Printer Friendly

Carotid Intima-media Thickness Measurements: Relations with Atherosclerosis, Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Application in Randomized Controlled Trials.

Byline: Michiel. Bots, Gregory. Evans, Charles. Tegeler, Rudy. Meijer


Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide and contributes considerably to morbidity. [sup][1],[2],[3] The underlying cause is atherosclerosis. [sup][4] The development of new preventive therapies is one of the steps to control the CVD epidemic. It is increasingly demanded that promising therapies be evaluated in trials using cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality (M and M) as a primary outcome. [sup][5] M and M trials, however, are very costly, often multicenter studies requiring thousands of participants, and with a long follow-up period. There is great interest in alternative endpoints that can be used as a valid alternative or proxy for CV M and M alternative endpoints (surrogate endpoints) allow for the evaluation of novel therapies in randomized controlled trials within a shorter timeframe, fewer participants, at lower costs, and with a shorter time to availability of trial results when compared to an M and M trial. These studies may show a direct effect on atherosclerosis progression and in the same time may serve to direct or exclude subsequent large M and M trials. A measure of atherosclerosis is intuitively a suitable alternative endpoint for CVD events as atherosclerosis is the disease between exposure to risk factors and the majority of CV events. Atherosclerosis can be noninvasively assessed from early to late stages of the disease process using different imaging techniques. [sup][6],[7],[8],[9]

B-mode ultrasound is one of those imaging techniques and has been used to obtain quantitative measurements of the carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and as such provides estimates for an individual on the absolute value (presence) and its change over time. [sup][10],[11] CIMT has been suggested to be an adequate alternative measurement for CV events (surrogate endpoint) in intervention studies. [sup][10],[11] Prentice and Boissel have proposed several criteria [Supplementary Table 1 [SUPPORTING:1]] for a surrogate endpoint that should have been met before it could be validly used. [sup][12] We set out to review literature and provide evidence for the validity of CIMT measurements as an alternative measurement for atherosclerosis elsewhere in the arterial system and for CV events.

Validity, Concept and Reproducibility of the Measurement


In 1986, Italian investigators reported for the first time the results of an in vitro study which compared direct measurements of arterial wall thickness by gross and microscopic examination with B-mode real-time imaging of those same specimens. [sup][13] Several studies followed. The overall conclusion was that CIMT measurements of the far wall closely relate to the true biological thickness of the vessel wall, whereas near wall CIMT measurements are an approximation of the true wall thickness. [sup][14],[15],[16],[17],[18] Since then, the number of scientific publication has increased steadily [Figure 1] and CIMT is currently one of the most widely used noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis employed by clinicians and clinical investigators, both to quantify the extent of subclinical disease and to monitor change over time.{Figure 1}

Acquisition of the images

Typically, the carotid artery is classified into three segments, each approximately 10 mm in length [Figure 2]. [sup][19] The most proximal segment, the 1 cm straight segment of the carotid artery immediately prior to the bifurcation, is the common carotid artery (CCA). Its distal boundary is identified by a divergence of the near and far walls as the artery begins to divide into its internal and external branches. This focal widening of the bifurcation extends over approximately 1 cm and is labeled the carotid bulb or bifurcation (CB). The distal margin is defined by the tip of the flow divider separating the diverging internal carotid artery (ICA) and external carotid artery. The final segment that is frequently examined is the proximal 1 cm of the ICA.{Figure 2}

As indicated in [Figure 3], CIMT has been assessed in a several ways, varying in side (left carotid artery, right carotid artery, or both), segment (common, bifurcation, and internal), wall (near wall and far wall on the image), and in angles (60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, and 300) by using an external arc for positioning (Meijer Carotid Arc [sup]R ). [sup][20] Some studies measure CIMT only once and choose an image in which the interfaces are most clear (i.e., single optimal B-mode image). [sup][21] Others searches for the point with the thickest CIMT (e.g., the highest burden of atherosclerosis). [sup][22] Others choose from multiple optimal B-mode images, [sup][23] or measure the CIMT from multiple images that were obtained from various standardized angles of interrogation [Figure 4]. The latter, using the Meijer Carotid Arc approach, allows for measurement at exactly the same location over time. [sup][23] It is important to realize that each measurement approach has its own specific characteristics. Since atherosclerosis is asymmetrically distributed across the carotid artery, selectively measuring only one angle is likely to ignore the asymmetric nature of the disease. [sup][24],[25] Furthermore, each measurement approach has its own characteristics with respect to the assessment of atherosclerosis progression, as previously shown. [sup][26] Finally, also measurement error or missing values tend to vary across the measurement approaches. [sup][27],[28]{Figure 3}{Figure 4}

Actual measurement of the images

Ultrasound images in CIMT studies are typically acquired at the study site, stored digitally, and send to a reading laboratory for offline reading. At the core lab, typically quality control and quality assurance typically takes place first before the actual readings can start. These actual readings can be performed using several different edge detection methods (semi-automatic or manual). [sup][29] Semi-automated edge detection is more often applied in settings where only the CCA is examined while manual edge detection is usually applied in settings where the carotid bifurcation and the ICA are also measured. [sup][30]

The main difference between semi-automated edge detection and manual edge detection, however, is the actual manual drawing of the lines on the interfaces with manual edge detection. With semi-automatic edge detection, the reader still may adjust or modify the automatically drawn lines when the reader judges that the lines were incorrectly placed. A major advantage of semi-automated edge detection programs, besides being less resource intensive and time-consuming, may be the reduction in variability in CIMT readings as a result of reduction in the variability between readers and reduction of change in reading behavior over time (reader drift). [sup][30] Many investigators have a clear view on this topic, mostly based on personal experience. Yet, there is little published evidence on this topic. Two recent studies indicated that manual and semi-automated edge detection of far wall common CIMT both result in high reproducibility, and largely show similar relations to CV risk factors, rates of change, and treatment effects. [sup][30],[31] Hence, choices between semi-automated and manual reading software for CIMT studies likely should be based on logistical and cost considerations rather than differences in expected data quality in populations with a low burden of atherosclerotic disease.

Reproducibility of the measurement for an individual

With reproducibility is meant that when an individual is measured today, the obtained value should be similar to that obtained tomorrow or next week. Between visit, reproducibility covers all sources that may affect the CIMT measurement: Position of the patient, image acquisition, reader variability, and within-patient variability in, for example, blood pressure or heart rate.

Although difficult to quantify, due to a wide variation in reporting of reproducibility results, it seems that the reproducibility of the CIMT measurements has improved considerably over the years. [sup][32] Studies reporting on the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), showed that the ICC ranged from 0.60 to 0.75 in studies conducted during the late eighties. [sup][33],[34],[35],[36],[37] whereas, more recent studies reported an ICC between 0.80 and 0.95. [sup][38],[39],[40] Of note, it seems that in studies that started as an observational study the reproducibility was less than in studies focuses on measuring progression. [sup][41],[42]

A number of reports from randomized controlled trials recently addressed the reproducibility of CIMT measurements based on various ultrasound protocols. [sup][28],[43],[44],[45],[46] In these trials, the ultrasound protocols were based on an assessment of both sides, all three segments, both walls and at least eight angles. With those data points, the interest was in providing the best balance between reproducibility, magnitude of CIMT change over time and its associated precision, and magnitude of effect of the intervention on CIMT change over time and its associated precision.

Relations with Established Cardiovascular Risk Factors

There is a wealth of evidence on the relation between unfavorable level of risk factors and increased CIMT. We made no attempt to refer to all the available publications on that issue. Most of the evidence comes from cross-sectional studies. Traditional risk factors such as ageing, male gender, elevated blood pressure, increased body mass index, high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, and smoking have shown to be related to increased CIMT. [sup][47],[48],[49],[50],[51],[52],[53],[54],[55],[56] These relations also hold for individuals with an Asian ancestry. [sup][57],[58],[59],[60],[61],[62],[63] In addition, increased CIMT has been associated with abnormalities in other organ systems such as the presence of white matter lesions in the brain, [sup][64] left ventricular hypertrophy. [sup][65],[66],[67] renal disease, [sup][68] and endothelial dysfunction measured at the level of the brachial artery. [sup][69]

Data on risk factors and change in CIMT or change in risk factors and change in CIMT is less readily available. [sup][70],[71],[72],[73] The Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities study in one of the earliest reports showed that baseline levels of established risk factors (such as diabetes, hypertension, LDL, and HDL cholesterol) were related to increased progression on CIMT. [sup][70]

Relation with Atherosclerosis Elsewhere in the Arterial System

A variety of studies evaluated the relation between CIMT and presence of atherosclerotic abnormalities elsewhere in the arterial system. Relations were shown for the presence of atherosclerotic abnormalities in the carotid bifurcation and the ICA, [sup][74],[75],[76] the abdominal aorta. [sup][77] the arteries of the lower extremities, [sup][78],[79] and the coronary arteries. [sup][80],[81]

In a recent systematic review, most of the studies (29 out of 33) showed a graded positive relationship between CIMT and angiographically assessed coronary atherosclerosis with correlation coefficients in the order of 0.3-0.4. [sup][82] Of importance, is to realize that these reported associations between carotid atherosclerosis and coronary atherosclerosis are of similar magnitude to those shown in autopsy studies.

Several studies looking at the relation between CIMT and coronary calcium showed similar kind of results. [sup][83],[84],[85] In studies using intravascular ultrasound, generally significant positive relations are found between angiographic left main coronary atherosclerosis and CIMT with correlation coefficients between 0.26 and 0.55. [sup][86]

In summary, the relationship found between CIMT and coronary atherosclerosis in various studies support the notion that CIMT measurements are reflecting atherosclerosis elsewhere.

Carotid Intima-media Thickness and the Relation with Future Cardiovascular Events

Several large observational studies studied the relation of CIMT with future events. [sup][87],[88],[89] In 2007, Lorenz et al . published a systematic review and meta-analysis of eight relevant general population-based studies that had reported on the ability of CIMT to predict future CV end points, including the three above, involving a total of 37,197 subjects followed for a mean of 5.5 years. [sup][90] They reported that for an absolute CIMT difference of 0.1 mm, the future risk of myocardial infarction increases by 10-15%, and the stroke risk increases by 13-18%. There is a number of studies performed in participants with an Asian ancestry showing results consistent with those found in Caucasians. [sup][91],[92],[93],[94],[95]

Currently, over 20 cohort studies that were performed among subjects with or without previous vascular disease, and with and without CVD risk factors, showed consistently that increased CIMT relates to increased CV risk, independently of established vascular risk factors. [sup][96],[97]

Lipid Lowering and Rate of Change in Carotid Intima-media Thickness

In [Supplementary Table 2 [SUPPORTING:2]], an overview is provided of several trials that have been performed to evaluate the effects of therapeutic interventions on the rate of change in CIMT. In those trials, the rate of change in CIMT over time was the primary endpoint. The majority have evaluated the efficacy of lipid-level modifying therapies, primarily statins. These trials exemplify the ability to measure change over time in CIMT, which is a sensitive enough marker to detect differences across treatment arms. [sup][98],[99],[100],[101],[102],[103],[104],[105],[106],[107],[108],[109],[110],[111],[112],[113],[114],[115],[116],[117],[118],[119],[120],[121],[122],[123],[124],[125],[126],[127],[128],[129],[130],[131],[132],[133],[134],[135],[136],[137],[138],[139],[140],[141],[142]

When the trials in which the efficacy of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are compared to placebo are reviewed, all trials, except for one, [sup][109] reported a statistically significant beneficial effect of statin therapy on rate of change in CIMT. In a meta-analysis of seven statin trials on different regimens, statin therapy was associated with a mean annual change in CIMT of −0.012 mm (95% confidence interval [ CI ]: −0.016 to −0.007). [sup][143] Another meta-analysis of 11 statin trials showed that the difference in the rate of change in CIMT between statin therapy and placebo was −0.040 mm (95% CI : −0.052 to −0.028). [sup][144] A systematic review by Huang et al . up to December 2011 identified 21 randomized controlled trials using different statins with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. This meta-analysis involving 6317 individuals showed that the pooled weighted mean difference in progression rate between statin therapy and placebo or usual care for the common CIMT was −0.029 mm (95% CI : −0.045, −0.013). [sup][145] Feng et al . performed a systematic search of the regular databases and a Chinese database up to January 2013 to studies comparing Rosuvastatin with a placebo or other statins on CIMT. [sup][146]

The statin trials indicate that statin therapy inhibits atherosclerotic disease at the subclinical stage and provide evidence that CIMT measurements are able to show the beneficial effects of statins. A point of interest and importance is that the effect of statins on rate of change in CIMT appeared to be different across different carotid walls and segments, which calls for assessment of information from different carotid segments in trials. [sup][26]

Rate of Change in Carotid Intima-media Thickness and Future Cardiovascular Events

Investigators have argued that data should become available that assesses whether a change in CIMT relates to change in risk of CV events. In particular in the clinical trial world, such an observation is regarded as a final part of the evidence chain to support the CIMT measurement for use in trials. [sup][147] Yet, studies to demonstrate that are difficult to conduct as they first need to show the impact of an intervention on rate of change in CIMT and next have sufficient sample size and follow-up time after this demonstration to assess the ability of measured CIMT change to account for subsequent changes in CVD risk. Importantly, most trials with excellent CIMT data on the rate of change in CIMT did not follow participants for the occurrence of events after the trial was finished. Moreover, these CIMT trials were not designed (too small sample size) for evaluation of vascular events. And thus data on change in CIMT induced by lipid-level modifying or blood pressure lowering therapies and change risk for CV events is very limited.

The only published paper is the Cholesterol Lowering Atherosclerosis Study (CLAS) trial. [sup][148] The 2-year CLAS trial demonstrated that colestipol-niacin therapy reduced rate of change in CIMT. The trial cohort subsequently was surveyed over an average of 8.8 years after the conclusion of CLAS to evaluate the posttrial incidence of coronary events. The trial showed statistically significant favorable results: That is, a lower rate of change in common CIMT over time was related to a lower risk of an event. Those with an annual common CIMT progression rate of 0.034 mm/year had a 2.9-fold higher CVD risk compared to those with a common CIMT progression rate of 0.011 mm or less. The risk for those with progression rates between 0.011 and 0.017 mm was increased 1.8-fold, and the risk for those with progression rates between 0.018 and 0.033 mm was increased 2.3-fold. In addition to this paper, Espeland et al . performed a meta-analysis showing that across the trials, statin therapy was associated with an average decrease of CIMT progression of 0.012 mm/year (95% CI , −0.016 to −0.007). [sup][143] Using the same studies, they performed a meta-analysis which yielded a risk reduction of 52% for CVD events. In this approach, the authors linked the CIMT benefit to the reduction of events.

In addition, the PROG-IMT initiative recently published their findings on the rate of change in CIMT and future events. [sup][41] PROG-IMT was based on a change in CIMT found in observational studies, so natural history in common CIMT rather than the pharmaceutically induced rate of change. No relation between the rate of change in common CIMT and risk of CV events was detected. The reproducibility between the first and the second CIMT measurement was surprisingly low (correlation coefficient <0.10). The IMPROVE study, a recent observational initiative performed in 7 centers in 5 European countries enrolled 3482 subjects, (median 64 years; 47.8% men) with 3 or more vascular risk factors, and was designed to assess CIMT progression. [sup][42] An increase in mean common CIMT of 0.058 mm was related to an increased risk of CV events of 11% (95% CI : 8%, 34%). The CIMT estimate based on the fastest change in any segment showed a progression rate of 0.27 mm/year. An increase of one standard deviation, that is, 0.26, was related to an increase in risk of 26% (95% CI : 8%, 44%). [sup][42] In a cohort of 342 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without history of CV events whose CIMT was assessed more than twice by ultrasonography were recruited and followed up for CV events, Okayama et al . showed that the change in CIMT was significantly associated with CV events, with a hazard ratio of 2.24 (95% CI , 1.25-4.03, using the median of CIMT change of 0.011,14 mm/year as cut point. [sup][149]

Recently, two meta-analyses were published trying to address this issue using aggregated data from published reports. [sup][150],[151] The two meta-analyses have been criticized because of flaws in the design and analyses. [sup][152],[153] Flaws include the misuse of the concept of atherosclerosis, pooling of trials carried out with treatments having heterogeneous efficacy and among patients, who had very different risk profiles; pooling of measurements from a wide variety of methodologies that shared a common name, "CIMT;" lack of power for detecting relationships using meta-regression techniques, and lastly, the ecologic fallacy. Hence, the conclusions of these two meta-analyses should not be considered appropriate. [sup][153]

At present, direct quantitative evidence to translate the reduction in CIMT progression rates in a reduction in clinical outcome is modestly available. [sup][148] Yet, the lack of such information does not invalidate the CIMT measurement for use in trials on atherosclerosis regression and reduction of CV risk.

Criteria of Prentice and Boissel to Support Surrogacy

Prentice and Boissel have proposed several criteria [Supplementary Table 1] for a surrogate marker that should have been met before it could be validly used. In the previous paragraphs, we have addressed in detail the criteria by Prentice (P1, P2 and P3 from the Supplementary Table 1). The criteria P4 is more difficult to address since it mandates studies in which data on the intervention, on the CIMT change and on clinical events are all present in one study. This type of data is only present from meta-analyses as performed by Espeland et al . [sup][143] They showed a pooled estimate between statin use and CV events of 0.48 (0.30, 0.78). When in the analyses they adjusted for the rate of change in CIMT, the pooled estimate was attenuated to 0.64 and no longer statistically significant ( P = 0.13). This suggests that changes in CIMT may account for some, but not all, of the effect of statins on CV events.

With respect to the evidence fitting the Boissel criteria:

*B1: Efficiency. CIMT measurements are relatively easy to obtain using noninvasive means and are can be obtained in nearly every individual. It is clear that M and M trials on lipid-level modifying therapies generally were conducted in thousands of participants with 5 years of follow-up, whereas CIMT trials have been performed in hundreds of participants who were followed for 24-36 months. [sup][26] *B2: Linkage. There is abundant evidence from several observational studies to suggest that increased CIMT is related to an increased risk of CV events. [sup][41],[96] The linkage between pharmaceutical induced rate of change in CIMT and future CV events has not been firmly established *B3: Congruency. The congruency argument is important and has a number of aspects that should be addressed. First, individuals with and without vascular disease should exhibit differences in CIMT, which has been clearly demonstrated. [sup][29] Moreover, evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests that CIMT change over time are larger in individual with CVD as compared to those without. The pooled annual common CIMT progression rate observed in the control arm of trials in patients with coronary heart disease was 0.0170 mm (SD 0.06 [median]). The reported estimate for the annual mean maximum CIMT progression rate was 0.0258 mm (SD 0.068 [median]). [sup][154] The second aspect is that anticipated clinical benefits should be deducible from the observed changes in the surrogate marker in the trials. As indicated under B2: Linkage, this type of evidence is not readily available yet. The third aspect deals with the notion that the surrogate should produce parallel estimates of risk and benefit as endpoints. This has been made likely by Espeland et al . [sup][143] Recently, the approach by Espeland has been substantiated and extended by a systematic review in which the agreement between the results from CIMT and M and M trials was assessed, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. [sup][155] Forty-eight CIMT trials were included. CIMT trials ( n = 20) on lipid-level modifying therapies were all, except one, in agreement with the M and M trial findings. These results demonstrate a strong congruency between results from a CIMT trial and an M and M trial using the same compound.

The Best Approach for Carotid Intima-media Thickness Trials

Based on the experience in previous large-scale trials there is a number of aspects that one may consider in designing a multicenter randomized controlled trial with CIMT as primary outcome parameter. [sup][29]

How to choose the best carotid intima-media thickness measurement: Side, segments, walls, and angles?

Guidelines on how to measure CIMT have been published. [sup][156],[157] Nevertheless, there are still no accepted standards on the most optimal ultrasound protocol for either single nor repeated CIMT assessments. Hence, choices on the CIMT ultrasound protocol to be used are generally based on experience and expert opinion rather than on solid evidence from methodological studies. Even though some methodological issues are being addressed, there are many outstanding topics that need to be further evaluated. The debate is about simple protocols versus extensive protocols. Important to realize is the setting for which a protocol is used. [sup][20] For protocols used in randomized controlled trials, emphasis is on assessment of the rate of change. A number of reports have provided evidence on the best balance between reproducibility, completeness of the data, magnitude of CIMT change over time and its associated precision, and magnitude of effect of intervention on CIMT change over time, and its associated precision. [sup][27],[28],[44],[45],[46] Trials evaluating the effect of lipid lowering on CIMT progression have shown that CIMT measurements of both the near and far wall measurements are superior to trials only having only far wall measurements. With respect the use of angle specific measurement, analyses from studies indicated that extensive ultrasound protocols including near and far wall measurements from two or more angles provide a better balance between high reproducibility, large progression rates, and large and precise intervention effects when compared to single angle protocols from the far wall alone. This may especially be beneficial in settings where sample sizes and effect sizes are small. With respect to segments (common versus all three segments), there are trials showing a beneficial response to an intervention on the rate of change in CIMT measured using a single angle far wall common CIMT measurement. [sup][26] The issue is that it remains unknown whether trials showing an effect on the CCA alone would have found a similar or improved effect if an extensive protocol has been used. There are trials that failed to show an intervention effect on the common CIMT, whereas a beneficial effect was found on the aggregate CIMT measure and on clinical events. These findings underscore our viewpoint that an ideal ultrasound protocol does not exist and that the choice for an ultrasound protocol always should depend on a well-considered evaluation of the expected rates of change and associated precision at the different carotid segments. However, as it remains impossible to predict at which carotid segment drug therapies will have their effect, [sup][26],[158] extensive protocols may be preferred.

Although studies with extensive ultrasound protocols may be considered the most precise and most comprehensive studies, there are disadvantages in terms of cost and logistics as well. Extensive ultrasound protocols take more time for acquisition and quantification. Moreover, extensive ultrasound protocols require more extensive training of sonographers than ultrasound protocols measuring the CCA alone. While the current evidence indicates that extensive ultrasound protocols do provide the highest quality data in intervention studies, the choice of the ultrasound protocol should always be based on the specific questions that one wants to address and the resources available. It should be noted that a less extensive protocol with careful quality control is always preferable to a more extensive protocol with inadequate quality control.

Missing data when having an extensive ultrasound protocol?

We showed that high levels of complete data can be obtained with extensive ultrasound protocols that include measurement from the carotid bifurcation and ICA. [sup][44],[45],[158] For example, in the METEOR study, the percentage of CIMT measurements at the baseline examinations was 94% for the near wall of the right ICA, and 96% for the near wall of the left ICA. Completeness on the other carotid artery sites, including the carotid bifurcation, was >99%. A high body mass index contributes to the incompleteness of CIMT measurements. [sup][158]

Sample size consideration for a trial

Sample size calculations for l trials generally use expected changes between groups, and variances obtained from literature. However, this approach neglects the impact of differences in trial design. Designs with a shorter duration of follow-up increased within-individual variance and required larger sample sizes to detect the same treatment effect. [sup][159],[160] In addition, reducing the number of scans at the end of the study from two to one increased and reducing the number of baseline scans from two to one further increased the required sample size. [sup][160]

What to do with implausible biological values?

Implausible CIMT values may refer to an observation within an individual that is far from the values observed in the remainder of the individuals. These implausible values are observed at a single time point and reflect extreme values of an individual relative to other individuals. However, in longitudinal datasets, implausible values may also occur within an individual with repeated measurements, that is, one of the repeated measurements is temporally far distant from the previous and/or subsequent measurements. No established cut-off values or rigid mathematical definition exists of what constitutes a biologically implausible value either between or within individuals. Hence, determining whether or not an observation is biologically implausible has subjective components. There are two options to deal with biologically implausible values. The first is to accept that they are a genuine part of the outcome of the study, and the second is to delete these values from the dataset. It is currently unclear to what extent implausible values affect the assessment of treatment effects. In METEOR, the percentage of biologically implausible CIMT values ranged from 0.6% to 9.7%, depending on the definition used. Across all definitions, removal of biologically implausible CIMT values marginally reduced standard errors and did not change the primary outcome. Given the relative subjectivity involved in defining biologically implausible CIMT values, removal of data should be discouraged in situations in which there is no immediate concern about the plausibility of the data. [sup][161]

Imputation needed or not?

Missing endpoint data are a common and severe problem in clinical trials in which the endpoint is repeatedly measured over time. Missing data may lead to bias in the point estimates or may affect precision. Several techniques have been described to deal with the impact of missing data. Multiple imputation (MI) has shown to be the preferred method for incomplete data situations where information on determinants or outcomes is missing. We empirically showed that MI of missing endpoint data prior to linear effects model analyses does not increase precision in the estimated rate of change in the endpoint. [sup][162] Hence, MI had no added value in this setting, and standard LME modeling remains the method of choice.

Batch reading or not?

In CIMT trials, carotid ultrasound scans are collected in central core laboratories (specialized vascular imaging centers) where CIMT is measured in a later stage. Typically, there are two approaches to read CIMT from images: Random continuous readings (nonbatch) and batch readings. [sup][154] In the nonbatch approach, CIMT measurements are performed continuously over the course of the study, by randomly allocating a reader to a scan that is received at the core laboratory. In batch reading, one reader reads all the scans of a certain participant in a short time period after collection of the last scan. A logistic advantage of nonbatch reading is efficiency and short lag time between data availability and completion of the trial. A disadvantage of nonbatch reading, however, may be the temporal component. In studies that last several years between the first CIMT measurements and the last CIMT measurements, theoretically a drift may occur in the estimates of the rate of change, due to change over time in measuring habits of reading personnel of the core laboratory. Drift may affect rates of change in theory. Drift should not affect treatment effects, as readers are blinded for assignment of the intervention, and thus potential drift is likely to affect both treatment arms and thereby the estimated difference between the treatment arms should remain equal. In batch reading, all images of one individual are collected at the end of the trial and CIMT is quantified from all images in a short time window by one "reader." Empirical data on this issue is, however, scarce. [sup][132]


Advances in the field of carotid ultrasound have been incremental, resulting in a steady decrease in measurement variability. Improvements in edge detection algorithms point toward increasing automation of CIMT measurements. The major advantage of CIMT is that it is completely noninvasive and can be repeated as often as required. It provides a continuous measure since all subjects have a measurable carotid wall. It is also relatively inexpensive to perform, and the technology is widely available. A graded relation between raising LDL cholesterol and increased CIMT is apparent. Increased CIMT has been shown consistently to relate the atherosclerotic abnormalities elsewhere in the arterial system. Moreover, increased CIMT predicts future vascular events in both populations from Caucasian ancestry and those from Asian ancestry. Furthermore, lipid-lowering therapy has been shown to affect CIMT progression within 12-18 months in properly designed trials with results congruent with clinical events trials. In conclusion, when one wants to evaluate the effect of a pharmaceutical intervention that is to be expected to beneficially affect atherosclerosis progression and to reduce CV event risk, the use of CIMT measurements over time is a valid, suitable, and evidence-based choice.

Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Chinese Medical Journal website.


We thank Eur Heart J , Eur J Epidemiol , and J Stroke for the permission of using their published figures in the present paper.

Financial support and sponsorship

This review has been made possible by an unrestricted grant from Astra Zeneca.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Bots previously received study grants for studies on carotid intima-media thickness and/or honoraria for professional input regarding issues on carotid intima-media thickness from Astra-Zeneca, Icelandic Heart Foundation, Organon, Pfizer, Dutch Foundation, Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Servier and Unilever. Dr. Bots runs the Vascular Imaging Center, a core laboratory for the quantification of noninvasively assessed atherosclerosis in observational and intervention studies. Mr. Evans has received honoraria, consulting fees and grant support for professional input on CIMT issues from Astra-Zeneca, Organon, and Pfizer.


1. World Health Organization. The World Health Report; 2008. Available from: [Last accessed on 2009 Jun 07].

2. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: Systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2*7 million participants. Lancet 2011;378:31-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60679-X.

3. Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, et al . National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: Systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet 2011;377:557-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62037-5.

4. Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation 2002;105:1135-43.

5. Revkin JH, Shear CL, Pouleur HG, Ryder SW, Orloff DG. Biomarkers in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis: Need, validation, and future. Pharmacol Rev 2007;59:40-53.

6. Geerts CC, Bots ML, Grobbee DE, Uiterwaal CS. Parental smoking and vascular damage in young adult offspring: Is early life exposure critical? The atherosclerosis risk in young adults study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008;28:2296-302. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.173229.

7. Hulten E, Mitchell J, Scally J, Gibbs B, Villines TC. HIV positivity, protease inhibitor exposure and subclinical atherosclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Heart 2009;95:1826-35.

8. van Oijen M, de Jong FJ, Witteman JC, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM. Atherosclerosis and risk for dementia. Ann Neurol 2007;61:403-10.

9. Janssen I, Powell LH, Matthews KA, Cursio JF, Hollenberg SM, Sutton-Tyrrell K, et al. Depressive symptoms are related to progression of coronary calcium in midlife women: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) Heart Study. Am Heart J 2011;161:1186-91.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.017.

10. Bots ML, Sutton-Tyrrell K. Lessons from the past and promises for the future for carotid intima-media thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.061.

11. Urbina EM, Williams RV, Alpert BS, Collins RT, Daniels SR, Hayman L, et al. Noninvasive assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis in children and adolescents: Recommendations for standard assessment for clinical research: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension 2009;54:919-50. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.192639.

12. Prentice RL. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Definition and operational criteria. Stat Med 1989;8:431-40.

13. Pignoli P, Tremoli E, Poli A, Oreste P, Paoletti R. Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: A direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1986;74:1399-406.

14. Wong M, Edelstein J, Wollman J, Bond MG. Ultrasonic-pathological comparison of the human arterial wall. Verification of intima-media thickness. Arterioscler Thromb 1993;13:482-6.

15. Gamble G, Beaumont B, Smith H, Zorn J, Sanders G, Merrilees M, et al. B-mode ultrasound images of the carotid artery wall: Correlation of ultrasound with histological measurements. Atherosclerosis 1993;102:163-73.

16. Wendelhag I, Gustavsson T, Suurkula M, Berglund G, Wikstrand J. Ultrasound measurement of wall thickness in the carotid artery: Fundamental principles and description of a computerized analysing system. Clin Physiol 1991;11:565-77.

17. Persson J, Formgren J, Israelsson B, Berglund G. Ultrasound-determined intima-media thickness and atherosclerosis. Direct and indirect validation. Arterioscler Thromb 1994;14:261-4.

18. Gussenhoven EJ, Essed CE, Lancee CT, Mastik F, Frietman P, van Egmond FC, et al. Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: An in vitro study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14:947-52.

19. O'Leary DH, Bots ML. Imaging of atherosclerosis: Carotid intima-media thickness. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1682-9.

20. Peters SA, den Ruijter HM, Bots ML; METEOR Study Group. Measuring carotid intima-media thickness: Extensive ultrasound protocols have value. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012;25:1128-30. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.04.017.

21. Salonen R, Salonen JT. Determinants of carotid intima-media thickness: A population-based ultrasonography study in eastern Finnish men. J Intern Med 1991;229:225-31.

22. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: The Rotterdam Study. Circulation 1997;96:1432-7.

23. Oren A, Vos LE, Uiterwaal CS, Bak AA, Gorissen WH, Grobbee DE, Bots ML. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Young Adults (ARYA) study: rationale and design. Eur J Epidemiol 2003;18:715-27.

24. Tajik P, Meijer R, Duivenvoorden R, Peters SA, Kastelein JJ, Visseren FJ, et al. Asymmetrical distribution of atherosclerosis in the carotid artery: Identical patterns across age, race, and gender. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012;19:687-97. doi: 10.1177/1741826711410821.

25. Espeland MA, Hoen H, Byington R, Howard G, Riley WA, Furberg CD. Spatial distribution of carotid intimal-medial thickness as measured by B-mode ultrasonography. Stroke 1994;25:1812-9.

26. Peters SA, den Ruijter HM, Bots ML. Attenuation of rate of change in carotid intima-media thickness by lipid-modifying drugs: Impact on clinical outcomes. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2011;11:253-63. doi: 10.2165/11591960-000000000-00000.

27. Peters SA, den Ruijter HM, Bots ML. Ultrasound protocols to measure carotid intima-media thickness: One size does not fit all. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012;25:1135-7. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.08.003.

28. Dogan S, Plantinga Y, Crouse JR 3 [sup]rd , Evans GW, Raichlen JS, O'Leary DH, et al. Algorithms to measure carotid intima-media thickness in trials: A comparison of reproducibility, rate of progression and treatment effect. J Hypertens 2011;29:2181-93. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834b0eba.

29. Peters SA, Bots ML. Carotid intima-media thickness studies: Study design and data analysis. J Stroke 2013;15:38-48. doi: 10.5853/jos.2013.15.1.38.

30. Peters SA, den Ruijter HM, Palmer MK, Grobbee DE, Crouse JR 3 [sup]rd , O'Leary DH, et al. Manual or semi-automated edge detection of the maximal far wall common carotid intima-media thickness: A direct comparison. J Intern Med 2012;271:247-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02422.x.

31. Freire CM, Ribeiro AL, Barbosa FB, Nogueira AI, de Almeida MC, Barbosa MM, et al. Comparison between automated and manual measurements of carotid intima-media thickness in clinical practice. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2009;5:811-7.

32. Kanters SD, Algra A, van Leeuwen MS, Banga JD. Reproducibility of in vivo carotid intima-media thickness measurements: A review. Stroke 1997;28:665-71.

33. Bots ML, Mulder PG, Hofman A, van Es GA, Grobbee DE. Reproducibility of carotid vessel wall thickness measurements. The Rotterdam Study. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:921-30.

34. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Wolfson SK Jr, Bond MG, Bommer W, Sheth S, et al. Use of sonography to evaluate carotid atherosclerosis in the elderly. The Cardiovascular Health Study. CHS Collaborative Research Group. Stroke 1991;22:1155-63.

35. Riley WA, Barnes RW, Applegate WB, Dempsey R, Hartwell T, Davis VG, et al. Reproducibility of noninvasive ultrasonic measurement of carotid atherosclerosis. The Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Plaque Study. Stroke 1992;23:1062-8.

36. Salonen R, Haapanen A, Salonen JT. Measurement of intima-media thickness of common carotid arteries with high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography: Inter-and intra-observer variability. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991;17:225-30.

37. Furberg CD, Adams HP Jr, Applegate WB, Byington RP, Espeland MA, Hartwell T, et al. Effect of lovastatin on early carotid atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events. Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Progression Study (ACAPS) Research Group. Circulation 1994;90:1679-87.

38. Bots ML, Evans GW, Riley W, Meijer R, McBride KH, Paskett ED, et al. The Osteoporosis Prevention and Arterial effects of tiboLone (OPAL) study: Design and baseline characteristics. Control Clin Trials 2003;24:752-75.

39. Crouse JR rd, Grobbee DE, O'Leary DH, Bots ML, Evans GW, Palmer MK, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness in low-risk individuals with asymptomatic atherosclerosis: Baseline data from the METEOR study. Curr Med Res Opin 2007;23:641-8.

40. Kastelein JJ, van Leuven SI, Evans GW, Riley WA, Revkin JH, Shear CL, et al. Designs of RADIANCE 1 and 2: Carotid ultrasound studies comparing the effects of torcetrapib/atorvastatin with atorvastatin alone on atherosclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 2007;23:885-94.

41. Lorenz MW, Polak JF, Kavousi M, Mathiesen EB, Volzke H, Tuomainen TP, et al . Carotid intima-media thickness progression to predict cardiovascular events in the general population (the PROG-IMT collaborative project): A meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 2012;379:2053-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60441-3.

42. Baldassarre D, Hamsten A, Veglia F, de Faire U, Humphries SE, Smit AJ, et al . Measurements of carotid intima-media thickness and of interadventitia common carotid diameter improve prediction of cardiovascular events: Results of the IMPROVE (Carotid Intima Media Thickness [IMT] and IMT-Progression as Predictors of Vascular Events in a High Risk European Population) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1489-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.034.

43. Dogan S, Plantinga Y, Dijk JM, van der GY, Grobbee DE, Bots ML. Manual B-mode versus automated radio-frequency carotid intima-media thickness measurements. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:1137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.07.008.

44. Dogan S, Duivenvoorden R, Grobbee DE, Kastelein JJ, Shear CL, Evans GW, et al. Ultrasound protocols to measure carotid intima-media thickness in trials; comparison of reproducibility, rate of progression, and effect of intervention in subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia and subjects with mixed dyslipidemia. Ann Med 2010;42:447-64. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.499132.

45. Dogan S, Duivenvoorden R, Grobbee DE, Kastelein JJ, Shear CL, Evans GW, et al . Completeness of carotid intima media thickness measurements depends on body composition: The RADIANCE 1 and 2 trials. J Atheroscler Thromb 2010;17:526-35.

46. Dogan S, Plantinga Y, Evans GW, Meijer R, Grobbee DE, Bots ML; OPAL investigators. Ultrasound protocols to measure carotid intima-media thickness: A post-hoc analysis of the OPAL study. Curr Med Res Opin 2009;25:109-22. doi: 10.1185/03007990802589727.

47. Handa N, Matsumoto M, Maeda H, Hougaku H, Ogawa S, Fukunaga R, et al. Ultrasonic evaluation of early carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke 1990;21:1567-72.

48. Dempsey RJ, Moore RW. Amount of smoking independently predicts carotid artery atherosclerosis severity. Stroke 1992;23:693-6.

49. Bots ML, Hofman A, de Bruyn AM, de Jong PT, Grobbee DE. Isolated systolic hypertension and vessel wall thickness of the carotid artery. The Rotterdam Elderly Study. Arterioscler Thromb 1993;13:64-9.

50. Psaty BM, Furberg CD, Kuller LH, Borhani NO, Rautaharju PM, O'Leary DH, et al. Isolated systolic hypertension and subclinical cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Initial findings from the Cardiovascular Health Study. JAMA 1992;268:1287-91.

51. Heiss G, Sharrett AR, Barnes R, Chambless LE, Szklo M, Alzola C. Carotid atherosclerosis measured by B-mode ultrasound in populations: Associations with cardiovascular risk factors in the ARIC study. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134:250-6.

52. Bonithon-Kopp C, Scarabin PY, Taquet A, Touboul PJ, Malmejac A, Guize L. Risk factors for early carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged French women. Arterioscler Thromb 1991;11:966-72.

53. Prati P, Vanuzzo D, Casaroli M, Di Chiara A, De Biasi F, Feruglio GA, et al. Prevalence and determinants of carotid atherosclerosis in a general population. Stroke 1992;23:1705-11.

54. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Kittner SJ, Bond MG, Wolfson SK Jr, et al . Distribution and correlates of sonographically detected carotid artery disease in theCardiovascular Health Study. The CHS Collaborative Research Group. Stroke 1992;23:1752-60.

55. el-Barghouti N, Elkeles R, Nicolaides A, Geroulakos G, Dhanjil S, Diamond J. The ultrasonic evaluation of the carotid intima-media thickness and its relation to risk factors of atherosclerosis in normal and diabetic population. Int Angiol 1997;16:50-4.

56. den Ruijter HM, Peters SA, Groenewegen KA, Anderson TJ, Britton AR, Dekker JM, et al . Common carotid intima-media thickness does not add to Framingham risk score in individuals with diabetes mellitus: The USE-IMT initiative. Diabetologia 2013;56:1494-502. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2898-9.

57. Liang Y, Yan Z, Sun B, Cai C, Jiang H, Song A, Qiu C. Cardiovascular risk factor profiles for peripheral artery disease and carotid atherosclerosis among Chinese older people: A population-based study. PLoS One 2014;9:e85927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085927.

58. Geroulakos G, O'Gorman DJ, Kalodiki E, Sheridan DJ, Nicolaides AN. The carotid intima-media thickness as a marker of the presence of severe symptomatic coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 1994;15:781-5.

59. Ebrahim S, Papacosta O, Whincup P, Wannamethee G, Walker M, Nicolaides AN, et al. Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: The British Regional Heart Study. Stroke 1999;30:841-50.

60. Oren A, Vos LE, Uiterwaal CS, Grobbee DE, Bots ML. Cardiovascular risk factors and increased carotid intima-media thickness in healthy young adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Young Adults (ARYA) Study. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1787-92.

61. Geroulakos G, O'Gorman D, Nicolaides A, Sheridan D, Elkeles R, Shaper AG. Carotid intima-media thickness: Correlation with the British Regional Heart Study risk score. J Intern Med 1994;235:431-3.

62. Sakurai S, Kitamura A, Cui R, Yamagishi K, Tanigawa T, Iso H. Relationships of soluble E-selectin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese men. J Atheroscler Thromb 2009;16:339-45.

63. Baldassarre D, De Jong A, Amato M, Werba JP, Castelnuovo S, Frigerio B, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness and markers of inflammation, endothelial damage and hemostasis. Ann Med 2008;40:21-44.

64. Bots ML, van Swieten JC, Breteler MM, de Jong PT, van Gijn J, Hofman A, et al. Cerebral white matter lesions and atherosclerosis in the Rotterdam Study. Lancet 1993;341:1232-7.

65. Linhart A, Gariepy J, Giral P, Levenson J, Simon A. Carotid artery and left ventricular structural relationship in asymptomatic men at risk for cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis 1996;127:103-12.

66. Cuspidi C, Lonati L, Sampieri L, Leonetti G, Zanchetti A. Similarities and differences in structural and functional changes of left ventricle and carotid arteries in young borderline hypertensives and in athletes. J Hypertens 1996;14:759-64.

67. Cuspidi C, Lonati L, Sampieri L, Pelizzoli S, Pontiggia G, Leonetti G, et al. Left ventricular concentric remodelling and carotid structural changes in essential hypertension. J Hypertens 1996;14:1441-6.

68. Mykkanen L, Zaccaro DJ, O'Leary DH, Howard G, Robbins DC, Haffner SM. Microalbuminuria and carotid artery intima-media thickness in nondiabetic and NIDDM subjects. The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS). Stroke 1997;28:1710-6.

69. Hashimoto M, Eto M, Akishita M, Kozaki K, Ako J, Iijima K, et al. Correlation between flow-mediated vasodilatation of the brachial artery and intima-media thickness in the carotid artery in men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:2795-800.

70. Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Davis V, Sharrett R, Heiss G, Sorlie P, et al. Risk factors for progression of common carotid atherosclerosis: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, 1987-1998. Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:38-47.

71. Lorenz MW, Karbstein P, Markus HS, Sitzer M. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein is not associated with carotid intima-media progression: The carotid atherosclerosis progression study. Stroke 2007;38:1774-9.

72. Tattersall MC, Gassett A, Korcarz CE, Gepner AD, Kaufman JD, Liu KJ, et al. Predictors of carotid thickness and plaque progression during a decade: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Stroke 2014;45:3257-62. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005669.

73. Bots ML, Visseren FL, Evans GW, Riley WA, Revkin JH, Tegeler CH, et al. Torcetrapib and carotid intima-media thickness in mixed dyslipidaemia (RADIANCE 2 study): A randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2007;370:153-60.

74. Polak JF, O'Leary DH, Kronmal RA, Wolfson SK, Bond MG, Tracy RP, et al. Sonographic evaluation of carotid artery atherosclerosis in the elderly: Relationship of disease severity to stroke and transient ischemic attack. Radiology 1993;188:363-70.

75. Howard G, Burke GL, Evans GW, Crouse JR 3 [sup]rd , Riley W, Arnett D, et al. Relations of intimal-medial thickness among sites within the carotid artery as evaluated by B-mode ultrasound. ARIC Investigators. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities. Stroke 1994;25:1581-7.

76. Bots ML, Hofman A, De Jong PT, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness as an indicator of atherosclerosis at other sites of the carotid artery. The Rotterdam Study. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6:147-53.

77. Bots ML, Witteman JC, Grobbee DE. Carotid intima-media wall thickness in elderly women with and without atherosclerosis of the abdominal aorta. Atherosclerosis 1993;102:99-105.

78. Bots ML, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and lower extremity arterial atherosclerosis. The Rotterdam Study. Arterioscler Thromb 1994;14:1885-91.

79. Allan PL, Mowbray PI, Lee AJ, Fowkes FG. Relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and symptomatic and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease. The Edinburgh Artery Study. Stroke 1997;28:348-53.

80. Cohen GI, Aboufakher R, Bess R, Frank J, Othman M, Doan D, et al. Relationship between carotid disease on ultrasound and coronary disease on CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:1160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.06.007.

81. Ogata T, Yasaka M, Yamagishi M, Seguchi O, Nagatsuka K, Minematsu K. Atherosclerosis found on carotid ultrasonography is associated with atherosclerosis on coronary intravascular ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:469-74.

82. Bots ML, Baldassarre D, Simon A, de Groot E, O'Leary DH, Riley W, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness and coronary atherosclerosis: Weak or strong relations? Eur Heart J 2007;28:398-406.

83. Taylor AJ, Bindeman J, Le TP, Bauer K, Byrd C, Feuerstein IM, et al. Progression of calcified coronary atherosclerosis: Relationship to coronary risk factors and carotid intima-media thickness. Atherosclerosis 2008;197:339-45.

84. Gronewold J, Bauer M, Lehmann N, Mahabadi AA, Kalsch H, Weimar C, et al. Coronary artery calcification, intima-media thickness, and ankle-brachial index are complementary stroke predictors. Stroke 2014;45:2702-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005626.

85. Amato M, Montorsi P, Ravani A, Oldani E, Galli S, Ravagnani PM, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness by B-mode ultrasound as surrogate of coronary atherosclerosis: Correlation with quantitative coronary angiography and coronary intravascular ultrasound findings. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2094-101.

86. Oh BH, Kaligis RW, Wang Y, Punzalan FE, Suwanwela NC, Nguyen VL, et al. Survey of atherosclerotic disease in Asian subjects with cardiovascular disease risk factors who were not receiving lipid-lowering agents. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:2761-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.132.

87. Salonen JT, Salonen R. Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb 1991;11:1245-9.

88. Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, Rosamond W, Szklo M, Sharrett AR, et al. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987-1993. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:483-94.

89. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK Jr. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340:14-22.

90. Lorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML, Rosvall M, Sitzer M. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2007;115:459-67.

91. Lee S, Cho GY, Kim HS, Yoon YE, Lee SP, Kim HK, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness as a risk factor for outcomes in Asian patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Can J Cardiol 2014;30:1620-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.06.026.

92. Chuang SY, Bai CH, Chen JR, Yeh WT, Chen HJ, Chiu HC, et al. Common carotid end-diastolic velocity and intima-media thickness jointly predict ischemic stroke in Taiwan. Stroke 2011;42:1338-44. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605477.

93. Kitamura A, Iso H, Imano H, Ohira T, Okada T, Sato S, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque characteristics as a risk factor for stroke in Japanese elderly men. Stroke 2004;35:2788-94.

94. Okazaki S, Furukado S, Abe Y, Tanaka M, Miwa K, Yamagami H, et al. Association of inflammatory markers and carotid intima-media thickness with the risk of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;30:180-7.

95. Xie W, Liang L, Zhao L, Shi P, Yang Y, Xie G, et al. Combination of carotid intima-media thickness and plaque for better predicting risk of ischaemic cardiovascular events. Heart 2011;97:1326-31. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2011.223032.

96. Den Ruijter HM, Peters SA, Anderson TJ, Britton AR, Dekker JM, Eijkemans MJ, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness measurements in cardiovascular risk prediction: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2012;308:796-803. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.9630.

97. Lorenz MW, Bickel H, Bots ML, Breteler MM, Catapano AL, Desvarieux M, et al. Individual progression of carotid intima media thickness as a surrogate for vascular risk (PROG-IMT): Rationale and design of a meta-analysis project. Am Heart J 2010;159:730-6.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.02.008.

98. Kastelein JJ, Akdim F, Stroes ES, Zwinderman AH, Bots ML, Stalenhoef AF, et al. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1431-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800742.

99. Taylor AJ, Sullenberger LE, Lee HJ, Lee JK, Grace KA. Arterial biology for the investigation of the treatment effects of reducing cholesterol (ARBITER) 2: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of extended-release niacin on atherosclerosis progression in secondary prevention patients treated with statins. Circulation 2004;110:3512-7.

100. Hiukka A, Westerbacka J, Leinonen ES, Watanabe H, Wiklund O, Hulten LM, et al. Long-term effects of fenofibrate on carotid intima-media thickness and augmentation index in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.049.

101. Meuwese MC, de Groot E, Duivenvoorden R, Trip MD, Ose L, Maritz FJ, et al. ACAT inhibition and progression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: The CAPTIVATE randomized trial. JAMA 2009;301:1131-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.301.11.1131.

102. Kastelein JJ, van Leuven SI, Burgess L, Evans GW, Kuivenhoven JA, Barter PJ, et al. Effect of torcetrapib on carotid atherosclerosis in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1620-30.

103. Wiklund O, Hulthe J, Wikstrand J, Schmidt C, Olofsson SO, Bondjers G. Effect of controlled release/extended release metoprolol on carotid intima-media thickness in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A 3-year randomized study. Stroke 2002;33:572-7.

104. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Lobo RA, Shoupe D, Sevanian A, Mahrer PR, et al. Estrogen in the prevention of atherosclerosis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:939-53.

105. Taylor AJ, Kent SM, Flaherty PJ, Coyle LC, Markwood TT, Vernalis MN. ARBITER: Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol: A randomized trial comparing the effects of atorvastatin and pravastatin on carotid intima medial thickness. Circulation 2002;106:2055-60.

106. Smilde TJ, van Wissen S, Wollersheim H, Trip MD, Kastelein JJ, Stalenhoef AF. Effect of aggressive versus conventional lipid lowering on atherosclerosis progression in familial hypercholesterolaemia (ASAP): A prospective, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2001;357:577-81.

107. Hedblad B, Wikstrand J, Janzon L, Wedel H, Berglund G. Low-dose metoprolol CR/XL and fluvastatin slow progression of carotid intima-media thickness: Main results from the Beta-Blocker Cholesterol-Lowering Asymptomatic Plaque Study (BCAPS). Circulation 2001;103:1721-6.

108. Mercuri M, Bond MG, Sirtori CR, Veglia F, Crepaldi G, Feruglio FS, et al. Pravastatin reduces carotid intima-media thickness progression in an asymptomatic hypercholesterolemic mediterranean population: The Carotid Atherosclerosis Italian Ultrasound Study. Am J Med 1996;101:627-34.

109. Beishuizen ED, van de Ree MA, Jukema JW, Tamsma JT, van der Vijver JC, Meinders AE, et al. Two-year statin therapy does not alter the progression of intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes without manifest cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2887-92.

110. Anderssen SA, Hjelstuen AK, Hjermann I, Bjerkan K, Holme I. Fluvastatin and lifestyle modification for reduction of carotid intima-media thickness and left ventricular mass progression in drug-treated hypertensives. Atherosclerosis 2005;178:387-97.

111. Shukla A, Sharma MK, Jain A, Goel PK. Prevention of atherosclerosis progression using atorvastatin in normolipidemic coronary artery disease patients - A controlled randomized trial. Indian Heart J 2005;57:675-80.

112. Salonen R, Nyyssonen K, Porkkala E, Rummukainen J, Belder R, Park JS, et al . Kuopio Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (KAPS). A population-based primary preventive trial of the effect of LDL lowering on atherosclerotic progression in carotid and femoral arteries. Circulation 1995;92:1758-64.

113. MacMahon S, Sharpe N, Gamble G, Hart H, Scott J, Simes J, et al. Effects of lowering average of below-average cholesterol levels on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis: Results of the LIPID Atherosclerosis Substudy. LIPID Trial Research Group. Circulation 1998;97:1784-90.

114. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, LaBree L, Selzer RH, Liu C, Liu C, et al. Reduction in carotid arterial wall thickness using lovastatin and dietary therapy: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:548-56.

115. Crouse JR 3 [sup]rd , Raichlen JS, Riley WA, Evans GW, Palmer MK, O'Leary DH, et al. Effect of rosuvastatin on progression of carotid intima-media thickness in low-risk individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis: the METEOR Trial. JAMA 2007;297:1344-53.

116. Crouse JR 3 [sup]rd , Byington RP, Bond MG, Espeland MA, Craven TE, Sprinkle JW, et al. Pravastatin, lipids, and atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries (PLAC-II). Am J Cardiol 1995;75:455-9.

117. de Groot E, Jukema JW, Montauban van Swijndregt AD, Zwinderman AH, Ackerstaff RG, van der Steen AF, et al. B-mode ultrasound assessment of pravastatin treatment effect on carotid and femoral artery walls and its correlations with coronary arteriographic findings: A report of the Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1561-7.

118. Howard BV, Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Fleg JL, Galloway JM, Henderson JA, et al. Effect of lower targets for blood pressure and LDL cholesterol on atherosclerosis in diabetes: The SANDS randomized trial. JAMA 2008;299:1678-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.14.1678.

119. Zanchetti A, Crepaldi G, Bond MG, Gallus G, Veglia F, Mancia G, et al. Different effects of antihypertensive regimens based on fosinopril or hydrochlorothiazide with or without lipid lowering by pravastatin on progression of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis: Principal results of PHYLLIS - A randomized double-blind trial. Stroke 2004;35:2807-12.

120. Lonn E, Yusuf S, Dzavik V, Doris C, Yi Q, Smith S, et al. Effects of ramipril and Vitamin E on atherosclerosis: The study to evaluate carotid ultrasound changes in patients treated with ramipril and Vitamin E (SECURE). Circulation 2001;103:919-25.

121. Lonn EM, Gerstein HC, Sheridan P, Smith S, Diaz R, Mohan V, et al. Effect of ramipril and of rosiglitazone on carotid intima-media thickness in people with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: STARR (STudy of Atherosclerosis with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone). J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:2028-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.072.

122. MacMahon S, Sharpe N, Gamble G, Clague A, Mhurchu CN, Clark T, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, Ramipril, in patients with coronary or other occlusive arterial disease. PART-2 Collaborative Research Group. Prevention of Atherosclerosis with Ramipril. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:438-43.

123. Zanchetti A, Bond MG, Hennig M, Neiss A, Mancia G, Dal Palu C, et al. Calcium antagonist lacidipine slows down progression of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis: Principal results of the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA), a randomized, double-blind, long-term trial. Circulation 2002;106:2422-7.

124. Simon A, Gariepy J, Moyse D, Levenson J. Differential effects of nifedipine and co-amilozide on the progression of early carotid wall changes. Circulation 2001;103:2949-54.

125. Borhani NO, Mercuri M, Borhani PA, Buckalew VM, Canossa-Terris M, Carr AA, et al. Final outcome results of the Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study (MIDAS). A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1996;276:785-91.

126. Pitt B, Byington RP, Furberg CD, Hunninghake DB, Mancini GB, Miller ME, et al. Effect of amlodipine on the progression of atherosclerosis and the occurrence of clinical events. PREVENT Investigators. Circulation 2000;102:1503-10.

127. Stanton AV, Chapman JN, Mayet J, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Hughes AD, et al. Effects of blood pressure lowering with amlodipine or lisinopril on vascular structure of the common carotid artery. Clin Sci (Lond) 2001;101:455-64.

128. Hoogerbrugge N, de Groot E, de Heide LH, de Ridder MA, Birkenhageri JC, Stijnen T, et al. Doxazosin and hydrochlorothiazide equally affect arterial wall thickness in hypertensive males with hypercholesterolaemia (the DAPHNE study). Doxazosin Atherosclerosis Progression Study in Hypertensives in the Netherlands. Neth J Med 2002;60:354-61.

129. Ludwig M, Stapff M, Ribeiro A, Fritschka E, Tholl U, Smith RD, et al. Comparison of the effects of losartan and atenolol on common carotid artery intima-media thickness in patients with hypertension: Results of a 2-year, double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Clin Ther 2002;24:1175-93.

130. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, LaBree L, Mahrer PR, Sevanian A, Liu CR, et al. Alpha-tocopherol supplementation in healthy individuals reduces low-density lipoprotein oxidation but not atherosclerosis: The Vitamin E Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (VEAPS). Circulation 2002;106:1453-9.

131. Magliano D, McNeil J, Branley P, Shiel L, Demos L, Wolfe R, et al. The melbourne atherosclerosis Vitamin E trial (MAVET): A study of high dose Vitamin E in smokers. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006;13:341-7.

132. Durga J, Bots ML, Schouten EG, Grobbee DE, Kok FJ, Verhoef P. Effect of 3 y of folic acid supplementation on the progression of carotid intima-media thickness and carotid arterial stiffness in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93:941-9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.006429.

133. Zoungas S, McGrath BP, Branley P, Kerr PG, Muske C, Wolfe R, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Atherosclerosis and Folic Acid Supplementation Trial (ASFAST) in chronic renal failure: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1108-16.

134. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Dustin L, Mahrer PR, Azen SP, Detrano R, et al. High-dose B Vitamin supplementation and progression of subclinical atherosclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2009;40:730-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.526798.

135. Manson JE, Hsia J, Johnson KC, Rossouw JE, Assaf AR, Lasser NL, et al. Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2003;349:523-34.

136. Bots ML, Evans GW, Riley W, McBride KH, Paskett ED, Helmond FA, et al . The effect of tibolone and continuous combined conjugated equine oestrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate on progression of carotid intima-media thickness: The Osteoporosis Prevention and Arterial effects of tiboLone (OPAL) study. Eur Heart J 2006;27:746-55.

137. Byington RP, Furberg CD, Herrington DM, Herd JA, Hunninghake D, Lowery M, et al. Effect of estrogen plus progestin on progression of carotid atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women with heart disease: HERS B-mode substudy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002;22:1692-7.

138. Colacurci N, Fornaro F, Cobellis L, De FP, Torella M, Sepe E, et al . Raloxifene slows down the progression of intima-media thickness in postmenopausal women. Menopause 2007;14:879-84.

139. Wilcox R, Kupfer S, Erdmann E; PROactive Study investigators. Effects of pioglitazone on major adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes: Results from PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macro Vascular Events (PROactive 10). Am Heart J 2008;155:712-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.029.

140. Langenfeld MR, Forst T, Hohberg C, Kann P, Lubben G, Konrad T, et al. Pioglitazone decreases carotid intima-media thickness independently of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from a controlled randomized study. Circulation 2005;111:2525-31.

141. Hedblad B, Zambanini A, Nilsson P, Janzon L, Berglund G. Rosiglitazone and carotid IMT progression rate in a mixed cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes and the insulin resistance syndrome: Main results from the Rosiglitazone Atherosclerosis Study. J Intern Med 2007;261:293-305.

142. O'Leary DH, Reuwer AQ, Nissen SE, Despres JP, Deanfield JE, Brown MW, et al. Effect of rimonabant on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) progression in patients with abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome: The AUDITOR Trial. Heart 2011;97:1143-50. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2011.223446.

143. Espeland MA, O'leary DH, Terry JG, Morgan T, Evans G, Mudra H. Carotid intimal-media thickness as a surrogate for cardiovascular disease events in trials of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2005;6:3.

144. Amarenco P, Labreuche J, Lavallee P, Touboul PJ. Statins in stroke prevention and carotid atherosclerosis: Systematic review and up-to-date meta-analysis. Stroke 2004;35:2902-9.

145. Huang Y, Li W, Dong L, Li R, Wu Y. Effect of statin therapy on the progression of common carotid artery intima-media thickness: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Atheroscler Thromb 2013;20:108-21.

146. Feng X, Zhang J, Liu M, Li X. Impact on the carotid intima-medial thickness and safety of rosuvastatin in Chinese patients with carotid atherosclerosis: A meta-analysis (in Chinese). Chin J Cardiol 2014;42:247-53.

147. Domanski M, Pocock S, Bernaud C, Borer J, Geller N, Revkin J, et al. Surrogate endpoints in randomized cardiovascular clinical trials. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2011;25:411-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2010.00865.x.

148. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, LaBree L, Selzer RH, Liu CR, Liu CH, et al. The role of carotid arterial intima-media thickness in predicting clinical coronary events. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:262-9.

149. Okayama KI, Mita T, Gosho M, Yamamoto R, Yoshida M, Kanazawa A, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness progression predicts cardiovascular events in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2013;101:286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.06.008.

150. Goldberger ZD, Valle JA, Dandekar VK, Chan PS, Ko DT, Nallamothu BK. Are changes in carotid intima-media thickness related to risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction? A critical review and meta-regression analysis. Am Heart J 2010;160:701-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.029.

151. Costanzo P, Perrone-Filardi P, Vassallo E, Paolillo S, Cesarano P, Brevetti G, et al. Does carotid intima-media thickness regression predict reduction of cardiovascular events? A meta-analysis of 41 randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:2006-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.059.

152. Bots ML, Taylor AJ, Kastelein JJ, Peters SA, den Ruijter HM, Tegeler CH, et al. Rate of change in carotid intima-media thickness and vascular events: Meta-analyses can not solve all the issues. A point of view. J Hypertens 2012;30:1690-6.

153. Taylor AJ, Bots ML, Kastelein JJ. Vascular disease: Meta-regression of CIMT trials-data in, garbage out. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011;8:128-30. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.12.

154. Bots ML, Evans GW, Riley WA, Grobbee DE. Carotid intima-media thickness measurements in intervention studies: Design options, progression rates, and sample size considerations: A point of view. Stroke 2003;34:2985-94.

155. Peters SA, den Ruijter HM, Grobbee DE, Bots ML. Results from a carotid intima-media thickness trial as a decision tool for launching a large-scale morbidity and mortality trial. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:20-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.978114.

156. Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, Adams H, Amarenco P, Bornstein N, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3 [sup]rd , 4 [sup]th and 5 [sup]th watching the risk symposia, at the 13 [sup]th , 15 [sup]th and 20 [sup]th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012;34:290-6. doi: 10.1159/000343145.

157. Stein JH, Korcarz CE, Hurst RT, Lonn E, Kendall CB, Mohler ER, et al. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: A consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:93-111. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2007.11.011

158. Peters SA, den Ruijter HM, Palmer MK, Grobbee DE, Crouse JR 3 [sup]rd , O'Leary DH, et al. Extensive or restricted ultrasound protocols to measure carotid intima-media thickness: Analysis of completeness rates and impact on observed rates of change over time. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012;25:91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.09.009.

159. Peters SA, Palmer MK, Grobbee DE, Crouse JR 3 [sup]rd , Evans GW, Raichlen JS, et al. Effect of number of ultrasound examinations on the assessment of carotid intima-media thickness changes over time: The example of the METEOR study. J Hypertens 2011;29:1145-54. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328345d85e.

160. Peters SA, Palmer MK, den Ruijter HM, Grobbee DE, Crouse JR 3 [sup]rd , O'Leary DH, et al. Sample size requirements in trials using repeated measurements and the impact of trial design. Curr Med Res Opin 2012;28:681-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.678937.

161. Peters SA, den Ruijter HM, Palmer MK, Grobbee DE, Crouse JR 3 [sup]rd , O'Leary DH, et al. Biologically implausible carotid intima-media thickness measurement values: Effects on rate of change over time. Curr Med Res Opin 2012;28:891-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.689255.

162. Peters SA, Bots ML, den Ruijter HM, Palmer MK, Grobbee DE, Crouse JR 3 [sup]rd , et al. Multiple imputation of missing repeated outcome measurements did not add to linear mixed-effects models. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:686-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.012.
COPYRIGHT 2016 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Perspective
Author:Bots, Michiel; Evans, Gregory; Tegeler, Charles; Meijer, Rudy
Publication:Chinese Medical Journal
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2016
Previous Article:Surface Modification of Intraocular Lenses.
Next Article:Malposition of Central Venous Catheter: Presentation and Management.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters