Printer Friendly

Child Welfare: States Face Challenges in Developing Information Systems and Reporting Reliable Child Welfare Data.

GAO-04-267T November 19, 2003

To better monitor children and families served by state child welfare agencies, Congress authorized matching funds for the development of statewide automated child welfare information systems (SACWIS) and required that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) compile information on the children served by state agencies. This testimony is based on our July 2003 report and addresses the following: (1) states' experiences in developing child welfare information systems and HHS's role in assisting in their development, (2) factors that affect the reliability of data that states collect and report on children served by their child welfare agencies and HHS's role in ensuring the reliability of those data, and (3) practices that child welfare agencies use to overcome challenges associated with SACWIS development and data reliability. For the July 2003 report, we surveyed all 50 states and the District of Columbia regarding their experiences developing and using information systems and their ability to report data to HHS. We also reviewed a variety of HHS documents and visited five states to obtain firsthand information. Finally, we interviewed HHS officials and child welfare and data experts and reviewed relevant literature.

HHS reported that 47 states are developing or operating a SACWIS, but many states continue to face challenges developing their systems. Most state officials said they recognize the benefit their state will achieve by developing SACWIS, such as contributing to the timeliness of child abuse and neglect investigations; however, despite the availability of federal funds since 1994, states reported a median delay of 2 1/2 years beyond the time frames they set for completion. States reported that they encountered some difficulties during SACWIS development, such as challenges receiving state funding and creating a system that reflected their work processes. In response to some of these challenges, HHS has provided technical assistance to help states develop their systems and conducted on-site reviews of SACWIS to verify that the systems meet federal requirements. Despite efforts to implement comprehensive information systems, several factors affect the states' ability to collect and report reliable adoption, foster care, and child abuse and neglect data. States responding to GAO's survey and officials in the five states GAO visited reported that insufficient caseworker training and inaccurate and incomplete data entry affect the quality of the data reported to HHS. In addition, states reported technical challenges reporting data. Despite HHS assistance, many states report ongoing challenges, such as the lack of clear and documented guidance on how to report child welfare data. In addition, although states were mandated to begin reporting data to the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis Reporting System (AFCARS) in 1995, few reviews of states' AFCARS reporting capabilities have been conducted to assist states in resolving some of their reporting challenges. Some states are using a variety of practices to address the challenges associated with developing SACWIS and improving data reliability. For example, 28 states reported using approaches to help caseworkers identify and better understand the data elements that are required for federal reporting. In a related report, we recommended that the Secretary of HHS consider ways to enhance the guidance and assistance offered to states to help them overcome the key challenges in collecting and reporting child welfare data. These efforts could include a stronger emphasis placed on conducting AFCARS reviews and timelier follow-up to help states implement their improvement plans or identifying a useful method to provide clear and consistent guidance. HHS generally agreed with our findings but, in response to our recommendation, said that we did not recognize the longterm efforts to provide AFCARS and National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System related guidance. HHS also noted that the data definitions need to be updated and revised and said it was in the process of revising regulations. HHS added that it is firmly committed to continue to support the states and to provide technical guidance and assistance as resources permit.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Stonehenge International
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:General Accounting Office Reports & Testimony
Date:Dec 1, 2003
Words:650
Previous Article:Aviation Security: Federal Air Marshal Service Is Addressing Challenges of Its Expanded Mission and Workforce, but Additional Actions Needed.
Next Article:Computer-Based Patient Records: Short-Term Progress Made, but Much Work Remains to Achieve a Two-Way Data Exchange Between VA and DOD Health Systems.


Related Articles
Welfare Reform: Tribes Are Using TANF Flexibility To Establish Their Own Programs.
Child Welfare: Most States Are Developing Statewide Information Systems, but the Reliability of Child Welfare Data Could Be Improved.
Welfare Reform: Information on TANF Balances.
Child Welfare: Improved Federal Oversight Could Assist States in Overcoming Key Challenges.
CUISTIX DEBUTS GEOSPATIAL CASE MANAGER FOR CHILD WELFARE.
MICROSOFT SPONSORS CASE STUDY OF FLORIDA FOSTER CARE SYSTEM.
Welfare Reform: Rural TANF Programs Have Developed Many Strategies to Address Rural Challenges.
Child Welfare: Federal Action Needed to Ensure States Have Plans to Safeguard Children in the Child Welfare System Displaced by Disasters.
Child welfare and well-being.
The public/private partnership.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters