Cadherin-17 and SATB2 Are Sensitive and Specific Immunomarkers for Medullary Carcinoma of the Large Intestine.
In molecular aspects, microsatellite instability (MSI) has been reported in approximately 80% of MC cases, with the majority of cases negative for both MLH1 and PMS2. (1, 3, 5, 8, 9) The evidence of MSI in MC is usually associated with a sporadic event rather than a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and is secondary to a promoter hypermethylation. (5) Other molecular findings in MC include lack of p53 overexpression, diploid DNA, and no evidence of adenomatous polyposis coli, deleted in colorectal cancer or b-catenin mutations. (1, 5, 9) In contrast, the mutations of these genes are identified in 80% of colorectal cancers, indicating a different molecular pathway of tumorigenesis involving MC. (1, 5, 9)
In regards to immunohistochemistry, only a limited number of reports are available. It has been well established that caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) is a highly sensitive immunomarker for gastrointestinal (GI) adenocarcinomas but may also be expressed in tumors from other organs, such as the pancreas, bile ducts, bladder, uterine cervix, endometrium, and ovary. (10-15) Marked reduction or loss of expression of cytokeratin 20 (CK20) and CDX2 is frequently seen in MC. (9, 16-19) Wick and colleagues (20) reported that multifocal positivity of neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin and chromogranin A) and focal p53 positivity were observed in 32% and 53% of MC cases, respectively. Winn et al (16) reported that a high percentage of MC cases were positive for mucin 1 (MUC1), mucin 2 (MUC2), and trefoil factor 3 (TFF3), indicating intestinal differentiation. Additionally, Winn et al (16) reported that 73% of MC cases were positive for calretinin, which can potentially be used as a diagnostic marker for MC. (16) To complicate this matter further, our experience and others' have demonstrated that a small percentage of MCs can be positive for cytokeratin-7 (CK7). (16, 21) As one can imagine, when an MC presents as a tumor of unknown primary, the pathologist may misinterpret it, based on its unusual histologic and immunophenotypic features, as another CK[7.sup.+] carcinoma, or as a mesothelioma because of CK7 and calretinin positivity; or the pathologist may simply exclude a colorectal primary because of the absence of CK20 and CDX2 expression. Therefore, there is a need to search for more sensitive and specific markers to confirm a diagnosis of MC of the large intestine.
Cadherin-17 (CDH17), also known as Li-cadherin (liverintestine cadherin), is a member of the cadherin superfamily and is a calcium-dependent transmembrane glycoprotein. (22-25) The main function of CDH17 is to mediate cellcell adhesion and to act as an intestinal peptide transporter. (22-25) CDH17 is expressed in normal glandular epithelium of the GI tract and normal pancreatic ducts. (25) A limited number of reports have demonstrated that CDH17 is a highly sensitive marker for GI adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine neoplasms. (24, 25) Panarelli et al (25) have also reported that CDH17 was a more sensitive marker than CDX2 in identification of GI adenocarcinomas and was observed in only a small percentage of adenocarcinomas of the lung, breast, ovary and endometrium. However, CDH17 expression in MC of the large intestine has not been reported in the literature.
Special AT-rich sequence binding protein 2 (SATB2) is another recently described marker that functions as a nuclear matrix-associated transcription factor and an epigenetic regulator. (26, 27) Magnusson and coworkers (27) have reported that SATB2 in combination with CK20 can identify more than 95% of all colorectal carcinomas. Upper GI carcinomas and pancreatic adenocarcinomas are usually negative for SATB2, and ovarian carcinomas and lung adenocarcinomas are positive for SATB2 with low frequency. (27) Therefore, SATB2 is a potential marker for identifying a carcinoma of colorectal origin when working on a tumor of unknown primary. (27) SATB2 expression in MC of the large intestine has not been reported in the literature.
In the present study, we investigated (1) the expression of CDH17 and SATB2 in MC of the large intestine; (2) the expression of other markers of intestinal differentiation such as CDX2, CK20, TFF3, villin, mucin 4 (MUC4), and amethylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR/P504S) in MC; (3) the expression of previously reported markers such as MSI markers, calretinin, and synaptophysin in MC; and (4) the expression of CDH17 and SATB2 in a large number of carcinomas and normal tissues from various organs, including some organs that have not been extensively studied in the literature, such as kidney, bladder, liver, endocervix, endometrium, thyroid, and ovary, to further test the diagnostic specificity of these 2 markers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Identification of MC Cases
The study was conducted with approval from the Institutional Review Board of Geisinger Health System. The pathologists at Geisinger began to use the terminology medullary carcinoma of the colon and rectum in early 2000. We searched the Geisinger surgical pathology files from the years 2000 through 2013 for resection specimens of colorectal carcinomas using the key words "adenocarcinoma/carcinoma, colon, resection," "medullary carcinoma," "poorly differentiated carcinoma with medullary features," and "undifferentiated carcinoma with medullary features," and 11-14 cases of colorectal carcinoma were identified. Among those cases, 18 (1.6%) were diagnosed as MCs or poorly differentiated/ undifferentiated carcinomas with medullary features. The hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides of the 18 MCs were rereviewed by 2 surgical pathologists. The clinical information for these 18 cases is summarized in Table 1.
Construction of Tissue Microarray Blocks
One thousand nine hundred forty-one cases of tumors and 358 cases of normal tissues from various organs dating from 2000 to 2013 were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Laboratory Medicine at Geisinger Medical Center. Multiple tissue microarray blocks with 2 punches of 0.75 or 1.0 mm each for each case were constructed as previously described. (28)
Immunohistochemical stains were performed on 18 MC cases on routine tissue sections and on 2299 tumors and normal tissues from various organs on tissue microarray slides using the previously published protocol. (28, 29) For the 18 MC cases, staining for MSI markers (MLH1, PMS2, mutS homolog 2 (MSH2), mutS homolog 6 (MSH6), CDH17, SATB2, CDX2, CK7, CK20, TFF3, MUC4, calretinin, P504S, villin, and synaptophysin were performed. CDH17 and SATB2 stains were also performed on the tissue microarray slides containing various tumors (n = 1941) and normal tissues (n = 358). Detailed information about the antibodies and staining conditions is summarized in Table 2. Appropriate positive control tissues were used for each of the above antibodies.
The staining intensity for both tumor cases and normal tissues was graded as weak, intermediate, or strong. In general, a strong signal can be easily seen with low-power magnification (X 2 or X 4), an intermediate signal can be observed with X 10 magnification, and a weak signal can be seen with high-power magnification (X20 or X40). The distribution was recorded as negative (<5% of tumor cells stained), 1+ (5%-25%), 2+ (26%-50%), 3+ (51%-75%), or 4+ (> 75%). Two surgical pathologists independently evaluated the immunostained slides. If a disagreement occurred, the 2 pathologists reviewed the case together and reached the final agreement. The interpretation was generally straightforward in this study. The results from the 2 pathologists were very compatible, with no significant disagreements.
Clinical and Histologic Features of 18 MCs
All 18 MC cases demonstrated classic histologic features, including solid sheets, nests, or trabeculae of intermediate to large polygonal tumor cells with high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio; vesicular nuclear chromatin and conspicuous to prominent nucleoli; amphophilic cytoplasm; pushing or focal infiltrating tumor border; dense peri- and intra-tumor cell lymphocytic infiltration; and minimal or no glandular formation. The ratio of women to men was 2.6:1. The mean age was 79.7, with a range from 52 to 91. The carcinomas were located in the cecum (n = 12; 67%), ascending colon (n = 5; 27%), and transverse colon (n = 1; 6%). The average tumor size was 8.5 cm, with a range from 3.5 to 15 cm. There were 8 cases of metastatic disease, including 6 cases in the regional lymph nodes, 1 case with liver metastasis (case 14), and 1 case with left-side colon/mesenteric metastasis (case 13). Clinical follow-up data could not be obtained in these cases. The detailed information for each case is summarized in Table 1.
Immunohistochemical Staining Results on 18 MCs
Fifteen of 18 MC cases (83%) demonstrated loss of expression of the MSI markers. Among these 15 cases, 14 showed loss of both MLH1 and PMS2, and 1 showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6. In all of the MSI cases, the adjacent normal colonic mucosa and internal control tissue (lymphoid cells and stromal cells) were strongly positive for all 4 MSI markers. The immunohistochemical staining results for MSI status of the 18 MC cases are summarized in Table 1.
Only 5 of 18 MC cases (25%) were focally positive (1+ or 2+) for CK20, and 12 of 18 cases were positive for CDX2 (67%). However, the CDX2 positivity tends to be focal (1+ or 2+) or weak staining. Strong CDX2 staining was only seen in 2 of 12 positively stained cases. In contrast, CDH17 was positive in 16 of 18 cases (89%) with diffuse (3+ or 4+) positivity in 75% of the cases. Similarly, SATB2 was positive in 16 of 18 cases (89%) with diffuse (3+ or 4+) positivity in 75% of the cases. The 2 CDH17-negative cases were positive for SATB2, and the 2 SATB2-negative cases were positive for CDH17. Nearly all CDH17-positive cases demonstrated a strong membranous staining, and the vast majority of SATB2-positive cases had a strong or intermediate nuclear staining.
Calretinin expression was observed in 12 of 18 cases (67%), with both nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. TFF3 was noted in 13 of 18 cases (72%), with cytoplasmic staining. The distribution seen in both calretinin and TFF3-positive cases was focal (1 to 2+), but the staining signal was strong in the majority of the cases. Focal (1+ or 2+) but strong cytoplasmic staining for MUC4 was seen in 13 of 18 cases (72%). Focal and weak cytoplasmic positivity for synaptophysin was noted in 3 cases (17%). Interestingly, 1 case (case 13) was diffusely and strongly positive for CK7 and negative for both CK20 and CDX2. This particular case presented with a large metastatic carcinoma in the left-side colon/mesentery 6 months after right-side colectomy. The histologic and immunostaining profile of the metastasis was identical to the primary tumor. Focal staining for p504S and villin was noted in a small percentage of cases. The detailed staining results for each case are summarized in Table 3.
Representative stains for case 16, cases 6 and case 15, and case 13 are shown in Figures 1, A through F; 2, A through F; and 3, A through D, respectively.
CDH17 Expression in 270 GI and Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas
CDH17 expression was seen in 123 of 125 cases (98%) of colorectal adenocarcinoma, with diffuse (3+ or 4+) and strong membranous staining in 94% of the cases. Twenty of 30 cases (67%) of esophageal adenocarcinoma were positive for CDH17, 2 cases with diffuse staining (3+). In contrast, positive staining for CDH17 was observed in only 25% and 18% of gastric and pancreatic adenocarcinomas, respectively. The detailed results are summarized in Table 4. Representative cases of adenocarcinoma of the colon, esophagus, and pancreas are shown in Figure 4, A through C.
CDH17 Expression in 1671 Non-GI/Nonpancreatic Tumors
The expression of CDH17 was observed in 55 of 1671 cases (3.3%) of non-GI and nonpancreatic tumors, including adenocarcinomas of the lung, endocervix, and endometrium, and rarely in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), prostatic adenocarcinomas, and urothelial carcinomas. Twenty-six of 198 lung adenocarcinomas were positive for CDH17, with diffuse staining (3+ or 4+) in 19% (5 of 26) of the cases. Fifteen of 55 cases of endocervical adenocarcinoma (27%) were positive for CDH17, with diffuse staining (3+ or 4+) in 40% (6 of 15) of the cases. The detailed staining results are summarized in Table 5. Representative cases of adenocarcinoma of the lung, endocervix, and endometrium are shown in Figure 4, D through F.
CDH17 Expression in 358 Cases of Normal Tissues
Colonic mucosa and duodenal mucosa were 100% positive for CDH17, with diffuse and strong staining in all cases. The mucosae of both gastric antrum and gastric body were negative for CDH17. Hepatocytes were negative for CDH17, but 3 of 28 cases showed CDH17 positivity in bile ducts. Other normal tissues tested in this study were all negative for CDH17. The results are summarized in Table 6.
SATB2 Expression in 270 GI/Pancreatic Tumors
Expression of SATB2 was seen in 121 of 125 cases (96.8%) of colorectal adenocarcinoma, with diffuse (3+ or 4+) and strong nuclear staining in 92 cases (76%). Nineteen cases showed weak nuclear staining. In contrast, SATB2 expression was observed in only 6.7%, 0%, and 4.2% of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus, stomach, and pancreas, respectively. The staining signal was weak in these cases, except in one case of pancreatic adenocarci noma with 4+ strong staining. The staining results are summarized in Table 7. Representative cases of adenocarcinomas of the colon and pancreas are shown in Figure 5, A and B.
SATB2 Expression in 1671 Non-GI/Nonpancreatic Tumors
The expression of SATB2 was observed in 60 of 1671 cases (3.6%) of non-GI and nonpancreatic tumors, including mainly lung adenocarcinomas, lung squamous cell carcinomas, and bladder urothelial carcinomas, and rarely renal cell carcinomas, endometrial adenocarcinomas, and angiosarcomas. Thirteen of 121 pulmonary squamous cell carcinomas showed weak nuclear staining for SATB2, with diffuse staining (3+ or 4+) in only 3 cases. Ten of the 43 cases of invasive urothelial carcinoma (23%) were positive for SATB2, with diffuse (3+ or 4+) and strong staining in 2 cases. The remaining 8 cases showed focal and weak nuclear staining. The detailed immunostaining results are summarized in Table 5. Representative cases of urothelial carcinoma and angiosarcoma are shown in Figure 5, C and D.
SATB2 Expression in 358 Cases of Normal Tissues
All cases of colonic mucosa (100%) were positive for SATB2, with diffuse and strong staining. In contrast, duodenal mucosa and ileal mucosa were negative for SATB2 in all cases. The mucosae of both gastric antrum and gastric body were negative for SATB2. Bile ducts and benign pancreatic ducts were negative for SATB2 as well. Three cases of seminal vesicles were focally (1+) and weakly positive for SATB2. Other normal tissues tested in this study were all negative for SATB2. The results are summarized in Table 6. Representative cases of normal colonic mucosa and normal small intestinal mucosa are shown in Figure 5, E and F.
Medullary carcinoma of the large intestine is a rare but distinct variant of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Our current study demonstrated that the incidence of MC was approximately 1.6% (18 of 1144 consecutive cases of colorectal adenocarcinoma). Clinical characteristics of these cases in the current study were very similar to those reported in the literature, in which a typical case presented in an elderly female with a large tumor in the right side of the colon. (1-9) More than 80% of MC cases in this study demonstrated evidence of MSI by loss of MLH1 and PMS2, with the exception of one case that showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6. No additional information on this case was available in regards to the possibility of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. These data were similar to reports in the literature. (8, 9, 16) Importantly, reduced or absent expression of CK20, which has been known to be associated with the finding of MSI status, was seen in 75% of cases. (9) There is no strong correlation between MSI and decreased CDX2 expression. (9) However, decreased CDX2 expression is also a frequent finding in MC. (9, 18) Expression of CDX2 was noted in 19% of the MC cases reported by Winn et al. (16) In the current study, CDX2 expression was seen in 67% (12 of 18) of MC cases. This percentage appeared to be much higher than that reported by Winn et al, (16) which may be attributed to using large routine tissue sections and counting focal and weak staining signal in the current study. However, only 5 of 18 cases (27%) demonstrated diffuse (3+ or 4+) and intense staining (strong or intermediate). The remaining positive cases showed only a focal and weak staining signal, which has limited utility in daily practice because a pathologist rarely interprets focal and weak staining as a true-positive result unless dealing with a predictive biomarker such as estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor.
Similar to the previous study by Winn et al, (16) our current study further confirmed their findings of the expression of calretinin and TFF3 in a significant percentage of MC cases. The positive staining for both calretinin and TFF3 tended to be focal (1+ or 2+) but very strong and easily seen at a low magnification. Therefore, both markers can be used as potential diagnostic markers. Another intestinal differentiation marker, MUC4, tested in this study was shown to be a useful marker as well; it was expressed in 72% of MC cases, with a focal but very intense staining signal. Two other markers, P504S and villin, demonstrated only focal and weak staining in a minority of cases. Expression of the neuroendocrine marker synaptophysin was observed in 17% of MC cases, with only focal staining (1+), which was in agreement with the report by Wick et al. (20)
Given the undifferentiated morphology and reduced or absent expression of both CK20 and CDX2 in these tumors, a diagnostic challenge can be encountered, especially when working on a tumor of unknown primary. To complicate this matter further, rare MC cases, such as case 13 in this study, can be positive for CK7 and negative for both CK20 and CDX2. Therefore, searching for more sensitive and specific markers is imperative. The 2 recently described immunomarkers CDH17 and SATB2 may potentially serve this purpose. In the current study, 89% of MC cases were positive for CDH17 and SATB2, respectively. Importantly, 2 CDH17-negative cases were both positive for SATB2, and 2 SATB2-negative cases were positive for CDH17. Therefore, CDH17 and SATB2 are complementary and, when used together, could identify all MC cases in this study. Taking these results together, a typical MC case has an immunohistochemical staining profile of CK[20.sup.-]/CDX[2.sup.-] or focally +/ MLH[1.sup.-]/PMS[2.sup.-]/CDH[17.sup.+]/SATB[2.sup.+]/calretinin focally +/MUC4 focally +/TFF3 focally +.
In addition to their utility in the diagnosis of MC of the large intestine, we also investigated CDH17 and SABT-2 expression in a large number of tumors and normal tissues from various organs. Our results indicated that SATB2 was a highly sensitive and specific marker for adenocarcinomas of the colon and rectum, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 97%
(121 of 125 cases) in colorectal carcinomas. Twelve of 125 colorectal carcinomas were poorly differentiated. All 4 SATB2-negative colorectal carcinomas (3 were poorly differentiated carcinomas) were positive for CDH17. In this study, SATB2 expression in MC was lower than that in nonMC colorectal adenocarcinomas (89% versus 97%), which was compatible with the observation of the down-regulation of SATB2 protein expression in poorly differentiated and metastatic colorectal adenocarcinomas. (26, 27) Only rare pancreatic adenocarcinomas and no adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and stomach were positive for SATB2, which was similar to the report by Magnusson et al. (27) We also confirmed that a small percentage of tumors, such as lung adenocarcinomas, lung squamous cell carcinomas, and bladder urothelial carcinomas, can be focally and weakly positive for SATB2, and found only rare cases of adenocarcinomas from the endometrium, ovary, and endocervix to be positive for SATB2. Magnusson et al (27) also reported that sinonasal carcinomas can be positive for SATB2, CK20, and CDX2. More recently, SATB2 expression was reported as a novel marker of osteoblastic differentiation of bone and soft tissue tumors. (30) Hence, caution should be taken, because there is little value in using SATB2 to differentiate a sarcomatoid carcinoma with bone metastasis from an osteogenic sarcoma. Additionally, expression of SATB2 was also noted in lymphoid cells in this study; one should be aware of this potential pitfall when interpreting a tumor with dense lymphoid infiltration such as MC. Preliminary data from this study also show that SATB2 was not expressed in large B-cell lymphomas. It is uncertain whether loss of SATB2 expression may play a role in the malignant transformation of lymphoid cells.
Furthermore, our unpublished data demonstrate that SATB2 was expressed in a majority of neuroendocrine tumors of the colon, rectum, and appendix but rarely in neuroendocrine tumors from the stomach, duodenum, small intestine, pancreas, and lung. Therefore, SATB2 can potentially be used as a specific marker to identify a neuroendocrine tumor of the lower GI tract. Li and coworkers (31) reported similar findings. Another interesting observation in this study is the lack of expression of SATB2 in normal duodenum and small intestine. In addition, the preliminary study on 4 cases of primary small bowel adenocarcinoma showed that 2 cases were negative for SATB2 and 2 cases showed focal and weak staining. As known, adenocarcinomas of the small intestine may share a similar immunophenotype with colorectal carcinomas, (32) so differentiation between a small intestinal adenocarcinoma and a colorectal adenocarcinoma may not be straightforward, even though a significant percentage of adenocarcinomas of the small intestine can express CK7. (32) These preliminary data suggested that adenocarcinoma of the small intestine is likely to be negative or only focally positive for SATB2, which, in turn, can be used as a potential marker to distinguish an adenocarcinoma of the small intestine from a colorectal adenocarcinoma. Further investigation would be needed to support this initial finding.
In contrast to SATB2, CDH17 was expressed in 98.4% (123 of 125) of cases of colorectal adenocarcinomas and also in a significant percentage of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus, stomach, and pancreas. The 2 CDH17-negative colorectal carcinomas (both were poorly differentiated carcinomas) were weakly positive for SATB2. Combining the CDH17 and SATB2 staining results, 100% of colorectal carcinomas in this study, including 18 MC cases and 12 poorly differentiated colorectal carcinomas on tissue microarray sections, were positive for either or both of these 2 markers. Our current study demonstrated similar staining results for CDH17 expression in colorectal adenocarcinomas to those reported by Panarelli et al. (25) However, in our study, CDH17 expression in adenocarcinomas of the pancreas, stomach, and esophagus was lower than in their report. (25) We repeated the CDH17 immunostain and obtained identical results. In our study, when less than 5% of the tumor cells were stained, the case was interpreted as negative. In the study by Panarelli et al, 25 the criterion for rendering a negative staining was not clearly stated. If any staining of tumor cells was regarded as a positive case, then the sensitivity would have been higher in their study when compared with the 5% cutoff criterion we used in this study. No satisfactory explanation can be given at this point.
In summary, these data (1) support and confirm the previously reported clinicopathologic features of MC presenting as a large tumor in the right side of the colon in an elderly woman, with frequent loss of both MLH1 and PMS2; (2) substantiate the reports of the loss or marked reduction of expression of CK20 and CDX2 and expression of calretinin and TFF3 in the majority of MC cases; (3) provide evidence for CDH17 and SATB2 being the most sensitive and specific markers for the diagnosis of MC of the large intestine; and (4) further refine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of both CDH17 and SATB2 by broadening the testing in a large number of tumors and normal tissues from various organs. Based on this study and the review of the literature, we propose including MLH1, CDH17, and SATB2 in a routine diagnostic immunohistochemical panel when working on a tumor of unknown primary, especially in an elderly patient with a CK7~/CK20~ carcinoma.
The authors would like to thank Melissa Erb, AAS, for her outstanding secretarial support; Tina Brosious, HT(ASCP), and Erin Powell, HT(ASCP), for construction of tissue microarray blocks and cutting tissue microarray sections; Angie Bitting, HT(ASCP), QIHC, for her assistance with immunostains; and Kathy Fenstermacher, BA, for editing this manuscript.
Please Note: Illustration(s) are not available due to copyright restrictions.
(1.) Ruschoff J, Dietmaier W, Luttges J, et al. Poorly differentiated colonic adenocarcinoma, medullary type: clinical, phenotypic, and molecular characteristics. Am J Pathol. 1997; 150(5):1815-1825.
(2.) Reyes CV, Siddiqui MT. Anaplastic carcinoma of the colon: clinicopathologic study of eight cases of a poorly recognized lesion. Ann Diagn Pathol. 1997; 1(1):19-25.
(3.) Jessurun J, Romero-Guadarrama M, Manivel JC. Medullary adenocarcinoma of the colon: clinicopathologic study of 11 cases. Hum Pathol. 1999; 30(7): 843-848.
(4.) Kon S, Kasai K, Tsuzuki N, et al. Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of rectum: possible relation with EBV. Pathol Res Pract. 2001; 197(8):577-582.
(5.) Arai T, Esaki Y, Sawabe M, Honma N, Nakamura K, Takubo K. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter with absent hMLH1 expression in medullary-type poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma in the elderly. Mod Pathol. 2004; 17(2):172-179.
(6.) Thirunavukarasu P, Sathaiah M, Singla S, et al. Medullary carcinoma of the large intestine: a population based analysis. Int J Oncol. 2010; 37(4):901-907.
(7.) Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2010:138.
(8.) Alexander J, Watanabe T, Wu TT, Rashid A, Li S, Hamilton SR. Histopathological identification of colon cancer with microsatellite instability. Am J Pathol. 2001; 158(2):527-535.
(9.) Hinoi T, Tani M, Lucas PC, et al. Loss of CDX2 expression and microsatellite instability are prominent features of large cell minimally differentiated carcinomas of the colon. Am J Pathol. 2001; 159(6):2239-2248.
(10.) Barbareschi M, Murer B, Colby TV, et al. CDX-2 homeobox gene expression is a reliable marker of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases to the lungs. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003; 27(2):141-149.
(11.) Werling RW, Yaziji H, Bacchi CE, Gown AM. CDX2, a highly sensitive and specific marker of adenocarcinomas of intestinal origin: an immunohisto-chemical survey of 476 primary and metastatic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003; 27(3):303-310.
(12.) Moskaluk CA, Zhang H, Powell SM, Cerilli LA, Hampton GM, Frierson HF Jr. Cdx2 protein expression in normal and malignant human tissues: an immunohistochemical survey using tissue microarrays. Mod Pathol. 2003; 16(9): 913-919.
(13.) Raspollini MR, Baroni G, Taddei A, Taddei GL. Primary cervical adenocarcinoma with intestinal differentiation and colonic carcinoma meta-static to cervix: an investigation using Cdx-2 and a limited immunohisto-chemical panel. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003; 127(12):1586-1590.
(14.) Kaimaktchiev V, Terracciano L, Tornillo L, et al. The homeobox intestinal differentiation factor CDX2 is selectively expressed in gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2004;17(11):1392-1399.
(15.) Houghton O, Connolly LE, McCluggage WG. Morules in endometrioid proliferations of the uterus and ovary consistently express the intestinal transcription factor CDX2. Histopathology. 2008; 53(2):156-165.
(16.) Winn B, Tavares R, Fanion J, et al. Differentiating the undifferentiated: immunohistochemical profile of medullary carcinoma of the colon with an emphasis on intestinal differentiation. Hum Pathol. 2009; 40(3):398-404.
(17.) McGregor DK, Wu TT, Rashid A, Luthra R, Hamilton SR. Reduced expression of cytokeratin 20 in colorectal carcinomas with high levels of microsatellite instability. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28(6):712-718.
(18.) SB Zhu, C Schuerch, Lin F. Absent or low expression of CK20 and CDX2 associated with microsatellite instability in poorly differentiated colorectal carcinomas (PDCC). Mod Pathol. 2005; 18(1S):124A. USACP abstract 567
(19.) Lin F, Liu H. Unknown primary/undifferentiated neoplasms in surgical and cytologic specimens. In: Lin F, Prichard JW, eds. Handbook of Practical Immunohistochemistry: Frequently Asked Questions. New York, NY: Springer; 2011:55-84.
(20.) Wick MR, Vitsky JL, Ritter JH, Swanson PE, Mills SE. Sporadic medullary carcinoma of the colon: a clinicopathologic comparison with nonhereditary poorly differentiated enteric-type adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine colorectal carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005; 123(1):56-65.
(21.) Chu P, Wu E, Weiss LM. Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20 expression in epithelial neoplasms: a survey of 435 cases. Mod Pathol. 2000; 13(9):962-972.
(22.) Angres B, Kim L, Jung R, Gessner R, Tauber R. LI-cadherin gene expression during mouse intestinal development. Dev Dyn. 2001;2 21(2):182-193.
(23.) Berndorff D, Gessner R, Kreft B, et al. Liver-intestine cadherin: molecular cloning and characterization of a novel Ca(2+)-dependent cell adhesion molecule expressed in liver and intestine. J Cell Biol. 1994; 125(6):1353-1369.
(24.) Su MC, Yuan RH, Lin CY, Jeng YM. Cadherin-17 is a useful diagnostic marker for adenocarcinomas of the digestive system. Mod Pathol. 2008; 21(11): 1379-1386.
(25.) Panarelli NC, Yantiss RK, Yeh MM, Liu Y, Chen YT. Tissue-specific cadherin CDH17 is a useful marker of gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas with higher sensitivity than CDX2. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012; 138(2):21 1-222.
(26.) Wang S, Zhou J, Wang XY, et al. Down-regulated expression of SATB2 is associated with metastasis and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 2009; 219(1):114-122.
(27.) Magnusson K, de Wit M, Brennan DJ, et al. SATB2 in combination with cytokeratin 20 identifies over 95% of all colorectal carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011; 35(7):937-948.
(28.) Timek DT, Shi J, Liu H, Lin F. Arginase-1, HepPar-1, and Glypican-3 are the most effective panel of markers in distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic tumor on fine-needle aspiration specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012; 138(2):203-210.
(29.) Lin F, Shi J, Liu H, et al. Diagnostic utility of S100P and von Hippel-Lindau gene product (pVHL) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma--with implication of their roles in early tumorigenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008; 32(1):78-91.
(30.) Conner JR, Hornick JL. SATB2 is a novel marker of osteoblastic differentiation in bone and soft tissue tumours. Histopathology. 2013; 63(1):3649.
(31.) Li Z, Zhou K, Mei K, Kang Q, Cao D. SATB2 is a highly sensitive marker for hindgut well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Mod Pathol. 2013; 26(S2): 164A. USCAP abstract 682.
(32.) Chen ZM, Wang HL. Alteration of cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20 expression profile is uniquely associated with tumorigenesis of primary adenocarcinoma of the small intestine. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28(10):1352-1359.
Fan Lin, MD, PhD; Jianhui Shi, MD, PhD; Shaobo Zhu, MD; Zongming Chen, MD, PhD; Aihua Li, MD, PhD; Taiying Chen, PhD; Hanlin L. Wang, MD, PhD; Haiyan Liu, MD
Accepted for publication September 30, 2013.
Published as an Early Online Release January 1 7, 2014.
From the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania (Drs. Lin, Shi, Zhu, Z. Chen, and Liu); the Division of In Vitro Diagnostics, Epitomics, Inc, an Abcam Company, Burlingame, California (Drs Li and T. Chen); and the Department of Pathology, University of California, Los Angeles (Dr Wang).
Dr Li and Dr T. Chen are employees of Epitomics, Inc, an Abcam Company, in Burlingame, California; antibodies CDH17 (clone EP86), SATB2 (clone EP281 or EPNCIR130B), and TFF3 (EP107) are products of Epitomics. The other authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.
Reprints: Fan Lin, MD, PhD, Department of Laboratory Medicine, MC 01-31, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA 17822 (e-mail: Flin1@geisinger.edu).
Caption: Figure 1. A case of medullary carcinoma (case 16). Hematoxylin-eosin stain (A); loss of expression of MLH1 (B); positive for cadherin-17 (C), SATB-2 (D), TFF3 (E), and MUC4 (F) (original magnifications X400).
Caption: Figure 2. A through D, A case of medullary carcinoma (case 6). Hematoxylin-eosin stain (A), strongly positive for cadherin-17 (B) and SATB-2 (C) and weakly positive for CDX2 (D). E and F, Another medullary carcinoma case (case 15) with strong staining for calretinin (E) and TFF3 (F) (original magnifications X400).
Caption: Figure 3. A case of medullary carcinoma (case 13). Hematoxylin-eosin stain (A), positive for cytokeratin 7 (B), weakly positive for SATB-2 (C), focally positive for calretinin (D), and negative for cytokeratin 20 and for CDX2 (not shown) (original magnifications X400).
Caption: Figure 4. Cadherin-17 membranous staining of adenocarcinoma of the colon (A), esophagus (B), pancreas (C), lung (D), endocervix (E), and endometrium (F) (original magnifications X400).
Caption: Figure 5. SATB2 nuclear staining of colorectal adenocarcinoma (A), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (B), urothelial carcinoma (C), angiosarcoma (D), and normal colon (E). Note that normal small intestinal mucosa is negative for SATB2 (F) (original magnifications X400).
Table 1. Summary of Clinical Information and Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status for 18 Medullary Carcinomas (a) Case Sex Age Location 1 M 94 Cecum 2 F 80 Cecum 3 F 80 Cecum 4 F 80 Ascending 5 F 67 Cecum 6 F 89 Ascending 7 M 72 Transverse 8 F 72 Cecum 9 M 88 Cecum 10 F 80 Cecum 11 F 72 Ascending 12 F 86 Cecum 13 M 84 Ascending 14 F 82 Cecum 15 F 91 Cecum 16 F 52 Ascending 17 M 78 Cecum 18 F 87 Cecum Tumor Case Size (cm) TNM MSI Status 1 10.0 T3N1Mx No evidence of MSI 2 6.4 T3N1bMx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 3 10.5 T4aN1aMx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 4 7.5 T3N0Mx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 5 6.5 T3N0Mx Loss of MSH2 and MSH6 6 9.5 T3N1Mx No evidence of MSI 7 10.5 T4bN0Mx No evidence of MSI 8 7.5 T3N0Mx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 9 4.0 T3N0Mx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 10 9.0 T3N0Mx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 11 10.5 T3NoMx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 12 7.0 T3N0Mx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 13 10.1 T3N0Mx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 14 15.0 T4bN1bM1 Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 15 5.8 T3N0Mx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 16 10.5 T3N0Mx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 17 10.0 T3N1Mx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 18 3.5 T3N0Mx Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 (a) Case 7 also presented with a 6.0 cm well-differentiated adenocarcinoma in the sigmoid colon with no evidence of MSI; case 16 was positive for lymphovascular invasion;case 14 presented with a liver metastasis by computed tomography scan; case 2 also presented with a tubulovillous adenoma; case 17 also presented with multiple tubular adenomas; and case 13 presented with a 10.0-cm left-side colon-mesenteric metastasis 6 months after initial right-side colectomy. Table 2. Summary of Antibody Information and Staining Conditions Approved Antibody Vendora Catalog No. Use Clonality MLH1 Ventana 790-4535 IVD M1 PMS2 Cell Marque 288R-18 IVD EPR3947 MSH2 Ventana 760-4265 IVD G219-1129 MSH6 Cell Marque 278M-18 IVD 44 CDH17 Epitomics/ AC-0095RU0 RUO EP86 Abcam SATB2 (c) Santa Cruz Sc-81376 RUO SATBA4B10 SATB2 (c) Epitomics/ 2891-1 RUO EP281/ Abcam EPNCIR130B CDX2 Cell Marque 235R-16 IVD EPR2764Y CK7 Cell Marque 307M-95 IVD OV-TL 12/30 CK20 Ventana 790-4431 IVD SP33 MUC4 Biocare CM326A IVD 8G-7 Calretinin Ventana 790-4467 IVD SP65 P504S Biocare PP365JJ ASR Polyclonal Villin Ventana 760-4277 IVD CWWB1 Synapto- Cell Marque 336R-98 IVD MRQ-40 physin TFF3 Epitomics/ AC-0103 RUO EP107 Incuba- Antigen Retrieval (b) tion Host Time, Time, Antibody Animal Dilution min Method min MLH1 Mouse Predilute 24 CC1 64 PMS2 Rabbit Predilute 32 CC1 64 MSH2 Mouse Predilute 32 CC1 36 MSH6 Mouse Predilute 8 CC1 36 CDH17 Rabbit 1:100 32 CC1 36 SATB2 (c) Mouse 1:20 44 CC1 64 SATB2 (c) Rabbit 1:100 40 EDTA 15 CDX2 Rabbit 1:600 24 CC1 36 CK7 Mouse 1:200 20 CC1 36 CK20 Rabbit Predilute 20 CC1 64 MUC4 Mouse 1:200 40 CC1 36 Calretinin Rabbit Predilute 24 CC1 36 P504S Mouse Predilute 32 CC1 64 Villin Mouse Predilute 32 CC1 36 Synapto- Rabbit Predilute 16 CC1 36 physin TFF3 Rabbit 1:800 40 CC1 36 Antigen Retrieval (b) Temper- Locali- Antibody ature, zation [degrees]C MLH1 95 N PMS2 95 N MSH2 95 N MSH6 95 N CDH17 95 M SATB2 (c) 95 N SATB2 (c) 100 N CDX2 95 N CK7 95 C CK20 95 C MUC4 95 C Calretinin 95 N + C P504S 95 C Villin 95 M Synapto- 95 C physin TFF3 95 C Abcam Abbreviations: ASR, analyte-specific reagent;C, cytoplasmic staining;IVD, in vitro diagnostic; M, membranous staining; N, nuclear staining;RUO, research use only. (a) Biocare Medical, Inc, Concord, California;Cell Marque Corporation, Rocklin, California;Epitomics, an Abcam Company, Burlingame, California; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Santa Cruz, California;Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, Arizona. (b) pH = 8 for all antigen retrieval procedures. (c) Similar staining results were obtained by using 2 different antibodies against SATB2. Table 3. Expression of Cadherin-17 (CDH17), SATB-2, CDX2, Cytokeratin 7 (CK7), Cytokeratin 20 (CK20), MUC4, TFF3, Calretinin, P504S, Synaptophysin, and Villin in 18 Medullary Carcinomas Case No. CDH17 SABT-2 CDX2 CK20 Calretinin 1 4+, S 3+, I 4+, I 2+, S 2+, S 2 4+, S 3+, I 4+, I Neg Neg 3 4+, S 3+, W 1+, I Neg 1+, W 4 3+, S Neg 1 +, W Neg 1+, W 5 4+, S 2+, S 4+, S Neg Neg 6 4+, S 4+, S 4+, I Neg 1+, S 7 3+, S 4+, S 1+, I 1+, S Neg 8 4+, S 3+, S 3+, S 2+, S 2+, S 9 4+, S 4+, I 1+, I Neg 3+, S 10 4+, S 4+, I 2+, W 2+, S Neg 11 1+, S 2+, I 1+, I Neg 2+, S 12 1+, S 4+, I Neg Neg 3+, S 13 Neg 4+, I Neg Neg 1 +, W 14 Neg 4+, S Neg Neg Neg 15 2+, I 2+, S 1+, W Neg 3+, S 16 3+, S 3+, S Neg Neg 1+, S 17 4+, S 2+, I Neg 1 +, I Neg 18 1+, S Neg Neg Neg 1+, S No. positive/ 16/18 16/18 12/18 5/18 12/18 total No. (89) (89) (67) (28) (67); cases (%) > 3 + stain No. >3 + 12/16 12/16 5/12 0 3/12 stain/total (75) (75) (42) (25) No. positive (%) Case No. TFF3 MUC4 P504S Villin CK7 Synapto- physin 1 2+, S 1+, S 3+, W Neg Neg Neg 2 2+, I Neg 4+, I Neg Neg 1+, I 3 1+, S 1+, S Neg Neg Neg Neg 4 4+, S Neg Neg Neg Neg Neg 5 Neg 2+, S 3+, S Neg Neg 1+, W 6 Neg 3+, S 2+, I Neg Neg Neg 7 2+, S 2+, S 2+, W Neg Neg Neg 8 2+, S 2+, S 3+, I Neg Neg Neg 9 2+, S 1+, S 2+, W 2+, I Neg Neg 10 Neg Neg 2+, I Neg Neg Neg 11 2+, S Neg Neg Neg Neg Neg 12 1+, S 1+, S Neg 3+, S Neg 1+, I 13 Neg 1+, S Neg Neg 3+, S Neg 14 Neg Neg 2+, W Neg Neg Neg 15 2+, S 1+, S Neg Neg Neg Neg 16 2+, S 4+, S Neg Neg Neg Neg 17 3+, S 1+, S 2+, I Neg Neg Neg 18 1+, S 2+, S Neg Neg Neg Neg No. positive/ 13/18 13/18 10/18 2/18 1/18 3/18 total No. (72) (72) (56) (11) (6) (17) cases (%) No. >3 + 2/13 2/13 4/10 1/2 1/1 0 stain/total (15) (15) (40) (50) (100) No. positive (%) Abbreviations: I, intermediate; Neg, negative; S, strong; W, weak. Table 4. Cadherin-17 (CDH17) Expression in 270 Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas (a) No. Positive/ Diagnosis Negative 1 + 2+ 3+ 4+ Total No. Cases (%) Esophagus ADC 10 3 15 2 0 20/30 (67) (n = 30) Stomach ADC 15 2 3 0 0 5/20 (25) (n = 20) Colon ADC 2 0 7 8 108 123/125 (98) (n = 125) Pancreas ADC 78 9 4 3 1 17/95 (18) (n = 95) Abbreviation: ADC, adenocarcinoma. (a) All positive cases show a strong or intermediate staining signal. Table 5. Expression of Cadherin-17 (CDH17) and SATB2 in 1671 Nongastrointestinal Tumors CDH17- SATB2- Positive positive Cases, cases, Diagnosis No. (%) No. (%) Lung adenocarcinoma (n = 198) 26 (13) 6 (3) (a) Lung squamous cell carcinoma (n = 0 13 (10.7) 121) Lung mesothelioma (n = 18) 0 0 Breast ductal carcinoma (n = 72) 0 0 Breast lobular carcinoma (n = 48) 0 0 Clear cell RCC, low grade (n = 34) 0 0 Clear cell RCC, high grade (n = 38) 0 3W (7.9) Chromophobe RCC (n = 15) 0 0 Oncocytoma (n = 15) 0 0 Papillary RCC (n = 16) 0 3W (18.8) Endocervical ADC, invasive (n = 55) 15 (27) 5 (9) Endocervical ADC, in situ (n = 16) 5 (31) 0 Endometrial ADC, FIGO I (n = 38) 1 (3) 1 (3) Endometrial ADC, FIGO II (n = 55) 4 (8) 2 (3.6) Endometrial ADC, FIGO III (n = 38) 0 2 (5.3) Bladder invasive UC (n = 43) 3 (7) 10 (23) Bladder noninvasive UC (n = 38) 0 7 (18.4) Ovarian serous carcinoma (n = 41) 0 1 (2.1) Hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 18) 1 (6) 0 Prostate ADC, low grade (n = 97) 0 0 Prostate ADC, high grade (n = 35) 1 (3) 0 Thyroid papillary carcinoma (n = 47) 0 0 Thyroid follicular carcinoma 0 0 (n = 37) Thyroid follicular adenoma (n = 51) 0 0 Thyroid MC (n = 12) 0 0 Melanoma (n = 93) 0 0 Germ cell tumors (n = 60) 0 0 Pheochromocytoma (n = 13) 0 0 Adrenal adenoma (n = 23) 0 0 Lymphoma (n = 84) 0 0 Myeloma (n = 80) 0 0 Angiosarcoma (n = 35) 0 3 (8.6) (b) Hemangioma (n = 51) 0 0 Gastrointestinal stromal tumor 0 0 (n = 36) Total positive cases, No. (%) 55 (3.3) 60 (3.6) Abbreviations: ADC, adenocarcinoma; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; MC, medullary carcinoma; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; UC, urothelial carcinoma; W, weak staining. (a) 3 of 6 positive cases showed weak staining. (b) 2 of 3 positive cases showed weak staining. Table 6. Expression of Cadherin-17 (CDH17) and SATB2 in 358 Cases of Normal Tissues CDH17- SATB2- Positive Positive Total No. Cases, Cases, Kidney Cases No. (%) No. (%) Stomach, antrum 20 0 0 Stomach, body 20 0 0 Duodenum 20 20 (100) 0 Ileum 20 20 0 Colon 100 100 (100) 100 (100) Liver (hepatocytes) 28 0 (a) 0 Lung 20 0 0 Prostate 24 0 0 Ovary 21 0 0 Thyroid 15 0 0 Kidney 20 0 0 Uterine cervix 27 0 0 Seminal vesicles 23 0 3 (13) (b) (a) Hepatocytes were negative for CDH17, but in 3 cases, the bile ducts were focally positive for CDH17. (b) Focal, weak positivity for SATB2 in 3 cases. Table 7. SATB2 Expression in 270 Cases of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Positive Diagnosis Negative 1 + 2+ 3+ 4+ Cases, No. (%) Esophagus ADC 28 2W 0 0 0 2 (6.7) (n = 30) Stomach ADC 21 0 0 0 0 0 (n = 20) Colon ADC 4 5/1W 7/9W 10/5W 84 121 (96.8) (n = 125) Pancreas ADC 91 1 1/1W 0 1 4 (4.2) (n = 95) Abbreviations: ADC, adenocarcinoma; W, weak staining.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Original Articles|
|Author:||Lin, Fan; Shi, Jianhui; Zhu, Shaobo; Chen, Zongming; Li, Aihua; Chen, Taiying; Wang, Hanlin L.; Liu,|
|Publication:||Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine|
|Date:||Aug 1, 2014|
|Previous Article:||Performance Evaluation of Samsung [LABGEO.sup.HC10] Hematology Analyzer.|
|Next Article:||Confirmation of Cause and Manner of Death Via a Comprehensive Cardiac Autopsy Including Whole Exome Next-Generation Sequencing.|