Printer Friendly

Candida isolates from pregnant women and their antifungal susceptibility in a Malaysian tertiary-care hospital.

Byline: Siti Norbaya Masri, Sabariah Md Noor, Lailatul Akmar Mat Nor, Malina Osman and MM Rahman

: ABSTRACT

Objective: Pregnant women are susceptible to vaginal colonization and infection by yeast. The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of Candida spp in high vaginal swabs of pregnant women and their antifungal susceptibility.

Methods: High vaginal swab samples received from Serdang Hospital, Selangor, Malaysia during 2011 initially had microscopic examination, Gram-staining and fungal culture. These were finally confirmed by growth in chromogenic medium (CHROMagarCandida; Difco BBL, USA) and commercial biochemical identification kit (API 20C AUX; bioMACopyrightrieux, Lyon, France). Antifungal susceptibility was performed by E-test method. Results: Out of 1163 specimens 200 (17.2%) candida spp were confirmed from high vaginal swabs of pregnant women. Candida albicans (83.5%) is the most common species detected followed by Candida glabrata (16%) and Candida famata (0.05%). All C.albicans and C.famata isolates were susceptible to fluconazole while C.glabrata isolates were dose dependent susceptibility. First and second trimester, and diabetes were considered significant factors in patients for the vaginal candidiasis (p less than 0.001). Conclusions: In pregnant women, C. albicans was the frequently isolated yeast from high vaginal swabs.

Routine sc reening and treatment are important of pregnant women regardless of symptoms.

KEY WORDS: Candidiasis, Pregnant women, High vaginal swab, Fluconazole, Susceptibility.

INTRODUCTION

Although ubiquitous in nature, Candida species can cause various infections from superficial to invasive form. Pregnant women have a two-fold increase in the prevalence of vaginal colonization by Candida species compared with non-pregnant women. This association is influenced by increased levels of circulating estrogens, deposition of glycogen and other substrates in the vagina during pregnancy.1 Vaginal candidiasis in pregnant women was reported to cause blood stream infections particularly in low birth weight and premature infants. Using molecular typing techniques, vertical transmission of C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata has been documented.2

In Malaysia, studies regarding the epidemiology of vaginal Candida infections in pregnancy are limited, with the majority being related to bloodstream infection.3

Fluconazole is antifungal drug effective against most of the Candida species, although different degrees of susceptibility among species have been described including that observed in Malaysia. The emergence of fluconazole resistance has been reported among C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis isolates from candidemic patients in Malaysia.4 Species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp from non- invasive infection is not routinely done at diagnostic microbiology laboratory in Malaysia, mainly due to limited resources and demand.

The new interpretive susceptibility criteria instituted by Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI5) that provides lower minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) break points for antifungal drugs probably change the susceptibility pattern. Hence it further justifies the need of providing local data on species distribution and antifungal susceptibility pattern of Candida. In this study, we determined the prevalence and risk factors associated with vaginal candidiasis in clinically symptomatic and asymptomatic cases of pregnant women in Serdang Hospital, Malaysia.

METHODS

This cross sectional study was conducted through January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011 at Serdang Hospital, Selangor, Malaysia. A total of 1163 high vaginal swabs (HVS) were collected from pregnant women who were attending to antenatal clinic or admitted to antenatal ward to the hospital. Patients data were obtained from hospital's computer information system. The following data were recorded: age, diabetic status, race and age of gestation.

Identification of Candida spp: Significant candidal growth was defined as presence of pure or predominant growth of Candida spp on fungal culture media from HVS. Isolates were identified to a species level using a chromogenic medium (CHROMagarCandida; Difco BBL, USA) as well as a commercial biochemical identification kit (API 20C AUX; bioMACopyrightrieux, Lyon, France).

Antifungal susceptibility: The in vitro activity of fluconazole was measured by the E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

The MIC values were read where the inhibition elapse intersected the strip which was interpreted as the lowest concentration at which 80% of the growth was inhibited.

Interpretative susceptibility criteria recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) were used to evaluate the susceptibilities of isolates.

RESULTS

Of 1163 HVS samples 200 (17.2%) candida isolates were positive during the study period. Candida albicans was the most commonly isolated species, accounting for 83.5% (167/200) of the total isolates, followed by Candida glabrata (16%; 32/200), and Candida famata (0.05%; 1/200)(Table-I).

Factors in relation to vaginal candidiasis in pregnant women (Table-II) shows that diabetes during pregnancy and stage of gestation are significantly associated (pless than 0.05). We found that diabetic individual is at higher risk of having vaginal candidiasis during pregnancy compared to non-diabetic individual. In addition, first and second trimester pregnant women were the higher risk of getting vaginal

Table-I: Recovery of Candida spp from high vaginal swabs of pregnant women.

###Total number of specimens###No. of positive###Species of candida###Frequency of each isolate###%

###1163200Candida albicans167 83.5

###Candida glabrata32 16

###Candida famata1 0.05

Table-II: Factors related to vaginal Candidiasis in pregnant women.

Factors###Description###Candida spp.###p###Prevalence ratio

###Positive N(%)###Negative N(%)###Total

Age Group###18-30###157(18.1%) 712(81.9%) 869 0.177###1.287

###greater than 30###43(14.6%) 251(85.4%)294

Stage of Gestation###1st and 2nd trimester###33(27.7%) 86(72.3%) 119 0.001###0.496

###3rd trimester###167(16%)###877(84%)###1044

Diabetic Status###Diabetic###41(40.2%) 61(59.8%) 102 less than 0.001###2.177

###Non-Diabetic###134(15.6%)727(84.4%) 861

Race###Malay###157(17.3%)751(82.7%) 908###0.873###1.031

###Non-Malay###43(16.9%) 212(83.1%)255

Table-III: MIC values and ranges (g/mL) of fluconazole against the isolates of Candida spp.

###Candida species (n)###Antifungal Agent###Mean MIC50 (g/mL)###Mean MIC90 (g/mL)###MIC range (g/mL)

###C. albicans (167) Fluconazole S = 0.317###S = 0.571###0.094 2.000

###C. glabrata (32) Fluconazole S-DD = 1.516 S-DD = 2.728 1.000 6.000

###C. famata (1)###Fluconazole NDND0.75

Candidiasis compared to the third trimester. There were no marked differences in results with respect to race and age during pregnancy.

MIC ranges and MIC50/90 values of fluconazole against all isolates are summarized (Table-III) The MIC50/MIC90 values of fluconazole against C.albicans were much lower than C.glabrata (0.317/0.571 vs 1.516/2.728g/mL). Our finding showed the highest MIC(6.0g/mL) was to C.glabrata. However, all Candida albicans recovered from high vaginal swab (HVS) were susceptible to fluconazole while C.glabrata showed susceptible dose-dependent. None of the isolates was resistant to fluconazole. Even though there were no species- specific MIC interpretive criteria for C.famata, the MIC result of 0.75 g/mL was too low; hence we conclude it as susceptible.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, the recovery rate of Candida spp from pregnant women was 17.2% with C.albicans being the most common species detected (83.5%), followed by C. glabrata (16%). Similarities were observed with previous reports on vaginal candida spp distribution in Malaysia where C. albicans and C. glabrata were found 70% and 15% respectively3 This finding is also consistent with reports by investigators from other countries, in which C.albicans and C.glabrata were the most common Candida species isolated in vaginal candidiasis.6

A study in Turkey reported that clinically and mycologically confirmed cases of vulvovaginal candidiasis were detected in 139 (37.4%) of 372 pregnant women.7 In one study, a higher prevalence of vaginal candidiasis in pregnant women where 53% of patients with clinical diagnostic candidiasis had culture-positive vaginal isolates.6 Our prevalence rate was relatively low, similar to that found in other studies.

There is an evidence that eradication of Candida in pregnancy may reduce the risk of spontaneous preterm birth who were treated for vaginal candidiasis8 though a study reported that vaginal candidiasis in pregnancy was not associated with preterm birth.9

A striking observation in this study is that non- albicans Candida (NAC) species was very much lower than C.albicans in vaginal candidiasis (16.5% vs 83.5%). In a series of 50 cases of candidemia in Malaysia showed that NAC species constituted 60% of all yeast isolates and the most prevalent NAC species was C.tropicalis.10 Similarly, in another report 55.3% of the isolates collected from patients with invasive candidiasis were NAC species with C.parapsilosis being the most common one.4 The investigators also observed that though C.albicans was the predominant species in pregnant women, but in case of immunocompromised patients 82% of isolates were non-albicans Candida species. It was observed that C.albicans was the predominant species for vaginal candidiasis while C. parapsilosis was the most prevalent organism isolated from blood cultures.11

The shift in distribution of candida species particularly in invasive infection may be associated with the widespread use of prophylactic or empirical antifungal therapy and the increase in number of immunocompromised hosts.

Majority of studies have reported that incidence of candidiasis increases with gestational age.12

In contrast, our study showed the risk of getting vaginal candidiasis is higher during the 1st-and 2nd trimester as compared to 3rd trimester. Parveen et al.13 reported that there was no significant association between vaginal candidiasis and trimester of pregnancy.

In the light of previous studies our result showed a significant association between diabetes and vaginal candidiasis in which of 143 diabetic patients, 41 had vaginal candidiasis during pregnancy (pless than 0.001). In contrast, other authors noted that diabetes, or impaired glucose tolerance during pregnancy was not associated with vaginal candidiasis.14 In a study it was observed that women with diabetes experienced significantly higher isolation rate of both C.albicans and non-albicans Candida compared to non-diabetics.15 In addition to diabetes, the susceptibility to candidiasis in pregnant women is much higher due to hormonal changes during pregnancy.

There is an evidence to suggest that screening for and eradication of candida during pregnancy may reduce the risk of preterm delivery. In a large Austrian randomized controlled trial, spontaneous preterm birth occurred in 8/289 women treated for candidiasis versus 22/291 women with candidiasis in the control group (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.84 P=0.009).16

In this study, all C.albicans isolates were susceptible to fluconazole. Study conducted in United States and Brazil were also found that all C. albicans vaginal isolates were susceptible to fluconazole.17 However, although a report showed that 13.5% of isolates were resistant to fluconazole in Candida albicans vulvovaginitis.18

According to CLSI5 interpretive guideline, there is no susceptible MIC breakpoint for fluconazole against C.glabrata and MIC of less than 32g/mL is interpreted as susceptible dependent upon dose (S-DD), to indicate that dosage escalation may be required adequately to treat infections caused by isolates with a higher MICs.

In this study, C.glabrata isolates showed MIC range 1.00 g/mL 6.00g/mLand 90% of them had MIC = 2.728g/mL which is much lower than 32g/mL. This is in contrast to a study in Taiwan which reported a high fluconazole-resistant rate (64%) among C.glabrata from vaginal isolates.6

Our study showed that Candida glabrata had higher MIC50and90 than C. albicans. Candida glabrata is associated with drug resistance due to either over-expression of membrane ergosterol synthesis enzyme or the strains genetic modification.19 Inappropriate use of antifungal agents has led to the emergence of antifungal resistance.7 In the present study, although fluconazole showed good activity against all our isolates, the pattern could be changed with time as seen in other countries. Therefore, monitoring the activity of antifungal drugs is of concern particularly among pregnant women as the choice of treatment is limited by their side effects.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was financially supported by Fundamental Research Grant (01-03-11-987FR). The authors would like to thank the Director of the Hospital Serdang and the Director General of the Ministry of Health Malaysia for permission to conduct this study.

REFERENCES

1. Hay P, Czeizel AE. Asymptomatic Trichomonas and Candida colonization and pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaeco. 2007;l21:403409. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.02.002

2. Bliss JM, Basavegowda KP, Watson WJ, Sheikh AU, Ryan RM. Vertical and horizontal transmission of Candida albicans in very low birth weight infants using DNA fingerprinting techniques. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:231-235. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31815bb69d.

3. Chong PP, Lee YL, Tan BC, Ng KP. Genetic relatedness of candida strains isolated from women with vaginal candidiasis in Malaysia. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52(8):657-666.

4. Amran F, Aziz MN, Ibrahim HM, Atiqah NH, Parameswari S, Hafiza MR, et al. In vitro antifungal susceptibilities of Candida isolates from patients with invasive candidiasis in Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Malaysia. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60(9):1312-1316. doi: 10.1099/ jmm.0.027631-0

5. CLSI. 2012. http://Clsi.Org/Blog/2012/01/13/Clsi-Publishes- 2012-Antimicrobial-Susceptibility-Testing-Standards/ (Accessed on December, 12, 2014)

6. Tseng Y, Lee W, Kuo T. In-vitro susceptibility of fluconazole and amphotericin B against candida isolates from women with vaginal candidiasis in Taiwan. J Food Drug Anal. 2005;13(1):12-16.

7. Guzel AB, Ilkit M, Burgut R, Urunsak IF, Ozgunen FT. An evaluation of risk factors in pregnant women with candida vaginitis and the diagnostic value of simultaneous vaginal and rectal sampling. Mycopathologia. 2011;172(1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s11046-011-9392-z

8. Christine L R, Kristen R, George K, Jonathan MM. Treatment of asymptomatic vaginal candidiasis in pregnancy to prevent preterm birth: an open-label pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:18. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-18

9. Cotch MF, Hillier SL, Gibbs RS, Eschenbach DA. Epidemiology and outcomes associated with moderate to heavy Candida colonization during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:374380.

10. Tzar MN, Shamim AS. Candidaemia and Antifungal Susceptibility Testing in a Teaching Hospital. Med J Malaysia. 2009;64(1):61-64.

11. Ng KP, Madasamy M, Saw TL, Baki A, He J, Soo-Hoo TS. Candida biotypes isolated from clinical specimens in Malaysia. Mycopathologia. 1998;144(3):135-140.

12. Kikani KM, Joshi PJ, Mehta SJ, Kikani BA, Aring BJ, Kamothi MN. Species distribution and antifungal susceptibility pattern in the cases of vaginal candidiasis in Saurashtra region of Gujarat. Electronic J Pharmac Therap. 2010; 3:9-12

13. Parveen N, Munir AA, Din I, Majeed R. Frequency of vaginal candidiasis in pregnant women attending routine antenatal Clinic. J Colleg Phys Surg Pak. 2008;18(3):154157. doi: 03.2008/ JCPSP.154157.

14. Guzel AB, Ilkit M, Burgut R. An evaluation of risk factors in pregnant women with candida vaginitis and the diagnostic value of simultaneous vaginal and rectal sampling. Mycopathologia. 2011;172(1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s11046-011-9392-z.

15. Grigoriou O, Baka S, Makrakis E, Hassiakos D, Kapparos G, Kouskouni E. Prevalence of clinical vaginal candidiasis in a university hospital and possible risk factors. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;126(1):121-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.09.015

16. Kiss H, Petricevic L, Husslein P. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an infection screening programme to reduce the rate of preterm delivery. Br Med J. 2004;329:371376. doi: 10.1136/ bmj.38169.519653.EB

17. Sobel JD, Wiesenfeld HC, Martens M, Danna P, Hooton TM, Rompalo A. Maintenance of fluconazole therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(9):876-883.

18. Saporiti AM, Gomez D, Levalle S, Galeano M, Davel G, Vivot W. Vaginal candidiasis: Etiology and sensitivity profile to antifungal agents in clinical use. Rev Agent Microbio. 2001;33:217-222.

19. Niimi M, Nagai Y, Niimi K, Wada S, Cannon RD, Uehara Y, Monk BC. Identification of two proteins induced by exposure of the pathogenic fungus Candida glabrata to fluconazole. J Chromat Analyt Technolo Biomed Life Sci. 2002;782(1-2):245-252.
COPYRIGHT 2015 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Article Type:Medical condition overview
Geographic Code:9MALA
Date:Jun 30, 2015
Words:2652
Previous Article:Cognitive failure, teacher's rejection and interpersonal relationship anxiety in children with dyslexia.
Next Article:Expediting support for the pregnant mothers to obtain antenatal care at public health facilities in rural areas of Balochistan province, Pakistan.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |