Brucellosis in Takins, China.
In January 2009, in the nature reserve in Qinling Mountains, China, hygromas were found on the knees, stifles, hocks, haunches, and bursae between the nuchal ligament and the primary thoracic spines of 10 free-ranging takins (Budorcas taxicolor). The hygroma contents and tissue samples were collected by using aseptic technique, packed separately, cooled immediately, and stored frozen at -20[degrees]C until cultured. The samples were streaked onto blood agar and MacConkey agar and incubated aerobically or anaerobically with 5% C[O.sub.2] at 37[degrees]C for 4 days.
Tiny gram-negative coccobacilli were isolated. The organism was nonmotile at 20[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C, and it stained red with the Stamp modification of the Ziehl-Neelsen method. The organism was identified as B. melitensis by the Vitek 2 GN identification system (bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). The isolate was urease positive, catalase positive, and oxidase positive. It did not require carbon dioxide for growth and did not produce hydrogen sulfide. The isolate could be agglutinated by A-monospecific antiserum but not by M-monospecific antiserum or rough Brucella-specific antiserum. It was sensitive to Berkeley and Iz phages at routine test dilution but not sensitive to Tbilisi, Weybridge, Firenze, and R/C phages. According to classical biotyping methods, the isolate was identified as B. melitensis biotype 2 (5).
Molecular identification by 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used in this study (6). According to nucleotide-nucleotide GenBank search by using BLAST (http://blast. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), the sequence was 100% identical to the sequences of 16S rDNA of brucellae, especially reference strains including B. melitensis 16M (GenBank accession no. NC_003317), B. abortus biovar 1 str. 9-941 (NC_006932), B. suis 1330 (NC_004310), B. canis American Type Culture Collection 23365 (NC_010103), and B. ovis American Type Culture Collection 25840 (NC_009505). The isolate was further confirmed as B. melitensis according to the 731-bp product by using AMOS-PCR, which discriminates among species by the unique locations of the IS711 element (7,8). The restriction pattern of the omp2b gene by Hinf I was accordant with pattern 3 reported by Cloeckaert et al. (9); this finding further indicated that the isolate was B. melitensis (9).
The takin (Budorcas taxicolor) is a ruminant belonging to the family Bovidae, subfamily Caprinae, genus Budorcas (Figure). Takins are found in eastern Asia and Southeast Asia and are listed as "vulnerable A2cd" by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (10). Brucellosis might pose a major direct or indirect threat to the conservation of endangered species, such as takins, and can be a source of conflicts among stakeholders in conservation efforts.
Several antelopes, such as takins, serows (Capricornis sumatraensis), and gorals (Naemorhedus goral), occur sympatrically in the Qinling Mountains of China. Because brucellae are often transmitted by direct contact or exposure to a contaminated environment, it is possible that rather than being a natural reservoir for the bacteria, takins are infected horizontally by contact with birth exudates from other infected animals (2). However, information on brucellosis prevalence in those sympatric ruminants in China is insufficient. Therefore, further investigation and research are needed to test this hypothesis. Also, brucellosis is endemic among livestock and human populations in western China. Because domestic sheep and goats are grazed in the mountains, infections in livestock can spill over into wildlife, such as takins. Brucellosis in humans might also be caused by exposure to infected animals during activities like the handling, skinning, and eviscerating of the carcasses of infected animals.
Whether takins are the reservoir host or an accidental host for B. melitensis is still unclear. To further understand the interaction of brucellae among wildlife, domestic animals, and humans, and for purposes of brucellosis management and control, systematic investigations of brucellosis prevalence among wildlife should be conducted.
This study was supported by grants to the Wildlife-borne Diseases Surveillance Project from the State Forestry Administration of China, the joint project of the National Wildlife Research Center of the US Department of Agriculture and the Institute of Zoology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (O760621234); the Science and Technology Support Project of the Eleventh Five-Year Plan of China (2009BAI83B01); and the Special Major Project of the National Department of Science and Technology (2009ZX10004-109).
Jing Luo, Zhigao Zeng, Yanling Song, and Hongxuan He
Author affiliation: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China
(1.) Cutler SJ, Whatmore AM, Commander NJ. Brucellosis--new aspects of an old disease. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98:127081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672. 2005.02622.x
(2.) Bienen L, Tabor G. Applying an ecosystem approach to brucellosis control: can an old conflict between wildlife and agriculture be successfully managed? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2006;4:319-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295 (2006)4[319:AAEATB]2.0.CO;2
(3.) Corbel MJ. Brucellosis: an overview. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:213-21. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0302.970219
(4.) Scholz HC, Nockler K, Gollner C, Bahn P, Vergnaud G, Tomaso H, et al. Brucella inopinata sp. nov., isolated from a breast implant infection. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:801-8. http://dx.doi. org/10.1099/ijs.0.011148-0
(5.) Alton GG, Jones LM, Angus RD, Verger JM. Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory. Paris: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; 1988. p. 42-60.
(6.) Gee JE, De BK, Levett PN, Whitney AM, Novak RT, Popovic T. Use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for rapid confirmatory identification of Brucella isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3649-54. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.8.3649 3654.2004
(7.) Bricker BJ, Halling SM. Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:2660-6.
(8.) Ewalt DR, Bricker BJ. Validation of the abbreviated Brucella AMOS PCR as a rapid screening method for differentiation of Brucella abortus field strain isolates and the vaccine strains, 19 and RB51. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:3085-6.
(9.) Cloeckaert A, Verger JM, Grayon M, Grepinet O. Restriction site polymorphism of the genes encoding the major 25 kDa and 36 kDa outer-membrane proteins of Brucella. Microbiology. 1995;141:2111 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/13500872141-9-2111
(10.) International Union for Conservation of Nature. IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2011.2. Budorcas taxicolor. 2008 [cited 2012 May 29]. http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/ details/3160/0http://www.iucnredlist.org
Address for correspondence: Hongxuan He, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1-5 Beichenxi Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, People's Republic of China; email: firstname.lastname@example.org
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Luo, Jing; Zeng, Zhigao; Song, Yanling; He, Hongxuan|
|Publication:||Emerging Infectious Diseases|
|Article Type:||Viewpoint essay|
|Date:||Sep 1, 2012|
|Previous Article:||Dengue fever in South Korea 2006-2010.|
|Next Article:||Measles and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.|