Printer Friendly

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DIAGNOSTIC GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MACROPHAGE ACTIVATION SYNDROME COMPLICATING SYSTEMIC JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS: SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE/USPOREDBA RAZLICITIH DIJAGNOSTICKIH SMJERNICA ZA DIJAGNOZU SINDROMA AKTIVACIJE MAKROFAGA KOJI KOMPLICIRA SISTEMSKI TIP JUVENILNOG IDIOPATSKOG ARTRITISA: ISKUSTVO JEDNOG CENTRA.

Introduction

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a potentially fatal complication of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), caused by an exaggerated but ineffective immune response involving excessive macrophage and T cell activation, followed by high production of proinflammatory cytokines (1-3). The cardinal clinical symptoms and signs are prolonged high fever, hepatosplenomegaly, neurologic dysfunction, and hemorrhagic manifestations. Characteristic laboratory abnormalities include pancytopenia, elevated levels of serum liver enzymes, triglycerides, lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin, and low levels of fibrinogen. Although macrophage hemophagocytosis is often seen on bone marrow examination, in the initial stages of the syndrome this finding may be absent (4,5). The reported mortality rates of MAS reach 20%-30%, but the outcome can be improved by early diagnosis and prompt initiation of life-saving treatment (3). The estimated prevalence of MAS in sJIA is 10%. However, recent evidence suggests that the syndrome may occur subclinically in an additional 30%-40% of sJIA patients (6,7). Because MAS is similar to the group of histiocytic disorders belonging to hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), it is currently classified among the secondary, or acquired, forms of HLH (8,9). Three sets of guidelines are currently available for diagnosing MAS in patients with sJIA, as follows: diagnostic guidelines for HLH (HLH-2004), which were primarily developed for homozygous genetic disorders (10); preliminary diagnostic guidelines for MAS complicating sJIA from 2005 (11); and the new set of classification criteria for MAS complicating sJIA from 2016, based on a combination of expert consensus, available evidence from medical literature, and analysis of real patient data (12).

Patients and Methods

A retrospective study was carried out at the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, in the period from 2009 to 2015. The study included 35 children aged 1-18 diagnosed with sJIA according to ILAR criteria (13). Epidemiological and clinical data were obtained from patient records. Demographic information included gender, date of birth, age at onset of sJIA and age at onset of MAS. Clinical data included fever, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, hemorrhagic manifestations, lymphadenopathy, active arthritis, central nervous system (CNS) involvement and serositis. Extensive laboratory workup was performed on all patients (erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), complete blood count, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase, fibrinogen, D-dimer levels, ferritin, triglycerides, and immunologic parameters including anti-nuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and rheumatoid factor). Quantitative data are presented as median with interquartile range, and categorical data are presented as absolute number. An Ethics Committee approval was obtained before data collection.

Results

Systemic JIA was diagnosed in 35 children, 23 boys and 12 girls, mean age ([+ or -]SD) 5.51[+ or -]3.65 years. Eight of 35 patients had flare of sJIA. At the disease onset, all patients presented with fever, evanescent rash and arthritis. The most consistent symptoms were hepatomegaly (8/35) and splenomegaly (4/35). All patients with flare of sJIA also presented with fever and evanescent rash, and half of them had hepatomegaly. Inflammation markers (ESR and CRP) were elevated in all patients at disease onset and in flare (Table 1).

With the use of guidelines from 2005, MAS was diagnosed in six (6/35, 17.1%) patients with sJIA. In four of them, it occurred at the onset of sJIA during first hospitalization and in the remaining two patients, it occurred during flare. With the new set of criteria from 2016, MAS was diagnosed in four (4/35, 11.4%) patients with sJIA. In three of them, it occurred during first hospitalization, and in one patient it occurred during flare. MAS was not diagnosed with the HLH-2004 guidelines. Fever (6/6) and hepatomegaly (5/6) were the most common clinical criteria recorded in patients with MAS, followed by splenomegaly and hemorrhages. CNS dysfunction was not recorded. All laboratory values were abnormal, as expected (showing either increased or decreased levels) in patients with MAS when compared with sJIA patients (Table 1).

Discussion

We compared the capacity of HLH-2004 guidelines with the capacity of MAS guidelines from 2005, and with the new ones from 2016 as diagnostic tools for MAS associated with sJIA. With the new set of criteria from 2016, the prevalence of MAS was 11.4% (4/35) and with the guidelines from 2005 the prevalence of MAS was 17.1% (6/35). HLH-2004 guidelines did not record MAS at all. This is consistent with literature data where the prevalence of MAS in sJIA is 10%, and with recent evidence suggesting the possibility of subclinical occurrence in an additional 30%-40% of sJIA patients (6,7).

Macrophage activation syndrome generally develops in earlier phases of the underlying disease, or may be the presenting manifestation of sJIA. In our study, four out of six patients had MAS at the onset of sJIA, during first hospitalization, and in two out of six patients it occurred during flare.

Typically, patients with MAS become acutely ill with sudden onset of nonremitting high fever, profound depression in all 3 blood cell lines (i.e. leukopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia), hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and elevated serum liver enzyme levels. In our study, two of 35 patients had full-blown clinical picture of MAS, with laboratory test values in line with expectations, showing absolute decline and typical changes that occur in the syndrome. Another four of 35 patients had incomplete clinical features and relative decline in these laboratory parameters in comparison with sJIA patients.

Clinical symptoms are often delayed or similar to confusable conditions such as infections, sepsis and flare of underlying disease. Comparing the criteria, it is obvious that the majority of our patients satisfied the criteria from 2005, which include clinical manifestations such as hepatomegaly and hemorrhages. Notably, five out of six patients with MAS had hepatomegaly. However, hepatomegaly was present in half (4/8) of patients with sJIA flare and in eight (8/35) patients at the onset of sJIA, probably because mild hepatomegaly is a frequent feature of active sJIA.

The prevalence of all laboratory MAS criteria was much greater in patients with MAS comparing to sJIA. Hyperferritinemia is an important laboratory hallmark of MAS, therefore, it is mandatory in the new set of classification criteria (ferritin >684 ng/mL). In our study, patients with MAS had significantly increased ferritin levels; they all met the previously mentioned condition, whereas patients at the onset of sJIA and flare of sJIA did not. In the new set of MAS criteria, platelet count and fibrinogen levels are within the normal range of laboratory tests and the levels of AST and triglycerides are only slightly above the normal limits. In contrast, children with active sJIA usually have significantly increased platelet counts and fibrinogen levels, and normal levels of AST and triglycerides (12,14). In our study, most of the MAS patients had slightly decreased platelet count, slightly increased AST and triglycerides, while the levels of fibrinogen and leukocytes were within the normal range.

Our results should be interpreted in the light of some potential limitations, primarily the small number of MAS patients. However, we would like to point out that we were dealing with the disease that is not considered common. Patient data were collected through retrospective review of clinical charts. We had incomplete laboratory data for triglycerides and fibrinogen, which both are part of the guidelines.

In conclusion, due to the use of different diagnostic guidelines, we found a difference in the prevalence of MAS. It was slightly higher in comparison to available studies, while other investigated features, such as clinical characteristics, were similar. It is important to make a timely diagnosis of MAS, usually by clinical expert opinion and detection of subtle laboratory alteration before the occurrence of full-blown clinical picture which, if untreated, leads to fatal outcome.

References

(1.) Ravelli A, Grom AA, Behrens EM, Cron RQ Macrophage activation syndrome as part of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: diagnosis, genetics, pathophysiology and treatment. Genes Immun. 2012;13:289-98. doi: 10.1038/gene.2012.3.

(2.) Grom AA, Mellins ED. Macrophage activation syndrome: advances towards understanding pathogenesis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2010;22:561-6. doi: 10.1097/01.bor.0000381996.69261.71.

(3.) Ravelli A. Macrophage activation syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:548-52.

(4.) Bode SF, Lehmberg K, Maul-Pavicic A, Vraetz T, Janka G, Stadt UZ, et al. Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14:213. doi: 10.1186/ar3843. PubMed PMID: 22682420; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3446494.

(5.) Arico M, Janka G, Fischer A, Henter JI, Blanche S, Elinder G, et al.; FHL Study Group of the Histiocyte Society. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: report of 122 children from the International Registry. Leukemia. 1996;10:197-203.

(6.) Behrens EM, Beukelman T, Paessler M, Cron RQ. Occult macrophage activation syndrome in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:1133-8.

(7.) Bleesing J, Prada A, Siegel DM, Villanueva J, Olson J, Ilowite NT, et al. The diagnostic significance of soluble CD163 and soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain in macrophage activation syndrome and untreated new onset systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritits. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:965-71. doi: 10.1002/art.22416.

(8.) Athreya BH. Is macrophage activation syndrome a new entity? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002;20:121-3.

(9.) Ramanan AV, Schneider R. Macrophage activation syndrome - what's in a name! J Rheumatol. 2003;30:2513-6.

(10.) Henter JI, Elinder G, Ost A; The FHL Study Group of the Histiocyte Society. Diagnostic guidelines for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Semin Oncol. 1991;18:29-33.

(11.) Ravelli A, Magni-Manzoni S, Pistorio A, Besana C, Foti T, Ruperto N, et al. Preliminary diagnostic guidelines for macrophage activation syndrome complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Pediatr. 2005;146:598-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.12.016.

(12.) Ravelli A, Minoia F, Davi S, Horne A, Bovis F, Pistorio A, et al.; European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology/Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation. 2016 Classification Criteria for Macrophage Activation Syndrome Complicating Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:566-76. doi: 10.1002/art.39332.

(13.) Petty RE, Southwood TR, Baum J, Bhettay E, Glass DN, Manners P, et al. Revision of the proposed classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Durban, 1997. J Rheumatol. 1998;25:1991-4.

(14.) Minoia F, Davi S, Horne A, Demirkaya E, Bovis F, Li C, et al. Clinical features, treatment and outcome of macrophage activation syndrome complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a multinational, multicenter study of 362 patients. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:3160-9. doi: 10.1002/art.38802.

Marija Jelusic, Matea Kronja, Marijan Frkovic, Sasa Srsen, Sanda Huljev Frkovic and Ksenija Stekic Novacki

Department of Pediatrics, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia

Correspondence to: Assoc. Prof Marija Jelusic, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Referral Centre for Pediatric Rheumatology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Kispaticeva 12, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia

E-mail: marija.jelusic.drazic@gmail.com

Received June 27, 2016, accepted September 12, 2016

doi: 10.20471/acc.2018.57.02.11
Table 1. Clinical features and laboratory values of patients with
systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), in sJIA flare, and in
patients with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) complicating sJIA

                           Onset of sJIA       Flare of sJIA
                           n (35)              n (8)

Fever                       35/35                8/8
Arthritis                   35/35                6/8
Evanescent rash             35/35                8/8
Generalized                  2/35                0
lymphadenopathy
Hepatomegaly                 8/35                4/8
Splenomegaly                 4/35                1/8
Serositis                    3/35                0
Hemorrhages                  0                   0
CNS involvement              0                   0
CRP (mg/L)                 132.2 (31.7-320.8)   59 (25-124)
ESR (mm/h)                  81 (32-142)         39 (25-70)
Hemoglobin (g/dL)          108 (77-130)        118 (87-128)
WBC (x[10.sup.9]/L)         16.6 (9.6-44.8)     13.8 (7.6-24.8)
Platelets (x[10.sup.9]/L)  436 (275-868)       322 (204-371)
Fibrinogen (g/L)             6.7 (5.1-8.4)       5.5 (3.6-6.2)
D-dimer (mg/L)               2.8 (0.8-14.2)      2.3 (0.33-5.9)
Ferritin ([micro]g/L)      412 (129.9-9843)    570 (173.7-11229)
AST (U/L)                   28 (15-61)          42 (15-74)
Triglycerides (mmol/L)       1.30 (0.53-1.87)    1.29 (1.18-1.90)

                           Systemic JIA with MAS
                           n (6)

Fever                         6/6
Arthritis                     1/6
Evanescent rash               0
Generalized                   0
lymphadenopathy
Hepatomegaly                  5/6
Splenomegaly                  1/6
Serositis                     1/6
Hemorrhages                   1/6
CNS involvement               0
CRP (mg/L)                  123 (65-431.4)
ESR (mm/h)                   27.5 (14-55)
Hemoglobin (g/dL)           105 (87-127)
WBC (x[10.sup.9]/L)           6.1 (4.0-7.4)
Platelets (x[10.sup.9]/L)   177 (124-271)
Fibrinogen (g/L)              3.3 (2.1-4.2)
D-dimer (mg/L)                5.5 (1.4-45.6)
Ferritin ([micro]g/L)      3531(783-20000)
AST (U/L)                    66 (26-210)
Triglycerides (mmol/L)        2.09 (1.29-3.92)

CNS = central nervous system; CRP = C-reactive protein;
ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate; WBC = white blood cell count;
AST = aspartate aminotransferase
COPYRIGHT 2018 Klinicki bolnicki centar Sestre milosrdnice
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Scientific Paper
Author:Jelusic, Marija; Kronja, Matea; Frkovic, Marijan; Srsen, Sasa; Frkovic, Sanda Huljev; Novacki, Kseni
Publication:Acta Clinica Croatica
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:4EXCR
Date:Jun 1, 2018
Words:2117
Previous Article:FLOW CHANGES IN ORBITAL VESSELS DETECTED WITH COLOR DOPPLER ULTRASOUND IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY DYSTHYROID OPTIC NEUROPATHY/POREMECAJI CIRKULACIJE U...
Next Article:THE EFFICACY OF LOW-LEVEL LASER THERAPY IN BURNING MOUTH SYNDROME - A PILOT STUDY/UCINKOVITOST LIJECENJA NISKOENERGETSKIM LASEROM U SINDROMU PEKUCIH...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |