Printer Friendly

Campaign contributions.

We need a rule or statute that requires lawyers who individually have played, or are members of firms which have played, a significant role in a judicial candidate's campaign, to disclose that fact to the opposing party in litigation and to the public.

Bundler lawyers or firms have great influence with campaigning judicial candidates who become or are sitting judges. The public has a right to expect an even playing field of disclosure. The Bar, the Supreme Court of Florida, or the Legislature have a duty to require at least full transparency of the spiraling amounts of money raised by trial lawyers and afloat in judicial campaigns.

While individual contributions are required to be disclosed, the real influence is an important secret only known to the bundlers and the candidates.

Since the Supreme Court of Florida has consistently approved an ad hoc threshold test for contribution recusal, it has a duty to clean up this obvious method of circumvention.

Thomas R. Spencer

Miami

COPYRIGHT 2015 Florida Bar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Letters
Author:Spencer, Thomas R.
Publication:Florida Bar News
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Geographic Code:1U5FL
Date:Nov 15, 2015
Words:163
Previous Article:Middle District pro se portal up and running.
Next Article:Clerk Funding.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters