Printer Friendly

Cervical cancer screening and HPV genotype distribution among asymptomatic patients of Karachi Pakistan.

Byline: Mubeena Shahid, Shahana Urooj Kazmi, Ameena Rehman, Jahanara Ainuddin, Sayed Furqan and Sobia Nazeer

: ABSTRACT

Background: Cervical cancer is the second most prevalent cancer in females worldwide. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a sexually transmitted infection. However, in addition to HPV infection, other factors exist that influence the risk of developing cervical cancer. In Pakistan most women who developed cervical cancer have been infrequently or never screened.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of HPV infection and its subtype profile among asymptomatic patients with pre cancerous cervical intraepithelial lesion.

Methods: In this hospital-based descriptive study, 160 asymptomatic females attending gynecology clinics were subjected to HPV screening after obtaining informed consent. Cervical Scrapings were examined by cytopathology and colposcopic directed biopsies taken. High-grade intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) CIN-2, and Low-grade intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) CIN-1 were selected. Samples were analyzed for the presence of HPV-DNA general and type specific genotype 16 and 18. HPV- DNA was extracted by QIA amp DNA kit protocol and amplification was done by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and genotyped by type specific primers.

Results: Out of 160, 17 Pap smear tests were positive, 6 (35.3%) with abnormal results (HSIL) CIN-2 were HPV-DNA positive. Among them, 5 (83.3%) had subtype 16 and in 1 (16.7%) case the genotype was undetectable. The remaining 11(6.9%) with pre cancer minimal abnormal (LSIL) CIN-1 presented. Out of them 3 (27.3%) were HPV-DNA positive with subtype 16. Five (45.4%) were followed by repeated pap smear every six months for two years, and the rest of 3 (27.3%) patients refused for the test.

Conclusion: A high incidence of Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is found in women with pre cancerous lesion of cervix in Pakistani women.

KEY WORDS: Asymptomatic, Cervix cancer, HPV genotypes, Socio-demographic factors.

INTRODUCTION

It is now well established that HPV infection is the central, probably necessary cause of cervical cancer.1 Statistical analyses released from the World Health Organization (WHO) suggest that cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide.2,3 It is estimated that each year approximately 493,000 new cases are diagnosed and 274,000 women die from cervical cancer worldwide.4

The incidence of cervical carcinoma is substantially higher among women of low socioeconomic status.

According to a WHO study, the incidence of cervical cancer in Pakistan in 2008 was 13.6 per 100,000 compared to less than 9 per 100,000 in 2002, which shows that the country is moving from low-risk to young girls are more at risk than before. Although Pap smear screening has decreased the incidence of cervical cancer in the United States, there are still pockets of the population, such as the American Indian women of the Northern Plains, that have a significantly higher rate of cervical cancer.5,6

Human papillomavirus is considered to be the most important risk factor in the development of cervical cancer and sexual transmission is the predominant route of HPV infection. Transitional zone of cervix is the most common site of cervical cancer and it is most susceptible to the carcinogenicity of HPV.7

The cofactors may be genetic, immunological as well as sociodemographic, e.g. lower age of conception, high parity, use of oral contraceptives, diet, smoking, etc. it was also evidenced that women co-infected with multiple HPV-type infections comprising of one or more high-risk types were prone to persistent HPV infection.8

General improvement in socioeconomic status and educational level of the population tends to have a positive effect on the risk of cervical cancer by altering some of the known risk factors such as age at marriage, parity and health-care seeking behavior. Other strategies such as low-intensity cytology screening (e.g., 1 Pap smear every 10 years after age 35) and visual inspection need to be better evaluated in randomized controlled trials to determine their cost-effectiveness.9

Vaccination against HPV may have greatest value in developing countries, where 80% of the global burden of cervical cancer occurs each year and where Pap screening programs have been largely ineffective. Two main types of vaccine are currently being developed: prophylactic vaccines to prevent HPV infection and consequently the various HPV- associated diseases, and therapeutic vaccines to induce regression of precancerous lesions or remission of advanced cervical cancer. The study was done to determine the prevalence of HPV infection and its subtype profile among asymptomatic Pakistani women with pre cancerous cervical intraepithelial lesion. Details of Socio- demographic variables were also studied.

METHODS

Study design: This is descriptive study. Taking the incidence of HPV infection in cervical cancer as 65.8% with 7% confidence limit, at 95% confidence level, sample size calculated was 177.

Patient selection: Women attending OPD of tertiary care hospital for routine physical gynaecological examination from April 2012 to December 2012 in Karachi participated in this study. An appropriate institutional review board approval was obtained prior to sample collection. Written informed consent was obtained from 160 voluntary patients to perform a conventional Pap smear test. Cervical sample was prepared on a glass slide immediately sprayed with fixative 95% alcohol for later testing. All Positive (HSIL/LSIL) patients were re- examined by expert Gynecologist using colposcope and cervical scraping exfoliated cervical cells in tubes of 5ml pre-chilled phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and colposcopic directed biopsy was taken from suspicious areas. The pap smears were examined by expert Cytologist/Histopathologist using the Bethesda classification.

Colposcopy and histology results were reported as per the Richart CIN system in which the terms atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), quamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL, HSIL) are used.11-13

DNA extraction of cervical cells and tissue biopsies: Biopsy tissue crushed and re-suspended in chilled phosphate buffered saline (PBS) then DNA was extracted by QIA amp DNA Mini Kit as per Manufacturers instructions (Qiagen QIA amp kit) Germany.

Polymerase chain reaction: The samples were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using four sets of primers, that is, GP5/GP6, general primers for HPV, TS16-A/TS16-B and TS18-A/ TS18-B, subtype-specific primers for HPV subtypes 16 and 18 respectively, and C03/PC04 for b-globin, sequences for the primers are given in Table-I along with the length of respective PCR amplimers and the targeted gene. The PCR conditions for these primers were as follows.

For primers GP5/GP6, the total 25L PCR reaction mixture contained 5 L sample, 12.5 L ready to use PCR mixture (Super Hot Master mix 2x, Bioron GmbH) and 0.4 pmol of each primer. The PCR thermal profile was: 95C for 5 minutes, 40 cycles of 94C for 30 s, 45C for 30s, 72C for 30 s and final extension of 5 minutes at 72C.

Table-I: Primers used for HPV typing.

###Primer###Sequence###Target gene###Amplimer length

###GP5###TTTGTTACTGTGGTAGATAC L1###155 base pair

###GP6TAAAAATAAACTGTAAATCA

###TS16-A GGTCGGTGGACCGGTCGATG L1###96 base pairs

###TS16-BGCAATGTAGGTGTATCTCCA

###TS18-A CCTTGGTAAATTTTTGG###L1###115 base pairs

###TS18-BCACGCACACGCTTGGCAGGT

###PCO3###ACACAACTGTGTTCACTAGC -globin###110 base pairs

###PCO4CAACTTCATCCACGTTCACC

Polymerase chain reaction conditions for TS16 and 18 primers were the same as for the GP primers, except that for TS16 and 18, the annealing temperatures were 61C and 63C respectively.

For PC03/PCO4 primers, the total 25L PCR reaction mixture contained 5 L sample, 12.5 L ready to use PCR mixture (Super Hot Master mix 2x, Bioron GmbH) and 0.4 pmol of each primer. The PCR thermal profile was 94C for 30 s, 51C for 30 s, 72C for 30 s and 5 minutes final extension at 72C.

Amplified PCR products were run on 2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The PCR products were identified on the basis of their predicted fragment size.

Data analysis done by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21 (SPSS 21): The demographic and clinical variables in both the groups were compared using Chi square test at significance level P value less than 0.05 and odd ratio at confidence interval of 95% calculated.

RESULTS

All the participants were screened through Pap smear for HPV. According to the Pap smear test result, out of 160 healthy women 17 (10.62%) were found Pap smear positive. HPV DNA test on PCR reported that out of them 6 was HSIL (CIN2) which showed high risk of development of cancer. Out of these 5 cases were found Genotype 16 positive whereas no cases were detected for genotype 18. However one case remains undetected repeated twice. The remaining 11 positive cases for Pap smear were LSIL (CIN 1). Out of these, 3 were HPV positive at Genotype 16 whereas 5 were found HPV negative at DNA level and they were advised for follow up. The rest of 3 cases did not join the study after found positive for Pap smear (Fig.1).

Base line information of healthy women: Overall 160 healthy women selected for screening of HPV, 58 were = 40 years whereas 102 (63.7%) were greater than 40 years of age. Majority of the women (139 i.e. 86.9%) were all single only wife of their husband. For remaining 21 women (13.1%), their husbands

Table-II: Demographic features of asymptomatic women participants (N=160).

###Parameters###Pap Smear +ve 17 (10.62)Y###Pap Smear ve 143 (89.37)Y

###No.%###No. %

###Age (years)###40###9 15.5###49 84.5

###greater than 40###8 7.8###94 92.2

###Marital Status###Married with one wife###10 7.2###129 92.8

###Married with greater than 1 wife###7 33.3###14 66.7

###Age at sexual (years)###20###7 20.6###27 79.4

###greater than 20###107.9###11692.1

###Education###Illiterate###1231.6###26 68.4

###Literate###5 4.1###11795.9

###Residence###Urban###7 6.2###10693.8

###Rural###1021.3###37 78.7

###Income###Low###917###4483

###Middle###87.5###9992.5

Were married with more than one wife. Out of 160 healthy women, majority 122 (76.25%) were literate, belonged to middle income group (107 i.e.66.87%), residing in urban area (113 i.e. 70.62%) and having more than 2 children (113 i.e. 70.62%).

Only 44 participated women (i.e. 27.5%) were using hormonal contraceptives. Majority of women were Urdu speaking (17.20%) (Fig 2). Clinical findings of healthy women screened for HPV: Pap smear +ve result were found more in greater than 40 years of age group women which have an odd ratio of 2.15 as compared to the females of =40 years of age. According to the results, positive Pap smear was found more in those women whose age at first sexual intercourse was greater than 20 years having an odd ratio of 3.01.

In 17 positive pap smear women, history of STD (sexual transmitted disease) was found in 16 cases having an odd 47.55 with 95% CI =6.09-371.36. Previous screening with Pap smear test was done in 17 patients with negative results but repeat screening revealed 3 patients with positive results showing 1.9 times more chances to be screen positive for treatment of pre cancer in women who have not get regular screening for Pap smear.

DISCUSSION

Our study showed a high incidence of HPV infection in precancerous lesions. We further tried to determine the association of different socio- demographic factors with HPV infection. According to one study, the mean age of participants was 394.9 years.13 In other studies, the mean age was 38.111.04 and 37.59.4 years respectively.14,15 In our study mean age 42.375.69 years as compared to above studies.

In various studies majority participants belong to middle social class and were literate but with low education level.16 In another study it was assessed that among mediators affecting the progress from HSIL to cancer, education level also played the main role in easing the progression (OR = 4.20, P = 0.066).17 In a study 90.6% patients belonged to poor socioeconomic status.15 Our study results are similar to this as 72.6% were literate but their literacy level was not determined in our study. Similarly all the participants belonged to low or middle income groups.

Table-III: Risk factors associated with women who are pap smear positive (N=160).

###Parameters###Pap Smear +ve 17 (10.62)Y###Pap Smear ve 143 (89.37)Y

###No.%###No. %

###Post Coital Bleeding###Yes###12 54.5###10 45.5

###No###5 3.6###13396.4

###Vaginal Discharge###Yes###7 17.5###33 82.5

###No###10 8.3###11091.7

###Parity###2###6 12.8###41 87.2

###greater than 2###11 9.7###10290.3

###Contraceptive Use###Yes###3 6.8###41 93.2

###No###14 12.1###10287.9

In another study high prevalence of abnormal Pap smear was related to, early age at marriage and high parity.16 In other studies, parity, tobacco smoking and oral contraceptive use were the main risk factors.14,15 In our study, out of 17 Pap smear positive cases 10 belonged to that group in which women have got their first sexual inter course in the age of greater than 20 years. However in percentage vise, Pap smear was found more +ve in those women whose age at first sexual intercourse was =20 years having an odd of 3.01, parity was greater than 2 children 70.62% and contraceptive use was 50%. One of the studies concluded that oral contraceptive use is not associated with HPV prevalence. Our study results were also similar to it and we have also not found any correlation between the Pap smear positive and use of contraceptive in asymptomatic patients.

In a study prevalence of abnormal Pap smears was 12.2% and the highest prevalence of Pap abnormalities was found in the 41-50 years age group in both populations.16 In our study Pap smear was positive in only (10.62%) in healthy women. It is somewhat less than that quoted by other studies but it may be due to less number of participants in our study.

In a study conducted in Karachi by S. Khan HPV was positive in healthy asymptomatic females 15.42% (54/360).12 In our study 17/ 160 were pap smear positive 3 refused, 5 HPV negative and 9 (64.2%) were HPV-DNA positive with abnormal cytology result HSIL,6/9 (66.6%) LSIL, 3/9 (33.3%).

This result concluded the proportion of High risk HPV higher in women with abnormal cytology. HPV genotype 16 was the most commonly found genotype in women with (HSIL CIN-2) similarly even in (LSIL-CIN1) HPV genotype 16 was the commonest genotype.

CONCLUSION

A high incidence of HPV infection found in women with pre cancerous lesion of cervix in Pakistani women.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Pakistan has a significant burden of carcinoma cervix with rising changing trends of risk factors. It is established that well-organized free camps and regular cervical screening for early diagnosis and good quality cytology can reduce cervical cancer mortality. The introduction of HPV vaccination at age 15 to 25 could also effectively reduce the burden of cervical cancer in the coming decade.

The high rate of clinical presentation of patients in the advanced stages can be attributed to the lack of public awareness regarding cervical cancer screening programs. In addition to Pap smear, screening of women once or twice during their lifetime using a high sensitivity test such as HPV genotyping would be more logical and effective in a low resource country. Vaccination against HPV may have a greatest value in developing countries where 80% of global burden of cervical cancer occurs each year and where pap smear screening programs have been largely ineffective.

REFERENCES

1. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Mufioz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:244-265.

2. Pisani P, Parkin M, Baray F, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer. 1999;83:18-29.

3. Pisani P, Bray F, Parkin DM. Estimates of the world-wide prevalence of cancer for 25 sites in the adult population. Int J Cancer. 2002;97:7281.

4. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):74-108.

5. Cobb N, Paisano R. Cancer mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States: regional differences in Indian Health. Rockville (MD): Indian Health Service; 1997; pp. 1989-1993.

6. Yugawa T, Kiyono T. Molecular mechanisms of cervical carcinogenesis by high-risk human papillomaviruses: novel functions of E6 and E7 oncoproteins. Rev Med Virol. 2009;19:97-113.

7. Yousuf S, Syed S, Moazzam A, Lucky MH. Frequency of high risk human papillomavirus types in squamous cell carcinoma of cervix among women. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60(3):193-196.

8. Srivastava S, Gupta S, Roy JK. High prevalence of oncogenic HPV-16 in cervical smears of asymptomatic women of eastern Uttar Pradesh, India: A population-based study. J Biosci. 2012;37(1):63-72.

9. Sankaranarayanan R, Bhatla N, Gravitt PE, Basu P, Esmy PO, Ashrafunnessa KS, et al. Human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer prevention in India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal. Vaccine. 2008;26(Suppl 12):M43-52. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.05.005.

10. Andall-Brereton GM, Hosein F, Salas RA, Mohmmad W, Monteil MA, Goleski V, et al. Human papillomavirus genotypes and their prevalence in a cohort of women in Trinidad. Rev Pantam Salud Publica. 2011;29(4):220-226.

11. Apgar BS, Zoschnick L, Wright TC Jr. The 2001 Bethesda System terminology. Am Fam Physician. 2003; 68:1992-1998.

12. Bell MC, Schmidt-Grimminger D, Patrick S, Ryschon T, Linz L, Chauhan SC. High prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in American Indian women of the Northern plains. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107(2):236-241.

13. Khan S, Kazmi SU, Ali S, molecular epidemiology of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) in Pakistan, thesis's result for Ph.D. for Karachi University 2010.

14. Roteli-Martins, Maria C, Son AL, Serpa HL, Derchain SFM, Paul N, de-Matos JC, et al. Association between age at first sexual intercourse and subsequent human papillomavirus infection: results of a Brazilian screening program. Rev Bras Gynecol Obstet. 2007;29(11):580-587. doi: 10.1590/S0100- 72032007001100006.

15. Das CM, Shah N, Ghori A, Khursheed F, Zaheen Z. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasiain Patients attending Gynecological Outpatient Department of Tertiary Care Hospital. JLUMHS. 2013;12(1):44-48.

16. Kritpetcharat O, Wutichouy W, Sirijaichingkul S, Kritpetcharat P. Comparison of Pap Smear Screening Results between Akha Hill Tribe and Urban Women in Chiang Rai Province, Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Preven. 2012;13(11):5501-5504.

17. Pereira CR, Rosa ML, Vasconcelos GA, Faria PC, Cavalcanti SM, Oliveira LH. Human papillomavirus prevalence and predictors for cervical cancer among high-risk women from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:651-660.
COPYRIGHT 2015 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Geographic Code:9PAKI
Date:Jun 30, 2015
Words:3130
Previous Article:Frequency and outcome of treatment in polycystic ovaries related infertility.
Next Article:Performance improvement indicators of the Medical Records Department and Information Technology (IT) in hospitals.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters