California may consider proposition 65 reforms. (Regulations).
Representatives for the Attorney General commented on the importance of adopting regulations that require "a reasonable and meritorious case for private action."
At the same time, the regulations should require "not only documentation of exposure to a listed chemical, but a reasonable basis for concluding that the entire action has merit."
Proposed regulations were reviewed by Deputy Attorney General Edward Weil and Chief Assistant Attorney General Richard Frank.
Currently underway are two significant rule-making proceedings affecting Prop. 65, dealing with reporting requirements for private enforcement of the proposition, establishing binding requirements for the certificate of merit to be filed by private litigants and establishing roles for the review of settlements in Prop. 65 cases.
CTFA vice president-legal and general counsel Tom Donegan, who served as part of all industry panel, praised the reform efforts but said officials should take even stronger action to prevent frivilous lawsuits.
In his comments, Mr. Donegan urged California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to further strengthen the protection of its procedures for obtaining a safe use determination.
He also commented that he supports the Attorney General's efforts toward "bringing common sense and good science to the enforcement process."
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Household & Personal Products Industry|
|Date:||May 1, 2002|
|Previous Article:||Eastman to integrate e-business and expand. (The 'Net Works).|
|Next Article:||ShuiSense brings Feng Shui to the fragrance counter. (Marketing News).|
|Fears of California labeling nightmare may be unfounded when it comes to food.|
|Regulatory Reform Urged for Prop. 65.|
|Food labeling bill still under consideration by senate.|