Printer Friendly

Climate summit: slippery slopes ahead.

Climate summit: Slippery slopes ahead

Vice President Al Gore last week called the 1992 climate treaty inadequate to combat the threat of greenhouse warming and urged nations to agree on further measures. But when a major climate summit convenes in Berlin next week, the United States and other countries will almost certainly put off setting strict limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

The likely delay reflects widespread disagreement both within the United States and throughout the world on how to address the greenhouse warming problem. Indeed, despite making strong pledges about reducing emissions of heat-trapping gases, the United States and many other industrialized nations now admit they are having trouble meeting even the less stringent goals proposed by the 1992 Earth Summit treaty, signed in Rio de Janeiro. That agreement, formally known as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, requires industrialized countries to aim to return emissions of greenhouse gases to 1990 levels by the year 2000. That target is not binding and does not address the period after the century's close. The Berlin meeting will be the first conference of the nations that have ratified the Rio treaty -- at present, 117 countries plus the European Union. The summit marks their first opportunity to extend and possibly strengthen the treaty's provisions. Germany and several other nations had hoped a strict protocol on emissions reductions would emerge from the Berlin meeting. In negotiation sessions last year, the United States, the European Union, and other countries admitted that current commitments will fail to meet the climate convention's stated objective -- the stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations at a level that would prevent dangerous human interference with the climate system. But negotiators have since showed little resolve for making further commitments.

"We are now looking at a situation in which the maximum response that is politically feasible throughout the world still falls short of what is really needed to address the problem," Gore said in a speech last week at George Washington University in Washington, D.C.

Oil-producing nations have recently made a show of force, arguing that current emissions goals are sufficient -- a position backed by the U.S. petroleum industry and many other business sectors. The main greenhouse pollutant, carbon dioxide, comes from the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas.

During talks in February, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait blocked countries from formally declaring the treaty inadequate. The negotiating body adopted compromise wording, declaring the Rio convention's commitments "a first step." Instead of pushing for agreement on a binding protocol, the United States and the European Union will ask the Berlin conference to produce a mandate to negotiate a protocol by 1997. A road map for future talks, the mandate could outline specific targets and timetables for emissions cuts, or it could leave such contentious issues unresolved.

Debate will focus on how to include developing countries in a future protocol. The 1992 treaty set emissions goals only for industrialized countries, as they have produced most of the atmospheric buildup of greenhouse gases.

But because emissions are now increasing fastest in developing countries, the United States and other industrialized countries want to bring all nations into a protocol. Developing countries argue that rich nations must take stronger steps before asking poorer ones to accept potential brakes on their growing economies.

"There is this very dicey deal breaker going on between the developed and developing countries, especially with the United States not clarifying its position on this issue," says attorney Liz Barratt-Brown of the Natural Resources Defense Council in Washington D.C.

The Berlin conference also will address a controversial issue called joint implementation -- an as yet undefined process allowing countries to satisfy emissions targets through agreements with other nations. The developing world fears that this approach would permit rich nations to evade cutting their own emissions by paying poor nations to limit theirs.

Several procedural issues should provide lively debate in Berlin. In recent talks, countries sparred over whether to require voting by consensus. Supported by oil-bloc countries, this arrangement would give more power to individual nations that might disagree with a majority.

Even as they debate emissions limits for the post-2000 period, several countries now face trouble meeting the current goal for the century's end. In their plans submitted to the United Nations last year, Australia, Austria, Canada, Norway, Spain, and Sweden projected their net emissions would climb by 2000. The United States has also announced that its current plan will not meet the emissions goal, but the vice president reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to reach that target.
COPYRIGHT 1995 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1995, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:1995 Berlin climate conference
Author:Monastersky, Richard
Publication:Science News
Date:Mar 25, 1995
Words:758
Previous Article:Breathing time for liquid crystal states.
Next Article:One roof for much of federal science.
Topics:


Related Articles
Rio summit launches two 'Earth' treaties.
Climate change in Washington.
Consensus reached on climate change causes.
Forging a new global partnership.
Dusting the climate for fingerprints; has the greenhouse warming arrived? Will we ever know?
The story so far.
Last tango in Buenos Aires.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters