Printer Friendly

Cardinal (Jean-Claude) Turcotte on Quebec independence.

Montreal - Jean-Claude Cardinal Turcotte, 61, is the other active cardinal in Canada. (There are also three retired ones, Louis-Albert Vachon, 86, in Quebec; Eduoard Gagnon, 80, in Rome; and Gerald Emmett Carter, 86, in Toronto).

On December 29, 1997, Cardinal Turcotte, interviewed by the Montreal daily Le Devoir, affirmed the Quebec bishops' view that Quebeckers are a sovereign people. With reference to the Supreme Court's examination of whether Quebec can separate on its own, the Cardinal said:

"The Supreme Court can say what it wants. Even if it says that (Quebeckers) don't have the right to do it, if the people decide to do it, it's the people who are sovereign. I am a democrat."

The Cardinal received hundreds of phone calls and letters. Some people objected to clergymen uttering political opinions. This the Cardinal rejected in a January 7 news conference on the grounds that bishops, too, should facilitate the "climate of exchange." He did apologize, however, for leaving the impression that he was taking sides. This is not so, he said.

Much more importantly, as pointed out on January 9 by William Johnson, long-time student of Quebec affairs and now a columnist for the Sun chain of newspapers - Ottawa, Toronto, Winnipeg, Edmonton and Calgary - the Cardinal, in fact, rejected the rule of law in Canada. Why?

Despite the apologies, in his January 7 televised press conference Cardinal Turcotte reiterated his stance that Quebeckers alone (now only 23% of the Canadian people) have the right to decide what their constitutional future will be.

The idea that Quebeckers are "a distinct people" has been accepted by Quebec bishops for over 30 years. On two occasions, in 1967 and in 1995, the French-speaking bishops also succeeded in getting the national bishops' conference (CCCB), consisting of all the Canadian bishops both French and English, to accept a statement affirming Quebec to be a people with the right of self-determination. But in neither case did English-Canadian Catholics pay much attention. The bishops, too, never looked closely at what is meant by "people," nor at the "how" of self-determination.
COPYRIGHT 1998 Catholic Insight
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Catholic Insight
Date:Mar 1, 1998
Words:345
Previous Article:Fr. (Tissa) Balasuriya's excommunication lifted.
Next Article:Christmas controversy.
Topics:


Related Articles
What "private" morality is doing.
Relief for hurricane victims.
Cardinal Turcotte and confessions (Canada).
Quebec archbishop now a cardinal.
Seminaries and homosexuals.
Claude Ryan, 1925-2004.
Mon oncle Antoine.
Ready for another round? Relatively quiet for almost a decade, the issue of Quebec separatism seems to be bubbling up to the surface again.
Re the "Quebec nineteen" (priests).

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters