Printer Friendly

Characterization of nutritional value for twenty-one pork muscles.

ABSTRACT : A study was conducted to evaluate nutritional value for twenty-one pork muscles. Ten market-weight crossbred pigs (five gilts and five barrows) were used for evaluating proximate chemical composition, cholesterol, total iron, calorie and fatty acid contents. As preliminary analysis revealed no noticeable sex effect, pooled data from both sexes were used for the final analysis. M. rectus femoris had the highest moisture content, while m. latissimus dorsi was lowest in moisture content (p<0.05). Protein content was highest for m. longissimus dorsi and lowest for m. supraspinatus (p<0.05). The tensor fasciae and latissimus dorsi muscles contained the highest intramuscular fat (p<0.05), while rectus femoris, adductor and vastus lateralis were lowest in intramuscular fat content. When simple correlations between chemical values were computed for the pooled dataset from all muscles, intramuscular fat had significant (p<0.05) negative linear relationships with moisture (r = -0.85) and protein (r = -0.51) contents. Calorie levels were not significantly affected by fat content, while rectus femoris and latissimus dorsi muscles showed lowest and highest calorie contents, respectively (p<0.05). Polyunsaturated fatty acid content was highest (p<0.05) for both m. adductor and m. rectus femoris, while it was lowest for m. longissimus dorsi. Collectively, the current study identified a large amount of variation in nutritional characteristics between pork muscles, and the data can be used for the development of muscle-specific strategies to improve eating quality of meats and meat products. (Key Words : Pork, Muscles, Nutritional Characteristics)


Pork belly and boston butt are the most demanding and popular cuts in Korean markets and consequently their retail prices are much higher than other cuts (KMTA, 2007). On the other hand, pork picnic shoulder and ham are often regarded as a lower value cuts and utilized for processed meat products. Most previous studies compared physical, chemical and textural characteristics between three to eight pork muscles (Briskey et al., 1960; Topel et al., 1966; Lin et al., 1985), while a limited number of studies reported the nutritional characteristics of pork cuts (Moss et al., 1983; Dorado et al., 1999). The previous studies focused on differences in pH, moisture content, fat content, myoglobin content and shear force, remaining nutritional values for individually specific pork muscles which are significant information for cut- and muscle-based sale and/or for the best use of individual muscle in processed products.

Recently, pork industry in Korea has made various efforts to identify the potential value of the prime cuts, especially the shoulder and ham that are well-suited for processed products in new product development. However, the general characteristics of industrial primal cuts are confounded by various individual muscles, and little information is known on the value of individual muscles. Therefore, there are great needs for determining quality and nutritional characteristics of individual muscles for the best use of individual muscles as meat and processed products. Given that current study was conducted to identify the proximate chemical composition, cholesterol content, total iron content, calorie content, and fatty acid composition for twenty-one pork muscles.


Animal and sampling

A total of ten crossbred (five gilts and five barrows) were sampled from a market-weighted industrial population carcass weight: 86.00 [+ or -] 5.68 kg), and slaughtered at a commercial abattoir. Pigs were fed at a commercial diet under an industrial environment, and transported approximately 2 h from farm to the slaughter house before being slaughtered after approximately a 4-h resting with free access to water. Carcasses were chilled at 0[degrees]C for 24 h and were transported to the National Livestock Research Institute (NLRI) and kept at 2[degrees]C for further 3 days. Carcass characteristics are tabulated in Table 1. At 4 days postmortem, twenty one muscles were dissected from right hand side shoulder (m. infraspinatus (379.00 [+ or -] 50.76 g), pectoralis profundi (tube) (293.30 [+ or -] 32.46 g), pectoralis profundi (Fan) (504.30 [+ or -] 140.12 g), brachiocephalicus (191.80 [+ or -] 32.11 g), latissimus dorsi (234.00 [+ or -] 88.39 g), subscapularis (144.90 [+ or -] 26.20 g), supraspinatus (420.50 [+ or -] 28.31 g), triceps brachii (794.40 [+ or -] 54.32 g)), ham (m. adductor (344.60 [+ or -] 35.45 g), biceps femoris (1,449.40 [+ or -] 178.83 g), gastrocneminus (903.10 [+ or -] 173.36 g), gluteus medius (894.30 [+ or -] 136.16 g), gluteus superrificialis (245.60 [+ or -] 66.98 g), gracilis (287.50 [+ or -] 20.59 g), rectus femoris (456.20 [+ or -] 76.72 g), semimembranosus (1,154.30 [+ or -] 138.71 g), semitendinosus (493.00 [+ or -] 34.38 g), vastus intermedius (302.30 [+ or -] 29.70 g), tensor fasciae latae (213.20 [+ or -] 29.72 g), vastus lateralis (369.30 [+ or -] 40.48 g)) and loin (m. longissimus dorsi). Knife removable subcutaneous fat was trimmed off, and homogenized by using a grinder (MN-22S, Hankook Fujee Industries Co. Korea). The ground pork was portioned for objective measurements, vacuum packaged in barrier bags (polyethylene + nylon, 20 x 29 cm), and stored at -40[degrees]C until analysis.

Determination of nutritional value

Moisture, protein, fat and ash contents were measured in accordance with the methods reported by AOAC (1990). Cholesterol content was determined using a previous method (Naeemi et al., 1995) with a minor modification. Briefly, one gram ([+ or -] 0.01 g) of the frozen was spiked with 0.5 ml (5[alpha]-cholestane stock solution, 1 mg/0.5 ml) internal standard, and added to 5 ml saturated methanolic KOH in a 35 ml screw-capped vial. The vial was capped and then heated for 30 min at 80[degrees]C. After cooling at room temperature, 5 ml cyclohexane was added to and then shaken for 1 min. An aliquot (1 [micro]l) of the cyclohexane layer was injected into the Gas Chromatography (Agilent Model 6390, USA). The operating conditions of Gas Chromatography: column, fused silica capillary column (30 x 0.32 mm id) coated with SE-30 with film thickness of 0.25 (HP-5); carrier gas, nitrogen; oven temperature, 180 to 280[degrees]C, 20[degrees]C/min, hold at 280[degrees]C for 10 min; injector, splitter, 20 ml/min; temperature, 290[degrees]C; detector, flame ioniztion detector at 300[degrees]C. Cholesterol concentrations were determined by means of the internal standard and calibration curve.

Total iron content was determined by Matilainen and Tummavuori (1996). Briefly, 20 g of frozen sample was weighed into a ceramic crucible, and laid in ashes in a muffle furnace (Kukje trading corp., Korea) at 600[degrees]C for 4 days. After cooling at room temperature, samples were further digested with 50% HCl overnight. Digested samples were diluted with distilled-deionized water up to 100 ml. Total iron content was detected by an inductively coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (SpectroFlame, Spectro analytical Instruments, Germany) at 259.94 nm, and quantified with a standard curve using 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 ppmn of iron.

Calorie contents were analyzed using Calorie meter (1261, Parr instrument, USA) and expressed as cal/g sample (AOAC, 1995). Total lipids were extracted using chloroform-methanol (2:1, v/v) according to the procedure of Folch et al. (1957). An aliquot of total lipid extract was methylated as described by Morrison and Smith (1964). Fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed by a gas chomatograph (Varian 3,600) fitted with a fused silica capillary column, omegawax 205 (30 m x 0.32 mm ID, 0.25 [micro]m film thickness). The injection port was at 250[degrees]C and the detector was maintained at 300[degrees]C. Results were expressed as percentages of the total fatty acid (saturated, unsaturated, mono-unsaturated, and poly-unsaturated fatty acid contents) detected based on the total peak area (Cho et al., 2005). For all objective measurements above an average of triplicates were used for each sample.

Statistical analysis

As there was no sex effect, pooled data were analyzed using the General Linear Models (GLM) of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 1998). Significant differences among muscles were analyzed by Duncan's Multiple Range test at p<0.05.


At the wake of growing concerns on health problems related to meats and meat products, identification of nutritional values for individual pork cuts become a significant issue, but very limited information (if any) is accessible. Here we reports, for the first time, chemical and meat quality traits of twenty-one pork muscle. Table 2 presents twenty-one pork muscles were ranked in moisture, protein, fat, and ash contents. As a preliminary analysis revealed no significant sex effect, pooled data from both sex were used for final analysis. Results showed that rectus femoris muscle had the highest moisture content (76.82%), followed by m. vastus lateralis (76.62%), while m. latissimus dorsi showed the lowest moisture content with 72.20%. According to the result of Nold et al. (1999), the percent of moisture reported for muscles was 75.6% (rectus femoris) to 69.1% (gluteus medius). In this study, moisture content of ham most muscles was greater than that of shoulder muscles. The low fat content reported for rectus femorsis (1.54%) is in agreement with Briskey et al. (1960), Topel et al. (1966) and Nold et al. (1999), who reported that rectus femorsis had the lower fat content than the other muscles. Nold et al. (1999) reported semimembranosus, biceps femoris, and gluteus medius had 2.15%, 2.12%, and 1.75% fat, respectively. In the case of protein, longissimus dorsi muscle showed the highest values with 21.79% while supraspinatus muscle was lowest with 18.51%.

Intramuscular fat has a significant effects for determining eating quality through its effect on prevention of over-cooking for the grilling cooking method, stimulation of salivary and reduction of biting pressure at consumption (Thompson, 2002). Although there are limited reports on intramuscular fat content for individual pork cut, the current data revealed that tensor fasciae latae and latissimus dorsi muscles contained the highest chemical intramuscular fat (7.03% and 6.92%, respectively), while vastus lateralis, adductor and rectus femoris muscles had the lowest (1.73%, 1.67%, and 1.54% respectively). Overall, fat content of shoulder muscles was higher than that of ham muscles, but semitendinosus muscle was higher than the other ham muscles and more similar to brachiocephalicus among shoulder muscles. A previous study reported that, for the same breed with a similar backfat thickness, intramuscular fat for triceps brachii, longissimus dorsi, gluteus medius, semimembranosus, biceps femoris, semitendinosus muscles were 4.4%, 4.1%, 3.4%, 3.9%, 4.1%, and 7.8%, respectively (Prusa et al., 1988). Similarly, our previous study (Hwang et al., 2005) showed intramuscular chemical fat content of approximately 2-3% in longissimus muscle of commercial pork breed, but the current population showed relatively a higher fat content for the given muscle. When simple correlations between chemical values for pooled dataset from all muscles intramuscular fat had significant (p<0.05) linear relationships with moisture (r = -0.85), and protein (r = -0.51) contents. It could be expected from the nature of muscle composition, but again support that intramuscular fat content is a significant determinant for eating quality.

The cholesterol content of twenty-one pork muscles did not differ significantly due likely to a large variation between animals, while m. Infraspnatus had the highest content (91.60 mg/100 g) and m. longissimus dorsi had the lowest (63.63 mg/100 g) (Table 3). Cholesterol content in meat cuts and its relationship to fat content have been received significant attention from scientific and consumer's point of view, but data from various experiments has varied. A number of previous studies reported lower levels of cholesterol in longissimus muscle with 57 mg/100 g (Dorada et al., 1999) and 59 mg/100 g (Moss et al., 1983). Similarly Bohac and Rhee (1988) reported cholesterol content of 55.9 mg/100 g, 53.1 mg/100 g, and 59.7 mg/100 g for longissimus dorsi, semimembranosus, and semitendinosus muscles, respectively. These figures are considerably lower than our current result. On the other hand, Tu et al. (1967) reported that the cholesterol contents were 62 and 65 mg/100 g for pork longissimus dorsi and semitendinosus, respectively, and the values are very close with our current data. A previous study (Dorado et al., 1999) identified a significantly high linear relationship between intramuscular fat content and cholesterol levels (r = 0.88, p<0.05), but our results could not find any meaningful correlations between these factors. However, given the factors affecting the relationships such as breed, age of animal, feeding and rearing environment (Tu et al., 1967), the result was not surprising. Similarly, Rhee et al. (1993) failed to find any relationship between fat content and cholesterol levels in pork muscles. The study showed that pork with 9 g/100 g, 14 g/100 g, and 18 g/100 g fat content had 62 mg/100 g, 64 mg/100 g, and 62 mg/100 g of cholesterol contents, respectively.

A wide range of total iron content was observed among twenty-one pork muscles (Table 3). Overall, total iron content of the foreleg muscles had higher than that of the hind leg muscles, and the highest iron contents were observed in m. vastus intermedius and infraspanatus (11.88 ppm and 11.70 ppm, respectively), while m. longissimus dorsi (4.48 ppm) had the lowest (p<0.05). The results were very close with an reported data for pork (9.2 ppm for overall pork cuts, Moss et al., 1983), but approximately a half of beef muscles (22.8 and 21.4 ppm for infraspinatus and gluteus medius, respectively, Yancey et al., 2006).

Calorie content was lowest (p<0.05) for m. rectus femoris, and was highest for m. latissimus dorsi (Table 3) and that was due to the higher fat content in internal muscle. The rationale was evidenced by a strong positive correlation for pooled data from all muscles between calorie content and fat content in the current study (r = 0.81; p<0.0001).

Fatty acid compositions in meat have received an increased interest considering these implications for human health and product quality (Wood et al., 2003). The ratios of polyunsaturated fatty acids to saturated fatty acids are widely used to evaluate the nutritional value of fat. In the current study, total contents of polyunsaturated fatty acid were the highest (p<0.05) for adductor and rectus femoris, while the lowest for longissimus dorsi (Table 4). The monounsaturated fatty acid composition of the biceps femoris and longissimus dorsi had higher than that of others, while rectus femoris and subscpularis had lower than others (p<0.05). The saturated fatty acid composition of the latissimus dorsi had higher than that of others (p<0.05). Previous study found that fatty acid composition of triglycerides from longissimus dorsi of pork was 42.5% of saturated, 50.3% of monounsaturated, and 7.2% of polyunsaturated and biceps femoris of pork was 36.2% of saturated, 49.0% of monounsaturated, and 14.9% of polyunsaturated (Leseigneur-Meynier and Gandemer, 1991). The current results are overall in agreement of the previous studies.


There was a large amount of variation in nutritional properties among many specific pork muscles. Our results provided a basis for the development of muscle-specific strategies to improve the quality and value of muscles from pork. This information will facilitate the development of new products using pork picnic shoulders and hams, which considered to be lower value than other cuts such as the pork belly in Korean pork industry. Furthermore, the current dataset may help to identify new marketing strategies for pork cuts such as picnic shoulders and hams in Korea.

Received April 12, 2007; Accepted July 28, 2007


AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis (15th ed). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.

AOAC. 1995. Official methods of analysis (16th ed). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.

Bohac, C. E. and K. S. Rhee. 1988. Influence of animal diet and muscle location on cholesterol content of beef and pork muscles. Meat Sci. 23:71-75.

Briskey, E. J., W. G. Hoekstra, R. W. Bray and R. H. Grummer. 1960. A comparision of certain physical and chemical characteristics of eight pork muscles. J. Anim. Sci. 19:214-225.

Cho, S. H., B. Y. Park, J. H. Kim, I. H. Hwang, J. H. Kim and J. M. Lee. 2005. Fatty acid profiles and sensory properties of longissimus dorsi, triceps brachii, and semimembranosus muscles from Korean Hanwoo and Australian angus beef. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:1786-1793.

Dorado, M., E. M. Martin Gomez, F. Jimenez-Colmenero and T. A. Masoud. 1999. Cholestrol and fat contents of spanish commercial pork cuts. Meat Sci. 51:321-323.

Folch, J., M. Lees and G. H. S. Stanley. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226:497-500.

Hwang, I. H., B. Y. Park, J. H. Kim, S. H. Cho and J. M. Lee. 2005. Assessment of postmortem proteolysis by gel-based proteome analysis and its relationship to meat quality traits in pig longissimus. Meat Sci. 69:79-91.

Korea meat trade association. 2007. The survey of consum and distribution of meat-pork (2007. 1). board/data/report01_3573_200702_p.pdf.

Leseigneur-Meynier, A. and G. Gandemer. 1991. Lipid composition of pork muscle in relation to the metabolic type of the fibres. Meat Sci. 29:229-241.

Lin, R. R., J. A. Carpenter and J. O. Reagan. 1985. Chemical, cooking and textural properties of semimembranosus, semitendinosus and biceps femoris muscles of pork. J. Food Qual. 7:277-281.

Matilainen, R. and J. Tummavuori. 1996. Iron Determination in fertilizers by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry: Study of spectral and interelement effects at different wavelengths. J. AOAC Intl. 79:22-28.

Morrison, W. R. and L. M. Smith. 1964. Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters and dimethylacetals from lipids with boron trifluoride-methanol. J. Lipid Res. 5:600-608.

Moss, M., J. M. Holden, K. Ono, R. Cross, H. Slover, B. Berry, E. Lanza, R. Thompson, W. Wolf, J. Vanderslice, H. Johnson and K. Stewart. 1983. Nutrient composition of fresh retail pork. J. Food Sci. 48:1767-1771.

Naeemi, E. D., N. Ahmad, T. K. Al-Sharrah and M. Behbahani. 1995. Rapid and simple method for determination of cholesterol in processed food. J. AOAC Intl. 78:1522-1525.

Nold, R. A., J. R. Romans, W. J. Costello and G. W. Libal. 1999. Characterization of muscles from boars, barrows, and gilts slaughtered at 100 or 110 kilograms: differences in fat, moisture, color, water-holding capacity, and collagen. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1746-1754.

Prusa, K. J., J. A. Love and L. L. Christian. 1988. Fat content and sensory analysis of selected pork muscles taken from carcasses with various backfat levels. J. Food Qual. 12:135-143.

Rhee, K. S., H. A. Griffith-Bradle and Y. A. Ziprin. 1993. Nutrient composition and retention in browned ground beef, lamb, and pork. J. Food Com. Anal. 6:268-277.

SAS. SAS/STAT. 1998. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Statistics. SAS inst., Cary, NC.

Thompson, J. 2002. Managing meat tenderness. Meat Sci. 62:295-308.

Topel, D. G., R. A. Merkel, D. L. Mackintosh and J. L. Hall. 1966. Variation of some physical and biochemical properties within and among selected porcine muscles. J. Anim. Sci. 25:277-282.

Tu, C., W. D. Powrie and O. Fennema. 1967. Free and sterified cholesterol content of animal muscles and meat products. J. Food Sci. 32:30-34.

Wood, J. D., R. I. Richardson, G. R. Nute, A. V. Fisher, M. M. Campo, E. Kasapidou, P. R. Sheard and M. Enser. 2003. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review. Meat Sci. 66:21-32.

Yancey, E. J., J. P. Grobbel, M. E. Dikeman, J. S. Smith, K. A. Hachmeister, E. C. Chambers IV, P. Gadgil, G. A. Milliken and E. A. Dressler. 2006. Effects of total iron, myoglobin, hemoglobin, and lipid oxidation of uncooked muscles on livery flavor development and volatiles of cooked beef steaks. Meat Sci. 73:680-686.

J. H. Kim *, P. N. Seong, S. H. Cho, B. Y. Park, K. H. Hah, L. H. Yu, D. G. Lim, I. H. Hwang (1) D. H. Kim, J. M. Lee and C. N. Ahn

Quality Control and Utilization of Animal Products Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA 564 Omokchun-dong, Kwonsun-gu, 441-706, Suwon, Korea

* Corresponding Author: J. H. Kim. Tel: +82-31-290-1702, Fax: +82-31-290-1697, E-mail:

(1) Department of Animal Resources and Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, 664-14 Duckjin-Dong, 561-756, Jeonju, Korea.
Table 1. The average cold carcass weight, backfat thickness
and retail lean meat from different pigs with their sex
and number (Mean [+ or -] standard deviation)

Sex Number Carcass weight (kg) Backfat thickness (mm)

Barrow 5 88.20 [+ or -] 5.63 24.80 [+ or -] 2.39
Gilt 5 83.80 [+ or -] 5.36 21.40 [+ or -] 4.45
Total 10 86.00 [+ or -] 5.68 23.10 [+ or -] 3.81

Sex Retail lean meat (kg)

Barrow 56.24 [+ or -] 2.62
Gilt 54.41 [+ or -] 2.90
Total 55.32 [+ or -] 2.78

Table 2. Percentage of moisture, protein, fat and ash
contents for twenty-one pork muscles

Muscles Moisture Protein

Infraspanatus 74.82 (cdef) 18.78 (jkl)
Pectoralis profundi (tube) 73.89 (fgh) 19.80 (fghi)
Pectoralis profundi (fan) 74.24 (efg) 20.11 (defgh)
Brachiocephalicus 73.48 (gh) 19.34 (ijk)
Latissimus dorsi 72.2 (il) 19.63 (ghi)
Subscapularis 75.02 (cdef) 20.28 (cdefg)
Supraspinatus 74.76 (def) 18.51 (l)
Triceps brachii 75.34 (bcde) 19.98 (efghi)
Adductor 76.11 (abc) 21.25 (ab)
Biceps femoris 74.90 (cdef) 19.81 (fghi)
Gastrocneminus 74.80 (cdef) 19.58 (ghi)
Gluteus medius 75.31 (cde) 20.76 (bcd)
Gluteus superrificialis 73.95 (fgh) 20.47 (cdef)
Gracilis 75.88 (abcd) 19.61 (ghi)
Rectus femoris 76.82 (a) 20.56 (bcde)
Semimembranosus 75.48 (bcde) 20.89 (bc)
Semitendinosus 74.31 (efg) 18.80 (jkl)
Vastus intermedius 75.72 (abcd) 18.66 (kl)
Tensor fasciae latae 72.80 (hi) 19.48 (hij)
Vastus lateralis 76.62 (ab) 20.53 (cdef)
Longissimus dorsi 75.51 (bcde) 21.79 (a)

Muscles Fat Ash

Infraspanatus 4.97 (bcd) 0.94 (bcdef)
Pectoralis profundi (tube) 5.07 (bcd) 0.96 (bcdef)
Pectoralis profundi (fan) 4.40 (cdef) 0.97 (bcdef)
Brachiocephalicus 6.05 (ab) 0.92 (cdef)
Latissimus dorsi 6.92 (a) 0.94 (bcdef)
Subscapularis 3.37 (efg) 0.96 (bcdef)
Supraspinatus 5.35 (bc) 0.93 (bcdef)
Triceps brachii 3.44 (efg) 1.00 (abcd)
Adductor 1.67 (i) 1.05 (a)
Biceps femoris 4.43 (cdef) 0.96 (bcdef)
Gastrocneminus 4.82 (cd) 0.90 (ef)
Gluteus medius 3.22 (fg) 1.01 (ab)
Gluteus superrificialis 4.58 (cde) 1.00 (abc)
Gracilis 3.79 (defg) 0.91 (def)
Rectus femoris 1.54 (i) 1.01 (ab)
Semimembranosus 3.07 (gh) 0.98 (abcde)
Semitendinosus 6.12 (ab) 0.88 (f)
Vastus intermedius 4.40 (cdef) 0.94 (bcdef)
Tensor fasciae latae 7.03 (a) 0.93 (bcdef)
Vastus lateralis 1.73 (i) 0.98 (abcde)
Longissimus dorsi 2.02 (hi) 0.99 (abcde)

(a-l) Means in the same column with different letters
are significantly different (p<0.05).

Table 3. Cholesterol, total iron, and calorie contents
for twenty-one pork muscles

Muscles Cholesterol Total iron
 (mg/100 g) (ppm)

Infraspanatus 91.60 11.70 (a)
Pectoralis profundi (tube) 80.24 8.78 (bcd)
Pectoralis profundi (fan) 74.80 6.93 (ef)
Brachiocephalicus 75.59 9.75 (b)
Latissimus dorsi 68.26 7.17 (def)
Subscapularis 86.73 9.67 (bc)
Supraspinatus 80.86 9.29 (bc)
Triceps brachii 70.79 7.52 (def)
Adductor 77.96 7.45 (def)
Biceps femoris 73.54 6.38 (f)
Gastrocneminus 75.39 8.15 (cde)
Gluteus medius 78.33 6.95 (ef)
Gluteus superrificialis 77.40 6.57 (ef)
Gracilis 66.59 7.45 (def)
Rectus femoris 74.44 7.08 (ef)
Semimembranosus 72.99 6.44 (ef)
Semitendinosus 67.46 7.02 (ef)
Vastus intermedius 72.45 11.88 (a)
Tensor fasciae latae 63.82 6.42 (f)
Vastus lateralis 76.43 6.67 (ef)
Longissimus dorsi 63.63 4.48 (g)

Muscles Calorie (cal/g)

Infraspanatus 1,739.70 (cde)
Pectoralis profundi (tube) 1,856.30 (abc)
Pectoralis profundi (fan) 1,755.20 (cde)
Brachiocephalicus 1,866.10 (abc)
Latissimus dorsi 1,935.50 (a)
Subscapularis 1,628.80 (efgh)
Supraspinatus 1,765.50 (bcde)
Triceps brachii 1,667.10 (defg)
Adductor 1,519.30 (hi)
Biceps femoris 1,732.40 (cde)
Gastrocneminus 1,773.40 (bcde)
Gluteus medius 1,689.30 (def)
Gluteus superrificialis 1,752.30 (cde)
Gracilis 1,583.00 (fgh)
Rectus femoris 1,423.40 (i)
Semimembranosus 1,583.10 (fgh)
Semitendinosus 1,799.60 (abcd)
Vastus intermedius 1,672.90 (defg)
Tensor fasciae latae 1,899.50 (ab)
Vastus lateralis 1,518.10 (hi)
Longissimus dorsi 1,545.30 (ghi)

(a-i) Means in the same column with different letters
are significantly different (p<0.05).

Table 4. Percentage of fatty acid for twenty-one pork muscles

Muscles Saturated Unsaturated

Infraspanatus 37.05 (abcd) 62.95 (abcd)
Pectoralis profundi (tube) 37.69 (abcd) 62.32 (abcd)
Pectoralis profund I (fan) 37.90 (ab) 62.10 (cd)
Brachiocephalicus 38.04 (ab) 61.96 (cd)
Latissimus dorsi 38.31 (a) 61.69 (d)
Subscapularis 37.71 (abc) 62.29 (bcd)
Supraspinatus 37.19 (abcd) 62.81 (abcd)
Triceps brachii 35.73 (d) 64.27 (a)
Adductor 36.09 (bcd) 63.91 (abc)
Biceps femoris 36.34 (abcd) 63.66 (abcd)
Gastrocneminus 35.84 (cd) 64.16 (ab)
Gluteus medius 37.64 (abcd) 62.37 (abcd)
Gluteus superrificialis 37.90 (ab) 62.10 (cd)
Gracilis 37.30 (abcd) 62.70 (abcd)
Rectus femoris 36.93 (abcd) 63.07 (abcd)
Semimembranosus 36.90 (abcd) 63.11 (abcd)
Semitendinosus 37.91 (ab) 62.09 (cd)
Vastus intermedius 36.75 (abcd) 63.25 (abcd)
Tensor fasciae latae 37.47 (abcd) 62.53 (abcd)
Vastus lateralis 36.69 (abcd) 63.31 (abcd)
Longissimus dorsi 38.09 (ab) 61.91 (cd)

Muscles Mono-unsaturated Poly-unsaturated

Infraspanatus 49.86 (abc) 13.09 (bcde)
Pectoralis profundi (tube) 49.49 (abc) 12.82 (bcde)
Pectoralis profund I (fan) 49.92 (abc) 12.18 (cde)
Brachiocephalicus 50.21 (abc) 11.75 (def)
Latissimus dorsi 49.56 (abc) 12.13 (cde)
Subscapularis 47.82 (c) 14.47 (ab)
Supraspinatus 50.01 (abc) 12.80 (bcde)
Triceps brachii 51.34 (ab) 12.94 (bcde)
Adductor 48.74 (bc) 15.17 (a)
Biceps femoris 51.64 (a) 12.03 (cde)
Gastrocneminus 50.65 (ab) 13.51 (abcd)
Gluteus medius 48.65 (bc) 13.72 (abc)
Gluteus superrificialis 49.94 (abc) 12.17 (cde)
Gracilis 50.99 (ab) 11.71 (def)
Rectus femoris 47.93 (c) 15.14 (a)
Semimembranosus 51.04 (ab) 12.06 (cde)
Semitendinosus 50.60 (ab) 11.49 (ef)
Vastus intermedius 50.01 (abc) 13.24 (bcde)
Tensor fasciae latae 50.35 (abc) 12.18 (cde)
Vastus lateralis 49.94 (abc) 13.38 (bcd)
Longissimus dorsi 51.59 (a) 10.32 (f)

(a-f) Means in the same column with different letters
are significantly different (p<0.05).
COPYRIGHT 2008 Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Kim, J.H.; Seong, P.N.; Cho, S.H.; Park, B.Y.; Hah, K.H.; Yu, L.H.; Lim, D.G.; Hwang, I.H.; Kim, D.H
Publication:Asian - Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:9SOUT
Date:Jan 1, 2008
Previous Article:Comparison of cholesterol-reduced cream cheese manufactured using crosslinked [beta]-cyclodextrin to regular cream cheese.
Next Article:Control of rumen microbial fermentation for mitigating methane emissions from the rumen *.

Related Articles
Heart healthy pork may be on the horizon.
BHJ is first choioe for BQAP.
Possible muscle fiber characteristics in the selection for improvement in porcine lean meat production and quality.
Effects of number of washes and ph adjustment on characteristics of surimi-like materials from pork leg muscle.
Effects of Dietary Glycine Betaine on growth and pork quality of finishing pigs.
Effects of age/weight and castration on fatty acids composition in pork fat and the qualities of pork and pork fat in Meishan x large white pigs.
Soy protein, gluten hydrolysates suppress oxidation in pork meat patties.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters