Printer Friendly

Children can't be pawns in disputes between parents and CASs, Judge says.

ST. THOMAS, ON -- "In child protection proceedings, the children are the innocent focus of the hearing; they cannot be used as pawns in a procedural gambit between the parents and the [Children's Aid] Society that could result in harm accruing to them," was repeated as a much argued case of seven children removed from parents by a children's aid society, found an echo in another court room.

Though the CAS and the parents settled their dispute when the parents agreed to change their methods of punishment and the children returned to the family home, the parents continued to pursue the argument in court.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed an appeal by parents, whose children apprehended by the St. Thomas and Elgin Children's Aid Society in 2001, saying that the questions raised by the appeal were not only abstract but that the parents' Charter rights had not been violated as a result of the GAS action.

Upholding the ruling made by Justice Elinor Schnall of the Ontario Court of Justice who heard the original Charter issues raised by the parents, Justice Lynne C. Leitch of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, said statements made by Justice Schnall in her ruling "are not binding authority on the question whether Charter remedies can ever be available in a child protection proceeding."

Justice Leitch also agreed with Justice Schnall's refusal to exclude evidence that was collected by the police and authorities through videotaping the children without parental consent. Justice Schnall said the evidence did not violate section 24 of the parents' Charter rights and to exclude the evidence or to halt the proceedings "would result in punishing the children for the misdeeds of the Society or the child protection worker."

The respondents to the appeal, included the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Office of the Children's Lawyer and the Ontario Association of Children's Aid Societies, who was granted Intervener status.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Community Action Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Children's Aid Societies
Publication:Community Action
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1CONT
Date:Apr 18, 2005
Words:319
Previous Article:Million dollar study of the social economy sector launched.
Next Article:U.S. consumers with disabilities satisfied with disability rights law.
Topics:


Related Articles
UN takes aim at children: the UN Children's Summit feigned compassion, but its true agenda was to bypass national sovereignty, usurp parental...
In New York, battered mothers not presumed neglectful.
Judge reprimands Windsor CAS on protective custody of young refugee.
Settle protection cases out of court.
35 children restored to parental custody as Ontario expands special services.
Judge backs Lanark CAS in parent access challenge.
"Save Our Kids, Keep AIDS Out:" anti-AIDS activism and the legacy of community control in Queens, New York.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters