Printer Friendly

Cannes Film Festival. (Festival Wraps).

CANNES, FRANCE (5/15-26/02)

Later, when I am alone, I will say to myself: Welcome to Cannes.

One night on the rue d'Antibes, I am approached by a young man speaking an odd form of French. In my own odd form of French I tell him I'm not interested. He keeps talking, and then demonstrates for me a wrestling move where you defeat your opponent by putting one leg between his two and pull him down. Bewildered, then bemused, then angry, I tell him to back off. He does. A few moments later comes a tap on my shoulder. As I turn around, he calmly hands back my wallet. My meager evening's cash is now in his hands, but all my credit cards and identification are untouched, returned by his own nimble fingers. As he recedes into the night, I smile at him. He smiles back. Upon reflection, I don't even feel like the rube I am, the Cannes rookie who had his pocket picked. Instead, I think that this young, skilled thief is honourable. Then I think that his surprisingly ethical gesture suggests that there is hope in a world wracked by political entropy, disease, poverty and violence.

Enveloped as I am in this warm Mediterranean resort by affluent narcissism, suntanned superciliousness, phantasmagoric preening, pulchritude real and injected, my modest hope is, of course, utterly tenuous. And yet, it is also tenacious. Indeed, the battle for hope--not hope itself, I hasten to add--informs many of the strong offerings at Cannes 2002, from the Official Competition to the Critic's Week to the industry--only screenings in the gargantuan maw that is the Market. As you make your way past the many security guards with metal detectors and very cursory bag searches--a rather half-hearted, almost Ionesco--inspired response to 9/11-you are confronted again and again with films that reveal the face of hopelessness but that refuse its barren totalities.

If the lineup of the Official Competition is any indication, Cannes demonstrated that despite everything there is a renewed strength in world cinema. This section featured new works by a who's who of contemporary international cinema: Kaurismaki, Kiarostami, Leigh, Loach, Bellochio, Oliveira, Sokurov, Moore, les freres Dardennes, Assayas and Polanski (whose Holocaust drama, The Pianist, won the Palme d'Or). The Director's Fortnight included films by Catherine Breillat, Werner Schroeter, D.A. Pennebaker and Chris Hegedus; the Critic's Week offered Ulrich Siedi's Dog Days, Barbet Schroeder's More and Emmanuelle Chiralese's moving Respiro Mia; Un Certain Regard featured affecting works from China, Algeria (especially Yamina Bashir's Rachida) and the ensemble film, Ten Minutes Older: The Trumpet, with contributions from Wim Wenders, Jim Jarmusch, Weiner Herzog, Chen Kaige, Spike Lee, Victor Erice and Aki Kaurismaki. Add the major-star power of Jack Nicholson, Martin Scorsese (who showed a 20-minute reel from Gang s of New York), Sharon Stone, Tilda Swinton, Woody Allen (whose senile Hollywood Ending opened the festival) and Charles Aznavour, and you have, by any standard, a memorable year.

Canada, too, had significant presence. David Cronenberg's well-regarded Spider was in Official Competition, as was Jesse Rosensweet's animated short, The Stone of Folly. Legendary Quebec actress Carole Laure's Les Fils de Marie was presented in the Critics Week. Perhaps most notably, Atom Egoyan's latest feature, Ararat, was presented in the Official Selection but out of competition. Egoyan felt that Ararat, which deals with the Armenian genocide in Turkey in 1915, should not be shown in competition because, "a whole other political process would then be imposed on what has already become a politicized film." Interestingly, Ararat's investigations of history, memory and conflict are echoed in many films at Cannes this year.

In this sense, three relatively modest films set in Jerusalem stand apart. In the context of that city now, each offers perceptive illuminations of and compelling cases against the end-game of hopelessness. In Official Competition, Palestinian director Elia Sulieman's Divine intervention (given a Special Jury Prize) revolves around Palestine lovers who live in Jerusalem and in Ramallah and who rendezvous at a checkpoint parking lot. It's a gallery of absurdist vignettes of hostility, misunderstanding and aggression in the Holy City. Its minimalist style (hints of Tati, Beckett and Keaton) conveys the thorny predicament of Israelis and Palestinians with power and, surprisingly, with humour. Hany Abu-Assad's equally engaging drama, Rana's Wedding, offers another examination of the lived reality of the tension of life in Jerusalem today. As Rana tries to prepare for her wedding, she encounters the banal and exceedingly dangerous unpredictability of life during wartime. More prosaic is Rashid Mashawari's Ticket T o Jerusalem It concerns an itinerant projectionist in the West Bank determined to show his films to the Palestinian community despite the chaos. In its humble way, Ticket To Jerusalem affirms the indomitability of humanity and the value of cinema in even the worst of circumstances.

Eight months after September 11, with Israelis and Palestinians in a renewed and horrific conflict, India and Pakistan on and off high alert, the rise of right-wing extremism in Europe, and the alarming, continuing spread of HIV, filmmakers managed to argue forcefully that there is some hope in our desperate days. At Cannes, there are thieves and charlatans, whores and artists; there is vanity, avarice and contempt; there is generosity, compassion and beauty; there is plenty to despise and plenty to admire. Ultimately, the 55th edition of this transient city of images, this carnival of commerce and celluloid with its promiscuous combinations of bazaar and boardroom, did deliver impressive and defiant films about the importance of cinema, the value of humanism and at least the possibility of finding a way through our dark labyrinth.

As I discovered in my inaugural visit to the Cote d'Azur, sometimes a tap on the shoulder can give you hope for humanity. Sometimes, as the Cannes Film Festival selections demonstrated more than once, the cinema affords us the same opportunity. Along the Croisette, as in most places these days, you take hope whenever and wherever you can find it.

Tom McSorley is the head of the Canadian Film Institute and a contributing editor to Take One.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Canadian Independent Film & Television Publishing Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:McSorley, Tom
Publication:Take One
Date:Sep 1, 2002
Words:1015
Previous Article:Bollywood North: an interview with Deepa Mehta.
Next Article:The Banff Television festival. (Festival Wraps).


Related Articles
It's now all biz, mate!
New channels for Venice's canals.
Cannes Murder, Movies at L.A. Screenings 2000.
CANNES: INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL (5/9 - 20/01).
Critical mass: CanWest and its critics.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters