Characterization of a Strong Constitutive Promoter from Cotton Leaf Curl Kokhran Virus for High Level Gene Expression in Monocotyledonous and Dicotyledonous Plants.
The complementary sense rep gene (C1 rep) promoter of cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus (CLCuKoV) was cloned to assess its constitutive activity by expressing GUS gene both in dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants through agro-infiltration or by biolistic methods. Results showed higher GUS expression both in dicotyledonous (tobacco) and monocotyledonous (sugarcane and maize) plants mediated by the C1 rep promoter as compared to cauliflower mosaic virus promoter (CaMV 35S). This study further indicated that C1 rep promoter beside dicotyledonous plants could be used to achieve higher constitutive expression in monocotyledonous plants as well. Copyright 2014 Friends Science Publishers
Keywords: CI rep; GUS; Monocots; Dicots; Promoter; Agrobacterium; CaMV35SIntroduction
Plant genetic engineering has been widely used to engineer novel traits in plants. Plants have been increasingly used for the expression of therapeutic and other industrial proteins. These engineered plants often express transgenes constitutively by the use of strong promoters. The 35S promoter isolated from cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) is the most common promoter used in plant genetic engineering. In certain applications, promoters stronger than CaMV35S are desirable. Although CaMV 35S promoter has been extensively used in dicotyledonous plants, studies performed earlier reported low expression of CaMV35S in monocotyledonous plants, especially in sugarcane (Chowdhury and Vasil, 1992; Elliott et al., 1998; Liu et al.,2003). In certain applications it has been observed that the gene expression driven under CaMV35S is poor in phloemcells. Many examples are there where strong promoters may help in better expression like RNA interference based technologies, where the suppression of gene expression depends on levels of short interfering RNAs (siRNAs).Monocotyledonous plants have different physiologicalsystems as compared to dicotyledonous plants, therefore most of the time they respond differently from dicotyledonous plants. Such promoter system must be available with ability to express transgene in both kinds of crop plants. Recent trend in plant engineering is to express multiple genes for manipulation of several agronomic traits. In the first generation transgenic technology, a single gene is expressed, often driven by a strong promoter. In the second and third generation transgenic plants, two or more genes are being expressed for stacking multiple agronomic traits in transgenic crops (Halpin, 2005) which necessitate use of promoters with potentially higher activity.Geminiviruses are small single-stranded DNA viruses with circular genome and infect both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. The genome size ranges from2.6-2.8 kb with geminate capsid morphology (Hanley- Bowdoin et al., 1999). The four genera of geminiviruses including Mastrevirus, Topocuvirus, Curtovirus and Begomovirus are well characterized and are divided on the basis of host range, genome organization and insect vector (Van Regenmortel et al., 2000). Viruses of the genus Begomovirus mediate their transmission by whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) and infect only dicotyledonous plants. DNA A and DNA B are the two essential components of bipartite begomoviruses have their role in virus proliferation. Monopartite begomoviruses have only a single component equivalent to DNA A and are often associated with DNA satellites (Mansoor et al., 2003a). Previous studies demonstrated that both monopartite and bipartite begomoviruses have regions termed as large intergenic regions (LIR) and common regions, which contain DNA sequences essential for gene regulation (Hanley-Bowdoin et al., 1999).Transcription of the genomes of geminiviruses is bidirectional, initiating in the intergenic region. Transcription can be initiated in both directions, for the replication associated protein (rep) expression and the coat protein expression, both of which are controlled by geminivirus promoter. Rep sequences are associated with rolling circle amplification, being involved in viral replication as well as acting as a transcriptional repressor of its own expression by binding to the iterated elements located in the large intergenic region (Sunter et al., 1993; Hanley-Bowdoin et al., 1999). Intergenic region of geminiviruses located between 5' ends of complementary and virion sense Open Reading Frame (ORFs) is essential for bidirectional transcription of these genes (of complementary and virion sense) and significantly possesses promoter activity (Xie et al., 2003).Cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus (CLCuKoV) is a monopartite begomovirus that infects cotton and other dicotyledonous plants (Mansoor et al., 2003b). CLCuKoV is one of the several begomoviruses that are associated with the cotton leaf curl disease (Amrao et al., 2010). The activity of C1 rep gene promoter of CLCuKoV in dicotyledonous (tobacco) and monocotyledonous (maize and sugarcane) plants with GUS reporter gene was investigated. Quantitative GUS activity and comparison with cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter, the most commonly used gene promoter for plant genetic engineering was performed.
Materials and Methods
Promoter Isolation and Sequence Analysis
To isolate the promoter region from viral genome, CLCuKoV genomic DNA was extracted from infected plant leaves using CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle, 1990; Mansoor et al., 2003a). Sequence specific primers were designed and custom synthesized. Oligonucleotides used to amplify CLCuKoV promoter were P1 (5' GTTGACTAAAATTGAATCACC-3') as forward with the addition of SacI restriction site and P2 (5'- CAAACGCATACTTAGCAACG-3') as reverse primer with the addition of SalI restriction site. The product of 288 base pairs was amplified through PCR and cloned into pTZ57R/T (Fermentas, USA). The clone was custom sequenced to verify the DNA sequence of CLCuKoV C1Rep promoter.
Two expression vectors pGNCI Rep (CLCuKoV C1 Rep cloned in pGreen0029) and pGN35S (CaMV 35S promoter cloned in pGreen0029) for expression studies were constructed. For vector construction, a product of 288 bps of C1 Rep lifted from SacI and SalI restriction sites and cloned in pJIT166 vector. The expression cassette (3kb approx) containing CLCuKoV C1 Rep sequence, GUS reported gene and CaMV terminator lifted with SacI and XhoI restriction sites and cloned into pGreen0029 binary plant expression vector. Particle Bombardment
Particle bombardment to transfer DNA coated particles using Particle Delivery system (PDS-1000/He BioRad, USA) was performed. Before bombardment, rupture discs, micro-carriers, macro-carries holders and stopping screens were sterilized with 100% ethanol for 10 min followed by drying in contamination-free environment. For micro-carrier preparation, 3 mg of gold particles (1.0 m) for 6 bombardments were used and freshly prepared gold particles were coated with plasmid DNA and were delivered through PDS-1000/He. Absolute ethanol for coating gold particles with plasmid DNA was used. The bombarded tissues (callus) were kept in dark at 25oC in growth room for24 h before being processed for GUS staining.
Two plant expression vectors, pGNC1-Rep and pGN35S were electroporated into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 (Fiedle and Wirth, 1988). For Agro-inoculation, glycerol stocks of Agrobacterium harboring gene constructs were streaked on solid LB minimal medium plates containing antibiotics (50 g/L kanamycin, 25 g/L rifampicin, 50 g/L tetracycline) and incubated at 28oC for48 h. A single bacterial colony was picked with a sterile wire loop and incubated into 50 mL LB medium containing the required antibiotics and placed in a shaker (160 rpm) at28C until the OD600 of culture reached 1.0 (Hanley- Bowdoin et al., 1999). The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 8 min and resuspended in LB medium containing acetosyringone (final concentration 100 M). For agro-inoculation, Nicotiana benthamiana plants at4 to 5 leaf stage were selected and were not watered for 24 h before infiltration. Young leaves were infiltrated by gently pressing a 5 mL sterile syringe to the abaxial surface and depressing the plunger until water-soaked appearance was achieved.
GUS Assays and Histochemical GUS Staining
Histochemical GUS staining assays were performed for both constructs according to the Jefferson et al. (1987) method. Transient GUS expression studies were made 24 h after calli bombardment. Tissues were incubated at 37C overnight in dark in GUS substrate solution containing 1 mM X-Gluc, 50 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0, 0.05% Triton X-100 and 0.5 mM potassium ferricyanide. After incubation with GUS substrate, tissues were destained (in case of plant leaves) with 70% and eventually with 100% ethanol. Tissues were examined for GUS expression and photographed under stereomicroscope.
Sequence Homology of CLCuKoV C1 Rep
In present study, the 288 bps sequence of C1 Rep of CLCuKoV promoter was isolated, which showed potential promoter activity with GUS reporter gene. The PCR amplified DNA product was cloned in T/A cloning vector, sequenced and was 100% identical to CLCuKoV cloned from Faisalabad (Mansoor et al., 2003b).
Transient Expression Assay in Dicotyledonous Plant(Nicotiana benthamiana)
Transient expression assays were performed first in Nicotiana benthamiana plants to investigate the potential promoter activity of CLCuKoV C1 Rep in dicotyledonous plants. The viral promoter constructs pGNC1-Rep in comparison with pGN35S was agro-infiltrated into young leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana plants. Young and newly emerging leaves were selected. Three days after infiltration plant leaves were detached and were subjected to histochemical GUS staining. Histochemical GUS staining of infiltrated leaves showed higher GUS activity in leaves with pGNC1-Rep as compared to GUS expression with pGN35S (positive control), while no GUS expression was observed in leaves inoculated with culture without any construct as negative control (Fig. 1). Stereomicroscopic studies of agro- inoculated leaves further confirmed that pGNC1-Rep has stronger constitutive GUS expression as compared to PGN35S.
Transient Expression Assay in Monocotyledonous Plant(Zea mays)
The purpose of present study was to characterize a super strong promoter for monocotyledonous plant system. Transient GUS expression studies were performed in Zea mays to check the activity of CLCuKoV C1 Rep promoter in monocotyledonous plants. Transient assay was performed with two constructs pGNC1-Rep and pGN35S by agro- infiltration in leaves of Zea mays. Young and soft tissues were selected to ensure better infiltration of Agrobacterium culture. Infiltrated leaves were subjected to GUS staining assay 48 h after inoculation. Infiltration of Zea mays leaves with pGNC1-Rep and PGN35S (positive control) resulted in stronger GUS expression in leaves with pGNC1-Rep as number of blue foci were more as compared to mild and diffused GUS expression with pGN35S (Fig. 2). These results confirmed CLCuKoV C1 Rep promoter as a strong promoter, which can be used in monocotyledonous plants for higher gene expression.
Transient Expression Assay of C1-Rep in Saccharum officinarum
To assess the transient expression of GUS gene under CLCuKoV C1 Rep promoter in embryogenic calli of S. officinarum, particle bombardment was performed. The deliveries of transgenes (in this case pGNC1-Rep and pGN35S) into embryogenic calli tissues were mediated byDiscussion
The objective of the study presented here was to identify and characterize a viral promoter for strong expression as compared to CaMV35S promoter in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. The activity of C1 Rep gene promoter of CLCuKoV was investigated in dicotyledonous (tobacco) and monocotyledonous (maize and sugarcane) plants with GUS reporter gene. Histochemical GUS staining assays and comparison with cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter was performed. The expression of C1 Rep in tobacco was 4 to 5 fold higher than 35S promoter and is consistent with an earlier report by Xie at al. (2003), where CLCuMV C1 promoter was evaluated in dicots.After confirming strong promoter activity of C1 rep in dicotyledonous plants, further expression studies were performed using monocotyledonous plant system. Results for all the experiments confirmed strong constitutive promoter activity of C1 rep in monocotyledons plants as well. In comparison to CaMV35S, overall GUS expression was higher in maize leaves in all replicates (Fig. 2). Furthermore histochemical GUS staining assay studies of bombarded calli revealed C1 Rep as strong promoter in sugarcane calli as the number of blue foci of GUS with C1 Rep were higher than number of foci with CaMV35S promoter under stereomicroscopic studies (Fig. 3).Most reported plant viral promoters showed low activity in comparison to CaMV35S. Zhan et al. (1991) reported C1 promoter superior to V1 promoter in the absence of trans-activator in African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) and Wheat dwarf virus (WDV) [Hofer et al.,1992]. CLCuKoV C1 promoter superiority over the CaMV35S has special significance. Figwart mosaic virus (FMV) 34S and Tobacco golden mosaic virus (TGMV) coat protein promoters have 2-fold activity than that of CaMV35S (Verdaguer et al., 1996). Complementary-sense promoter of Tobacco yellow dwarf Mastrevirus of family Geminiviridae, was reported to show only 15-20% of the CaMV 35S promoter activity (Xu et al., 1998). As the efficient promoter activity of CaMV35S promoter is well established, for those plant systems with its reduced expression need to substitute with comparatively efficient transcription initiation sequences. For monocotyledonous plant system C1 Rep promoter superiority over theAcknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Nasir A. Saeed for expression studies, to Dr. Zahid Mukhtar for providing stereomicroscopic study facilities and Dr. Sohail Hameed and Mr. Muhammad Javed Iqbal for microscopy.
Amrao, L., I. Amin, M.S. Shahid, R.W. Briddon, S. Mansoor, 2010. Cotton leaf curl disease in resistant cotton is associated with single begomovirus that lacks an intact transcriptional activator protein. Virus Res, 152: 153163 Chowdhury, M.K.U. and I.K. Vasil, 1992. Stable transformed herbicide resistance callus of sugarcane via microprojectile bombardment of cell suspension cultures and electroporation of protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep., 11: 494498Doyle, J.J. and J.L. Doyle, 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue.Focus, 12: 1115Elliott, A.R., J.A. Campbell, R.I.S. Brettell and C.P.L. Grof, 1998.Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugarcane using GFP as a screenable marker. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 25: 739743Fiedle, S. and R. Wirth, 1988. Transformation of bacteria with plasmidDNA by electroporation. Anal. Biochem., 170: 3844Halpin, C., 2005. Gene stacking in transgenic plants the challenge for 21stcentury plant biotechnology. Plant Biotechnol. J., 3: 141155Hanley-Bowdoin, L., S.B. Settlage, B.M. Orozco, S. Nagar and D.Robertson, 1999. Geminiviruses: models for plant DNA replication, transcription, and cell cycle regulation. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 18: 71106Hofer, J.M., E.L. Dekker, H.V. Reynolds, C.J. Woolston, B.S. Cox andP.M. Mullineaux, 1992. Coordinate regulation of replication and virion sense gene expression on wheat dwarf virus. Plant Cell, 4:213223Jefferson, R.A., T.A. Kavanagh and M.W. Bevan, 1987. GUS fusions: betaglucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J., 6: 39013907Liu, D., S.V. Oard and J.H. Oard, 2003. High transgene expression levels insugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) driven by the rice ubiquitin promoter RUBQ2. Plant Sci., 165: 743750Mansoor, S., R.W. Briddon, Y. Zafar and J. Stanley, 2003a. Geminivirusdisease complexes an emerging threat. Trend. Plant Sci., 8: 128134 Mansoor, S., R.W. Briddon, S.E. Bull, I.D. Bedford, A. Bashir, M. Hussain, M. Saeed, Y. Zafar, K.A. Malik, C.M. Fauquet and P.G. Markham,2003b. Cotton leaf curl disease is associated with multiplemonopartite begomoviruses supported by single DNA. Arch. Virol.,148: 19691986Sunter, G., M.D. Hartitz and D.M. Bisaro, 1993. Tomato golden mosaic virus leftward gene expression: autoregulation of geminivirus replication protein. Virology, 195: 275280Van Regenmortel, M.H.V., C.M. Fauquet, D.H.L. Bishop, E.B. Carstens,M.K. Estes, S.M. Lemon, J. Maniloff, M.A. Mayo, D.J. McGeoch, C.R. Pringle and R.B. Wickner, 2000. 7th Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San DiegoVerdaguer, B., A. Kochko, R.N. Beachy and C. Fauquet, 1996. Isolation and expression in transgenic tobacco and rice plants, of the cassava vein mosaic virus (CVMV) promoter. Plant Mol. Biol., 31: 11291139Xie, Y., Y. Liu, M. Meng, L. Chen and Z. Zhu, 2003. Isolation and identification of a super strong plant promoter from cotton leaf curl Multan virus. Plant Mol. Biol., 53: 114Xu, Y., X. Zhan and B. Morris, 1998. Activity and its regulation of the bi directional promoter from tobacco yellow dwarf geminivirus. Chin. J. Virol., 14: 6874Zhan, X.C., A. Haley, K. Richardson and B. Morris, 1991. Analysis of the potential promoter sequences of African cassava mosaic virus by transient expression of the AY-glucuronidase gene. J. Gen. Virol., 72:28492852
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Rasul, Fiaz; Asad, Shaheen; Zafar, Yusuf; Mansoor, Shahid|
|Publication:||International Journal of Agriculture and Biology|
|Date:||Apr 30, 2014|
|Previous Article:||Two New Species of Family Acaridae Infesting Stored Products from District Gujranwala, Punjab, Pakistan.|
|Next Article:||Soil Health Indicators as Affected by Long-term Application of Farm Manure and Cropping Patterns under Semi-arid Climates.|