Printer Friendly

Characterization and alumina leachability of 12CaO x 7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] with different holding times.

1. Introduction

Calcium aluminate slag is obtained from blast furnaces when smelting iron-bearing bauxite or red mud. 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] is one of the main components from which alumina can be leached out [1, 2]. 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] attracts wide attention because it has better alumina leaching property than other CaO-[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] compounds in sodium carbonate solution [3, 4]. This method realizes the comprehensive utilization of iron and alumina values in the ore, and the alumina leaching rate is about 85% [5, 6].

In order to improve the alumina leaching ratio, many studies have been carried out. Tong et al. studied the microwave-assisted alumina leaching and indicated that it could promote the leaching process [7]. Sun et al. studied the ultrasonic-assisted alumina leaching and pointed that ultrasonic can improve the alumina leaching ratio and decrease the leaching temperature and sodium carbonation concentration [8]. Two-stage leaching and adding Na2O into slag to enhance leaching ratio were also used by Yu et al., and the results were also better [9].

The methods mentioned above improve the alumina leaching ratio of calcium aluminate slag to a certain extent. And most of these methods are to change the leaching condition. The crystal structure of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] has been widely researched because of its unique nanoporous framework, but all of the works are in the fields of material and cement [1013]. The relationship between crystal structure and alumina leaching ratio of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] has not been discussed from the literature.

Therefore, the synthesis of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] with raw materials of calcium oxide and alumina under the temperature of 1500[degrees]C during different holding time was carried out in this paper. The samples were leached under the same conditions. The microscopic characteristics of these samples were studied with the help of XRD and SEM.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials. CaC[O.sub.3], Na2C[O.sub.3], NaOH, and Al[(OH).sub.3] used in the experimental studies are analytically pure reagents. The C/A (CaO/[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3], mole ratio) of the 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] is 1.71.

2.2. Smelting of Calcium Aluminate. Samples were smelted in a Mo[Si.sub.2] resistance furnace with different synthesis time (from 30 min to 150 min, and the interval was 30 min), and the container was a graphite crucible. The smelting temperature was 1500[degrees]C (if the temperature is below 1500, it is difficult to depart the slag from liquid iron). The sample was taken out at 400[degrees]C from the resistance furnace, and its cooling rate was 5[degrees]C-[min.sup.-1]. Then, the sample was grinded into powders whose average particle sizes were within 74 [micro]m.

2.3. Leaching of Calcium Aluminate. The sodium aluminate solution obtained from leaching calcium aluminate was treated using the carbonization precipitation process, and the circulating liquid was then used to leach calcium aluminate. The feasible conditions for alumina leaching obtained from literature [6, 14] and our previous study were as follows: leaching temperature 75[degrees]C, leaching time 30 min, L/S ratio 10, caustic alkali concentration 7 g/L, and sodium carbonate concentration 120 g/L. The leaching experiments were carried out in magnetically stirred constant temperature water bath. After leaching and filtrating, the filtrate was used to analyze the composition of the solution, and the filter residue was washed and dried for analysis.

2.4. Analysis. The contents of [Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] and CaO in samples were analyzed by X-ray fluorescence, and the contents of [Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] and [Na.sub.2]O in filtrate were analyzed by chemical method. Phase components and crystal structure of the 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] were identified by X-ray diffraction (PANalytical PW3040/60). Scanning electron microscopy (SHIMADZU SSX-550) was used to observe the surface morphology of the 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Alumina Leachability of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] with Different Holding Times. 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] can easily react with [Na.sub.2]C[O.sub.3] solution and realize alumina recovery. The alumina leaching ratio is very important for the comprehensive utilization of iron-bearing bauxite and fly ash [15]. The reaction equation is shown as follows:

12CaO * 7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] + 12[Na.sub.2]C[O.sub.3] + 33[H.sub.2]O = 14NaAl[(OH).sub.4] + 12CaC[O.sub.3] + 10NaOH. (1)

The standard leaching conditions are mentioned in Section 2.3, and the leaching results are shown in Figure 1.

12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] has a good alumina leaching ratio (87.90%) when holding time is 30 min. When the holding time prolongs, the leaching ratio increases obviously. And it could reach 92.64% when holding time is 120 min. But it increases no longer when holding time is longer than 120 min. Compared to the previous research results [16], not only the sintering temperature but also the holding time has large influence on leaching ratio.

Although the sample is smelt and its reaction rate is much faster than solid reaction when the temperature is 1500[degrees]C, prolonged holding time is still a benefit to improve leaching ratio. The following analysis is carried out to study its effect mechanism.

3.2. XRD Results of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] with Different Holding Times. Phase components of sintered samples are the main factor which could affect the alumina leaching ability. The results are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 shows that the major phase of sample holding for 30 min is 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3], and the minor phase is CaO-[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3]. As to samples holding for more than 60 min, there is 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] only. According to the literature [4] alumina leaching property of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] is better than that of CaO-[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] (alumina leaching property of CaO- [Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] compounds: 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] > CaO-[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] > 3CaO- [Al.sub.2][O.sub.3]). This is one reason that alumina leaching ratio of sample holding for 30 min is lower than that of holding for more than 60 min. When holding time is above 60 min, it is difficult to study the effect mechanism of holding time on leaching ratio according to phase compositions. Therefore, further study is carried out.

3.3. Crystal Lattice of 12CaO7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] with Different Holding Times. XRD data of samples show that d value of Bragg diffraction changes regularly. Data of the first ten intensity peaks are shown in Table 1.

According to Table 1, the interplanar distance d of different (hkl) increases as the holding time prolongs. That is to say, the XRD pattern shifts to the left and the unit cell expands. The lattice constants of samples with different holding times are calculated by CELREF software, and the results are shown in Figure 3.

The trend of the increase of lattice constant is similar to that of alumina leaching ratio. The expansion of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] cell improves its leaching property. Grzymek [4] considered that the molecular structure of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] is as shown in Figure 4(a). There are six pyroaluminate groups [[Ca.sub.2]([Al.sub.2][O.sub.5])] for one part of [Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] in it. [Ca.sup.2+] and [O.sup.2-] of this structure are asymmetrically distributed. Hideo Hosono and other researchers [13,17,18] indicated that 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] is closely packed by subnanometer cages (Figure 4(b)), and its chemical formula is [[[Ca.sub.24][Al.sub.28][O.sub.64]].sup.4+] + 2[O.sup.2-] * [Ca.sup.2+] and [O.sup.2-] are also asymmetrical in structure. Therefore, the asymmetrical distribution of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] molecular makes that polar water molecules permeate in 12CaO-7[Al.sub.2] [O.sub.3] cell rapidly. The expansion of 12CaO-7[Al.sub.2] [O.sub.3] cell could intensify the asymmetrical distribution, so the alumina leaching ratio improves under this condition.

For covalent bounded crystal, the total interaction energy of each bond is as follows [19]:

u = [u.sub.0] + [u.sub.0] (r) - [], (2)

where [u.sub.0] is the energy that needed to establish hybridization state, [u.sub.0](r) is interaction energy between atoms, and it is reciprocal proportion to [r.sup.2], and [] is the lowest energy when cohesion of atoms takes place.

For one phase, [u.sub.0] and [] do not change. Therefore, the increase of unit-cell volume makes the bond energy of asymmetric structure weak and easy to break. Then, the reaction between 12CaO x 7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] and [Na.sub.2]C[O.sub.3] solution will become more violent and the alumina leaching ratio increases.

3.4. Average Crystallite Size of 12CaO x [Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] with Different Holding Times. The average crystallite size of 12CaO x 7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] is another aspect which will affect the alumina leaching ratio. In this paper, we use classical Scherrer [20, 21] (3) for crystallite size according to the FWHM of characteristic peaks of 12CaO x 7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3]:

d = k[lambda]/Bcos[theta], (3)

B = [([B.sup.2.sub.m] - [B.sup.2.sub.s]).sup.1/2], (4)

where d is the crystallite size, [lambda] is the X-ray wavelength (Cu target, [lambda] = 0.15406 nm), d is the Bragg angle, K is the Scherrer constant (K = 0.89, in this paper), and [B.sub.m] and [B.sub.s] are the FWHM of experimental sample and reference sample. The average crystallite size is obtained from the first ten strong peaks, and the results are shown in Table 2.

The average crystallite size of different samples is about 59 nm. That is to say, the holding time has little effect on the crystallite size of samples. Therefore, in this aspect, the holding time does not affect alumina leaching ratio.

3.5. Preferred Orientation of 12CaO7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] with Different Holding Times. Preferred orientation of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] crystal is another aspect which will affect the degree of leaching reaction. According to the XRD results, the relative intensity of characteristic peaks of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] changes with different holding times. The relative intensity data are shown in Table 3.

The crystal layer (420) is the first strongest characteristic peak of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3], and its relative intensity does not change with different holding times. But the relative intensity of the crystal layer (211) decreases obviously compared with the standard card. Therefore, the preferred orientation of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] changes with different holding times. The preferred orientation factors are calculated from (5) 22, 23]. The calculated results are shown in Figure 5:

[TC.sub.(hkl)j] = (I(hkl)j/I(hkl)j, 0)/(1/n)[[summation].sup.n.sub.i=1] (I (hkl) i/I (hkl) i, 0), (5)

where I[(hkl).sub.j] is the experimental diffraction intensity value of a crystal layer, I[(hkl).sub.j,0] is the diffraction intensity value of standard card, and n is the amount of peaks calculated.

Figure 5 shows that the first strongest orientation is (420) layer and the second is (211), and their preferred orientation factors decrease with the prolonging of holding time. When holding time changes from 60 min to 150 min, the orientation factor of (420) layer decreases from 1.191 to 0.918, and that of (211) layer decreases from 0.754 to 0.433. This is because the energy of the binary system tends to balance as holding time prolongs. The release of energy makes the enlargement of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] crystal lattice and disturbs its preferred orientation.

Besides, from Figure 6 (SEM results) it can be seen that, when holding time is shorter, the micromorphology of samples (30 min or 60 min) is present as a flake and smoothness structure. This is the result of the preferred orientation of crystal.

But the flake structure of samples (30 min or 60 min) are instead of gully and hole structure (120 min or 150 min) when holding time prolongs continuously. The images indicate that the preferred orientation of samples with long holding time is not obvious compared with that of samples with short holding time.

3.6. Microstructure of 12CaO-7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] with Different Holding Times. The SEM results of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] with different holding times are shown in Figure 6. According to these results, the sample synthesized during 30 min (Figure 6(a)) has large gullies and with scalariform marking in it. The gullies become smaller when holding time is 60 min but the scalariform marking increases (Figure 6(b)). Besides, small holes can be observed occasionally. Scalariform markings disappear and holes increase when holding time is 90min (Figure 6(c)). The combination of holes in adjacent takes place to form big gap when holding time is up to 120 min (Figures 6(d) and 6(e)). These gaps and the holes of different size distribute irregularly. The gaps become bigger and its amount become larger when holding time prolongs.

Another reason for the improvement of alumina leaching ability of 12CaO-7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] with long holding time is the existence of these holes and gaps. The aqueous solution can get into the solid easily and enhance the reaction between 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] and Na2C[O.sub.3] solution. From the reaction dynamics' point of view [24], the gaps and the holes of the unreacted core could promote the internal diffusion and the degree of liquid-solid reaction.

4. Conclusions

(1) The main phase of samples synthesized for different time is 12CaO * 7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3]. But the crystal structure of 12CaO * 7[Al.sub.2] [O.sub.3] is enlarged and the preferred oriented factor decreases with the increase of holding time.

(2) The micromorphology of samples synthesized for different times changes greatly. There are more and bigger holes in samples synthesized for longer time than that of short time.

(3) The comprehensive effects of phase compositions, lattice constant, preferred orientation, and surface morphology increase the alumina leaching ratio of 12CaO * 7[Al.sub.2] [O.sub.3] synthesized for long holding time.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors greatly acknowledge the financial support of the National Nature Science Foundation of China (no. 51104053) and the National Nature Science Foundation of Hebei Province (no. E2012208047).


[1] L. K. Barr, Alumina Production from Andalusite by the Pedersen Process, Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, Sweden, 1977.

[2] J. Grzymek, A. Derdacka, Z. Konik, and B. Werynski, "Method for obtaining aluminum oxide," US Patent, Application 880004, 1979.

[3] J. Grymek, "Complex production of aluminium oxide and iron from laterite raw materials applying the calcium aluminates polymorphism," in Proceedings of the Light Metals, p. 87, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1985.

[4] A. D. Grzymek, J. Grzymek, and Z. Konik, "The new way of alumina lixiviation from sinters containing 12CaO.7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] in J. Grzymek's method," in Proceedings of the Light Metals, p. 132, Phoenix, Ariz, USA, 1988.

[5] J. D. Zhang, Y. T Li, S. W. Bi, and Y. Y. Hong, "Research on integrated utilization of high-ferrum bauxite in Guigang Guangxi," Light Metals, no. 2, pp. 16-18, 1992.

[6] S. W. Bi, Y. H. Yang, Y. T Li, J. D. Zhang, and Z. Y. Duan, "Study ofalumina leaching from calcium aluminate slag," Light Metals, no. 6, pp. 10-15, 1992.

[7] Z. Tong, S. Bi, and Y. Yang, "Leaching behavior of calcium aluminate slag from blast furnace under microwave radiation heating," Journal of Northeastern University, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 148-151, 2005.

[8] H. L. Sun, H. Y. Yu, B. Wang, and G. F. Tu, "Study on enhanced ultrasonic leaching of 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3]," Journal of Northeastern University, vol. 29, no. 12, p. 1729, 2009.

[9] H. Y. Yu, X. L. Pan, B. Wang, W. Zhang, H. L. Sun, and S. W. Bi, "Effect of [Na.sub.2]O on formation of calcium aluminates in CaO-[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3]-Si[O.sub.2] system," Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 3108-3112, 2012.

[10] S.-W. Kim, S. Matsuishi, M. Miyakawa, K. Hayashi, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, "Fabrication of room temperature-stable 12CaO * 7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] electride: a review," Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 5-14, 2007

[11] H. Hosono, K. Hayashi, and M. Hirano, "Active anion manipulation for emergence of active functions in the nanoporous crystal 12CaO*7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3]: a case study of abundant element strategy," Journal of Materials Science, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1872-1883, 2007

[12] Y. J. Park and Y. J. Kim, "Effects of crystal structures on luminescent properties of Eu doped Ca-Al-O systems," Ceramics International, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1109-1112, 2008.

[13] A. Chatterjee, M. Nishioka, and F. Mizukami, "A periodic first principle study to design microporous crystal 12MO, 7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] for selective and active O- radicals encaging," Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 390, no. 4-6, pp. 335-339, 2004.

[14] S. W. Bi, Z. F. Tong, H. L. Li, and Y. H. Yang, "Leaching kinetics of calcium aluminate slag," The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 399-402, 2005.

[15] S. Auer, H. J. Kuzel, H. Pollmann, and F. Sorrentino, "Investigation on MSW fly ash treatment by reactive calcium aluminates and phases formed," Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1347-1359, 1995.

[16] B. Wang, H. Yu, H. Sun, and S. Bi, "Effects of sintering process parameters on physicochemical properties of calcium aluminate slag system," The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 949-952, 2008.

[17] H. Hosono, S. W. Kim, M. Miyakawa, S. Matsuishi, and T. Kamiya, "Thin film and bulk fabrication of room-temperature-stable electride C12A7:e- utilizing reduced amorphous 12CaO * 7[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3](C12A7)," Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 354, no. 19-25, pp. 2772-2776, 2008.

[18] P. V. Sushko, A. L. Shluger, K. Hayashi, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, "Localisation assisted by the lattice relaxation and the optical absorption of extra-framework electrons in 12CaO x [Al.sub.2][O.sub.3]," Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 25, no. 5-8, pp. 722-726, 2005.

[19] B. L. Gu and X. K. Wang, Solid State Physics, Tsinghua Press, Beijing, China, 1989.

[20] A. W. Burton, K. Ong, T. Rea, and I. Y. Chan, "On the estimation of average crystallite size of zeolites from the Scherrer equation: a critical evaluation of its application to zeolites with one-dimensional pore systems," Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 117, no. 1-2, pp. 75-90, 2009.

[21] V. Uvarov and I. Popov, "Metrological characterization of Xray diffraction methods for determination of crystallite size in nano-scale materials," Materials Characterization, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 883-891, 2007.

[22] Q. Y. Feng, Research on prepation of Ni-[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] nanocomposite coatings and its properties [Dissertation], Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China, 2008, (Chinese).

[23] L. H. Ri, Preparation and doping of BiFe[O.sub.3] film by sol-gel process and study on the electric and magnetic properties [Dissertation], Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 2006, (Chinese).

[24] L. de Windt and R. Badreddine, "Modelling of long-term dynamic leaching tests applied to solidified/stabilised waste," Waste Management, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1638-1647, 2007

(1) School of Material Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China

(2) Hebei Key Laboratory of Material Near-Net Forming Technology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Bo Wang;

Received 23 May 2014; Accepted 26 June 2014; Published 20 July 2014

Academic Editor: Peter Majewski

TABLE 1: d values in X-ray diffraction of samples with different
holding times.

Peak                                    d
serial   (hkl)   30 min    60 min    90 min    120 min   150 min

1        (420)   2.67705   2.67824   2.67941   2.68201   2.68341
2        (211)   2.88512   4.88624   4.88508   4.89433   4.89955
3        (422)   2.44436   2.44539   2.44624   2.44887   2.44925
4        (521)   2.18660   2.18789   2.18803   2.18995   2.19073
5        (532)   1.94395   1.94407   1.94395   1.95581   1.96628
6        (400)   2.99582   2.99643   2.99735   2.99929   2.99938
7        (642)   1.60087   1.60160   1.60212   1.60296   1.60298
8        (640)   1.66104   1.66184   1.66249   1.66353   1.66376
9        (321)   3.19956   3.20032   3.20122   3.20449   3.20686
10       (750)   1.39310   1.39352   1.39376   1.39454   1.39464

The relative peak intensities decrease as the serial number increases.

TABLE 2: Average crystallite size of samples synthesized for
different times.

Holding time    30      60      90      120     150

dave (nm)      59.48   59.67   59.06   59.35   59.57

TABLE 3: Relative intensity of X-ray diffractions and standard card.

hkl           Experimental Rel.Int. (%)       Standard
      60 min    90 min    120 min   150 min   Rel.Int.

420    100       100        100       100       100
211   60.12     66.51      68.12     68.23       95
422   50.61     45.08      42.26     57.32       50
400    28.9     28.99      32.33     42.83       45
642   25.25     30.99      27.12     33.56       30
750   12.88     13.39      13.21     17.22       18
COPYRIGHT 2014 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Sun, Hui-lan; Wang, Bo; Zhang, Jian-xin; Zong, Shu-feng
Publication:Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Article Type:Report
Date:Jan 1, 2014
Previous Article:Evaluation of the response of posttensioned steel frames with energy dissipators using equivalent single-degree-of-freedom systems.
Next Article:The research of degradation about 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene by the artificial media in microbe enrichment.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters