Capital and the Common Good.
Georgia Levenson Keohane
New York: Columbia University Press, 2016 (248 pages)
Georgia Levinson Keohane's Capital and the Common Good is an excellent survey of recent developments in "innovative finance," and a text that provides important foundational research for scholars seeking to explore the integration of ethics and economics in the realm of finance. Her work surveys examples of situations where the invisible hand fails, so that economists, governments, and private firms need to deploy "a creative and 'visible' hand--that corrects the market failure and provides for the public good" (2). Keohane's examples of innovative finance are best interpreted as responses to market failures arising from the belief that because "markets are constructs, shaped by laws and customs" (3), market failure can be fixed. Keohane's five chapters treat the application of innovative finance to environmental issues and natural resource management, healthcare markets, capital markets, risk and disaster insurance markets, and domestic markets in the United States, respectively.
The book is filled with concrete examples of innovative finance in response to market failure. For example, in her treatment of the "new disaster finance," Keohane explores the African Risk Capacity (ARC), a subset of the African Union (AU) that is designed to address the market failure of moral hazard (124-29). In a global economic system where natural disasters are often met with relief funds from the international donor community, local governments are tempted to not invest their own resources in disaster management but instead to rely on help from international organizations and NGOs. This situation makes organizations such as the World Food Program essentially a global insurer against drought and famine. Thus, economists were able to develop an innovative solution to moral hazard by introducing pooled portfolio risk into the AU. Using modern weather data to model risk, ARC diversifies weather risk across the African continent and allows countries to purchase drought insurance at a much cheaper rate than would be possible without pooling. Participation in ARC also requires that countries implement rapid response measurements that allow for "early warnings, early payouts, and early interventions" that save both lives and money (127). By 2020, the Extreme Climate Facility will securitize the entire process by offering climate change catastrophe bonds. African Risk Capacity is thus a case of innovative finance as it tackles global issues, like famine, through creative applications of financial theory to tackle market failures--a benevolent visible hand.
Keohane surveys a number of other responses to other market failures, both formal failures addressed in economic theory and more informal failures recognizable to the general public. So, for example, in the United States the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is an effort to offer refunds above owed amounts in taxes for the poorest working families. This program faces the market failure of information asymmetry: those families that most need programs like EITC may not know that such programs exist. Therefore, innovative financial institutions such as Single Stop USA have worked to connect over one million households with government services where each dollar spent by clients results in an average of twenty dollars in benefits received (160). Keohane discusses "market shapers" such as prizes and challenges used to spark innovation in developing products in markets that companies, investors, or individual researchers might otherwise neglect because they concern nonexcludable public goods (68). Microfmance efforts in the developing world attempt to overcome high transaction costs (chap. 3), and earmarked microlevies--small taxes designed not to deter demand--placed on natural resources sales may ensure that resource-rich nations with corrupt governments may still receive some benefit from natural resources extracted by foreign forms (61).
As she surveys innovative approaches to finance, Keohane emphasizes the "TIES that bind" by exploring issues of time, incentives, execution, and success. One of the major successes of innovative finance is that it allows us to leverage future savings that arise from early interventions to pay for such interventions now (181-82). Innovative finance ultimately attempts to develop incentives that drive investors, firms, governments, and organizations to act in ways that benefit society long term (183). Keohane particularly emphasizes pay-for-success programs in financial instruments such as social-impact bonds that only pay out to the holder in the event that the program produces measurable results from the money sponsored (163-65). The execution of new financial programs often requires both "human interaction" rooted in trust and technological advancements such as pay-as-you-go mobile banking (189-90). Finally, the success of innovative finance is often plagued by what Keohane calls the quantity versus quality dilemma: when such instruments are successful and yield a profit, an increase in the supply of such funds may undercut the success of the instrument by targeting beneficiaries that are neither economically nor socially ideal (191). In essence, we must be wary of innovative finance bubbles.
Keohane's work should be of interest to those who explore the intersection of finance and ethics, but her work is largely descriptive and rarely normative--she offers little in the way of guidance as to how such innovative financial instruments and organizations should be used. Nevertheless, the book's material offers ample fodder for the discussion of economic ethics and the theology of economics. Considering how subsidiarity applies to the examples surveyed is potentially fruitful. Keohane is quick to argue that deploying a visible hand "does not necessarily mean direct government regulation or intervention" (3), and she provides examples of community-driven innovative finance such as catch-share policies for fishing communities (33). However, the work as a whole tends toward solutions rooted in organizations such as the World Bank and the World Health Organization, or in direct government intervention, often in the form of "public-private partnerships" (193). Christian economic ethics can offer a more thorough analysis of when innovative finance should be deployed on local levels and when such national and international agents are required for success. Similarly, where Keohane addresses how noted economists such as Muhhamad Yunus claim that "the profit motive... necessarily compromises the integrity of microcredit" (a textbook example of the quantity versus quality problem), the theology of economics can offer insights into how such motives and desires can be disciplined and restrained to help overcome the negative results of sacrificing quality for quantity and profits. On the other hand, theologians who are often prone to denounce capitalism in its entirety will benefit from the numerous examples that Keohane provides to show how the market mechanism can result in more just or more benevolent outcomes with only small interventions to overcome market failures. Here Keohane shows that the right sort of capitalism can be deployed to ethical ends.
Filled with clear examples and case studies, Capital and the Common Good is a superior introduction to the world of innovative finance. Keohane's attention to technology and financial theory balanced with a summary of challenges that each strategy faces results in a well-rounded treatment of the subject. It offers much for theologians, ethicists, and economists to consider.
--D. Glenn Butner, Jr. Sterling College, Kansas
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||ETHICS AND ECONOMICS|
|Author:||Butner, D. Glenn|
|Publication:||Journal of Markets & Morality|
|Article Type:||Book review|
|Date:||Mar 22, 2017|
|Previous Article:||The Market as God.|
|Next Article:||Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy.|