Caracterizacao citogenetica e molecular de exemplares de Speothos venaticus.
The Canidae family is composed of 16 genera and 36 species of wolves, jackals, foxes and dogs (NOWAK, 1999). In Brazil, there are six species: Speothos venaticus, Chrysocyon brachyurus, Cerdocyon thous, Atelocynus microtis, Lycalopex vetulus and Pseudalopex gymnocercus. Among these, Speothos venaticus (Lund 1839), commonly known as bush dog, is highlighted due to the increasing interest in preserving its natural populations, since there are only a few specimens kept in captivity by Brazilian Institutions.
In literature, several studies have reported the use of cytogenetics and molecular genetics for the characterization of species from the Canidae family. Many of these studies aim to contribute with data about the evolution and phylogeny of this group. However, considering the different canid species occurring in Brazil, studies on genetic variability and chromosomal characterization are scarce.
As regards the species from this family, cytogenetic analyses were performed mainly by Wayne et al. (1987a and b). The authors showed the diploid complements 74, 76 and 74 chromosomes from the three South American canids species - Speothos venaticus, Chrysocyon brachyurus and Cerdocyon thous, respectively. The first two species presented karyotypes composed by acrocentric autosomal chromosomes and, through G-banding analysis it was possible to evidence a higher interspecific homeology. Hatanaka et al. (1998) presented data on chromosomal heteromorphism in a Brazilian species, Cerdocyon thous. All studied animals presented a diploid number of 74 chromosomes. Of these, 15 pairs were meta/submetacentric, and the remaining 21, acrocentric. A clear difference in size of the short arm in the large submetacentric pair (no. 3) was detected in three of the four studied animals. Brum-Zorrilla and Langguth (1980) showed Pseudalopex gymnocercus karyotype with 2n = 74 chromosomes. Pienkowska and Switonski (1998) identified the nucleolus organizer regions in Canis familiaris chromosomes.
Besides cytogenetic analysis, molecular genetics techniques were used to determine genetic differences among species, and establish possible phylogenetic relationships. Thus, based on the interest to reproduce specimens in captivity, besides the possibility of specimens relocation among different institutions, along with the probability that specimens kept in captivity are descendants from populations early geographically isolated, the goals of the present study were to analyze the chromosome group of Speothos venaticus, in order to obtain cytogenetic data that could be supplemented to the available in literature; to evaluate the transferability of microsatellite markers from the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) to the bush dog (Speothos venaticus); and to verify, based on the obtained results, the polymorphism degree of the selected loci, the genetic variability and the possibility of a pedigree analysis in these animals.
Material and methods
Whole blood samples of 5 mL were collected by venipuncture utilizing vacutainer tubes (BD, USA), containing 7.5 mg of EDTA. The sampling included all bush dog (Speothos venaticus) specimens kept in captivity by different Brazilian Institutions: Parque Zoologico de Ilha Solteira (1 female), Fundacao Zoo-Botanica de Belo Horizonte (1 female), Parque Zoologico de Americana (4 females and 4 males), Parque Estoril de Sao Bernardo do Campo (1 female and 1 male), Zoologico da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (5 females and 5 males), Fundacao Rio-Zoo (3 females and 2 males), Criatorio Toca da Raposa (3 females), Parque Zoologico de leme (2 males), and Fundacao Parque Zoologico de Sao Paulo (2 males). Peripheral blood samples were also collected from 2 domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) as control. For DNA extraction, the kit DNA GenomicPrep Cells and Tissue DNA Isolation (Amershan Biosciences) was used according to the manufacturer's specifications.
Fifteen microsatellite loci, described by Jouquand et al. (2000), were chosen for transferability analysis: Ren02K21, Ren37H09, Ren37A11, Ren41D20, Ren39L15, Ren42N13, Ren44K10, Ren45F03, Ren04M22, Ren05C07, Ren13J22, Ren67C18, Ren48E01, Ren49C08, and Ren50B03.
Amplifications of DNA microsatellite loci from the bush dog were performed through a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Reactions were carried out in a final volume of 25 [micro]L and the amplification mixture consisted of 50 ng genomic DNA (10 ng [[micro]L.sup.-1]); 1.0 [micro]L each primer (10 [micro]M); 13.9 [micro]L autoclaved milli-Q water; 1.0 [micro]L Mg[Cl.sub.2] (50 mM); 0.5 [micro]L mM each dNTP (10 mM); 2.5 [micro]L PCR buffer 10X; and 0.1 [micro]L Taq DNA polymerase (5U [[micro].sup.L-1]) (Biotools). Thirty-five amplification cycles were performed and annealing temperatures were adjusted, according to each primer.
To verify whether the primer transfer occurred, samples of 5 bush dogs and 2 domestic dogs were tested as positive control. The amplified products were subjected to electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel, for 1 hour and 30 minutes at 100 V. The fragments were visualized by using ethidium bromide staining, and ultraviolet light exposure and photographed by Eagle Eye II (Stratagene).
The microsatellite locus polymorphism was analyzed in silver-stained denaturing polyacrylamide gel 6%. Electrophoresis was carried out at 1,300 V, for two hours.
The amplified product was sequenced with forward and reverse Ren39L15 primers, by using an ABI 377 model automated sequencer, and the kit ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit-Ampli Taq DNA Polymerase, FS (Perkin Elmer), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
From each specimen, 5 mL peripheral blood samples were collected into a sterile syringe heparinized with liquemine (Roche). To obtain metaphasic chromosomes, the technique developed by Moorhead et al. (1960), with modifications, was adopted. The best metaphases were photographed and documented for karyotyping of all the evaluated individuals.
Results and discussion
All 15 tested primers showed 100% transferability, and the sizes of the amplified DNA fragments from bush dog samples were similar to those described for canine genome. Among these, primers Ren37H09, Ren39L15, Ren42N13, Ren45F03, Ren41D20, Ren44K10, Ren02K21, and Ren37A11 were tested in 25 animals to verify genetic variability, and only the loci Ren44K10 and Ren41D20 showed to be polymorphic. The remaining primers were monomorphic.
The results suggest there is high homology between domestic and bush dog sequences flanking the microsatellite loci. Similar results regarding microsatellite transfer were obtained by Wilton et al. (1999), evaluating the transfer of 14 canine microsatellites in Australian dingoes (Canis dingo), and by Roy et al. (1994), who tested 10 canine microsatellites in 3 canid species (Canis lupus, Canis latrans and Canis rufus).
Considering the polymorphism, the results were different from those observed in the studies from Wilton et al. (1999) and Roy et al. (1994), in which 100% of the loci were polymorphic, because although the primers tested in the present study were polymorphic in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris), six were monomorphic in the analyzed animals.
Wilton et al. (1999) reported the presence of a smaller number of alleles per locus in the Australian dingo, relative to the dog. Klukowska et al. (2003) also found a higher polymorphism in dogs than in Arctic and red foxes. According to Klukowska et al. (2003), the high polymorphism in dogs is probably due to the different breeds, and the interbreeding among them. Girman et al. (2001) found a smaller number of alleles and lower heterozygosity in African wild dogs in captivity, compared with those of wildlife. For Rosseto (2001), similar PCR products should be carefully compared, since several factors can lead to homoplasy. For example, two products amplified in different species, but with the same size can include mutations, rearrangements and duplications in the regions flanking or at the microsatellite region. These variations interfere with the use of microsatellites in phylogenetic studies and sometimes can lead to erroneous data interpretation. In this study, the Ren39L15 locus was sequenced in order to confirm the presence of repeat regions. The electrophoretogram analysis indicated a (CA)17 microsatellite locus, two repeats exceeding the expected pattern for the domestic dog. Thus, although it is a microsatellite locus, this region was monomorphic in the analyzed animals.
Regarding the cytogenetic analysis, in 5 of the 34 analyzed specimens, chromosomal preparations could not be obtained, or the quality from the obtained ones was not suitable for analysis. High-quality metaphase preparations were obtained from 29 specimens, of which 23 presented the same autosomal chromosome group: 2n = 74, in which autosomal chromosomes are acrocentric, and gradually decrease in size from the 1st to the 36th pair. The size of the smallest autosomal was around 20% from that of the first pair. In all specimens, the X chromosome is submetacentric, and its size is between the first and the second autosomal pair. The Y chromosome is acrocentric, and the smallest of the complement (Figure 1a).
Besides the chromosomal group above-described, two brother animals, from one of the analyzed Institution, evidenced a metacentric Y chromosome (Figure 1b), although it had been the smallest element of the karyotype complement. These were males' offspring of one female of wildlife from the native forest of Mato Grosso State (the coordinates of the capture area were not specified), and were found in the backyard of a house. Such specimens died (parasitosis) some months after the collection of the material for cytogenetic analyses, which made impossible further collections and the establishment of the chromosomal differentiation (chromosomal inversion, translocation) origin.
Chromosomally, the Canidae family is characterized by including species with a large number of acrocentric chromosomes (2n > 64), and others with a small number of metacentric ones (2n < 50) (WAYNE et al., 1987a and b). In all species, there is heteromorphism between X and Y chromosomes. About the polymorphism observed in Y chromosome, although these data indicate that further chromosomal analyses should be carried out in other specimens from the same region, the hypothesis that populations early isolated from the others could have fixed their own chromosomal forms must be considered. These data must be especially considered in the formation of couples between specimens from different regions.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
South American canids present as karyotypic pattern, many and small acrocentric chromosomes, whose numbering is difficult, as well the identification of homologous pairs. Their karyotype is very similar to that of the grey wolf (Canis lupus), and the latter is regarded as the oldest species, ancestor of the remaining ones. If we consider the Canis lupus a karyotype basal for the family, the chromosomal rearrangements that occurred over the group evolution can be suggested. According to Wayne et al. (1987a and b), Chrysocyon brachyurus (2n = 76), that is considered the oldest South American canid, lost the autosomal pair number 28 in comparison to Speothos venaticus (2n = 74). Comparisons of C. brachyurus and Canis lupus (2n = 78) also evidence that the first species lost the chromosome pairs numbers 28 and 22. Similarly to Speothos venaticus, the karyotype of Cerdocyon thous (2n = 74), compared to the one of C. lupus, does not present the autosomal pairs 22 and 28, which suggest a chromosomal loss or translocation to other chromosome during speciation. C. lupus seems to be the direct ancestor of C. lupus, based on the loss or incorporation of the autosomal pair 28. This chromosomal loss/incorporation process continued in the remaining South American canids, relative to the autosomal pair 22. Hatanaka et al. (1998) observed a different karyotype on Cerdocyon thous, compared to other canids so far studied, as it presented a higher proportion of meta and submetacentric chromosomes and the highest fundamental number of the Canidae family (NF = 106). Moreover, a high proportion of heterochromatin was observed, a feature that can be seen as an important tendency to the stabilization of neo-established chromosomes that were originated by chromosomal fissions.
Of the 29 specimens, from which we obtained high-quality chromosome preparations, one female presented mosaicism. This female, which is kept by an Institution in Sao Paulo State, was not as prolific as the females kept by other Institutions; however, it had already reproduced, but none of its descendants survived. In this specimen, cells of 2n = 74, XX (Figure 2a); 2n = 73, X0; 2n = 75, XXX; 2n = 76, XXX (Figure 2b) and 2n = 78, XXX (Figure 2c) were identified.
To rule out the possibility that the observed mosaicism was due to the action of a drug and/or agent with which the specimen had contact, or the result of a factor during metaphasic cell formation in vitro, a new collection was performed approximately one year and a half after the first visit to the Institutions. In this occasion, samples were collected from another specimen kept by the same Institution, and which had no relationship with that female. The same cytogenetic results were obtained, characterizing the constitutional mosaicism of the studied female.
Although the mosaicism had been detected in blood cells, the possibility of its extension to other tissues must be considered. In this case, it may be one of the factors responsible for the specimen low prolificacy, due to the formation of chromosomally unbalanced gametes that are not viable to produce a zygote of normal development.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
The genetic evaluation of wild animals kept in captivity provides data that can assist with the exchange practice between different institutions, avoiding problems in the reproductive capacity of the breeding stock.
The microsatellites of the domestic dog were not efficient for genetic analysis in Speothos venaticus and, therefore, it would be necessary to develop species-specific primers, in order to evaluate the genetic diversity of the bush dog.
The cytogenetic analysis leads to the detection of polymorphism, and the obtained data can support breeding practices of captive animals.
The authors thank the Fundacao para o Desenvolvimento da Unesp (Fundunesp), for financial support.
Received on March 27, 2009.
Accepted on July 16, 2009.
BRUM-ZORRILLA, N.; LANGGUTH, A. Karyotype of South American pampas fox Pseudalopex gymnocercus (Carnivora: Canidae). Experientia, v. 36, n. 9, p. 1043-1044, 1980.
GIRMAN, D. J.; VILA, C.; GEFFEN, E.; CREEL, S.; MILLS, M. G. L.; MCNUTT, J. W.; GINSBERG, J.; KAT, P. W.; MAMIYA, K. H.; WAYNE, R. K. Patterns of population subdivision, gene flow and genetic variability in the african wild dog (Lycaon pictus). Molecular Ecology, v. 10, n. 7, p. 1703-1723, 2001.
HATANAKA, T.; TAMBASCO, A. J.; GALETTI JR., P. M. Heterochromatin heterogeneity and chromosome heteromorphism in Cerdocyon thous (Mammalia: Canidae). Genetics and Molecular Biology, v. 21, n. 2, p. 227-231, 1998.
JOUQUAND, S.; PRIAT, C.; HITTE, C.; LACHAUME, P.; ANDRE, C.; GALIBERT, F. Identification and characterization of a set 100 tri- and dinucleotide microsatellites in the canine genome. Animal Genetics, v. 31, n. 4, p. 266-272, 2000.
KLUKOWSKA, J.; STRABEL, T.; MACKOWSKI, M.; SWITONSKI, M. Microsatellite polymorphism and genetic distances between the dog, red fox and artic fox. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, v. 120, n. 2, p. 88-94, 2003.
MOORHEAD, P. S.; NOWELL, P. C.; MELLMAN, W. J.; BATTIPS, D. M.; HUNGERFORD, D. A. Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human blood. Experimental Cell Research, v. 20, n. 3, p. 613-616, 1960.
NOWAK, R. M. Walker's mammals of the world. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999. v. 1.
PIENKOWSKA, A.; SWITONSKI, M. Chromosomal localization and activity of nucleolar organizer regions in the dog (Canis familiaris). Genetics Selection Evolution, v. 30, n. 1, p. 79-84, 1998.
ROSSETO, M. Sourcing of SSR markers from related plant species. In: HENRY, R. J. (Ed.). Plant genotyping: the DNA fingerprinting of plants. Wallingford: CAB International, 2001. p. 211-224.
ROY, M. S.; GEFFEN, E.; SMITH, D.; OSTRANDER, E. A.; WAYNE, R. K. Patterns of differentiation and hybridization in North American wolflike canids, revealed by analysis of microsatellite loci. Molecular Biology and Evolution, v. 11, n. 4, p. 553-570, 1994.
WAYNE, R. K.; NASH, W. G.; O'BRIEN, S. J. Chromosomal evolution of the Canidae. I. Species with high diploid numbers. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, v. 44, n. 2-3, p. 123-133, 1987a.
WAYNE, R. K.; NASH, W. G.; O'BRIEN, S. J. Chromosomal evolution of the Canidae. II Divergence from the primitive carnivore karyotype. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, v. 44, n. 2-3, p. 134-141, 1987b.
WILTON, A. N.; STEWARD, D. J.; ZAFIRIS, K. Microsatellite variation in the australian dingo. Journal of Heredity, v. 90, n. 1, p. 108-111, 1999.
Thais de Lima Carvalho (1), Rogerio Abdallah Curi (2), Valquiria Santiloni (1), Cleyde Angelica Ferreira da Silva Chieregatto (3), Guaracy Tadeu Rocha (1) and Ligia Souza Lima Silveira da Mota (1) *
(1) Departamento de Genetica, Instituto de Biociencias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Distrito de Rubiao Junior, s/n, 18618-970, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil. (2) Departamento de Melhoramento e Nutricao Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil. (3) Plano de Manejo do Cachorro Vinagre, Sociedade de Zoologicos do Brazil, Bauru, Sao Paulo, Brazil. * Author for correspondence. E-mail: email@example.com
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||texto en ingles|
|Author:||de Lima Carvalho, Thais; Abdallah Curi, Rogerio; Santiloni, Valquiria; Ferreira da Silva Chieregatto|
|Publication:||Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences (UEM)|
|Date:||Oct 1, 2010|
|Previous Article:||Composicao e riqueza de especies de protozoarios flagelados de ambientes associados ao rio Baia (Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil): influencia do periodo...|
|Next Article:||Morte celular induzida pelo tamoxifeno em linfocitos humanos cultivados in vitro.|