean Pathologists Association of North America (KOPANA); March 19-21, 2015; Boston, Massachusetts.

Reprints: Xiuli Liu, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, PO Box 100275, Gainesville, FL 32610-0275 (email:

Caption: Figure 1. A, Normal colonic mucosa. B, Crypt distortion (yellow arrow) and basal lymphoplasmacytosis (red arrow) in chronic active colitis. C, Paneth cell metaplasia (arrow) and unevenly spaced crypts in the left colon. D, Pyloric gland metaplasia (arrow) in the terminal ileal biopsy of Crohn disease (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification X100 [A through D]).

Caption: Figure 2. A, Scanning view of diverticular disease-associated colitis. B, Higher-magnification view of diverticular disease-associated colitis mimicking idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. C, Collagenous colitis may complicate longstanding idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. This rectal biopsy shows surface epithelial injury, a mild increase in the number of inflammatory cells in the lamina propria, and prominent subepithelial collagenous band in a background of crypt distortion and Paneth cell metaplasia. D, Diversion colitis with nodular lymphoid tissue and crypt distortion. E, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (arrow) may complicate idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease; inset, immunohistochemistry highlights viral inclusions (arrow). F, Clostridium difficile-associated colitis may complicate idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (hematoxylineosin, original magnifications X12.5 [A], X100 [B, C, and F], X50 [D], and X200 [E]; CMV immunohistochemical stain, original magnification X200 [inset in E]).

Caption: Figure 3. A, Endoscopic view of active ulcerative colitis with erythema, edema, and exudates of the mucosa. B, Ulcerative colitis in remission after immunomodulatory therapy. Mucosal scars and small inflammatory pseudopolyps are present.

Caption: Figure 4. A, Typical macroscopic features of ulcerative colitis, with diffuse mucosal edema, erythema, and ulceration involving distal and transverse colon, with a sharp demarcation between the diseased and uninvolved segments. B, Scanning magnification view shows that the disease is superficial and confined within the mucosa, with intact submucosa and muscularis propria. C, Cecal involvement in a left-sided ulcerative colitis. D, Crypt rupture-associated granuloma in ulcerative colitis with neutrophils and mucin. It is closely associated with a damaged crypt (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X12.5 [B], X40 [C] and X400 ID]).

Caption: Figure 5. A, Typical macroscopic features of Crohn disease with a long, segmented stricture and thickened bowel wall. The specimen maintains a tubular structure on the grossing table when opened. B, Mural inflammation and fibrosis. C, Chronic active enteritis with pyloric gland metaplasia (arrow) of Crohn disease. D, Epithelioid granuloma of Crohn disease, without neutrophils or mucin (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X20 [B], X100 [C], and X200 [D]).

Caption: Figure 6. Examples of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease-associated dysplasia. A, Polypoid lesion in a patient with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Biopsy of the lesion showed low-grade dysplasia. B, This polypoid low-grade dysplasia resembles sporadic colonic adenoma, though it is within the segment of diseased colon. C, Flat high-grade dysplasia with marked cytological atypia. D, Flat low-grade dysplasia with pseudostratified and hyperchromatic nuclei, resembling the nuclei of sporadic colonic adenoma (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X40 [B], X200 [C], and XI00 [D]).

Caption: Figure 7. Examples of less common types of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease-associated dysplasia. A, Hypermucinous dysplasia. B, Traditional (filiform) serrated adenoma-like dysplasia. C, Dysplasia with eosinophilic surface (arrows) associated with a striking paucity of goblet cells in the crypt epithelium. D, A lesion resembling sessile serrated polyp arising in a diseased segment of colon (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications XI00 [A, C, and D] and X50 [B]).

Please Note: Illustration(s) are not available due to copyright restrictions.
Terminology for Reporting Findings on Colonoscopic Surveillance of
Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Modified From Paris
Classification) (a)

Term                                      Definition

Visible dysplasia         Dysplasia identified on targeted biopsies
                          from a lesion visualized at colonoscopy

1. Polypoid               Lesion protruding from the mucosa into the
                          lumen [greater than or equal to] 2.5 mm

a. Pedunculated           Lesion attached to the mucosa by a stalk

b. Sessile                Lesion not attached to the mucosa by a
                          stalk: entire base is contiguous with the

2. Nonpolypoid            Lesion with little (<2.5 mm) or no
                          protrusion above the mucosa

a. Superficial elevated   Lesion with protrusion but <2.5 mm above
                          the lumen (less than the height of the
                          closed cup of a biopsy forceps)

b. Flat                   Lesion without protrusion above the mucosa

c. Depressed              Lesion with at least a portion depressed
                          below the level of the mucosa

3. General descriptors

a. Ulcerated              Ulceration (fibrinous-appearing base with
                          depth) within the lesion

b. Border

i. Distinct border        Lesion's border is discrete and can be
                          distinguished from surrounding mucosa

ii. Indistinct border     Lesion's border is not discrete and cannot
                          be distinguished from surrounding mucosa

Invisible dysplasia       Dysplasia identified on random
                          (nontargeted) biopsies of colon mucosa
                          without a visible lesion

Abbreviation: SCENIC, Surveillance for Colorectal Endoscopic
Neoplasia Detection and Management in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Patients: International Consensus Recommendations.

(a) Reprinted from Loren Laine et al, "SCENIC International Consensus
Statement on Surveillance and Management of Dysplasia in Inflammatory
Bowel Disease," Gastroenterology 2015;148(3):639-651.95, copyright
2015, with permission from Elsevier. (95)
COPYRIGHT 2016 College of American Pathologists
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Lee, Hwajeong; Westerhoff, Maria; Shen, Bo; Liu, Xiuli
Publication:Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
Date:May 1, 2016
Previous Article:Practical Points in Gastric Pathology.
Next Article:Molecular Subtypes of Colorectal Cancer and Their Clinicopathologic Features, With an Emphasis on the Serrated Neoplasia Pathway.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters