Printer Friendly

Carbapenemase producing bugs: a threat to antimicrobial therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Carbapenems are potent [beta]-lactam antibiotics used to treat serious infections in hospital settings. They have broad antimicrobial spectrum against both Gram-positive and Gramnegative organisms as compared to penicillins, cephalosporins and [beta]-lactam/[beta]-lactamase inhibitor. Carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria can be result of production of [beta]-lactamase enzyme known as carbapenemase, expression of efflux pumps, porin loss, and alterations in PBPs. [1] Recently, organisms belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae, mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae, and the nonfermenter group, mainly Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species have increased their potential to become extensively drug resistant by acquiring resistance to carbapenems, due mainly to carbapenemases and metallo beta lactamase (MBL) production, [2,3] respectively.

Clinically important cabapenemases include: Class A--most common type isolated clinically is Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), Class B--Metallo-[beta]-lactamases e.g.,-NDM -1, VIM type and IMP type, Class D-Oxacillin hydrolysing [beta]-lactamases or Oxacillinases e.g.,- OXA-48, OXA-181. [4] This study was done to identify carbapenemase producing organisms among multidrug resistant clinical isolates and to detect MBL producers among the carbapenemase producing isolates.

MATERIALS & METHODS: The study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology in a tertiary care hospital in north India over a period of two months (November to December 2014). Samples received from admitted patients only were included in the study. Samples received in the microbiology laboratory were processed by standard microbiological techniques. The antimicrobial susceptibility was performed using Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method and the results were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. [4] Multi-drug resistant (MDR) isolates showing reduced susceptibility or resistance to carbapenems were further tested for carbapenemase production by Modified Hodge test (MHT) and MHT positive isolates were further tested for MBL production by combined disc synergy test (CDST).

Modified Hodge Test: MHT was performed according to CLSI guidelines for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production by the isolate (Figure 1). Inoculum of E.coli ATCC 25922 was uniformly swabbed onto Mueller Hinton Agar and 10[micro]g Imipenem disk placed at the centre of the plate. The test isolate was streaked as a straight line of at-least 20-25mm length from the edge of the disk to the edge of the plate and the plate incubated at 37[degrees]C in ambient air for 16-20 hours and thereafter examined for enhanced growth around the test organism streak at the intersection of the streak and the zone of inhibition. Enhancement of growth was considered as positive result and no enhancement of growth as negative result for carbapenemase production, respectively. [5,6]

Combined Disk Synergy Test: CDST was performed for testing MBL production using two 10[micro]g Imipenem disks with one disk containing 292[micro]g EDTA, placed 25mm apart (figure 2). An increase in zone diameter of [greater than or equal to]4mm around the Imipenem-EDTA disk as compared to that of Imipenem disk alone was considered positive for MBL production. [2,7]

RESULTS: A total of 62 clinical isolates that were resistant either to imipenem or meropenem or both were tested by MHT. These included 20 Escherichia coli (Urine=14, blood=1, pus=3, ET tip=1, peritoneal fluid=1), 5 Klebsiella pneumoniae (Urine=5), 16 Pseudomonas spp. (Urine=1, blood=1, pus=2, ET tip=1, wound swab=11), 13 Acinetobacter spp. (urine, pus, BAL, sputum, suction tip=1 each, ET tip=4, wound swab=4), 6 Enterobacter species (Urine=3, pus 2, ET tip=1), 1 Citrobacter koseri (Blood=1) and 1 Proteus vulgaris (Tissue=1) isolates. Of these, 32 (51.6%) isolates were positive for carbapenemase production by MHT which included 10 (50%) E.coli (Urine=7, pus=3), 5 (100%) Klebsiella pneumoniae (Urine=5), 6 (37.5%) Pseudomonas spp. (Pus=6), 8 (61.5%) Acinetobacter spp. (Pus=8), 1(16.6%) Enterobacter spp. (pus=1), 1(100%) Citrobacter koseri (Blood=1) and 1(100%) Proteus vulgaris (Pus=1).

Out of the 32 MHT positive isolates, 4 (12.5%) were positive for MBL production by CDST. MBL producers were 2 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from urine, 1 Pseudomonas spp. isolated from wound swab and 1 Acinetobacter spp. isolated from endotracheal secretions (Table 1).

DISCUSSION: Carbapenems like Imipenem, Meropenem and Ertapenem are mainly used as reserve drugs in treatment of life threatening infections in severely ill, immune compromised, patients hospitalised for prolonged duration, etc who are more prone to acquire multidrug resistant infections. They are clinically important for treating extended spectrum ([beta]-lactamase (ESBL) producing enterobacteriaceae which along with Pseudomonas species and Acinetobacter species are predominantly isolated pathogens from clinical samples.

Production of carbapenem hydrolysing enzymes, also known as carbapenemases, by the enterobacteriaceae has led to emergence of carbapenem resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Carbapenemase production in these organisms has reduced the clinical utility of carbapenem group of drugs posing a major challenge in treatment of severe infections. [8] Therefore a rapid, simple and reliable method for detection of carbapenemase production is needed.

Among carbapenemase producers, metallo-[beta]-lactamase production was 12.5% in this study which is less than that reported in other studies. Shenoy et al reported phenotypic MBL production in 93.24% MDR isolates. [6] MBL production among carbapenem resistant K. pneumoniae isolates has been detected as 88.33%[7] and 75%. [9] Another study in south India has reported carbapenemase production and MBL production as 14.3% and 6.5% in Acinetobacter baumanii, 28.1% and 50% in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 14.3% and 28.6% in Pseudomonas species, [10] respectively. A comparatively lesser occurrence of carbapenemase production among carbapenem resistant isolates in this study can be due to presence of other mechanisms like Amp C co-production, loss of porin channels, expression of efflux pumps and presence of altered PBPs.

The limitations in this study are relatively small sample size, short duration of the study and its restriction to phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production and MBL identification. Genotypic characterisation which confirms presence carbapenemase producing genes was not done.

Carbapenemase producing pathogens cause infections that are difficult to treat and have high mortality rates, due to their appearance in multidrug-resistant pathogens like K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. Their occurrence in outbreak settings is being reported increasingly. Careful detection is required, because high carbapenem MICs are not usually evident.

Various factors like over the counter use of antibiotics, irrational use of antibiotics, easily accessible higher antibiotics, lack of adequate health measures and improper sanitation and living conditions are considered crucial for their development and spread. [7] Evaluation of effective antibiotic options and rigorous infection control measures will help in controlling spread of carbapenemase producing MDR organisms in hospitals. Combination antibiotic therapy and avoidance of irrational carbapenem use are effective measures to prevent evolution of MDR & XDR organisms.

Phenotypic tests for carbapenemase detection like MHT and CDST are simple, cost effective and easy to perform and hence can be used in any microbiology laboratory to detect carbapenemase production and applied clinically to guide the antimicrobial therapy, especially in severe and life threatening infections.

Fig. 1 : Positive Modified Hodge Test - Clover leaf shaped enhancement of growth around the test streak at the intersection of streak and the zone of inhibition.

Fig. 2 : Positive CDST ([double dagger])--Difference of [greater than or equal to] 4mm in the diameter of zone of inhibition of Imipenem and Imipenem + EDTA **.

DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/1564

REFERENCES:

[1.] Bedenic B, Plecko V, Sardelic S, Uzunovic S, Torkar KG. Carbapenemases in Gram-Negative Bacteria: Laboratory Detection and Clinical Significance. BioMed research international. 2014; 2014.

[2.] Yong D, Lee K, Yum JH, Shin HB, Rossolini GM, Chong Y. Imipenem -EDTA disk method for differentiation of metallo-[beta]-lactamase- producing clinical isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 3798-01.

[3.] Franklin C, Liolios L, Peleg AY. Phenotypic detection of carbapenem susceptible metallo [beta]-lactamase producing Gram negative bacilli in the clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 3139-44.

[4.] Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007; 20: 440-58.

[5.] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-fourth informational supplement. 2014; M100-S24.

[6.] Shenoy KA, Jyothi EK, Ravikumar R. Phenotypic identification & molecular detection of bla (ndm-1) gene in multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacilli in a tertiary care centre. Indian J Med Res. 2014; 139: 625-31

[7.] Gupta V, Singla N, Chander J. Use of two double disk synergy tests to detect metallo beta lactamases in nonfermenters. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2008; 128(5): 671-672.

[8.] Sood S. Identification and Differentiation of Carbapenemases in Klebsiella Pneumoniae: A Phenotypic Test Evaluation Study from Jaipur, India. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2014; 8(7): DC01-DC03.

[9.] Datta P, Gupta V, Garg S, Chander J. Phenotypic method for differentiation of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: Study from north India. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology. 2012; 55(3): 357-360.

[10.] Noyal M, Menezes G, Harish B, Sujatha S, Parija S. Simple screening tests for detection of carbapenemases in clinical isolates of nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria. 2009; 129(6): 707-712.

AUTHORS:

(1.) Anuniti Mathias

(2.) Aroma Oberoi

(3.) Vipin Sam Alexander

PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:

(1.) Post Graduate Resident, Department of Microbiology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana.

(2.) Professor & HOD, Department of Microbiology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana.

(3.) Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana.

FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None

NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:

Dr. Aroma Oberoi, Professor & HOD, Department of Microbiology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana-141008, Punjab. E-mail: draromaoberoi@yahoo.com

Date of Submission: 12/07/2015.

Date of Peer Review: 13/07/2015.

Date of Acceptance: 27/07/2015.

Date of Publishing: 03/08/2015.

Table 1: Summary of Carbapenemase production by multidrug
resistant gram negative bacilli

Isolate (Total)           Specimen
                          (MHT * + ve)
                          Urine       Blood       Pus/Body
                                                  fluids

E.coli (20)                14 (07)       01       05 (03)
K.pneumoniae (05)          05 (05)       --          --
Pseudomonas (16)             01          01       14 (06)
Acinetobacter (13)           01          --       12 (08)
Enterobacter (06)            03          --       03 (01)
Citrobacter koseri (01)      --        01 (01)       --
Proteus vulgaris (01)        --          --       01 (01)
Total : 62

Isolate (Total)           Total      Total
                          MHT + ve   CDST ([dagger]) + ve

E.coli (20)                  10               --
K.pneumoniae (05)            05               02
Pseudomonas (16)             06               01
Acinetobacter (13)           08               01
Enterobacter (06)            01               --
Citrobacter koseri (01)      01               --
Proteus vulgaris (01)        01               --
Total : 62                   32               04

* Modified Hodge Test
([dagger]) Combined Disc Synergy Test
COPYRIGHT 2015 Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Author:Mathias, Anuniti; Oberoi, Aroma; Alexander, Vipin Sam
Publication:Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
Article Type:Report
Date:Aug 3, 2015
Words:1710
Previous Article:An unusual presentation of endometrial carcinoma: a case report.
Next Article:Chondroid lipoma--a rare lipomatous tumor: a case report.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters