Carboniferous auloporids from the Iberian Peninsula: palaeocology, diversity, and spatio-temporal distribution.
Auloporida Sokolov, 1947 is an order of tabulate corals that are very abundant during the Palaeozoic Era. Their distribution ranges from Early Ordovician to Late Permian (Hill, 1981). Auloporids are both primary and secondary builders in the Carboniferous and had an important role along with the algae and others corals in the development of reef limestones (Said et al., 2010; Poty, 2010; Aretz and Herbig, 2010). Wahlman (2002) stated that auloporoids are closely related to chaetetids in his chaetetid-buildups and Minwegen (2001) described the same relationship in the buildups of the Cantabrian Zone, referring to this association as 'chaetetid-coral reef mounds' (Korallen-Chaetetiden-Reefmounds).
Although this group is common in the record, there are few palaeontological studies on Carboniferous auloporids in the Iberian Peninsula. In a general way, this group has been frequently cited, but not described, in palaeontological and geological studies of the Carboniferous of the Iberian Peninsula as auloporid, syringoporid or tabulate corals.
This article represents a compendium of the variety and diversity of Carboniferous auloporid taxa found in the Iberian Peninsula, and the different type of facies and environments in which they grew. The stratigraphic distributions as well as the growth-patterns used by auloporid corals are also objectives of this paper. An exhaustive sampling and identification of the auloporid corals of the Iberian Peninsula in eighteen sections was made to achieve this goal. These sections are spread through the Ossa-Morena (Mississippian) and Cantabrian (Pennsylvanian) zones (Fig. 1) dated as late Visean to early Kasimovian. Additionally, other information obtained from the literature is also included in this work. The criteria used for the identification and characterization of the genera were those proposed by Tchudinova (1980) and are analysed below.
Auloporids have been cited in Mississippian (Ossa-Morena Zone) materials: Cozar et al. (2007), and Cozar and Rodriguez (1999) cited the presence of tabulate corals in reference to Auloporida in Penarroya-2 section, Cordoba (Spain). Cozar and Rodriguez (2000), Cozar and Rodriguez (2001) and Rodriguez and Rodriguez-Curt (2002) cited the occurrence of tabulate corals in reference to Auloporida in Antolin-1 section, Antolin- 3 section and Sierra Boyera section, Cordoba (Spain). Cozar et al. (2007) described the Fuenteobejuna section and found abundant tabulate corals which correspond with Auloporida in Cordoba (Spain). Rodriguez et al. (1992) and Rodriguez (1996) identified Syringopora, Pleurosyphonella and other tabulate corals in the Cerro de los Santos, Cerro Almena and El Torreon sections from the Carboniferous Basin of Los Santos de Maimona, Badajoz (Spain).
Cozar and Rodriguez (2001) found tabulate corals in the Camino del Aguila section, which correspond with remains of Auloporida. Gomez-Herguedas and Rodriguez (2008) found tabulate corals that were identify as syringoporids and/ or auloporids in the La Cornuda section, Cordoba (Spain).
Within the Betic Cordillera, auloporid corals were cited by Herbig (1984) in the Marbella Conglomerates, which are a subunit of the Malaguide Complex, Malaga (Spain). The auloporids occur within post-Visean carbonate pebbles.
Numerous outcrops yielded auloporoids in the Pennsylvanian (Cantabrian-Zone).Winkler Prins (1971) described the type section of the Valdeteja Formation, in the Barcaliente Valley, Leon (Spain) and found some tabulate corals, citing Cladochonus sp. and Paleofavosites sp. Later Eichmuller (1985) described additional sections of the Valdeteja Formation and found numerous samples of a syringoporid coral that was classified as Sinopora. Recently, Villa et al. (2001) analyzed the biostratigraphic sequence of this section and described some facies containing auloporid corals.
van de Graaff (1971a) cited small colonies of auloporid corals in growth-position related to chaetetids in the Piedrasluengas Limestone, Palencia (Spain).
van Loon (1971) mentioned syringoporoid corals together with other fossil remains in the Pando Limestone section, at the Pando Pass and in the road to Prioro, Leon (Spain). Later, Fernandez and Barba (1992) identified auloporoid corals in the Pando Pass.
The only taxonomical study on auloporids in the Spanish record was presented by Rodriguez and Ramirez (1987). These authors described the taxonomical characteristics of two genera and three new species of auloporids that occur in the La Playa de la Huelga section, Asturias (Spain) and interpreted the environments of growth. Later, this section was studied by Minwegen (2001), who identified the same genera. Similarly, the transect of San Antolin-La Huelga was described by Bahamonde et al. (2008), who also recognized syringoporid corals.
Minwegen (2001) studied the microfabrics and building organisms dominant during the Carboniferous in several sections of the Cantabrian Zone as indicated above. This author recognized auloporid corals associated with chaetetids in the Villanueva section, Asturias (Spain). Likewise she recognized syringoporoids in the Piedrasluengas limestone as well as Neomultithecopora in the Fuente De section, Cantabria (Spain).
The Fuente De section (sensu Minwegen, 2001) was also studied by Martinez-Chacon et al. (2001) and Merino-Tome et al. (2009), who identified the genus Neomultithecopora, forming small buildups associated with chaetetids, in Cantabria (Spain).
Rodriguez et al. (1997) identified some taxa of rugose corals in a section near Ribadesella town, Asturias (Spain), where numerous incrustations of auloporid corals occur on the rugose coral skeletons.
Coronado and Rodriguez (2009) recognized syringoporoid corals in the algal-mounds of Cosgaya Formation in Cantabria (Spain) where they occur associated with calcareous algae, chaetetids and rugose corals.
Corrochano et al., (in press) found syringoporid corals in the Lena Group within the Levinco Formation, Leon (Spain) and Corrochano et al. (2009) identified syringoporid corals in the Bachende Limestone in Leon (Spain) also included in the Lena Group.
2. Geological settings
The outcrops sampled belong to the Carboniferous rocks of the Iberian Peninsula (Fig. 1). These materials crop out mainly in the Iberian Massif (Lotze, 1945; Julivert, 1971), which occupies almost half of the Iberian Peninsula and corresponds with the European zone of the Variscan Belt. There are additionally a number of smaller Carboniferous outcrops, separated by a Mesozoic and Cenozoic cover, exposed in the Iberian Range, Pyrenees, Catalonian Coastal Ranges, Minorca and Betic Cordillera (Colmenero et al., 2002). See figures 2 and 3 for the location of the eighteen studied and sampled sections in the Ossa-Morena and Cantabrian Zones of the Iberian Massif.
2.1. Ossa-Morena Zone
The Ossa-Morena Zone is located in the southwestern part of the Iberian Massif, and contains two marine Mississippian basins: the Guadiato Area and the Los Santos de Maimona Coal Basin (Wagner, 2004). Nine sections have been sampled in both basins.
The Guadiato Area is situated in Cordoba province and is a large and complex area in SW Spain (Fig. 2) that comprises Mississippian siliciclastic and limestone rocks. It is divided into three bands (Cozar and Rodriguez, 1999): 1) Fresnedoso Unit, composed mainly of Visean siliciclastic rocks, 2) San Antonio-La Juliana Unit, composed of Serpukhovian siliciclastic and limestone rocks, and 3) Sierra del Castillo Unit, composed mainly of Visean limestone rocks. Most palaeontological and stratigraphical studies were focused on the Visean units. This is especially marked for studies on rugose corals, (Rodriguez 1985; Rodriguez and Falces, 1996; Rodriguez et al., 2001; Rodriguez and Somerville, 2007; Gomez-Herguedas and Rodriguez, 2008).
Seven sections have been sampled in the Guadiato Area (Cordoba province): La Adelfilla, Sierra de la Estrella, El Collado, Antolin, Fuenteobejuna, San Antonio and La Cornuda (Fig. 2).
Only two sections (Los Santos de Maimona and Cerro Almena) have been sampled in Los Santos de Maimona Coal Basin that is located in the Badajoz province, between the towns of Los Santos de Maimona, Fuente del Maestre, and Feria. The Carboniferous outcrops form a narrow strip 11 km SENW and a width of 1 to 3 km, NE-SW (Fig. 2) and is formed by siliciclastic and carbonate materials, and small volcanic bodies, with a Mississippian age (Rodriguez et al., 1992).
2.2. Cantabrian Zone
The Cantabrian Zone is the most northern part of the Iberian Massif (Lotze, 1945), located in the north-west of the Iberian Peninsula. In this area, five zones can be distinguished from a structural point of view, with boundaries set by major thrusts. These are, from west to east: Fold-and-Thrust region (Somiedo-Correcillas, Sobia-Bodon and Aramo units), Central Carboniferous Coal Basin, Thrust Region (Ponga Unit), Picos de Europa Unit, and Pisuerga-Carrion Unit (Fig. 3). Overall, they show a vergence towards the east or the north, with the western units overthrusting the eastern ones. The Pisuerga-Carrion Region or Unit, in the innermost part, is overthrusted by all the surrounding units.
Nine sections have been sampled in different units of the Cantabrian Zone (Fig. 3): Manto del Esla (Prioro section, Leon province); Manto del Ponga (Ribadesella and Playa de la Huelga sections, Asturias province); Sobia-Bodon (Valdeteja section and Las Majadas section, Leon province); Pisuerga-Carrion (Las Ilces section in Cantabria province, Piedrasluengas, Este de Camasobres, Celada de Roblecedo Sur and Pico Guillermo sections in Palencia province).
3. Material of study and methods
Eighteen sections have been sampled searching for auloporid corals. The sampling consisted in the collection of complete colonies, fragments of colonies or fragments of corallites in facies associated with buildups in all of the sections, except in Ribadesella. Ten solitary rugose corals were sampled in this section, because auloporid corals only occur encrusting the rugosans.
520 thin-sections of auloporid corals have been prepared to study the inner characters. The specimens from Ribadesella were partly covered with marls and clays. For this reason, ten corals were cleaned with an 8% sodium hexametaphosphate solution during 18 hours to remove the sediment. Later, three thin-sections were made, two of them to observe the inner characters. In addition, some colonies have been cut and polished to observe the growth stages of the colonies.
Likewise, additional occurrences of auloporids have been identified with references in the literature (Minwegen, 2001; Merino Tome et al., 2009).
The sections mentioned in this chapter have been described in detail in previous papers. Consequently, we will not describe them in detail, but will provide short reports on their most representative lithologies and palaeontological content. Temporal distributions of sections are displayed in Fig. 4.
La Adelfilla, Fuenteobejuna and San Antonio. (San Antonio-La Juliana Unit). Described and figured by Cozar et al. (2007) and Cozar and Rodriguez (2004).These localities correspond to Visean olistoliths in Serpukhovian olistostromes. La Adelfilla shows several imbricated olistoliths. Its thickness is about 40 m thick. It consists of bioclastic massive limestones, brecciated limestones and oolitic limestones. The section has been dated from the microfauna as late Visean (Brigantian). The Fuenteobejuna section is 140 m thick, mostly composed of limestones, shales and polymictic breccias in the upper part. The section has been dated from microfauna and the microflora as late Visean (late Asbian to early Brigantian). San Antonio section consists of limestones interbedded with shales and marls. The limestones are wackestones and grainstones. The section has been dated from the foraminiferal assemblage as early Serpukhovian (Pendelian). The facies that yielded corals are bioclastic limestones that are irregularly distributed in the olistoliths. They are coarse grained and corals are related to a diverse assemblage of invertebrates and algae. The original environment for those sections was open marine, shallow, agitated water (Cozar and Rodriguez, 1999).
Sierra de la Estrella. (Sierra del Castillo Unit). Described and figured by Cozar et al. (2003). It consists of a 234 m thick succession of bioclastic and massive limestones with interbedded marls. The auloporids from Sierra de la Estrella occur in well-bedded biostromal limestones at the top of microbial mounds. They represent the capping beds of the mounds, when they reached shallow waters. The section has been dated from foraminiferal assemblage as Zone 15 of Mamet, 1974 (middle part of the late Visean, Asbian).
El Collado. (Sierra del Castillo Unit). Described and figured by Cozar (2004). This section comprises more than 150 metres of cyclic sedimentation of limestones and marls, in a shallow-water platform. The section has been dated from the foraminiferal assemblage as late Visean (Asbian-Brigantian). The beds containing auloporids correspond to storm beds that reworked a rich assemblage dominated by colonial rugose corals.
Antolin. (Sierra del Castillo Unit). Described and figured by Cozar and Rodriguez (2000).This section comprises limestone debris 15 m thick in a mainly siliciclastic rhythmic sedimentation. It is typical from proximal turbidites. This section has been dated as late Visean (Asbian-Brigantian). The reworked limestones originated in patch reefs located in the border of the talus (Rodriguez and Rodriguez-Curt, 2002).
La Cornuda. (San Antonio-La Juliana Unit). Described and figured by Gomez-Herguedas and Rodriguez (2008). This section is the only Serpukhovian autochthonous outcrop that yielded auloporids in Sierra Morena. It consists of limestones, calcareous sandstones and conglomerates 500 m thick. The section has been dated from foraminiferal assemblage as early Serpukhovian zones 17 and 18 (Pendleian). Auloporids encrusted rugose corals in shallow-water, coral-algal-microbial mounds (Gomez-Herguedas and Rodriguez, 2008).
Los Santos de Maimona. (Los Santos de Maimona Coal Basin). Described and figured by Rodriguez et al. (1992). Consist of 35 m of marls, limestones and marly limestones. The section has been dated as late Visean, zone 15 (Asbian). Auloporoids in Los Santos occur in well-bedded biostromal limestones that have been regarded as a reef-flat (Rodriguez, 1996). They are one of the main building organisms together with gigantoproductid brachiopods and rugose corals.
Cerro Almena. (Los Santos de Maimona Coal Basin). Described and figured by Rodriguez et al. (1992). It consists of 90 m of alternating limestones, marly limestones and shales. This section has been dated as late Visean, Zone 15 and 16 (Asbian-Brigantian subtage). Well-bedded to massive bioclastic limestones contain common reworked fragments of auloporoids and some entire colonies at the top of the beds. They lived in calcareous shoals and are accompanied by a diverse assemblage containing different invertebrates, foraminifers and algae.
Valdeteja and Las Majadas (Valdeteja Formation, Sobia-Bodon Unit). Calcareous succession up to 700 m thick cropping out in the Somiedo-Correcillas, Sobia-Bodon, northern part of the Central Asturian Coalfield, Ponga Nappe, and Picos de Europa structural units of the Cantabrian Zone. The Valdeteja Formation was first described by Winkler Prins (1971), who identified the auloporid genus Cladochonus. Eichmuller (1985) described different sections and outcrops of Valdeteja Formation and identified mounds built by calcareous algae and reef mounds containing the auloporoid coral Sinopora sp.
The Valdeteja Formation has been dated as early Bashkirian-early Moscovian (Villa et al, 2001).
Las Ilces (Cosgaya Formation, Pisuerga-Carrion Unit). Described and figured by Coronado and Rodriguez (2009). It consists of a calcareous section 35 m thick, composed of limestones, which occasionally alternate black shales and marls. The Cosgaya Formation is composed of bioclastic limestones that show abundant algae and corals and locally form mounds (bioherms?). Those mounds are conspicuous at Las Ilces Section. Auloporoids are common in the mounds and in the surrounding facies. The age of the sections was established by fusulinids as late Bashkirian (Coronado, 2008).
Piedrasluengas (Piedrasluengas Formation, Pisuerga-Carrion Unit). This section comprises 300 m of limestones and marls. The Piedrasluengas Limestone, as was first defined by van de Graaff (1971a), has a early Moscovian age (Vereiskian-Kashirskian), and provides a facies model for most of the Carboniferous limestones in the Cantabrian Mountains. A boundstone of auloporoids and chaetetids has been identified in the level 16 of van de Graaff (1971a), which Mingewen (2001) denominated as a biostrome of chaetetids with syringoporids and rugose corals and which was sampled for this study.
Ribadesella section (Calizas del Cuera Formation, Picos de Europa Unit). This section was first described by Rodriguez et al. (1997) and Fernandez (1995). In this quarry subhorizontal marls and limestones crop out. The section begins with 8-10 m of silty limestones and marls containing common dissepimented solitary and colonial Rugosa and chaetetids, and scarce auloporids. This interval is overlain by 10-12 m of massive well-bedded limestone containing less abundant corals, which extends to the top of the quarry. Chaetetids are usually represented by large colonies encrusting brachiopods, rugose corals and tabulate corals. Most of them show a subspherical shape. Auloporids were less abundant and usually grew on lateral surfaces of large solitary corals whereas the rugose corals are very abundant and show little or no transportation. The presence of fusulinids in these beds establishes an Early Moscovian age (Rodriguez et al., 1997).
The Vergano Formation (Pisuerga Carrion Unit) was defined by van de Graaff (1971b) as having a lower part of cross-stratified sandstones--shales with thin interbedded layers of mudstone and sandstone, limestones, and a turbidite bed. Three members of limestone can be recognized in this formation, Socavon Limestone (Podolskian), Cotarraso Limestone (Podolskian-Myachkovian) and the Sierra Corisa Limestone member (Myachkovian). These limestone members form three superstructures denominated as the Casavegas Syncline, Redondo Syncline and Castilleria Syncline (Wagner et al., 1983; Wagner 2009).
van de Graaff (1971b) described the facies from the Vergano Formation and mentioned the presence of auloporid corals in the limestones facies from Pico Guillermo, Pena Abismo, Cabramocha, Vergano, Celada de Roblecedo, Tremaya, Casavegas, Pena Tres Mares, and Pena Agujas sections.
Three sections were sampled from this study: Celada de Roblecedo Sur, Pico Guillermo and Este de Camasobres.
Celada de Roblecedo Sur: This section is located in the Celada de Roblecedo Anticline between the Redondo Syncline and the Castilleria Syncline. It is Late Moscovian (Myachkovian horizon) in age.
Este de Camasobres: Located in the Casavegas Syncline and corresponds with a small section described by Boll (1985) where abundant rugose corals occur with auloporids and chaetetids. It is Middle Moscovian (Kashirian-early Podolskian horizons) in age.
Pico Guillermo: Located in the Redondo Syncline. It is a large calcareous olistolith that was described by van de Graaff (1971b) and contains small colonies of auloporid corals in growth position. It is Middle Moscovian (Kashirianearly Podolskian) in age.
Prioro limestones (Pando Formation, Esla Nape): The synorogenic sediments of the Esla Nappe form a succession that exceeds 5 km in thickness in some sectors of the nappe, but generally presents strong changes of thickness, some discordances and lateral changes of facies, as a consequence of the synsedimentary tectonic activity (Alonso, 1989). In the first stage (Bashkirian-Moscovian) the succession has a marine character with deposits of talus (turbidites, olistostromes, shales with pebbles, etc). In this succession, a carbonate lithosome denominated as the Mesao Limestone (van Loon, 1971) is conspicuous. It consists of an alternation of limestones and calcareous mudstones. Bioclastic limestones occur as well as biogenic banks. The biogenic banks are mainly constructed by algae, but corals, brachiopods, crinoids, and fusulinids are almost always present. The bioclastic limestones consist mainly of transported crinoidal fragments, but brachiopods, corals, fusulinids, and even plant remains occur as well. These materials were dated as from fusulinid assemblage as Westphalian C (early Podolskian) by van Loon (1971).
The biogenic banks have been sampled for this study both in the south flank and in the north flank of the Pando Syncline where the thickness of the limestones is much greater.
Playa de la Huelga (Calizas del Cuera, Picos de Europa Unit): This section is exposed along the cliffs of eastern Asturias from San Antolin Beach to the village of Hontoria. Villa (1995) dated the levels sampled in this work as early Podolskian - late Myachkovian. Rodriguez (1984) studied the coral faunas, mainly focused in the Rugosa specimens. In a later taxonomical study focused in tabulates, Rodriguez and Ramirez (1987) described three new taxa that occur in the Playa de la Huelga section. Two cerioid-phaceloid forms assigned to Neomultithecopora cantabrica and N. submassiva, and a phaceloid-bushy form denominated as Multithecopora hontoriense. The Pennsylvanian materials that provided the subject of the study (interval of latest Podolskian or earliest Myachkovian age) are composed of ca. 100 m of massive bioclastic limestones, which present interbedded marls and shales and occasionally sandstones. Minwegen (2001), described the microfacies and bioconstructions found in Playa de la Huelga section (Hontoria I sensu Minwegen, 2001). She described the bioconstruted facies as reef-mound facies. These beds are dominated by syringoporoid masses in growth position, associated with bryozoa, abundant brachiopods, calcareous algae, chaetetids, and rugose corals.
In addition, syringoporoids cited and figured in the Picos de Europa Unit, at Morra de Lechugales section in Cantabria province (Minwegen, 2001; Martinez-Chacon et al., 2001; Merino-Tome et al, 2009) have been also identified from the bibliography. The specimens sampled in the Cantabrian zone range from early Bashkirian to late Moscovian in age. The inclusion of the Morra de Lechugales section extends the record to early Kasimovian.
4.2. Introduction to Auloporida
Two superfamilies were identified in the record for Auloporida Sokolov, 1947 order; Auloporicae Milne-Edwards and Haime, 1851 and Syringoporicae de Fromentel, 1861; twenty families were recognized, of which twelve have been recorded in the Carboniferous period: Auloporidae Milne-Edwards and Haime, 1851; Pyrgiidae, de Fromentel, 1861; Romingeriidae, Sokolov, 1950; Aulocystidae, Sokolov, 1950; Sinoporidae, Sokolov, 1955; ?Khmeriidae, Montanaro-Gallitelli, 1954; Syringoporidae, de Fromentel, 1861; Tetraporellidae, Sokolov, 1950; Multithecoporidae, Sokolov, 1950; Roemeriidae, Poeta, 1904; Thecostegitidae, de Fromentel, 1861 and Gorskyitidae Lin, 1963.
Auloporida formed arbustive or fruticose colonies with proximal corallites commonly prostrate or adherent to other biogenic or inorganic remains; may have erect corallites (fasciculate) or branched (dendroid) and more rarely cerioid. They show diverse forms: tubular, horned, cylindrical or prismatic. This order could show mural pores or connecting tubuli (e.g. Syringoporicae); the septa are represented by longitudinal rows of commonly fine spines, and the tabula are very sparse or even absent to numerous, complete or incomplete, with a syrinx in most Syringoporicae. The increase is lateral and commonly basal (cf. Hill, 1981).
4.3. Systematics and classification
There are no useful common criteria to establish the main features for the auloporid taxonomy to different levels. Those features depend on the subjectivity of the author and the superfamily involved. In Auloporicae the most commonly used criterion is the general morphology, the growth habit and, to a lesser degree, the presence and morphology of tabulae and septal spines. In Syringoporicae, more diverse criteria have been used. Nelson (1977) used four parameters in the taxonomy of syringoporid corals; two of which are the corallite diameter and the frequency of corallites (number of corallites that occur within a certain area). This author suggests that these parameters are very important in defining species and that both are, more or less, independent of the environment. Nelson (1977) suggests also two other parameters, the type of tabular pattern and the wall thickness, which are significant in defining genera. Other authors, such as Nowinski (1991) and Niko (1998), have employed the frequency or distance between corallites. Tchudinova (1975), Sando (1984) and Nowinski (1991) used not only the corallite diameter and the distance between corallites, but also the wall thickness, diameter of connecting tubes, distance between connecting tubes, distance between tabulae, diameter of axial canal or lumen and the amount of septal spines. These additional characters also were used by Rodriguez and Ramirez (1987) along with the diameter of corallite and thickness. These criteria could be used in those genera that present abundant tabulae and connecting structures, but cannot be used as a systematic feature in all auloporid genera.
Tchudinova (1980) presented a study on the morphogenesis of Syringoporidae, which shows a series of characters that occur in different genera through time. These are: microstructure of corallite wall, presence of lamellar or fibrous sclerenchyme and presence of septal spines, connecting elements and tabulae.
In this study we follow the taxonomical characters proposed by Tchudinova (1980): microstructure, septal spines, and tabulae, together with the corallite diameter, lumen diameter, and their relationship (diameter/lumen), which helps in the identification of some genera such as Multithecopora and Sinopora. The frequency or space between corallites, as suggested by Nelson (1977), is an acceptable criterion for use in Syringoporidae, but not in Multithecoporidae and Sinoporidae, because these families show plasticity in growth and the substrate and environment control the growth of the colonies. The morphology of the colony and the morphology of the corallite only have been considered for the Auloporicae taxa. The kind of septal spines used by Tchudinova (1980) are also used in Scleractinian corals and compiled by Hill (1981). However, in our opinion, this criterion could cause some problems in the classification of tabulate corals. For this reason, we use quantitative criteria (abundant, common or scarce), distribution (sparse, in rows or random) and form (acute or blunt) to describe the septal spines. Occasionally, septal spines are very scarce or absent, but the wall presents undulations in the sclerenchyma as septal projections.
Sando (1984) undertook a biostratigraphic study on syringoporid corals from the Western Interior Region, USA and he grouped all the syringoporoids in morphogroups. In the absence of previous taxonomical studies, this methodology has been used in this study, subdividing the genera into morphotypes. Due to the plastic morphology and growth habit of auloporidae, these morphotypes may be species or subspecies (ecophenotypes) or groups of species, and need to be analyzed deeper in the future.
The Carboniferous auloporids of the Iberian Peninsula include nine nominal genera and have been divided into 18 morphotypes and two species, which are based on the morphologic criteria documented above (Table 1).
4.3.1. Mississippian taxa
The Mississippian samples have been located in the Ossa-Morena Zone, and five genera have been identified: Multithecopora Yoh, 1927; Syringopora Goldfuss, 1826; Syringoalcyon Termier and Termier, 1945; Cladochonus McCoy, 1847 and Roemeripora Kraicz, 1934. Table 1 shows the main taxonomical characters of each genus identified.
Multithecopora is the most frequent genus in the Iberian Peninsula. We have identified four morphotypes in the Ossa-Morena Zone: Multithecopora sp. A, sp. B, sp. C and sp. H.
Multithecopora sp. A shows a larger size than the other Mississippian morphotypes of Multithecopora (avg. 1.96 mm -range 1.47-2.85 mm in diameter; Table 1) and presents well developed septal spines, which show acute morphology (Fig. 5). This morphotype is present in five sections of the Ossa-Morena Zone (Antolin-1, Sierra de la Estrella, Fuenteobejuna, Los Santos de Maimona and El Collado sections) ranging in age from middle-late Asbian to early Brigantian.
Multithecopora sp. B is quite similar to Multithecopora sp. A, but differs in the diameter (1.06 mm versus 1.96 mm). This morphotype occurs in the Antolin-1 and Fuenteobejuna sections and has a early-middle Brigantian distribution (Fig.6A-B).
Multithecopora sp. C shows a more bushy growth than the previous morphotypes, forms better developed colonies, and the corallites present less septal spines (Fig. 6C-D). This morphotype occurs in the early Brigantian from El Collado (zone 16 of Mamet, 1974). Multithecopora sp. A, B and C occur only in the Visean.
Multithecopora sp. H shows a phaceloid growth habit and encrusting on rugose corals. Their characteristics are common in Multithecopora genera: the diameter/lumen rate and the dimensions, the presence of septal spines, and a colonial development forming small bushy colonies (Fig. 6E-F). This morphotype is known only from the Serpukhovian (Pendleian Stage, Table 2).
Another significant genus in the Visean recorded from the Ossa-Morena Zone is Syringopora. Two morphotypes have been recognized: Syringopora sp. A and Syringopora sp. B. Both morphotypes show the main characteristics of Syringopora. The differences between them are that Syringopora sp. B is larger than Syringopora sp. A, and has a higher lumen diameter. Syringopora sp. B shows a fasciculate development, with less density of corallites and branched colonies (Fig. 7A-D). Syringopora sp. A shows a palisade development with a high density of corallites (Fig. 7E-F). The morphology of the corallites of Syringopora sp. A is more irregular than that of the morphotype B, which present a more cylindrical development. Syringopora sp. A occurs only in the Los Santos de Maimona Basin and in Los Santos and Cerro Almena sections of late Visean (middle-late Asbian) age. Whereas Syringopora sp. B occurs in the Guadiato Area, and more specifically in the Antolin and La Adelfilla sections and is of late Visean (early Brigantian) age.
Syringoalcyon is another common genus in Ossa-Morena. It has been recorded in the Los Santos de Maimona and Cerro Almena sections with a distribution of Asbian-Brigantian. This genus presents distinctive epithecal scales and shows characteristics very similar to Syringopora (Fig. 7G-I). For this reason some authors such as Hill (1981) and Tourneur et al. (1995) identified it with Syringopora. Its distribution is middle Asbian. The epithecal scales of the samples of Los Santos de Maimona Coal Basin do not show a dense packing and are thinner than those described in the literature.
Roemeripora sp. occurs only in the Fuenteobejuna section as massive cerioid colonies, where the corallites show a dense packing with prismatic and irregular forms, with abundant septal spines and connecting tubuli (Fig. 8E-F). It occurs from late Asbian to early Brigantian (Cozar et al., 2007).
Cladochonus sp. A is one of the two morphotypes (A and B) that occurs in the Iberian Peninsula. It shows an initial tubular development with a secondary globular enlargement and "diaphragms" between corallites as well as the lack of tabulae and spines (Fig. 9C-D). This morphotype occurs in the lower levels of the El Collado section, which is uppermost Asbian in age (Zone 15 of Mamet, 1974 biostratigraphy).
4.3.2. Pennsylvanian taxa
On the other hand, the Pennsylvanian samples collected in the Cantabrian Zone yielded six nominal genera: Multithecopora Yoh, 1927; Neomultithecopora Lin, 1963; Sinopora Sokolov, 1955; Cladochonus McCoy, 1847, Aulopora Goldfuss, 1829 and Mastopora? Sokolov, 1952. Table 1 shows the main taxonomical characters of each genus identified in this zone.
Four morphotypes and one nominal species of Multithecopora have been recognized in the Cantabrian Zone: Multithecopora sp. D, Multithecopora sp. E, Multithecopora sp. F, Multithecopora sp. G, and Multithecopora hontoriense Rodriguez and Ramirez, 1987.
Multithecopora sp. D shows phaceloid colonies composed of small corallites that show septal projections and have a well-developed inner fibrous domain or an alternation of fibrous and lamellar domains. The growth pattern is prostrate in early stages, but later the corallites develop an erect growth, with subsequent budding in some cases (Fig. 10AB). This morphotype occurs in the Valdeteja section at higher levels than the "Cladochonus band" of Winkler Prins (1971), which could occur from early Bashkirian? to early Moscovian rocks (Villa et al., 2001), but it is more probable that it occurs in a middle Bashkirian to early Moscovian (Tashatinian -Vereian) horizon.
Multithecopora sp. E shows diameter and septal projections similar to the previous morphotype but presents some differences, such as the microstructure (only three domains, mainly lamellar), and the growth habit (phaceloid and bushy). This morphotype grows encrusting other organisms, such as rugose corals or Chaetetes. The corallite length is very short, showing an open calyx almost from the beginning of the offsetting (Fig. 10C-F). This morphotype occurs in two sections in the Cantabrian Zone; in the Las Ilces section, middle Bashkirian in age (Tashatinian horizon, Coronado, 2008) and in the Piedrasluengas section, early Moscovian in age (Vereian horizon, van der Graaff, 1971a).
Multithecopora sp. F is similar to the previous morphotype; the differences are in the growth habit; this morphotype is reptant or rarely bushy, shows a smaller diameter and smaller septal protrusions (Fig. 11A-B). This morphotype only occurs in the Este de Camasobres section that is late Moscovian in age (Kashirian horizon, van der Graaff (1971b), Westphalian C sensu Boll, 1985).
Multithecopora sp. G shows a bushy development of the colonies and a smaller diameter than previous morphotypes. This morphotype presents scarce septal spines that are small and short (Fig. 11C-D). The colonies are composed of many corallites and grew encrusting on chaetetids and other bioclasts. This morphotype only occurs in the Prioro section that is late Moscovian in age (Podolskian--early Myachkovian).
Multithecopora hontoriense presents a larger diameter than other Multithecopora of the Cantabrian Zone; they built erect, densely packed or branching, bushy colonies (Fig. 12A-H). The corallites show scarce septal spines but frequent septal projections that offer an undulating microstructure. This morphotype presents fibrous inner and outer layers and, sometimes, a thin fibrous middle layer. It is present in two sections of the late Moscovian. It occurs in the Pico Guillermo section that is Kashirian-Podolskian in age and in the Playa de la Huelga section that is Podolskian-Myachkovian in age.
The taxon Neomultithecopora cantabrica shows phaceloid to submassive colonies with lateral increase. The corallites show circular to prismatic sections, sometimes sharing the wall with neighbouring corallites (Fig. 8A-D). This taxon shows a thick wall with abundant septal spines and frequently connecting tubuli. The tabulae are variable in shape (curved, horizontal or infundibuliform). This genus is similar to Multithecopora in the structure of the wall. It shows alternating fibrous and lamellar layers with higher development of the lamellar layers. This species occurs in two sections, in the Playa de la Huelga, where it occurs associated with chaetetids and rugose corals and in the Prioro section, where it appears associated with chaetetids and Multithecopora sp. G and has an late Moscovian (Podolskian-Myachkovian) age.
Sinopora also occurs in the Celada de Roblecedo section and shows a bushy colonial morphology with cylindrical corallites similar to Multithecopora, but with deeper calices and absent septal spines. The tabulae are rare (scarce or absent) and concave (Fig. 11E-F). The age of this morphotype is late Moscovian (Myachkovian).
Cladochonus sp. B occurs in the Valdeteja section. This morphotype presents the classical features of this genus, as compiled by Hill (1981) and later Stasinska (1982): coral prostrate, which in distal parts presents erect branches that seem forked, with a characteristic growth in zigzag, inner "diaphragms" between corallites as well as the lack of the septal apparatus, and scarce curved tabulae (Fig. 9A-B). The level of Cladochonus is early Bashkirian in age (Akavasian horizon, Villa et al., 2001).
Aulopora is represented by two morphotypes (Aulopora sp.A, sp. B), which occur in the same locality (Ribadesella section, early Moscovian, Vereyian horizon). Both Aulopora morphotypes show adherent colonies with cornute corallites joined in anastomosing chains; the calices show a conical shape, basal-lateral increase, and moderately thick walls (Fig. 13).
Aulopora sp. A shows a thick wall similar to Multithecoporidae, but it does not show septal spines and the microstructure is poorly preserved. However, a fibrous domain and an inner and thicker homogeneous lamellar domain are distinguished (Fig. 13A-B). The tabulae are curved (concave and convex) and frequent.
Aulopora sp. B shows a more open calyx lumen and thinner wall than Aulopora sp. A. Septal spines are absent and tabulae are infundibuliform as in Syringopora. The microstructure is composed of an outer fibrous layer more developed than that in Aulopora sp. A (Fig. 13C-F).
Two colonies ofMastopora? sp. show reptant and densely packed colonies, which form continuous encrusting sheets. Occasionally, it may form a globular shape, when the successive sheets are joined. Although the collected samples do not display the typical mammilliform shape of Mastopora corallites, the growth habit and the presence of sheet-like structures point to this genus. Two colonies have been sampled in the Playa de la Huelga section. The calices are raised and present a small aperture and thick walls, but the relationship (diameter/lumen) is low, because the lumen is usually open (Fig. 9E-F). This morphotype shows scarce, small septal spines, and acute shape and thick concave tabulae. These morphologic criteria suggest that this morphotype belongs to Mastopora. The genus Mastopora has been found previously only in the Silurian and Devonian, but as the section Playa de la Huelga has been dated as upper Moscovian (Podolskian) we use this genus with question mark.
4.4. Microfacies andpalaeoecological characteristics
The sections sampled offer a large variety of environments, microfacies, and associations where the Carboniferous auloporids from the Iberian Peninsula could grow. Table 2 shows a compendium of data of the different microfacies found in studied samples (section, microfacies, geometry and lithology of the beds, components, depositional environment and characteristics derived from the study of the other components, fabrics, morphotypes, and age).
These data show that the dominant microfacies are coral or chaetetid boundstone (sensu Dunham, 1962). The bioclastic microfacies (e.g. bioclastic wackestone, packstone or grainstone) are common too, and they formed in a large variety of environments (flanks of buildups, shallow tidal flats or storm beds in inner or medial carbonate platforms).
The predominant host rock in these sections is massive limestone, occasionally with domical shape. Marls and silty limestones are subordinate in some sections. The most common occurrence of auloporoids is in the core of reef mounds, patch-reef and reef systems. Auloporids also occur in the capping beds of microbial mounds. The bedded limestones instead, are associated with bioclastic microfacies dependent on energetic environments, such as talus facies or storm beds.
The fossil assemblages related to the Auloporida in the Iberian Peninsula are dominated by the presence of crinoids, calcareous algae, chaetetids and other corals. It suggests that those communities are developed in shallow to moderately deep seas that present well-oxygenated and marine normal salinities.
5. Results and Discussion
The Carboniferous Auloporida from the Iberian Peninsula occurs in a large variety of environments and they were related to a wide spectrum of other invertebrate groups (Table 2).
The oldest occurrences are recorded in the upper Visean (Middle Mississippian) in the Los Santos de Maimona and Cerro Almena sections. Auloporids occur there in two different environments: reef flat and shallow-water platform. The Auloporids related to reef-flat platforms (Rodriguez et al., 1992; Rodriguez, 1996) show a diverse assemblage dominated by gigantoproductid brachiopods that are the base for the attachment of rugose corals and auloporids (Syringoporidae are the dominant auloporids). Well-preserved build-up beds alternate with storm beds where corals and brachiopods are reworked. Auloporids occur in growth position at the top of some beds developed in a shallow-water platform (above the wave-base) from Cerro Almena. Fragments of the same corals occur in the middle part of the beds.
Auloporoids occur in more diverse environments, with Multithecoporidae the dominant auloporids in the Visean from the Guadiato Basin. They lived at the top of microbial mounds (Sierra de la Estrella Section, Rodriguez-Martinez et al., 2003), in patch reefs (Antolin Section, Rodriguez and Rodriguez-Curt, 2002), and in shallow-water platforms affected by storms (El Collado Section; Fuenteobejuna Section, Cozar et al., 2007; and Adelfilla Section). In all cases they are associated with diverse assemblages that include rugose corals, chaetetids, brachiopods, crinoids, bryozoans, algae, cyanobacteria and foraminifers.
The Serpukhovian rocks from the Guadiato Basin yielded a poor assemblage of auloporoids (San Antonio and La Cornuda sections, Gomez-Herguedas and Rodriguez, 2008) that lived in small mud mounds mainly composed of algae, rugose corals, chaetetids and peloidal wackestone produced by microbial communities.
During the Pennsylvanian there is a change in the benthic communities, but the Multithecoporidae were still present and became dominant components in many environments. Consequently, they occur in many Pennsylvanian localities from the Cantabrian Zone.
Auloporids occur in the Bashkirian and Moscovian, being a main or a secondary component of reef mounds built by them, associated with calcareous algae (Donezella, Anthracoporella and/or phylloid algae), as well as rugose corals, chaetetids and microbial communities (Las Ilces Section, Coronado and Rodriguez, 2009; Prioro section, van Loon, 1971; Celada de Roblecedo and Pico Guillermo sections (van der Graaff, 1971b). As in the Mississippian, they also occur at the top of microbial and algal mounds and in surrounding facies (Valdeteja Section, Eichmuller, 1985). Auloporoids are also common in shallow-water platforms. They built biostromes associated with rugose corals and chaetetids (Piedras Luengas Section, Minwegen, 2001) and built reefal structures associated also with rugose corals and chaetetids (Playa de la Huelga Section, Minwegen 2001; Bahamonde, 2008). Occasionally, they occur in shallow-water platforms with soft bottom, growing on rugose corals or brachiopods (Playa de la Huelga, Rodriguez and Ramirez, 1987; Ribadesella, Rodriguez et al., 1997 and Este de Camasobres sections).
Most of the Auloporida that are found in these environments belong to the superfamily Syringoporicae, which show phaceloid and more rarely cerioid morphology, with a diverse density of occurrence and growth-directions of corallites. The growth strategies of tabulate corals were analyzed by Scrutton (1997). They depend on the strength of substrate, the competitiveness with other organisms and the environmental conditions during the colony development. The Syringoporicae of the Iberian Peninsula show diverse strategies:
Syringopora and Syringoalcyon in Los Santos de Maimona and Cerro Almena Sections show phaceloid (palisade) colonies with the main development in the periphery (Fig. 7 E-I). This strategy is possible because of the presence of hard substrate such as brachiopod shells or rugose corals and protection against high energy of the waves. The vertical growth is unlimited in Cerro Almena, but limited by the level of low tides in Los Santos de Maimona.
Multithecopora hontoriense from Playa de la Huelga and Pico Guillermo sections shows a similar strategy (Fig. 12. A-B, F). In this case, the corallites are closely packed and show connecting tubuli. These colonies grew on chaetetid colonies. Roemeripora from Fuenteobejuna Section (Fig. 8. E-F) and Neomultithecopora cantabrica from Playa de la Huelga section share the same strategy and develop massive colonies (Fig. 8. C-D).
Syringopora sp. B, Multithecopora sp. A and Multithecopora sp. B from Antolin and Sierra de la Estrella sections show a lower density of corallites and branched colonies (Fig. 5. B-C). It is probably due to the substrate. It is composed of peloidal carbonate produced by microbial communities. Due to early lithification, the substrate was firm but not hard, providing less support for the high density of corallites. This strategy is also used by Multithecopora hontoriense (Fig. 12. E), Multithecopora sp. C, Multithecopora sp. H (Playa de la Huelga, Pico Guillermo, El Collado, La Cornuda sections, respectively) and Neomultithecopora sp. from Morra de Lechugales section (Merino-Tome et al. 2009). All these morphotypes show bushy colonies with unlimited vertical growth. In the case ofM. hontoriense and Neomultithecopora cantabrica, they grew on chaetetid skeletons and brachiopod shells (Fig, 7. C).
Multithecopora sp. D (Valdeteja section), Multithecopora sp. B (Fuenteobejuna section), Multithecopora sp. F (Este de Camasobres section), Neomultithecopora cantabrica (Prioro and Playa de la Huelga sections) and some specimens of Multithecopora sp. A (Sierra de la Estrella) show an initial stage of reptant growth (Fig. 5. E-F; 7. B; Fig. 11. B) followed by an erect growth with corallites vertical and parallel forming typical phaceloid colonies (Fig. 10A-B).
Multithecopora sp. E (Las Ilces and Piedrasluengas sections), Sinopora (Celada de Roblecedo Section), Multithecopora sp. G (Prioro Section), some colonies of Multithecopora sp. F (Este de Camasobres Section) and Sinopora (Celada de Roblecedo Section) follow the strategy of developing a stepped offsetting in response to an aggrading substrate (when they grew related to microbial communities) or to competition with other organisms. Well-preserved examples of this strategy are found also in Multithecopora hontoriense (Pico Guillermo section) and Multithecopora sp. E (Las Ilces section), where the colonies are influenced by the substrate that cut the vertical development and finally is distorted in several bands (Fig. 10. D; Fig. 12. C).
The Auloporicae that do not occur in buildups and show also diverse growth strategies, adapted usually to environments with high energy or high terrigenous influx:
Mastopora? occurs in calcareous sandstones with planar lamination associated with encrusting bryozoans and crinoidal ossicles. It grew in an environment of quite high energy and near shore. It shows reptant growth developing a complete encrusting sheet (Fig. 9F).
Aulopora morphotypes occur mainly in marly facies, associated with rugose corals (Fig. 13A-F) and chaetetids. They grew in columnar profiles (Aulopora sp. A) or in branching bushes (Aulopora sp. B). All occurrences whatever autochthonous or allochthonous, show evidence of terrigenous influx.
Cladochonus morphotypes show simple lateral branches with a reptant growth habit and zig-zag trajectories (Fig.8B). Scrutton (1997) regarded this strategy as due to development in a soft substrate.
As explained above, the auloporids from the Iberian Peninsula occur in different habitats, developed diverse strategies and were related to different fossil assemblages. However, there is a typical assemblage, which is repeated in many cases. It is the "Chaetetid-auloporoid-rugose coral buildups" described by West (1988), Minwegen (2001) and Wahlman (2002), as an interrelationship between corals and chaetetids, using each other as substrate and framework. The Pennsylvanian buildups from the Iberian Peninsula show different assemblages of reef-building organisms, including Donezella, Anthracoporella, Petschoria, phylloid algae and bryozoans. Auloporoids are present in all of them, but their most common association includes the presence of chaetetids.
Figure 14 shows the stratigraphical distribution of the morphotypes and species of auloporoid corals studied herein. The auloporoids show many overlaps between the ranges of the morphotypes in both regions (Ossa-Morena and Cantabrian zones). There is also a reduced representation in the uppermost Mississippian and lowermost Pennsylvanian. In contrast, the record is quite complete in the Visean and from the Bashkirian to Moscovian. It is due to the scarcity of outcrops and/or the unfavourable environments. As the identification and assignation of new species names is still not completely finished, this is a provisional chart, which will be improved with further studies.
Auloporid corals are highly diverse in the Carboniferous of the Iberian Peninsula, mainly in the outcrops of the Ossa-Morena Zone (Mississippian age) and Cantabrian Zone (Pennsylvanian age). The auloporids have been identified following the criteria proposed by Tchudinova in (1980) with some modifications. They have been subdivided into morphotypes and grouped according to common characteristics.
Eighteen morphotypes and two species belonging to nine nominal genera have been identified (Multithecopora sp. A-H, Syringopora sp. A-B, Aulopora sp. A-B, Cladochonus sp. A-B, Syringoalcyon sp., Roemeripora sp., Sinopora sp., Mastopora? sp., Multithecopora hontoriense and Neomultithecopora cantabrica).
Syringopora, in the Carboniferous from the Iberian Peninsula is only present in the Mississippian. The dominant genus through the Carboniferous is Multithecopora, represented by 8 morphotypes and one species. Forms with pseudocerioid growth habit were derived from phaceloid forms: Roemeripora from Syringopora in the Mississippian and Neomultithecopora from Multithecopora in the Pennsylvanian.
The genus Syringoalcyon, which is globally very scarce, is quite abundant in the Los Santos de Maimona Basin. The validity of this genus is doubtful and it will be further studied in the future.
These corals inhabited different environments, and show diverse growth strategies. They lived in buildups (reefmounds, patch-reefs), on microbial mounds, in reef-flats and carbonate shallow platforms). The microfacies study shows that these corals inhabited shallow, well oxygenated waters with normal marine salinity. Those environments allowed the development of diverse communities in which the auloporoids were related to rugose corals, chaetetids, crinoids, brachiopods, algae, foraminifers, molluscs, etc. The biostratigraphic distribution has been established for the proposed morphotypes as a provisional chart, which will be improved with further taxonomic studies.
Ian D. Somerville and Esperanza M. Fernandez-Martinez who critically reviewed an early draft, have contributed significantly to the improvement of the final version. This
study has been supported through the Spanish Science Ministry (Project CGL 2009-1034/BTE) and the UCM Research Group 910231. Ismael Coronado acknowledges financial support through an UCM FPI grant. The authors are grateful to Isabel Diaz Megias for her help in the preparation of thin sections. This article is a contribution to the Spanish Working Group IGCP 56.
Alonso, J.L. (1989): Sintesis cartografica de la Region del Manto del Esla. Trabajos de Geologia 18, 155-163.
Aretz, M., Herbig, H.-G. (2010): Corals from the Upper Visean of the southern Azrou-Khenifra Basin (Carboniferous, Central Moroccan Meseta). Palaeoworld 19, 294-305. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2010.08.003
Bahamonde, J. R., Kenter, J. A. M., Della Porta, G., Hoeflaken, F. V. (2008): Facies belt of a Carboniferous carbonate platform (San Antolin- La Huelga section, NE Cantabrian Zone, Nothern Spain). Trabajos de Geologia 28, 69-86.
Boll, F.-C. (1985): Rugose Korallen der Flachwasser-Fazies im Oberkarbon des kantabrischen Gebirges (Nordspanien). Palaeontographica: Palaozoologie-Stratigraphie 190, 90 p.
Colmenero, J. R., Fernandez, L. P., Moreno, C., Bahamonde, J. R., Barba, P., Heredia, N., Gonzalez, F. (2002): Carboniferous. In: W. Gibbons and T. Moreno (Eds.), The geology of Spain: Geological Society, Bath, United Kingdom: 93-116.
Coronado, I. (2008): Estudio biosedimentario de la seccion de Las Ilces, Formacion Cosgaya, Carbonifero, Master Project, Complutense University, Madrid: 79 p.
Coronado, I., Rodriguez, S. (2009): Analisis de microfacies de los monticulos de la Formacion Cosgaya. Seccion de Las Ilces, Pensilvanico, Cantabria. Coloquios de Paleontologia 59, 61-91.
Corrochano, D., Barba, P., Colmenero, J. (in press) Transgressiveregressive sequence stratigraphy of Pennsylvanian Donezella bioherms in a foreland basin (Lena Group, Cantabrian Zone, NW Spain). Facies, 1-20. doi: 10.1007/s10347-011-0282-0
Corrochano, D., Barba, P., Colmenero, J. R., Alonso Chaves, F. M., Fernandez Rodriguez, C., Morales Gonzalez, J. A., Colombo Pinol, F. (2009): Distribucion de facies y evolucion de un margen de plataforma carbonatada pensilvaniense en el sector lois-ciguera de la cuenca carbonifera central asturiana (zona cantabrica). Geogaceta 46, 63-66.
Cozar, P (2004): Foraminiferal and algal evidence for the recognition of the Asbian/Brigantian boundary in the guadiato area (Mississippian, southwestern Spain). Revista Espanola de Micropaleontologia 36 (3), 367-388.
Cozar, P., Rodriguez, S. (1999): Descripcion e interpretacion de los afloramientos del carbonifero inferior en las proximidades de Penarroya-Pueblonuevo (Cordoba, Espana). Coloquios de Paleontologia 50, 161-200.
Cozar, P, Rodriguez, S. (2000): Caracterizacion estratigrafica y sedimentologica del Viseense superior de Sierra Boyera (Area del Guadiato, SO de Espana). Revista de la Sociedad Geologica de Espana 13, 91-104.
Cozar, P, Rodriguez, S. (2001): Precisiones sedimentologicas y bioestratigraficas en la Unidad del Fresnedoso, Area del Guadiato (Mississippiense, SO de Espana). Boletin de la Real Sociedad de Historia Natural (Seccion Geologica) 96, 69-84.
Cozar, P, Rodriguez, S. (2004): Pendleian (early Serpukhovian) marine carbonates from SW Spain: sedimentology, biostratigraphy and depositional model. Geological Journal 39, 25-47. doi: 10.1002/ gj.942
Cozar, P, Rodriguez-Martinez, M., Falces, S., Mas, R., Rodriguez, S. (2003): Stratigraphic setting in the development of microbial mud mounds of the Lower Carboniferous of the Guadiato Area (SW Spain). SEPM Special Publication 78, 57-67.
Cozar, P, Somerville, I. D., Rodriguez, S., Medina-Varea, P. (2007): New genera of late Visean metaspondyl dasycladales from the Fuenteobejuna section (Mississippian of the Guadiato Valley, southwestern Spain). Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie--Abhandlungen 246, 97-109. doi: 10.1127/0077-7749/2007/0246-0097
Dunham, R. J. (1962): Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. Memoir - American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 108-121.
Eichmuller, K. (1985): Die Valdeteja Formation: Aufbau und Geschichte einer oberkarbonischen Karbonatplattform (Kantabrisches Gebirge, Nordspanien). Facies 13, 45-153.
Fernandez, L. P, Barba, P, (1992): Zonacion ambiental de mounds algales del Carbonifero de la Zona Cantabrica (NO de Espana. Geogaceta 12, 95-96.
Fernandez, L. P, Fernandez-Martinez, E., Mendez-Bedia, S., Rodriguez, S., Soto, F. (1995): Devonian and Carboniferous Reefal Facies from the Cantabrian Zone (NW Spain). In: A. Perejon (Eds.), VII International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria and Porifera: Field trip A, Madrid: p. 76.
Gomez-Herguedas, A., Rodriguez, S. (2008): Palaeoenvironmental analysis based on rugose corals and microfacies: a case study at La Cornuda section (early Serpukhovian, Guadiato Area, SW Spain). Lethaia 42, 39-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.2008.00106.x
van der Graaff, W. J. E (1971a): The Piedrasluengas Limestone, a possible model of limestone facies distribution in the Carboniferous of the Cantabrian Mountains. Trabajos de Geologia 3, 151-159.
van de Graaff, W. J. E. (1971b): Three Upper Carboniferous, limestone-rich, high-destructive delta systems with submarine fan deposits, Cantabrian Mountains, Spain. Leidse Geologische Mededelingen 46, 157-235.
Herbig, H.-G. (1984): Rekonstruktion eines nicht mehr existenten Sedimentations-raums; Die Kalkgeroelle im Karbon-Flysch der Malagiden (Betische Kordillere, Suedspanien). Facies 11, 1-108. doi: 10.1007/BF02536907
Hill, D. (1981): Rugosa and Tabulata. Teichert C (ed) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part F [Coelenterata] Suppl 1. Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas: 672 p.
Julivert, M. (1971): Decollement tectonics in the Hercynian Cordillera of Northwest Spain. American Journal of Science 270, 1-29.
van Loon, A. J. (1971): The stratigraphy of the Westphalian C around Prioro (Prov. Leon, Spain). Trabajos de Geologia 3, 231-263.Lotze, F. (1945): Zur Gliederung der Varisziden der Iberischen Meseta. Geotektonische Forschungen 6, 78-92.
Mamet, B. (1974): Une zonation par foraminiferes du Carbonifere inferieur de la Tethys Occidentale. VII Congres International de Stratigraphie et de Geologie du Carbonifere, Comptes Rendus 3 391-408.
Martinez Chacon, M. L., Merino-Tome, O. A., Villa, E. (2001): Brachiopod and fusulinid assemblages of Kasimovian (Pennsylvanian) age from the Andara Massif (Picos de Europa, northern Spain). Scripta Geologica Special Issues 7, 54-91.
Merino-Tome, O., Bahamonde, J. R., Samankassou, E., Villa, E. (2009): The influence of terrestrial run off on marine biotic communities: An example from a thrust-top carbonate ramp (Upper Pennsylvanian foreland basin, Picos de Europa, NW Spain). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 278, 1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.04.002
Minwegen, E. (2001): Die Biokonstruktionen im Pennsylvanium des Kantabrischen Gebirges (Nordspanien). [Pennsylvanian bioconstructions of the Cantabrian Mountains (Northern Spain).] Koelner Forum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologie 9, 139.
Nelson, S. J. (1977): Mississippian syringoporid corals, Southern Canadian Rocky Mountains. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 25, 518-581.
Niko, S. (1998): Auloporid Tabulate Corals from the Carboniferous Ichinotani Formation, Gifu Prefecture Bulletin of the National Science Museum Series C, Geology and Paleontology 24, 113-128.
Nowinski, A. (1991): Late Carboniferous to Early Permian Tabulata from Spitsbergen. Palaeontologia Polonica 51, 3-74.
Perez-Estaun, A., Bea, F., Bastida, F., Marcos, A., Matinez-Catalan, J. R., Martinez-Poryatos, D., Arenas, R., Diaz-Garcia, F., Azor, A., Simancas, J. F., Gonzalez-Lodeiro, F. (2004): La cordillera varisca europea: El Macizo Iberico. In: J.A. Vera (ed.), Geologia de Espana. Instituto Geologico y Minero de Espana and Sociedad Geologica de Espana, Madrid: pp. 19-230.
Poty, E. (2010): Morphological limits to diversification of the rugose and tabulate corals. Palaeoworld 19, 389-400. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2010.09.006
Rodriguez-Martinez, M., Cozar, P., Mas, R., Rodriguez, S. (2003): Upper Visean Saccamminopsis-sponge microbial mud mounds, Sierra de la Estrella, southwestern Spain. In: W. M. Ahr, P. M. Harris, W. A. Morgan and I. D. Somerville (Eds.), Permo-Carboniferous Carbonate Platforms and Reefs - Special Publication - Society for Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Memoir 78, 189-200.
Rodriguez, S. (1984): Corales rugosos del Carbonifero del este de Asturias. Carboniferous rugose corals of eastern Asturias. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain: 592 p.
Rodriguez, S. (1985): Aportaciones de los corales rugosos a la datacion del Devonico y Carbonifero de Ossa-Morena. Temas Geologicos y Mineros. Instituto Geologico y Minero de Espana 7, 1-6.
Rodriguez, S. (1996): Development of coral reef-facies during the Visean at Los Santos de Maimona, SW Spain. In: P. Strogen, I. D. Somerville and G. Ll. Jones, Recent Advances in Lower Carboniferous Geology, Geological Society Special Publications 107, 145152.
Rodriguez, S., Falces, S. (1996): Los corales rugosos del Carbonifero de Ossa-Morena; estado actual de los conocimientos. Revista Espanola de Paleontologia Special number X Jornadas de Paleontologia, 97-102.
Rodriguez, S., Falces, S., Arribas, M. E., de la Pena, J. A., Comas Rengifo, M. J., Moreno Eiris, E. (1992): Analisis paleontologico y sedimentologico de la cuenca carbonifera de Los Santos de Maimona (Badajoz); descripcion litoestratigrafica y aspectos sedimentologicos de las unidades. Coloquios de Paleontologia 44, 49-89.
Rodriguez, S., Falces, S., Cozar, P. (1997): Development of dissepimented rugose corals in Moscovian soft bottom environments at Ribadesella (Asturias, NW Spain). Boletin de la Real Sociedad deHistoria Natural (Geologia) 92, 209-223.
Rodriguez, S., Ramirez, C. (1987): Los siringoporidos de la Seccion de la Playa de la Huelga (Carbonifero, Asturias, NW de Espana). Boletin de la Real Sociedad Espanola de Historia Natural (Geologia) 83, 57-82.
Rodriguez, S., Rodriguez-Curt, L. (2002): Reconstruccion de una plataforma carbonatada Viseense no preservada en el Area del Guadiato (Cordoba, SO de Espana). Geogaceta 32, 283-286.
Rodriguez, S., Rodriguez-Curt, L., Hernando, J. M. (2001): Estudio de los aulophyllidae (rugosa) del viseense superior de la unidad de la Sierra del Castillo (Cordoba, Espana). Coloquios de Paleontologia 52, 47-78.
Rodriguez, S., Somerville, I. D. (2007): Comparisons of rugose corals from The Upper Visean of SW Spain and Ireland: implications for improved resolutions in Late Mississippian coral biostratigraphy. Schriftenreihe der Erdwissenschaftlichen Kommissionen. 17, 275305
Said, I., Rodriguez, S., Berkhli, M., Cozar, P., Gomez-Herguedas, A. (2010): Environmental parameters of a coral assemblage from the Akerchi Formation (carboniferous), Adarouch area, central Morocco. Journal of Iberian Geology 36, 7-19.
Sando, W. J. (1984): Syringoporoid corals: guides to the stratigraphy of upper Paleozoic rocks in the Western Interior Region. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Geological Survey.
Scrutton, C. T. (1997): Growth strategies and colonial form in tabulate corals. Boletin de la Real Sociedad Espanola de Historia Natural (Geologia) 91, 179-191.
Stasinska, A. (1982): Colony structure and systematic assignment of Cladochonus tenuicollis McCoy, 1847 (Hydroidea). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 27, 59-64.
Tchudinova, I. I. (1975): Revision of the Syringopora described by A.A. Stuckenberg. Paleontological Journal 9, 7-19.
Tchudinova, I. I. (1980): Morphogenesis of Syringoporida. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 25, 505-511.
Tourneur, F., Boulvain, F., Young, G. A. (1995): Reinterpretation of Syringoalcyon Termier and Termier 1945 (Tabulata); syringoporid coral with epibionts. VII Int. Symp. On Fossil Cnidaria and Porifera. Madrid: 92-93.
Villa, E. (1995): Fusulinaceos carboniferos del este de Asturias (N de Espana). Carboniferous Fusulinacea from eastern Asturias, northern Spain. Biostratigraphie du Paleozoique 13, 261.
Villa, E., Sanchez de Posada, L. C., Fernandez, L. P., Martinez-Chacon, M. L., Stavros, C. (2001): Foraminifera and biostratigraphy of the
I. Coronado (1,2) *, S. Rodriguez (1,2)
(1) Departamento de Paleontologia, Facultad de Ciencias Geologicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
(2) Instituto de Geociencias IGEO (CSIC, UCM). C/ Jose Antonio Novais 2, Ciudad Universitaria. E-28040 Madrid, Spain
e-mail addresses: email@example.com (I.C., * corresponding autor); firstname.lastname@example.org (S.R.)
Received: 23 July 2012 / Accepted: 4 December 2013 / Available online: 25 February 2014
Table 1.--Main taxonomical characters (modified from Tchudinova, 1980) for the auloporids of the Iberian Peninsula. ANT = Antolin, COLL = El Collado, SE = Sierra de la Estrella, SS = Los Santos de Maimona, FOB = Fuenteobejuna, ADF = Adelfilla, E10 = Playa de la Ehielga, ECM = Este de Camasobres, CRS = Celada de Roblecedo, PLU = Piedrasluengas, IL = Las Ilces and PR = Prioro. Taxa Locality Colony morpholy Multithecopora sp. A ANT, FOB, SE, Phaceloid COLL, SS Multithecopora sp. B FOB-ANT Phaceloid Multithecopora sp. C El Collado Bushy Multithecopora sp. D Val deteja Phaceloid Multithecopora sp. E PLU and IL Phaceloid-Bushy Multithecopora sp. F ECM Reptant-Bushy Multithecopora sp. G Prioro (PR) Bushy Multithecopora sp. H SA-COR Phaceloid Multithecopora HO Reptant-Phaceloid hontoriense Sinopora sp. CRS Bushy Neomultithecopora HO and PR Phaceloid, cantabrica massive-proximal Roemeripora sp. FOV Cerioid Syringoalcyon sp. SS Fasciculate Syringopora sp. A SS Fasciculate Syringopora sp. B ANT and ADF Fasciculate Cladochonus sp. A El Collado Prostrate Cladochonus sp. B Valdeteja Prostrate in zigzag Mastopora? sp. HO Reptant-proximal Aulopora sp. A Ribadesella Reptant-dendroid Aulopora sp. B Ribadesella Reptant-bushy Taxa Coralite morphology Corallite diameter (mm) Multithecopora sp. A Cylindrical X = 1.96 (1.47-2.85) Multithecopora sp. B Cylindrical X = 1.06 (0.92-1.34) Multithecopora sp. C Cylindrical X = 1.45 (1.04-2.01) Multithecopora sp. D Cylindrical X = 1.79 (1.23-2.10) Multithecopora sp. E Cylindrical--Irregular X = 1.71 (1.24-2.31) Multithecopora sp. F Cylindrical X = 1.39 (1.02-1.79) Multithecopora sp. G Cylindrical X = 1.44 (0.95-1.79) Multithecopora sp. H Cylindrical--Irregular X = 2.33 (1.99-2.82) Multithecopora Cylindrical X = 2.25 hontoriense (1.96-2.73) Sinopora sp. Cylindrical X = 1.93 (1.58-2.31) Neomultithecopora 1 regular to prismatic X = 1.72 cantabrica (1.44-2.25) Roemeripora sp. Prismatic-Irregular X = 2.97 (2.27-3.57) Syringoalcyon sp. Cylindrical--Irregular X = 2.38 (1.62-2.87) Syringopora sp. A Cylindrical--Irregular X = 2.76 (2.26-3.31) Syringopora sp. B Irregular and Cylindrical X = 2.95 (2.65-3.36) Cladochonus sp. A X = 1.40 (1.05-2.45) Cladochonus sp. B Initially cylindrical, X = 2.14 funnel-shape finally (1.03-4.22) Mastopora? sp. Cylindrical X = 1.02 (0.64-1.28) Aulopora sp. A Funnel-shape X = 0.79 (0.34-0.99) Aulopora sp. B Funnel-shape X = 0.82 (0.67-1) Dimensions Taxa Lumen Wall diameter (mm) thickness (mm) Multithecopora sp. A X=0.5 X=1.4 (0.39-0.7) (1.03-2.4) Multithecopora sp. B X=0.55 X=0.64 (0.36-0.9) (0.16-1.02) Multithecopora sp. C X=0.63 X=0.817 (0.33-1.21) (0.20-1.52) Multithecopora sp. D X=0.57 X=1.21 (0.27-0.98) (0.63-1.70) Multithecopora sp. E X=0.83 X=0.96 (0.33-1.40) (0.41-1.40) Multithecopora sp. F X=0.56 X=0.82 (0.34-0.87) (0.44-1.31) Multithecopora sp. G X=0.71 X=0.76 (0.25-1.30) (0.11-1.36) Multithecopora sp. H X=1.41 X=0.90 (0.60-1.74) (0.31-1.60) Multithecopora X=0.37 X=1.88 hontoriense (0.26-0.43) (1.55-2.32) Sinopora sp. X=1.01 X=0.90 (0.57-1.39) (0.50-1.52) Neomultithecopora X= 1.16 X=0.55 cantabrica (0.041-1.19) (0.04-1,19) Roemeripora sp. X=1.97 X=0.99 (1.16-2.57) (0.28-2.20) Syringoalcyon sp. X=1.79 X=0.59 (1.37-1.99) (0-1.50) Syringopora sp. A X=1.92 X=0.84 (1.36-2.24) (0.39-1.94) Syringopora sp. B X=2.11 X=0.85 (1.20-2.43) (0.51-1.81) Cladochonus sp. A X=0.35 X=0.78 (0.27-0.5) (0.25-1.03) Cladochonus sp. B X=1.21 X=0.92 (0.31-3.38) (0.68-1.21) Mastopora? sp. X=0.54 X=0.47 (0.33-0.82) (0.13-0.90) Aulopora sp. A X=0.58 X=0.21 (0.28-0.75) (0.09-057) Aulopora sp. B X=0.44 X=0.34 (0.3-0.72) (0.1-0.65) Dimensions Taxa Diameter/Lumen Septal spines Multithecopora sp. A X=3.81 Abundant- (2.47-6.66) Acute Multithecopora sp. B X=1.99 Abundant- (1.15-3.48) Acute Multithecopora sp. C X=2.56 Common- (1.17-4.15) Scarce Multithecopora sp. D X=3.62 Septal (1.75-6.9) projections Multithecopora sp. E X=2.52 Septal (0.98-5.17) projections Multithecopora sp. F X=2.66 Small septal (1.55-4.18) projections Multithecopora sp. G X=2.60 Small-Blunt- (0.93-5.54) Scatter Multithecopora sp. H X=1.76 Plentiful- (1.18-3.66) Acute Multithecopora X=6.08 Septal hontoriense (1.11-6.26) projections- Common Sinopora sp. X=1.91 Absent (1.42-3.05) Neomultithecopora X=1.53 Common- cantabrica (1.03-2.68) Scarce Roemeripora sp. X=1.55 Abundant- (1.13-2.89) Acute Syringoalcyon sp. X=1.34 Abundant-in (0.91-2.09) Rows-Acute Syringopora sp. A X=1.47 Abundant- (1.18-2.42) Scarce-Acute Syringopora sp. B X=1.47 Abundant- (1.22-2.51) scarce-Acute Cladochonus sp. A X=4.01 Absent (4-4.9) Cladochonus sp. B X=2.11 Absent (1.24-3.54) Mastopora? sp. X=1.99 Scarce-Small- (1.26-3.37) Acute Aulopora sp. A X=1.42 Absent (0.82-2.35) Aulopora sp. B X=1.82 Absent (1.16-3.15) Microstructure Taxa Tabulae Connecting L=lamellar, structures F=fibrous Multithecopora sp. A Thin-Scarce- -- F-L-F Concave Multithecopora sp. B Thin-Scarce- -- F-L-F Concave Multithecopora sp. C Thin-Scarce- -- L-F Concave Multithecopora sp. D Thin-Concave- -- F-L-F-L-F Convex Multithecopora sp. E Thin-Irregular -- F-L-F Multithecopora sp. F Thin-Irregular -- F-L-F Multithecopora sp. G Thin-Scarce- -- F-L-F Convex Multithecopora sp. H Very scarce- -- F-L concave Multithecopora Scarce- -- F-L-F-L-F hontoriense horizontal- concave Sinopora sp. Absent or -- F-L concave Neomultithecopora Curved- Tubuli F-L-F cantabrica horinzontal- infundibuliform Roemeripora sp. Infundibuliform Tubuli L Syringoalcyon sp. Infundibuliform- Tubuli L horizontal Syringopora sp. A Infundibuliform- Tubuli L thick Syringopora sp. B Infundibuliform- Tubuli L thick Cladochonus sp. A Absent -- F Cladochonus sp. B Irregular en -- L-F calyx-curved- scarce Mastopora? sp. Thick-concave -- -- Aulopora sp. A Infundibuliform- -- -- horizontal Aulopora sp. B Absent -- L Microstructure Taxa Observations Multithecopora sp. A Lamellar with a small inner and extern fibrous development Multithecopora sp. B Lamellar with a small inner and extern fibrous development Multithecopora sp. C Lamellar and intern fibrous Multithecopora sp. D Alternate lamellar and fibrous. Inner fibrous highly developed. Multithecopora sp. E Extern and inner fibrous, the inner less developed. Multithecopora sp. F Extern and inner fibrous, the inner less developed. Multithecopora sp. G Extern and inner fibrous, the inner less developed. Very irregular. Multithecopora sp. H Extern fibrous (in calix) and lamellar. Multithecopora Midde fibrous sometimes hontoriense not appears. Sinopora sp. Extern fibrous highly developed. Neomultithecopora Extern fibrous more cantabrica developed than inner. Large lamellar. Roemeripora sp. Lamellar, radial aggregates shape. Syringoalcyon sp. Ephitecal scales. Syringopora sp. A With wavy microstructure for septal spines. Syringopora sp. B With wavy microstructure for septal spines. Cladochonus sp. A Fibers. Poorly preserved Cladochonus sp. B Lamellar and extern fibrous. Gradual transition between lamellae and fibres. Mastopora? sp. Fibrous possible but not observe correctly Aulopora sp. A -- Aulopora sp. B Lamellae Table 2.--Localities and microfacies associated with the auloporid corals, geometry and lithology, main components, depositional environment and characteristics, morphotypes and age. Section Facies and depositional Geometry and lithology texture Los Santos de Boundstone (Framestone) Biostromal facies (masive Maimona / Cerro of Syringoporicae with limestones and marls) Almena packstone-wackstone matrix Sierra de la Micropeloidal Wackestone- Massive limestones-mound Estrella Boundstone (Framestone) and breccias of Multithecopora El Collado Bioclastic wackestone- Thin beds of limestones packstone in a marls succession. El Collado Bioclastic packstone- Massive and bedded wackestone limestones Antolin Micropeloidal Mudstone/ Massive limestones-mound Wackestone /Boundstone and breccias (Framestone) of Multithecopora with cryptalgal texture (Thrombolitic micrites) / Bioclastic packstone Fuenteobejuna Boundstone of Massive limestones with Multithecopora with breccias micritized grains La Adelfilla Rudstone/Boundstone Massive bioclastic (bafflestone) of limestones Syringopora /Boundstone (Bafflestone) of rugose corals La Cornuda / Micropeloidal mudstone/ Massive limestone with San Antonio wackestone /Boundstone of dome shape Multithecopora /Oncoidal packstone/ Valdeteja Cladochonus wackestone Thin beds of marls and limestones Valdeteja-- Boundstone of Massive and bedded Las Majadas Multithecopora with limestones peloidal matrix Las Ilces Boundstone of Massive limestones-mound Multithecopora with and bedded aoujgalids Piedrasluengas Boundstone (Framestone- Base of massive Bafflestone) of limestones chaetetids and corals Ribadesella Bioclastic wackestone- Silty limestones and packstone marls predominantly Este de Bioclastic Silty limestone to marly Camasobres wackestone-packstone/ limestone Boundstone (bafflestone) of corals (Thrombolitic texture) Pico Guillermo Boundstone (bafflestone) Massive and bedded of Multithecopora with limestones trombolitic texture - micropeloidal wackestone- packstone Prioro Boundstone of auloporids Massive-limestones in and chaetetids/ the north flank of the Trombolitic micrites syncline and bedded (cryptalgal texture) with limestones in the south boundstone of auloporids flank corals Playa de Boundstones (bafflestone) Massive and bedded la Huelga of Multythecopora with a limestones, marls, packstone matrix / calcareous sandstones Boundstone (Framestone) and breccias of Neomultithecopora / Boundstone (framestone) of chaetetids/Bioclastic packestone Celada de Boundstone of beresellids Thin tabular beds of Roblecedo Sur /Boundstone of Sinopora limestones and some massive limestones Section Components Depositional environment and characteristics Los Santos de Rugosans, brachiopods, Reef flat. Near to shore. Maimona / Cerro molluscs, echinoderms, Shallow, highly to Almena trilobites, endothyrids, moderately agitated textularids, bryozoans, water. Above or close to calcareous algae. effective fair-weather wave-base. Well- oxygenated, normal marine. Sierra de la Peloids, micropeloids. Top of mud-mounds and Estrella Aoujgalids, heterocorals, limestone breccias. rugosans , endothyrids, Shallow to moderately Girvanella, molluscs, deep subtidal conditions, crinoids, Thartharella below fair-weather wave- and bryozoans. base. Well-oxygenated, normal marine. El Collado Bryozoans, bivalves, Shallow carbonate echinoderms, crinoids, platform. Near to shore. calcareous algae, Shallow water, highly to Aoujgalids, rugose moderate agitate energy. corals, gastropods, Between wave base and trilobites, ostracods storm base. Well- and foraminifers. oxygenated, normal marine. El Collado Grapestones and peloids. Shallow carbonate Bryozoans, bivalves, platform. Near to shore. echinoderms, crinoids, Shallow water, highly to calcareous algae, moderate agitates energy. Aoujgalids, rugosans, Between wave base and gastropods, trilobites, storm base. Well- ostracods and oxygenated, normal foraminifers. marine. Antolin Peloids, micropeloids, Patch-reef to reef- ooids. Aoujgalids, mounds and talus facies. heterocorals, rugosans, Shallow to moderately endothytirids, deep subtidal conditions, Girvanella, molluscs, below fair-weather wave- crinoids, Thartharella base. Well-oxygenated, and bryozoans. normal marine. Fuenteobejuna Peloids, micropeloids, Near to shore. Shallow, ooids, coated grains and highly to moderately lithoclasts. Rugose agitated water. Above or corals, ostracods, close to effective fair- foraminifera, bryozoans, weather wave-base. gastropods,crinoids, Possibly vadose brachiopods, Aoujgalids, environment. other calcareous algae, cyanobacteria. La Adelfilla Micropeloids, ooids, Near to shore. Shallow, chaetetids, brachiopods, highly to moderate rugosans, foraminifers, agitated water. Between bryozoans, molluscs, wave base and storm base. echinoderms. Well-oxygenated, normal marine. La Cornuda / Micropeloids and peloids, Mud-mounds to Reef- San Antonio small bioclast fragments, mounds and associated rugosans, chaetetids, facies. Near to shore. bryozoans, calcareous Shallow, highly to algae, cyanobacteria, moderate agitate energy. crinoids, brachiopods, Between wave base and gastropods, and oncoids storm base. Well- in some facies. oxygenated, normal marine. Valdeteja Terrigenous clasts and Shallow carbonate small fragments of platform, with bioclasts, rugosans, terrigenous influx. Near other tabulate to shore. Shallow, highly cora\s(Pseudofavosites), to moderate agitated crinoids and brachiopods water. Between wave base remains. and storm base. Well- oxygenated, normal marine. Valdeteja-- Peloids, micropeloids. Top of mound and Las Majadas Thartharella, associate facies. calcisphaeras, Shallow-medium carbonate foraminifers, Donezella, platform. Near to shore. echinoderms, ostracods, Shallow, highly to trilobites and bryozoans. moderate agitate water. Between wave base and storm base. Well- oxygenated, normal marine. Las Ilces Peloids, micropeloids, Reef mound and talus intraclasts. Rugosans, facies in medium to chaetetids, Donezella, shallow carbonate Ungdarella, Petschoria, platform. Near to shore. echinoderms, Shallow, highly to Thartharella, moderate agitated water. calcisphaeras, Between wave base and foraminifers, ostracods storm base. Well- and molluscs. oxygenated, normal marine. Piedrasluengas Peloids, micropeloids, Biostrome development oncoids, rugosans, above oolitic grainstone, chaetetids, Thartharella, in shallow carbonate Tubiphytes, beresellids, platform. Near to shore. spicules, clacisphaeras, Shallow water, highly to aoujgalids, foraminifers. moderate agitated water. Between wave base and storm base. Well- oxygenated, normal marine. Ribadesella Peloids, micropeloids in Middle-shallow carbonate cavities, little platform. Near to shore. bioclasts in matrix. Shallow, highly to Rugose corals, moderate agitate water. chaetetids, aoujgalids, Between wave base and crinoids, ostracods, storm base. Well calcisphaera and oxygenated, normal marine foraminifers. water. Este de Peloids, micropeloids and Shallow carbonate Camasobres automicrite in platform, with trombolitic textures, big terrigenous influx. Near intraclasts (microbial), to shore. Shallow water oncoids. Rugosans , to moderately deep calcareous algae subtidal conditions, (Petschoria, highly to moderate Anthracoporella), agitate energy. Between Tharthaerella, wave base and storm base. gastropoda, ostracods, Well-oxygenate, normal bryozoa and foraminifers. marine. Pico Guillermo Micropeloids, Reef-mound (biostromal pseudostromatactic facies) and associated cavities and intraclasts. facies. Near to shore. Chaetetids, rugosans, Shallow, highly to crinoids, phylloid algae, moderate agitated water. foraminifers and Between wave base and Thartharella. storm base. Well- oxygenated, normal marine. Prioro Peloids, intraclasts, Mud-mounds and Reef- micropeloids, breccias, mounds. Near to shore. rugosans, chaetetids, Shallow, highly to Thartharella, moderate agitated water. echinoderms, gasteropods, Between wave base and spicules, calcareous storm base. Well- algae and foraminifers oxygenated, normal marine. Playa de Small bioclastic remains, Reef-mound and associated la Huelga breccias, rugosans, facies. Near to shore. chaetetids, brachiopods, Shallow, highly to bryozoa, crinoids, moderate agitated water. mollucs and foraminifers. Between wave base and storm base. Well- oxygenated, normal marine. Celada de Micropeloids, rims and Bioherm facies. Near to Roblecedo Sur cavities, shore. Shallow, highly to pseudostromatactis moderate agitated water. cavities. Thartharella, Between wave base and Anthracoporella, storm base. Well- Tubiphytes, chaetetids, oxygenated, normal foraminifers (textularids marine. and fusulinids), echinoderms, crinoids, calcisphaera, gastropods, aoujgalids, brachiopods. Section Morphotype Age Los Santos de MuHthecopora sp. A, late Visean Maimona / Cerro Syringoalcyon sp. & (middle-late Asbian) Almena Syringopora sp. A Sierra de la Multithecopora late Visean (late Estrella sp. A Asbian--early Brigantian) El Collado Multithecopora sp. late Visean (late A & Cladochonus sp. Asbian--early A. Brigantian) El Collado Multithecopora late Visean (early sp. C Brigantian) Antolin Multithecopora sp. late Visean (early A, Multithecopora Brigantian) sp. B & Syringopora Fuenteobejuna Multithecopora sp. late Visean (early A, Multithecopora sp. Brigantian) sp. B & Roemeripora La Adelfilla Syringopora sp. B late Visean (early Brigantian) La Cornuda / Multithecopora sp. H Serpukhovian San Antonio (Pendleian) Valdeteja Cladochonus sp. B early Bashkirian (Akavasian) Valdeteja-- Multithecopora sp. D middle Bashkirian- Las Majadas early Moscovian (Tashatinian- Vereian) Las Ilces Multithecopora sp. E late Bashkirian (Tashatinian) Piedrasluengas early Moscovian (Vereian) Ribadesella Aulopora sp. A & early Moscovian Aulopora sp. B (Vereian) Este de Multithecopora sp. F middle Moscovian Camasobres (Kashirian-early Podolskian) Pico Guillermo Multithecopora middle Moscovian hontoriense (Kashirian-early Podolskian) Prioro Multithecopora late Moscovian sp. G & (Podolskian) Neomultithecopora cantabrica Playa de Multithecopora late Moscovian la Huelga hontoriense, (Podolskian- NeomuHthecopora Myachkovian) cantabrica & Mastopora? sp. Celada de Sinopora sp. late Moscovian Roblecedo Sur (Myachkovian)
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||articulo en ingles|
|Author:||Coronado, I.; Rodriguez, S.|
|Publication:||Journal of Iberian Geology|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2014|
|Previous Article:||Sauropod trackways of the Iberian Peninsula: palaeoetological and palaeoenvironmental implications.|
|Next Article:||Morphometric discriminant analysis of isolated chondrichthyan scales for palaeoecological inferences: the Middle Triassic of the Iberian Chain...|