Printer Friendly

CFO Executive Board Releases Research Results; SOX 404 Legislation Triggering Delayed 10-K Filings and CFO Turnover.

WASHINGTON -- The Washington, D.C. based CFO Executive Board, a division of the Corporate Executive Board (NASDAQ: EXBD), a leading provider of best-practice research and quantitative analysis, today announced their research reveals that Sarbanes Oxley Section 404 legislation is causing many more companies to miss deadlines for filing their financial reports; with nearly 300 companies indicating that they cannot file their 10-Ks with the SEC on time (versus only 70 last year). Additionally, the finding of a material weakness in a company's control structure is having a significant impact on CFO turnover, not on company share price.

Delayed 10-K Filings. CFO Executive Board preliminary analysis of 10-K filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission indicates that the number of companies failing to meet their March 16th filing deadline has dramatically increased, with nearly 300 companies indicating that they cannot file their 10-Ks on time (versus only 70 last year). Many companies have formally reported that they have been unable to complete their 10-K filings because of material weaknesses in their internal controls with many also informally sharing that they have missed the deadline because their external auditors failed to complete their Section 404 reviews.

Increased CFO Departures Despite Muted Market Reaction. In addition, while market reaction (as of March 10) to controls weakness disclosures made by companies with greater than $500M in revenues has been muted (less than a 3% decline relative to the S&P and most of decline concentrated in a few companies), CFOs haven't fared as well. According to ARC Morgan and CFO Executive Board research, more than half of CFOs at companies making such disclosures are changing jobs either right before or within a few months of the disclosure. Indeed, CFO search activity has nearly doubled this year at many executive search firms.

Drivers of Material Weakness Disclosures. As of March 16th, 11% of filers have reported a material weakness under provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, in excess of the 10% estimate made by PWC's CEO earlier this year. Early Roundtable analysis of 10-K filings reveal three principle drivers of material weakness disclosure:

--External auditors appear to be increasingly re-opening long-accepted accounting practice and forcing companies to re-interpret, often leading to material weakness disclosures.

--Over a decade of finance function cost-cutting appears to have come back to bite companies in the form of personnel-related controls weaknesses. Compounding the problem is the lack of availability of technically skilled finance talent, and emerging skill and compensation misalignments in finance organizations.

--Tax issues appear to particularly plague large companies. A review of remediation steps reveals that there appear to be historical fractures in tax documentation, lack of rigorous review, and a siloed functional structure causing controls weaknesses.

Implications for CFOs and Other Senior Executives. In light of these developments, CFOs and other senior executives face significant Sarbanes-Oxley-related risks in 2005:

--undermining compliance success by cutting compliance costs too quickly,

--key finance staff turnover in light of perceived career risk, and

--an imbalance of power with their external auditors that is not only driving up compliance costs (finance executives predict these fees may reach 80% of 2004 levels), but also forcing changes in long-standard accounting treatment interpretations.

Immediate Action. CFOs and senior executives at all organizations immediately should:

--ensure they are not demanding from their Sarbanes-Oxley teams large cost reductions in 2005 that could compromise future compliance success.

--conduct conversations with all key finance staff to identify any risk of departure and implement retention strategies and fund staffing investments to reduce the risk of control failures, and

--build (or strengthen) an independent relationships with an additional public accounting firm to preserve future options to switch external auditors.

Additional Information. This work is the latest in the CFO Executive Board's research examining challenges that senior finance executives face in handling the increased regulatory burden of Sarbanes-Oxley. Detailed analysis of the types of material weaknesses being disclosed and by whom, are available at www.cfo.executiveboard.com or by contacting the CFO Executive Board at bohannos@executiveboard.com.

The CFO Executive Board's research is available exclusively to members.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Mar 18, 2005
Words:676
Previous Article:Siemens to Acquire CTI Molecular Imaging, Inc.; Acquisition Expands Molecular Imaging Competencies of Siemens Medical Solutions.
Next Article:Hartmann Unveils New Marketing Strategy at 2005 Travel Goods Show; New Direction Strikes Balance between Romance and Everyday Life.


Related Articles
From the editor.
Executives praise SOX but seek changes; it's not quite a backlash, but after the first full year of reporting under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, many...
Lessons learned: COSO, COBiT and other emerging standards for SOX compliance.
Status check: three years after SOX, effectiveness of audit committees is a mixed bag.
Getting your bench right: succession planning tends to focus on the CEO, but getting the right C-suite rotation can be just as important.
From the editor.
The sky isn't falling fear of SOX is waning.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters