Printer Friendly

Christophe Bourgeois. Theologies poetiques de l'age baroque: La Muse chretienne (1570-1630).

Christophe Bourgeois. Theologies poetiques de l'age baroque: La Muse chretienne (1570-1630). Paris: Honore Champion, 2006. 864 pp. 130 [euro]. Review by LEONARD MARSH, LE MOYNE COLLEGE.

The very title of this work captures the substance of a problematic perspective that never ceases to challenge literary critics of late sixteenth and early seventeenth-century French literature. In a period that witnesses simultaneously the cultivation of poetry as a vocation and the reaffirmation of faith, how does a poetic voice translate or give witness to religious experience? How can one conceptualize the relationship, if there is one, between the poet and the theologian as interpreter of the scriptures? In anthropomorphic terms, how does one conceptualize the Greek goddess of music and poetry as the Muse converted to Christianity? Are such phenomena identifiably characteristic of a period of time that one can call baroque, a term that straddles art and literature as sister arts and one that French literary historians do not find particularly friendly? Bourgeois has addressed each of these questions with careful and meticulously researched analyses of the poetry of the better known Jean de la Ceppede, Jean de Sponde, and Agrippa d'Aubigne as well as that of some lesser known poets such as Pierre de Croix and Claude Hopil.

Taking his lead from the seminal work of Jean Rousset on the baroque, Bourgeois isolates the traditional characteristics of the baroque aesthetic, understanding them as the "visage particulier qu'a pris la rencontre entre le litteraire et le religieux" (13), and proposes to examine how these characteristics correspond to the literary production of certain poets, who personify the Christian Muse, between the years 1570 and 1630. Key to his examination is to "considerer chacun des poemes etudies comme la reformulation d'une parole donnee par la tradition chretienne. Le langage poetique reformule le langage theologique" (25). In examining this reformulation he toggles binary topoi such as interior and exterior, sacred and profane, introspection and ostentation, and the subjectivity of personal religious experience as related to the objectivity of proclaimed dogma. Tensions such as these reveal the instability, movement and ornamentation characteristic of the baroque "visage particulier," and the reader quickly becomes aware that Bourgeois's own discursive style imitates the very rhetoric he is examining, as if by what Faguet termed "innutrition."

Bourgeois dedicates Part I of his study to reconciling the sacred and the profane in the person of the poet. A sound and comprehensive explanation of the origins and development of secular humanism is balanced against the poet's call to "escrire Chrestiennement," as he cites Henri Estienne (81). Here Bourgeois balances myth and fable by assiduously backtracking to the classical tradition of Greece and Rome before approaching the Italian humanists and then treating one important poet of his study, Jean de la Ceppede, whose Theoremes Bourgeois considers a clear and constant example of the inclusion of mythological figures in the Christian poem. Bourgeois continues to put a face on the new Muse converted to Christianity by citing La Ceppede's self-reflective preface in which the poet admits to having been seduced by the pagan Muse in his youth only to mature by unmasking and rejecting her. As is his wont throughout the book, Bourgeois establishes a relationship to an intertext, here to the conversion of Saint Augustine as it is modeled in his Confessions. The role of Saint Augustine as intertext is continually plumbed as Bourgeois proceeds to analyze Pierre de Croix's Miroir de l'amour divin, seeing in it an example of the baroque tension between sacred and profane. Bourgeois notes here that the Miroir's "deux diverses citez" as earthly and celestial cities is a direct borrowing from Saint Augustine's City of God. A final adieu to the profane Muse closes Part I with an affirmation of divine love's rapture replacing the experience of human love.

Part II is by far the most significant section of the work. Entitled "Figures de la Bible," it examines how the rhetoric of biblical expression informs biblical exegesis as it is practiced by the poet. Questions of paraphrase, interpretation, imitation and rewriting place the scriptures as the primary intertext of the Christian Muse. Bourgeois has done enormous research here not only into La Ceppede, Pierre de Croix and

Aubigne but also into several translations of the Bible, including the Bible Benoist and the Latin Vulgate. Several side-by-side comparisons make clear cases of borrowing and interpolation. Notable here is the manner in which Aubigne and Sponde are shown to have modeled their style on biblical psalms. In addition to exegesis, biblical commentary was also practiced by the Christian Muse. Bourgeois has dutifully included discussion on how the Christian Muse has offered commentary on the scriptures. Immediately coming to mind is the case of La Ceppede's Theoremes, in which some 520 sonnets that chronicle the passion, death, resurrection and ascension of Christ are accompanied by their discursive and perhaps even more copious commentaries. Bourgeois has certainly given these commentaries their due but they are far less treated than the sonnets themselves although they give ample evidence of scriptural exegesis.

Part III, entitled "Rhetorique de l'ame," narrows the baroque question down to style. The key question here is how a poetic style specifically identified as baroque translates the lived experience of Christian life. Having taken his cue from Saint Francois de Sales's letter to La Ceppede at the very beginning of his first chapter, Bourgeois again takes up the seventeenth-century saint's injunction to apply one's love of God to a practical life of moral Christian living. The saint's Introduction a la vie devote (1641) is the stepping stone in this part to a discussion of the current of devotion in the early seventeenth century. The questions of meditation and spiritual exercises as well as giving voice to the voice of God in the eloquence of preaching are seen as emanating from a certain devout alchemy by which the experience of God's love is transformed into poetic expression. Thus, the mystical expression of Pierre de Croix's Miroir and the oxymoronic "chant silencieux" of Claude Hopil's Divins Elancements are seen as poetic expressions of an inner reality of religious experience..

Part IV situates all that preceded in a historical perspective. Twentieth-century and earlier criticism, notably that of Jean-Pierre Camus (1584-1652), is brought to bear on Bourgeois's argument.

In sum, Bourgeois has set an enormous agenda in a volume that is more important as a resource for French devotional poetry of the period than as a work that answers convincingly the question of how the baroque aesthetic is expressed in that literature, if indeed it is. On the other hand, the reader is treated to a wide reaching array of intertexts, background material and textual explications that pepper the volume. It is easy to forget the author's original goal to show the integration of theology and rhetoric in the conversion of the Muse as he leads the reader along numerous paths. This book will be valuable to any researcher already familiar with the terminology of classical rhetoric, Tridentine theology, mystical literature, the sister arts, and the devotional poetry of the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Texas A&M University, Department of English
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Marsh, Leonard
Publication:Seventeenth-Century News
Article Type:Book review
Date:Sep 22, 2007
Words:1182
Previous Article:Catherine Marchal-Weyl. Le Tailleur et le fripier. Transformations des personnages de la comedia sur la scene francaise (1630-1660).
Next Article:Michael Moriarty. Fallen Nature, Fallen Selves: Early Modern French Thought II.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters