Challenges in licensing the industrial double-rig trawl fisheries in Brazil/Desafios en el licenciamiento de la pesca de arrastre industrial tangonera en Brasil.
Licensing of fishing vessels is one of the several tools used by governmental authorities under the fishing regulation process. In some instances, it might represent only a bureaucratic step aiming at registering the units engaged in the fishery for statistical or control purposes (Pope, 2005). On the other hand, it may stand also for a key mechanism to limiting access (or to grant rights), to fishing grounds, and resources (Charles, 2005). If properly enforced, in combination with catch, effort and/or technical measures, (e.g., Doulman, 1987; Harte & Barton, 2007; Havice, 2010), generates government revenues and/or contribute for the biological and socioeconomic sustainability of marine fisheries (Charles, 2005; Pope, 2005; but see Pearse, 1981 for a discussion on the inefficacy of licensing as a tool for controlling fleet capacity, and Fahy (2008) and Shen & Heino (2014), for examples of enforcement limitations).
In Brazil, license requirement for fishing vessels have appeared in federal regulations at least since the Fishing Code of 1938 (Brasil, 1938), substituted in 1967 by the Decree-Law 221/67 (Brasil, 1967) and, more recently, by the Fishing Law of 2009 (Brasil, 2009). All commercial fishing vessels, regardless whether artisanal or industrial, are required to have a license. Licenses are discretionary, precarious, individual, non-transferable and subjected to a quasiautomatic annual renewal if payment of a small tax and complying with some other legal requisites are proven (e.g., regularity with "PREPS", the national vessel monitoring system program, which is obligatory for all industrial vessels and part of the artisanal fleets).
In spite of appearing in the 1950's, the Brazilian industrial fishery developed significantly only from the 1960s on, fueled by intensive governmental financial incentives provided under the Decree-Law of 1967 (Diegues, 1983). The southeastern-south region is a large marine fishing management area (extending from 18[degrees]20'S to the Brazilian border with Uruguay), where most of the country's industrial fisheries concentrates. Fleets were originally directed to a few target-species, defined as such by their production (i.e., sardine Sardinella brasiliensis, caught by purse seiners), acceptance in the internal market (i.e., scienid fishes, targeted by stern and pair trawlers), or high intrinsic economic value (i.e., shrimps, exploited by side trawlers until 1968-1969, when they were converted to double-rig trawlers) (Valentini & Pezzuto, 2006).
At first, the industrial shrimp fishery operating in the southeastern-south Brazil targeted only the valuable pink-shrimps Farfantepenaeus paulensis and F brasiliensis, caught in shelf bottoms between 30 and 80 m depth. The number of vessels in this fleet increased dramatically from nearly 75 units in 1966 to more than 400 in 1972. As a consequence of this huge increment in fishing effort, shrimp yields and fleet size declined rapidly thereafter and the stocks were successively diagnosed as overexploited since 1973 (Valentini et al., 1991, 2012; D'Incao et al., 2002; Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, 2004). Simultaneously, an additional industrial fleet aiming at the sea-bob shrimp Xiphopenaeus kroyeri (hitherto exploited only by artisanal fishers up to 30 m depth) also developed, motivated by the reduction in pink-shrimp yields and increasing in sea-bob shrimp prices in the international market (Valentini & Pezzuto, 2006). After peaking at 15,591 ton in 1981, landings of this species declined to only 5,495 ton in 1999 (D'Incao et al., 2002). Since 2004, the species has been officially recognized as at risk of overexploitation (Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, 2004).
The scenario of the pink-shrimp fishery worsened after 1985, when the fleet size increased again to nearly 400 units (D'Incao et al., 2002; Valentini & Pezzuto, 2006). Additionally, in the same year, a third double-rig fleet started to operate in Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul states (Southern Brazil), focusing mostly on the coastal Argentine stiletto shrimp Artemesia longinaris (Bate) and Argentine red shrimp Pleoticus muelleri (Bate), flatfishes (Paralichthys patagonicus Jordan) and angel sharks (Squatina spp.) (Haimovici, 1998).
During the 1980's and the following decades, the two first double-rig fleets showed a progressive diversification in their dynamics. Two compensatory strategies were established to overcome the pink and sea-bob shrimp overexploitation: (1) to retain and focus on several other fishes and invertebrates caught as by-catch of traditional resources (Kotas, 1998; Perez & Pezzuto, 1998; Perez et al., 2001, 2007; Tomas & Cordeiro, 2007; Tomas et al., 2007); and (2), by expanding fishing areas to the outer shelf and slope, where new valuable targets and by-catches, started to be exploited (Perez et al., 2001; Perez & Pezzuto, 2006). The two strategies, allied to the poor selectivity of the bottom trawling have made the double-rig fisheries in the region to be largely multi-specific. In fact, the number of commercial categories of fishes and invertebrates landed by the combined double-rig fleets in Santa Catarina state during 2012 surpassed 82 items, several of them comprising more than a single species (e.g., the generic denomination "sharks") (UNIVALI/CTTMar, 2013).
Not only had the fleet dynamics of the double-rig fleets changed with time in the region. Licensing also showed significant modifications, this might be separated in three main phases. The first, encompassed the beginning of the industrial shrimp fisheries until the early 2000s, when licenses were defined under a monospecific perspective. Vessels were permitted to catch pink and sea-bob shrimps with their respective "incidental catches" (not specifically referred in the respective licenses). However, the importance of the latter increased with time at the same rate that the abundance of the targets declined. Because vessels, authorized to catch shrimps, expanded their operations to new areas and/or resources, and many other trawlers (new or converted from other fisheries) were unsuccessful to get shrimp licenses as their distribution was legally closed. Fishing authorities were pushed politically to accommodate both situations. License characteristics started, then, to become more flexible. At the same time that some licenses remained unchanged, in content, others became progressively more generic and embracing, up to a point where some of them allowed the exploitation, in the whole southeastern-south region, of "fishes, crustaceans and mollusks in general, excluding resources under control" (i.e., excluding species for which new licenses were not available, as the pink-shrimp). Considering the large area of operation permitted, including the traditional sea-bob and pink-shrimp fishing grounds, the poor selectivity of the fishing method and the variety of licenses in force, this system enabled the operation of the double-rig vessels in any area, at any time and on any species (including resources under control, supposedly caught as by-catch). It represents nothing less than a disguise of an open-access regime (Valentini & Pezzuto, 2006).
After severe criticism and aiming at reorganizing the licensing process, in 2011 the Brazilian Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture launched a new licensing system (Brasil, 2011), to which all fishing vessels should adhere. Licenses were standardized and formally defined according to five criteria: a) fishing method, b) target species, c) incidental catches of marketable species, d) incidental catches of not marketable species whether due to legal, economic, or other constraints; and e) area of operation permitted. Scientific and vernacular names for the species listed in criteria b), c), and d) above, are formally included in the authorizations.
In this new system, licenses that were previously quite generic turned to be extremely specific and detailed, paradoxically, trying to accommodate the multi-specific feature of the current fisheries through the definition of a long and partially different list of species in each type of authorization. Given the high marine biodiversity of the southeastern-south Brazilian region (see Fig. 9 in Miloslavich et al., 2011) and considering the unselective character of the double-rig bottom trawling fisheries, this change posed new challenges to the management and to the fishing industry as a whole.
Therefore, this paper aims at examining the behavior of the three most important industrial double-rig fleets operating in southeastern-south region of Brazil, as viewed from landings monitored in Santa Catarina harbors between 2008 and 2010. The landings of each fleet was analyzed and confronted with the criteria set out in the new licensing system, in order to verify to what extent this system suit to current fishing reality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
As information of individual fishing licenses was not made available to the public by the Brazilian government until very recently, the Syndicate of Ship-owners and Fishing Industries of Itajai and Region (SINDIPI) and Syndicate of Fishing Industry of Florianopolis (SINDIFLORIPA) kindly provided us with copies of licenses of all 234 double-rig vessels of their affiliated members. Nearly all industrial vessels based on Santa Catarina State are associated to one of these syndicates and they represent a significant part of the industrial double-rig fleet operating in southeastern-south region (i.e., 80.7%, 51.3%, and 74.0% of the total number of vessels licensed, respectively, to catch demersal fishes, pink and sea-bob shrimps). Licenses were used to discriminate vessels according to the new licensing system (Table 1), and also to identify and retrieve the corresponding landing information stored in Santa Catarina Industrial Fishing Statistics Program database. This program is conducted by the University of Vale do Itajai since 2000 and monitors landed catch (composition, weight, and ex-vessel prices), effort, and fishing areas of all industrial fleets which operate in Santa Catarina harbors through logbooks, sales records, and skippers' interviews. Quite frequently, vessels based on other states use local harbors for landing, but their data were not considered in this study, because the respective licenses were not known. From the 234 vessels affiliated to the syndicates, 191 landed in Santa Catarina during the study period.
Vessels authorized to fish pink-shrimp were separated according to the method of catch storage on board (crushed ice or cold chambers-freezers), as SINDIPI's technical staff suggested that they could have different operational characteristics (e.g., days at the sea), influencing the respective catch composition. Data on total length and power of the main engine were obtained from licenses and used to provide basic physical characteristics of the fleets.
Spatial distribution of the total fishing effort was also analyzed for each fleet. Firstly, fishing areas visited in each trip, as informed by the skippers during interviews or pointed out in the respective log books were ascribed to a 30'x30' grid. More than a single quadrant could be assigned, as more than frequently a same trip covered several quadrants (i.e., fishing grounds extended for very large areas along the shelf). The total number of trips recorded by quadrant during the whole study period was then calculated and mapped for each fleet.
Two main analyses were conducted from landing data: a) catch was examined in terms of weight and revenue per biological species/commercial categories and b) catch was broken down into the categories "target-species" and "expected by-catch", as defined in the respective licenses (Table 1). Landed items not listed in the authorizations were classified as "others". Correspondence between vernacular and scientific names of all species mentioned in this paper can be found in Table 2.
The proportion by weight and by revenue, measured in Brazilian currency, (Reais R$, conversion rate of US$1.00 = R$1.70 in December 1st, 2010) that each item accounted for, in relation to the total landings of each fleet, was calculated per year, and for the whole study period, to investigate their role in the maintenance of the respective fishing fleets.
To enable proper comparison of revenues, along the three studied years, monthly mean prices (US$/kg) of each species were corrected for inflation to the reference date of December 2010. The Producer Price Index (PPI) (Indice de Pre?os ao Produtor Amplo-Fundacao Getulio Vargas, 2012), which records the monthly variation of prices of agricultural and industrial goods at the producer level, i.e. before final marketing, was used. Mean ex-vessel price (Price US$/kg) of the species/commercial category i in the month/year j was, standardized as follows:
[Corrected price.sub.ij] = [Price.sub.ij] x ([PPI.sub.December2010]/[PPI.sub.j])
A total of 2,617 trips and 46,711 ton were monitored in the study period. From the 191 vessels analyzed, 68 were licensed for pink-shrimp. They used crushed ice as catch conservation method (hereafter referred to as pink-shrimp icing vessels). Sea-bob shrimp and demersal fish fleets totalized 47 and 44 units, respectively. Only 32 pink-shrimp vessels were equipped with cold chambers (pink-shrimp freezers; Table 3). The demersal fish fleet showed mean yields/trip much higher than those exhibited by the other vessels and accounted for 54.5% of the total landings. Excepting for the number of trips which reduced from 2008 to 2010 in all fleets, the other variables did not show important changes in the period (Table 3).
As revealed by Kruskal-Wallis tests, the fleets differed both in their median lengths (H = 114.7; N = 192; P < 0.0001) and engine power (H = 101.9; N = 190; P < 0.0001). A post-hoc test showed that vessels targeting sea-bob shrimp were the smallest (median total length = 14.8 m) as compared to the other fleets (P < 0.0001). Pink shrimp freezers and vessels targeting demersal fishes on the other hand did not show differences among them (P = 0.96) but were bigger than the other vessels (P < 0.01). The same results were found when contrasting median engine power among the fleets. In this case, differences among pink shrimp freezers + demersal fish vessels and the other fleets were even more significant (P < 0.001) (Table 4).
As previously suspected, the use of crushed ice instead of cold chambers limits the permanence of the vessels at the sea. On average, fishing trips of pink-shrimp icing vessels lasted only 18.5 days, contrasting with the 34.5 days spent by the pink-shrimp freezer fleet (Table 5). Haul duration and number of hauls per day differed also between the two pink-shrimp fleets, freezers conducting less and longer hauls per day. Seabob shrimp vessels showed the lowest autonomy among the four fleets spending, on average, 17 days at sea. Their hauls were also the shortest (mean = 4.0 h), resulting in a higher number of tows per day (Table 5).
Spatial distribution of fishing effort
Freezers operate from north of Vitoria to the border with Uruguay, mostly in fishing grounds shallower than 100 m. However, areas between 100 and 200 m deep or even down to the slope were also exploited, mainly between Santos e Itajai harbors. The area between Itajai and Paranagua concentrated the highest number of trips per quadrant (Fig. 1a). Effort of the pink-shrimp icing fleet was much more spread, occupying all the continental shelf and upper slope from Rio de Janeiro to the border with Uruguay. Trips concentrated in two main areas: towards the north of Itajai, between 50 and 100-200 m isobaths, and towards the south of the same harbor, in shallower waters (Fig. 1b). The sea-bob shrimp fleet showed also a continuous occupation of the continental shelf, though rarely exceeding 100 m deep. In fact, most of the trips concentrated in very coastal areas below 50 or even 25 m deep, especially between Cananeia and Santos harbors. This fleet rarely, if ever, operated on slope grounds (Fig. 1c). Spreading its fishing effort essentially throughout the same areas where pink-shrimp icing vessels operate, demersal fish fleet exploited two main fishing grounds: the first, situated along the outer shelf and slope between Santos and Laguna and the second, on the inner shelf from Laguna towards the southern end of the study area (Fig. 1d).
Catch composition per species or category
From the main resources landed by the double-rig fleets in Santa Catarina, the pink-shrimp stands out as the most valuable, with mean prices per kilogram exceeding twice the southern white shrimp, which ranked second on the price scale (Table 6). Complement the "top ten" items in terms of intrinsic value other three shrimps: the Uruguayan lobster, squid and flatfish, all species exploited on the continental shelf, and the monkfish and codling caught on the slope (Table 6). Although price fluctuations had been noticed throughout the study period, no definite pattern was observed. Whereas the price of pink and Argentine stiletto shrimps decreased from 2008 to 2010, other species showed continuous appreciation in the same period (e.g., Uruguayan lobster) or were valued differently in each year (Table 6).
Examining the catch composition per fleet revealed some distinct patterns among them. The pink-shrimp freezers landed 56 species/categories, but only ten accounted for over 81% of the total weight and 96% of revenue (Table 7). The fleet showed to be essentially shellfish-oriented as four shrimp species, the squid and the Uruguayan lobster comprised six out of the ten main items landed in terms of value, with the pink-shrimp demonstrating, by far, the largest importance. Mixture (a multi-species assortment of items of low individual value) amounted 19% of the total weight, a value very close to the pink-shrimp contribution (22%). Landings totalized 2,154 ton and more than US$10 million in the study period.
Pink-shrimp icing vessels showed a more diversified pattern, as 68 species/categories were landed and 13 of them were necessary to generate, respectively, 82 and 90% of the landed weight and revenue monitored in the period (Table 8). While revenues from the pink-shrimp summed 77% in freezer vessels, its importance decreased to 35% in the icing fleet (corresponding to only 4% of the landed weight), with other shrimps increasing their participation in the fleet economy. The Argentine stiletto shrimp and mixture were the most abundant items in the landings. Fleet's revenues and landed weight exceeded US$22 million and 11,500 ton in the study period, respectively.
Among 50 species/categories recorded, only seven of them provided 95% of the landings and revenues for the sea-bob shrimp fleet (Table 9). In spite of being traditionally the fleet's main target, landed weight and revenue obtained from the sea-bob shrimp figured below the Argentine stiletto shrimp, whose landings accounted for 50% of the total. Conversely, given its lower individual price as compared to the sea-bob shrimp (Table 6), the contribution of the Argentine stiletto shrimp in the total revenue was only marginally superior. The Argentine red shrimp, which is caught in association with the latter species in coastal fishing grounds southwards from the main sea-bob shrimp area of distribution, showed also significant importance, accounting for 11% of the volume and 20% of the revenue in the period. These two southern shrimps, therefore, revealed to play a key role in the current dynamics of the sea-bob shrimp fleet, whose total landings in the period attained 7,549 ton and US$12.1 million (Table 9).
As expected, fishes were the main items caught by the demersal fishes fleet, with nine species plus the "not discriminated" category accounting for over 77% of the weight and 81% of the revenue (Table 10). Among the 68 species/categories landed, codling, flatfish, Argentine hake, and bluewing searobin were dominant in both criteria. In spite of contributing with only 7% of the landed weight, flatfishes corresponded to 18% of the total fleet's revenues (US$29.6 million), given its high individual value (US$3.09 [kg.sup.-1]) as compared to the other three species (e.g., codling--US$1.26 kg'1) (Tables 6-10).
Catch composition according to the license system
In the pink-shrimp freezer fleet, nearly 80% of revenues were obtained from the target-species (as defined in the respective licenses), in spite of their very small participation in terms of volume (Fig. 2). This difference is explained by the predominance of the valuable pink-shrimp in the landings, mostly when compared to the two other possible targets (i.e., Argentine red and stiletto shrimps), whose amount and individual prices were significantly lower (Tables 6, 7). In terms of weight, the most important category was the "expected by-catch" which attained, in 2010, nearly 50% of the total landings. Species not listed in the licenses had also a significant participation in terms of weight, in spite of representing less than 5% of the revenues (Fig. 2).
Targets were also the main items for the economic sustainability of the pink-shrimp icing fleet, even considering that their importance in the total revenue declined to ca. 60%. Considering the whole study period, targets and expected by-catch species had similar contribution in terms of weight, although different patterns had been observed from year to year. Nearly 20% of the landings corresponded to items not included in the licenses, but, as observed in the pink-shrimp freezer fleet, their input to the total revenue was small (Fig. 3).
Sea-bob shrimp fleet revealed totally reliant from the three shrimp listed as targets, as they represented nearly 90% of the respective landings and revenues. The remaining 10% were equally divided between the other two categories (Fig. 4). On the other hand, demersal fish vessels were sustained mostly by species not listed in their respective licenses as nearly 50% of the landings and revenue originate from their catches (Fig. 5). Targets contribution in weight and revenue varied between ca. 20 and 30% and between 30 and 40%, respectively, depending on the year. Comparatively, species listed as expected by-catch always a played smaller role for this fleet (Fig. 5).
Although differing as to the dependence on the categories "targets", "expected by-catch", and "others", the four fleets presented a high percentage of coincidental species. Comparing the species listed in the three types of licenses, the percentage of coincidental items varied from a minimum of 31.8% between sea-bob shrimp and demersal fish fleets to a maximum of 71.1% between the latter and the pinkshrimp fleets (Table 11). When considering the landings actually performed between 2008 and 2010, the overlapping in catch composition increased significantly, reaching 82.4% between demersal fishes and pink-shrimp icers fleet (Table 11).
In force since 2011, the new Brazilian fishing licensing scheme has produced some beneficial outcomes, standardizing licenses, characteristics, and increasing the control and transparency in the system as a whole. However, the present results reveal that, at least concerning the bottom industrial double-rig fisheries, this system has not reverted neither the excessive effort and overlapping among fleets, nor the quite generalist access rights conferred by the preceding collection of non-standardized licenses which, among other negative consequences, posed the sustainability of the exploited demersal stocks on a high level of risk.
As demonstrated by Table 11, in spite of defining different targets (except by the Argentine red and stiletto shrimps, to be commented below), actually, a high proportion of species appear repeatedly in the three licenses examined. In combination with the same permitted fishing areas and with the absence of legally established limits for the proportion that target and predicted by-catch species can attain in landings of each fleet, this fact opens the possibility of vessels operate opportunistically over much the same resources, irrespective of their license type. The very high percentage of common species which were effectively landed by the different fleets during the study period confirms this (Table 11).
The inclusion of the Argentine red and stiletto shrimps as targets for all vessels pertaining both to the pink and sea-bob shrimp fleets illustrates the consequence of having species in common in different licenses. Directed catches of these species have increased mostly from the middle 1990's on, when the overcapitalized pink-shrimp fleet based in Santa Catarina started to exploit them as compensatory resources, in addition to a small-scale fleet which was already present in Rio Grande do Sul. Such fact has originated an abundant and seasonal fishery conducted on inner shelf waters extending from Southern Santa Catarina towards the border between Brazil and Uruguay (Perez et al, 2001; D'Incao et al., 2002; Valentini & Pezzuto, 2006). Maximum Sustainable Yields (MSY) of these species were estimated for Brazilian waters only by Baptista-Metri (2007), and attained 4,447.3 ton [yr.sup.-1] and 3,579.4 ton [yr.sup.-1] for the Argentine red and stiletto shrimps, respectively. Whereas historical landings of the first species were always below the MSY, in the case of the stiletto shrimp, it was exceeded at least in 2000, 2003, 2004, 2008 and 2009 (Baptista-Metri, 2007; Beninca, 2013). Fishing effort directed to these shrimps has been considered excessive (Baptista-Metri, 2007; Dumont & D'Incao, 2008) and concerns about the risk of recruitment overfishing of the latter species were recently raised on a study by Dumont et al. (2011).
As compared to other shelf and slope bottom-trawl fisheries conducted on Southeastern-South Brazilian waters, which developed a progressive multi-specific behavior, the industrial sea-bob shrimp fishery maintained a mono-specific characteristic in terms of targets, at least up to late 1990's-early 2000's (Valentini & Pezzuto, 2006). In fact, Gra?a-Lopes et al. (2002a) studied the sea-bob shrimp industrial fleet which landed in Sao Paulo during 1988 and found by-catch species having a much lower importance than the target in the landings. Higher proportions of other species were found only in a few situations when the production of the sea-bob shrimp declined. The present paper shows, however, that multi-specificity is also emerging in this fleet as more than a half of the its landings and revenues originated from the Argentine red and stiletto shrimps, whereas the sea-bob shrimp contributed, respectively, with only 29% and 34%.
The sea-bob shrimp stock has not been assessed since D'Incao et al. (2002). However, it can be argued that redirecting effort for the Argentine red and stiletto shrimps in the recent years may be a response to declining biomass observed for the species in the 1990's decade. Even considering the very seasonal availability of the two southern shrimps (Baptista-Metri, 2007) and their strong inter-annual fluctuation in abundance due to environmental causes (Dumont et al., 2011), the SBS fleet reveals to be highly dependent on these "new" resources. In addition, it is noteworthy that even presenting the pink-shrimp as the main target, the pink-shrimp icing fleet has also the southern shrimps as key resources contributing, together, with 27% of the revenues and 35% of the landings.
Making the Argentine red and stiletto shrimp official targets for all vessels pertaining to the sea-bob and pink-shrimp fleets cannot be considered a precautionary measure. Given that no catch or effort limits do exist for both species in Brazil, this measure threatens not only the biological sustainability of the respective stocks, but also the economic survivorship of the vessels that currently rely on these shrimps (Tables 8, 9). In addition, declining yields as resulting from a potential overexploitation or collapse of these stocks could intensify the compensatory strategy adopted by both fleets, augmenting their overlapping and, consequently, contributing for developing additional scenarios of effort concentration over other resources.
Regarding the demersal fish vessels, three main aspects deserve attention: a) in contrary to what would be expected, the most important category in their landings was neither the target nor the incidental species, but the "others" not listed in their respective licenses; b) codling, a species pertaining to the latter category, was the main item in landing and in revenue, and c) four of the most important species for this fleet (codling, Brazilian codling, flatfish and bluewing searobin) accounted for 20% of the pink-shrimp icing landings, indicating a significant catch similarity between them. While part of the dominance of the "other" category could be explained by eventual omissions in the list of species as defined by the fishing authority, actually, most of the discrepancies result from operations conducted below the 250 m isobaths as revealed by Beninca (2013). The high proportion that slope resources as codling, Argentine hake, and monkfish accounted for in the demersal fish fleet landings (Table 10) supports this view. Exploitation of these species started in Brazil in the 2000's and were firstly developed by chartered foreign stern trawl and gillnet vessels which conducted exploratory fishing operations in the slope, and were soon replaced by domestic fleets (Perez et al., 2009a, 2009b). Going deeper, out from the well-known shelf fishing grounds, this fleet confirms the opportunistic expansion of the regional industrial trawling fleets to new grounds, aiming at compensating the economic losses derived from the overexploitation of the traditional demersal resources (Perez & Pezzuto, 2006; Perez et al., 2009b). Apart from increasing the range of species and areas to be exploited by the fleet, such behavior imply also in an uncontrolled fishing effort over the less abundant slope resources, whose limited biological productivity revealed to be incompatible with high mortality levels (Perez et al., 2005; Perez, 2006; Haimovici et al., 2006).
Interestingly, it is worth mentioning that, despite having the same licenses, the two pink-shrimp fleets behaved quite differently in almost all aspects, including, for instance, physical characteristics, mean number of days at sea and at fishing, main fishing areas, number of species landed and relative contribution in total landings and revenue. Such fact demonstrates that more than signifying only distinct strategies of catch conservation, using crushed ice of cold chambers in the pink-shrimp fishery can imply significant changes in the vessel dynamics too. While icing vessels' landings were more diverse and abundant, freezer vessels showed a lower number of species and a revenue proportionally higher, which can be explained by the predominance of pink-shrimps in their landing composition. Not depending on the limited ice durability on a tropical sea, pink-shrimp freezer vessels are able to spend nearly twice more days at fishing then pink-shrimp icing ones, retaining their catch more selectively and favoring those items with higher economic value. Consequently, it is probable that those cold-chambered vessels produce much more discards during their fishing trips than the icing ones, aiming at keeping storage space for such preferential items. Studies specially designed to investigate discards in the two fleets are necessary to verify this hypothesis.
Our results point out the high diversity of items landed by all the fleets examined in the present study as the number of species/categories recorded varied from 50 (sea-bob shrimp) to 68 (pink-shrimp icing and demersal fishes fleets). As many commercial categories figured out in the landing statistics include more than a single biological species (i.e., "mixture"; "sharks"), the real number of species effectively exploited by these fleets is certainly much higher. Studying the industrial double-rig landings in Sao Paulo State, Gra?a-Lopes et al. (2002b) recorded 70 biological species retained by sea-bob shrimp vessels between 1990 and 1991, and 137 by the pink-shrimp vessels which operated between 1989 and 1992. Kotas (1998) reported 103 biological species landed in Santa Catarina by industrial doublerig vessels directed to pink, Argentine red, Argentine stiletto and striped soldier shrimps during fishing trips conducted from 1993 to 1994. According to Haimovici & Mendon?a (1996a), double-rig trawlers operating off Rio Grande do Sul between 1992 and 1993 retained 32 biological species or genera of fishes (no data were available for invertebrates), when directing their effort to the southern shrimps and flatfishes. In spite of been possibly influenced by different methods of study, sampling effort and commercial issues, declining number of retained species from Sao Paulo to Rio Grande do Sul could reflect, in part, a natural expected pattern of latitudinal reduction in species diversity towards the south.
Regardless the spatial, legal and operational differences observed, the regional industrial double-rig fleets clearly develop well-established multi-specific fisheries, using non-selective apparatus in a naturally biodiverse ecosystem. Thus, focusing the licensing system in extensive lists of species catchable over large areas, does not seem reasonable or even practical given the following reasons: a) currently, excepting the mandatory use of turtle excluder devices by the Brazilian shrimp fleets (Brasil, 2004), there is no locally available technology to avoid catching species not listed in the respective permissions, imposing serious limitations to the management of those species, and putting industry and fishers over constant legal risk; b) the adoption of a permissible fishing area, encompassing the entire southeast-south region, aggravates the situation, making it virtually impossible to eliminate spatial overlapping among fleets, and consequently, coincidence in their catch composition; c) expanding the already extended lists of species in the licenses by including more items would turn the system even more complex and questionable in both biological and operational basis; and d) even if such a procedure were adopted, enforcement would be unfeasible, since inspectors would require high taxonomic skills on an extremely diverse range of species.
As pointed out by Norse (2010), unlimited mobility as evidenced in the present study encourages sequential overfishing and reduces profitability, as declining fishing abundance near homeports compels fishermen go farther, invest in larger boats, deal with higher fuel, labor, and processing costs. Therefore, how the license system for demersal fisheries should be designed in Brazil? The solution is certainly not trivial considering the complexities involved in biological, economical, structural, legal, and operational terms. Possibly, besides reducing total effort and enhancing fishing control, the most reasonable option was pointed out by Perez et al. (2001) for the management of demersal and benthic resources exploited on shelf and slope grounds of the region. Instead of permitting the free operation of the fleets throughout this large area, the southeastern-south Brazil should be divided in smaller "geographical management units" (GMUs), i.e. spatially restrict and ecosytemically designed fishing grounds, to be defined mostly according to the spatio-temporal distribution of different stocks, bottom characteristics, depth, fleet dynamics and technical considerations. After knowing the potential for sustainable exploitation of the main (or the more vulnerable) resources inhabiting each GMU, safe levels of effort would be allocated to them, redistributing and limiting the respective number of boats authorized to operate within each unit. Vessels should be licensed fundamentally to operate: a) on a single or few management unit(s) and b) with a specific fishing method. Different from the current system where catch/landing composition is the main criteria on the licensing design, the species composition would be a natural consequence of the interaction between fishing technique and ecological characteristics of the fishing grounds. Enforcement would be feasible mostly through the national vessel monitoring program (PREPS) in order to guarantee that vessels remain operating within the GMU (s) for which they were authorized. Essentially, the system should move from a species-based to a spatial-based approach, which has been considered of high value whenever multiple uses of space and resources result in conflicts among users or among these and the environment (Pipitone, 2012). Such change in licensing approach corroborates Caddy & Seijo (2005) belief that spatial tools should gain a greater role in fishing management, even of polyvalent offshore fisheries, especially considering the low-cost represented by satellite monitoring systems in terms of monitoring, control and surveillance.
Designing of GMUs could benefit from a significant amount of studies regarding resource distribution, fishing dynamics and management of pot, long-line, trawl and gillnet fisheries for benthic/demersal species living either on the shelf as on the regional slope grounds (e.g., Valentini et al., 1991; Haimovici & Mendon?a, 1996a, 1996b; Kotas, 1998; Perez & Pezzuto, 1998; Avila-da-Silva et al., 2001; Paiva et al., 2001, 2002; Perez et al., 2001, 2002a, 2002b, 2007, 2009a, 2009b; Gra?a-Lopes et al., 2002a, 2002b; Perez & Pezzuto, 2006; Pezzuto et al., 2006; Baptista-Metri, 2007; Avila-da-Silva & Arantes, 2007; Castro et al., 2007; Haimovici & Velasco, 2007; Silva, 2007; Tomas, 2007; Tomas & Cordeiro, 2007; Tomas et al., 2007; Dumont & D'Incao, 2008; Alves et al., 2009; Botelho et al., 2009; Dallagnolo et al., 2009; Pio, 2011; Valentini et al., 2012; Beninca, 2013; Correa, 2013; Rolim, 2014). Otherwise, if adoption of such model is to be considered, determining current biomass of the several stocks, reference points, sustainable effort allocation levels, and technical measures to be implemented within the GMUs (including those designed to reduce discards) would be some of the main scientific and management challenges to be faced in the future, as most of this information is virtually inexistent, and/or strictly dependent on the proper GMU's characteristics to be determined.
Although the ideas of Perez et al. (2001) have been proposed for over a decade, even before the implementation of the current multi-species licensing system, results of the present study reinforce the need to consider and develop such idea as a concrete alternative, if biological sustainability, fisheries economic viability, management effectiveness and legal security of those involved in Brazilian multi-species and multi-fleet demersal fisheries are goals to be achieved.
We are indebted to SINDIPI (Sindicato dos Armadores e das Industrias da Pesca de Itajai e Regiao) e SINDIFLORIPA (Sindicato da Industria de Pesca de Florianopolis) by the copies of the respective vessel's licenses, and also to the Fishing Studies Group team (GEP/UNIVALI) by collecting, processing and providing us with the corresponding landing statistics. Ana Paula Rosso (UNIVALI) kindly produced the maps from Figure 1. The Spanish version of the Abstract was written by Dr. Dante Queirolo Palma (Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso) to whom we are thankful. M.Sc. Ana Luisa de Souza Soares gave us assistance as to the methodology for correcting ex-vessel prices. We sincerely thank the two anonymous reviewers by the constructive suggestions that improved the quality of the manuscript. CAPES (Coordenado de Aperfeigoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior--Ministry of Education-Brazil) funded this study (Edital Capes Ciencias do Mar 09/2009, AUXPE 1141/2010-IGEPESCA Project). E.M.B. was supported by a M.Sc. scholarship granted by CAPES/PROSUP to Programa de Pos-Graduagao em Ciencia e Tecnologia Ambiental da UNIVALI. P.R.P. coordinates IGE-PESCA/CAPES Project and is supported by Research Grant from CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation-Brazil, Process 306904/2012-8).
Alves, P.M.F., C.A. Arfelli & A.R.G. Tomas. 2009. Caracterizagao da pesca de emalhe do litoral do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Bol. Inst. Pesca, 35(1): 17-27.
Avila-da-Silva, A.O. & L.H. Arantes. 2007. Analise da pesca de peixes demersais com linha-de-fundo pelas frotas do Rio de Janeiro e Sao Paulo de 1996 a 1999. In: C.L.D.B. Rossi-Wongtschowski, R.A. Bernardes & M.C. Cergole (eds.). Dinamica das frotas pesqueiras comerciais da regiao Sudeste-Sul do Brasil. Instituto Oceanografico da USP, Sao Paulo, pp. 277-294.
Avila-da-Silva, A.O., G.C.C. Bastos & S.L.S. Tutui. 2001. A atividade pesqueira do Estado de Sao Paulo: analise das capturas do bienio 1998-1999 com espinhel-defundo. Bol. Inst. Pesca, 27(1): 33-38.
Baptista-Metri, C. 2007. Biologia pesqueira de Artemesia longinaris Bate, 1888 (Decapoda, Dendrobranchiata, Penaeidae) e de Pleoticus muelleri (Bate, 1888) (Decapoda, Dendrobranchiata, Solenoceridae) no Sul do Brasil. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidade Federal do Parana, Parana, 218 pp.
Beninca, E.M. 2013. As pescarias industriais de arrastoduplo em Santa Catarina-Brasil: dinamica versus permissionamento. M.Sc. Dissertation, Universidade do Vale do Itajai, Santa Catarina, 109 pp.
Botelho, M.L.L.A., A.O. Avila-da-Silva & G.C.C. Bastos. 2009. A evolugao da pesca paulista de Lophius gastrophysus (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1915) na margem continental da costa brasileira entre 22[degrees] e 28[degrees]S. Bol. Inst. Pesca, 35(3): 413-427.
Brasil. 1938. Decreto-lei No 794, de 19 de outubro de 1938. [http://legis.senado.gov.br/legislacao/ListaNormas.act ion?numero=794&tipo_norma=DEL&data= 1938101 9&link=s]. Reviewed: 1 April 2014.
Brasil. 1967. Decreto-lei No 221, de 28 de fevereiro de 1967. [http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decretolei/del0221.htm]. Reviewed: 1 April 2014.
Brasil, 2004. Instrugao Normativa Ministerio do Meio Ambiente No 31, de 13 de dezembro de 2004. [http:// pesquisa.in. gov.br/imprensa/jsp/visualiza/index.jsp?jornal=1&pagina=61&data=14/12/2004]. Reviewed: 8 December 2014.
Brasil. 2009. Lei No 11.959, de 29 de junho de 2009. [http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato20072010/2009/Lei/L 11959. htm#art3 7]. Reviewed: 1 April 2014.
Brasil. 2011. Instrugao Normativa Interministerial No 10 (MPA/MMA), de 10 de junho de 2011. [http://www.mpa.gov.br/legislacaompa/instrucoes-normativas/meio -ambiente-ibama/2011]. Reviewed: 28 May 2014.
Caddy, J.F. & J.C. Seijo. 2005. This is more difficult than we thought! The responsibility of scientists, managers and stakeholders, to mitigate the unsustainability of marine fisheries. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B., 360: 59-75.
Castro, PM.G., M.H. Carneiro, G.J.M. Servo, C.M.D. Mucinhato & M.R. Souza. 2007. Dinamica da frota de arrasto de parelhas do Estado de Sao Paulo. In: C.L.D.B. Rossi-Wongtschowski, R.A. Bernardes & M.C. Cergole (eds.). Dinamica das frotas pesqueiras comerciais da regiao Sudeste-Sul do Brasil. Instituto Oceanografico da USP, Sao Paulo, pp. 60-103.
Charles, A.T. 2005. Derechos de uso y pesca responsable: limitando el acceso y la captura a traves de la ordenacion basada en derechos. Capitulo 6. In: K.L. Cochrane (ed.). Guia del administrador pesquero. Medidas de ordenacion y su aplicacion. FAO, Rome, pp. 127-155.
Correa, K.M. 2013. Avaliagao das pescarias com redes de emalhar descarregadas no Estado de Sao Paulo entre 2008 e 2011. M.Sc. Dissertation, Instituto de Pesca-APTA-SAA, Sao Paulo, 78 pp.
Dallagnolo, R., J.A.A. Perez & P.R. Pezzuto. 2009. O ordenamento da pescaria de camaroes-de-profundidade (Decapoda: Aristeidae) no sudeste e sul do Brasil. Braz. J. Aquat. Sci. Tech., 13: 31-43.
Diegues, A.C.S. 1983. Pescadores, camponeses e trabalhadores do mar. Atica, Sao Paulo, 287 pp.
D'Incao, F., H. Valentini & L.F. Rodrigues. 2002. Avaliagao da pesca de camaroes nas regioes sudeste e sul do Brasil. 1965-1999. Atlantica, 24(2): 103-116.
Doulman, D.J. 1987. Licensing distant-water tuna fleets in Papua New Guinea. Mar. Policy, 11(1): 16-28.
Dumont, L.F.C. & F. D'Incao. 2008. Distribution and abundance of the Argentinean (Artemesia longinaris) and red (Pleoticus muelleri) prawns (Decapoda: Penaeoidea) in southern Brazil during the commercial double-rig trawl fishery season. Nauplius, 16(2): 8394.
Dumont, L.F.C., I.F. Machado & F.D'Incao. 2011. Reproductive pattern, size at first maturity and stock-recruitment relationships of the argentine stiletto shrimp (Artemesia longinaris, Decapoda: Penaeidae) in southern Brazil. Atlantica, 33(2): 183-199.
Fahy, E. 2008. Performance of an inshore fishery in the absence of regulatory enforcement. Mar. Policy, 32: 1037-1042.
Fundagao Getulio Vargas. 2012. Indice de Pregos por Atacado do Mercado-IPA-M. [http://www.portalbrasil. net/ipa_m.htm]. Reviewed: 6 July 2012.
Graga-Lopes, R., A.R.G. Tomas, S.L.S. Tutui, E. Severino-Rodrigues & A. Puzzi. 2002a. Comparagao da dinamica de desembarques de frotas camaroeiras do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Bol. Inst. Pesca, 28(2): 163-171.
Graga-Lopes, R., A.R.G. Tomas, S.L.S. Tutui, E. Severino-Rodrigues & A. Puzzi. 2002b. Fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroeira no litoral do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Bol. Inst. Pesca, 28(2): 173-188.
Haimovici, M. 1998. Present state and perspectives for the southern Brazil shelf demersal fisheries. Fish. Manage. Ecol., 5: 277-289.
Haimovici, M. & J.T. Mendonga. 1996a. Descartes da fauna acompanhante na pesca de arrasto e tangones dirigida a linguados e camaroes na plataforma continental do sul do Brasil. Atlantica, 18: 161-177.
Haimovici, M. & J.T. Mendonga. 1996b. Analise da pesca de arrasto de tangones de peixes e camaroes no sul do Brasil: periodo 1989-1994. Atlantica, 18: 143-160.
Haimovici, M. & G. Velasco. 2007. A pesca de espinhelde-fundo no sul do Brasil em 1997 e 1998. In: C.L.D.B. Rossi-Wongtschowski, R.A. Bernardes & M.C. Cergole (eds.). Dinamica das frotas pesqueiras comerciais da regiao Sudeste-Sul do Brasil. Instituto Oceanografico da USP, Sao Paulo, pp. 295-307.
Haimovici, M., A.O. Avila-da-Silva & L.G. Fisher. 2006. Diagnostico do estoque e orientagoes para o ordenamento da pesca de Urophycis mystacea (Ribeiro, 1903). In: C.L.D.B. Rossi-Wongtschowski, A.O. Avila-da-Silva & M.C. Cergole (eds.). Analise das principais pescarias comerciais da regiao SudesteSul do Brasil: dinamica populacional das especies em explotagao-II. Instituto Oceanografico da USP, Sao Paulo, pp. 86-94.
Harte, M. & J. Barton. 2007. Reforming management of commercial fisheries in a small island territory. Mar. Policy, 31: 371-378.
Havice, E. 2010. The structure of tuna access agreements in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean: lessons for vessel day scheme planning. Mar. Policy, 34: 979-987.
Kotas, J.E. 1998. Fauna acompanhante nas pescarias de camarao em Santa Catarina. Ibama, Brasilia, 76 pp. Miloslavich, P., E. Klein, J.M. Diaz, C.E. Hernandez, G. Bigatti, L. Campos, F. Artigas, J. Castillo, P.E. Penchaszadeh, P.E. Neill, A. Carranza, M.V. Retana, J.M.D. Astarloa, M. Lewis, P. Yorio, M.L. Piriz, D. Rodriguez, Y. Yoneshigue-Valentin, L. Gamboa & A. Martin. 2011. Marine biodiversity in the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of South America: knowledge and gaps. PLoS One, 6(1): e14631.
Ministerio do Meio Ambiente. 2004. Instrugao Normativa No 5 de 21 de maio de 2004. Diario Oficial da Uniao, Segao 1, de 29 de maio de 2004, pp. 136-142. [http://pesquisa. in. gov.br/imprensa/j sp/visualiza/inde x.jsp?-data=28/05/2004&jornal=1&pagina=136&total Arquivos=184]. Reviewed: 9 April 2014.
Norse, E.A. 2010. Ecosystem-based spatial planning and management of marine fisheries: why and how? Bull. Mar. Sci., 86(2): 179-195.
Paiva, M.P., M.F. Andrade-Tubino & A.A.S. Menezes. 2002. Pesqueiros do camarao-rosa, Farfantepenaeus spp., no Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Brasil). Arq. Cien. Mar, 35: 79-85.
Paiva, M.P., A.A.S. Menezes & M.F. Andrade-Tubino. 2001. Pescarias industriais do camarao-rosa e da fauna acompanhante no Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil (1993-1997). Arq. Cien. Mar, 34: 61-66.
Pearse, P.H. 1981. Fishing rights, regulations and revenues. Mar. Policy, 5(2): 135-146.
Perez, J.A.A. 2006. Potenciais de rendimento dos alvos da pesca de arrasto de talude do Sudeste e Sul do Brasil, estimados a partir de parametros do ciclo de vida. Braz. J. Aquat. Sci. Tech., 10(2): 1-11.
Perez, J.A.A. & P.R. Pezzuto. 1998. Valuable shellfish species on the by-catch of shrimp fishery in southern Brazil: spatial and temporal patterns. J. Shellfish Res., 17(1): 303-309.
Perez, J.A.A. & P.R. Pezzuto. 2006. A pesca de arrasto de talude do sudeste e sul do Brasil: tendencias da frota nacional entre 2001 e 2003. Bol. Inst. Pesca, 32(2): 127-150.
Perez, J.A.A., P.R. Pezzuto & H.A. Andrade. 2005. Biomass assessment of the monkfish Lophius gastrophysus stock exploited by a new deep-water fishery in southern Brazil. Fish. Res., 72: 149-162.
Perez, J.A.A., R. Wahrlich & P.R. Pezzuto. 2009a. Chartered trawling on the slope off Brazilian coast. Mar. Fish. Rev., 71(2): 24-36.
Perez, J.A.A., P.R. Pezzuto, S.H. Lucato & W.G. Vale. 2007. Frota de arrasto de Santa Catarina. In: C.L.D.B.,
Rossi-Wongtschowski, R.A. Bernardes & M.C. Cergole (eds.). Dinamica das frotas pesqueiras comerciais da regiao Sudeste-Sul do Brasil. Instituto Oceanografico da USP, Sao Paulo, pp. 104-163.
Perez, J.A.A., P.R. Pezzuto, A.L.S. Soares & R. Wahrlich. 2009b. Deepwater fisheries in Brazil: history, status and perspectives. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 37: 513-541.
Perez, J.A.A., R. Wahrlich, P.R. Pezzuto & F.R.A. Lopes. 2002a. Estrutura e dinamica da pescaria do peixe-sapo Lophius grastrophysus no Sudeste e Sul do Brasil. Bol. Inst. Pesca, 28: 205-231.
Perez, J.A.A., P.R. Pezzuto, H.A. Andrade, P.R. Schwingel, M.R. Ribeiro & R. Wahrlich. 2002b. O ordenamento de uma nova pescaria direcionada ao peixe-sapo (Lophius gastrophysus) no Sudeste e Sul do Brasil. Notas Tec. da Facimar, 6: 65-83.
Perez, J.A.A., P.R. Pezzuto, L.F. Rodrigues, H. Valentini & C.M. Vooren. 2001. Relatorio da reuniao tecnica de ordenamento da pesca de arrasto nas regioes sudeste e sul do Brasil. Notas. Tec. Facimar, 5: 1-34.
Pezzuto, P.R., J.A.A. Perez & R. Wahrlich. 2006. O ordenamento das pescarias de caranguejos-de-profundidade (Chaceon spp.) (Decapoda: Geryonidae) no sul do Brasil. Bol. Inst. de Pesca, 32: 229-247.
Pio, VM. 2011. A pesca industrial de emalhe de fundo em Santa Catarina-Brasil: dinamica, tecnologia, economia e gestao. M. Sc. Dissertation, Universidade do Vale do Itajai, Santa Catarina, 117 pp.
Pipitone, C. 2012. Spatial approach to fisheries management in the Mediterranean region. Transversal workshop on spatial based approach to fishery management. Rome, pp. 6-8.
Pope, J. 2005. Controles a insumos y productos: la practica de la ordenacion de esfuerzo de pesca y captura en la pesca responsable. Capitulo 4. In: K.L. Cochrane (ed.). Guia del administrador pesquero. Medidas de ordenacion y su aplicacion. FAO, Rome, pp. 69-89.
Rolim, F.A. 2014. Avaliagao dos padroes espagotemporais recentes da pesca com parelhas e sua gestao no Estado de Sao Paulo. M.Sc. Dissertation, Instituto de Pesca-APTA-SAA, Sao Paulo, 96 pp.
Shen, G. & M. Heino. 2014. An overview of marine fisheries management in China. Mar. Policy, 44: 265-272.
Silva, S.O. 2007. Analise da estrutura da comunidade de peixes demersais da plataforma continental e talude superior do Sudeste brasileiro vulneraveis a pesca de arrasto-de-fundo. M.Sc. Dissertation, Instituto de Pesca-APTA-SAA, Sao Paulo, 86 pp.
Tomas, A.R.G. 2007. Dinamica da frota de emalhe do Estado de Sao Paulo. In: C.L.D.B. Rossi Wongtschowski, R.A. Bernardes & M.C. Cergole (eds.). Dinamica das frotas pesqueiras comerciais da regiao Sudeste-Sul do Brasil. Instituto Oceanografico da USP, Sao Paulo, pp. 263-275.
Tomas, A.R.G. & R.A. Cordeiro. 2007. Dinamica da frota de arrasto de portas do estado do Rio de Janeiro. In: C.L.D.B. Rossi-Wongtschowski, R.A. Bernardes & M.C. Cergole (eds.). Dinamica das frotas pesqueiras comerciais da regiao Sudeste-Sul do Brasil. Instituto Oceanografico da USP, Sao Paulo, pp. 17-40.
Tomas, A.R.G., M.A. Gasalla & M.H. Carneiro. 2007. Dinamica da frota de arrasto-de-portas do estado de Sao Paulo. In: C.L.D.B. Rossi-Wongtschowski, R.A. Bernardes & M.C. Cergole (eds.). Dinamica das frotas pesqueiras comerciais da regiao Sudeste-Sul do Brasil. Instituto Oceanografico da USP, Sao Paulo, pp. 41-59.
Universidade do Vale do Itajai (UNIVALI)/Centro de Ciencias Tecnologicas da Terra e do Mar (CTTMar). 2013. Boletim estatistico da pesca industrial de Santa Catarina-Ano 2012. Universidade do Vale do Itajai, Itajai, 76 pp.
Valentini, H. & P.R. Pezzuto. 2006. Analise das principais pescarias comerciais da regiao Sudeste-Sul do Brasil com base na produgao controlada do periodo 1986-2004. Serie Documentos REVIZEE-Score Sul. Instituto Oceanografico-USP, Sao Paulo, 56 pp.
Valentini, H., F. D'Incao, L.F. Rodrigues & L.F. Dumont. 2012. Evolugao da pescaria industrial de camarao-rosa (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis e F. paulensis) na costa Sudeste e Sul do Brasil-1968-1989. Atlantica, 34(2): 157-171.
Valentini, H., F. D'Incao, J.E. Rodrigues, J.E. Rebelo Neto & E. Rahn. 1991. Analise da pesca do camarao-rosa (P brasiliensis e P paulensis) nas regioes Sudeste e Sul do Brasil. Atlantica, 13(1): 143-157.
Received: 24 June 2014; Accepted: 16 January 2015
Paulo Ricardo-Pezzuto (1) & Erica Mastella-Beninca (2)
(1) Centro de Ciencias Tecnologicas da Terra e do Mar, Universidade do Vale do Itajai (UNIVALI) Rua Uruguai 458, Centro, CEP 88.302-901, Itajai, SC, Brazil
(2) Departamento de Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensao, Instituto Federal de Educaqao Ciencia e Tecnologia de Santa Catarina (IFSC)
Rua Nereu Ramos 3450D, Seminario, CEP 89.813-000, Chapeco, SC, Brazil
Corresponding author: Erica Mastella-Beninca (email@example.com)
Corresponding editor: Patricio Arana
Caption: Figure 1. Spatial distribution of fishing effort (number of trips) of the four industrial double-rig fleets of Santa Catarina State, southern Brazil, monitored between 2008 and 2010 and licensed for: a: pink-shrimp, equipped with cold chambers (freezer), b: pink-shrimp using crushed ice, c: sea-bob shrimp and d: demersal fishes. Main fishing harbors are indicated. ES, MG, RJ, SP, PR, SC and RS refer, respectively, to the Brazilian states of Espirito Santo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo, Parana, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul.
Caption: Figure 2. Contribution in weight (ton) and revenue (US$) of target and expected by-catch species as defined in the industrial double-rig pink-shrimp licenses, according to landings monitored in Santa Catarina State, between 2008 and 2010. "Other" refers to species not listed in the licenses. Only vessels using cold chambers (freezers) to conserve the catch aboard were considered.
Caption: Figure 3. Contribution in weight (ton) and revenue (US$) of target and expected by-catch species as defined in the industrial double-rig pink-shrimp licenses, according to landings monitored in Santa Catarina State, between 2008 and 2010. "Other" refers to species not listed in the licenses. Only vessels using crushed ice to conserve the catch aboard were considered.
Caption: Figure 4. Contribution in weight (ton) and revenue (US$) of target and expected by-catch species as defined in the industrial double-rig sea-bob shrimp licenses, according to landings monitored in Santa Catarina State, between 2008 and 2010. "Other" refers to species not listed in the licenses.
Caption: Figure 5. Contribution in weight (ton) and revenue (US$) of target and expected by-catch species as defined in the industrial double-rig demersal fishes licenses, according to landings monitored in Santa Catarina State, between 2008 and 2010. "Other" refers to species not listed in the licenses.
Table 1. Authorizations, according to the current license system, for industrial double-rig vessels operating in the shelf areas of the southeastern-south (SE-S) region. "Complementary authorization" refers to a temporary license granted to the fleet during the annual pink -shrimp fishery closure (March to May) for operations in areas outside the main target distribution. Authorization Target species Expected by-catch Pink-shrimp Pink-shrimp, Argentine conger, Argentine Argentine croaker, red shrimp Argentine goatfish, and Argentine hake, Argentine Atlantic bigeye, stiletto blue runner, shrimp Brazilian codling, Brazilian flathead, comb grouper, common octopus, crab, dogfish, flatfish, grey triggerfish, Jamaica weakfish, king weakfish, lane snappers, largehead hairtail, monkfish, namorado sandperch, pink cusk-eel, rays, red grouper, red porgy, rough scad, sea trout, slipper lobster, snappers, snowy grouper, southern searobin, squid, striped weakfish, tile fish, Uruguayan lobster, whitemouth croaker Sea-bob shrimp Sea-bob shrimp, Argentine croaker, Argentine red Argentine goatfish, shrimp and banded croaker, Argentine bluewing searobin, stiletto Brazilian codling, shrimp crabs, dogfish, flatfish, grey triggerfish, Jamaica weakfish, king weakfish, monkfish, rays, sea trout, southern kingcroaker, southern white shrimp, squid, striped weakfish, whitemouth croaker Demersal fish Whitemouth Argentine conger, croaker, Argentine goatfish, Argentine Atlantic bigeye, croaker, sea banded croaker, trout and king blue runner, weakfish, Brazilian flathead, flatfish, comb grouper, Brazilian croakers, drums, codling, Jamaica weakfish, bluewing lane snappers, searobin largehead hairtail, monkfish, namorado sandperch, pink cusk-eel, rays, red grouper, red porgy, slipper lobster, snappers, snowy grouper, southern kingcroaker, squid, striped weakfish, tile fish, Uruguayan lobster Authorization Area of operation Pink-shrimp Territorial sea SE-S; and EEZ SE-S (complementary authorization: outside the pink-shrimp area --above 100 m) Sea-bob shrimp Territorial sea SE-S; and EEZ SE-S Demersal fish Territorial sea SE-S and EEZ SE-S (depths less than 250 m) Table 2. Vernacular and scientific names of the species landed and/or listed in the licenses of the industrial double-rig fleets of Santa Catarina State, southern Brazil. Vernacular name Scientific name Family Angel sharks Squatina spp. Squatinidae Argentine conger Conger orbignianus, Congridae Myrophis punctatus, Ophichthidae Raneya brasiliensis Ophidiidae Argentine croaker Umbrina canosai Sciaenidae Argentine goatfish Mullus argentinae Mullidae Argentine hake Merluccius hubbsi Phycidae Argentine red shrimp Pleoticus muelleri Penaeidae Argentine stiletto Artemesia longinaris Penaeidae shrimp Atlantic bigeye Priacanthus arenatus Priacantidae Banded croaker Paralonchurus brasiliensis Sciaenidae Blue runner Caranx crysos Carangidae Bluewing searobin Prionotus punctatus Triglidae Brazilian codling Urophycis brasiliensis Phycidae Brazilian flathead Percophis brasiliensis Percophidae Codling Urophycis mystacea Phycidae Comb grouper Mycteroperca bonaci, M. Serranidae microlepis, M. acutirostris Common octopus Octopus vulgaris Octopodidae Crab Callinectes sapidus, C. Portunidae bocourti, C. danae, C. ornatus Croakers Stellifer brasiliensis; Sciaenidae S. rastrifer, S. naso Dogfishs Prionace glauca, Carcharhinidae Carcharhinus Lamnidae falciformis, Isurus Squalidae oxyrinchus, Squalus acanthias, Triakidae S. cubensis, S. blainville, Mustelus fasciatus Drums Cynoscion acoupa, C. Sciaenidae leiarchus, C. guatucupa, Larimus breviceps, Pogonias cromis Flatfish Paralichthys brasiliensis, Paralichthydae P. patagonicus Grey triggerfish Balistes capriscus Balistidae Jamaica weakfish Cynoscion jamaicensis Sciaenidae King weakfish Macrodon ancylodon Sciaenidae Largehead hairtail Trichiurus lepturus Trichiuridae Monkfish Lophius gastrophysus Lophiidae Namorado sandperch Pseudopercis numida Mugiloididae Pink cusk-eel Genypterus brasiliensis Ophidiidae Pink-shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis, Penaeidae F brasiliensis Rays Atlantoraja cyclophora, Rajidae A. castelnaui; Rioraja agassizii, Breviraja spinosa, Rajella purpuriventralis Red grouper Epinephelus morio Serranidae Red porgy Pagrus pagrus Sparidae Rough scad Trachurus lathami Carangidae Sand flounder Paralichthys isosceles, Paralichthydae P triocellatus Sea trout Cynoscion spp. Sciaenidae Sea-bob shrimp Xiphopenaeus kroyeri Penaeidae Skate raja Atlantoraja platana, Rajidae Sympterygia bonapartii, S. acuta Slipper lobster Scyllarides deceptor, Scyllaridae S. brasiliensis, S. delfosi Snappers Lutjanus cyanopterus, Lutjanidae L. jocu, L. synagris, Ocyurus chrysurus, Rhomboplites aurorubens Snowy grouper Epinephelus niveatus, Serranidae E. morio Southern kingcroaker Menticirrhus spp. Sciaenidae Southern white Litopenaeus schimitti Penaeidae shrimp Spiny dogfish Squalus spp. Squalidae Squid Loligo plei, L. Loliginida sanpaulensis Striped soldier Plesionika edwardsii Pandalidae shrimp Striped weakfish Cynoscion striatus Sciaenidae Tile fish Lopholatilus villarii Branchiostegidae Uruguayan lobster Metanephrops rubellus Nephropidae Whitemouth croaker Micropogonias furnieri Sciaenidae Table 3. Temporal variation in number of vessels, number of trips, total landed catch (ton), and mean catch rate (ton/trip) of the industrial double-rig fleets of Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil, as recorded by the Santa Catarina Industrial Fishing Statistics Program. Pink-shrimp vessels were separated according to the catch storage method. Fleet Period 2008 Vessels Trips Landings ton/trip (ton) Pink-shrimp (total) 85 444 5,040.4 11.4 Pink-shrimp freezer 27 107 883.3 8.3 Pink-shrimp icing 58 337 4,157.2 12.3 Sea-bob shrimp 39 232 3,003.4 12.9 Demersal fishes 39 287 9,063.9 31.6 Total 163 963 17,107.8 17.8 Fleet Period 2009 Vessels Trips Landings ton/trip (ton) Pink-shrimp (total) 89 417 5,011.5 12.0 Pink-shrimp freezer 25 85 740.8 8.7 Pink-shrimp icing 64 332 4,270.7 12.9 Sea-bob shrimp 43 176 2,126.1 12.1 Demersal fishes 37 242 7,835.3 32.4 Total 169 835 14,973.0 17.9 Fleet Period 2010 Vessels Trips Landings ton/trip (ion) Pink-shrimp (total) 81 355 3,631.6 10.2 Pink-shrimp freezer 23 63 529.7 8.4 Pink-shrimp icing 58 292 3,101.9 10.6 Sea-bob shrimp 43 214 2,419.5 11.3 Demersal fishes 37 250 8,579.4 34.3 Total 161 819 14.631 17.9 Fleet Total Vessels Trips Landings ton/trip (ton) Pink-shrimp (total) 100 1,216 13,683.5 11.3 Pink-shrimp freezer 32 255 2,153.8 8.4 Pink-shrimp icing 68 961 11,529.8 12.0 Sea-bob shrimp 47 622 7,549.0 12.1 Demersal fishes 44 779 25,478.7 32.7 Total 191 2,617 46,711.3 17.8 Table 4. Total length (m) and main engine power (HP) of the industrial double-rig fleets of Santa Catarina State, southern Brazil. Values are medians (minimum-maximum). Pink-shrimp vessels were separated according to the catch storage method. Fleet Total length Main engine (m) power (HP) Pink-shrimp freezer 21.9 325 (17.9-22.5) (170-425) Pink-shrimp icing 18.4 227.5 (13.2-24.2) (110-425) Sea-bob shrimp 14.6 130 (10.5-18.3) (90-325) Demersal fishes 22.1 325 (17.6-24.8) (175-425) Table 5. Operational characteristics the industrial double-rig fleets of Santa Catarina State, southern Brazil. Values are medians (minimum-maximum), except for number of trips. Pink-shrimp vessels were separated according to the catch storage method. Fleet Number of trips Days at sea Days at fishing Pink-shrimp freezer 216 34.5 26 (3-60) (3-50) Pink-shrimp icing 875 18.5 15 (6-36) (3-33) Sea-bob shrimp 464 17 14 (7-30) (3-27) Demersal fishes 714 24 18 Fleet Hauls/Day Haul duration (h) Pink-shrimp freezer 4 5.5 (2-7) (1.8-8) Pink-shrimp icing 5 4.5 (2-8) (2-7) Sea-bob shrimp 5 4.0 (3-10) (2-6) Demersal fishes 4 4.7 Table 6. Mean ex-vessel prices of the main fishery resources exploited by the industrial double-rig fleets of Santa Catarina State, southern Brazil. All prices are in Brazilian currency (US$/kg) and were standardized to the reference date of December 2010. SD: standard deviation, Not discriminated: items whose composition was unknown, Mixture: a specific item of the landings composed by low-valued species landed and sold on an aggregated basis. Year Species or 2008 2009 commercial categories Mean SD Mean SD Pink-shrimp 19.71 0.79 15.44 2.25 Southern white shrimp 7.70 1.41 9.26 0.49 Uruguayan lobster 4.50 1.30 6.71 1.76 Argentine red shrimp 3.17 0.38 3.08 0.66 Flatfishh 3.18 0.58 3.26 0.62 Striped soldier shrimp 2.84 0.17 2.59 0.35 Squid 0.99 0.62 2.21 1.28 Sea-bob shrimp 1.90 0.09 1.60 0.33 Monkfish 1.34 0.15 1.47 0.19 Not discriminated 1.39 0.06 1.29 0.06 Codling 1.19 0.06 1.33 0.16 Argentine stiletto shrimp 1.39 0.28 1.37 0.36 Brazilian codling 1.00 0.17 1.09 0.09 Sand flounder 0.88 0.10 1.10 0.14 Bluewing searobin 0.82 0.04 0.81 0.12 Argentine hake 0.78 0.13 0.84 0.08 Striped weakfish 0.78 0.12 0.81 0.07 Dogfishs 0.54 0.00 1.00 0.00 Skate raja 0.74 0.03 0.74 0.09 Grey triggerfish 0.74 0.13 0.69 0.08 Mixture 0.40 0.02 0.45 0.06 Year Species or 2010 Mean commercial categories Mean SD Pink-shrimp 14.98 0.85 16.71 Southern white shrimp -- 8.48 Uruguayan lobster 8.52 0.00 6.58 Argentine red shrimp 3.46 0.14 3.24 Flatfishh 2.84 0.25 3.09 Striped soldier shrimp -- 2.72 Squid 2.82 0.21 2.01 Sea-bob shrimp 1.99 0.15 1.83 Monkfish 1.55 0.34 1.45 Not discriminated 1.27 0.04 1.32 Codling -- 1.26 Argentine stiletto shrimp 0.94 0.09 1.23 Brazilian codling 0.86 0.09 0.98 Sand flounder 0.72 0.05 0.90 Bluewing searobin 0.82 0.08 0.82 Argentine hake 0.79 0.15 0.80 Striped weakfish 0.73 0.15 0.78 Dogfishs -- 0.77 Skate raja 0.75 0.12 0.74 Grey triggerfish 0.71 0.05 0.72 Mixture 0.46 0.08 0.44 Table 7. Weight (ton) and revenue (US$) of the main items landed between 2008 and 2010 in Santa Catarina State by the local industrial fleet licensed to catch pink-shrimps. Only vessels that use cold chambers (freezers) to conserve the catch aboard were considered. Prices were standardized to the reference date of December 2010. Mixture: a specific item of the landings composed by low-valued species landed and sold on an aggregated basis. Year Species or commercial 2008 2009 categories ton US$ ton US$ Pink-shrimp 174 3,432,559 192 2,898,560 Squid 43 44,641 44 154,116 Uruguayan lobster 25 135,619 19 145,334 Codling 69 84,101 52 75,767 Mixture 135 54,502 179 83,211 Brazilian codling 75 82,840 41 42,739 Striped soldier shrimp 33 90,368 9 25,237 Bluewing searobin 43 35,592 73 60,148 Argentine stiletto shrimp 71 82,562 -- -- Argentine red shrimp 28 84,074 0 824 Total 883 4,327,060 741 3,617,671 Year Total Species or commercial 2010 categories ton US$ ton % Pink-shrimp 100 1,530,971 465 22 Squid 124 365,105 211 10 Uruguayan lobster 14 121,700 58 3 Codling 37 44,718 157 7 Mixture 94 47,972 407 19 Brazilian codling 26 22,709 142 7 Striped soldier shrimp 6 15,168 48 2 Bluewing searobin 16 12,927 132 6 Argentine stiletto shrimp 26 22,165 97 4 Argentine red shrimp 3 8,640 31 1 Total 530 2,280,568 2,154 81 Total Species or commercial categories US$ % Pink-shrimp 7,862,089 77 Squid 563,862 6 Uruguayan lobster 402,654 4 Codling 204,587 2 Mixture 185,685 2 Brazilian codling 148,288 1 Striped soldier shrimp 130,773 1 Bluewing searobin 108,667 1 Argentine stiletto shrimp 104,726 1 Argentine red shrimp 93,539 1 Total 10,225,299 96 Table 8. Weight (ton) and revenue (US$) of the main items landed between 2008 and 2010 in Santa Catarina state by the local industrial fleet licensed to catch pink-shrimps. Only vessels that use crushed ice to conserve the catch aboard were considered. Prices were standardized to the reference date of December 2010. Mixture: a specific item of the landings composed by low-valued species landed and sold on an aggregated basis. Species or commercial Year 2008 2009 categories ton US$ ton US$ Pink-shrimp 130 2,559,972 229 3,311,348 Argentine stiletto 1,252 1,520,070 1,138 1,328,928 shrimp Argentine red shrimp 483 1,527,166 297 764,166 Flatfish 159 508,721 167 546,255 Uruguayan lobster 35 180,962 55 341,837 Codling 194 229,662 195 256,392 Bluewing searobin 367 302,219 296 238,004 Striped soldier shrimp 53 147,063 29 74,082 Mixture 309 124,691 576 258,555 Squid 27 18,589 14 46,478 Brazilian codling 191 195,203 202 219,699 Sand flounder 134 123,296 123 129,265 Skate raja 151 111,288 172 118,104 Total 4,157 8,326,331 4,271 8,382,214 Species or commercial Year Total 2010 categories ton US$ ton % Pink-shrimp 125 1,907,278 484 4 Argentine stiletto 888 836,791 3,278 28 shrimp Argentine red shrimp 48 166,03 828 7 Flatfish 81 229,234 407 4 Uruguayan lobster 37 312,784 127 1 Codling 189 221,095 578 5 Bluewing searobin 125 95,335 788 7 Striped soldier shrimp 156 380,081 238 2 Mixture 427 204,342 1,312 11 Squid 136 385,116 177 2 Brazilian codling 73 62,751 466 4 Sand flounder 81 58,737 339 3 Skate raja 87 61,56 410 4 Total 3,102 5,684,868 11,530 82 Species or commercial Total categories US$ % Pink-shrimp 7,778,598 35 Argentine stiletto 3,685,789 16 shrimp Argentine red shrimp 2,457,362 11 Flatfish 1,284,210 6 Uruguayan lobster 835,583 4 Codling 707,149 3 Bluewing searobin 635,559 3 Striped soldier shrimp 601,226 3 Mixture 587,588 3 Squid 450,183 2 Brazilian codling 477,653 2 Sand flounder 311,298 1 Skate raja 290,952 1 Total 22,393,414 90 Table 9. Weight (ton) and revenue (US$) of the main items landed between 2008 and 2010 in Santa Catarina State by the local industrial fleet licensed to catch sea-bob shrimp. Prices were standardized to the reference date of December 2010. Mixture: a specific item of the landings composed by low-valued species landed and sold on an aggregated basis. Species or commercial Year categories 2008 2009 ton US$ ton US$ Argentine stiletto shrimp 1,702 2,132,188 999 1,158,630 Sea-bob shrimp 501 964,036 596 868,721 Argentine red shrimp 525 1,643,487 229 634,611 Southern white shrimp 10 82,005 19 165,895 Mixture 80 45,318 113 191,369 Flatfish 11 31,102 6 51,164 Pink-shrimp 2 30,339 13 20,110 Total 3,003 5,131,339 2,126 3,233,821 Species or commercial Year Total categories 2010 ton US$ ton % Argentine stiletto shrimp 1,040 976,405 3,741 50 Sea-bob shrimp 1,124 2,240,375 2,221 29 Argentine red shrimp 60 206,578 814 11 Southern white shrimp 15 113,630 44 1 Mixture 66 50,962 259 3 Flatfish 8 30,448 24 0 Pink-shrimp 3 23,170 19 0 Total 2,419 3,817,836 7,549 94 Species or commercial Total categories US$ % Argentine stiletto shrimp 4,267,223 35 Sea-bob shrimp 4,073,132 34 Argentine red shrimp 2,484,676 20 Southern white shrimp 361,530 3 Mixture 287,649 1 Flatfish 112,714 1 Pink-shrimp 73,619 2 Total 12,182,997 96 Table 10. Weight (ton) and revenue (US$) of the main items landed between 2008 and 2010 in Santa Catarina State by the local industrial fleet licensed to catch demersal fishes. Prices were standardized to the reference date of December 2010. Not discriminated: items whose composition were unknown. Species or commercial Year categories 2008 2009 ton US$ ton US$ Codling 2,182 2,612,909 2,388 3,157,721 Flatfish 659 2,155,298 553 1,904,528 Argentine hake 894 716,485 1,210 1,053,460 Bluewing searobin 1,214 1,010,630 542 422,346 Monkfish 242 327,107 322 473,905 Brazilian codling 574 590,406 240 258,841 Not discriminated 386 612,561 131 203,615 Skate raja 378 308,059 327 231,558 Striped weakfish 296 213,553 216 174,155 Grey triggerfish 225 170,063 264 168,853 Total 9,064 10,723,166 7,835 9,981,431 Species or commercial Year Total categories 2010 ton US$ ton % Codling 2,194 2,508,868 6,764 27 Flatfish 493 1,391,747 1,704 7 Argentine hake 961 753,176 3,065 12 Bluewing searobin 773 609,799 2,529 10 Monkfish 557 882,953 1,121 4 Brazilian codling 299 259,252 1,113 4 Not discriminated 122 161,347 638 3 Skate raja 358 255,777 1,064 4 Striped weakfish 277 204,784 790 3 Grey triggerfish 322 230,278 811 3 Total 8,579 8,959,541 25,479 77 Species or commercial Total categories US$ % Codling 8,279,498 28 Flatfish 5,451,573 18 Argentine hake 2,523,120 8 Bluewing searobin 2,042,775 7 Monkfish 1,683,966 6 Brazilian codling 1,108,499 4 Not discriminated 977,523 3 Skate raja 795,394 3 Striped weakfish 592,492 2 Grey triggerfish 569,195 2 Total 29,664,139 81 Table 11. Percentage of species in common in licenses and landings of the industrial double-rig fleets of Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil, monitored between 2008 and 2010. Pink-shrimp vessels were separated according to the catch storage method. Because licenses are the same for all pink -shrimp vessels regardless of their storage method, percentages were repeated in the table when comparing species listed in their respective licenses with the other fleets. Fleet Criteria License Pink-shrimp Pink-shrimp Sea-bob Demersal freezer icing shrimp fishes Pink-shrimp freezer -- -- 40.9 71.1 Pink-shrimp icing -- -- 40.9 71.1 Sea-bob shrimp 40.9 40.9 -- 31.8 Demersal fishes 71.1 71.1 31.8 -- Fleet Criteria Landing Pink-shrimp Pink-shrimp Sea-bob Demersal freezer icing shrimp fishes Pink-shrimp freezer -- 70.8 71.0 73.2 Pink-shrimp icing 70.8 -- 71.0 82.4 Sea-bob shrimp 71.0 71.0 -- 66.2 Demersal fishes 73.2 82.4 66.2 --
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Research Article|
|Author:||Ricardo-Pezzuto, Paulo; Mastella-Beninca, Erica|
|Publication:||Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research|
|Date:||Jul 1, 2015|
|Previous Article:||Comparative histological description of the digestive and visual system development of larval chame (Dormitator latifrons (Pisces:...|
|Next Article:||Larval and juvenile culture of Vogde's scallop Euvola vogdesi (Pteroida: Pectinidae)/Cultivo de larvas y juveniles de almeja voladora Euvola vogdesi...|