Printer Friendly

Clinical Application of the PES/WES Index on Natural Teeth: Case Report and Literature Review.

1. Introduction

A goal of modern dentistry is the placement of aesthetically pleasing restorative material. Single-tooth replacement in the anterior area presents a challenge for the clinician. In this region, treatment considerations include shape and shade matching of the crown, interdental spacing, topography of the ridge, contacts of the opposing dentition, parafunctional habits, and esthetic desires of the patient. Facial aesthetics is based on the harmony of both smile and face [1]. Fundamental parameters for an aesthetic smile are the position of the lips, gingival tissue condition, color, shape, and teeth position. Then when a prosthetic rehabilitation has been planned, each of the above-mentioned parameters should be performed [2,3]. Careful rehabilitation plan and knowledge of the characteristics of the natural dentition are necessary for the rehabilitation of the maxillary anterior teeth. Clinical and radiographic examinations, study of models through diagnostic waxing, and cooperation with other specialists maybe the key to have a high aesthetic and functional success [4-7]. The success of a single restoration in the esthetic zone depends mainly on the harmonious integration of the restoration into the patient's overall appearance, especially the peri-implant soft tissue [8,9].

Both subjective (patients' ratings) and objective (esthetic scores and indices) assessments of implant esthetics are subject to growing interests [10,11].

In order to achieve satisfactory outcome, it is essential to choose proper materials and techniques, whose quality has improved in dentistry. As a matter of fact, nowadays, zirconia ceramic systems are available; they have both biomechanical and mimetic high-quality properties that allow the clinician to achieve aesthetic and long-lasting results [12]. Longitudinal clinical studies using this system in anterior and posterior teeth show supportive outcomes, proving it can be an alternative to metal-ceramic fixed prostheses [13-15].

This case report presented an anterior zirconia ceramic's fixed prosthesis with changes in size, proportion, shape, color, and texture that prejudiced the smile's harmony. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was recommended as a subjective measure of the esthetic outcome of implant-supported restorations [16].

Other means to assess the esthetic outcome of single-implant-supported restorations are various indices, such as implant aesthetic crown index (ICA), subjective esthetic score (SES), Peri-Implant and Crown Index (PICI), and comprehensive index comprising Pink and White Esthetic Score (PES/WES) [17-20]. Furhauser et al. introduced an excellent index termed Pink Esthetic Score (PES) for evaluation of the soft tissue around single-implant crowns that might change over time; PES could be a useful tool for monitoring long-term soft tissue alterations [18]. Belser et al. [19] have later introduced Pink Esthetic Score (PES) to evaluate the esthetic outcome of soft tissue around implant-supported single crowns in the anterior zone and White Esthetic Score (WES) to specifically focus on the visible part of the implant restoration itself. The effects of the observer's specialization were further investigated in the study by Cho et al. [21] using PES/WES index, which was the only study to recruit periodontists. However, the study had limitations due to the small number of the examiners from each specialty group and no oral surgeons involved in the study. Meijer et al. [17] proposed the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index (ICAI) for evaluation of single-implant supported crowns. The limitations of the study by Meijer et al. were the small sample size and recruitment of only two specialists (oral surgeon and prosthodontist). According to a recent study comparing the indices and their reproducibility, PES/WES and PICI seemed to be more suitable than ICAI as esthetic indices for single-implant-supported crowns [20]. The main aim of this study is to describe the PES/WES index and its clinical application on natural teeth. PES/WES index is one of the most reliable prosthetic criteria to be followed in case of aesthetic rehabilitations in the frontal maxillary sector not only on dental implants but it can be used for natural teeth. We also proposed to evaluate the long-term predictability of this clinical application, one of which is presented below, following the analysis of the most currently accepted literature.

2. Case Presentation

A 48-year-old female patient presents aesthetic problems related to the condition of the hard and soft tissue in the frontal maxillary sector (Figure 1), in particular coronal fracture of 1.3, abnormality of shape, volume and color of 1.1, asymmetry of the gingival margin with relative height, and volume alteration of mesial and distal papilla. Considering the clinical and radiographic preoperative exams, we analyzed clinical case using the index PES/WES parameters. The authors [19] have described the PES/WES index that combines both white and rose aesthetics parameters. In contrast to the original proposal [18], the PES comprises the following five variables (Table 1): mesial papilla, distal papilla, curvature of the facial mucosa, level of the facial mucosa, and root convexity/soft tissue color and texture at the facial aspect of the site. The WES specifically focuses on the visible part of the restoration itself and is based on the five following parameters: general tooth form; outline and volume of the clinical crown; color, which includes the assessment of the dimension's hue and value; surface texture; and translucency and characterization (Table 1). All ten parameters are assessed by direct comparison with the contralateral tooth and a score of 2, 1, or 0 is assigned to all ten parameters. Thus, a maximum total PES/WES of 20 can be reached which represents the optimum condition of the hard and soft tissues of the rehabilitated site compared to the characteristics of the contralateral natural tooth.

To determine PES and WES, crown on 1.1 was evaluated clinically and was photographed with the contralateral tooth. The initial score is 5 as described in Figure 1, given by the addition of the PES (3/10) and the WES (2/10) as shown in Figure 2: the result of the PES is given by the incomplete presence of the mesial papilla (1/10), the complete presence of the distal papilla (2/10), and the major discrepancy of other parameters (0/10); the result of the WES is given by the minor discrepancy of tooth form (1/10), outline/volume (1/10), and the major discrepancy of other parameters (0/10). According to the patient we created and analyzed a study model with relative diagnostic wax-up that highlights what will be the advantages and disadvantages of the future prosthesis. The program includes the direct restoration of 1.3 using a composite resin body A2, lithium disilicate prosthetic crown on natural tooth 1.1. The crown was cemented with dual cement Variolink Esthetic using adhesive technique recommended by the manufacturer. The photographs were made using Nikon D90 and a 105 mm lens (AF micro Nikkor 105 mm 1:2.8 D, Nikon) with a ring flash (EM-140 DG, SIGMA-Nikon).

We found significant differences between the initial and final scores of the PES/WES or rather from 5 to 20 as described in Figures 3, 4, and 5. It is given by the addition of the PES (10/10) and the WES (10/10) as shown in Figure 3: the result of the PES is given by the complete presence of the mesial papilla (2/10), the complete presence of the distal papilla (2/10) and no discrepancy of curvature of facial mucosa (2/10), no discrepancy of level of facial mucosa (2/10), and no discrepancy of root convexity/soft tissue color and texture (2/10); the result of the WES is given by the no discrepancy of tooth form (2/10), no discrepancy of outline/volume (2/10), no discrepancy of color (hue/value) (2/10), no discrepancy of surface texture (2/10), and no discrepancy of translucency (2/10).

3. Discussion

Nowadays, the aesthetic demands of patients are elevated, especially in visible areas such as the front region. According to the literature various indices were proposed to evaluate aesthetic outcomes of implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of the anterior sector. Belser et al. evaluated the esthetic outcome of maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using WES/PES, and they used the VAS to evaluate the satisfaction of the patient toward the single-implant in the esthetic zone [19]. We have reported in this case report a strong correlation between the esthetic evaluation performed by the dentist (PES/WES) and by the patient (VAS) as other studies have reported it [21,22]. PES/WES like PICI seemed to be more suitable than ICAI as esthetic indices; they are reproducible esthetic indices that are not influenced by different observers and present similar outcomes in the overall esthetic evaluation and because of this, they are recommended for clinical use [20]. In this study we want to show how this index is reliable even for the aesthetic evaluation of hard and soft tissues in the prosthetic rehabilitation of the natural tooth and how this index can be a clinical aid in controlling the maintenance of pink and white tissue over time as shown in the follow-up of 5 years in Figure 6. As you can see the soft tissues were stable enough in time, whereas the white aesthetic parameters have had color changes and surface texture.

4. Conclusions

According to the literature about application of the PES/WES index to aesthetic evaluation of implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of the anterior sector, we also verified the validity of such index for natural tooth-prosthetic rehabilitation of the anterior area. The rightness of the PES/WES index for the objective outcome assessment of the esthetic dimension of anterior single-tooth crown was confirmed. However, prospective clinical trials are needed to further validate and refine this index and its clinical use also for natural tooth-prosthetic rehabilitation.

Disclosure

Alessandro Lanza and Felice Femiano are Associate Professors in Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli. Alessandro Lanza is Chair of Dental Prosthesis and Implantology in Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli. Fabrizio Di Francesco and Gennaro De Marco are Dentist Doctors in Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli. Angelo Itro is Director of the Multidisciplinary Department of Medical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9659062

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the head of the dental laboratory, Mr. U Castaldo, for the realization of the prosthesis.

References

[1] N. Tole, V. Lajnert, D. Kovacevic Pavicic, and S. Spalj, "Gender, age, and psychosocial context of the perception of facial esthetics," Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 119-130, 2014.

[2] R. R. Tavarez, L. M. Goncalves, A. P. Dias et al., "An harmonic smile resulted from the use of ceramic prosthesis with zirconia structure: a case report," Journal of International Oral Health, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 90-92, 2014.

[3] M. M. Pithon, A. M. Santos, A. C. D. Viana de Andrade, E. M. Santos, F. S. Couto, and R. da Silva Coqueiro, "Perception of the esthetic impact of gingival smile on laypersons, dental professionals, and dental students," Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 448-454, 2013.

[4] T. Pinho, M. Neves, and C. Alves, "Multidisciplinary management including periodontics, orthodontics, implants, and prosthetics for an adult," American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 235-245, 2012.

[5] M. Dundar, M. A. Gungor, and E. Cal, "Multidisciplinary approach to restoring anterior maxillary partial edentulous area using an IPS Empress 2 fixed partial denture: a clinical report," Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 327-330, 2003.

[6] D. B. Dunn, "The use of a zirconia custom implant-supported fixed partial denture prosthesis to treat implant failure in the anterior maxilla: a clinical report," Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 415-421, 2008.

[7] S. B. Haralur and A. H. Al-Faifi, "Use of CAD/CAM in esthetic restoration of badly decayed tooth," Case Reports in Dentistry, vol. 2012, Article ID 608232, 3 pages, 2012.

[8] J. Cosyn, A. Eghbali, H. De Bruyn, M. Dierens, and T. De Rouck, "Single implant treatment in healing versus healed sites of the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation," Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 517-526, 2012.

[9] M. Hof, B. Pommer, G. D. Strbac, D. Suto, G. Watzek, and W. Zechner, "Esthetic evaluation of single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla following autologous bone augmentation," Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 24, no. 100, pp. 88-93, 2013.

[10] D. Buser, W. Martin, and U. C. Belser, "Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations," International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 19, pp. 43-61, 2004.

[11] L. F. Baracat, A. M. Teixeira, M. B. F. Dos Santos, V. D. P. P. Da Cunha, and L. Marchini, "Patients' expectations before and evaluation after dental implant therapy," Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 141-145, 2011.

[12] B. Zdravko, H. M. Deyarj, and S. Pervultvon, "Fracture strength of three-unit fixed partial denture cores (Y-TZP) with different connector dimension and design," Swedish Dental Journal, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 149-159, 2009.

[13] M. K. Molin and S. L. Karlsson, "Five-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based Denzir 3-unit FPDs," International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 223-227, 2008.

[14] R. P. Christensen and B. J. Ploeger, "A clinical comparison of zirconia, metal and alumina fixed-prosthesis frameworks veneered with layered or pressed ceramic: a three-year report," Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 141, no. 11, pp. 1317-1329, 2010.

[15] A. J. Raigrodski, M. B. Hillstead, G. K. Meng, and K.-H. Chung, "Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review," Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 170-177, 2012.

[16] U. Belser, D. Buser, and F. Higginbottom, "Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding esthetics in implant dentistry," International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 19, pp. 73-74, 2004.

[17] H. J. A. Meijer, K. Stellingsma, L. Meijndert, and G. M. Raghoebar, "A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues--the implant crown aesthetic index," Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 645-649, 2005.

[18] R. Furhauser, D. Florescu, T. Benesch, R. Haas, G. Mailath, and G. Watzek, "Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score," Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 639-644, 2005.

[19] U. C. Belser, L. Gratter, F. Vailati, M. M. Bornstein, H.-P. Weber, and D. Buser, "Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores," Journal of Periodontology, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 140-151, 2009.

[20] S. Tettamanti, C. Millen, J. Gavric et al., "Esthetic evaluation of implant crowns and peri-implant soft tissue in the anterior maxilla: comparison and reproducibility of three different indices," Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 517-526, 2016.

[21] H.-L. Cho, J.-K. Lee, H.-S. Um, and B.-S. Chang, "Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone," Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 188-193, 2010.

[22] A. Al-Dosari, R. Al-Rowis, F. Moslem, F. Alshehri, and A. M. Ballo, "Esthetic outcome for maxillary anterior single implants assessed by different dental specialists," The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 345-353, 2016.

Alessandro Lanza, (1,2) Fabrizio Di Francesco, (1) Gennaro De Marco, (1) Felice Femiano, (1) and Angelo Itro (1)

(1) Multidisciplinary Department of Medical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Luigi De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy

(2) Dental Prosthesis and Implantology, Multidisciplinary Department of Medical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Luigi De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Alessandro Lanza; alessandro.lanza@unina2.it

Received 10 January 2017; Accepted 24 January 2017; Published 5 February 2017

Academic Editor: Mine Dundar

Caption: Figure 1: PES/WES started score: 5/10.

Caption: Figure 2: Initial PES/WES.

Caption: Figure 3: Final PES/WES.

Caption: Figure 4: Crown just cemented. PES/WES final score: 20/20.

Caption: Figure 5: Black and white: checking value.

Caption: Figure 6: Follow-up of 5 years.
Table 1: Detailed description of PES/WES.

    (a)

                                PES

Parameter                     Absent      Incomplete     Complete
(i) Mesial papilla               0             1             2
(ii) Distal papilla              0             1             2

                              Major         Minor           No
                            discrepancy   discrepancy   discrepancy
(iii) Curvature of               0             1             2
facial mucosa
(iv) Level of facial             0             1             2
mucosa
(v) Root convexity/soft          0             1             2
tissue color and texture
Maximum total PES score                                     10

                                (b)

                                WES

Parameter                     Major         Minor           No
                            discrepancy   discrepancy   discrepancy
(i) Tooth form                   0             1             2
(ii) Tooth volume/outline        0             1             2
(iii) Color (hue/value)          0             1             2
(iv) Surface texture             0             1             2
(v) Translucency                 0             1             2
Maximum total WES score                                     10
COPYRIGHT 2017 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Case Report
Author:Lanza, Alessandro; Di Francesco, Fabrizio; De Marco, Gennaro; Femiano, Felice; Itro, Angelo
Publication:Case Reports in Dentistry
Article Type:Report
Date:Jan 1, 2017
Words:2798
Previous Article:Selectable Implant Removal Methods due to Mechanical and Biological Failures.
Next Article:A Case of Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in a Patient with Subpontic Osseous Hyperplasia.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters