Printer Friendly

Buffalo soldiers: Glen Ford examines the U.S. military's track record of racial hostilities. (Enemies of the State).

"Mama, when I get over there I have the feeling they are going to arrest me just because of the name that I have carried." That's how Quran Bilal remembers a parting conversation with her son, 31-year-old Sgt. Hasan Karim Akbar, now facing double murder charges in the "fragging" of three 101st Airborne (Assault) Division command tents in Kuwait in the early days of the Iraq invasion.

To date, we are told only that Sgt. Akbar had exhibited "attitude problems" and been "acting insubordinate" after the division's deployment to Kuwait from Fort Campbell, Kentucky, in February, leading superiors to hold him in the rear while elements of his unit set out for Baghdad. Doubtless we will learn that he was "troubled"--another readymade institutional absolution--as when he reportedly told Army authorities after his arrest, "You guys are coming into our countries, and you're going to rape our women and kill our children." Presumably, Sgt. Akbar meant Muslim countries.

"Just a Bunch of Hajis"

A murderously delusional American society and military are incompetent to judge Sgt. Akbar's or any other black soldier's mental and emotional bearings. But they are right about one thing: Sgt. Akbar was not suited for their war.

BBC reporter Mark Franchetti, embedded with the U.S. Marines during the battle of Nasiriyah, observed the "jittery aggressors who talked of wanting to 'nuke' the place."

"The Iraqis are sick people and we are the chemotherapy," said Corporal Ryan Dupre, according to Franchetti's reports. "I am starting to bate this country. Wait till I get hold of a friggin' Iraqi. No, I won't get hold of one. I'll just kill him."

Franchetti's March 30 account in The Times (UK) continues: "About 100 marines jumped out of their vehicles and took cover in ditches, pointing their sights at a mud-caked house. Was it harboring gunmen? Small groups of marines approached, cautiously, to search for the enemy. A dozen terrified civilians, mainly women and children, emerged with their hands raised.

"It's just a bunch of Hajis," said one gunner from his turret, using their nickname for Arabs. "Friggin' women and children, that's all."

After 30 years of fine-tuning the all-volunteer military; the Pentagon has finally gotten the perfect demographic mix, the human resources that uniformed brass and corporate civilian war planners believe will establish a New American Century in every corner of the globe by force of arms. Sgt. Akbar was lucid enough to recognize the purposefully hostile environment that confronted him. The "combat arms" of the U.S. military are packed with white sons of the South, led by Republican officers.

A Confederacy in Arms

Forty-two percent of the U.S. military enlisted from Southern states in 2000, up from 31 percent in 1980. Dixie's military dominance dwarfs all other regions--the Northeast accounts for just 14 percent of recruits, the West, 23 percent, and the Midwest, 20 percent.

Although African Americans comprise 26 percent of the Army (and 22 percent of the combined services), that proportion is halved among the "combat" specialties such as infantry and armored gun crews, and sliced further in the elite units that form the cutting edges of war. The good old boys rule in these outfits.

Just as ominously, the 80 percent white officer class has grown far more politicized than the public at large during the last few decades, according to a March 30 New York Times article, "Military Mirrors Working-Class America."

"Those who warn of a warrior class cite a study by the Triangle Institute for Security Studies in North Carolina showing that between 1976 and 1996 the percentage of military officers who saw themselves as nonpartisan or politically independent fell from more than 50 percent to less than 20 percent," the article said. "The main beneficiary of this shift has been the Republican Party."

The current U.S. military demography has been cultivated to suit the purposes to which it is presently deployed in Iraq, and for future aggressions and occupations throughout the non-white world. This volunteer force is the product of three decades of social engineering, designed to prevent a return of the Pentagon's worst nightmare: a critical mass" of black soldiers in the combat arms, as occurred in Vietnam.

However, in the process of properly debunking the "myth" that blacks died in disproportionate numbers in Vietnam, the Times and its favored experts distort history. They have misplaced critical facts and depicted causes and effects in reverse, totally obscuring the important role black soldiers played in dismantling the U.S. war machinery in Vietnam by refusing to act as an imperial army or to die in the numbers that the planners intended.

Black Soldiers Shut Down the War

The Times piece concedes that black casualties were high "in the early stages of the American ground war in 1965 and 1966, when there were large numbers of blacks in front-line combat units." Here, the historical revision begins. "Army and Marine Corps commanders later took steps to reassign black servicemen to other jobs to equalize deaths, according to Col. Harry C. Summers Jr. in 'Vietnam War Almanac.' By the end of the war," said the Times, "African-Americans had suffered 12.5 percent of the total deaths in Vietnam, 1 percentage point less than their proportion in the overall population, Colonel Summers wrote.

Colonel Summers and the New York Times are talking nonsense. It is laughable to pretend that U.S. military brass acted at any time to limit black casualty rates. What? In order to increase white death rates?! Commanders "took steps to reassign black servicemen" because African American soldiers collectively resisted Washington's plans to make them the expendable casualties of Vietnam. They effectively shut down the war from within--a history that has never been fully told, but one that is seared in the memories of those in charge of Americas current and future imperial enterprises.

Despite high black casualties in the early Vietnam years, a whiter casualty list was the last thing on the Pentagon's mind. President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara were most concerned about how to pull off a massive increase in U.S. troop strength without dipping too deeply into the white middle class youth pool.

So, in 1966, a year that began with 200,000 men in Vietnam, McNamara announced Project 100,000, the most cynical race-class ploy ever lumped under the umbrella of LBJ's War on Poverty.

With a straight face, McNamara declared that Project 100,000 was intended for the benefit of the "poor of America [who] have not had the opportunity to earn their fair share of this nation's abundance, but they can be given an opportunity to serve in their country's defense." Military testing standards were lowered, high school dropouts became eligible for service, and draft boards and recruiters were encouraged to overlook criminal justice offenses.

By 1971, when the U.S. ground war in Vietnam was sputtering to an end, "354,000 men had entered the Services under the program, according to the congressional testimony of Wayne S. Sellman, a Department of Defense official. "Of these, 54 percent were volunteers and 46 percent were draftees. The men who entered under Project 100,000 were on average 20 years of age, about half came from the south, and a substantial proportion (about 41 percent) were minorities.

This was the infusion that allowed the Pentagon to boost Vietnam troop strength to 540,000 in the peak year of 1969, while accommodating massive draft deferments among the comfortable white classes. Young black draftees and volunteers flocked to elite outfits, comprising near or absolute majorities in line units of the 101st and 82nd Airborne Divisions and the 173rd Airborne Brigade (all now heavily white and Hispanic, and deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan).

There was one problem with this black "street" army. As a black lieutenant put it in Bloods, Wallace Terry's seminal oral history of African Americans in Vietnam, "They are the ones who ain't going to take no more shit."

The "commanders" that war historian Col. Summers credits with compassionately reassigning blacks out of harm's way in fact went to extreme lengths to break the spirits of black soldiers and destroy any expressions of black solidarity. Ultimately, the military established a mostly black penal colony in Vietnam to enforce the terms of its internal race war. An online resource, History of the Military Police, cites 1969 as the "year the U.S. military prisoner population peaks when 10,450 military prisoners are confined in Vietnam, most at the United States Army Installation Stockade at Long Binh, known as the Long Binh Jail (LBJ)."

In August 1968, black inmates burned Long Binh Jail to the ground--which was later rebuilt. Jimi Childress was 19 years old, locked up for going AWOL from his unit. He told his story to Cecil Barr Currey, author of Long Binh Jail: An Oral History of Vietnam's Notorious U.S. Military Prison (1999).

"All these guys that was in these conex boxes were black. You see? White guys in the stockade had fringe benefits. We had none. It was just a hateful place. Hispanics stuck with blacks, just for safety reasons, but there was so few you hardly noticed. It was a black prison. I will never forget how many blacks were incarcerated in that stockade."

In 1968, combined Vietnam AWOLs and desertions reached over 150 per thousand soldiers. About 100 black deserters established "Soul Alley" in a Saigon neighborhood near Ton San Nhut Airport. Fully armed black and white troops faced off at China Beach, Danang.

According to a study of "fragging" by historian Terry Anderson of Texas A & M University: "The US Army itself does nor know exactly how many officers were murdered. But they know at least 600 were murdered, and then they have another 1400 that died mysteriously. Consequently by early 1970, the army [was] at war not with the enemy but with itself."

The internal "war" was overwhelmingly racial in character.

Racism Gets a Beat Down

We were at war stateside, as well. I was among the 6,000 soldiers of the 82nd Airborne Division that occupied Washington, D.C. in the aftermath of Dr. Martin Luther King's assassination, April 1968. Black troops made up about half of the division's line units. We were aware that the near-lily white New Jersey National Guard had gone on a killing rampage on the streets of Newark the previous year--roaring down Springfield Avenue and shooting into businesses that had hung out "Soul Brother" signs. We made it unmistakably clear to white soldiers that no harm was to come to the D.C. population. Nobody got hurt.

At "home" in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, we fought the Division's overwhelmingly white and Southern MPs at every nocturnal opportunity. While the Ku Klux Klan and other racist groups ran amuck at nearby Camp Lejeune Marine Base, racists at Fort Bragg sulked in silence. Criminal Investigation Detachment personnel entered Black-dominated barracks in force, if at all.

In the fall of 1968, Commanding General John Deane, weary of racial strife, called the entire division to a parade field. "I give up," he said, bluntly, then pledged to address a long list of black grievances. He kept most of those promises. The black soldiers of the 82nd had the "critical mass" to kick ass, if provoked.

The U.S. military never forgot their experience with the Vietnam-era black "street army," and would scheme and conspire for the next three decades to ensure that white supremacy would never again be threatened in the elite combat arms.

In 1995, the New York Times described the 82nd as the "whitest" division in the U.S. Army. Port Bragg fell under national scrutiny following the murder of a black couple by racist paratroopers on the streets of next-door Fayetteville. Subsequent investigation turned up 22 members and associates of white supremacist organizations in the division's ranks.

Eight months prior to the killings, a paratrooper affiliated with the ultra-violent National Alliance rented a billboard near the main highway entrance to the base. The billboard read: "Enough! Let's start taking back America! National Alliance" and carried the telephone number of the group's local message line. Nobody seems to have thought the sign outrageous. There is no longer a black "critical mass" of the kind that counts at Fort Bragg. But you can be sure there are plenty of "haji" killers.

Since the end of the draft in 1973 the U.S. military has succeeded in whitening the combat arms by excluding low test scorers, high school dropouts, and people with criminal records--a huge chunk of African American youth. (Twelve percent of black males in their 20s and early 30s are in jail or prison on any given day.) The remainder of the pool is actually more qualified for the "softer" military occupations, such as administration, than their white and Latino working class peers in uniform. In addition, the black "support" specialty ranks are also bolstered by black female cadre, a majority of the women in the Army.

However, none of this explains the dearth of African Americans in units like the 82nd and Sgt. Hasan Karim Akbar's 101st Airborne (Assault) Division. African American youth have always been drawn to the uniforms and cachet of elite units--unless they are made to feel unwelcome (as was the case for many years in the Marines). By my reckoning, about half of the black paratroopers with whom I served were draftees who nevertheless volunteered for airborne duty.

It is apparent that the U.S. military has created an environment in the elite combat arms that is hostile to entrance by significant numbers of black soldiers. Whatever personal problems Sgt. Akbar may or may not have had, on this score, he knew he was in the wrong place.

Glen Ford is co-publisher of BlackCommentator.com
COPYRIGHT 2003 Color Lines Magazine
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Ford, Glen
Publication:Colorlines Magazine
Date:Jun 22, 2003
Words:2299
Previous Article:Staffing the homeland: the feds are avidly pursuing "diversity" hires, but what are the risks of representing at security and intelligence agencies?...
Next Article:Bush's winning hand: racial tokens in the administration. (Enemies of the State).


Related Articles
Military glossary: read this brief guide to some of the terms you may come across as you follow the news about the war with Iraq, then fill in the...
Montford Point Marines.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |