Printer Friendly

Can pancreatic steatosis affect exocrine functions of pancreas?

INTRODUCTION

Ectopic accumulation of fat can be seen in a variety of non-adipose tissues, such as liver, heart, kidney, striated muscles, and pancreas (1). There are multiple studies regarding the steatosis of non-adipose tissues and its clinical effects. Although defined as early as in 1926 by Schaefer (2), studies about the pathophysiology and clinical importance of fat accumulation in the pancreas are limited.

Pancreatic fat accumulation is a general term used for pancreatic steatosis (PS), pancreatic lipomatosis, and fatty pancreas (3). PS is generally preferred over these terms. It is associated with advanced age; diabetes; hemochromatosis; viral hepatitis B; or congenital syndromes, such as Cystic Fibrosis or Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (4-8). Pancreatic fat accumulation is thought to be a negative prognostic factor in pancreatitis, and it is postulated to play a role in the etiology of pancreatic cancer (9). This hypothesis is based on the fact that liver and pancreas have similar embryological origins; hence, PS could act in a similar way in carcinogenesis as in the case of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (10). No relationship can be found between fatty infiltration of the pancreas and beta cell function (11).

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) can be defined as insufficient pancreatic enzyme activity due to insufficient enzyme production, insufficient enzyme activation, or premature enzyme destruction (12). A variety of conditions, such as chronic pancreatitis, celiac disease, pancreas cancer, surgery, and diabetes can cause EPI through different pathways (13). In theory, PS can affect the exocrine function of pancreas (14). However, to our knowledge, no study supporting this theory has been performed yet except for case reports (15-18). In a study performed by Terzin et al. (19), patients with type 2 diabetes were evaluated in terms of pancreatic exocrine function, and no relationship could be found between pancreatic volume and PS and impaired pancreatic exocrine function.

Theoretically, PS can impair pancreatic exocrine function by 3 mechanisms: lipotoxicity in the acinar cells, adipocyte-mediated negative paracrine effect, and direct destruction of the acinar cells (14). This study aimed to explore if the theoretical effect of PS on pancreatic exocrine function is important in clinical practice. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of EPI in PS. With this being the primary goal, we also aimed to determine the frequency of NAFLD in PS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

In total, 43 patients with PS and 48 without PS detected using a 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between 2014 and 2016 were included in this study. Patients were evaluated clinically and in terms of biochemical variables and fecal elastase-1 levels. Patients with chronic pancreatitis, chronic ethanol abuse, diabetes mellitus, gastric or pancreatic surgery history, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, and pancreatic atrophy in imaging tests were excluded.

Blood sampling and analyses

Venous blood samples were taken after an overnight fast for biochemical measurements. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), total cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and amylase and lipase levels were measured using commercially available assay kits (Roche Diagnostics GmbH; Mannheim, Germany) with an auto-analyzer (cobas 501 Roche-Hitachi; Germany).

Evaluation of PS and NAFLD

The presumed diagnosis of PS and NAFLD were evaluated using a 3-Tesla MRI machine (Skyra, Siemens; Erlangen, Germany) with multi-channel body coil. All patients were scanned in a supine position without pre-imaging preparation. Pregnant women and the patients with cardiac pacemaker/metallic implant or claustrophobia were excluded from the study. After 3-plane localizer images, coronal/axial T1- and T2-weighted (W) and three-dimensional (3D) Dixon images were obtained. Sequence parameters and details of the MRI protocol are presented in Table 1. The total imaging time for the 3 Tesla MRI was approximately 20 minutes.

Evaluation of MRI images

All of the MRI scans were transferred and evaluated using a Leonardo workstation (Siemens; Erlangen, Germany) by experienced radiologists (O.A.) who were blinded to the patient's clinical information, previous imaging data, and/or surgical findings. The evaluation and diagnosis of steatosis was performed by techniques previously described (20-23). The anatomical distribution of steatosis and localization of dominant steatosis, if present, was recorded in the steatosis group. For determining the severity of PS, the percentage steatosis area with respect to total pancreatic volume was measured using the T1W and T2W sequences and classified in a 3-point scale: Score 1: 0%-33% steatosis of the whole pancreatic tissue, Score 2: 34%-66% steatosis of the whole pancreatic tissue, Score 3: 67%-100% steatosis of whole pancreatic tissue. Figure 1 illustrates the an MRI scan of a patient with grade-3 steatosis.

Fecal elastase-1 assessment

Stool samples with solid consistency were collected and immediately stored at -80[degrees]C until further analysis. Fecal elastase-1 concentration of all samples were measured at the same time using the commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (BIOSERVE Diagnostics GmbH; Rostock, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All samples were thawed and then extracted overnight at 2-8[degrees]C using the extraction buffer provided in the kit. The basic principle of the test is a solid phase ELISA based on the double sandwich technique. The ELISA microplate is coated with antibodies directed against human pancreatic elastase binding the pancreatic elastase contained in the patient samples. Thereafter, the biotin-labeled secondary antibody, which binds to the immobilized pancreatic elastase, is added to the microplate. To visualize the bound pancreatic elastase, streptavidin-labeled horseradish-peroxidase is added. The peroxidase then oxidizes the substrate 3,3,5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB). The reaction is stopped by the addition of 0.25 mol/L [H.sub.2]S[O.sub.4]. Oxidized TMB can be measured photometrically at 450 nm. The intra and interassay variation coefficients of the test were 5.2% and 7.9%, respectively. Measurements were defined as [micro]g/g stool. Fecal elastase-1 levels >200 [micro]g/g were defined as normal, fecal elastase-1 levels <200 [micro]g/g were defined as EPI, with levels between 100 ve 200 [micro]g/g defined as mild EPI and <100 [micro]g/g defined as severe EPI (24).

Statistical analysis

The preliminary analyzes were completed for frequencies, mean, standard errors (SE), and percentages as applicable. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The statistical significance was set at P<0.05 for all analyzes. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA).

Written informed consent was obtained from patients who participated in this study. Ethics committee approval was received for this study from the ethics committee of the School of Medicine (Date: November 12, 2014, Approval Number: 193).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

Overall, 43 patients with PS and 48 without PS detected via 3 Tesla MRI were included in the study. Twelve patients were excluded from the PS group and 23 patients from the control group because of the aforementioned exclusion criteria. Therefore, the data of 31 patients with pancreatic fat accumulation and 25 controls were analyzed. Patients with PS were classified as group 1, and the control patients were classified as group 2. The percentage of female patients and the mean age of the patients (year[+ or -]SE of mean) in groups 1 and 2 were 43.7%, 65.96[+ or -]1.6 and 60%, 65.76[+ or -]1.6 respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of gender and mean age (p>0.05).

Biochemical parameters and fecal elastase-1

In both the groups, the mean FPG, triglyceride, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, AST, ALT, amylase, and lipase were similar (p>0.05). The mean fecal elastase-1 level was significantly lower in group 1 compared with that of group 2 (319.76[+ or -]45.7 vs 549.31[+ or -]69.4, respectively, p=0.003). The proportion of patients with EPI was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 (35.5% vs 12%, respectively, p=0.042). There were no differences regarding the severity of EPI (mild or moderate) between the groups (p=0.082; p=0.392), respectively (Table 2).

PS and NAFLD

The proportion of patients with NAFLD was not significantly different (p=0.436). In patients with PS, the percentage of those with NAFLD was not different irrespective of the presence of EPI (p=0.200). The severity of steatosis upon T1W and T2W sequences in PS patients did not differ between patients with or without EPI (p=0.198; p=0.405). In PS patients with or without EPI, the severity of steatosis on T1 sequences were not statistically different regarding scores 1, 2, or 3 (p=0.577; p=0.289; p=0.281), respectively. In PS patients with or without EPI, the severity of steatosis on T2 sequences are not statistically different regarding scores 1, 2, or 3 (p=0.284; p=0.537; p=0.573), respectively. PS was classified as diffuse, diffuse and head, body, tail, diffuse, and involving more than 2 areas according to anatomical distribution. In PS patients with or without EPI, there were no significant differences in the anatomic distribution of steatosis (p=0.645; p=0.490; p=0.254; p=0.409; p=0.645), respectively (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

Despite the important role in energy, metabolism studies about the fat accumulation in pancreas are limited (25). Studies about fat accumulation in the pancreas are mostly about imaging techniques and beta cell function. The net effect of pancreatic fat accumulation on the exocrine function of pancreas is unclear. This study shows that pancreatic fat accumulation can cause EPI.

As we excluded patients with disorders such as diabetes, which potentially cause EPI, our results show that PS may cause EPI independent of other causes.

Pancreatic fat accumulation can be named as pancreatic lipomatosis, PS, fatty replacement, fatty infiltration, fatty pancreas, lipomatous pseudohypertrophy, and nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease (NAFPD) (3). The term fat replacement defines death of pancreatic acinar cells with subsequent replacement with adipocytes. The term best defining the situation of fat accumulation without fat replacement is accepted to be PS (26). We preferred the term PS, as it is not currently known whether fat accumulation in the pancreas is reversible or causes acinar cell injury.

Studies about fat accumulation of pancreas have shown that the chance of steatosis increases with advancing age (27,28). Despite the fact that our PS patients were old, they were not older than those in the control group. Fat accumulation seen during the degeneration of pancreas is thought to be responsible for the increased prevalence of steatosis with advancing age (27).

Although a histologic examination remains the most sensitive way to detect pancreatic fat accumulation, its invasive nature limits its use. PS can be evaluated by imaging techniques, such as endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, or MRI. Despite endosonography being an invasive technique, it is quite sensitive for the evaluation of pancreatic pathologies such as chronic pancreatitis (29). The sensitivity of endosonography for the evaluation of PS should be explored further (30). MRI appears to be the most valuable noninvasive technique due to its high resolution, accuracy, and lack of ionizing radiation (28). Different techniques are defined in the determination of pancreatic fat. The MRI Dixon technique is a highly sensitive technique commonly used for fat quantification in the liver (31). Despite the fact that it is commonly employed for liver evaluation, studies evaluating the pancreas are limited (28). We diagnosed PS using a 3-tesla MRI, which also employed this technique.

Nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease defines the accumulation of fat associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome. NAFLD is postulated to be related to NAFPD (32). We could not detect any significant differences between PS and control groups. This may be due to NAFPD representing a different group among patients with PS.

Chronic ingestion of a diet rich in lipids by Zucker diabetic fatty rats has been shown to result in intralobar fat accumulation and increased lipid droplets in the acinar cells of the pancreas; these changes lead to acinar cell injury and fibrosis (33). Fat in pancreas is associated with adipocyte infiltration and altered lipid composition (34). Main lipids that accumulate in PS are triglycerides (35). Despite this observation, no significant correlation could be found between the amount of pancreatic fat and serum triglyceride levels (36). In our study, we could not find any significant correlation between serum triglyceride levels and PS consistent with literature.

Studies that have investigated the effect of PS on pancreas function mostly focused on the endocrine function of pancreas. There are conflicting results about the relationship of PS and beta cell function (37). In the study by Terzin V et al. (19), which evaluated exocrine function of pancreas in diabetics with poor glycemic control, PS was not correlated with fecal elastase-1 levels. In this study, PS was detected by abdominal ultrasonography, which is a subjective method (13). We found that EPI was significantly more common in PS patients. PS is thought to impair pancreatic exocrine function through lipotoxicity in acinar cells, adipocyte-mediated negative paracrine effect, and direct destruction of acinar cells (14). Lipids are long known to impair beta cell function (38). Same situation may be true for the pancreatic acinar cells. The absence of endocrine dysfunction in the PS group, while the exocrine dysfunction is evident, can imply that lipotoxicity may not be playing an important role. Lipid peroxidation of cellular membrane may be important in the free fatty acid-mediated pancreatic cellular injury (39). In PS patients, exocrine dysfunction may cause lipid accumulation eventually causing direct injury of the acinar cells. Adipocytes are capable of affecting multiple tissues through adipokines (40). Leptin, which is an adipokine, has been shown to inhibit pancreatic secretion (41). PS may cause adipokine-mediated dysfunction. In our study, the extent of steatosis rather than its severity has been significantly different in steatosis patients. Although the proposed mechanisms of exocrine dysfunction in PS are lipotoxicity in the acinar cells, adipocyte-mediated negative paracrine effect, and direct destructions of acinar cells, further studies are needed to clarify why it did not cause endocrine dysfunction.

There are certain limitations of our study: (1) Due to the broad exclusion criteria, the number of patients was low in both the groups. This may cause a statistical problem in subgroup analyzes for representation of the general population. (2) Fecal elastase-1 measurements used for diagnosis of EPI have high sensitivity for detection of severe EPI, while the sensitivity is significantly lower for mild EPI (42). This may affect the number of patients with EPI within the groups. (3) Although we excluded diabetic patients, our patients were not evaluated regarding prediabetes. Nevertheless, prediabetes has not been reported to cause EPI.

In conclusion, PS is a clinical entity with multiple unknown issues, both in description and in pathophysiology. Our study demonstrates that PS can cause EPI. Lipids are believed to act in different pathways on acinar cells causing exocrine dysfunction. Further studies are needed to determine the circumstances in which PS can cause EPI.

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval was received for this study from the ethics committee of Yildirim Beyazit University School of Medicine (Decision Date: 12 November 2014; Decision Number: 193).

Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from patients who participated in this study.

Author Contributions: Concept - M.T., T.K., O.E.; Design - O.A., O.E., M.T.; Supervision - M.T., O.E., T.K.; Materials - M.R.M., M.A., A.D.B.; Data Collection and/or Processing - M.A., M.R.M., A.D.B., O.A.; Analysis and/or Interpretation - H.K., M.R.M, A.D.B., M.A.; Literature Review - O.T.Y., H.K.; Writing Manuscript - O.T.Y., H.K., M.T., O.E.; Critical Review - O.T.Y., O.E., T.K.

Acknowledgements: The ELISA assay used for the detection of Fecal elastase-1 levels was supplied by the IMSED (Internal Medicine Post Graduation Education Society).

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

REFERENCES

(1.) Van Herpen NA, Schrauwen-Hinderling VB. Lipid accumulation in non-adipose tissue and lipotoxicity. Physiol Behav 2008; 94: 231-41. [CrossRef]

(2.) Schaefer JH. The normal weight of the pancreas in the adult human being: a biometric study. Anat Rec 1926; 32: 119-32. [CrossRef]

(3.) Smits MM, van Geenen EJ. The clinical significance of pancreatic steatosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 8: 169-77. [CrossRef]

(4.) Saisho Y, Butler AE, Meier JJ, et al. Pancreas volumes in humans from birth to age one hundred taking into account sex, obesity, and presence of type-2 diabetes. Clin Anat 2007; 20: 933-42. [CrossRef]

(5.) Lingvay I, Esser V, Legendre JL, et al. Noninvasive quantification of pancreatic fat in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 4070-6. [CrossRef]

(6.) Sasaki M, Nakanuma Y, Ando H.Lipomatous pseudohypertrophy of the pancreas in a patient with cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis B.Pathol Int 1998; 48: 566-8. [CrossRef]

(7.) Tham RT, Heyerman HG, Falke TH, et al. Cystic fibrosis: MR imaging of the pancreas. Radiology 1991; 179: 183-6. [CrossRef]

(8.) Cubuk M, Arslan G, Ceken K, et al. Schwachman-Diamond syndrome. A case report. Acta Radiol 2000; 41: 627-8. [CrossRef]

(9.) Tariq H, Nayudu S, Akella S, et al. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Pancreatic Disease: A Review of Literature. Gastroenterology Res 2016; 9: 87-91. [CrossRef]

(10.) Carter R, Mouralidarane A, Soeda J, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty pancreas disease pathogenesis: a role for developmental programming and altered circadian rhythms. PLoS One 2014; 9: e89505. [CrossRef]

(11.) Begovatz P, Koliaki C, Weber K, et al. Pancreatic adipose tissue infiltration, parenchymal steatosis and beta cell function in humans. Diabetologia 2015; 58: 1646-55. [CrossRef]

(12.) Keller J, Layer P.Human pancreatic exocrine response to nutrients in health and disease. Gut 2005; 54(Suppl 6): vi1-28. [CrossRef]

(13.) Pezzilli R, Andriulli A, Bassi C, et al. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in adults: a shared position statement of the Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 7930-46. [CrossRef]

(14.) Catanzaro R, Cuffari B, Italia A, et al. Exploring the metabolic syndrome: Nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 7660-75. [CrossRef]

(15.) Aubert A, Gornet JM, Hammel P, et al. Diffuse primary fat replacement of the pancreas: an unusual cause of steatorrhea. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2007; 31: 303-6. [CrossRef]

(16.) Ambesh P, Lal H. Pancreatic lipomatosis: Complete replacement of pancreas by fat. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: OL01. [CrossRef]

(17.) Khan NA, Amin MS, Islam MZ. Pancreatic lipomatosis with massive steatorrhea. Mymensingh Med J 2011; 20: 712-4.

(18.) Lozano M, Navarro S, Perez-Ayuso R, et al. Lipomatosis of the pancreas: an unusual cause of massive steatorrhea. Pancreas 1988; 3: 580-2. [CrossRef]

(19.) Terzin V, Varkonyi T, Szabolcs A, et al. Prevalence of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor glycemic control. Pancreatology 2014; 14: 356-60. [CrossRef]

(20.) Yoon JH, Lee JM, Lee KB, et al. Pancreatic Steatosis and Fibrosis: Quantitative Assessment with Preoperative Multiparametric MR Imaging. Radiology 2016; 279: 140-50. [CrossRef]

(21.) Begovatz P, Koliaki C, Weber K, et al. Pancreatic adipose tissue infiltration, parenchymal steatosis and beta cell function in humans. Diabetologia 2015; 58: 1646-55. [CrossRef]

(22.) Pokharel SS, Macura KJ, Kamel IR, Zaheer A. Current MR imaging lipid detection techniques for diagnosis of lesions in the abdomen and pelvis. Radiographics 2013; 33: 681-702. [CrossRef]

(23.) Kovanlikaya A, Mittelman SD, Ward A, Geffner ME, Dorey F, Gilsanz V. Obesity and fat quantification in lean tissues using three-point Dixon MR imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2005; 35: 601-7. [CrossRef]

(24.) Dominguez-Munoz JE, Hieronymus C, Sauerbruch T, et al. Fecal elastase test: evaluation of a new noninvasive pancreatic function test. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 1834-7.

(25.) Singh RG, Yoon HD, Wu LM, et al. Ectopic fat accumulation in the pancreas and its clinical relevance: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Metabolism 2017; 69: 1-13. [CrossRef]

(26.) Pezzilli R, Calculli L. Pancreatic steatosis: Is it related to either obesity or diabetes mellitus? World J Diabetes 2014; 5: 415-9. [CrossRef]

(27.) Wang CY, Ou HY, Chen MF, et al. Enigmatic ectopic fat: prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease and its associated factors in a Chinese population. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3: e000297. [CrossRef]

(28.) Dong Z, Luo Y, Cai H, et al. Noninvasive fat quantification of the liver and pancreas may provide potential biomarkers of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95: e3858. [CrossRef]

(29.) Catalano MF, Sahai A, Levy M, et al. EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: the Rosemont classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1251-61. [CrossRef]

(30.) Sepe PS, Ohri A, Sanaka S, et al. A prospective evaluation of fatty pancreas by using EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 987-93. [CrossRef]

(31.) D'Assignies G, Ruel M, Khiat A, et al. Noninvasive quantitation of human liver steatosis using magnetic resonance and bioassay methods. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 2033-40. [CrossRef]

(32.) Van Geenen EJ, Smits MM, Schreuder TC, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is related to nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease. Pancreas 2010; 39: 1185-90. [CrossRef]

(33.) Matsuda A, Makino N, Tozawa T, et al. Pancreatic fat accumulation, fibrosis, and acinar cell injury in the Zucker diabetic fatty rat fed a chronic high-fat diet. Pancreas 2014; 43: 735-43. [CrossRef]

(34.) Pinnick KE, Collins SC, Londos C, et al. Pancreatic ectopic fat is characterized by adipocyte infiltration and altered lipid composition. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16: 522-30. [CrossRef]

(35.) Durand S, Estival A, Vieu C, et al. Lipid content of human and rat pancreas. Pancreas 1987; 2: 326-32. [CrossRef]

(36.) Kuhn JP, Berthold F, Mayerle J, et al. Pancreatic Steatosis Demonstrated at MR Imaging in the General Population: Clinical Relevance. Radiology 2015; 276: 129-36. [CrossRef]

(37.) Ou HY, Wang CY, Yang YC, et al. The association between nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease and diabetes. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e62561. [CrossRef]

(38.) Giacca A, Xiao C, Oprescu AI, et al. Lipid-induced pancreatic [beta]-cell dysfunction: focus on in vivo studies. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2011; 300: E255-62. [CrossRef]

(39.) Morita Y, Yoshikawa T, Takeda S, et al. Involvement of lipid peroxidation in free fatty acid-induced isolated rat pancreatic acinar cell injury. Pancreas 1998; 17: 383-9. [CrossRef]

(40.) Rajala MW, Scherer PE. Minireview: The adipocyte-at the crossroads of energy homeostasis, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. Endocrinology 2003; 144: 3765-73. [CrossRef]

(41.) Matyjek R, Herzig KH, Kato S, et al. Exogenous leptin inhibits the secretion of pancreatic juice via a duodenal CCK1-vagal-dependent mechanism in anaesthetized rats. Regul Pept 2003; 114: 15-20.

[CrossRef]

(42.) Loser C, Mollgaard A, Folsch UR Faecal elastase 1: a novel, highly sensitive, and specific tubeless pancreatic function test. Gut 1996; 39: 580-6. [CrossRef]

Mustafa Tahtaci (1) [iD], Oktay Algin (2) [iD], Tarkan Karakan (3) [iD], Oyku Tayfur Yurekli (1) [iD], Murat Alisik (4) [iD], Huseyin Koseoglu (5) [iD], Melike Rusen Metin (2) [iD] Aylin Demirezer Bolat (5) [iD], Ozcan Erel (4) [iD], Osman Ersoy (1) [iD]

(1) Department of Gastroenterology, Yildirim Beyazit University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

(2) Department of Radiology, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

(3) Department of Gastroenterology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

(4) Department of Biochemistry, Yildirim Beyazit University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

(5) Department of Gastroenterology, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Cite this article as: Tahtaci M, Algin O, Karakan T, et al. Can pancreatic steatosis affect exocrine functions of pancreas? Turk J Gastroenterol 2018; 29: 588-94.

ORCID IDs of the authors: M.T. 0000-0003-4046-3715; O.A. 0000-0002-3877-8366; T.K. 0000-0003-1561-8789; O.T.Y. 0000-0002-1295-152X; M.A. 0000-0003-0434-3206; H.K. 0000-0002-2197-7473; M.R.M. 0000-0002-2341-4850; A.D.B. 0000-0003-4465-9977; O.E. 0000-0002-2996-3236; O.E. 0000-0002-1364-5962.

Corresponding Author: Mustafa Tahtaci; drtahtaci@gmail.com

Received: October 20, 2017 Accepted: March 15, 2018 Available online date: June 25, 2018

DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17696
Table 1. 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging protocol used for the study

Sequences/ Parameters     T1-VIBE     T2-HASTE   T1-VIBE-DIXON

TR/TE (ms)                4/1.74       1000/99     4.21/1.34
TR/TE (ms)                4/1.74       1000/99     4.21/1.34
Fat-saturation               +            +            -
Slice thickness (mm)        2.2           5           1.5
FOV (mm)                    400          400          450
Acquisition time (min)     0.13         0.38         0.14
NEX                          1            1            1
Number of slices            64           26           96
Flip angle ([degrees])       -           139           9
Distance factor (%)         20           10           20
PAT factor                   3            3            6
Voxel size (mm)         1.3x1.3x2.2   1.2x1.3x4   1.4x1.4x1.5

Sequences/ Parameters   T2-HASTE

TR/TE (ms)               1000/95
TR/TE (ms)               1000/95
Fat-saturation              +
Slice thickness (mm)        5
FOV (mm)                   380
Acquisition time (min)    0.56
NEX                         1
Number of slices           38
Flip angle ([degrees])      -
Distance factor (%)        20
PAT factor                  2
Voxel size (mm)         1.2x1.2x5

TE: echo time; TR: repetition time; VIBE: volumetric interpolated
breath-hold examination; HASTE: half-fourier-acquisition single-shot
turbo spinecho; FOV: field of view; NEX: number of excitations; PAT:
parallel acquisition technique

Table 2. Comparison of demographic, biochemical, and Magnetic
resonance imaging characteristics with PS patients and the control group

                           PS (n=31)            Controls (n=25)

Female/male                    14/17                  15/10
Age (years)                 65.96[+ or -]1.6     65.76[+ or -]1.6
FPG (mg/dL)                 97.70[+ or -]3.34    98.08[+ or -]3.45
LDL (mg/dL)                112.5[+ or -]5.3     124.73[+ or -]6.7
HDL (mg/dL)                 50.69[+ or -]2.74    51.16[+ or -]3.3
Triglyceride (mg/dL)       127.72[+ or -]10.17  143.72[+ or -]11.6
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)  189.29[+ or -]7.56   202.88[+ or -]8.6
AST (U/L)                   22.61[+ or -]2.41    20.32[+ or -]0.8
A LT (U/L)                  24.45[+ or -]3.63    21.4[+ or -]1.4
Fecal elastase-1           319.76[+ or -]45.7   549.31[+ or -]69.4
Total EPI n (%)             11(35.5)              3(12)
Mild EPI n (%)               8(25.8)              2(8)
Severe EPI n (%)             3(9.7)               1(4)
NAFLD n (%)                 18(58.1)             11(44)

                             p

Female/male                0.403
Age (years)                0.843
FPG (mg/dL)                0.824
LDL (mg/dL)                0.076
HDL (mg/dL)                0.650
Triglyceride (mg/dL)       0.269
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)  0.119
AST (U/L)                  0.503
A LT (U/L)                 0.443
Fecal elastase-1           0.003
Total EPI n (%)            0.042
Mild EPI n (%)             0.082
Severe EPI n (%)           0.392
NAFLD n (%)                0.436

Parameters were expressed as mean with standard error; the bold values
indicate that there was a significant difference
FPG: fasting plasma glucose; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; HDL:
high-density lipoprotein; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT:
Alanine aminotransferase; EPI: Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency;
NAFLD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; PS: pancreatic steatosis

Table 3. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings of PS
patients according to EPI status

                                     PS (n=31)  Controls (n=25)    p

Steatosis scoring with T1W n (%)
Score 1                              7 (63.6)     12 (60)        0.577
Score 2                              2 (18.2)     7 (35)         0.289
Score 3                              2 (18.2)     1 (5)          0.281
Steatosis scoring with T2W n (%)
Score 1                              1 (9.1)      5 (25)         0.284
Score 2                              7 (63.6)     9 (45)         0.537
Score 3                              3 (27.3)     6 (30)         0.573
Anatomical distribution of steatosis n (%)
Diffuse                              11 (100)     19 (95)        0.645
Diffuse and Head                     3 (27.3)     7 (35)         0.490
Body                                 0(0)         3 (15)         0.254
Tail                                 0(0)         2 (10)         0.409
Diffuse and more than 2              0(0)         1 (5)          0.645
NAFLD n (%)                          8 (72.7)     10 (50)        0.200

Parameters were expressed as n (%)
T1W: T1 weighted; T2W: T2 weighted; NAFLD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver
disease; PS: pancreatic steatosis; EPI: exocrine pancreatic
insufficiency
COPYRIGHT 2018 AVES
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Author:Tahtaci, Mustafa; Algin, Oktay; Karakan, Tarkan; Yurekli, Oyku Tayfur; Alisik, Murat; Koseoglu, Huse
Publication:The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology
Date:Sep 1, 2018
Words:4590
Previous Article:Do bad habits bring a double constipation risk?
Next Article:Prevalence of celiac disease among school-age children in Corum, Turkey.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters